WE’RE FINDING OUT THAT ‘THE SWAMP’ WILL NOT GO QUIETLY…

Swamp 3

Isn’t it odd that Democrats, perhaps the most prolific bunch of cheaters, electorally speaking, on the entire planet, are ALWAYS the first ones out of the gate when it comes to accusing others of ‘cheating’.  And isn’t is just as odd how those in the state-controlled media are just as quick in their attempt to make the case that all Democrats should be seen as pure as the wind driven snow.  Now make no mistake here, I am in no way trying to say that I think Donald Trump Jr. did anything that can be, or should be, seen as being the least bit shady or underhanded.  I seriously doubt that there was any malice intended here, whereas every time it’s a Democrat looking to pull a fast one it is nearly always for some sinister purpose.  If Donald Jr. can be accused of being anything, it’s that he is a bit naïve when it comes to the wild and rather wacky world of politics.  But of course the first conclusion that our ‘above reproach’ Democrats have jumped to, is that he was trying to cheat.

And it was all in the name of ‘fake news’ that many ‘journalists’ reacted breathlessly to a New York Times report on Sunday revealing that President Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., met with a Russian lawyer who indicated she had damaging information about Hitlery.  Donald Jr. has admitted to the June 2016 meeting — to which he brought campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Trump adviser Jared Kushner — but downplayed its significance.  It was this past Monday that he wrote on Twitter, “Obviously I’m the first person on a campaign to ever take a meeting to hear info about an opponent,” adding that the meeting “went nowhere” but that he “had to listen.”  Many Trump critics, of which there are many, claimed that the New York Times report supported the ‘theory’ that members of the Trump campaign were somehow involved in the Russian government’s hacking of Hitlery’s campaign chair John Podesta and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

But Trump Jr., Kushner and Manafort’s lone meeting with the Russian lawyer pales when compared to the coordination that took place between Hitlery allies and Ukrainian government officials who hoped to see Hitlery win the 2016 election.  Politico revealed in January some of the Ukrainian government’s anti-Trump activities during the election.  A veteran DNC ‘operative’ who previously worked in the ‘Slick Willy’ White House, Alexandra Chalupa, worked with Ukrainian government officials and journalists from both Ukraine and America to dig up Russia-related opposition research on Trump and Manafort.  She also shared her anti-Trump research with both the DNC and Hitlery’s campaign.  Chalupa met with Ukrainian Ambassador Valeriy Chaly and one of his aides, Oksara Shulyar, at the Ukrainian Embassy in March 2016 to talk about unearthing Paul Manafort’s Russian connections, Chalupa admitted to Politico.  Four days later, Trump officially fired Manafort.

And it was also according to Politico: “The day after Manafort’s hiring was revealed, she briefed the DNC’s communications staff on Manafort, Trump and their ties to Russia, according to an operative familiar with the situation.”  The Politico report also notes that the DNC encouraged Chalupa to try to arrange an interview with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to talk about Manafort’s ties to the former pro-Russia president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort previously advised.  The embassy declined to arrange the meeting but was nevertheless “helpful.”  And she went on to say, “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.”  And she added that, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”  Chalupa also told Politico that the Ukrainian embassy worked directly with reporters in uncovering dirt on Manafort and Trump.

Like other DNC staffers, some of Chalupa’s emails were obtained by hackers and published by WikiLeaks.  In one email released by WikiLeaks, Chalupa told Luis Miranda, then the DNC’s communications director, that she was working with Yahoo News reporter Michael Isikoff and “connected him to the Ukrainians.”  Chalupa said, “A lot more coming down the pipe. I spoke to a delegation of 68 investigative journalists from Ukraine last Wednesday at the Library of Congress – the Open World Society’s forum – they put me on the program to speak specifically about Paul Manafort and I invited [Yahoo News reporter] Michael Isikoff whom I’ve been working with for the past few weeks and connected him to the Ukrainians.”  And added, “More offline tomorrow since there is a big Trump component you and Lauren need to be aware of that will hit in next few weeks and something I’m working on you should be aware of.”

The Open World Leadership Center, which funded Chalupa’s briefing of ‘journalists’ about Manafort, is a taxpayer-funded congressional agency.  A spokeswoman for the center emphasized to Politico that the center is ‘non-partisan’ and that “our delegations hear from both sides of the aisle, receiving bipartisan information.”  After Trump’s shocking victory, the Ukrainian government told Politico, “We have never worked to research and disseminate damaging information about Donald Trump and Paul Manafort.”  But Andrii Telizhenko, a former Ukrainian embassy officer, told Politico that he was assigned to work with Chalupa.  He said, “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa.”  And then went onto say, “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa.”  Telizhenko said, “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but added that “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

And then we have our industrious little ‘journalists’ busying themselves trying to create proof where none exists of Trump-Russia collusion, while the public record shows that Democrats have willfully used Moscow disinformation to influence the presidential election against Donald Trump and attack his administration.  The disinformation came in the form of a Russian-fed dossier written by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele. It contains a series of unverified criminal charges against Mr. Trump’s campaign aides, such as coordinating Moscow’s hacking of Democratic Party computers.  Some Democrats have widely circulated the discredited information. Mr. Steele was paid by the Democrat-funded opposition research firm Fusion GPS with money from a Hillary Clinton backer. Fusion GPS distributed the dossier among Democrats and journalists.  The information fell into the hands of the FBI, which used it in part to investigate Mr. Trump’s campaign aides.

Mr. Steele makes clear that his unproven charges came almost exclusively from sources linked to the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin.  He identified his sources as “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure,” a former “top level Russian intelligence officer active inside the Kremlin,” a “senior Kremlin official” and a “senior Russian government official.”  And oddly enough it has been the very same Democrats who have condemned Russia’s election interference via plying fake news and hacking email servers that have quoted freely from the Steele anti-Trump memos derived from creatures of the Kremlin.  In other words, there is public evidence of significant, indirect collusion between Democrats and Russian disinformation.  A former Trump campaign adviser who asked not to be identified because of the pending investigations made an excellent point saying, “If anyone colluded with the Russians, it was the Democrats,”

And it was this same advisor who then went on to say, “After all, they’ve routinely shopped around false claims from the debunked Steele dossier, which listed sources including senior Kremlin officials. If anyone should be investigated in Washington, it ought to be Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Mark Warner and their staffers.”  That would be a reference to Rep. Adam B. Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; Sen. Mark R. Warner, Virginia Democrat and vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; and Rep. Eric Swalwell, a California, Democrat on the House intelligence panel.  So as we can see the Democrats seem to be of the opinion that they get to play by their own rules and then justify such behavior by claiming that because they perceive their candidate in the last election to have been wronged, that can then do whatever they feel like in trying to undermine the winner.

