AL ‘NOT SO’ SHARPTON SHOOTING OFF HIS BIG MOUTH…AGAIN!!!

Sharpton 15

I get so tired of those on the left who insist that those of us on the right be made to play the game differently than the way they play it.  Word now comes that ‘Rev’ Al ‘Not So’ Sharpton, self-described ‘civil’ rights activist, community agitator, tax cheat and founder of the National Action Network, told reporters on a conference call this past Tuesday that Democrats should not bother meeting with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s recent nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Kennedy.

And it was in referencing Barry ‘O’s nominee to replace the late Antonin Scalia, Merrick Garland, in 2016 that Al said, “No Democrat should even meet with the judicial nominee Kavanaugh because no Republican would even meet with Garland.”  Sharpton said, “I think that the Democrats owe it to us to stall and really wait until after the election.” Sharpton said, “We can stop and stall.”  Actually, Democrats can really do neither, and it’s essentially their own fault, which is kinda funny.

Anyway, it was on this very same call, which included representatives from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the NAACP, that Sharpton accused the Republicans of having a “double standard” when it came to seeking to block Merrick because it was an election year, but now want to confirm Kavanaugh ahead of the midterm elections.  But actually Republicans then were doing nothing more than to play the game by the same rules that had been advocated by the Democrats.

Now of course the big difference here, which Sharpton ‘seems’ to be oblivious to, is the fact that Merrick’s nomination was made ahead of a presidential election, not a midterm election, and since it’s the Executive Branch and not the Legislative Branch that has the authority to nominate a potential justice to the high court I feel confident in saying that Sharpton is once again doing little more than to talk out his ass, which is something that he has become quite adept at over the years.

In fact, if the Democrats are able to earn back a majority in the Senate in the coming midterm elections, they would then be in a position to reject any of Trump’s Supreme Court nominees going forward.  But Sharpton and the others framed their opposition to Kavanaugh by implying that he somehow poses a threat to the civil rights of Americans, specifically “rights” to abortion and contraceptives on demand, universal health care, gay marriage, and racial consideration for college admission.

Leftwing kook Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee, actually made the rather idiotic claim that the Trump administration wants to “reverse and undermine civil rights across this country.”  Clarke also called for “carefully and cautiously” vetting Judge Kavanaugh to determine if he is “capable” of doing the job, despite his lengthy judicial record, including his present post on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Actually, I think old Al has a GREAT idea.  Why should Democrats meet with Judge Kavanaugh?   After all, I think we ALL know how they’re ALL going to vote.  And if Democrats choose to blow off meetings, we would get to the confirmation process all that much quicker. And along the way we’ll make note of those Democrat Senators who chose to abandon their Constitutional obligation for no other reason than partisan politics.  Sharpton is a flipping genius. You can tell by the way he talks.

And if you think the Democrats are coming apart at the seams now just wait and see what happens should Justice Ginsburg retire or die.  After all, she is 85 not in the best of health, and Trump stands a very good chance, as of at least right now, of being president until 2024. Imagine if President Trump were able to obtaining a 6-3 center-right profile on the court, it would literally DESTROY the leftist agenda and the Democrat Party for an entire generation.  And that’s what so terrifies Schumer & Co.

And this conservative windfall would be directly traceable to Barry ‘O’.  The Democrats were sure his election had proven once and for all that radicalism had finally been mainstreamed, so they luxuriated in their Obamagasm.  But they were sadly mistaken in that they didn’t realize, or simply chose to ignore, the fact that Barry ‘O’ was little more than an empty suit; he had an appealing persona, but his ideologies and policies were complete CRAP and he was incredibly stupid.

Not only that, Barry demonstrated time and time again he was simply in way over his head and clearly lacked the necessary skill set to be president.  That said, he was still able to achieve some level of success in his effort to “fundamentally transform” America which resulted in what was undeniable, catastrophic failure and proved to people that socialism was a disaster.  And it was the resulting backlash that brought about first the Tea Party movement and then the election of President Trump.

How is it that these Democrat Senators can be considered as being, in any way, legitimate servants of the people if they refuse to do their Constitutional duty every time they disagree politically?  Do they really think we are too stupid to notice their staggering arrogance, in that they willingly bend the rules in their favor when they’re in power, but somehow now that the Republicans are in power they should go against their own interests and surrender to the Democrats’ ludicrous demands, for no reason?

So let them be derelict in their duty. They’re simply capitulating to the crazies within their party and making it all that much easier for the Republicans to succeed in this confirmation.  And succeed in general, as has been happening pretty routinely during the Trump presidency.  ‘Three cheers’ for the Democrats’ political suicide!  Stalling is what progressives do. They have no solutions and have not fixed one problem in decades. One reason the left despises Trump is that he is a doer.  And he is a leader.

