Smiley 3

Well, well, well, what do we have here?  Yet another racist punk turns out to be a racist, and a serial, pervert as well.  And thus we have another race baiting holier-than-thou, POS going down in flames.  I know, right?  And of course it is he of whom I speak that is none other than that well-known race-baiter, Tavis Smiley, whose longtime talk show, subsidized by your tax dollars, on PBS has now been ‘suspended’ over what were called “troubling allegations” regarding Smiley’s penchant for sexually harassing staffers, and retaliating against those who refused his manliness.

Smiley has a long history of being racist.  And while he has stated that the first black president did very little to help those in the black community, he always had a number of excuses at the ready for why that was.  And it was after receiving several allegations that he had engaged in sexual relationships with subordinates, and created a hostile work environment, PBS reached out to a law firm to investigate the claims. A PBS spokesperson told the Daily News, “The inquiry uncovered multiple, credible allegations of conduct that is inconsistent with the values and standards of PBS.”

While the spokesperson declined to go into great detail regarding the complaints, sources told Variety that Smiley would use his position as one of the networks longest-serving talk show hosts, to entice his subordinates into having sex with him.  According to Variety, some witnesses even said they felt like the status of their employment hinged on their sexual relationship with Smiley.  Other complaints against Smiley included verbal abuse, as well as threats and retaliation against any who complained.  After all, how dare anyone refuse a studly specimen like Tavis.

According to Variety:  In a February piece in the Observer, Jacques Hyzagi, a former producer on Smiley’s television show, wrote that Smiley’s “misogyny is always creeping around, barely camouflaged by Midwestern good manners.” Hyzagi described Smiley picking up a woman at the Orlando airport and bringing her along on a reporting trip as a “f*ck buddy”: alleged that Smiley had a romantic relationship with another producer; and quoted Smiley denigrating PBS executives.  Smiley has made his political leaning, his racial biases, well-known in his ten-plus years at PBS.

It was on Smiley’s show in May of 2015, that Susan Sarandon blamed America’s homeless problem on former President Ronald Reagan, a position that Smiley appeared to agree with.  On November of 2017, Smiley and Vagina Monologues creator Eve Ensler wondered why so many women voted for President Trump, given his alleged history of harassing women.  Eventually, the two decided that women who voted for Trump were “self-loathing.”  And he’s also had guests on his show to debate such worthwhile topics as “white rage” and “white nationalism” in the age of Trump.

I’ve always been a big believer in that old adage, “What goes around, comes around.”  I’ve simply seen it play out too many times not to be a believer.  And never could there be a more worthy recipient of it than this twit, Smiley.  I’m sure most have observed Smiley’s denigrating of first, candidate, and now President, Trump.  This pompous sanctimonious hypocrite had no end of viscous personal attacks, using the megaphone provided by his show, while at the same time employing those considered to be the typical batch of sycophantic guests gleefully aping his viewpoints.

So here we have another liberal media type apparently biting the dust!  Liberals are the most perverted bunch of people on the planet!  Why have our tax dollars EVER been used to subsidize the extreme hate-whitey racist leftists like Smiley?  He’s always been a transparent phony-baloney.  He tries to drape himself in this pseudo-intellectual framework, complete with his stylized speech patterns and fake eyebrow contortions. And I must say that is better than hearing how Charlie Rose, the other PBS douchebag, recently got kicked to the curb. What a way to end the year!

Smiley oftentimes seemed to be seething with a rage that he was barely able to control. I think he has used it throughout his career to intimidate and manipulate the people around him, whether they be co-workers or guests on his program with whom he disagreed.  These allegations come as no surprise and seem to be about the only mechanism for changing the programming at both PBS and NPR, death or removal by sexual harassment. I swear there’s been little or no change in the programming of these government-sponsored propaganda outlets, or their hosts, for years.

And it was in responding to these accusations, as well as the decision to suspend his show, that on Wednesday night Smiley took to Facebook posting a video and statement in which he claims that he has “never groped, coerced, or exposed myself inappropriately to any workplace colleague in my entire broadcast career, covering 6 networks over 30 years.”  He wrote, “If having a consensual relationship with a colleague years ago is the stuff that leads to this kind of public humiliation and personal destruction, heaven help us.”  Yup, it’s Smiley who’s the REAL victim here.

Anyway, Smiley went on to add, “PBS overreacted and conducted a biased and sloppy investigation, which led to a rush to judgment, and trampling on a reputation that I have spent an entire lifetime trying to establish.”  I guess the only thing left now is for him to accuse PBS of basing their decision to suspend him on nothing other than racism.  I mean, isn’t that ALWAYS the first response from blacks who feel that they have somehow been treated unfairly.  That this is only now happening to him because he’s black?  I’m sure that’s coming.  It’s really only a matter of time.

