I’ve never been able to quite figure out why, when it comes to politics, anyone would want to be taking their cues from those morons, past or present, whose only claim to fame is that they host, or have hosted, a late night television show.  Once upon a time, a very long time ago, I did on occasion like to tune into watch Letterman.  But as time went on it was somewhere along the way that his need to lecture us regarding our politics seemed to take over and he became much less enjoyable to watch.  To the point that when he finally retired I never really watched him at all.  He had become more than a little boring.  Politics wasn’t then, just as it still isn’t, why I would watch any of these late night losers.  They are all left leaning losers with whom I have absolutely no interest in watching.

And so it was that recently Letterman chose to resurface, coming out of hibernation to in order to slam President Trump and various members of his administration in a lengthy ‘interview’ with New York magazine, explaining that he’d still love to interview the real estate mogul-turned-president one final time.  And according to Letterman, today’s late-night shows have an “obligation” to challenge the president, and described how he would interview Trump if he could get one final shot at him.  He said, “I would just start with a list. ‘You did this. You did that. Don’t you feel stupid for having done that, Don? And who’s this goon Steve Bannon, and why do you want a white supremacist as one of your advisers? Come on, Don, we both know you’re lying. Now, stop it.’”

Now I may be wrong, but I don’t recall ever hearing about how Dave interviewed Barry in such a disrespectful manner.  I don’t recall Dave saying, “Hey Barry, what’s it like having as your vice President a pervert who enjoys skinny dipping in front of female Secret Service personnel?”  Or asking, “Barry, did you really think that whole ‘Fast and Furious’ gun running scheme was a good idea?”   Or how he could have said to Barry, “Man, I thought it was a work of genius to use the IRS to go after those scumbag conservative groups!”  Nor did he ask, “Do you ever have any second thoughts about giving all that taxpayer money to Solyndra?”  I mean the number of questions he could have asked Barry “Almighty” goes on and on but, strangely enough, Dave never bothered asking any of them.

So anyway, what follows are but a few excerpts from New York‘s interview with Dave:

On his previous interviews with Trump, before he announced for the presidency, Letterman said, “He was a joke of a wealthy guy. We didn’t take him seriously. He’d sit down, and I would just start making fun of him. He never had any retort. He was big and doughy, and you could beat him up. He seemed to have a good time, and the audience loved it, and that was Donald Trump. Beyond that, I remember a friend in the PR business told me that he knew for a fact — this was three or four presidential campaigns ago — that Donald Trump would never run for president; he was just monkeying around for the publicity. So I assumed that was the story and now it turns out he’s the president.”  Funny, he was never that disrespectful when it came to Barry “Almighty”.

And on Trump’s Cabinet and advisers, he said, “It’s delightful. Kellyanne Conway was my favorite for a long time. This thing about her telling everyone, ‘Go buy Ivanka’s shoes; I’m going to go buy Ivanka’s shoes. Hell, I’ll buy you a pair of Ivanka’s shoes.’ Then they had to counsel her. Boy, if this administration decides you need counseling — whoa. And poor Sean Spicer is a boob who just got out of a cab and now here he is. Then the other kid, is it Miller?”  He said, “[Stephen Miller.] Wow, that guy is creepy. He fell out of a truck. And the guy from Exxon, Rex Tillerson. Don would say, “Rex, if you’re talking to your friends, ask them” — I’m sure the Russians groomed Trump. They gave him tips: “You want to be an authoritarian dictator? Sure, that’s not a problem. We’ll tell you how to do it, for God’s sake.”

It was on Trump’s dust-up with Rep. John Lewis that Letterman also ad an opinion.  He said, “Holy God. First of all, because I’m always thinking about myself, I think, I was about John Lewis’s age when he marched across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Would I have had the guts to do that? The all-talk John Lewis goes down there and gets a goddamned skull fracture. I mean, Trumpy will never have to worry about a skull fracture because of the hair. Thank you! How do you know if Donald Trump is lying? His lips are moving. Thank you! But in addition to every other thing that’s wrong with the Trump, he’s ignorant in a way that’s insulting to the office, insulting to America, insulting to human rights, insulting to civil rights, insulting to John Lewis. Trump saying that broke my heart.”