And finally in getting back to Sharpton, he’s someone who has always fancied himself a powerful civil rights leader much like Martin Luther King.  But just like with everything good and legitimate in this world, there are always cheap knock offs and fakes that try and trick people into believing that they’re the real thing. Sharpton is nothing more than the cheapest of knock offs of the real thing, and he someone who has done more to set race relations back than perhaps even Jesse Jackson.

Advertisements

ANOTHER LEFTIST WHO HAS PRESIDENT TRUMP CONFUSED WITH OBAMA…

dyson

I swear, the number of kooks who call the Democrat Party home seems to be growing exponentially. And the more they come the more they insist upon applying ALL of the many ‘character’ flaws possessed by Barry ‘O’, onto President Trump.  And so it was, yet again, that entering from stage left we had another leftwing nut who, if we didn’t know he was speaking about President Trump we would have surly thought that he was speaking about Barry ‘O’.  And of course the leftwing nut of whom I speak is that well-known racist kook, author and radio host Michael Eric Dyson.

You see, it was during this past Wednesday’s episode of ‘Hardball’, on MSNBC, that the esteemed Mr. Dyson, chose to make what was really nothing more than one of his very typical, and patently idiotic, accusations in referring to President Trump as our “bigot in chief” who “unleashed” horrendous viewpoints, like actress Roseanne Barr’s racist remark about former Barry ‘O’ adviser Valerie Jarrett.  Now personally, it’s every time I hear the phrase “bigot in chief” that the first person who immediately comes to mind is, Barry ‘O’.  Because he was, and remains to this day, a bigot.

Anyway, the very racist Mr. Dyson said, “We’ve got a bigot-in-chief and racist in residence. That is what it is. He has unleashed some of the most horrendous viewpoints in this country. He said ‘look, it’s okay, come out of the closet, stand up and speak and tell the world what you believe and you will be defended by political bluster.’ And notice in his tweet, he said nothing about the horrendous statement that Roseanne Barr herself admitted was unforgivable. He said nothing about that.”  I’m curious, what was it that the president was expected to say, exactly?

And then this moron went on to add, “He wants to have it both ways. He wants to certify and validate the quiet bigots afraid to stand up and speak out, and at the same time, he wants to get at the other side for its bigotry and for its dumping on him.”  Dyson is hilarious with his stringing together of words which, I can only assume, he must think makes him appear to be more intelligent when in fact all he really ends up accomplishing is the leaving of very little doubt that he one’s of the dumbest boobs you’ll ever meet.  That and the fact he’s a committed racist!

Those on the left, of which Dyson is the prefect example, insist upon hurling labels like racist, white supremacist, Nazi and bigot all in their effort to create the justification for their calling for white genocide.  But if they were ever to succeed in that endeavor, who is it that would then be forced to cover the cost of their welfare?  Would they suddenly develop a desire to go to work?  NO!  So what would happen if the race that produces, educates, innovates and keeps this country operating were to be done away with?  And have they even thought about that?

Comments like Dyson’s get the like-minded all excited, and they’re happy to hear such language.  Hardcore leftists will always vote Democrat, so it really doesn’t matter if they’re happy or sad.  However, this sort of toxic hate, drives reasonable people away, those middle-of-the-road folks who have voted Democrat in the past.  So please, keep spewing hate, leftists. You’re doing President Trump, and his supporters a huge favor.  Those “I say it, so that makes it true” loons have torqued themselves into overdrive, to the point where they may soon simply implode.

Folks like this Dyson character still believe that they can spew whatever hate-filled drivel they like without needing any evidence to back up what they say, or being made to suffer any consequences when their accusations are shown to be false.  And it’s a growing number of us who are now very angry, angry enough to flock to the ballot box and make certain that these infantile clowns are prevented from being able to elect those who possess their same hate-filled views.  And the longer they keep this up, the sooner they will find themselves in the landfill of history.

And I’m curious how it is that President Trump is in any way responsible for what Roseanne Barr said?   It would seem to me that he has got far more important things to deal with such as cleaning up the substantial mess left behind by that misfit we had in office for eight long years.  It was Barry ‘O’ who caused the chasm between the races. Trump has helped American blacks. Witness the lowest unemployment in decades that blacks are experiencing.   It’s the Democrats who fill the airwaves with vile and hateful attacks on anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

And considering how divisive, and downright racist, Barry ‘O’ was for those eight years, the conservatives and Independents, despite all of their criticisms, were rather cool and collected, awaiting their chance at the polls.  Yet when Trump wins suddenly leftist comedians were pulling out severed heads, there has been talk of assassination, the open cursing of him and his wife on talk shows, concocted Russian collusion and demand for impeachment with no offense being committed.  No, it was Barry ‘O’ who ginned up his base into a bunch of raving violent lunatics.