Now it occurs to me that those on the left seem to now be operating what is nothing more than a modern day secular version of the Inquisition, carried out during the middle ages and the aim of which was to combat heresy, by publicly pillorying those equipped with a penis who “they” have determined do not adequately worship, or hold in sufficient reverence, the female of the species.  Charges are laid, no defense is permitted, and public humiliation and destruction of the accused’s livelihood is automatic.  In their basic function, all inquisitions operate pretty much alike.

And even with all that said, had old Tavis tended to be just a bit less racist in his opinions and had he demonstrated just a bit more genuine concern for those in the black community, I might feel a little sorry for him.  Instead, he’s really nothing more than just another black mouthpiece for the Democrat Party, and someone willing to use his fellow blacks as way of making himself a lot of money and gaining for himself more than a little notoriety.  The only person that Smiley truly cares about is, Smiley.  So like I said, all we’re seeing here is another example of what goes around…




I’ve never been one for late night television.  At least since the days, and I may be showing my age here, of Johnny Carson.  And with the arrival of Leno I watched a little less, and I did watch a little Letterman in his early days.  And with those who have now assumed the helm of late night, it’s become no longer worth my time.  Regardless of which of these knuckleheads, Fallon, Colbert, Meyers or O’Brien, we may be talking about, there seems to be not a dime’s worth of difference between any of these supposed late night comics.  They all seem to have forgotten what it was that brought folks back night after night to watch Carson.  They’ve forgotten that it’s supposed to be about being funny, not gross, rude, inappropriate, or political to the extreme.  Which brings me to he who can very easily be considered the ‘Poster Child’ for this the latest batch of imbecilic late night TV hosts, Jimmy Kimmel.

And to see why it is that I say that we need look back no further than Kimmel’s politically inspired diatribe from this past Monday night when we were supposed to believe that Kimmel was actually moved to tears over the recent Las Vegas attack.  It was during what he described as being his opening monologue that Kimmel set about pushing for more gun control before proceeding to bad-mouth Republicans.  But he said not a word about the number of innocents gunned down in Chicago each and every month.  Knowing as we do what his political affiliation is we shouldn’t have been surprised.  But that said, Kimmel was right to lament the “59 innocent” who are dead as result of the Las Vegas attack, but as is usually the case with these celebrity zealots from the left they are rather selective when it comes to those issues that they choose to highlight and then go on a rampage about.

Because nowhere in Kimmel’s diatribe/monologue was there any lamentations for the more than 63 individuals who were killed on average every single month in Chicago during 2016 (the Chicago Tribune reported a total of 762 murders for 2016).  Nor was there any mention of the nearly 4,400 victims who were shot and wounded during 2016.  But Kimmel, as someone who is likely constantly surrounded by his own well-armed security team, actually suggested that Republicans ought to be ashamed of themselves for not passing more gun control now.  Chicago is a tough one for those on the left because all manner of gun control imaginable has been tried, including an all-out ban on handguns — so Chicago is actually a case study in the ineffectiveness of gun control; an example of how murder numbers rise when strict gun control laws are in place.  So what they do is to pretend that it simply doesn’t exist.

Kimmel responded to critics on Tuesday, essentially blaming them for “the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want.”  And it was in making such a ludicrous statement that Kimmel accomplished little more then to make quite clear, to anyone who might have happened to tune in, just how ignorant of the facts he truly is.  He began by saying, “I want to send special good wishes to those watching from Las Vegas, where you know what happened on Sunday night. I’m not gonna get deep into it again, I said what I had to say last night.”  He then went on to say, “But I do want to say something to these nuts who spent most of the day today on television and online attacking those of us who think we need to do something about the fact that 59 innocent people were killed.”  He said, “They say it’s inappropriate to be talking about it because it’s too soon.”

And it was then that he went on to add, “Well maybe it’s too soon for you, because deep down inside in your heart, you know you bear some responsibility for the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want, and now you want to cover yourself until the storm of outrage passes, and you can go back to your dirty business as usual.”  And he concluded his idiotic rant by saying, “But it’s not too soon for us.”  And added, “because we’re Americans, and the last time I checked, the First Amendment is at least as important as the Second Amendment, so we will talk about it, and shame on you for suggesting we do otherwise.”  So what makes this turd, who has a team of ‘writers’ writing his material for him and who, apparently, has Chuckie Schumer as a consultant, think we’re ok with being lectured to?  Maybe before he starts shooting mouth off he should search out the facts.

