AND THE MELTDOWN INTENSIFIES…

777

It’s getting to be where every time I see some Democrat on television it’s becoming more and more difficult to take them seriously.  Most are now sounding borderline psychotic.  And the fact that at least some of these people are in positions of power should cause every American, regardless of party affiliation, to be more than a little uneasy to say the least.  Never have I seen so many people, come so unraveled, and remain that way for so long, over losing an election.  It’s all become so very bizarre.  These Democrats have now reduced themselves to being little more than a parody of their former selves.  Every time I see Chuckie Schumer or that other nutbag, Maxine Waters, I want to laugh but can’t because the danger people like them have now come to represent is quite unnerving.

Which brings me to the most recent event to cause nearly the entire Democrat Party to move just that much closer to the edge.  That being, of course, the firing of James Comey, by President Trump, which occurred just yesterday.  So just days after testifying before Congress with news that Hitlery aide Mrs. Anthony Weiner had shared classified e-mails with her then-still-husband, Comey got that ax.  White House press secretary Sean Spicer said, “The president has accepted the recommendation of the attorney general and the deputy attorney general regarding the dismissal of the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”  End of story!  The firing will be good news for Trump voters who elected him to “drain the swamp” and they will no doubt be asking what took him so long.

And just to add a little perspective here, it was Chuck Schumer, back in November, who told Bloomberg that he no longer had confidence in the abilities of Comey following his decision to reopen an investigation into Hitlery’s emails.  It was then that he said, “I do not have confidence in him any longer.”  And he added, “To restore my faith, I am going to have to sit down and talk to him and get an explanation for why he did this.”  And it was Nancy Pelosi who told CNN, also back in November, that he was no longer suited to the position of FBI Director.  And again is was following Comey’s reopening of Hitlery’s email investigation that she said, “Maybe he’s not in the right job.”  Going on to say, “I think that we have to just get through this election and just see what the casualties are along the way.”

And then we had former Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders who told ABC’s ‘This Week’ as recently as this past January that in his opinion Comey should consider resigning having acted in an “outrageous way” during the presidential election.  Bernie said, “I think he should take a hard look at what he has done. And I think it would not be a bad thing for the American people if he did step down.”  And it was he who went on to say, “I think that Comey acted in an outrageous way during the campaign and, you know, no one can say that this was decisive and this was what elected Trump, but clearly his behavior during the campaign in terms of what he said in the week or two before the election was unacceptable.”  So the hypocrisy of those on the left becomes all too difficult to simply ignore.

I think we can all agree that the reputation of the FBI first started circling the drain back in the early 1990s when Louis Freeh decided to hand over to Hitlery and ‘The Slickmeister’ hundreds of confidential FBI files, aka ‘Filegate’.  And it has been going downhill, and pretty steadily, ever since.  And let’s get real here, shall we?  The only reason that the Democrats now have their panties in such a wad is because they have now have one less stooge working for them on the inside.  Comey has been an embarrassment to the FBI and to law enforcement in general for some time.  In truth Comey is a longtime member of the ‘Clinton Crime Syndicate’ going all the way back to when ‘Slick Willy’ was the governor.  He’s essentially the ONLY reason the Clinton’s didn’t go to prison during their White Water scandal.

And it is a fact that it was more than a few FBI agents who had come to have zero confidence in Comey.  How could they, after he essentially let Hitlery go because there was no “intent?”  And after he created what was a class of aristocracy essentially “above the law?”  And the timing could not have been more perfect.  Trump waited until Comey had discredited himself beyond any question, and then he fired him.  That’s how it’s done.  No one can call Trump a dictator running a purge, although the media and Democrats will certainly try.  We are in the middle of a minefield that took decades to lay, and it’s going to take more than 100, 200 or even 1460 days to dismantle it so future generations will not be forced to contend with it.  And the Democrats will continue to yelp like the scalded dogs that they are as we work to do just that.

And those on the left continue to spin and so fast I can no longer keep up.  I mean does the left not like Comey and he think he should be gone because he lost Hitlery the presidency or is it that the left loves Comey and firing him is wrong because of a Trump investigation that’s going nowhere?  I’m so confused. First they blamed Comey for Hitlery’s defeat in the election, but now he will become their martyr as they continue their attempts to undermine Trump.  The left is so used to keeping people on the job who do nothing but to continually fail the country.  In the real world, if you don’t do your job, you’re replaced or fired.  Sooner or later, you replace a worn out tire and put on a new one.  Plain and simple, President Trump is going to work and Comey can’t protect Democrats anymore, and especially Hitlery.

And in trying to wrap things up I would just like to mention, although I’m sure I’m likely to be stating the obvious, that if it had been Barry who had been the one to fire Comey, not a peep would have been heard from a single Democrat, and there is not one who would have been critical of the decision.  And then you have those in the Republican Party, our cadre of ‘establishment’ RINOs who will do anything to get those in the state-controlled media to like them.  If only they would instead choose to show a little discipline, and maybe a little backbone.  The state-controlled media only loves them when they are attacking their own, and will never support them against the Democrats.  You’d have thought the McCain example would have been a valuable lesson learned, but even McCain himself seems to have learned nothing.