Look, I just remember the tantrum that Letterman pitched when Leno got the ‘Tonight Show’ job and he didn’t.  What a crybaby!  Maybe that’s what made old Dave snap, I’m not sure.  But the proof was in the pudding because it was only a handful of times, over the years, that he never topped Leno in the ratings.  But to tell you the truth I never thought Leno was all that funny either, he was a bit less obvious about his politics, however, which did make it a bit easier to watch him.  But none of these late night ‘comedians’ are someone who should be sought out for their political insight or because of their deep and awe-inspiring intellect.  I mean let’s face it, none of them are particularly bright, so what would make anyone think that their opinion on any issue might really matter?

Letterman destroyed late night television, at least for me, with his massive ego and ignorant political commentaries.  He was known for his stunts like adjusting his tie, or driving thru a McDonalds drive thru several times.  It grew old very fast and he just couldn’t face the fact that it was time to go.  He was another of those who had become so addicted to the spotlight he couldn’t see the end was at hand.  Now he throws in his two cents worth on our President.  And he has joined the ranks of Al Gore with the ridiculous beard, always a cry for attention.  Frankly, it’s kinda sad.  His “satire” was always too safe to be called “satire”.  If you want to be a true satyr you must also go after the politically incorrect topics.  It’s fine to be a coward and to stay safe making only main stream accepted jokes.  But it’s not satire.

And like I said earlier, there was a time when I thought Letterman was pretty good and worth tuning in to watch.  He was almost enjoyable to watch back then.  He had what was a truly innovative approach to late night talk show comedy.  I loved that he had absolutely no patience with celebrity pretentiousness!  When those show businesses twits came on, he insisted that they raise their game and not just sit there looking pretty.  And then, as we got to know him through the Nineties and beyond, his warped political views and even worse personal behavior just turned me off.  He probably stayed on television ten years too long because it was obvious that he was bored with what he was doing.  Too bad.  For a while there he was really fun to watch.




So riddle me this, why is it that anyone with the slightest amount of commonsense would want to waste any amount of time listening to some wacky leftwing TV cook regarding their opinion on American politics?  Especially one that is little more than just another brain-dead liberal.  It’s right up there with choosing to listen to the many ‘half-baked’ Hollyweird loons who spew their idiotic drivel.  But it was in an interview with Reason magazine that Anthony Bourdain, and rather surprisingly so, confessed that he is “nauseated” by the contempt with which “privileged Eastern liberals such as myself” hold their fellow red state Americans.

Apparently, Mr. Bourdain, well-known celebrity cook and self-described “privileged Eastern liberal”, slammed his fellow leftist elites this week, arguing that their disdain for working-class Americans is what helped to create “the upswell of rage and contempt” that in turn helped to propel Donald Trump to the presidency.  Bourdain was quoted as saying, “The utter contempt with which privileged Eastern liberals such as myself discuss red-state, gun-country, working-class America as ridiculous and morons and rubes is largely responsible for the upswell of rage and contempt and desire to pull down the temple that we’re seeing now.”

He said, “I’ve spent a lot of time in gun-country, God-fearing America. There are a hell of a lot of nice people out there, who are doing what everyone else in this world is trying to do: the best they can to get by, and take care of themselves and the people they love. When we deny them their basic humanity and legitimacy of their views, however different they may be than ours, when we mock them at every turn, and treat them with contempt, we do no one any good. Nothing nauseates me more than preaching to the converted.”  As far as I’m concerned Bourdain is just one more leftwing hypocrite on what has come to be a very long list of many.

Bourdain, who is a New York City native and an outspoken critic of the president-elect, said he thinks “the rise of authoritarianism” is a “global trend and one that should be of concern to everyone.” Still, he argued, the belittling or dismissive attitudes of his peers toward Trump’s supporters is counterproductive.  He said, “The self-congratulatory tone of the privileged left — just repeating and repeating and repeating the outrages of the opposition — this does not win hearts and minds.”  And then he went on to say, “It doesn’t change anyone’s opinions. It only solidifies them and makes things worse for all of us.”  Pretty profound for a cook.