And yet, Kimmel offered nothing in the way of an apology for his deception during his Tuesday night ‘monologue’, nor did he rectify his failure to ‘cry’ over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — 536 so far this year — the way he ‘cried’ over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada.  Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it.  By Kimmel’s logic, those who are opposed to the Second Amendment can be said to share responsibility for the mass slaughters by governments of their own citizens.  This collectivism is one of the dangers of the socialist ideology.  A collective is a group.  Socialists want people in groups.  They identify their supporters in groups and then they group and attack their opponents in the same way.  They create and continue their division through this collectivist ideology.

But let’s face it, Kimmel is only doing what his masters tell him to do.  He’s virtue signaling like all get out.  His ‘crocodile tears’ are as phony as his acting.  Of course he’s going to politicize this tragedy.  His does the same with healthcare and his constant attacking of Republicans.  He’s nothing more than a partisan hack doing the Democrats’ dirty work.  His ‘tears’ and ‘heartfelt feelings’ on the tragedy in Las Vegas are all fake…just like him.  Of course he’s not going to shed any tears of concern for the people in Chicago getting shot and killed every month there.  He doesn’t care.  He didn’t get the script with the talking points all laid out for him to speak.  He has cues to learn, you know.  He would never bring what happens in Chicago up because guess who controls that city, and nearly every other big city, the Democrats.  It would make them look bad.  So it all has to be against the Republicans, all the time.

While this recent shooting was indeed a tragedy, I think we need to keep in mind that it’s on average that there are 96 deaths per day in America resulting from auto crashes.  And are those deaths any less tragic?  And where’s Kimmel’s outrage over CAFE standards?  Or for the 91 Americans who die every day from an opioid overdose.  Excessive drinking kills 1 in 10 Americans.  About 1 in 8 Americans, and Kimmel may be one himself, are considered alcoholics.  The top causes of death in America are Heart disease 633,842, Cancer 595,930, chronic lower respiratory diseases 155,041, Accidents 146,571, Stroke 140,323, Alzheimer’s disease 110,561, Diabetes 79,535, Influenza and pneumonia 57,062.  With all the planning and horror the shooter inflicted upon an innocent crowd of 20,000 the numbers reveal 99.7% of them escaped alive and it’s no small measure the miracle that is.

With the radical liberals in Congress and Hollyweird saying that all country western fans are Republican gun nuts and making their insane comments can we also assume then that the shooter was a Democrat or a Hitlery supporter.  Because in nearly every violent act, shooting related or otherwise, the perpetrator is nearly ALWAYS some nut from the Left.  The Left and their ilk are responsible for nearly all major acts of violence in the world.  They always dismiss the actual murderers who identify with them, and immediately blame anyone and everyone else who are not on the Left.  Calling them out on their playbook, showing others their instant response is always to defend the criminal or terrorist murderers by providing the cover of blaming everyone else.  Be that the NRA or the Second Amendment.  Maybe what we need to place a limit on is Liberals being able to buy a gun.

The people that are shot in Chicago, and in every other major, Democrat controlled city, are willingly sacrificed by those on the left because it allows them to generate higher gun violence numbers in the U.S. which they can then use to justify the need for more, and far stricter, gun laws.  That is why they tend not to prosecute the criminals to the fullest extent of the law.  And yet where’s the outrage from Kimmel about that?  There is none.  Because to point that out would be seen as breaking ranks.  This is simply selective outrage of the left on parade.   Kimmel has blood on his hands, he is one of the alt left fascists acting as a megaphone for people like Hitlery, Bernie and failed ex-president Obummer. Helping them get out their calls for violence against President Trump and his supporters.  Encouraging alt left fascist violence with a chuckle and a nod.  Well, you leftists got your wish.

The sad truth is that Democrats care far more about their agenda than they do about the people who foolishly vote for them.  But that seems to bother folks like Kimmel very little.  Kimmel, still isn’t being honest with America.  And he seems to have no problem whatsoever when it comes to spewing his dishonest drivel whether he’s talking about healthcare or gun control.  He seems only too willing to intentionally mislead people by failing to disclose, for example, how he had been prepped for months by Chuckie Schumer regarding his recent rant on yet another Republican attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare.  He kept that all very well hidden because had he divulged that information, he would have been discredited as being nothing more than partisan political hack.  Not that many of those who tune in to watch his antics every night would care one way or the other.  They’re as sick as he is.



