So riddle me this, why is it that anyone with the slightest amount of commonsense would want to waste any amount of time listening to some wacky leftwing TV cook regarding their opinion on American politics?  Especially one that is little more than just another brain-dead liberal.  It’s right up there with choosing to listen to the many ‘half-baked’ Hollyweird loons who spew their idiotic drivel.  But it was in an interview with Reason magazine that Anthony Bourdain, and rather surprisingly so, confessed that he is “nauseated” by the contempt with which “privileged Eastern liberals such as myself” hold their fellow red state Americans.

Apparently, Mr. Bourdain, well-known celebrity cook and self-described “privileged Eastern liberal”, slammed his fellow leftist elites this week, arguing that their disdain for working-class Americans is what helped to create “the upswell of rage and contempt” that in turn helped to propel Donald Trump to the presidency.  Bourdain was quoted as saying, “The utter contempt with which privileged Eastern liberals such as myself discuss red-state, gun-country, working-class America as ridiculous and morons and rubes is largely responsible for the upswell of rage and contempt and desire to pull down the temple that we’re seeing now.”

He said, “I’ve spent a lot of time in gun-country, God-fearing America. There are a hell of a lot of nice people out there, who are doing what everyone else in this world is trying to do: the best they can to get by, and take care of themselves and the people they love. When we deny them their basic humanity and legitimacy of their views, however different they may be than ours, when we mock them at every turn, and treat them with contempt, we do no one any good. Nothing nauseates me more than preaching to the converted.”  As far as I’m concerned Bourdain is just one more leftwing hypocrite on what has come to be a very long list of many.

Bourdain, who is a New York City native and an outspoken critic of the president-elect, said he thinks “the rise of authoritarianism” is a “global trend and one that should be of concern to everyone.” Still, he argued, the belittling or dismissive attitudes of his peers toward Trump’s supporters is counterproductive.  He said, “The self-congratulatory tone of the privileged left — just repeating and repeating and repeating the outrages of the opposition — this does not win hearts and minds.”  And then he went on to say, “It doesn’t change anyone’s opinions. It only solidifies them and makes things worse for all of us.”  Pretty profound for a cook.

Apparently he was also asked his opinion of HBO host Bill Maher.  Bourdain appeared on Maher’s show Real Time a few years back and, as we can see, it didn’t leave a very favorable impression.  And it was regarding Mr. Maher that Bourdain said, “[Maher is] insufferably smug. Really the worst of the smug, self-congratulatory left. I have a low opinion of him. I did not have an enjoyable experience on his show. Not a show I plan to do again. He’s a classic example of the smirking, contemptuous, privileged guy who lives in a bubble. And he is in no way looking to reach outside, or even look outside, of that bubble, in an empathetic way.”

With all that said I think it might be worth noting Bourdain really ain’t that much of a fan of those who live in flyover country either.  As proof of that I offer other comments of note from the TV cook which include the time that he said the world would only be at peace when Whites are bred out of existence.  Or when he attributed the supposed harmony of Singaporean society to miscegenation.  In reality, Singapore owes its orderliness to harsh laws that are very strictly enforced. The population there is 70 percent ethnic Chinese, and they give no sign of wanting to mix with the native Malay Muslims, imported Africans, or anyone else.

This guy Bourdain is another one of those left wing creeps who were they to be living in any country other than the good old U. S. of A., would be selling pencils on some street corner.  Like most of his leftwing compatriots who call Hollyweird home, he has more money than sense.  Personally, I think Mr. Bourdain is just another frustrated Hitlery supporter who has yet to come to grips with the fact that his favored candidate lost.  He too seems to suffer from that which has come to infect so many on the left known as Trump derangement syndrome.  I see his recent interview with Reason magazine as being little more than some weird form of therapy.



To my way of thinking, there’s ignorant, there’s really ignorant, and then there’s John Kerry-Heinz ignorant.  Here’s a bonehead who will most certainly be joining the ranks of those recognized as being the most inept, incompetent, and most unqualified secretaries of state that this country has ever had the misfortune to have.  A notable cast of characters which includes such recent players as Cyrus Vance, Warren Christopher, Madeleine Albright, and of course Hitlery Clinton.  A modern day version of foreign policy ‘Keystone Kops.’

In looking back over the decades it doesn’t take one very long to recognize the fact that those secretaries of state associated with Democrat administrations have, more often than not, been absolutely abysmal in how they went about performing their jobs.  For some bizarre reason the ability to properly address foreign policy issues is so far beyond the skillset possessed by most liberals as to make them completely incapable of being able to handle the simplest requirements of the job.  To the point of being embarrassing for the rest of us.

And now comes word that John Kerry-Heinz ‘allegedly’ gave a Palestinian delegation his word that the U.S. would not impose a veto prior to the passing of a UN resolution against Israeli settlements.  This according to a “leaked transcript” of the meeting.  Kerry-Heinz, along with that other proven liar, White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice, reportedly told the Palestinians on December 12 that they wouldn’t veto the resolution as long as its wording was ‘balanced’.  That information comes by way of the Egyptian news site Al-Youm Al-Sabaa reports.

It’s this report that cites a “leaked transcript” from the meetings composed by the Palestinian delegation. The U.S. Department of State denies the existence of such a document.  And it’s no surprise that Chief Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat described the transcripts as “fabrications” when he commented on the alleged leak Wednesday.  The document further claims that Kerry-Heinz and Rice advised the Palestinians not to make any provocative moves in the UN after President-elect Donald Trump takes office, calling him “dangerous.”

If authentic, the document justifies Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticism against Barry “Almighty” since the resolution passed last Friday.  It was Sunday that Prime Minister Netanyahu said, “From the information that we have, we have no doubt that the Obama administration initiated it, stood behind it, coordinated on the wording and demanded that it be passed.”  And Ron Dermer, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., said there’s “clear evidence” the Obama administration was behind the resolution that will be presented to Trump.

And in getting back to John Kerry-Heinz, the definition of traitor is a person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.  And it’s based on that that one could very easily argue that Barry and Kerry-Heinz both betrayed our friend Israel, thus making them both traitors by definition.  One could also argue that they betrayed a long standing US foreign policy principle of not allowing the UN Security Council to pass anti-Israel resolutions. It’s that foreign policy principle that has been practiced by every US administration since Truman.