So we have Hitlery who can’t find her emails, Loretta Lynch who can’t remember, Nancy Pelsoi who isn’t sure about anything, even about who it is that’s president and Obummer who hid Rice’s records about unmasking of wiretaps of GOP politicians.  We have no idea what ‘Slick Willy’ and Lynch talked about on a private jet on a runway, and none of Hitlery’s staff is talking now that they have immunity deals, no one knows why the Russian Ambassador visited Obummer’s White House 22 times, or why Obummer promised the Russian ambassador “more flexibility after the elections”, and Benghzi was caused by a video no one has seen.  Right, the Democrats have no information.  And these idiots ran our country for eight years, and ran it right into the ground.  And we’re all supposed to be able to trust whatever it is that the Democrats, and their friends in the media, say about President Trump or anyone in his family or on his staff.  That’s nothing but pure unadulterated insanity.

Say what you will but there is not a doubt in my mind that Donald Jr. is in any way a traitor to this country, he has done nothing that can even remotely be described as being traitorous.  If meeting with a Russian lawyer is being a traitor, then what about Teddy ‘The Drunk’ Kennedy making a trip to Moscow for a meeting with the Communist government of the USSR to figure out how to keep Reagan from winning a second term?  How about Hitlery and Podesta and their dealings with Russia?  How about their getting intel, (that turned out to be fake), on Trump from foreign nationals?  Hitlery committed treason when she “wheeled and dealed” her way to being a multi-millionaire.  She also did nothing to help or save our people in Benghazi.  But personally, I do think it’s traitorous for a public servant to maintain her own private server with classified information on it and that can be so easily hacked.  Hitlery hates America, we dodged a rather sizable bullet when President Trump won!

And yet despite all ‘The Swamp’s’ best efforts, the president has done pretty damn good so far.  No Paris climate agreement, no more DAPA, Second Amendment rights protected and restored to the elderly and disabled that Obummer took away, the DOW at records highs, credit scores at the highest they have ever been, China is finally on our side against North Korea, ceasefire with Russia in Syria, stopped payment of millions of dollars to Syria that Obummer was sending to ISIS, rebuilding our military, exposing the fake media every day, making people suffer for their hate and anti-Americanism, Kate’s law, sanctuary city crackdowns, travel ban in place even though Democrats tried desperately to stop it, Supreme Court majority for the next generation, ISIS is beaten in Mosul, head of ISIS is dead.  And let’s not forget the increase in jobs and the decreasing price of gas.  Or the fact that the VA fired over 500 of those letting our veterans die.  So still progress has been made.

MARTY ‘THE MORON’ SHEEN, ANOTHER EMPTY-HEADED HOLLYWEIRD LOSER…

Sheen 2

Ya know, the more they come, the crazier they sound.  If it’s not Bobby De Niro, then it’s Rob ‘Meathead Reiner, and if it’s not either one of them it’s any of a number of others on what has now become a rather impressively long list of flaming kooks.  And I continue to find it quite amazing that any of these loons actually think that the American people are waiting with baited breath to hear what they might have to say.  But when you stop and consider the fact that very few of these losers were intelligent enough to have successfully navigated through 13 years of public education, you have to wonder what it is that makes them think that average Americans would ever give a rat’s behind when it comes to what they think regarding the truly important issues of the day.

Anyway, this time around it was Marty Sheen who ripped President Donald Trump just this week in a fundraising email sent on behalf of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.  And it was in this email, entitled “Disgusted,” that Marty says his portrayal of President Josiah Bartlet on the NBC political drama ‘The West Wing’ taught him how Washington D.C. should be governed.  He can’t be serious, can he?  Yes, he is definitely serious.  So we’re now supposed to view his time playing a president on some kooky little television show as giving him some level of credibility when it comes to all that’s involved in actually ‘being’ president?  Talk about delusional.  This boob is yet another guy who appears to be more than ready for a rubber room.

Marty says in the email, “My time playing the president on The West Wing taught me what Washington should be like.”  And then he goes on to say, “And right now, with the Republicans in control, it’s far from what we, as Americans, deserve.”  Marty also slammed congressional Republicans for “kowtowing to their rich special interests,” while asking voters to contribute between $1 and $250 to congressional Democrats.  And he said that he’s “most disgusted by the Republican effort to gut health care and social programs for Americans in need.”  The Marty-featured fundraising email comes as the national Democrat Party posted its worst May of fundraising since 2003, raising just $4.29 million.

So I’m guessing we can apply Marty’s logic to the characters other actors have played, such as his time playing Captain Kirk on ‘Star Trek’ taught William Shatner what running a starship would be like or Lou Ferrigno playing ‘The Incredible Hulk’ taught him what it would like to be a muscle-bound, gamma-ray mutated superhero–but, only when he’s angry, and his role in the ‘Terminator’ really taught Arnold Schwarzenegger what it would like to be a cyborg killing machine from the future.  Oh, and Johnny Depp really knows how a pirate ship should be run, due to his recurring role as ‘Captain Jack Sparrow’.  Seriously, folks, how disconnected from reality can one get?  This guy seems a bit demented, an affliction that seems all too common in Hollyweird these days.

But look, we shouldn’t be surprise as this is hardly the first time that old Marty has seen fit to go after Trump.  During the presidential campaign, Marty said then-candidate Trump was “an empty-headed moron” that had “absolutely nothing to offer” American voters and had “no chance” at winning the White House in November.  Marty also appeared in an anti-Trump campaign ad after the election that sought to get members of the Electoral College to switch their votes to former Democrat candidate Hitlery.  Marty and his many friends there in Hollyweird continually demonstrate their ignorance and yet at the same time seem to be undeterred by it as they go out and about trying to convince us that they are worthy of being listened to.

But here’s the problem, these clowns act in movies mimicking reality but they can’t tell the difference between what’s real and what’s not.  Remember when Jessica Lange spoke at Farm Aid so many decades ago and thought she spoke with authority because she had played a farmer’s wife in some movie?   So reading a script that someone else wrote while pretending to be the president somehow makes Marty qualified to know all that’s involved in actually ‘being’ the Presidency.  So why hasn’t he ever had his Hollyweird friends bankroll his own run for the presidency?  Here’s something to think about. His little video about the Electoral College reveals one of two things: either he and his celebrity friends are too stupid to know how it works, or they thought we were.

And are we also to assume then that the only intelligence, knowledge and experience an actor has comes solely by pretending to be someone that he, or she, is not?  Marty is just an actor, a fake person, a fraud. He has no importance, certainly no more than anyone else there.  He proves that the Democrat Party tends to attract the least intelligent people, which, I believe, they do on purpose. They know there’s more dimwitted people than there are intelligent people.  People like Marty pretend to care about social issues in their effort to avoid being called mean or uncaring.  They don’t go out of their way to find the truth.  Just look at Marty.  He thinks he knows how to be a president by playing one on television.  If you think that’s nuts, you can’t really be a Democrat.