And all of these RINO’s now choosing to join the Democrats in taking sides against the president are really nothing more than Democrats in Republican clothing.  And as we all know, RINOs are, as RINOs do.  They’re just a pathetic bunch of backstabbing, power tripping, ankle biting, media whores.  And the biggest whore of the entire bunch, aka the Democrat’s official Republican mouth-piece, is none other than John McCain who can now be heard calling for a Special Prosecutor, which is exactly what the Democrats really want.  Maybe we should have that ‘special prosecutor’ look into what has been McCain’s way too long political career.  That might prove to be far more interesting than anything President Trump has ever done!  After all, we know he’s not exactly the war hero he’s always portrayed himself as being.

And I must say that I agree 100 percent with all those who view our Republicans in Congress, or at least the majority of them, as being the biggest bunch of gutless wonders ever elected to public office, at any level.  They fight for absolutely nothing.  Their biggest concern is doing all that they can in their effort to keep the Democrats from calling them racist and bigoted, so they cave on nearly everything.  I am predicting a lot of new faces in the Republican after 2018.  And if there are not then we the voters really are as stupid as the Democrats and RINOs think we are.  No matter what you may think of Trump the main focus come 2018 must not be to elect anymore Democrats.  The focus must be on replacing as many RINOs as we can in the House and every RINO that’s up for re-election in the Senate, with conservatives.  That’s the fix that we need.

And finally if it’s the timing of Comey’s firing that seems to have old Chuckie Schumer and so many of his fellow Democrats so wrapped around the axle, then let me help them all out.  You want timing, ok Chuckie, here’s your damn timing:

  1. Trump elected and he knew then that Comey had to go.
  2. He wanted this decision to come from Comey’s new boss, the yet-to-be approved DOJ, Jeff Sessions.
  3. Sessions is approved but under intense political pressure must recuse himself regarding the high profile ongoing case being investigated by Comey, and couldn’t fire Comey without backlash.
  4. Rosenstein is appointed and approved as Asst. DOJ.
  5. Trump asks Sessions to give Rosenstein the job of evaluating Comey and to then make recommendations.
  6. Rosenstein finishes his evaluation and recommends firing Comey.
  7. BOOM. Done deal.
  8. Hitlery and friends begin to crap in their diapers
  9. Grand jury is finally convened
  10. Indictments are issued

There’s your timing, Chuckie.  Are you and your merry band of hypocrites happy now?  Now all we need is a little follow through regarding 8, 9 and 10.  Let’s make that happen!

DEMOCRATS GOING IN CIRCLES???

762

So while his boss is out on what can only be described as a ‘garbage-mouth’ tour with Bernie, it was the second in command of the DNC who was out telling folks that much of the blame for his party’s electoral failures of the last several years can be place that the feet of Barack Hussein Obama.  No man, tell me it isn’t so.  So are we to assume that this nutjub-Moslem Brotherhood-supporting-Socialist-of-a-Democrat has finally come to his senses?  It was on Wednesday of this week that Ellison, at an event held at the University of Minnesota, said, “Barack Obama could have been a better party leader, and I think the fact that he wasn’t has put his legacy in jeopardy.”

It was in our last presidential contest that Ellison chose to back Bernie over Hitlery and he was also an early supporter of Barry Obummer.  But he seemed to be singing a somewhat different tune this week as he said that the former president’s failure to lead the Democrat Party led to steep losses at the national level as well as in state houses across the country.  He said, “His true legacy is in danger, and I think he can’t say that he wasn’t part of those losses. I mean, who else?”  Frankly, if there is one thing that absolutely needs to be done, and as quickly as is humanly possible, it is the complete erasure of all that is recognized as being Barry’s “true legacy”.

And something else this week that struck me as being a little confusing was how on Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” New York Times White House Correspondent Glenn Thrush reported, “my inbox this morning’s been flooded by Democrats who are sort of saying Ossoff was a terrible candidate.”  Thrush said, “[W]hat is interesting is my inbox this morning’s been flooded by Democrats who are sort of saying Ossoff was a terrible candidate.”  Granted the guy is pretty far to the left, and was a big Bernie for president supporter, but the one thing he had going for him was that at least he was under 60 years of age.

Anyway this Thrush guy went on to say, “[H]e was not electric. He was more static electric. But I think, in general, that is an issue. Look, the other thing is, look how deep the bench was down there. There were a lot of people who wanted that seat. I think the larger issue that we’re dealing with here right now, is the fact that the Democrats just don’t have a lot of candidates, not just in Georgia, but around the country in general. There’s not a lot of people to kind of catch this Trump wave.”   So I’m curious, if not Ossoff, then who?  Who is it that all of the leftwing complainers might have preferred to see run as the Democrat in this particular race?

And while I have never considered myself in any way a fan of Barry, I must admit that he was responsible for getting more Republicans elected than Ronald Reagan, and he singlehandedly convinced millions of Americans to become proud gun owners.  So I guess in the big scheme of things he wasn’t all bad.  But that said, I find it rather priceless how Democrats are now all busy blaming each other and refuse to accept the very real fact that it was their progressive platform and the direction in which they insist upon taking this country that is the primary reason behind their numerous electoral failures.  This didn’t just happen with Trump.