Of course, one could also argue that Barry and Kerry-Heinz have betrayed their own country by their many actions over the years, and more times than one can count.  Kerry-Heinz, as you know, has a rather long history of blatantly traitorous behavior.  So in that regard this recent backstabbing of Israel should come as no surprise.  It was shocking, historic, and baffling all at once.  After eight years of lame and ineffective action, we suddenly have what is by far the worst resolution and speech regarding Israel ever to come out of Barry’s administration?  And he may not be done yet!

When has an outgoing president ever unleashed such actions with less than a month before his successor takes office?  It’s baffling in the sense that there’s no way any of this can stick. The more outrageous Barry’s actions are at the end, the more likely they’ll be undone by Trump at the very beginning.  By giving the Palestinians and their enablers false hope that Israel has been diplomatically isolated, they’ll all go berserk when Trump comes in and wipes it all away.  Barry seems to be telling Trump “you can’t move the embassy like you want to, because it will result in war.”

Barry is petty, vindictive, narcissistic, and nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. He’s just continuing to blow up the Middle East and the Democrat Party as well. We the People will be fully behind Trump’s attempt to erase Barry’s legacy.  His arrogance knows no bounds. Barry the narcissist still believes himself to be the savior of the world and is trying to do anything he can to stop the “evil” Trump and his dastardly pro American supporters. How dare we not to have voted the way he instructed us to, he thinks to himself.



I must admit that I was rather late in getting onboard the ‘Trump Train’.  Frankly, I was one of those who were quite confident that he would come to flame out long before the final decision would be made regarding who would ultimately become our Republican presidential nominee.  But as members of his competition slowly began to fall by the wayside I was essentially forced to mover ever closer to becoming a Trump supporter.  And when he came to be the last man standing I was left with little choice but to support him.  While I was never a “Never Trumper”, I was a “Trump Doubter.”  But once it was clear that Mr. Trump was gonna be our guy, even though I still had my doubts, I, somewhat reluctantly, jumped aboard the ‘Trump Train.’

But over time I’ve come to believe that Donald Trump has the potential to become a truly great president.  But in order for that to happen, two things must occur:  He must follow through on key campaign commitments, and the Republican Congress must ‘act’ on them.  After 8 long years that have resulted in nothing more than the doubling of our national debt, the decimating of our healthcare system, more Americans than ever before now living in poverty and on some form of government assistance and the fewest number of Americans in the nation’s workforce since the days of Jimmy Carter, the American people, by electing Donald Trump, showed, very clearly, that they wanted something different.  Something better.

So here are nine commitments Trump made during the campaign, that the incoming Congress should, and very much need to, assist in making a reality:

  1. Completely repeal Obamacare. Trump’s position paper on health care said: “Our elected representatives in the House and Senate must: Completely repeal Obamacare. Our elected representatives must eliminate the individual mandate. No person should be required to buy insurance unless he or she wants to.” It further stated that reforms put in place after the repeal should “follow free market principles that will restore economic freedom and certainty to everyone in this country.” Congress must immediately repeal Obamacare — and enact only reforms that “follow free market principles.”
  2. Confirm pro-life constitutionalists to the Supreme Court. “The freedoms we cherish and the constitutional values and principles our country was founded on are in jeopardy,” Trump stated in September. “The responsibility is greater than ever to protect and uphold these freedoms and I will appoint justices, who, like Justice Scalia, will protect our liberty with the highest regard for the Constitution.” In a letter to pro-life leaders, Trump added: “I am committed to … (n)ominating pro-life justices to the U.S. Supreme Court.”  The Senate should confirm only nominees who fit the model Trump advocated.
  3. Build the wall and enforce the immigration laws. In his immigration plan, Trump promised to: “Begin working on an impenetrable physical wall on the southern border, on Day One.” “All immigration laws will be enforced — we will triple the number of ICE agents,” said the plan. “Anyone who enters the U.S. illegally is subject to deportation.”  Trump’s plan also would “turn off the jobs and benefits magnet” for illegal immigrants. “Many immigrants come to the U.S. illegally in search of jobs,” it said, “even though federal law prohibits the employment of illegal immigrants.”   Congress should enact all legislation needed to build Trump’s wall and fully enforce the immigration laws.

And any city that insists upon identifying itself as being a ‘sanctuary’ for those in this country illegally, must be made to forfeit ALL federal funding they currently receive.

  1. Pass the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. “I am committed to … (s)igning into law the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would end painful late-term abortions nationwide,” Trump said in his letter to pro-life leaders. Congress should place that bill on Trump’s desk by Jan. 27, the day of the 2017 March for Life.
  2. Defund Planned Parenthood. “I am committed to … (d)efunding Planned Parenthood as long as they continue to perform abortions,” Trump said in his letter. Congress should defund Planned Parenthood in the first spending bill it sends Trump.
  3. Cut income tax rates and end the “death tax.” “The Trump Plan will collapse the current seven tax brackets to three brackets,” says Trump’s tax plan. It would cut the top rate from 39.6 percent to 33 percent. Additionally, Trump’s plan would “repeal the death tax,” which can be a confiscatory tax on family owned businesses. It also drops the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent.  A great Congress would go further than Trump’s plan. It would enact the “Fair Tax Act” that would eliminate the income tax, replace it with a sales tax and set the stage for repeal of the 16th Amendment, which made direct federal taxation of individual incomes plausible.  But enacting Trump’s plan to cut tax rates and abolish the death tax is a good start to reining in federal tax collections.
  4. Make better trade deals. In 2015, the U.S. had a merchandise trade deficit of $745.66 billion, according to the Census Bureau. Since 1979, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the nation has lost more than 7 million manufacturing jobs. Trump’s trade plan calls for negotiating “fair trade deals that create American jobs, increase American wages, and reduce America’s trade deficit.” That includes withdrawing from the not-yet-approved Trans-Pacific Partnership and renegotiating NAFTA.  The Senate should ratify better trade deals when they are negotiated.
  5. End our nation-building foreign policy. Trump’s foreign policy plan says he will end “the current strategy of nation-building and regime change.” Congress should support this, including by reasserting its constitutional authority over the use of military force. That means the president may not use force — except to repel a sudden attack on the United States — unless Congress authorizes it.
  6. Enact a balanced budget. Sean Hannity asked Trump on Fox News on June 17, 2015: “Would you insist on a balanced budget as president?” Trump responded: “I would insist on it relatively soon.” When President Barack Obama took office, the federal debt was about 10.6 Trillion. Now it is about $19.9 Trillion.  Barry “Almighty” and the last Republican Congress kept America on the road to bankruptcy. President Trump and the new Republican Congress must lead us back the other way — and they cannot do it too soon.