But why would anyone care what Marty thinks?  Is he an expert in economics, health care, or diplomacy?  Is he an expert at anything at all?   He’s a has-been who has never shown a large degree of intelligence or experience in world affairs.  If he wants to advise on acting or even directing I am sure many would pay attention.  I guess it’s nice to know that he is still alive and somewhat coherent, but he’s not really an influential kind of presence.  He’s just another third rate “has been” trying to suck out 15 more minutes of fame before sinking into nothingness.  It would seem that all of the “has-bee” leftists are now crawling out of the woodwork, hoping to be relevant one last time.  You can tell Marty’s type of “leadership” by how he raised his worthless son, Charlie.  But I digress.

And really Marty, you can be disgusted all you want. The fact is that Trump is our president and not merely playing one on television!  And who are you again?  Oh that’s right, nothing more than a disgruntled old fart who has to read from a teleprompter and who struts around as if he’s still relevant.  While you were busy being a wealthy elitist progressive, America was busy electing Trump.  Your ideology isn’t working and is badly in need of a new piper.  The disturbing thing is, that there are actually people walking around who are stupid enough for fall for the crap spewed by Marty and his Hollyweird friends.  Are these people stupid enough to believe that what happens on a television, or in the movies, is how the real world should be?  I’m afraid they are.

THEM THAT BROKE IT, SHOULD NEVER BE TRUSTED TO FIX IT…

Democrats 56

Have you ever wondered if, had it not been for that which is often referred to as being the “Great Recession”, the man who would go on to become the worst president in recent memory would have ever been elected?  And I think it’s worth mentioning because when it comes to determining the primary cause for this “great recession” it’s obvious that things were set into motion back in the late 70’s courtesy of a Democrat scheme called the Community Re-Investment Act (CRA).  The evidence is overwhelming that the CRA played a significant role in creating lax lending standards which then fueled the housing bubble which in turn lead to the 2008 financial meltdown that, even 9 years later, we have yet to fully recover from.  And it was at the beginning when we thought things could not get any worse, that we fell for the pitch from snake oil salesman Barry Obummer, and for 6 long years America was made to languish through the most anemic economic ‘recovery’ in our history.

It should also come as no surprise to find out that, according to Freedom Works economic consultant Stephen Moore, economists in the Obummer White House overestimated annual economic growth pretty significantly, by roughly 80 percent on average, for a six year stretch during Obummer’s presidency.  Economists predicted growth between 3.2 to 4.6 percent for the years 2010 through 2015.  However, thanks to the disastrous economic polices put in place by Obummer, actual economic growth never got above 2.6 percent.  And it was in writing in The Washington Times that Mr. Moore said, “Why does anyone bother to listen to economists anymore?”  And he went on to say, “Almost all of the economics profession … bought into the Keynesian idea that what would revive the economy after the Great Recession of 2008-09 was massive government spending ‘stimulus.’ The trillions of dollars of government borrowing here and abroad created a decade-long anemic recovery.”

Keynesian economic thought dominated Barry’s economic policy after the “Great Recession”, economics professor Richard McKenzie wrote for the Foundation of Economic Education in 2010.  The Keynesian/Obummer approach to recovery meant the federal government would engage in deficit spending in order to stimulate the economy.  The logic, McKenzie writes, was that deficit spending would go, directly or indirectly, into the pockets of Americans, giving them the ability and will to spend.  According to Keynesian thought, as money circulates in the economy, the government’s initial investment could multiply to a total economic benefit five or 10 times greater than the original stimulus, McKenzie wrote.  However, it’s Mr. Moore who blames this thread of thinking for stunting growth that could have been a much more vibrant recovery.  And while I am in no way an economist, nor do I play one on Television, logic alone tells me that he is correct in his assessment.

Mr. Moore goes onto write, “For much of America this has been a long recession, not a long recovery. We are suffering from a severe growth deficit.”  And he adds, “Nearly every policy during the Obama years was anti-growth …  If Mr. Trump is able to to shift those policies into reverse — especially by getting tax rates down, not up — 3 to 4 percent growth is easily achievable.”  Now as much as Democrats may refuse to acknowledge it, the economy is already showing signs of renewed life.  Under Trump the Dow has reached new heights, unemployment benefit claims are at their lowest in 40 years, consumer confidence it at its highest since 2001 and the dollar is thriving. President Trump’s pro-business policies help to boost consumer confidence and have led to private sector investments and job creation.  By and rolling back Obummer-era regulations and setting strict criteria for new regulations President Trump has fostered a friendly environment for businesses and revitalized the coal and other energy sectors in the U.S.

As I mentioned earlier, the recession had as its root cause in legislation that was enacted into law back during the Carter years that was then made far worse by ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton.  And while the recession cannot, I suppose, be said to have made worse during the Obummer era, the policies that were put into place during Barry’s tenure most certainly prevented us from achieving anything that could even remotely be described as being a dynamic economic recovery.  Let’s face it, from the moment Obummer first became the Democrat nominee and began looking more and more like a sure thing against McCain, people and businesses started to withdraw from the financial world, and then with laws like Obamacare and the very bogus “stimulus” bill coming into effect, the Obummer era wreaked all manner of havoc on what was left of our economy.  With all the negatives that Obummer brought to the table, frankly it’s amazing that the country isn’t worse off, economically speaking.

Obummer & Co. pretty much destroyed any semblance of optimism possessed by the American people, along with just about everything else they touched, as they went about attacking small businesses, (You didn’t build that!), and created what was essentially an environment in which there were many companies that found themselves in the position of being forced into either laying off many of their employees or to cut back on the number of hours their employees could work.  The best thing to happen from Trump being elected president is that he has brought with him his sense exuberant optimism and his savvy as a businessman and he has not been shy about undertaking an effort to erase, as if it never existed, the long national nightmare that was Obummer’s presidency.  He took command of our trade deals by withdrawing from the job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership, holding our trade partners accountable, and putting American jobs first.

I mean let’s face it, if Keynesian economics really worked, the Great Depression wouldn’t have lasted 11 miserable years.  Now of course, the Keynesians have 1,001 excuses at the ready to explain this away, most of which are variations of ‘it would have been so much worse!’  No matter what happens, you can always say “Gosh, it would have been even worse without those Keynesian remedies!”  And with the arrival of President Trump it’s now those who were once singing the praises of Barry Obummer as being some sort of an economic genius who are now busying themselves poo-pooing nearly all of Trumps economic plans for how he intends to go about making America great again.  President Trump’s agenda has led to lower unemployment, increased wages, hundreds of thousands of new jobs, and has put the U.S. on a path towards unprecedented economic growth.  And yet the Democrats choose to talk about everything other than the positive changes President Trump is making.