It was Barry who gave America her first real taste of progressive socialism, and most Americans chose to spit it right back at him and his party.  The losses the Democrats have suffered over the years should make it clear to even the most devoted leftist that the socialist platform was not accepted.  Perhaps if the Democrats were to ditch the snowflakes and then attempt to rebuild their party without the free giveaways, the anti-white, anti-cop, anti-religion and anti-gun platform, the Democrats might once again meet with some level of electoral success.  But if they stick with what hasn’t worked they will continue to wander in the political wilderness.

But look, I do think that it might be more than a little unfair to put all of the blame on Barry.  After all, he did have plenty of help.  There was ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid, Chuckie Schumer, and Nancy ‘Botox Eats Your Brain’ Pelosi to name just three of his very loyal comrades. The focus of the Democrat Party was, and in some respects remains, on such things as restrooms usage, open borders and Moslem refugees, meanwhile unemployment is sky high and health care costs are going through the roof and crime is skyrocketing.  And Barry’s many scandals didn’t help either and then there are all those other issues the DNC refuses to address.

But you have to admit, if Barry was anything over the course of his presidency, it’s that at least he was consistent.  He lead the DNC with the same “You didn’t build that” administrative thinking that he did the country.  And it was this hapless boob, Ellison, who did everything he could to support the 2008 Democrat ‘vote by color’ campaign.  He can’t now run from the failure of 98% of the black electorate voting solely on the basis of color.  And shaming the other Democrats to join in with hints and accusations of racism.  They got their guy. They got the anti-American outlook they wanted.  Ellison and the rest of the DNC own the failure that that produced.

The Democrat Party attracts followers, and maintains their base, with a carrot dangled in front of numerous but separate groups of people, each with their own pet desires; free this and that, free college, gay marriage, abortion on demand etc.  They don’t openly reveal their true party platform, which is to create a true socialist government and a country with no borders.  If and when that goal is achieved they will move on to their ultimate Utopia; a single world socialist government under the control of a “benevolent”, totalitarian, non-elected and self-perpetuating board of directors.  A world stripped of all feelings of “nationalism”.

Far be it from me to offer up any advice to Mr. Ellison, but it would seem to me that if he has a legitimate beef with Obummer it would be that Obummer was perhaps a bit too quick to reveal a little too much about “The Plan” which Obummer intended to implement once he was elected.  I mean it was even before he was elected that he announced that his plan would be to “fundamentally transform the United States of America!”  And what were the first things he set about doing, with a Democrat controlled Congress right behind him?  It was to pass a bogus ‘stimulus’ bill that was nothing more than a kick back to all those who chose to support him and Obamacare.

And as for this Ossoff guy down in Georgia 6th district, I’m not quite sure why there are those who thought he was such a bad candidate.  Personally he wasn’t my cup of tea because he wanted amnesty for illegals, but then I’m not a Democrat.  That’s nothing more than a slap in the face for many immigrants who have worked and sacrificed a great deal, to follow our immigrations laws, and did things the right way. America loves immigrants, however, we love immigrants that follow our laws. Just as other countries expect us to follow their laws, we should be no different, in that aspect.  As Americans we are expected to uphold the laws of our land.

Ossoff openly said he did not mind our laws being broken, and actually favored rewarding those same law breakers by giving them amnesty.  Every government/state official, needs to understand that they serve the people.  This guy has not taken that stand.  He chose to placate his party, instead of being the servant of the people and for the people, we the American citizens.  We want our country, our traditions, our jobs, and basically, our way of life back.  And we don’t just want it for ourselves, we want it for future generations who are not embarrassed about our culture, and in being an American citizen. We want to help our President Make America Great Again!

The most worrisome part for me is the sheer number of people out there who are either not educated enough or are either unable to, or refuse to, recognize what is truly going on in this country and who actually believe every word they hear from those in our state-controlled media. Those are the folks who the Democrats and the media are really speaking to!  If only people could use a little logic and a liitle commonsense!  But nope!  You’d think people would be pretty tired and fed up with all of the negativity being thrown at them!  Or fed up with being told every day how stupid they are!  Because that is what those in the media are really doing!

For me, and I can assume for all those who voted for Trump, it gets rather tiresome hearing them tell me, ad nauseam, that the President we voted for sucks and that we were stupid for having voted for him.  And if we would only listen to them and understand what it is that they telling us, they would come to prove it to us!!  And te fact that they have to make things up and create any number of ‘fake news’ stories in their effort to convince us seems to matter very little to them.  I mean how would they like to be told, on a daily basis, that they are a racist or a misogynist or a homophobe or to be slandered in some other way?

And finally, this current state of disarray in which the Democrat Party now finds itself is not going to last for long.  And I wish I could say that the Republicans were able to recognize that fact and begin to react accordingly and to be a bit more aggressive in trying to seize what I consider as being nothing less than a golden opportunity.  An opportunity to work on consolidating their power in Washington and to work harder to move forward with the conservative agenda, but quite frankly they seem to be in nearly the same state of disarray as the Democrats.  Our country is quite literally hanging by a thread and it’s conservatism that is the only thing that will save it.