And finally there’s one other issue that our new President and our congressional leaders must come together on, and on the very first day of the new administration.  And that would the total and complete defunding of the United Nations when it comes to any and all money furnished to this very corrupt organization that has as its source the American taxpayer.  As far as the other items listed above are concerned, Trump, and our congressional Republicans, will have only a very brief window of opportunity to prove that they are up to the challenge of governing.  And all eyes will be on them, we will be waiting and watching.  They will have less than two years to make progress in getting this country back on the right track.  Time is of the essence.



Ever the confident malcontent, Barry “Almighty” recently asserted, and very boldly so, that he could have easily won a third term against Donald Trump if he had been permitted to run again, and by using his original mantra of “Hope and Change.”  It was during a ‘Clinton News Network’ (CNN) podcast interview with David “My Mommy is a Commie” Axelrod that Barry declared, “I am confident in this vision because I’m confident that if I had run again and articulated it, I think I could’ve mobilized a majority of the American people to rally behind it.”  Thankfully, we’ll never know for sure if that would have been the case.

And he went on to say, “I know that in conversations that I’ve had with people around the country, even some people who disagreed with me, they would say, ‘The vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one.'”  If that’s true, why is it that recent polling data tells us that it’s an overwhelming percentage of the American people who are of the opinion that their country is headed in the wrong direction?  Hence we have a President-Elect Trump.  Barry also stressed he would be working hard to develop young Democrat leaders once he left office, and didn’t discount the possibility of his speaking out on issues should he be so inclined.

He said, “At a certain point, you make room for new voices and fresh legs.”  And he added, “That doesn’t mean that if a year-and-a-half from now, or two years from now, there is an issue of such moment, such import, that isn’t just a debate about a particular tax bill or a particular policy, but goes to some foundational issues about our democracy that I might now weigh in.”  He said, “You know, I’m still a citizen and that carries with it duties and obligations.” Barry also accused the media for holding Hitlery to a double standard.  Though he did suggest that she made a mistake in focusing more on Trump than on her own economic message.

Barry said, “Understandably, I think she looked and said well, given my opponent and the things he’s saying and what he’s doing, we should focus on that.”  And of course Barry also saw fit to assign some level of blame when he called “filters” like Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and the NRA for disrupting his message of “Hope and Change”.  But what we see 7 years later is that his message was more like “hoax and chains.”  Barry said, “[I]f we’re not actually out there like we are during campaigns, then folks in a lot of these communities, what they’re hearing is Obama wants to take away my guns or Obamacare’s about transgender bathrooms and not my job.”

Barry concluded that he neglected to properly understand the significance of the conservative media.  Actually he was likely confident that the liberal media would be more successful in making the conservative media, irrelevant.  But Barry did go on to ask, “Part of what I’ve struggled with during my presidency and part of what I think I’ll be thinking a lot about after my presidency is how do we work around all these filters?”  Barry said, “And it becomes more complicated now that you’ve got social media, where people are getting news that reinforces their biases and — and separates people out instead of bringing them together.”

But while Barry professes to be so concerned about what he refers to as being filters, he seems only to be concerned only with those on the right.  And something Barry chose not to mention was how Hitlery once declared that she would essentially serve as the third-term president of Barry’s legacy.  And let’s not forget that both Barry and Moochelle campaigned pretty heavily for the perennial Democrat, and yet Trump still won the White House.  Barry still asserts that he would have won had he run for re-election, even though President-elect Donald Trump won on several key issues that directly reject Barry’s goal for America.

In choosing to elect Barry, I sincerely believe Americans voted in an impostor; not once but twice. This man’s agenda was to destroy America. He has never once recognized this great country or her people on the basis of their true accomplishments.  Hitlery’s agenda was the same as his and she had the plus of being a woman.  Yet she lost.  Intent on proving that he learned nothing in his eight years of taxpayer funded self-absorption, he reprises a version of the 2008 “bitter clinger” meme to explain the complete rejection of his “leadership” in 2016.  That darn NRA, Limbaugh and Fox! THEY are the reason my brilliance was obscured to the gullible!



Much has been said about what the legacy of Barry “Almighty” will be.  What’s often been mentioned is the deterioration of the Democrat Party across all levels of government that has taken place on his watch.  Whether we’re talking about the number of governorships, state legislatures, U.S. House and Senate seats, or now the White House, the substantial losses suffered by the Democrat Party that has taken place over the last eight years can be laid directly at the doorstep of Barry “Almighty.”  But to hear Barry tell it, he’s played no role in any of it, he has even gone so far as to describe himself as being a victim.  A victim, really?

Because instead of accepting any level of responsibility for what has transpired, Barry chooses to blame conservative media, especially Fox News and talk radio host Rush Limbaugh for his ‘loss of stature’, in the eyes of the public over his eight years in office.  In a series of interviews with The Atlantic ahead of a long-form feature published in the January/February magazine issue titled, “My President is Black,” Barry discussed race, the media, and what it took to win the presidency.  Barry, in the first interview, talked a lot about how Americans viewed him from 2008 compared to now, and how he thinks Fox News and Limbaugh played a role in that.

Barry said, “In 2008, I was never subjected to the kind of concentrated vilification of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, the whole conservative-media ecosystem, and so as a consequence, even for my first two years as a senator, I was polling at 70 percent. And it was because people basically saw me unfiltered.”  He added, “I was at a town-hall meeting, or I was talking to people directly, or they had met me, or I would speak at a university or go to a VFW hall. But they weren’t seeing some image of me as trying to take away their stuff and give it to black people, and coddle criminals, and all the stereotypes of not just African-American politicians but liberal politicians.”

Barry went on to say, “You started to see that kind of prism being established towards the end of the 2008 race, particularly once Sarah Palin was the nominee. And obviously almost immediately after I was elected, it was deployed in full force. And it had an impact in terms of how a large portion of white voters would see me.”  Yup, when it comes to Barry “Almighty” nothing is ever his fault, it’s all because white America is nothing more than a bunch of racists eager to see the nation’s first black president fail.  Speaking for myself, I had some pretty high hopes for Barry.  But it was in fairly short order that I came to realize I was seriously mistaken.