Apparently he was also asked his opinion of HBO host Bill Maher.  Bourdain appeared on Maher’s show Real Time a few years back and, as we can see, it didn’t leave a very favorable impression.  And it was regarding Mr. Maher that Bourdain said, “[Maher is] insufferably smug. Really the worst of the smug, self-congratulatory left. I have a low opinion of him. I did not have an enjoyable experience on his show. Not a show I plan to do again. He’s a classic example of the smirking, contemptuous, privileged guy who lives in a bubble. And he is in no way looking to reach outside, or even look outside, of that bubble, in an empathetic way.”

With all that said I think it might be worth noting Bourdain really ain’t that much of a fan of those who live in flyover country either.  As proof of that I offer other comments of note from the TV cook which include the time that he said the world would only be at peace when Whites are bred out of existence.  Or when he attributed the supposed harmony of Singaporean society to miscegenation.  In reality, Singapore owes its orderliness to harsh laws that are very strictly enforced. The population there is 70 percent ethnic Chinese, and they give no sign of wanting to mix with the native Malay Muslims, imported Africans, or anyone else.

This guy Bourdain is another one of those left wing creeps who were they to be living in any country other than the good old U. S. of A., would be selling pencils on some street corner.  Like most of his leftwing compatriots who call Hollyweird home, he has more money than sense.  Personally, I think Mr. Bourdain is just another frustrated Hitlery supporter who has yet to come to grips with the fact that his favored candidate lost.  He too seems to suffer from that which has come to infect so many on the left known as Trump derangement syndrome.  I see his recent interview with Reason magazine as being little more than some weird form of therapy.


Maher 1

Ya know, if those on the left are so confident that Hitlery is going to beat Trump like a redheaded stepchild why is it that they continue to see the need for using such vitriolic rhetoric whenever talking about Trump.  Democrats, as well as their many socialist supporters, have become nearly apoplectic over the Trump candidacy.  And the reason I even bring this up is because the always charming Bill Maher recently made yet another profound statement in his already-long list of profound statements earlier this week when he went on one of his psychotic rants maligning black Republicans as “Uncle Toms” and comparing Trump’s sons to Nazis.

In a live version of his HBO freak show, ‘Real Time’, Maher chided any minority that dares to vote for Trump, especially black Americans, calling them the derogatory “Uncle Tom,” essentially saying that the color of their skin dictates how they should think and vote.  In short, Maher has now officially outed himself as being a racist.  Maher said, “New rule: Marginalized black Republicans and marginalized gay Republicans have to come together and form a new group called The Uncle Tom’s Log Cabin Republicans.”  And the fact that such a statement actually prompted laughter, paints a pretty sad picture of those watch this boob.

Maher also directed his mean-spirited smugness at Donald Trump’s sons, going on to use that all-too-common leftist trope by comparing them to Nazis.  Maher said, “There was there was an outbreak of Norovirus, the one they get on cruise ships, at the convention.”  And this reject from some mental ward went on to say, “They said avoid shaking hands. So, if you see the Trump boys, just Sieg Heil and walk right on by.”  Maher later expanded on this German Nazi theme when he said: “Do people realize if they are elected Donald Trump, really the people that are going to be running the country are Douche Bag Von Fuckface Trump and Thurston Shit Bag III?”

This Hitler comparison nonsense has gotten to be pretty lame and pathetic, to say nothing of the fact that after years of having used it you’d think these people who are supposed to be so clever could have long ago come up with something new. The liberals have worn out this insult and need to conjure up some new irrelevant label in an effort to try to keep their dystopian dreams alive. If these ignoramuses were only half as intelligent and witty as they think they are, they’d realize that the party that they claim allegiance to has vastly more similarities to the Nazis, including the most obvious one socialism, than does the party they hate.

And why is it that whenever people think of evil people, the first and only person that seems to ever come to mind is Adolf Hitler?!  Have we forgotten what Joseph Stalin did in his own country?  Or how about Mao Tse Tung, or Pol Pot or even Saddam Hussein?!  Do people think that these people somehow pale in comparison to Hitler?  Personally I’m far more concerned about the prospects of our country becoming another Venezuela, a direction in which we already seem to headed thanks to their hero, Barry!  That’s a far more real concern than is fearing Trump is somehow another Hitler!  And it’s the socialist policies of the left that are greatest cause for concern.