And it was also Barry who incited ‘Black Lives Matter’, and actually encouraged members of this group to threaten all manner of violence against the police.  And it was also Barry who went about the spying on civilians and who used the IRS to attack his political opponents.  No, Trump hasn’t unleashed bad people, he has merely brought out the true colors of those on the unhinged left.  And when Dyson speaks of Trumps “horrendous viewpoints”, what is it that seems to have not only his panties, but the panties of so many others on the left, in such a twist?

Well they would seem to include, but not be limited to, the following:

President Trump believes in our Constitution, he believes in sovereign America with real borders, he believes in God and not the Religion of Liberalism, he believes in merit based LEGAL Immigration and loves those Immigrants. He loves the Jewish people and has some in his family, he believes America should have a strong military to protect herself, he believes in the police, military, Border Patrol, hard-working middle class, he believes in lower taxes and keeping jobs at home and he believes in small and large business without the burden of heavy regulatory barriers.

And we also now have a president who believes in just and even trade between nations, he believes in a babies right in the womb not to be murdered and then have its baby parts sold on the open market, he believes in free choices for choosing your schools and that they should teach and not ‘Indoctrinate’, he believes in real reporting of news that is not fake new like those in our state-controlled media is, he believes in standing for the National Anthem and showing respect for America, even if you are a overpaid celebrity be it (Sports or Hollyweird) without significance.

And while I could likely go on for several pages, suffice it to say that we now have a real President who is not bought and paid for by those in the ‘Establishment’, as was Hitlery, and who has still managed to keep a good many of his promises and accomplished much to the complete horror of those in the state-controlled media, the Democrat Party, the many RINO’s and NeverTrumper’s, racists like Dyson, and the rest of our enemies, both  foreign and domestic, who hate this president for wanting to ‘Make America Great Again!’  Keep up the good work, Mr. President.

WHEN IS AN ‘INFORMANT’ NOT A ‘SPY’???

957

The answer to that, according to those in the media, is whenever the so-called ‘informant’ is involved in ‘spying’ on the campaign of a Republican candidate.  Because whenever an ‘informant’ is found anywhere near a Democrat candidate’s campaign they are always called a ‘spy.’   So if you’re all a bit confused when it comes to the ongoing investigation in Russia’s impact on our 2016 election, and the role that the Trump campaign, the intelligence community, and Hitlery’s campaign may have had in what was happening, don’t worry you’ve got lots of company.

And the reason for so much confusion regarding this entire informant/spy issue has to do with the fact that our state-controlled media has done a rather amazing job blaming President Trump for muddying the waters, when in fact it’s actually been those involved with the media itself that have been attempting, and succeeding, to confuse everyone.  For example, it was two of this nation’s more prominent propaganda machines, the Washington Post and the New York Times, that originally broke the stories that revealed that there was a ‘spy’ in the Trump campaign.

However, It was just a few day lather that if you were to read either of these same rags you would have been told that President Trump is lying and that there never was a ‘spy’ in the campaign!  Instead, what there was… was a “confidential informant.”   See, there was this guy who was gathering information on the campaign and the people in the campaign, then surreptitiously handing all of that information over to the FBI who were secretly investigating that campaign.  Now, sure, most of us would call this spying… but those in the media tell us that it’s not really spying.

So this is how low those in the state-controlled media have now sunk and it’s the folks there at the Communist News Network, aka (CNN),that would like us all to know that the President is a liar for saying that the government was spying on his campaign… even though the government was spying on his campaign.   First there was that moron, Don Lemon, explaining why there was no spy, even though there was, and then that bigger moron, Jake Tapper, calling the President a liar, even though he’s not lying about this.  And yet these boobs call themselves journalist?

Thankfully, there are still some pundits out there willing to be intellectually honest. Mollie Hemingway recently appeared on Fox News where she went toe-to-toe with a Washington Post reporter who had the devil of a time explaining why her paper would reveal the fact that there was a spy in the campaign, before then arguing that there was no spy.  Hemingway blasted the media, the intelligence community , and even RINO Senator Marco Rubio while explaining the hypocrisy that was self-evident in the ongoing Russia investigation and the coverage surrounding it.

Hemingway said, “Maybe Republican vs. Democrat isn’t the best way to view this, so much as the establishment vs. outsider. And Marco Rubio apparently is unaware that the FBI opened an investigation into the Trump campaign, he says there is no investigation into the Trump campaign — that is not a secret. They opened an investigation during the campaign, and what we have learned in the last week from reporting in the Washington Post and New York Times is that this investigation involved far more surveillance than we ever had any idea about.”

And she went on to say, “ It wasn’t just a wiretap against a campaign aide that was able to wear a wiretap… it was also national security letters, which are secret subpoenas, and we know of at least one informant, someone secretly gathering information on the Trump campaign. We are supposedly not allowed to call that a spy, but in the normal world people call that spying, but whatever it is, it is unprecedented, and the lack of journalistic curiosity about what was going on, how this happened, and whether protocol was followed is frankly scandalous.”

