The New York Slimes, that provider of even less useful information than is ‘The National Enquirer’, now appears to be actively encouraging voters in those states where gun control on the ballot to vote for stronger regulations and all under the guise that more gun control equals less crime and therefore a safer populace. Meanwhile, gun-controlled Chicago is nearing 600 homicides for 2016 alone. According to ‘The Slimes’, “analysis” from George Soros-funded Center for American Progress shows that “gun fatalities in states with weaker laws are three times as high as in those states with tougher restrictions.” Based on this, the paper calls for voters in “California, Maine, Nevada, and Washington” to support gun control measures that will be on the ballot next month.
But something that ‘The Slimes’ fails to mention, because it would likely damage their argument, is that California is already one of the most gun-controlled states in the union. It has comprehensive background checks — which eliminate a “gun show loophole” or “online loophole” — a waiting period on gun purchases, firearm registration, and gun confiscation laws, yet it also had the May 23, 2014, Santa Barbara attack, the December 2, 2015, San Bernardino firearm-based terror attack, the June 1, 2016, murder-suicide on the gun-free UCLA campus, and the October 8, 2016, high-profile shooting deaths of two police officers in Palm Springs. So once again we have an argument being advanced by this rag of a newspaper that’s completely devoid of any logic or truth.
And it’s another very blue state, Washington, that also has comprehensive background checks — the very checks which Hitlery, Gabby Giffords, and ‘Nanny Mike’ Bloomberg-funded gun control groups pursue as being key to American safety. Yet our nation’s most recent mass shooting took place in Burlington, Washington, on September 23. Five innocent lives were taken in Cascades Mall. On July 30, three innocents were shot and killed at a house party just north of Seattle, and in late February, the AP reported a gunman killed four people then himself in Belfair, Washington. It’s as if these people don’t even bother to do the slightest amount of fact-checking regarding what’s really going on in places where strict gun laws exist, before opening their big, fat pie-holes. Oh, that’s right, they don’t!
Ironically, much of the momentum for gun control continues to come from the December 14, 2012, attack on Sandy Hook Elementary. Even now, new laws are being pushed under the guise of preventing such an attack, and ‘The Slimes’ says a total of eight states have passed “universal background checks” — the same thing as comprehensive background checks — as a way to keep a Sandy Hook-like attack from occurring. But if the examples of California and Washington state teach us anything, it is that comprehensive background checks offer no hindrance whatsoever to determined attackers. All that they offer is very much a false sense of security. Because as has been said before, repeatedly, criminals don’t volunteer for background checks, only law abiding citizens must.
In fact, I think it’s worth remembering that Connecticut was ranked 5th in the nation for most stringent gun controls when the attack on Sandy Hook occurred. The Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence lauded Connecticut for 5th “toughest” laws in 2011, and in 2012, Adam Lanza, the shooter involved, circumvented every one of those laws by stealing his guns and carrying out a heinous crime in a ‘gun-free’ zone. Nevertheless, ‘The Slimes’ contends that more gun control will ultimately make us all safer. Now I suppose if you’re some mentally challenged Democrat, stricter guns and ‘gun-free zones’ make a lot of sense. But it’s best to keep in mind that if something makes sense to a Democrat then it’s highly likely that there’s going to be some pretty dire consequences for the rest of us.
Meanwhile, as mentioned earlier, homicides in gun-controlled Chicago so far this year are approaching 600 following another weekend of firearm-related death and mayhem. The Chicago Tribune reports that “at least 35” people were shot and wounded and another five were shot and killed between 6 pm Friday, October 7, and the morning of October 10. “Four people were shot within six blocks of each other over one hour Sunday night.” The weekend’s violence brings the total number of homicides in the city to 578 year-to-date. The Tribune also reported there have been a total of 3,368 shooting victims between January 1 and October 11, 2016 — that figure includes fatal and non-fatal shootings. There were 2,988 shooting victims for the whole of 2015.
Violence in gun-controlled Chicago set a record in August 2016 with 472 people shot and 90 people killed, and that was according to ABC News. It was the deadliest August in two decades and it came on the heels of the deadliest July since 2006. ABC News also reported “nearly 12” people, on average, were shot every day in Chicago between January 1 and September 1. And yet the call for even stricter gun laws has persisted despite the fact that it has been consistently shown that stricter gun laws do absolutely NOTHING to reduce gun violence. When you make it increasingly difficult for law-abiding citizens to possess a firearm, allowing them to defend themselves, all you are really doing is to make those citizens little more than sitting ducks. It’s a policy that makes zero sense.
It’s in the long term that should the American people ever be forced to give up their weapons, while at the same time the state is not, that’s when the American people become defenseless and the state really gets to work. And once the state has its boot on your neck it will crush the life out of you. Those who hold all of the power know full well that the biggest obstacle to their sinister plans is a well-armed free American public. If I was a cynical person I would guess that Democrats need to load about 80 million Americans onto trains for their final solution of bringing in 100 million foreigners that will be slaves to the Democrat Party for the next 100 years, if not longer. There is no other way to load that many people onto trains for the final solution but to take all the guns away first.
But in the short term, gun control has little to do with the level of violence that’s occurring because it’s 100% a demographic problem. Just look at the population make up of Chicago and that should tell you why there is so much violence. Use a global map that shows global rates for violent crimes, you will notice a direct correlation, the darker the population gets, the higher the crime rates go. It’s a cultural problem not a race problem. Take for example Nigerian Americans who excel in the US. They are West African, which is where most African-Americans come from, and routinely outperform most other ethnic groups. Most of the problems can be traced back to failed social programs, mass media and constantly being told no matter what you do, the man will hold you down.
This is the environment that has been created by the Democrats and that has continually allowed them to harvest what can only be described as being election gold for decades. If black Americans were to ever actually assert themselves, Democrat power in this country would be brought to an end. And it’s obvious that those in the Democrat Party realize this because of their efforts to open the floodgates to illegal immigration. These are the folks who are essentially their electoral failsafe should the lightbulb ever go off in the heads of enough blacks and they suddenly realize how it is that the Democrats have been playing them for fools for over 50 years, if not longer. Now I’m not saying that that’s ever going to happen, but the Democrat Party must be of the opinion that it might.