Democrats/Liberals/progressives/socialists, or whatever moniker they wish to go by these days, it’s those on the left who really do live in what can only be described as being a constant state of denial.  Because it’s whenever they lose any sort of contest that it must always be because either someone cheated or those responsible for electing, or selecting, the winner were somehow biased against them.  It can never be because they were a poor candidate or a contestant lacking the necessary talent to actually win.  Such is the case with Hitlery, who over the course of the last 10 months has blamed everyone, and everything, imaginable for losing a contest that nearly all but her opponent thought that she had in the bag.  Everyone but herself, that is.

And it has been 99 percent of those involved in the state-controlled media who have been doing their best to bolster her claims that she was somehow robbed of her much deserved victory by Donald Trump.  Because there is simply no way that he could have possibly won without cheating.  And now joining in the blame-everything-but-Hitlery-game is none other than Supreme Court Justice ‘Ruth Buzzy’ Ginsburg, who believes sexism is what really put President Trump in the White House.  It was when asked by the Communist Broadcasting System’s (CBS) Charlie Rose in an interview conducted earlier this week that she said, “I have no doubt that it did.”  Old ‘Buzzy’ went on to add that sexism “was a major, major factor” in Hitlery’s devastating loss last year.

Now for those able to remember, old ‘Buzzy’ made no such comments back in 2008 when it was Obummer who handily defeated Hitlery, ruining her historic moment of becoming the first female U.S. president.  But then, perhaps that has much more to do with ‘Buzzy’s’ personal feelings toward President Trump.  After all, she was one of the harsher critics of then candidate Trump, going so far as to once tell The New York Times that she couldn’t imagine him as president and the negative affects he would have on the country.  ‘Buzzy’ said it would only be four years for the country but for the Supreme Court, “It could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”  Now she has since apologized for those comments, so that makes it alright.

The Democrats remind me of an old soap opera. They use the same plot in every show and continue to get away with their bad acting.  Can you imagine the Democrats if they were unable to use the ‘blame game?’  If they weren’t protected by the state-controlled media and were instead made to abide by the same rules they impose on everyone else?  Can you imagine the Democrats if they always had to make very clear what it is that they truly do stand for?  Imagine if the Democrats we held accountable to the same regulations that they impose upon their enemies, we the American people. They’d never win another election.  They continue to thrive only because their supporters are comprised of some of the most ignorant people on the planet.

And when it comes to old ‘Buzzy’, she’s the type of individual that Liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans love to first nominate and then expend every effort to get them quickly confirmed.  And they do this because they know these people are far less interested in determining the constitutionality of any law than they are in dreaming up new ways to ‘interpret’ what the Constitution says.  It’s called judicial activism.  Old ‘Buzzy’ has proven time and time again that she has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.  Her opinions as a Justice are extreme.  At least she was truthful when saying many women voted for Hitlery because Hitlery said vote for me if you are a woman because I am a woman.  If that doesn’t define ‘sexism’, what does?

Let’s face it, had Hitlery not been a woman, she would have never received her party’s nomination in the first place.  And she lost the election not because Trump cheated, but because people saw how she had received preferential treatment and was let off the hook for the minimum of 58 felonies that she committed, but wasn’t prosecuted for, not to mention her ‘Pay to play’ with the Clinton foundation.  I mean, how else does someone who’s ‘serving’ our nation end up with $200 Million, plus, fortune on a $186,000 a year salary?  Or was it her consistently horrible performance first as a U.S. Senator and then as Secretary of State, her extreme progressive views, specifically in relation to the promises she made regarding the Supreme Court?

Far from deserving to be in the White House, or allowed to remain free to go across the country on a book tour where she charges folks $300 a pop just to sign her book, Hitlery should instead be serving a life sentence in Leavenworth.  ‘Buzzy’ yet again shows her own bias in failing to see that Hitlery’s behavior has been abhorrent and is what resulted in many voters coming to see her as being profoundly untrustworthy and therefore not worthy of their vote.  That’s why she lost.  And yet Ginsburg can blame, and with what I can only guess is her version of a straight face, Hitlery’s defeat on ‘sexism.’  Which says much more about her mind than it does about any actual events or circumstances surrounding our most recent presidential election.

Look, we all know that Obummer won the presidency with more than 95% of blacks voting for him instead of the white guys, McCain or Romney, then men who ran against him.  So could we possibly expect to hear from old ‘Buzzy’ how it was that the only reason Obummer was able to win either election was because of racism?  Somehow I doubt it.  And you know, since when does simply by virtue of you being a female, erase the fact that you are nothing more than a cheating, lying, criminal politician and grifter?  Hitlery was rejected because everyone who possess a vagina failed to vote for her because she has a vagina.  Vaginas do not create anything notable concerning ones character.  And Hitlery is evidence of that fact.