HEY HITLERY, FACE IT, YOU LOST BECAUSE YOU SUCK!!!

Hillary 1

The fact that Hitlery lost to Donald Trump remains a very bitter pill for her to swallow even five months later.  To this day she continues to dream up excuse after excuse as to why it was that she lost to this guy, Trump.  And it was during her first public interview since that humiliating defeat, with Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, that Hitlery has come up with what she says are the four major reasons which “were beyond her control,” in trying to justify why the American people rejected her.

And those four reasons are:

  1. Russia. She said, “A foreign power meddled with our election,” going so far as to actually label it “an act of aggression.” She called for an independent, bipartisan investigation into the Kremlin’s involvement and said the probe should examine whether there was collusion with the Trump campaign.
  2. Misogyny. Hitlery said, “Certainly, misogyny played a role. That has to be admitted.” And she added that “some people — women included — had real problems” with the idea of a woman president.
  3. James Comey. Hitlery cited as damaging to her campaign his unusual decision to release of a letter on October 28, less than two weeks before Election Day, that said he was looking at additional emails related to the FBI probe of the former secretary of state’s use of a private server.
  4. WikiLeaks. Weeks of disclosures of stolen emails from the personal account of then-Hitlery campaign chairman John Podesta, were particularly harmful, Hitlery said, adding that it “played a much bigger role than I think many people yet understand.”

The only responsibility she took was to say, “There were things I could have done better.”  What, like maybe choosing to actually campaign instead of fundraise?  Or perhaps not worked to avoid the press for nearly a year?  And yet Hitlery can still describe, and with a straight face no less, her loss as “devastating.”  NBC News says that Hitlery is writing a book to “examine her defeat last year” and inferred she is doubtful she will ever run for office again.  Yet there’s already talk of a 2020 run.

And then it was during a question and answer session before something called the ‘Women in the World Summit’ on this past Thursday, that Hitlery again brought up the subject of misogyny as she argued that “it is fair to say…that, certainly, misogyny played a role. I mean, that just has to be admitted.”  I am a conservative the my reason for not voting for Hitlery had nothing more to do with her being a woman than my not voting for Barry was because he’s black.  It was because both are Socialists!

Hitlery responded to a question on gender and the 2016 election by saying, “I don’t know that there is one answer, let’s be clear. I think there — you know, in any campaign, there are so many different crosscurrents and events, and some have greater impact than others. But, it is fair to say…that, certainly, misogyny played a role. I mean, that just has to be admitted. And why, and what the underlying reasons were is what I’m trying to parse out myself.”  What a bunch of malarkey!!!

Look, she can come up with as many excuses as she wants regarding how it was that she came to lose an election that so many were so sure that she would win, and very handily so.  But with that said, no one can deny the fact that she had 90% of the news media behind her as well as 90% of Hollyweird, 90% of foreign leaders, and even half of the Republican Party openly cheering her on and simultaneously attacking Trump as the worst human being God ever put on this Earth.  Constantly and for over a year!

Yet she comes up with a few isolated incidences as the reason she lost.  Let’s be very clear here: The fact that she lost by ANY margin whatsoever, considering she had the greatest amount of help from the media in the history of mankind, means she was one of the worst candidates ever to run.  For a woman up to her eyeballs in all manner of political chicanery, she should not be publicly demanding investigations. This woman got a free pass from Comey and Lynch, but now she blames Comey for her defeat?

Comey, himself, is a longtime associate of the Clinton clan and as such is severely tainted.  President Trump needs to fire him, get a new FBI director and reopen the investigation and put Hitlery away for good.  And of course the fact that she has a long history of dishonesty and corruption, along with a team of people well versed in the world of dirty politics. Not to mention the fact that she has long treated millions of voting Americans with a level of disdain that is all too familiar among socialists.

Yes, Hitlery, by all means, blame everyone and everything but yourself.  Typical of socialist liberals, it’s always everyone else’s fault, they don’t like to ever take any responsibility. This is only one of the reasons why Hitlery is not the president and Donald Trump is.  She thinks she is some kind of “queen” who can do no wrong, that everyone should bow and vote for her just because she is a woman and a Clinton. She actually thinks she “deserves” to be president rather than trying to “earn” the right.

Nope, no jet setting around on our dime in a position only given to her because she made a deal to back down so a weak, know nothing ‘community agitator’ who is black could be the first black president, although he too did nothing to earn that position.  No Hitlery, people who voted against you don’t hate women, they just hate you!  Even if misogyny did play a role, it was dwarfed by the fact that half the country has enough commonsense not to vote for a manifestly corrupt, pathological liar.

Let’s face it, you just can’t fix stupid. She lost because she’s a lying criminal, had no accomplishments in life, other than to scam millions of dollars, and because people rejected her ideology.  She ran after eight years of her party in the white house and failing.  Her policies where all more of the same.  Voters where sick of being called racist and sexist every day.  But it’s just easier for her to claim she was cheated.  The left can never admit they’re wrong even when every poll on every issue proves it.