DEMOCRATS HAVE MUCH BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN NANCY PELOSI…

Democrats 42

If those Democrats who are now so loudly complaining about Nancy Pelosi think that she alone is responsible for all of their problems, then the party is in far worse trouble than even they can imagine.  Because it isn’t just Pelosi, the Democrat Party has many more problems than her.  Now I agree that Pelosi is toxic, but so is Chuckie Schumer, as is ex-president ‘Slick Willy’ and wife Hitlery, as is ex-president Obummer as well as a long list of many other Democrats that would take up far too much space to list here.  Now according to most of the polling data that I’ve seen America tends to be moderate with a slight tilt toward the right.  The Democrats seem to be interested only in seeing just how far to the left they can go, and in the process they are leaving most of America behind.  It’s become painfully obvious that they clearly don’t care about ‘the people’ anymore nor the present state of our country.  Their only interest appears to be returning to power any way they can and once that has been achieved to maintain that power by any and all means necessary.  So it has become all about having political power.  Now while the Republicans too have issues, that discussion is for another day.

Tim Ryan, a Democrat from Ohio, has said the Democrat Party’s “toxic” brand under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi is making it difficult for their party to connect with voters.  And it was during a recent appearance on MS’LDS’s ‘Morning Joe’ that Ryan went so far as to say, “We’ve got a lot of energy in our base, which is very exciting for a lot of us to see that on the ground.” And he went on to say, “But you’ve got to beat the Republican and you’ve got to carry this very toxic Democratic brand on your back, too. That’s a tough thing to ask a candidate running for Congress.”  I would only choose to add that when your base starts thinking it’s a good idea to assassinate members of the opposition, then maybe they have a bit too much ‘energy’.  Anyway, his comments come on the heels of an embarrassing loss in a special election in a Georgia House race, the fourth such loss since President Trump took office.  Democrats and Republicans both invested heavily in the contest, which became the most expensive House race in U.S. history.  But still, placing all of the blame on Pelosi is being more than a bit myopic.  One person cannot be made responsible for the mess the Democrat Party is now in.

Ryan, who tried unsuccessfully to unseat Pelosi as House minority leader last fall, said that despite President Trump’s sinking approval rating, “it will be very hard” for Democrats to win back the majority in the House during the 2018 midterm elections with Pelosi in charge.  He said, “It’s going to be more challenging, certainly.”  And then he added, “You see these commercials that tie these candidates to Leader Pelosi week in and week out in the last several months. That still moves the needle.”  He continued by saying, “We can do it because it’s Donald Trump.”  And he said, “But I mean, you think, what if it was John Kasich?  What if it was Marco Rubio?  I mean, we would be in real trouble right now as a party, and we can’t forget that fact.”  From my own perspective I’m glad that it isn’t Kasich or Rubio!  And if he thinks that it’s only Pelosi that inspires distrust in the Democrat Party, then he hasn’t got a clue about what it’s going to take to ‘fix’ it.  And then it was in an interview with the New York Times Ryan put it another way.  It was then that he said, “Our brand is worse than Trump.”  Well no shit, isn’t that kind of a no-brainer?

And it was this past Wednesday night that Ryan told the Crappy News Network’s Don Lemon that it’s clear the Democrat Party has a messaging problem.  He said, “We have Donald Trump as president now.”  And he went on to say, “We’ve done something terribly wrong to make that so. And we’ve lost traditional Democratic voters that don’t see us as connecting to them, don’t see us as advocates for them. We’ve got to put ourselves in the best position possible to be able to win these races.”  He continued saying, “Look, I don’t think everybody should get a trophy in life.”  And he concluded by saying, “You get trophies because you earn them. I don’t like second place. I don’t like moral victories. I believe in the ideas of the Democratic Party. I believe in a government that could be both nimble but yet active and support social justice issues that are critically important.”  Ryan said he would rather focus on the party’s economic message than, say, the federal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.  He said, “The economic message … is something that we’ve got to get back to.”  Adding, “There’s so many families struggling, and we’re kind of not focused on that as much as we should be.”

Sean Maloney, a Democrat from New York, put it a bit more bluntly and in language that we have all now become very accustomed to these days whenever listening to anyone in the Democrat Party.  It was Maloney who told the Washington Post, “Look, we need to win. Everything else is bullshit.”  And then said, “That’s all I’m going to say.”  And it was Kathleen Rice, another Democrat from New York, who said it’s time for Pelosi to go.  It was on MS’LSD’ that Ms. Rice was heard to say, “Nancy Pelosi was a great speaker, she was a great leader, but her time has come and gone.”  And she went on to say, “The rationale for getting new leadership is that we’re losing.”  And Rice continued by saying “Do I think it’s fair that the Republicans’ playbook over the last four election cycles has been attacking Nancy Pelosi and demonizing her? No, that’s not fair, nor is it accurate. But guess what? It works. They’re winning, so we have to address that reality.”  And then it was on the Crappy News Network’s ‘New Day’ that Ms. Rice said, with just a touch of sarcasm, “We’re not losing as badly as we did a year ago. Isn’t that great?”  And she then proceeded to answer her own question, “No!”

In a letter to her Democrat colleagues following Tuesday’s two rather humiliating defeats, Pelosi promised to put forth an economic message “we can all embrace.”  And in speaking to reporters on Thursday morning, Pelosi said she feels “very confident” she has the support of her fellow Democrats, and that the party is “united when it comes to our concern for America’s working families.”  Pelosi added, “I respect any opinion my members have, but my decision about how long I stay is not up to them.”  Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico and chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, sent a separate memo to members the intent of which was apparently to “motivate” them following what was described as being a ‘setback’ in Georgia.  Lujan wrote, “This is about much more than one race.”  And he went on to say, “The national environment, unprecedented grassroots energy and impressive democratic candidates stepping up to run deep into the battlefield leave no doubt that Democrats can take back the House next fall.” However, a nudist in Montana and a guy who didn’t even live in the district he was running in, in Georgia are hardly ‘impressive candidates.’