But in a way, I guess you could say that old ‘Buzzy’ is correct when she says that sexism played a major role in our last election.  But that would only be because the Democrats were desperate in their attempt to elect a president based solely on the gender of their candidate and not on any specific qualifications that she can be said to have possessed.  And they promoted the kind of agenda that women able to think for themselves, and who didn’t want to vote for Hitlery, would never support.  And then Democrats said those women were stupid and unintelligent.  Yup, that’s sexism alright.   Good thing many women didn’t buy into that crap and helped to elect a real president, one who represents all of us not just one of the many ‘victim’ groups.



I’ve never been able to quite figure out why, when it comes to politics, anyone would want to be taking their cues from those morons, past or present, whose only claim to fame is that they host, or have hosted, a late night television show.  Once upon a time, a very long time ago, I did on occasion like to tune into watch Letterman.  But as time went on it was somewhere along the way that his need to lecture us regarding our politics seemed to take over and he became much less enjoyable to watch.  To the point that when he finally retired I never really watched him at all.  He had become more than a little boring.  Politics wasn’t then, just as it still isn’t, why I would watch any of these late night losers.  They are all left leaning losers with whom I have absolutely no interest in watching.

And so it was that recently Letterman chose to resurface, coming out of hibernation to in order to slam President Trump and various members of his administration in a lengthy ‘interview’ with New York magazine, explaining that he’d still love to interview the real estate mogul-turned-president one final time.  And according to Letterman, today’s late-night shows have an “obligation” to challenge the president, and described how he would interview Trump if he could get one final shot at him.  He said, “I would just start with a list. ‘You did this. You did that. Don’t you feel stupid for having done that, Don? And who’s this goon Steve Bannon, and why do you want a white supremacist as one of your advisers? Come on, Don, we both know you’re lying. Now, stop it.’”

Now I may be wrong, but I don’t recall ever hearing about how Dave interviewed Barry in such a disrespectful manner.  I don’t recall Dave saying, “Hey Barry, what’s it like having as your vice President a pervert who enjoys skinny dipping in front of female Secret Service personnel?”  Or asking, “Barry, did you really think that whole ‘Fast and Furious’ gun running scheme was a good idea?”   Or how he could have said to Barry, “Man, I thought it was a work of genius to use the IRS to go after those scumbag conservative groups!”  Nor did he ask, “Do you ever have any second thoughts about giving all that taxpayer money to Solyndra?”  I mean the number of questions he could have asked Barry “Almighty” goes on and on but, strangely enough, Dave never bothered asking any of them.

So anyway, what follows are but a few excerpts from New York‘s interview with Dave:

On his previous interviews with Trump, before he announced for the presidency, Letterman said, “He was a joke of a wealthy guy. We didn’t take him seriously. He’d sit down, and I would just start making fun of him. He never had any retort. He was big and doughy, and you could beat him up. He seemed to have a good time, and the audience loved it, and that was Donald Trump. Beyond that, I remember a friend in the PR business told me that he knew for a fact — this was three or four presidential campaigns ago — that Donald Trump would never run for president; he was just monkeying around for the publicity. So I assumed that was the story and now it turns out he’s the president.”  Funny, he was never that disrespectful when it came to Barry “Almighty”.

And on Trump’s Cabinet and advisers, he said, “It’s delightful. Kellyanne Conway was my favorite for a long time. This thing about her telling everyone, ‘Go buy Ivanka’s shoes; I’m going to go buy Ivanka’s shoes. Hell, I’ll buy you a pair of Ivanka’s shoes.’ Then they had to counsel her. Boy, if this administration decides you need counseling — whoa. And poor Sean Spicer is a boob who just got out of a cab and now here he is. Then the other kid, is it Miller?”  He said, “[Stephen Miller.] Wow, that guy is creepy. He fell out of a truck. And the guy from Exxon, Rex Tillerson. Don would say, “Rex, if you’re talking to your friends, ask them” — I’m sure the Russians groomed Trump. They gave him tips: “You want to be an authoritarian dictator? Sure, that’s not a problem. We’ll tell you how to do it, for God’s sake.”