And what does it say about a candidate so tainted by corruption, lying and incompetence that even a dishonest media couldn’t get her the win?  It couldn’t be because she was so lazy she didn’t even campaign in many Blue states or because she called people in middle-America “deplorable.  I don’t vote for someone just because they have a vagina just like I didn’t vote for someone just because of the color of their skin. I vote for people for people who I feel I can trust, which Hitlery is not!

And if by misogyny she means to say, “I’m a tired, old, worn-out hag of a candidate; I have no new positive views, only old negative ones; I am a serial enabler for a serial rapist and pedophile husband; I have bilked the world out of multiple millions of dollars; I have repeatedly lied to everyone, all the way up to Congress and the FBI; I have endangered Americans abroad; I have allowed foreign governments to obtain classified info through my stupidity”, well then I guess she’d be absolutely correct.

NANCY PELOSI, THE IDEAL POSTER CHILD FOR THE ‘MENTALLY ILL’…

Pelosi 03

I’ve often heard, and read, that liberalism is essentially little more than the equivalent of a mental disorder, and what I’ve seen over the past few months, since the last election, I kinda have to agree.  Apparently it’s an affliction that most often strikes while one is still in their teenage years and then later is either cured of once one acquires certain responsibilities or continues to live out life with the disease continuing to slowly metastasize until one becomes like Nancy Pelosi, a raving lunatic.

And in an effort to demonstrate just how far gone Pelosi has now become, I point to her most recent weekly press conference, the one that took place this past Thursday, during which she took the opportunity to take pot shots at Republican lawmakers for taking a two-week recess for the Easter-Passover holidays.  Pelosi said, “Today, here we are, 77 days.”  And then she continued to ramble on by saying, “The Republican House departs for a two-week break now for the Easter-Passover holidays.”

She then went on to say, “I’ll begin by asking the same questions that Republicans will face from their constituents.”  And then she said, “What have the Republicans done with their control of the House, Senate and the White House to produce jobs?”  She said, “Where are the jobs?  Show us the jobs. Democrats believe we should focus on every day on job creation and growing paychecks for everyone, everywhere in our country.”  And yet, what was it that they focused on when they were in total control?

I guess my first question here would be to ask if Pelosi actually receives a copy of the monthly jobs report.  And if she does, does she not bother reading it.  Now it’s possible that over the last eight years it’s something she likely gotten out of the habit of doing, since it was a period of time during which far more jobs were lost than were created, and roughly 10 million Americans actually left the workforce because they couldn’t find a job and simply gave up looking.  But, that was then and this is now.

So what exactly is she talking about? The jobs are there, the reports show it.  Perhaps a better question to ask is what have the Democrats done in those same 77 days to repair Obamacare?  Obamacare exchanges are disappearing faster than Democrats from elected office, and some areas of the country will soon to be left, or have already been left, with no insurance exchanges whatsoever!  What have they done to clean up their mess?  Make no mistake it’s Democrats like Pelosi who own Obamacare!

I have to wonder if Pelosi’s staff or her speech writers have any input into what it is that she says.  Where are the jobs?  Does she or your staff not read the newspapers or read the government reports from Dept. of Labor?  Or is she just that stupid or dishonest?  I guess we can look for Nancy to be wandering around the empty halls of Congress during the next two weeks, just slaving away focusing on jobs while her fellow party of obstructionist slugs, and utter hypocrites, also go away for two weeks?

The real problem here is that those in the Democrat Party are genuinely nuts.  And I would even go so far as to say that some of them should probably be locked up.  Pelosi talks of infrastructure and it hasn’t even been three months.  What did Barry do for eight years, just how many of those supposed ‘shovel-ready’ projects ever actually materialized?  All he did was to give tax payers money to other countries and invite all the immigrants in and gave them healthcare, food stamps and welfare checks.

The Democrats had a president in office for eight long years and funny they weren’t too concerned about creating jobs then, and only pretended that they did.  Their president, Barry, was little more than the Jobs-Killer-in-Chief.  And yet at the end of every month, when the bogus jobs report hit the street, they all cheered knowing full well that the report was nothing more than a bunch of manipulated numbers the purpose of which was to create the impression of a rapidly improving economy.

Now that Trump is president and is actually creating real jobs for the American people while revoking job killing regulations, it’s all of a sudden that Democrats are now worried about creating jobs.  Democrats are liars and continue to demonstrate just how desperate they truly are.  They’ll say anything to get elected.  For example, remember when Hitlery said she would put the coal miners out of business.  Then she said, “I have always been for the coal miners. They took my words out of context.”

Pelosi exhibits that same ideological flaw that is possessed by essentially all Democrats in that she actually believes that a job cannot exist without there being significant intervention by the government.  What she completely swings and misses on is that the Republicans actually help a lot just by not adding to the massive amount of regulations already on the books.  Business owners now know that some level of relief from the threat of ever increasing taxes and regulations is on the way.

Let’s be real, Democrats care very little about jobs.  The only thing they wish to do is create more government dependents who will then vote for them.  They want to lower requirements again, to get food stamps, as Barry did, they want to extend unemployment ‘benefits’ for another year, as Barry did, they want to provide ‘free’ medical care for everyone, they want ‘free’ college tuition for everyone, they want ‘free’ public transportation for everyone and they want to expand public housing.