Hemingway, of course, is 100% correct, and the media hacks at CNN and nearly everywhere else out there in the wild, wacky world of our state-controlled media complex, should be ashamed of the way they’ve ‘covered’ the ongoing investigation.  But they’re not.  Instead they all seem to be rather proud of the job they’re doing.  Hence we have one more example on what has become a very, very long list of many examples of why fewer and fewer Americans feel that they can trust those in the media to be telling the truth, and it’s even fewer that trust CNN.

When those in the media can no longer be trusted to tell the truth, what purpose is it that they serve?  Trust and credibility were once the watchwords of those in media.  But no more!  There no longer seems to be even the slightest interest by those who were once referred to as the watch dogs of our democracy to verify the ‘facts’ of a story.  So slowly, over time, people stop listening.  And it’s those in the media that are doing the people, as well as themselves, a grave disservice, because there will come a time when the people should have been listening, but weren’t.

ERIC HOLDER ACCUSES PRESIDENT TRUMP OF NOT BELIEVING IN THE RULE OF LAW???

Holder 1

Have you ever noticed, and I’m sure you have, that whenever confronted with any of the many inconvenient truths regarding themselves and/or their rather checkered past, Democrats simply rewrite any history of their involvement in such unsavory acts as slavery, segregation or the allowing into our country all manner of individuals who have no business here so as to make it appear that that involvement never really took place.  And the degree to which they have been successful in having done so is legendary, and rarely are Democrats challenged regarding their version of history.

Which brings to Tuesday’s thrilling broadcast of MSNBC’s “All In,” during which ex-Attorney General Eric Holder accused President Trump of not believing in the rule of law and for taking what Holder said is a “situational” approach where he wants to treat his supporters better than everyone else.  Now to me the man he is describing sounds much more like Holder’s old boss than our current president, but maybe that’s just me.  Holder himself has quite the reputation for being someone who is not a big supporter of the rule of law.  His tenure as AG is full of examples of just that.

Holder said the president “believes in situational law and order. And there is no way that I think you can resolve the tension that you have you just described [Trump’s comments on former White House staffer Rob Porter and the Cohen raid, compared with his stances on executing drug dealers and immigration]. He is not a believer in, at base, in the rule of law. He wants to make sure that those people who he likes, the people who support him are treated in one way, and those other people, whoever those other people are, are treated in a different way.”

Holder is such a kidder.  After all, here we have a guy who ran guns to the drug cartels, who then lied to Congress about it, and who remains complicit in the murders of two U.S. law enforcement agents, and hundreds of Mexican citizens.  And now he’s helping leftists in California break federal immigration law.  He should be in prison, not mouthing off about anyone else’s respect for the rule of law.  But this is the modus operandi for scum like Holder, accuse others of what you are guilty of to make yourself appear innocent while discrediting your ‘enemy’ at the same time.

Look, I think we all recognize the fact that laws are routinely broken by Democrats, especially if doing so gets them what they want.  But, shame on anyone else who doesn’t follow the law to the letter!  Democrats use the law to get power over others and to hurt people, not by inflicting pain but by placing burdens of people that do nothing but restrict our freedoms.  Laws are never obeyed by Democrats if doing so, prevents them from meeting the objectives they have set for themselves.  Democrats require societal chaos and consequences of it in order to advance their agenda.

Holder should have been in prison when he and his Communist comrades, the Black Panthers, took over a government military building at Colombia University at gun point in the 1980’s and held it for three days.  He should have been thrown in prison again when he and his buddy Barry ‘O’ came up with a scheme to sell guns to the drug cartels and then blamed the hundreds of killings in Mexico committed with those same guns on American gun shows and gun shops and screamed for more gun control. He and Barry both should be in prison for those murders they caused in Mexico.

Like so many on the left, and more than a few on the right as well, Holder is projecting. Hitlery has skated for decades when it comes to the many crimes that she has committed. And Holder is just as bad.  Fast and Furious was his creation that allowed thousands of weapons to end up in the hands of drug lords, and used to kill border agents. That’s nothing short of treason. Justice would be seeing, live on your television screen, Holder being perp walked, out of a federal courthouse near you in chains followed closely behind by Hitlery, as well as Barry ‘O’ himself.

And let’s not forget that this was the guy responsible for the slap-on-the-wrist to those involved in the Black Panther voter harassment case, because the victims were white, and, the defendants, black.  Holder himself testified to Congress that he didn’t think the conduct of the black militants who dressed in military garb and brandished truncheons outside a polling place was as bad as what blacks experienced during the Civil Rights era, so, in his mind, full penalties and enforcement of federal voting rights law wasn’t warranted in the case.  Following the rule of law?

So, Holder basically admitted, and in live testimony no less, that his personal standard for enforcing federal civil rights law was whether the conduct complained-of rose to a level similar to what blacks experienced in the 1960’s and 1970’s.  Holder is a vile hypocrite of the very worst kind. He has no credibility whatsoever when it comes to having a rational, and serious, discussion regarding race-neutral federal law enforcement.  Because he is black his view is that blacks can do no wrong as long as whatever is being perpetrated is being perpetrated against whites.  Pretty pathetic.