It was on Trump’s dust-up with Rep. John Lewis that Letterman also ad an opinion.  He said, “Holy God. First of all, because I’m always thinking about myself, I think, I was about John Lewis’s age when he marched across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Would I have had the guts to do that? The all-talk John Lewis goes down there and gets a goddamned skull fracture. I mean, Trumpy will never have to worry about a skull fracture because of the hair. Thank you! How do you know if Donald Trump is lying? His lips are moving. Thank you! But in addition to every other thing that’s wrong with the Trump, he’s ignorant in a way that’s insulting to the office, insulting to America, insulting to human rights, insulting to civil rights, insulting to John Lewis. Trump saying that broke my heart.”

Look, I just remember the tantrum that Letterman pitched when Leno got the ‘Tonight Show’ job and he didn’t.  What a crybaby!  Maybe that’s what made old Dave snap, I’m not sure.  But the proof was in the pudding because it was only a handful of times, over the years, that he never topped Leno in the ratings.  But to tell you the truth I never thought Leno was all that funny either, he was a bit less obvious about his politics, however, which did make it a bit easier to watch him.  But none of these late night ‘comedians’ are someone who should be sought out for their political insight or because of their deep and awe-inspiring intellect.  I mean let’s face it, none of them are particularly bright, so what would make anyone think that their opinion on any issue might really matter?

Letterman destroyed late night television, at least for me, with his massive ego and ignorant political commentaries.  He was known for his stunts like adjusting his tie, or driving thru a McDonalds drive thru several times.  It grew old very fast and he just couldn’t face the fact that it was time to go.  He was another of those who had become so addicted to the spotlight he couldn’t see the end was at hand.  Now he throws in his two cents worth on our President.  And he has joined the ranks of Al Gore with the ridiculous beard, always a cry for attention.  Frankly, it’s kinda sad.  His “satire” was always too safe to be called “satire”.  If you want to be a true satyr you must also go after the politically incorrect topics.  It’s fine to be a coward and to stay safe making only main stream accepted jokes.  But it’s not satire.

And like I said earlier, there was a time when I thought Letterman was pretty good and worth tuning in to watch.  He was almost enjoyable to watch back then.  He had what was a truly innovative approach to late night talk show comedy.  I loved that he had absolutely no patience with celebrity pretentiousness!  When those show businesses twits came on, he insisted that they raise their game and not just sit there looking pretty.  And then, as we got to know him through the Nineties and beyond, his warped political views and even worse personal behavior just turned me off.  He probably stayed on television ten years too long because it was obvious that he was bored with what he was doing.  Too bad.  For a while there he was really fun to watch.



So riddle me this, why is it that anyone with the slightest amount of commonsense would want to waste any amount of time listening to some wacky leftwing TV cook regarding their opinion on American politics?  Especially one that is little more than just another brain-dead liberal.  It’s right up there with choosing to listen to the many ‘half-baked’ Hollyweird loons who spew their idiotic drivel.  But it was in an interview with Reason magazine that Anthony Bourdain, and rather surprisingly so, confessed that he is “nauseated” by the contempt with which “privileged Eastern liberals such as myself” hold their fellow red state Americans.

Apparently, Mr. Bourdain, well-known celebrity cook and self-described “privileged Eastern liberal”, slammed his fellow leftist elites this week, arguing that their disdain for working-class Americans is what helped to create “the upswell of rage and contempt” that in turn helped to propel Donald Trump to the presidency.  Bourdain was quoted as saying, “The utter contempt with which privileged Eastern liberals such as myself discuss red-state, gun-country, working-class America as ridiculous and morons and rubes is largely responsible for the upswell of rage and contempt and desire to pull down the temple that we’re seeing now.”

He said, “I’ve spent a lot of time in gun-country, God-fearing America. There are a hell of a lot of nice people out there, who are doing what everyone else in this world is trying to do: the best they can to get by, and take care of themselves and the people they love. When we deny them their basic humanity and legitimacy of their views, however different they may be than ours, when we mock them at every turn, and treat them with contempt, we do no one any good. Nothing nauseates me more than preaching to the converted.”  As far as I’m concerned Bourdain is just one more leftwing hypocrite on what has come to be a very long list of many.

Bourdain, who is a New York City native and an outspoken critic of the president-elect, said he thinks “the rise of authoritarianism” is a “global trend and one that should be of concern to everyone.” Still, he argued, the belittling or dismissive attitudes of his peers toward Trump’s supporters is counterproductive.  He said, “The self-congratulatory tone of the privileged left — just repeating and repeating and repeating the outrages of the opposition — this does not win hearts and minds.”  And then he went on to say, “It doesn’t change anyone’s opinions. It only solidifies them and makes things worse for all of us.”  Pretty profound for a cook.