If they truly cared about jobs, the why did Barry, throughout nearly his entire eight years in office seem to go out of his way to make it more difficult for businesses to hire?  Businesses could not expand because the associated costs of Obamacare was a job killer and his ‘economic policies lead to millions of work eligible Americans giving up even looking for work.  Democrats want to keep their voters on the plantation and addicted to all manner of government handouts.  And jobs make that more difficult.

WHEN IS IT OK TO PAY A WOMAN LESS THAN YOU PAY A MAN? WHEN YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT…

Warren 2

So is it like some old Native American custom to pay women less than you pay men?  Or, does choosing to do such a thing have much more to do with something that we are all far more familiar with?  That being, of course, that this is yet another instance where we have some scumbag Democrat saying, “Do as I say, not as I do.”  Now in case you’re wondering what it is that I’m going to be talking about here, it was just a couple of days ago that every single female Democrat in the Senate celebrated “Equal Pay Day,” that ridiculous, fake feminist day of protest when liberals pretend that women really do have it hard in America.

National Review does a great job of refuting their bogus claims:  “According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2014 the average full-time working woman earned 83 percent of what the average full-time working man earned. That’s up from about 80 percent in 2004…

But the far bigger flaw in Equal Pay Day logic is the assumption that the Department of Labor statistic showing the differences in men and women’s average earnings is evidence of discrimination’s role in our economy. The holiday’s champions use the mantras “equal pay for equal work” and “83 cents on the dollar” to imply that women are regularly being paid less than men for the same work. That’s just not what the statistic tells us. The Department of Labor doesn’t compare two co-workers, one male and one female, but rather simply tallies up the median earnings of all full-time working women and all full-time working men and compares the two.”

And you now, what none of these whiners and complainers bother to take into account is the fact “that the average man working full-time spends two hours more each week on the job than does the average full-time working woman.”  So what they are really saying here, that men maybe shouldn’t get paid for those extra two hours per day?  I mean we are once again delving pretty deeply into yet another example of leftwing lunacy.  And at what point is there going to be someone finally willing to throw liberal hypocrisy flag.  Why aren’t the Democrats ever forced to play by the same rules that they force the rest of us to play by?

Nevertheless, Democrats love to spout all manner of misleading statistics as they relate to the nation’s women in order to create antipathy in them toward men, Republicans, their employers, and, pretty much, the world in general.  And it was the two esteemed senators from California who took time out of their schedule to acknowledge the day on Twitter.  Senator Feinstein Tweeted, “California has enacted the country’s most progressive fair pay law. Congress must follow our lead.”  And Senator Harris also Tweeted, “While more education can help increase women’s earnings, it still doesn’t close the gender pay gap.”

Wait a minute, did I say every female Democrat did?  Come to think of it I’m mistaken because, apparently, there was one rather glaring exception.  That of course being the senior senator from Massachusetts, Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren, who didn’t say a word about it for the first time since she was elected to the office.  Now you may ask why was it that she was suddenly silent?  Well I’m no mind reader, but it might have something to do with the fact that it was recently revealed that the women in her office get paid a mere $.71 for every $1 a man earns, or roughly $20,000 a year less.  Ouch!  That could be really embarrassing for her.  Just sayin’.

It’s The Free Beacon that reported it this way, saying, “Warren has used Equal Pay Day, which fell on April 4 this year, in years past as an opportunity to speak out on the gender pay gap. Last year she took to the Senate floor to call Equal Pay Day a “national day of embarrassment” and pledged to continue her “fight” until the pay gap was erased. She gave similar statements on Equal Pay Day in 2015, 2014, and 2013, her first year in the Senate.”  Might the lack of her being so vocal about an issue we all thought was near and dear to her heart perhaps be nothing more than an attempt to stay below the radar now that we know she is a major offender.

Sometimes politics hands you moments of delicious hilarity that are just too fleeting to properly appreciate, but this is a story that keeps on giving.  Like most of the grievances put forth by the left there’s simply no factual basis for it. Personally, I’m thinking that all men should quit work and let the women carry the load.  That way men could spend much more of their time fishing, golfing, and drinking beer, and these political hack women could shut their big mouths about how everything is just so darned unequal.  Or, if we can have a day without women how about we a day maybe we could have a day without men and see which has the bigger impact.

But Warren is far from being the only female Democrat to tends to pay her female staff members less than she pays the men who work for her.  After all, it was she who was supposed to have won the last election, none other than Hitlery Clinton, who was also found to be paying the ladies less than she was paying the men on her staff.  And then as we all know how it was that Barry was paying his female staffers less than the men.  So it would seem that as long as one is a Democrat there’s no real equal pay issue that one has to be concerned about, it’s only a rule that everyone else needs to be made to abide by.  Just one more thing on a long list of very many.

ARE THE DEMOCRATS ACCOMPLISHING ANYTHING OTHER THAN TO DRIVE THEMSELVES EVEN FURTHER INTO THE WILDERNESS???