At its core, the revolution of 2016, if you wish to call it that, was little more than an attempt at restoration, at fixing a ‘broken’ system.  But who, or what, broke it?  Both parties acquiesced in bank liberalization, open-borders immigration, and Wall Street bailouts.  But the most acute challenge was Barry’s direct assault on the constitutional framework itself. Barry came into office seeking to “fundamentally transform” America, and believed that the ends would justify the means.  And since Republicans, paralyzed by the fear of being called racist and essentially cowed by those in the media, put up little fight, the voters took matters into their own hands.

Here are ten of the most serious ways that Barry “Almighty” essentially broke the system.

  1. The stimulus. On the campaign trail, Barry promised a $50 Billion stimulus and criticized George W. Bush for building up the national debt. In office, Barry passed a nearly $1 Trillion stimulus, over Republican objections, that failed to keep unemployment from below 8% (as promised), and went largely to pet projects and state and local governments. This reckless and obviously wasteful spending shocked voters who feared that the country was now on an irreversible path to fiscal ruin. The Tea Party was born.
  2. Fast and Furious. Barry’s team smuggled guns across the Mexican border, ostensibly to trace them to drug cartels. Unlike the Bush administration’s Wide Receiver, Barry’s Operation Fast and Furious happened without the Mexican government’s knowledge. The likely goal was to create a pretext for reducing gun ownership in the U.S. It led to the murders of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and hundreds of Mexicans. Afterwards, Barry used “executive privilege” to cover it up.
  3. Betraying allies. Barry picked public fights with Israel in a deliberate effort to establish “distance” between the allies. He also broke agreements with the Czechs and the Poles on missile defense, infamously informing the Polish prime minister on the 70th anniversary of the Katyn Massacre. He snubbed the British in ways small (returning a Churchill bust) and big (using the Argentinian term “Malvinas” for the Falklands). And he spied on foreign allies, including Germany’s Angela Merkel.
  4. Obamacare. The sweeping plan for “universal” health insurance sought, fundamentally, to make individuals dependent on the state, the better to open the door to even more sweeping changes. But it was the process of passing the bill that caused the real damage. To pass Obamacare, Barry allies in Congress bent and/or broke every procedural rule imaginable. They lied, repeatedly, about the policy; disguised a tax as a fee; and bullied the Supreme Court into compliance. It was the first major entitlement passed without bipartisan support.
  5. Debt ceiling. Few of the Republicans who rode the Tea Party wave in 2010 made an issue out of the debt ceiling. But Barry believed that a confrontation would help it regain full control of Congress. So it picked a fight over the debt, and forced a confrontation in the summer of 2011 that brought the country to the brink of default. Barry scuttled a “grand bargain” with Republicans by demanding higher taxes. The result: a hated budget “sequester” and a credit downgrade.
  6. Benghazi. Presidents had lied to the country before about national security incidents: the Iran-Contra scandal, for example, left a stain on Ronald Reagan’s legacy. But no previous American president had abandoned Americans to die abroad without putting up a fight or making a serious effort to punish the perpetrators. In fact, in the heat of battle, Barry turned in early and flew to a political fundraiser in Las Vegas the next day. It was an unprecedented abdication of his commander-in-chief role.
  7. IRS scandal. Encouraged by Barry’s attacks on “dark money” and conservative political donors, the Internal Revenue Service began singling out conservative non-profit organizations for excessive scrutiny, denying them the ability to operate during the crucial 2012 elections, and trying to pry loose private information on their donors, their meetings, and even the content of their prayers. To this day, no one on Barry’s team has been punished for that horrific abuse of power.
  8. AP scandal. Despite the media’s ongoing love affair with Barry, the administration targeted journalists for harassment, surveillance and prosecution. In one case, the Department of Justice seized phone records from the Associated Press; in another, the DOJ searched the emails of Fox News reporter James Rosen and his family. Congress later found Attorney General Eric Holder misled it when he told them in May 2013 he had not been involved in potential prosecution of the media.
  9. Iran deal. After resisting sanctions on Iran, and holding off on any real action against the Iranian regime when it faced mass protests in 2009, Barry made a deal with Iran in 2015 that removed most sanctions in exchange for a mere temporary slowdown in the Iranian nuclear program. Worse, he refused to submit it to the Senate for ratification in accordance with the Constitution’s Treaty Clause, and Democrats blocked a weaker effort to submit the deal to an overall congressional vote.
  10. Executive action on immigration. Barry abused prosecutorial discretion in 2012 in announcing “Deferred Action for Children of Americans” (DACA) in 2012, even after Congress declined to pass legislation on “Dreamers.” But the real offense came after the 2014 elections, when Barry defied the electorate and announced an “executive amnesty” — “Deferred Action for Parents of Americans” (DAPA) — that he himself said dozens of times was unconstitutional (he lost in the courts).

Likely only three surviving items will be left over from Barry: the national debt, gay marriage, and increased racial tensions. Trump has promised to reverse Barry’s immigration madness. Trump will also be left to clean up Barry’s Middle East mess. Trump has also promised to repeal ObamaCare and to reverse Barry’s onerous regulations.  So accuse me of being racist if it makes you feel better, but whatever hope I may have had that Barry would fail, had nothing to do with the fact that was black. It had everything to do with the fact he’s a socialist.  Barry professes to be an expert on our ‘Constitution’, his behavior as president says something quite different.

Over course of the last eight years I think it has become very clear that our current president hates white folks. He’s done nothing to help America.  Everything he’s done as president was done with one thing in mind, to systematically destroy America.  He keeps saying people were against him because he’s a black man. That is not true at all.  People were against him because of his leftist policies. Although I didn’t vote for him, I, along with millions of others, thought he was just the man who would be able to address the problems of the black communities.  Whites saw that 50 years of the War of Poverty was nothing more than a miserable, and very costly, failure.

After all, who better than a black President to undo the many harms that the left has done to those people living in the inner cities?  But any hope that he would actually attempt such an undertaking, were quickly dashed.  So whether Barry chooses to admit it or not, people, and not just whites, didn’t turn against him because he’s black, they turned against him when he failed to address the problems, and worse, he exacerbated them by siding with the more radical elements of our society because doing so benefited his political party.  He put his political ideology above all else, and now has the nerve to whine about the only ones brave enough to point that out.