TURNS OUT TAVIS SMILEY MIGHT BE ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE SERIAL PERVERTS…

Smiley 3

Well, well, well, what do we have here?  Yet another racist punk turns out to be a racist, and a serial, pervert as well.  And thus we have another race baiting holier-than-thou, POS going down in flames.  I know, right?  And of course it is he of whom I speak that is none other than that well-known race-baiter, Tavis Smiley, whose longtime talk show, subsidized by your tax dollars, on PBS has now been ‘suspended’ over what were called “troubling allegations” regarding Smiley’s penchant for sexually harassing staffers, and retaliating against those who refused his manliness.

Smiley has a long history of being racist.  And while he has stated that the first black president did very little to help those in the black community, he always had a number of excuses at the ready for why that was.  And it was after receiving several allegations that he had engaged in sexual relationships with subordinates, and created a hostile work environment, PBS reached out to a law firm to investigate the claims. A PBS spokesperson told the Daily News, “The inquiry uncovered multiple, credible allegations of conduct that is inconsistent with the values and standards of PBS.”

While the spokesperson declined to go into great detail regarding the complaints, sources told Variety that Smiley would use his position as one of the networks longest-serving talk show hosts, to entice his subordinates into having sex with him.  According to Variety, some witnesses even said they felt like the status of their employment hinged on their sexual relationship with Smiley.  Other complaints against Smiley included verbal abuse, as well as threats and retaliation against any who complained.  After all, how dare anyone refuse a studly specimen like Tavis.

According to Variety:  In a February piece in the Observer, Jacques Hyzagi, a former producer on Smiley’s television show, wrote that Smiley’s “misogyny is always creeping around, barely camouflaged by Midwestern good manners.” Hyzagi described Smiley picking up a woman at the Orlando airport and bringing her along on a reporting trip as a “f*ck buddy”: alleged that Smiley had a romantic relationship with another producer; and quoted Smiley denigrating PBS executives.  Smiley has made his political leaning, his racial biases, well-known in his ten-plus years at PBS.

It was on Smiley’s show in May of 2015, that Susan Sarandon blamed America’s homeless problem on former President Ronald Reagan, a position that Smiley appeared to agree with.  On November of 2017, Smiley and Vagina Monologues creator Eve Ensler wondered why so many women voted for President Trump, given his alleged history of harassing women.  Eventually, the two decided that women who voted for Trump were “self-loathing.”  And he’s also had guests on his show to debate such worthwhile topics as “white rage” and “white nationalism” in the age of Trump.

I’ve always been a big believer in that old adage, “What goes around, comes around.”  I’ve simply seen it play out too many times not to be a believer.  And never could there be a more worthy recipient of it than this twit, Smiley.  I’m sure most have observed Smiley’s denigrating of first, candidate, and now President, Trump.  This pompous sanctimonious hypocrite had no end of viscous personal attacks, using the megaphone provided by his show, while at the same time employing those considered to be the typical batch of sycophantic guests gleefully aping his viewpoints.

So here we have another liberal media type apparently biting the dust!  Liberals are the most perverted bunch of people on the planet!  Why have our tax dollars EVER been used to subsidize the extreme hate-whitey racist leftists like Smiley?  He’s always been a transparent phony-baloney.  He tries to drape himself in this pseudo-intellectual framework, complete with his stylized speech patterns and fake eyebrow contortions. And I must say that is better than hearing how Charlie Rose, the other PBS douchebag, recently got kicked to the curb. What a way to end the year!

Smiley oftentimes seemed to be seething with a rage that he was barely able to control. I think he has used it throughout his career to intimidate and manipulate the people around him, whether they be co-workers or guests on his program with whom he disagreed.  These allegations come as no surprise and seem to be about the only mechanism for changing the programming at both PBS and NPR, death or removal by sexual harassment. I swear there’s been little or no change in the programming of these government-sponsored propaganda outlets, or their hosts, for years.

And it was in responding to these accusations, as well as the decision to suspend his show, that on Wednesday night Smiley took to Facebook posting a video and statement in which he claims that he has “never groped, coerced, or exposed myself inappropriately to any workplace colleague in my entire broadcast career, covering 6 networks over 30 years.”  He wrote, “If having a consensual relationship with a colleague years ago is the stuff that leads to this kind of public humiliation and personal destruction, heaven help us.”  Yup, it’s Smiley who’s the REAL victim here.

Anyway, Smiley went on to add, “PBS overreacted and conducted a biased and sloppy investigation, which led to a rush to judgment, and trampling on a reputation that I have spent an entire lifetime trying to establish.”  I guess the only thing left now is for him to accuse PBS of basing their decision to suspend him on nothing other than racism.  I mean, isn’t that ALWAYS the first response from blacks who feel that they have somehow been treated unfairly.  That this is only now happening to him because he’s black?  I’m sure that’s coming.  It’s really only a matter of time.

