He who so very easily, and quite completely, replaced Jimmy Carter as being the worst president this country has ever had the misfortune to elect, once again recently slinked, or is it slunked, from his home in the sewer to once again attempt to sell to the American people on what was essentially nothing more than his typical brand of political snake oil! And of course I’m sure everyone has already guessed who it is of whom I speak, none other than Barry Obummer. The man who is most responsible for the fact that America now finds itself engulfed in a level toxic hate never before seen. Obummer’s true legacy are the terrorist organizations that essentially he created, ones like BLM and Antifa.
It was ex-president Obummer who in his continuing effort to never let a crisis, or in this instance a tragedy, go to waste, used the recent Texas church shooting that left 26 people dead on Sunday to once again call for stricter gun control. He said that Americans should ask God for “the wisdom to ask what concrete steps we can take to reduce the violence and weaponry in our midst.” It was on Twitter that Obummer said, “We grieve with all the families in Sutherland Springs harmed by this act of hatred, and we’ll stand with the survivors as they recover.” Adding “May God also grant all of us the wisdom to ask what concrete steps we can take to reduce the violence and weaponry in our midst.”
Obummer, has continued to take an unusually active role during his successor’s administration, and even George W. Bush has now seen fit to offer criticism of his own when it comes our current president despite the fact that he never uttered so much as a single word of criticism of his successor, but, I suppose, that would be a discussion to have on another day. As far as Obummers remarks regarding this most recent tragedy, he, as to be expected, offered no specific details on what those steps to reduce the guns “in our midst” might look like. In reality, as far as Obummer is concerned this shooting was likely seen as being nothing more than an opportunity to exploit, to be used to insert himself into the conversation.
Sunday’s shooting, carried out by 26-year-old Devin Patrick Kelley, was the worst mass shooting in Texas history. And also to be expected, nowhere in Barry’s politicized assessment of this tragedy was there any mention of the fact that had there been just one parishioner in the possession of a gun, just one, we would not today be talking about how 26 people here gunned down in a Texas church. As it was a local gun owner that’s reported to have opened fire on Kelley with a rifle, preventing him from taking any more lives. Obummer’s reaction to Sunday’s massacre was significantly more political than was President Trump’s. That would be because with Obummer is must always be about politics, all the time.
But I really don’t see a need not pay any attention to Obummer. He sees this as an opportunity to connect with those who reside at his end of the political spectrum. And while there are those who will no doubt pay some level of attention to him when he speaks on this topic, few are going to take him seriously when it comes to tax policy, defense policy, foreign policy or even healthcare policy. So he must take advantage of every opportunity, no matter how gruesome, to gain for himself some level of attention for himself. Barry love nothing more than the spotlight, and these 26 dead in Texas is an opportunity for him to once again take center stage in an effort to get as much attention as possible focused on him.
This call for “fewer guns” may sound like a great idea to those on the left, especially at moments such as this, but to those of us with a brain such claims are seen as being nothing more than attempts to exploit a tragedy all in the effort to advance one’s kooky, and more than a little dangerous, political agenda. Fewer guns would not have kept this or any other mass shooting from taking place. Because just like those tragedies where a truck or a knife is used, it’s not the guns, it’s the people using their preferred weapon of choice. You see the problem is not fewer guns, it’s fewer criminals. If we can’t control them and their crimes how in the Hell are we going to control their non-compliance with our already existing gun laws?
Obummer, like our other current ex-presidents, has the privilege of being constantly surrounded by a taxpayer funded security team for the rest of his life, and to have his family protected against home invasion with fences, Secret Service agents with “assault-style” weapons with “high capacity” magazines, and yet he has the gall to seek to deprive you and me of the same ability to do all that we can to protect ourselves and our loved ones from those who wish to do us harm. He advocates against law abiding gun owners being able to own a gun and to defend themselves against those that he remains in favor of allowing to flood into our country courtesy of our very porous southern border. A border that he did nothing to secure.
Oddly enough my gun has never once jumped out of my car or left my house and shot anyone! What exactly is “reasonable gun control” anyway? There already are numerous reasonable gun laws on the books. It’s not just about keeping guns out of the hands of those who would harm others intentionally, no gun control can do that. What would follow “reasonable gun control” would likely be the eventual disarmament of those who use guns reasonably, so that we all become targets of those who use guns unreasonably. Moreover, we all would be victims of the government in an additional way. The first thing Hitler did, upon gaining office, was to disarm the German citizenry. And we know what happened next.
There is one thing for sure. That as long as we continue to have tragedies such as this most recent shooting in Texas, we will also be forced to contend not only with the Democrats, but also their many minions in the state-controlled media, regarding their continued calls for more and restrictive forms of gun control. But we should never allow ourselves to be convinced that those calls have anything whatsoever to do with public safety or loss of life. Because just like their justification for Obamacare had absolutely nothing to do with making sure every single American would be able to obtain cost effective health insurance, their calls for stricter gun control have nothing to do with reducing gun violence or the number of mass shootings.
Because the common denominator that can be so easily recognized regarding both of these two liberal causes is that they both have to do with one thing, and one thing only. And that one thing is, of course, that they are both seen as being far more efficient and effective methods of providing the government with a much better means of controlling the populace. And that’s what this is really all about, it’s what it has always been all about. You’d have to be pretty stupid to think that the Democrats genuinely care whether or not people are able to obtain health insurance or have any desire whatsoever to reduce gun violence. These things are nothing more than unscrupulous means to what can only be called a diabolical end.