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, Washington Post, Huffington Post, Salon, Politico, and every other faction of the left wing state-controlled media complex, along with thousands of left wing newscasters and commentators PLUS the elite of Hollywood had daily parties celebrating their disdain for George W. Bush for the entire eight years he was in office.  Yet Barry “Almighty” is somehow views himself as being able make the claim that he was overly picked on by Fox News and one single individual?  How pathetic.  How juvenile.  Barry has but one person to blame for what he calls his “loss of stature.”  And that would, of course, be, himself!



One of the biggest disappointments of this entire election season, although something not totally unexpected, was how we were made to witness that which can only be described as the complete unraveling and final demise of what was once referred to as being our mainstream media.  As the days pass and the smoke continues to clear a bit after the shocking events of November 8th, it’s difficult to come to grips with the magnitude of their collapse. While it’s true that their demise has been many years in the making, it doesn’t make what we just witnessed any less stunning.

Some in the ‘press’, those who have managed to get beyond their grief, have shown a bit of introspection, after they came to the realization that their political campaign was over and they had lost.  But sadly, the soul-searching itself is just part of the script.  The “we live in a liberal bubble” explanation worked for a while, but it is wholly inadequate to explain 2016.  And while I hesitate to say it, because they still do wield a certain amount of power, it is for all intents and purposes, that which we once called the mainstream media can now be declared, and officially so, quite dead.

And I guess ‘if’ there is anything that can be described as being sad about what it that has occurred here, as it relates to media, it’s that they were essentially killed by their own hand.  In other words, they are dead because they can no longer be trusted when it comes to anything they say.  In 2016, we discovered, and beyond the shadow of any doubt, that those in the mainstream media will not hesitate in the least when it comes to colluding with the Democrat Party in an effort to advance the careers of liberal politicians.  And we now know that they colluded to elect Hitlery.

And this goes far beyond merely siding with liberal policies or demanding in your official ‘media manual’ that pro-lifers be called “anti-abortion.”  That’s plain old liberal bias, and we’re all accustomed to dealing with it.  However, this goes well beyond that.  The “liberal bubble” was Bernard Goldberg’s thesis in his best-selling book Bias, and it made a lot of sense then.  But it turns out, that explanation falls way short.  But while the bubble is real, and it helps explain many aspects of what ails newsrooms all over the country, it nowhere near tells the whole story.

The mainstream media, aka the state-controlled media, provided both cover for and ammunition to the Democrat Party, while hiding behind the misappropriated title of “journalists.”  And they were very open about it, acting as if they no longer cared whether we recognized their biases or not.  But you can’t call yourself “the press” when you give the questions for a presidential debate to one of the candidates.  And you can’t pretend impartiality when you are coordinating with the Democrat National Committee on the questions you need to ask of their opponents.

Today’s press ignores or holds on to information and chooses to release it when it feels that the time is right for maximum political impact.  And the after-election freakout continues in much the same way.  The Clinton News Network’s (CNN) coverage of the anti-Trump protests included a protestor using the “Hillary got more votes” talking point of the left that got a lot of play on social media.  And while the claim is true, there’s never any mention that all of those votes came from California.  Remove that state from the equation and the vote totals are very different.

We need to accept the fact that those in the media are not going to change.  You can forget about that.  Because nothing has really changed.  The same Democrat operatives who worked the newsrooms before the election, continue their work today.  They’ll just have to try harder next time, be subtler or simply work harder at not getting caught.  After all they did almost win.  We just have to adapt to this new “pressless” world.  Sure, there are some good reporters who try to do a good job, but it’s so hard to decipher it all. It’s fair to say most people will not go to the trouble.

Let’s face it, the media is dead.  And it’ll take a miracle to resurrect it.  And it was in a year known mostly for mayhem, misfortune, and madness, that America’s media quickly proved themselves to be unfit for narrating this first draft of history. All too often, when the news got tough, the news got weird.  And while picking 10 of the most egregious examples was no easy task, we’ve whittled thousands of examples down to the ten examples that we think represent 2016 in a nutshell. So without further ado, here are the media’s 10 most mortifying moments of 2016:

  1. After Donald Trump’s underdog victory, many in the media looked for scapegoats. But Comedy Central’s Samantha Bee went the furthest — blaming white people for “ruining” America.
  2. Hitlery notoriously avoided direct questions from the press all year. So when Lester Holt became one of the few to somehow score a sit down with her, his softballs-only interview was journalistically humiliating.
  3. Cuba’s longtime dictator expired this year, and many in America’s media actually mourned.
  4. And perhaps while not historically significant, a particularly comical case of media malpractice came when an enchanted Andrea Mitchell breathlessly recapped the “magical” evening she was having at a Hitlery rally.
  5. Over on taxpayer funded PBS, David Brooks and David Corn somehow connected the dots between Ted Cruz and Satan. Go figure!
  6. After the devastating mass slaughter in Orlando, the media embraced its unfortunate habit of speculating where things went wrong — looking everywhere, it seemed, besides Islamic terrorism.
  7. After another tragedy — this time an alligator snatching a toddler from a Disney World beachfront — CNN’s Brooke Baldwin thankfully had the presence of mind to ask a local animal expert … what the alligator was thinking.
  8. On MSNBC, the now-canceled Melissa Harris Perry worried that Flint, Mich., might become Barry “Almighty’s”… Fugitive Slave Act?
  9. After Orlando, many progressive congressmen staged a sit-in on the floor of the House of Representatives. The media, you be unsurprised to discover, went absolutely bananas with delight.
  10. If there was one thing the media was absolutely sure of in 2016, it was … Hitlery’s inevitable landslide victory. Whoops.

I think we can all agree that the ‘media’ is composed of little more than Snowflakes who believe themselves to be ‘journalists’.  They are entitled people motivated by a sense of superiority and condescension.  They were brainwashed in their colleges to think ‘progressively”, meaning, they believe whatever the professors say.  They see themselves as being born to inform and guide the masses.  And while they honestly hate ‘hate’, they are, at the same time, free to hate, because hate is deserved.  The best you can do with this people is to ignore them, or simply make fun of them.