Now it occurs to me that those on the left seem to now be operating what is nothing more than a modern day secular version of the Inquisition, carried out during the middle ages and the aim of which was to combat heresy, by publicly pillorying those equipped with a penis who “they” have determined do not adequately worship, or hold in sufficient reverence, the female of the species.  Charges are laid, no defense is permitted, and public humiliation and destruction of the accused’s livelihood is automatic.  In their basic function, all inquisitions operate pretty much alike.

And even with all that said, had old Tavis tended to be just a bit less racist in his opinions and had he demonstrated just a bit more genuine concern for those in the black community, I might feel a little sorry for him.  Instead, he’s really nothing more than just another black mouthpiece for the Democrat Party, and someone willing to use his fellow blacks as way of making himself a lot of money and gaining for himself more than a little notoriety.  The only person that Smiley truly cares about is, Smiley.  So like I said, all we’re seeing here is another example of what goes around…

THE DEMISE OF LATE NIGHT TELEVISION…

Kimmel

I’ve never been one for late night television.  At least since the days, and I may be showing my age here, of Johnny Carson.  And with the arrival of Leno I watched a little less, and I did watch a little Letterman in his early days.  And with those who have now assumed the helm of late night, it’s become no longer worth my time.  Regardless of which of these knuckleheads, Fallon, Colbert, Meyers or O’Brien, we may be talking about, there seems to be not a dime’s worth of difference between any of these supposed late night comics.  They all seem to have forgotten what it was that brought folks back night after night to watch Carson.  They’ve forgotten that it’s supposed to be about being funny, not gross, rude, inappropriate, or political to the extreme.  Which brings me to he who can very easily be considered the ‘Poster Child’ for this the latest batch of imbecilic late night TV hosts, Jimmy Kimmel.

And to see why it is that I say that we need look back no further than Kimmel’s politically inspired diatribe from this past Monday night when we were supposed to believe that Kimmel was actually moved to tears over the recent Las Vegas attack.  It was during what he described as being his opening monologue that Kimmel set about pushing for more gun control before proceeding to bad-mouth Republicans.  But he said not a word about the number of innocents gunned down in Chicago each and every month.  Knowing as we do what his political affiliation is we shouldn’t have been surprised.  But that said, Kimmel was right to lament the “59 innocent” who are dead as result of the Las Vegas attack, but as is usually the case with these celebrity zealots from the left they are rather selective when it comes to those issues that they choose to highlight and then go on a rampage about.

Because nowhere in Kimmel’s diatribe/monologue was there any lamentations for the more than 63 individuals who were killed on average every single month in Chicago during 2016 (the Chicago Tribune reported a total of 762 murders for 2016).  Nor was there any mention of the nearly 4,400 victims who were shot and wounded during 2016.  But Kimmel, as someone who is likely constantly surrounded by his own well-armed security team, actually suggested that Republicans ought to be ashamed of themselves for not passing more gun control now.  Chicago is a tough one for those on the left because all manner of gun control imaginable has been tried, including an all-out ban on handguns — so Chicago is actually a case study in the ineffectiveness of gun control; an example of how murder numbers rise when strict gun control laws are in place.  So what they do is to pretend that it simply doesn’t exist.

Kimmel responded to critics on Tuesday, essentially blaming them for “the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want.”  And it was in making such a ludicrous statement that Kimmel accomplished little more then to make quite clear, to anyone who might have happened to tune in, just how ignorant of the facts he truly is.  He began by saying, “I want to send special good wishes to those watching from Las Vegas, where you know what happened on Sunday night. I’m not gonna get deep into it again, I said what I had to say last night.”  He then went on to say, “But I do want to say something to these nuts who spent most of the day today on television and online attacking those of us who think we need to do something about the fact that 59 innocent people were killed.”  He said, “They say it’s inappropriate to be talking about it because it’s too soon.”

And it was then that he went on to add, “Well maybe it’s too soon for you, because deep down inside in your heart, you know you bear some responsibility for the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want, and now you want to cover yourself until the storm of outrage passes, and you can go back to your dirty business as usual.”  And he concluded his idiotic rant by saying, “But it’s not too soon for us.”  And added, “because we’re Americans, and the last time I checked, the First Amendment is at least as important as the Second Amendment, so we will talk about it, and shame on you for suggesting we do otherwise.”  So what makes this turd, who has a team of ‘writers’ writing his material for him and who, apparently, has Chuckie Schumer as a consultant, think we’re ok with being lectured to?  Maybe before he starts shooting mouth off he should search out the facts.