But as I tried to point out at the beginning, it isn’t just about Pelosi, it’s about the Democrat Party’s anti-America message and leftwing agenda.  It would seem that they are ‘for’ everything that a majority of Americans are against.  They simply can’t bring themselves to understand that the American people don’t want big government inserting its tentacles into every aspect of our lives.  There is nothing that Democrats wouldn’t regulate, or tax, when it comes to productive U.S. citizens, and yet when it comes to lawbreakers, illegals, radical Moslems, and all of the other anti-American fringe groups they fawn over, there is NO regulation.  In essence, the entire Democrat Party is anti-America.  Since ‘I hate President Trump’ is all Democrats seem willing to offer, people will look elsewhere to satisfy their needs.  People want tax cuts, economic growth, education, and jobs choices.  Hating Trump gets them NOTHING!  Everything the Democrats are in favor of suppresses growth.  Raising taxes suppresses growth, big government suppresses growth, more regulations suppress growth.  We need to vote them out to get those things we need.  If they won’t help, we need to get rid of them.

Ryan has it partially right.  Indeed, Pelosi has become rather toxic just as Obummer was wrong headed on almost every issue.  But the Democrats have now abandoned the folks who work for a living, focusing these days much more on mindless socialistic, social justice causes that nauseate the vast majority of decent people.  Yes, there is much wrong with the Democrat Party when Pelosi, Schumer, Hitlery, Wizzerman-Schultz, Obummer, and a whole host of other rabid social reformers speak about the middle class as if they actually know any of them.  When your message is less about the people who pay taxes and more about the people that don’t want to get off their dead asses and go to work, you’re doomed to fail.  My dad worked for 40+ years and never took one dime of assistance from the government and it pisses me off when I see people as healthy as I am doing nothing more than to sit on their butt or making more babies they can’t support, thinking that the rest of us owe them something.  I see 30-somethings still living their parents, even though they are capable of working.  When did we get to the point where we have no expectation of people being forced to GROW up?

In watching ‘Slick Willy’s’ speech in 1992 regarding illegal immigration, one would think he was a Republican.  I note this only to show just how far to the left the Democrats have now moved. ‘Slick’s’ support for DOMA and his work for welfare reforms would be rejected out of hand by today’s Democrat Party.  On top of that, it’s their stance on many social issues that have alienated many ‘moderate’ Democrats, if it can be said that such an animal even exists anymore.  If they don’t see that, then they’re BLIND!  It’s the policies advocated by the Democrat Party that makes their brand toxic.  What makes any particular individual toxic is the level of enthusiasm with which they push for policies that they KNOW are harmful to the American people.  And the ‘Democrat brand’ has been made ‘toxic’ because of their Obamacare disaster, their vile hate and intense rage, their idiotic Russian/Trump conspiracy drumbeat, their leftist ‘fake news’ media, coddling illegals, importing terrorist-infested Moslems, tax and spend ideology, political correctness, men in the ladies’ restrooms, taxpayers forced to fund leftist causes, and today’s liberalism pushing radical anti-American socialism.

No one can deny that the Democrats are in disarray!  And neither can anyone deny that they did it to themselves.  They allowed their lust for power to simply get the better of them and in so doing forgot that they were elected to serve all of America, not just part of it.  They forgot what democracy is and why we are not a communist country.  They started believing their own lies and have spent millions of dollars in the effort to try to make a Russia collusion hoax stick.  They don’t know what they are doing anymore and the more the media tries to help them, the more they make them look foolish.  They have no message other than ‘Trump is Bad.’  That won’t solve anything.  They have also only succeeded in broadening the chasm between themselves and the voters by their constant spewing of hate.  They need to ditch the identity/victim politics and lose the term ‘white privilege’ or they won’t win anything in the middle of the county for a very long time. They have lost 1000 legislative seats at the local, state and federal levels since 2009 and are 0-4 in special elections since losing to candidate Trump last November.  And yet still they have managed to learn nothing.

THE DEMOCRATS: “AND ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST”…

803

Well, if at first you don’t succeed, just stick to your same crappy message and hope for the best!  Such appears to be the game plan for the Democrats as they set about trying to send a message to President Trump and go about their effort to regain control of Congress so they can finally impeach him.  Because make no mistake, that is the only thing that motivates those in the Democrat Party.  And the most recent example of their failed strategy came just last night when Republican Karen Handel’s projected victory over political upstart Jon ‘Pajama Boy’ Ossoff in Georgia’s special election that was almost immediately cast by the Republicans as being a devastating blow for Democrats.  While that may be a bit overstated, it was, most certainly, a blow to the Democrats.

As Handel delivered her victory speech in Atlanta, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) blasted out a memo crowing that Democrats “marshalled [sic] their resources and went all-in Georgia … and they failed.”  The memo said, “After promising a revamped strategy that would deliver them a majority, House Democrats are no closer to that goal today than they were at the beginning of the new year,” and then went on to claim how the Democrats have now gone “0-5 in specials [sic] elections.”  And it was House Speaker Paul ‘RINO’ Ryan who echoed the NRCC when he said, “Democrats from coast to coast threw everything they had at this race, and Karen would not be defeated,” in his statement congratulating Handel on her victory.

Earlier this year Republican House candidates held GOP seats in Kansas and Montana and it was each time that we heard the Democrats telling us that the election would prove to be a referendum on both President Trump and his dangerous agenda.  And each time they were proven to be wrong.  In addition to Handel’s victory Tuesday, Republican Ralph Norman won the election in South Carolina to succeed Mick Mulvaney, who resigned from Congress this past February to become Trump’s Office of Management and Budget director.  And it was kinda funny how after each time their candidate lost an election what we heard from the Democrats is that because their candidate was able to make the race competitive it shows just how much trouble the Republicans are in regarding the 2018 midterm election.

Democrats did manage to hold onto one of their own seats in a California special election earlier this month, as Jimmy Gomez secured the seat vacated by Xavier Becerra, who resigned to become the state’s attorney general.  After Tuesday night’s results, Republicans hold 241 seats in the House of Representatives compared to 194 for the Democrats. Democrats must defend their current districts and win 24 Republican held seats to regain a majority next November.  And while, electorally speaking, November 2018 is still a long way away, our congressional Republicans do need to get off of their collective dead ass and get moving on the big ticket items such as the repealing and replacing of Obamacare, tax reform and, of course, ‘The Wall.’

Look, I’m no political strategist, nor do I play one on TV, but I do have a suggestion for the Democrats.  How about you go out and actually meet with those people who don’t live anywhere near Park Avenue or Rodeo Drive?  Or, if that’s not to your liking, how about you just stop calling them names and calling for there to be blood in the streets?  Just some random thoughts from flyover country.  Personally though, I hope Democrats choose not to follow my advice and remain firmly on their current path into the political wilderness.  It’s for some bizarre reason that they don’t have a clue as to why their open borders, sanctuary city, allowing men in ladies’ rooms and pro-terrorist message isn’t working.  And so, which is fine with me, they continue to fail.