The corrupt ‘Left’ as well as well as those in the state-controlled media remain in full denial when it comes to this election. They still can’t believe Americans didn’t want a crooked, criminal leftwing nut of a “woman” to be their President. And so it goes. The real story about this election is that people feared that Hitlery would continue with the highly destructive socialist policies of Barry.  That’s why the Democrats lost. You can say anything you like about Trump, but he is far superior to this corrupt, old school politician. It’s always good for the country when crooked loses.

So the mainstreamers will now have a choice to make, either do the job a journalist is supposed, and expected, to do, that being, tell the truth and let others decide on their own or continue to toe the Democrat Party line or, continue to lie, cheat, and obscure the real truth.  The media has a responsibility to the people and to the Republic and if they continue to ignore that responsibility, they willingly forfeit any credibility they desire in return.  And if what we have seen taking place since the election, it would appear that the choice has already been made.

Eventually they will go out of business. I never watch CNN and rarely even watch Fox. Eventually people will simply stop watching and whoever is funding them will tire of burning up money. What I worry more about, and this includes newspapers as well, is who is doing the real, and still very much needed, investigative reporting?  Wikileaks helped expose Hitlery, the media bias, Clinton money laundering, etc.  But hacking private emails is not hardnosed journalism. We badly need real investigating and reporting to keep politicians honest. We have lost that and we need it back, soon.



She who has been the most classless ‘First Lady’ to ever set foot in the White House, Moochelle Obummer, recently told fellow racist Oprah that she is very much looking forward to getting her “anonymity” back.  Now if you believe that, well then I have some prime oceanfront property in Arizona that I can let you have real cheap.  Let’s face it, after being forced to watch these people for the last eight years, who can deny the fact that she loves being on the spotlight more than her narcissist husband.

Moochelle complained in an interview that aired Monday night with Oprah Winfrey on the ‘Communist Broadcasting System’, aka CBS, that her biggest sacrifice while Barry has served as president was giving up her ability to be anonymous.  But soon, she believes, that will change.  Yes, she seems to yearn for a return to the good old days.  So would that be the good old days when she complained of being treated like the help?  Or when Barry apparently had trouble catching a cab because he’s a black man?

Or like the trip she once took to Target, as first lady, when we’re supposed to believe that the only person who came up to her in the store was a woman who asked her to help her take something off a shelf.  Because, apparently, she didn’t see Moochelle as the first lady, but as someone who could help her.  So I’m guessing we’re to believe the only reason she was asked to help was because she is black, not because she is tall?  Moochelle is, by the way, 5’11”.  Talk about being paranoid.

Moochelle went on to say, “You know, there’s nowhere I can go in the world and just sit at a table and have a cup of coffee and watch the world.”  Even Oprah seemed to throw the bullshit flag regarding Moochelle’s desire to get her anonymity back — but Moochelle was insistent.  She said, “Yes, I am. Now it’s all gonna change.”  Somehow I just don’t think so.  Moochelle has become addicted.  Addicted to the attention and convinced that people might actually give a shit about what she thinks.

Moochelle also said that she wouldn’t be running for office.  Well thank God for that, though I’m not sure I believe her.  She went on to tell Oprah, “That’s one thing I don’t do. I don’t make stuff up. I’m not coy. I’ve proven that. I’m pretty direct.”  And she went on to say, “If I were interested in it, I’d say it. I don’t believe in playing games. It’s not something I would do.”  Moochelle also said that the recent election “was challenging for me as a citizen to watch and experience. It was painful.”

No, Moochelle never makes anything up and, like her husband, she always tells the truth.  Anybody believe that?  But I would agree with Moochelle on one thing. This recent election was rather painful to watch.  It was painful to watch those in our state-controlled media demonstrate their obvious bias night after night, week after week.  To watch how it was that they provided all manner of cover to the candidate they favored.  They did all they could to tilt the election in favor of Hitlery.

And still she made the claim that she and Barry are supporting President-elect Donald Trump’s transition because “it is important for the health of this nation that we support the commander-in-chief.”  Is that why during the same interview she said, “See, now we’re feeling what not having hope feels like?”  And she went on to say, “Hope is necessary. It’s a necessary concept. And Barack didn’t just talk about hope because he thought it was just a nice slogan to get votes.”  No, of course not!

The Obamas will remain at the White House until Inauguration Day on January 20, the same on which we will watch the exterminators roll in as the Obamas roll out.  Shortly after their departure I’m quite sure we will see the typical big blue tent draped over the White House as the fumigation process begins.  And I have no doubt that the folks in the state-controlled media will make some manner of excuse for those images of the White House, but we’ll all know the real reason.  Bugs.



And the excuses keep on coming for why Hitlery lost to Donald Trump.  Let’s see, there was the “fake news” excuse, the “James Comey” excuse, and let’s not forget the “Russian hacking” excuse.  And just when we thought we’d heard it all, along comes ‘Slick Willy’, impeached ex-president and spouse of the most corrupt candidate to ever run for president, to offer yet another excuse.  You see, it’s according to the old ‘Slickmeister’ that while Donald Trump “doesn’t know much”, it seems that “one thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote for him.”

At least that’s what old ‘Slick” spewed to a local newspaper earlier this month.  ‘Slick’ was speaking to a reporter from The Record-Review, a weekly newspaper serving the towns of Bedford and Pound Ridge, New York, not far from the Clintons’ home in Chappaqua, New York.  The ex-president held court earlier this month in Katonah, New York, where he took questions from the reporter and other customers inside a small bookstore.  More than likely, in this particular locale, most of those present had voted for Hitlery and therefore were eager to accept ‘Slick’s’ theory.

When it came to the question of Russian cyberattacks damaging the candidacy of his wife, Hitlery, ‘Slick’ said, “you would need to have a single-digit IQ not to recognize what was going on.”  But he blamed FBI Director James Comey for her loss, telling those gathered around him that he had “cost her the election” by announcing with less than two weeks to go before the election that the bureau was examining fresh evidence related to her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.  After all, how else could someone so ‘qualified’ actually lose?

‘Slick’ confirmed that he had, in fact, received a phone call from Trump on the day after the election and said that the Manhattan billionaire was ‘strangely’ cordial, “like it was 15 years ago” when he was friendly with the Clintons and would socialize with them.  ‘Slick’ said Trump told him that Hitlery “was tougher than I thought she’d be.”  So I’m curious, just what was it that old ‘Slick’ might have been trying to imply, exactly, by describing Trump as being “strangely cordial?”  I guess when it comes to the classless Clintons, cordiality doesn’t apply when you lose.