And yet, Kimmel offered nothing in the way of an apology for his deception during his Tuesday night ‘monologue’, nor did he rectify his failure to ‘cry’ over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — 536 so far this year — the way he ‘cried’ over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada.  Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it.  By Kimmel’s logic, those who are opposed to the Second Amendment can be said to share responsibility for the mass slaughters by governments of their own citizens.  This collectivism is one of the dangers of the socialist ideology.  A collective is a group.  Socialists want people in groups.  They identify their supporters in groups and then they group and attack their opponents in the same way.  They create and continue their division through this collectivist ideology.

But let’s face it, Kimmel is only doing what his masters tell him to do.  He’s virtue signaling like all get out.  His ‘crocodile tears’ are as phony as his acting.  Of course he’s going to politicize this tragedy.  His does the same with healthcare and his constant attacking of Republicans.  He’s nothing more than a partisan hack doing the Democrats’ dirty work.  His ‘tears’ and ‘heartfelt feelings’ on the tragedy in Las Vegas are all fake…just like him.  Of course he’s not going to shed any tears of concern for the people in Chicago getting shot and killed every month there.  He doesn’t care.  He didn’t get the script with the talking points all laid out for him to speak.  He has cues to learn, you know.  He would never bring what happens in Chicago up because guess who controls that city, and nearly every other big city, the Democrats.  It would make them look bad.  So it all has to be against the Republicans, all the time.

While this recent shooting was indeed a tragedy, I think we need to keep in mind that it’s on average that there are 96 deaths per day in America resulting from auto crashes.  And are those deaths any less tragic?  And where’s Kimmel’s outrage over CAFE standards?  Or for the 91 Americans who die every day from an opioid overdose.  Excessive drinking kills 1 in 10 Americans.  About 1 in 8 Americans, and Kimmel may be one himself, are considered alcoholics.  The top causes of death in America are Heart disease 633,842, Cancer 595,930, chronic lower respiratory diseases 155,041, Accidents 146,571, Stroke 140,323, Alzheimer’s disease 110,561, Diabetes 79,535, Influenza and pneumonia 57,062.  With all the planning and horror the shooter inflicted upon an innocent crowd of 20,000 the numbers reveal 99.7% of them escaped alive and it’s no small measure the miracle that is.

With the radical liberals in Congress and Hollyweird saying that all country western fans are Republican gun nuts and making their insane comments can we also assume then that the shooter was a Democrat or a Hitlery supporter.  Because in nearly every violent act, shooting related or otherwise, the perpetrator is nearly ALWAYS some nut from the Left.  The Left and their ilk are responsible for nearly all major acts of violence in the world.  They always dismiss the actual murderers who identify with them, and immediately blame anyone and everyone else who are not on the Left.  Calling them out on their playbook, showing others their instant response is always to defend the criminal or terrorist murderers by providing the cover of blaming everyone else.  Be that the NRA or the Second Amendment.  Maybe what we need to place a limit on is Liberals being able to buy a gun.

The people that are shot in Chicago, and in every other major, Democrat controlled city, are willingly sacrificed by those on the left because it allows them to generate higher gun violence numbers in the U.S. which they can then use to justify the need for more, and far stricter, gun laws.  That is why they tend not to prosecute the criminals to the fullest extent of the law.  And yet where’s the outrage from Kimmel about that?  There is none.  Because to point that out would be seen as breaking ranks.  This is simply selective outrage of the left on parade.   Kimmel has blood on his hands, he is one of the alt left fascists acting as a megaphone for people like Hitlery, Bernie and failed ex-president Obummer. Helping them get out their calls for violence against President Trump and his supporters.  Encouraging alt left fascist violence with a chuckle and a nod.  Well, you leftists got your wish.

The sad truth is that Democrats care far more about their agenda than they do about the people who foolishly vote for them.  But that seems to bother folks like Kimmel very little.  Kimmel, still isn’t being honest with America.  And he seems to have no problem whatsoever when it comes to spewing his dishonest drivel whether he’s talking about healthcare or gun control.  He seems only too willing to intentionally mislead people by failing to disclose, for example, how he had been prepped for months by Chuckie Schumer regarding his recent rant on yet another Republican attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare.  He kept that all very well hidden because had he divulged that information, he would have been discredited as being nothing more than partisan political hack.  Not that many of those who tune in to watch his antics every night would care one way or the other.  They’re as sick as he is.

RUTH ‘BUZZY’ GINSBURG, “SEXISM IS WHY HITLERY LOST.”

845

Democrats/Liberals/progressives/socialists, or whatever moniker they wish to go by these days, it’s those on the left who really do live in what can only be described as being a constant state of denial.  Because it’s whenever they lose any sort of contest that it must always be because either someone cheated or those responsible for electing, or selecting, the winner were somehow biased against them.  It can never be because they were a poor candidate or a contestant lacking the necessary talent to actually win.  Such is the case with Hitlery, who over the course of the last 10 months has blamed everyone, and everything, imaginable for losing a contest that nearly all but her opponent thought that she had in the bag.  Everyone but herself, that is.