Democrats 52

So here we are nearly five months after the election and roughly two and half months after President Donald Trump’s inauguration and still the vast majority of Democrats, as well as more than just a few sinister Republican ‘NeverTrumpers’, remain so addled by the fact that their favored candidate actually lost the last election that they seem to actually prefer self-induced banishment to some political wasteland.  Like those who thought the landing on the moon was a fake, they remain focused on what can only be described as some twisted fascination based on some of the most preposterous conspiracy theories ever conceived, while the real story, the illegal leaks of classified intelligence involving American citizens, goes completely ignored in most of the state-controlled media and everywhere in the political establishment.

We all know, or at least we should know by now, and by heart, the blatantly hypocritical scenario they continue to advance.  It goes something like this: Vlad Putin, filled with hatred of Hitlery for criticizing and sanctioning him for his invasions of his neighbors’ territories, “hacked” the election in order to tilt the outcome to Donald Trump. Trump, after all, said some vaguely nice things about Vlad during the campaign, and most likely has secret dodgy business interests in Russia. Several of Trump’s friends probably do too, and so they cooperated with Russian intelligence, its WikiLeaks minions, and its propaganda rag Russia Today to smear Hitlery and the Democrats.  And, don’t forget, it’s likely Vlad has some embarrassing untold information on Trump he can use later to blackmail the president.  Sound about right?

Now while most intelligent individuals view this conspiracy theory as something right out of the ‘Twilight Zone’, those in the Democrat Party, assisted by their many minions in the state-controlled media, continue use of the phrase “hacked the election” as being their way to create the impression that voting machines were meddled with, which is of course nothing but blatant propaganda and only serves to confirm the continuing lack of any real evidence.  Of course Russia tried to influence the election, just as it has tried to influence every American election since the 1930s.  And we have tried, and continue to try, to influence elections in other countries.  Have Democrats already forgotten how it was that Barry, in 2015, interfered in Israel’s elections with the soul purpose of trying to defeat Benjamin Netanyahu?

As for Americans colluding with Russia during an election, where was all of this moral outrage when back in 1983 Teddy ‘The Drunken Pervert’ Kennedy offered Soviet premier Yuri Andropov a little quid pro quo?  And it was reports regarding the deal that described it saying, “Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.”  Kennedy also offered to visit Russia and help them with access to the American media.  But hey, excuse we’re always offered is that that was a different time.  And besides, Kennedy was a Democrat and the then president was a Republican so, as we all know, anything that takes place under such circumstances is always seen as strictly fair play.  Right?

And don’t you just love the selective amnesia on display from the Democrats when it comes to who it was that was truly chummy with old Vlad Putin, and that would be, of course, none other than Barry “Almighty” and, his trusty sidekick, Hitery.  After all, who was it that removed all those missile-defense installations from Poland and the Czech Republic; or worked on that “reset” of relations that had soured because of Russian territorial theft in Georgia and Moldova?  And remember, too, how it was that Barry, in 2012, asked Russian president Dmitri Medvedev to assure Vlad of his coming “flexibility” after the election.  All of which comprise evidence of Barry’s blatant appeasement and which is far more solid than the innuendo and rumor supposedly proving Trump colluded with Vlad to skew the election in his favor.

And, oh-by-the-way, let’s not forget Hitlery’s foundation/sleazy slush fund, which in exchange for just a little over $2 Million in contributions to that wonderful little foundation/slush fund run by her and her family, helped a Russian uranium-mining company, Rosatom, execute a take-over of “uranium mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West,” as the New York Times reported, making “Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers” and bringing “Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.”  Where were the five-alarm bells over allowing a geopolitical rival to gain such a critical weapons advantage?  And yet it’s now that we’re hearing claims, made by Democrats, that it’s likely that at least some Trump associates WILL face jail time?

As for the hacking of the DNC computers, I guess I’d be asking the question, so what?  Was any of the embarrassing information that was released actually proven to be false?  The answer to that would be a very resounding, ‘NO!’  And was it somehow Trump’s fault that the DNC was so sloppy and careless regarding their cyber security, or so catty and snarky about their fellow Democrats?  Again, ‘NO!’  And weren’t the American people better off for having heard most of the information that came via WikiLeaks?  I would argue that, yes they were!  Would they have ever heard it from the media?  And dare I say that Bernie and his fans benefitted as much as did Trump, since the leaks proved their contention that a corrupt Democrat establishment was skewing the nomination for Hitlery with the collusion of the state-controlled media.

Seriously folks, does anybody really think that voters in some counties in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania changed their vote only because they learned of DNC ineptitude and corruption?  Hardly!  Isn’t there a much easier, as well as a much less conspiratorial, way to explain Hitlery’s rather ‘surprising’ loss?  For instance, Barry’s failed domestic and foreign policies; Hitlery’s total lack of likability, achievement, and any measurable political skill; a corrupt media openly rooting for one side; political correctness run amok and trying to enforce a toxic progressive ideology; and the arrogant hypocrisy of progressives whose hearts bleed for the “oppressed” even as they contemptuously ignore the impact of their policies on the lives and beliefs of the struggling working class whose votes are what put Trump over the finish line.