‘Slick’ also scoffed at the standard claim from Trump and his team that the president-elect’s Election Day win represented a “landslide” victory, despite the fact that he lost the popular vote.  ‘Slick’ said, “Landslide? I got something like 370 electoral votes,” correctly recalling his 1992 total. He added, “That was a landslide.”  While that may be true, when you stop to consider the fact that Trump was predicted, by many of the so-called experts, to garner no more than roughly 180 electoral votes, the 304 he ended up winning can, and justifiably so, be referred to as a landslide.

And also in his attempt to mock Trump’s claim of an Electoral College “landslide”, what ‘Slick’ very clearly neglects to mention regarding his own claim of having ‘won’ “something like 370 electoral votes”, is the fact that had it not been for Third Party candidate Ross Perot being in the race, old ‘Slick’ would not only have never ‘won’ 370 electoral votes, but he very likely would never have won the election.  But he doesn’t ever want to go there.  He likes to continually portray himself as having been the obvious choice of millions of Americans regardless of political party.

Look ‘Slick’, how about we just cut to the chase, shall we?  The fact is Hitlery was never ahead and therefore she was never really ever going to win.  The proof of that played out right before our eyes every single night on our television screens.  While Trump was filling stadiums, Mrs. ‘Slick Willy’ couldn’t manage to fill a high school auditorium.  And it was talking head after talking head who doubted that all those bodies would actually translate into votes.  They chose instead to place their faith in the polls that they rest us were able to recognize as being clearly bogus.

Personally, I couldn’t be happier that the jig is, at long last, finally up for these two grifters. These two have swindled, coerced, bribed, slandered, lied to and bullied their way to the top and working class white men were joined by millions of other angry voters in America and took the bitch down.  All races, creeds, genders and even those of different sexual orientations come together in the effort to finally show them the door.  Yeah, just lie to folks, telling them how everyone is out to get them, and those angry conservative white dudes will prove themselves stupid and easily excitable.

Poor ‘Slick’. Most presidents are dead and buried before history writes their final review, but Hitlery’s loss gives ‘Slick’ quite a preview. America rejected another Clinton, but more to the point America elected Trump.  Even a potential Trump presidency was seen as being better than another Clinton.  He was called a rapist during the second debate and nobody jumped to his defense.  His accusers were there, all eyes were on him, his daughter was sitting with him and he looked angry. And the Clinton Foundation has been exposed for the shakedown organization it is.

‘Slick’ has to know that that’s his legacy: that he’s nothing more than a crooked, alleged rapist whom very few, except the most hardcore of Democrats, wanted to see back in the White House, in any capacity.  And now with Hitlery suffering her second defeat in as many attempts, dare we hope that, when it comes to the Clintons, our long national nightmare is finally over?  After all, it seems like they’ve been around forever.  I wish I could confidently say that I think we’ve heard the last from them, but somehow I very much doubt it.  I don’t think we could be THAT lucky!



As you may, or may not recall, Barry “Almighty” began his journey to the White House with onlookers fainting upon the mere sound of his voice.  And it would appear that as that journey comes to an end, it was his 2016 press conference swan song, last Friday, that witnessed a reporter swoon.  So it is then that the Fourth Estate remains about the only group that still gets the vapors whenever Barry speaks. The rest of us fall asleep. Listeners bore quickly to the sound of a voice that so excites the speaker.

That, in a nutshell, serves as the reason people fall unconscious to the president’s voice.  Eight years of talking has that effect on an audience, sure. So does saying something one knows to be a lie, over and over again, on such a large stage.  Barry uttered only lies and half-truths on Friday.  Mostly he spoke about his favorite subject, that being of course, himself.  Because you must admit that there is absolutely nothing that Barry enjoys talking about more than, himself.

Barry noted, “As I was preparing to take office, the unemployment rate was on its way to 10 percent.”  And he added, “Today it is at 4.6 percent, the lowest in nearly a decade.”  He went on to tell those members of the state-controlled media who still, after all this time, hang on his every word, “When I came into office, 44 million people were uninsured.”  And he bragged, “Today we have covered more than 20 million of them.”  But of course he neglected to mention at what cost.

And of course Barry went on to very confidently declare, “Over the past eight years no foreign terrorist organization has successfully executed an attack on our homeland that was directed from overseas.”  Take it from Barry, if there is one thing certain in this world it’s that Barack Hussein Obama will most certainly go down as being one of this nation’s all-time great presidents.  And those of our state-controlled media most certain have, and continue to, take Barry’s word for that.

It was during this final press conference that these intrepid reporters asked questions (mostly about Vlad Putin and Donald Trump) but they didn’t question.  They didn’t question what it means to “cover” people who face a $6,000 deductible?  Or does the caveat “directed from overseas” really matter much to the families of victims in San Bernardino, Boston, and Orlando?  Such inquiries never crossed the lips of those whose job is to act on the part of the people and to hold our politicians to account.

Not that they had much time to.  Because while Barry’s party may have restricted the filibuster in the Senate, no such limitations were place on our Liar-in-Chief.  America’s 44th president’s time in office was little more than an eight-year, one-way gabfest.  And it’s in looking back over the course of his presidency that one would observe that he only ever takes responsibility for those things he views as having gone right, but never for what the rest of us view as having gone horribly wrong.

And where Barry’s words once evoked all the excitement of a preacher, well, now they remind one more of the pedantry of a professor.  His speeches which once stimulated, now seem to be just what the doctor ordered when it comes to those nights when one may have difficulty falling asleep. Despite surrounding himself with all manner of stars and celebrities, the national monologist continues to violate the first rule of show business: leave the audience wanting more, not less.

So it was then at the last official press conference of his presidency, Barry proceeded to give himself a pretty enthusiastic pat on the back.  Barry opened the press conference by touting his economic and policy achievements before heaping praise on his own shoulders.  Barry said, “Almost every country on Earth sees America as stronger and more respected today than they did eight years ago.”  Most Americans, I’m sure, were more than a little confused by Barry’s assessment.

Barry went on to say, “In other words, by so many measures, our country is stronger and more prosperous than when we started.”  He said, “It is a situation that I am proud to leave for my successor, and it’s thanks to the American people.”  He added, “The hard work you put in and the sacrifices that you made for your families and communities, the businesses that you started or invested in and the way you looked out for one another, and I cannot be prouder to be your president.”