That said, I pray Democrats keep moving even further to the left.  They seem to be so absolutely certain that the country will follow them to oblivion if they are far left enough.  Democrats will now start becoming even more violent and more self-destructive.  They can’t figure out what is happening to them so they just get angrier and angrier.  The destruction of the Democrat Party may now be taking place right before your eyes.  What will their new strategy be now that they have been so thoroughly repudiated again and again and again?  Several ‘unnamed sources’ report that they are planning to assassinate everybody who runs against them.  And if that doesn’t work, they will kill everybody who is against them whether they run for office or not.  Scary times!

Democrats, for whatever the reason, simply don’t understand the American people.  In Obummer’s case he at least had an excuse, in that his formative years were spent in a Moslem country, so he doesn’t have any emotional ties to America.  But it’s hard to explain why it is that so many of those in the Democrat Party possess similar sentiments when it comes to the level of hatred they seem to possess for the United States.  There are plenty of wretched third world countries where Democrats would be better able to sell their special brand of leftwing garbage, it’s why there are wretched third world countries in the first place.  One can only assume that the desire of the Democrat Party is to make America into another third world Hell hole.

I wonder, regarding their loss in Georgia, are the Democrats now looking for way to blame the Russians?  After all, who’s to blame for this catastrophic setback?  This has to be someone’s fault!  Blame it on the rain, blame it on the Russians, or if all else fails, blame it on racism/sexism or some phobia possessed by those who voted against their candidate.  Whatever you do, don’t change your winning message, Democrats. Just throw more money at it and you’ll get ‘em next time, by golly.  And does anyone actually believe that pajama-boy had a 7% lead just seven days ago?  Just another example of how you can no longer trust election polls any more than you can trust the state-controlled news media to be objective and factual when reporting the ‘news’.

And you know, if you ban the right from campus, if you erase the right’s point of view from television and movies, if your spokesmorons think debating is calling us names, if your only plan to save the country is based almost entirely on nothing more than hate and more spending, then you will continue to lose.  As you should!  The noise we hear today could be described as being the death knell of the Democrat Party.  That said, Republican leadership has been less than stellar.  For example, we want the repeal of Obamacare, not some lame attempt to try and fix it.  The House bill was nothing more than Obamacare light leading us to a single payer.  Repeal, repeal, repeal and be able to explain why this is the moral thing to do.

Quite frankly, the only thing that the Democrats continue to have going for them is their incessant whining, calling people names and blaming everyone else for their own miserable failures.  And I have no doubt that they will continue to use their tried and true tactics of identity politics, spewing out insults about coal miners, Walmart shoppers, trailer park residents, the aged, rednecks, white trash, Bible thumpers and gun nuts, while using Hollyweird celebrities to ridicule those supposed white male bigots and deplorables who reside there in flyover country.  And it’s rather mind-boggling that they can continue to somehow think that such tactics will garner for them enough votes to regain some semblance of political power.  Amazing!

Hollyweird, big money, Democrat violence, the ‘Crappy News Network, (CNN), MS’LSD’, the Washington Post, the New York Times or nearly all of academia notwithstanding, the Democrat Party still finds itself on the losing end of the stick.  The Democrats bury their head in the sand and refuse to recognize reality as they double down on their insanity and end up losing more elections.  Their only winning option is to become pro-America, but they would rather die.  The Democrats have been trying to spin every special election as the harbinger of their comeback, but there’s nothing to indicate that the public is buying what they continue to sell.  Especially as the Trump-Russia conspiracy theories continue to fall apart and discredit the state-controlled media in the process.

But even as things continue to unravel for them, I doubt the little light bulb will be going off for them any time soon.  And I think that if we were to go back to that fateful day in January 2019, the Democrats would never have imagined where they would find themselves, as a party, just eight years later.  After all, the election of Obummer was supposed to have ushered in 40 years of solid Democrat rule.  Instead, it made the election of Donald J. Trump not only a possibility, but turned it into something that I doubt even Nostradamus could have seen coming.  And now the Democrats seem to be quite determined in their efforts to undo their handiwork.  If the American people are smart, they’ll see this lunacy for exactly what it is.

But let us not forget that, as it is with all things, life in the world of politics is cyclical.  The favored party of today will, at some point, fall out of favor.  That’s just the way things are.  Which makes it all the more imperative that we seize this opportunity that has been presented to us.  There needs to be some sense of urgency on the part of our congressional Republicans and instead they seem to be of the opinion that their present majorities will last, if not forever, at least for several years to come.  But nothing lasts forever, and that is why we must strike while the iron is hot and while we have a man in the White House who can be counted on to sign those bills which are sent to his desk.  We are wasting entirely too much time.

ELIZABETH WARREN, THERE’S NASTY AND THERE’S ‘REALLY’ NASTY…

Warren 4

When it comes to liberal women, and their penchant for being nasty, I can only say that if the shoe fits ladies, then wear it and wear it proudly.  And apparently if one loudmouth liberal is correct, when it comes to the antics of these nasty liberal ‘females’, we ain’t seen nothing yet.  You see, it was just this past Friday that Elizabeth Warren, senior senator from Massachusetts, that bastion of leftwing lunacy, appeared on an empty New York stage and read excerpts from her latest book, “This Fight is Our Fight: The Battle to Save America’s Middle Class.”  And it was while doing so that she could hardly contain her excitement while reading what sounded like a warning for President Donald Trump.  And it was in reading some of her favorite anti-Trump signs from the nationally-coordinated Women’s March in Boston, Massachusetts, that she said, “And only one more because I have to discipline myself on this. This is a good sign: ‘Donald, you ain’t seen nasty yet.’”

The phrase “nasty woman,” quickly became a slogan after Trump uttered the phrase during the final presidential debate following Hitlery’s remark that she would raise taxes on the rich in order to pay for the nation’s mounting debt.  It was at the time that Hitlery said, “My Social Security payroll contribution will go up, as will Donald’s, assuming he can’t figure out how to get out of it.”  It was then that then candidate Trump moved into his microphone and said in response, “such a nasty woman.”  Warren was speaking at The Town Hall, a New York City-based performance space Friday evening where those in attendance chose to watch Warren read portions from her book and answer questions, instead of attending a rendition of Julius Caesar in which President Trump is killed off.   Another one of her favorite signs was, “women’s rights are not up for grabs.”  Yet, apparently the rights of those who disagree this kind of tripe are most certainly up for grabs!

And it is also in a video that Warren can be seen saying, “What Donald Trump and the Republican majority in the House and the Senate want to do to us, is they want to deliver the knockout blow to the middle class.”  The far-left senator went on to say, “The character of a nation is not the character of its president. The character of a nation is the character of its people.”  Warren read a paragraph from her book that documented her emotion from the Women’s March in the state she represents. She said, “As I marched in Boston with tens of thousands of others that day, I had no illusions. I knew it would be a hard fight. I knew there would be dark moments. But I knew that we had tens of millions of people with us, and this fight would be our fight.”  Warren, who has said she won’t run for president in 2020, recently said she hopes Republicans would “leave their bodies to science” because she “would like to cut them open.”  It would appear she’s quite demented.