And it has been 99 percent of those involved in the state-controlled media who have been doing their best to bolster her claims that she was somehow robbed of her much deserved victory by Donald Trump.  Because there is simply no way that he could have possibly won without cheating.  And now joining in the blame-everything-but-Hitlery-game is none other than Supreme Court Justice ‘Ruth Buzzy’ Ginsburg, who believes sexism is what really put President Trump in the White House.  It was when asked by the Communist Broadcasting System’s (CBS) Charlie Rose in an interview conducted earlier this week that she said, “I have no doubt that it did.”  Old ‘Buzzy’ went on to add that sexism “was a major, major factor” in Hitlery’s devastating loss last year.

Now for those able to remember, old ‘Buzzy’ made no such comments back in 2008 when it was Obummer who handily defeated Hitlery, ruining her historic moment of becoming the first female U.S. president.  But then, perhaps that has much more to do with ‘Buzzy’s’ personal feelings toward President Trump.  After all, she was one of the harsher critics of then candidate Trump, going so far as to once tell The New York Times that she couldn’t imagine him as president and the negative affects he would have on the country.  ‘Buzzy’ said it would only be four years for the country but for the Supreme Court, “It could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”  Now she has since apologized for those comments, so that makes it alright.

The Democrats remind me of an old soap opera. They use the same plot in every show and continue to get away with their bad acting.  Can you imagine the Democrats if they were unable to use the ‘blame game?’  If they weren’t protected by the state-controlled media and were instead made to abide by the same rules they impose on everyone else?  Can you imagine the Democrats if they always had to make very clear what it is that they truly do stand for?  Imagine if the Democrats we held accountable to the same regulations that they impose upon their enemies, we the American people. They’d never win another election.  They continue to thrive only because their supporters are comprised of some of the most ignorant people on the planet.

And when it comes to old ‘Buzzy’, she’s the type of individual that Liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans love to first nominate and then expend every effort to get them quickly confirmed.  And they do this because they know these people are far less interested in determining the constitutionality of any law than they are in dreaming up new ways to ‘interpret’ what the Constitution says.  It’s called judicial activism.  Old ‘Buzzy’ has proven time and time again that she has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.  Her opinions as a Justice are extreme.  At least she was truthful when saying many women voted for Hitlery because Hitlery said vote for me if you are a woman because I am a woman.  If that doesn’t define ‘sexism’, what does?

Let’s face it, had Hitlery not been a woman, she would have never received her party’s nomination in the first place.  And she lost the election not because Trump cheated, but because people saw how she had received preferential treatment and was let off the hook for the minimum of 58 felonies that she committed, but wasn’t prosecuted for, not to mention her ‘Pay to play’ with the Clinton foundation.  I mean, how else does someone who’s ‘serving’ our nation end up with $200 Million, plus, fortune on a $186,000 a year salary?  Or was it her consistently horrible performance first as a U.S. Senator and then as Secretary of State, her extreme progressive views, specifically in relation to the promises she made regarding the Supreme Court?

Far from deserving to be in the White House, or allowed to remain free to go across the country on a book tour where she charges folks $300 a pop just to sign her book, Hitlery should instead be serving a life sentence in Leavenworth.  ‘Buzzy’ yet again shows her own bias in failing to see that Hitlery’s behavior has been abhorrent and is what resulted in many voters coming to see her as being profoundly untrustworthy and therefore not worthy of their vote.  That’s why she lost.  And yet Ginsburg can blame, and with what I can only guess is her version of a straight face, Hitlery’s defeat on ‘sexism.’  Which says much more about her mind than it does about any actual events or circumstances surrounding our most recent presidential election.

Look, we all know that Obummer won the presidency with more than 95% of blacks voting for him instead of the white guys, McCain or Romney, then men who ran against him.  So could we possibly expect to hear from old ‘Buzzy’ how it was that the only reason Obummer was able to win either election was because of racism?  Somehow I doubt it.  And you know, since when does simply by virtue of you being a female, erase the fact that you are nothing more than a cheating, lying, criminal politician and grifter?  Hitlery was rejected because everyone who possess a vagina failed to vote for her because she has a vagina.  Vaginas do not create anything notable concerning ones character.  And Hitlery is evidence of that fact.

But in a way, I guess you could say that old ‘Buzzy’ is correct when she says that sexism played a major role in our last election.  But that would only be because the Democrats were desperate in their attempt to elect a president based solely on the gender of their candidate and not on any specific qualifications that she can be said to have possessed.  And they promoted the kind of agenda that women able to think for themselves, and who didn’t want to vote for Hitlery, would never support.  And then Democrats said those women were stupid and unintelligent.  Yup, that’s sexism alright.   Good thing many women didn’t buy into that crap and helped to elect a real president, one who represents all of us not just one of the many ‘victim’ groups.