Barry epitomizes narcissism. Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration, and a lack of empathy for others.  Narcissism is a prerequisite for Liberalism. Feeling good about themselves motivates everything they do.  That’s why they are so corrupt and why so many ultimately end up as absolute evil.  And yet they are able to go to bed each night thinking they are a good person doing good.

This is why Barry, and liberals in general, are falling to the floor in a shrieking temper tantrum because they lost an election.  And it’s also why it is that they are manufacturing outlandish conspiracy theories as cover for the fact that middle-America has rejected their middle class killing policies. Their perceived need of a Hitlery totalitarian dictatorship wasn’t gratified so they’re going to take out their savagery on anyone who happens along.  Pretty pathetic.



I must say that up until quite recently I’ve never been much of a believer in conspiracy theories, whether they involved space aliens or corrupt politicians. But all this talk about Russian involvement, or alleged involvement, in the hacking of the DNC and how it affected the outcome of our recent election, really got me to thinking.  I began to wonder if perhaps there was some truth to the claims that hacking, allegedly committed by the Russians, might have had an impact on the election to the point where that involvement actually caused Hitlery to lose.

Many conservatives and Trump supporters have long been adamantly dismissive of the possibility that interference by Russian hackers, alleged or otherwise, actually changed the outcome of the 2016 election.  But they would do well to rethink things.  Because even a cursory glance back over the events of the past few years would reveal how the near constant meddling by the Russians absolutely played a role in denying Hitlery her rightful position as the first female president of these United States of America.  And such evidence should not simply be dismissed out of hand.

There are, upon closer inspection, a rather significant number of interesting examples that would seem to indicate just how it was that the Russians were able to manipulate events and to therefore successfully prevent Hitlery from winning the election.  Now I know there will be many who, no matter what proof I may offer, will chose to deny any and all involvement by the Russians.  So it’s for those deniers that I present the following rundown of events that point out how Hitlery’s seemingly invincible presidential campaign was brought down thanks Russian hacking efforts:

March 1996: Russian Spetsnaz Special Forces pepper Hitlery with sniper rifle fire as she lands in Sarajevo after the Bosnian War.  Shortly after, Russian hackers destroy all video footage of this event, replacing it with fake news accounts that Hitlery’s visit was peaceful.  Hitlery’s unbelievable bravery in Bosnia is subsequently disbelieved.

January 28, 2009: Russia-financed black hat hackers in Donetsk, Ukraine, hack Hitlery’s personal Blackberry and modify the emails she sends. An email demanding that Hitlery follow all Department of State email rules is quietly deleted, and replaced with a spoof email demanding the creation of a private email server stored at her personal home in New York.

May 2013: A Russian hack of Hitlery’s teleprompter modifies her speech to Banco Itau, altering her speech to say that her dream is “open borders” with the entire Western Hemisphere, instead of her original dream of “safe, well-regulated borders.”

February 2015: Chinese hackers in the employ of Moscow penetrate the Clinton Foundation and alter its payroll to pay men far more than women, causing the Clinton campaign embarrassment when this big imbalance is brought up, undermining their efforts to run a campaign on closing the pay gap.

May 2015: Rudolph Epstein, a minor Hitlery staffer co-opted by a Russian hacker’s girlfriend, convinces Hitlery’s campaign manager Robby Mook to outsource the campaign’s decision-making to a computer program named Ada. The program, though, is simply the work of hackers from Novosibirsk, who use it as a vehicle to sabotage Hitlery’s campaign while promoting various fake news storylines. The program steadily supplies Hitlery with terrible ideas, such as printing off literal “woman cards” and joking about wiping her email server “with a cloth.”

Dec. 22, 2015: A group of Moscow hackers gain access to Hitlery’s campaign website, posting an embarrassing fake news article about how “Hillary Clinton is just like your abuela.” This fake news damages Hitlery’s campaign by causing an unjustified backlash from the public who regard it as ethnic pandering by Hitlery.

March 13, 2016: A Russian spy in Hitlery’s campaign swaps out her primary debate notes with doctored copies produced by Russian intelligence. The doctored notes include a line saying Hitlery wants to put coal miners out of work, which Clinton mistakenly reads, alienating working class whites across the country.

March 15, 2016: The same Russian spy implants electrodes on an unsuspecting Hitlery’s neck as she takes a nap, causing her to later bark like a dog during a rally in Reno, Nevada.

April 10, 2016: Russian agents in New York City advance $4 million into Bill de Blasio’s bank account, bribing him to make a joke about being on “C.P time” (colored people time) in his delayed endorsement of Hitlery for president. The nefarious ploy costs Hitlery thousands of black voters in swing states.

Sept. 7, 2016: Revolutionary Russian technology allows hackers to “hack” Clinton’s memories, causing her to forget entirely about the Benghazi attack and claim no Americans have died in Libya.

Sept. 11, 2016: Biologists tied to the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, use satellites to broadcast damaging rays directly into Clinton’s brain stem, causing her to abruptly collapse at a Sept. 11 memorial service after just 90 minutes outside in mild weather.

Oct. 18, 2016: Armenian hackers tied to Moscow burrow into Hitlery’s campaign bank account, diverting $1 million meant for voter turnout operations in Michigan to the non-competitive states of Indiana and Missouri. For good measure, the hackers also cancel a $2 million ad buy in Pennsylvania and Florida, buying replacement ads in Arizona instead.

Nov. 2, 2016: A hacker collective in Smolensk diverts Hitlery’s campaign plane away from General Mitchell International Airport in Milwaukee, forcing her to instead land in Tempe, Arizona, and campaign there. Thanks to this interference, Hitlery doesn’t have a single campaign stop in Wisconsin and narrowly loses the state to Donald Trump.

So there you have it.  And as much as I hate to admit it, it seems pretty obvious that old Vlad Putin made it possible for Donald Trump to win the election and become the 45th president of the United States.  Anyone require anymore proof?  Frankly, it all looks pretty cut and dried to me!  Let’s face it, it’s hard to deny that them crafty old Russians just might have played a bigger role in Trump’s victory than even I thought.  And if that doesn’t make you want to side with all those demanding recounts or for the Electoral College to elect Hitlery, then I don’t suppose anything will.