For those who may be unaware of just how disgusting and, yes, truly nasty, Ms. Warren is, it was during a debate back in 2010 about proposals about how to fix the financial system that Warren said if a bill for “a stronger consumer agency” was not a possibility, she would choose “no agency at all and plenty of blood and teeth left on the floor.”  And then it was one year later, in an interview with MS‘LSD’s Rachel Maddow that Warren said, “And I have thrown rocks at people that I think are in the wrong.”  And she went on to add, “I’ve done it before, I’ve continued to do it, and I’m going to do it in the future.”  President Trump may not have seen “NASTY” but there is very little doubt that long-suffering Mr. Warren most certainly has!  The Democrat Party has always been rather toxic in how they went after the opposition, but since Obummer, civility seems to have all but died as Democrats have become much more violent and incendiary in the language they use.

Apparently Warren seems not to remember that despite his not getting the ‘nasty’ woman vote, President Trump was quite successful in his bid to win the ‘non-nasty’ woman vote.  Or maybe, that’s where the Russians come in, who knows.  And you know, it’s whenever I hear Warren speak that my first reaction is to reach for the remote so I can hit the mute button because her voice reminds me of fingernails scraping across a chalkboard.  But seriously, I think it’s safe to argue that Warren is trying to do little more that to remain relevant.  Because while I haven’t seen any polls recently, it was not too long ago that she was in a pretty tight race in trying to win re-election.  Maybe she thinks such a tone allows her to better attract the many leftwing kooks who reside in her state, of which there are many.  And I’m quite sure that should she win re-election it will only serve to encourage her to ratchet up her hateful and disgusting rhetoric even further.

I’ve always thought that the title of her book, “The Battle to Save America’s Middle Class”, was more than a little dishonest.  Because the policies that she espouses, as well as every other member of her party, would result in nothing more than to have those in the middle class being ground into the dirt as their hard work and taxes are used to support every bone idle over-breeding Hispanic, black and Moslem who happens along.  With the only possible result being that the society that the middle class wants and works for, will slowly dissolve into third world chaos.  People like Warren need to be locked up not only for their own good, but for the good of our country.  The Left and the Democrat Party is becoming the “New ISIS” in America by creating hate and terror using violence and verbal attacks on free speech, assaulting marriage, “inciting” shootings of the party in power and threatening to overthrow the sitting, legally elected, President every single day.

And am I the only one who finds it all just a bit curious that while your average American citizen can be arrested and thrown into jail for being an “accomplice” to a shooting and/or murder, those in politics, as well as in the state-controlled media, are never held to the same standard.  And in politics we know that if you’re a Democrat you can, quite literally, even get away with murder.  And I would also argue that it is any one of those in the Democrat Party or in the state-controlled media who have constantly been preaching their nonstop hate-filled screed can be said to be just as guilty of “pulling” the trigger on the rifle used to shoot the Republicans at this baseball field as the shooter himself.  And what Warren was doing during her toxic little standup routine was nothing less than to “incite” violence and is actually encouraging her mentally unbalanced followers to go out and commit crimes against the sitting president of the United States.

There was a time when an elected official would have been “censured” by Congress with there being a recommendation for that official to tone down the rhetoric regarding a sitting President. Democrats are now represent the primary danger to the American way of life.  People like Warren scare me.  Because in looking back to where it is that she came from it doesn’t take much time, or effort, to find how mentally warped as well as morally bankrupt Warren really is, not to mention the corruption thrown into the mix.  And yet she is a prominent leader and voice on the Left.  If that isn’t disturbing enough there is also quite the laundry list of prominent Democrats that are just as bad, if not worse. And to make it even more disturbing is the fact that a good portion of the American people continue to believe in this crap.  God help us if the Democrats are ever successful in their attempt to regain control of our government.  That will truly be a very dark day for ALL Americans.

NANCY PELOSI, POSTER CHILD FOR THE PARTY OF HATE…

Democrats 54

What a difference 24 hours can make, especially in the wild, wacky, and rather weird, world of politics where on one day Democrats can seem to be almost human and then on the very day they’re back to being their very typically inhuman selves.  And the reason I bring this up is because it was on this past Wednesday that we saw Nancy Pelosi standing there before her fellow congressmen and deliver a message of unity in the wake of the assassination attempt on Rep. Steve Scalise and other GOP members on that very same morning.  But never fear because it was on the very next day that the Nancy we have all come to know and despise returned to her usual self as she blamed Republicans for creating the stark divisions in the country.  When Pelosi was asked during her press conference on Thursday if both the Left and the Right share mutual responsibility in the divisive rhetoric plaguing the United States, she was quick to respond.  She said, “It didn’t use to be this way. Somewhere in the ‘90s, Republicans decided on a politics of personal destruction as they went after the Clintons and that is the provenance of it. And that’s what has continued.”

It was on Wednesday after Speaker Paul Ryan gave an emotional address before Congress shortly after the shooting that Pelosi, as the esteemed leader of the minority, rose to say, “To my colleagues, you’re going to hear me say something you’ve never heard me say before, I identify myself with the remarks of the speaker.”  She praised unity over diversity saying, “Again, we are not one caucus or the other in this House today, but we speak for each other in saying that we send our thoughts and prayers to our colleague, Steve Scalise.”  Pelosi added, “We will use this occasion as one that brings us together and not [one that] separates us further.”  Now you have to wonder what those present might have been thinking as they listened to old Nancy talking about unity over diversity.  They likely thought that she must have missed the morning dose of her medication.  Either that or I’m sure they must have thought they were trapped in some old episode of the ‘Twilight Zone’ and were waiting for Rod Serling to make his appearance.  As they say truth is often stranger than fiction.  And Pelosi is certainly living proof of that.

But never fear Pelosi ended her ever so brief flirtation with bipartisanship on Thursday when she told her weekly press briefing that Republican concerns about left-wing rhetoric leading to violence were “sanctimonious.”  Pelosi was responding to questions from reporters about criticisms from conservatives about left-wing rhetoric in the aftermath of Wednesday’s shooting at a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, in which four were wounded. The gunman had expressed strident political views common in the left-wing media on his social media accounts.  She said, “If the president says, ‘I can shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and nobody would care,’ when you have somebody say, ‘Beat them up and I’ll pay their legal fees,’ when you have all the assaults that are made on Hillary Clinton.”  She went on to say, “For them to be so sanctimonious is something that I really am almost sad that I had to go down this path with you because I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to have the fullest discussion of it.”  Now of course Pelosi did not bother to provide the context in which Trump made those comments.