Meanwhile, the real scandal here is the politicization of intelligence by those who had access to it, and then leaked it to their friends in the state-controlled media for the soul purpose of damaging Trump’s presidential campaign and cripple his fledgling administration.  Is that now where we have gotten in this country, and is this the true legacy of Barack Hussein Obama?  Have we been reduced to a country where a highly placed intelligence official can leak those names of citizens to political opponents, citizens who had been surveilled “incidentally” and then had their identities “unmasked.”  We’ve now had a former Barry administration official, and Hitlery campaign advisor, admit on MSNBC that she counseled her former colleagues to gather and distribute classified information on Trump during the transition.

Every American, regardless of political affiliation, should want to get to the bottom of this serial contempt for the law and violation of citizen rights. We need to find out those responsible, and if they are found guilty, subject them to the penalties prescribed by law in order to send a very clear message that such violations of public trust and fealty to the Constitution will not be tolerated.  That’s what House Representative Devin Nunes is trying to do, only to be demonized by the Democrats and ‘NeverTrump’ Republicans who are demanding his resignation as chair of the committee.  Why?  Because Nunes briefed Trump before the minority members of his committee.  Democrats who spent eight years enabling Barry’s hijacking of the powers of Congress are suddenly passionate about its superficial prerogatives?

And what have the Democrats done to deserve such consideration?  After all, they have declared a war of “resistance” against President Trump, pandered night and day to their radical base, obstructed and undermined the president at every turn, and crudely and childishly insulted and mocked him.  Progressive judges have blocked his completely Constitutional executive orders on immigration out of spite, and Democrat-friendly intelligence officials are likely behind the leaks of his phone conversations as well as the classified information that led to Gen. Mike Flynn’s resignation. Yet Republicans are supposed to trust them and abide by the professional “protocols” and “courtesies” that Democrats serially violate.  Isn’t this the same double standard that turned so many voters against the party establishment?

Finally, I get why the Democrats are squealing, I do.  It’s their standard tactic of projecting their sins onto others, and forcing Republicans to play by a different set of rules than they themselves follow.  And given the felonious carelessness of their standard-bearer Hitlery, who while Secretary of State grossly violated her responsibility to protect classified information and ran a pay-for-play Foundation, their moralizing bluster about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia is not only shameless, but surreal.  As for us ordinary citizens, we need to stop listening to the hysteria and misdirection, and start demanding that the leakers be investigated, identified, and if found guilty, punished. Let’s restore accountability and affirm one of the most fundamental principles of our constitutional government, that NO ONE is above the law.

FILE THIS ONE UNDER: WE CAN’T UNDERSTAND WHY BERNIE LOST…

Bernie Sanders

Now just in case there is anyone still wondering how it is that Bernie Sanders, that self-professed Socialist from Vermont, came to lose to Hitlery in the Democrat primary it was in a recent interview on the Communist News Network (CNN) that he shed a little light onto why that likely came about.  You see, it was during a recent interview with faux journalist and that purveyor of fake news, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, that old Bernie took the opportunity to rail against President Trump.  And in so doing Bernie said that Trump’s decision, via his recent executive order, to prioritize jobs over climate change is “a nonsensical and stupid and dangerous approach.”  What?

Blitzer reminded Sanders that Trump’s order is intended to “curb the federal government’s enforcement of climate regulations by putting American jobs above addressing climate change.”  To which Bernie responded by saying, “Wolf, that is such a nonsensical, and stupid, and dangerous approach. It’s almost indescribable.”  Bernie went on to claim, “Look, the scientific community is virtually unanimous. While Trump and his friends think climate change is a hoax, what the scientists are telling us it is real, it is caused by human activity..It is already causing devastating problems.”  Sorry Bernie, but I hate to be the one to tell you that you’re wrong again, and all points.

This goes was beyond Bernie merely being wrong, the truth is he thinks you’re stupid.  And frankly I’m getting sick and tired of hearing about this silly nonsense called ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’, THERE IS NO SUCH THING. The climate is not going to matter a hill of beans if the country is in a great depression and everyone is dying of starvation. Yes, we should work to take care of the environment, but jobs should come first, and in addition if you push this nonsense then make other countries like China, India, and a few others step up to the plate with the same restrictions, which they don’t do, why because they want their economies to be thriving.

So face it Bernie, we the reasonably intelligent people still left are going to fight you and your rabidly left wing colleagues every single step of the way.  What’s so important about jobs?  Really?  We’re supposed to believe what really matters is climate change, allowing into our country thousands of refugees who we have no idea who they are, transgender rights, open borders and high taxes?  And we should all come to realize that a government made up of people like you knows what’s best for us?  And will take care of us for free, no less?  He’s really retarded, folks.  Which is just another way of saying he’s a Socialist. And if you’re not careful it can happen to you.

A Public Safety Announcement: We apologize that someone let this patient out of his psycho ward and few years too early.  It should be known that he carries a not so rare psychological mind virus called Socialism that can, in some instances, be considered contagious, depending on one’s IQ.  The lower one’s IQ the more susceptible you become.  Symptoms include the draining of your free will and a further reducing of one’s IQ until one becomes essentially little more than a babbling idiot. Americans can inoculate themselves against this contagion by avoiding any and all contact with the state-run media complex, ignore the blatant propaganda and to start thinking for themselves.