Apparently he was also asked his opinion of HBO host Bill Maher.  Bourdain appeared on Maher’s show Real Time a few years back and, as we can see, it didn’t leave a very favorable impression.  And it was regarding Mr. Maher that Bourdain said, “[Maher is] insufferably smug. Really the worst of the smug, self-congratulatory left. I have a low opinion of him. I did not have an enjoyable experience on his show. Not a show I plan to do again. He’s a classic example of the smirking, contemptuous, privileged guy who lives in a bubble. And he is in no way looking to reach outside, or even look outside, of that bubble, in an empathetic way.”

With all that said I think it might be worth noting Bourdain really ain’t that much of a fan of those who live in flyover country either.  As proof of that I offer other comments of note from the TV cook which include the time that he said the world would only be at peace when Whites are bred out of existence.  Or when he attributed the supposed harmony of Singaporean society to miscegenation.  In reality, Singapore owes its orderliness to harsh laws that are very strictly enforced. The population there is 70 percent ethnic Chinese, and they give no sign of wanting to mix with the native Malay Muslims, imported Africans, or anyone else.

This guy Bourdain is another one of those left wing creeps who were they to be living in any country other than the good old U. S. of A., would be selling pencils on some street corner.  Like most of his leftwing compatriots who call Hollyweird home, he has more money than sense.  Personally, I think Mr. Bourdain is just another frustrated Hitlery supporter who has yet to come to grips with the fact that his favored candidate lost.  He too seems to suffer from that which has come to infect so many on the left known as Trump derangement syndrome.  I see his recent interview with Reason magazine as being little more than some weird form of therapy.


Maher 1

Ya know, if those on the left are so confident that Hitlery is going to beat Trump like a redheaded stepchild why is it that they continue to see the need for using such vitriolic rhetoric whenever talking about Trump.  Democrats, as well as their many socialist supporters, have become nearly apoplectic over the Trump candidacy.  And the reason I even bring this up is because the always charming Bill Maher recently made yet another profound statement in his already-long list of profound statements earlier this week when he went on one of his psychotic rants maligning black Republicans as “Uncle Toms” and comparing Trump’s sons to Nazis.

In a live version of his HBO freak show, ‘Real Time’, Maher chided any minority that dares to vote for Trump, especially black Americans, calling them the derogatory “Uncle Tom,” essentially saying that the color of their skin dictates how they should think and vote.  In short, Maher has now officially outed himself as being a racist.  Maher said, “New rule: Marginalized black Republicans and marginalized gay Republicans have to come together and form a new group called The Uncle Tom’s Log Cabin Republicans.”  And the fact that such a statement actually prompted laughter, paints a pretty sad picture of those watch this boob.

Maher also directed his mean-spirited smugness at Donald Trump’s sons, going on to use that all-too-common leftist trope by comparing them to Nazis.  Maher said, “There was there was an outbreak of Norovirus, the one they get on cruise ships, at the convention.”  And this reject from some mental ward went on to say, “They said avoid shaking hands. So, if you see the Trump boys, just Sieg Heil and walk right on by.”  Maher later expanded on this German Nazi theme when he said: “Do people realize if they are elected Donald Trump, really the people that are going to be running the country are Douche Bag Von Fuckface Trump and Thurston Shit Bag III?”

This Hitler comparison nonsense has gotten to be pretty lame and pathetic, to say nothing of the fact that after years of having used it you’d think these people who are supposed to be so clever could have long ago come up with something new. The liberals have worn out this insult and need to conjure up some new irrelevant label in an effort to try to keep their dystopian dreams alive. If these ignoramuses were only half as intelligent and witty as they think they are, they’d realize that the party that they claim allegiance to has vastly more similarities to the Nazis, including the most obvious one socialism, than does the party they hate.

And why is it that whenever people think of evil people, the first and only person that seems to ever come to mind is Adolf Hitler?!  Have we forgotten what Joseph Stalin did in his own country?  Or how about Mao Tse Tung, or Pol Pot or even Saddam Hussein?!  Do people think that these people somehow pale in comparison to Hitler?  Personally I’m far more concerned about the prospects of our country becoming another Venezuela, a direction in which we already seem to headed thanks to their hero, Barry!  That’s a far more real concern than is fearing Trump is somehow another Hitler!  And it’s the socialist policies of the left that are greatest cause for concern.

But I find as being the most disturbing is the fact that someone can get away with spewing this kind of blatant racism on national TV and not suffer any kind of backlash or consequences.  And you’ll notice that it’s this kind of language is ALWAYS coming from someone on the left.  Now you would think that such rhetoric would draw condemnation from those whom such language is used to promote or defend, but since more often than not it’s always directed at someone on the right it is therefore seen as being acceptable.  Which makes it all the more clear just what frauds race baiters like Sharpton and Jackson really are!