Because if you’ll recall then candidate Trump’s remark about “shoot[ing] somebody on Fifth Avenue” was simply a reflection on his own popularity, and was not directed at political opponents.  His “beat them up” comment referred to anti-Trump protesters who deliberately initiated violence at Trump rallies.  And there is no evidence at all of any “assaults” on Hitlery.  Pelosi also claimed that the decline of political rhetoric in the U.S. began in the 1990s, with the Republican-led impeachment of ex-president ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton for perjury after he lied during a legal deposition in a sexual harassment lawsuit.  Pelosi said, “Somewhere in the 1990s, Republicans decided on the politics of personal destruction as they went after the Clintons and that is the provenance of it.”  The truth of the matter is, the politics of personal destruction was begun and perfected by the Left, thanks to the influence of master strategist Saul Alinsky. That has been their modus operandi for decades. Not that she is able to remember that far back. She can’t even remember who the current president is.  But Pelosi is up to something else; doing what Democrats do best: playing the victim.

Also on Thursday Pelosi expressed outrage at her Republican colleagues for implying that Wednesday’s shooting could make for good campaign ads in 2018.  It was also at her weekly press briefing that she said, “I think the comments made by my Republican colleagues is outrageous.”  She said Republicans acting as if they are not contributors to the problem is ridiculous.  And as if trying to prove her idiotic point, Pelosi went on to describe one person who had once threatened her and was later put in jail, saying his behavior toward her was from watching Fox News.  She said, “I think a lot of the vitriol and invective — I mean one of the people who went to jail for threats to me — when he was being tried, his mother said he just watches too much Fox T.V. That’s what she said.”  She added, “They may be inflamed, [but] this mom said it was Fox News.”  Right, it’s all the fault of Fox News.  Yup, the old fall back plan for the Democrats, attack the one news outlet that tends not to spew what is little more than Democrat Party propaganda.  But with the election of Trump it’s these days that even Fox News sounds more like the Clinton News Network (CNN) and MS’LSD’.

And you know, what Pelosi so conveniently leaves out of her idiotic little rant is the fact that DNC/Hitlery campaign actually PAID people to disrupt candidate Trump’s campaign speeches and deprive his audience of their right to hear his message.  They disrupted and interrupted him to the point where he could barely get out more than a few sentences at a time.  Since he was paying out of his own pocket for the venues he spoke at, who wouldn’t react as he did to such rude paid protesters.  When Trump said “I’ll pay your legal fees”, he was talking to an audience member who got “flipped off” by a protester on his way out after being ejected. What man wouldn’t react exactly as President Trump did.  What a pathetic hypocrite Pelosi is.  Pelosi, Schumer, Perez and their socialist ilk should be worried for two reasons: (1) their brightest advisors are warning about how liberal/socialist behavior is going to alienate the voters there in flyover country; and (2) they realize they have never actually talked to anyone in flyover country, so what can they say to people who they seem to despise.  All they know is that flyover country is that vast electoral wasteland that lies between New York and California.

Look, I have no trouble with people getting old and forgetful or becoming afflicted with dementia, and the like.  It happens to many of us.  But when those people hold positions of responsibility and influence in government, it becomes something else altogether, and they ought to choose to step down willingly or be removed from their position.  However, it’s in the case of Pelosi there was more than enough damage done and division involved before age or dementia ever became any kind of a factor.  Regardless of the history, she ought to be removed.  People in her condition, like Maxine Waters, really contribute nothing positive to the picture, and serve only to further divide this nation.  Considering where it is that Pelosi’s district lies it should not surprise that there are enough nutjobs to ensure she continually gets re-elected, and it’s odd that no Democrat has yet realized that she is a huge liability to them.  With their “influential positions”, their downhill agendas, their disregard for the life of the unborn and those who don’t buy into their ungodly ideas and programs, they certainly do their part in bending society farther and farther and farther away from truth and goodness.

Leftists say they can’t be fascists because they’re leftists, not right-wingers.  Rebuke: It’s their Brown Shirt street thuggish behavior and their actions that determines their fascist label, not their political paradigm.  Make no mistake about it, Fascism, which is ideological hate and violence, did not die with Hitler and Mussolini in WWII, it is alive and well and practiced to near perfection by those on the left.  The Democrat Party is the sponsor and creator of the KKK and Jim Crow.  And it is the party that voted against the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act.  If not for the Republicans LBJ would have failed to get these two acts passed into law.  Add to that the Democrat acceptance of KKK member Robert Byrd into their party.  Had he been a Republican there would have been an uproar but, Democrats said nothing.  Facts are stubborn things, and history is proof that Democrats are the racist scum that is ruining this country. They show up in the ghetto every two years to stump for votes and make all these promises. The next time these people see or hear from these cowards is the next election. President Trump hit it right on the head, what has the Democrat Party done for blacks in the last fifty years?  Nothing!

Progressivism, liberalism, or whatever you want to call it has become an ideology of power. And it is as long as liberals hold power that principles simply don’t matter.  Leftists are Fascists.  Fascists are Haters.  Haters hate, that’s what they do.  It’s their fuel, that’s all they have because they are consistently wrong about absolutely everything.  And when there are those who are able to recognize just how truly wrong they are, on top of being unable to accept their electoral defeats, especially when their socialist globalist statist bureaucracy agenda is being dismantled, what is it that the fascists always do?  They act upon their inherent intolerant violent reaction instinct-brown shirted street thug terror tactics.  Look at all the violence that occurred over the course of the last eight years.  And nearly all of it had as it main perpetrators, members of the left.  From the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement, to the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement and everything in between, what we have witnessed is the preferred method of those on the left for ‘protesting’ perceived injustices.  The result of which is always looting, violence and the incredible destruction of private property.

The Democrats have always been full of hate, from working to keep slavery all the way to present day, nothing has really changed in the way the Democrat Party operates.  And they not only depend on the ignorance of their voters, they foster it, because it’s what allows them to continue.  They don’t ever give inspiring speeches to instill in people how it is up to them to make something of their life.  Instead they tell their followers that they’ll never be able to make it on their own, because they believe they’re too stupid.  Meanwhile conservatives say to sit back and take the easy way out by depending on the government get nowhere but dependent upon that same government.  And they say that we’re all are smart enough to make it in life, you just need to stand up and be determined and motivated to do so.  Democrats don’t care about kids or people, or about watch people genuinely succeed in life.  Because successful folks don’t ‘need’ the Democrats’ to tell them what or how to think.  Democrats want to control the people, to tell you where you can live, what you can eat and how to live your life.  What they’re selling is a modern day slavery, where the new ‘master’ would be much more powerful and far more cruel than masters of old.