I realize that Maher supposed to be a “comedian”, and I use that term VERY loosely, and likely sees himself as being some sort of a social activist.  But outside the bizarre little clique he’s neither.  It makes me wonder what type of people are watching shows like his and The View that keep these shows alive. The idiocy of people like Maher is mind numbing, believing that black people who have conservative values are Uncle Tom’s and sell outs to their race. The amount of truth and facts that people would have to ignore and dismiss to conclude that the Democrat Party is the one that has the minorities best interests at heart is absolutely astounding.



When it comes to more recent New York City politics it’s pretty obvious that the nut doesn’t fall very far from the tree.  But since he has served in both Boston and Los Angeles, Mr. Bratton’s rather leftward slant regarding gun rights, besides coming as no surprise, likely made him the ideal choice as, current communist mayor of ‘The Big Apple’, Bill de Blasio’s police commissioner.  This is his second shot at being the city’s top cop, the first time around Bratton was forced to resign while under investigation for accepting unauthorized trips from corporations as well as individuals.  Which I guess, was seen as being a resume enhancer.

Anyway, it was on Communist News Network (CNN) earlier this week that New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton was discussing terrorism and Donald Trump, and after watching a clip host Don Lemon played featuring Trump saying that Americans are under threat from foreign terrorists coming in to this country, Bratton responded by saying that it’s Americans and guns that are actually the biggest problem we face.  This has become the typical mantra of many on the left as they work to increase their efforts to rip from the hands of law abiding Americans that which is something constitutionally guaranteed to them.

Frankly, it’s this kind of idiotic drivel, that Americans are somehow more of a threat to the country than are these Muslim terrorists, that is so offensive and on many fronts.  But is especially grotesque when hearing it from the top cop in the city that is now home to a somber memorial at Ground Zero. Terrorism, both domestic and foreign-born, has nothing to do with the availability of guns. The notion that the Second Amendment enables terror of any kind is demonstrably false — because that is what he is saying: not that we face a threat from criminals who use guns, but we face a threat from Americans “who have access to firearms.”

It’s all the gun’s fault, you see. It’s the EASY access.  It’s not the threat from Islamic terrorists.  A threat that is on the rise, is brutal, leaves many casualties in its wake, is frequent, and has consequences well beyond just the tragic deaths and injuries.  And too many of our leaders, mostly Democrats, seem not to be all that concerned.  And you would think that a police commissioner should know these things.  That a New York City police commissioner, especially, should live and breathe them.  What a despicable, politically correct, factually bereft rant from a committed leftist gun-control fanatic. How typical. How utterly predictable.  How dangerous.

But Chief, if guns are illegal in Chicago, what the Hell is going on there?  How many gun related deaths have already occurred there in this still very young year?  Hold on a minute, I’ll tell you:  As of yesterday (30 Mar) 128 were shot and killed, 673 were shot and wounded.  Now I would argue that if guns were legal in ‘The Windy City, both numbers would not only be lower, but would likely be significantly lower.  But then, Bill, you don’t want to hear that.  But look, this latest example is but one more reason, on what apparently is a very long list of many, why Bratton is hated by the NYPD rank and file, and basically anyone with an ounce of sense who knows him.

Bratton’s idiotic premise that “Americans with guns pose a bigger threat than terrorism” is so patently false and for any number of reasons.  Not the least of which are: 1) It is physically impossible to eliminate the 300 million guns in America; only the LEGAL ones can regulated, but it’s the ILLEGAL ones which do the most damage. 2) Firearms accidents, etc., like far more pervasive automobile accidents, are relatively constant year-by-year, whereas terrorism has demonstrated at least the potential to grow exponentially, as it has recently in Europe. 3) And then, as we saw in San Bernardino, Americans WITHOUT Guns are really nothing more than soft targets for these murdering Muslims.  Imagine if just one of those victims had actually had a gun.  How much lower would the body count have been?

And what’s scary is the fact that this imbecile is responsible for keeping New Yorkers safe.  New Yorkers should be afraid, VERY afraid!  The biggest threat to our Constitution and our way of life are people like this guy who think our ‘rights’ are the problem.  My guess is this nut believes that Mike Brown was “shot with his hands in the air”.  It’s the dumbing down of America.  It should frighten every single American that complete morons like this boob are able to get into such positions, being responsible for things that are so far beyond the capabilities or their intelligence.  We insist upon granting to these losers on the left far too much control over our lives.