But I find as being the most disturbing is the fact that someone can get away with spewing this kind of blatant racism on national TV and not suffer any kind of backlash or consequences.  And you’ll notice that it’s this kind of language is ALWAYS coming from someone on the left.  Now you would think that such rhetoric would draw condemnation from those whom such language is used to promote or defend, but since more often than not it’s always directed at someone on the right it is therefore seen as being acceptable.  Which makes it all the more clear just what frauds race baiters like Sharpton and Jackson really are!

I realize that Maher supposed to be a “comedian”, and I use that term VERY loosely, and likely sees himself as being some sort of a social activist.  But outside the bizarre little clique he’s neither.  It makes me wonder what type of people are watching shows like his and The View that keep these shows alive. The idiocy of people like Maher is mind numbing, believing that black people who have conservative values are Uncle Tom’s and sell outs to their race. The amount of truth and facts that people would have to ignore and dismiss to conclude that the Democrat Party is the one that has the minorities best interests at heart is absolutely astounding.



When it comes to more recent New York City politics it’s pretty obvious that the nut doesn’t fall very far from the tree.  But since he has served in both Boston and Los Angeles, Mr. Bratton’s rather leftward slant regarding gun rights, besides coming as no surprise, likely made him the ideal choice as, current communist mayor of ‘The Big Apple’, Bill de Blasio’s police commissioner.  This is his second shot at being the city’s top cop, the first time around Bratton was forced to resign while under investigation for accepting unauthorized trips from corporations as well as individuals.  Which I guess, was seen as being a resume enhancer.

Anyway, it was on Communist News Network (CNN) earlier this week that New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton was discussing terrorism and Donald Trump, and after watching a clip host Don Lemon played featuring Trump saying that Americans are under threat from foreign terrorists coming in to this country, Bratton responded by saying that it’s Americans and guns that are actually the biggest problem we face.  This has become the typical mantra of many on the left as they work to increase their efforts to rip from the hands of law abiding Americans that which is something constitutionally guaranteed to them.

Frankly, it’s this kind of idiotic drivel, that Americans are somehow more of a threat to the country than are these Muslim terrorists, that is so offensive and on many fronts.  But is especially grotesque when hearing it from the top cop in the city that is now home to a somber memorial at Ground Zero. Terrorism, both domestic and foreign-born, has nothing to do with the availability of guns. The notion that the Second Amendment enables terror of any kind is demonstrably false — because that is what he is saying: not that we face a threat from criminals who use guns, but we face a threat from Americans “who have access to firearms.”

It’s all the gun’s fault, you see. It’s the EASY access.  It’s not the threat from Islamic terrorists.  A threat that is on the rise, is brutal, leaves many casualties in its wake, is frequent, and has consequences well beyond just the tragic deaths and injuries.  And too many of our leaders, mostly Democrats, seem not to be all that concerned.  And you would think that a police commissioner should know these things.  That a New York City police commissioner, especially, should live and breathe them.  What a despicable, politically correct, factually bereft rant from a committed leftist gun-control fanatic. How typical. How utterly predictable.  How dangerous.

But Chief, if guns are illegal in Chicago, what the Hell is going on there?  How many gun related deaths have already occurred there in this still very young year?  Hold on a minute, I’ll tell you:  As of yesterday (30 Mar) 128 were shot and killed, 673 were shot and wounded.  Now I would argue that if guns were legal in ‘The Windy City, both numbers would not only be lower, but would likely be significantly lower.  But then, Bill, you don’t want to hear that.  But look, this latest example is but one more reason, on what apparently is a very long list of many, why Bratton is hated by the NYPD rank and file, and basically anyone with an ounce of sense who knows him.

Bratton’s idiotic premise that “Americans with guns pose a bigger threat than terrorism” is so patently false and for any number of reasons.  Not the least of which are: 1) It is physically impossible to eliminate the 300 million guns in America; only the LEGAL ones can regulated, but it’s the ILLEGAL ones which do the most damage. 2) Firearms accidents, etc., like far more pervasive automobile accidents, are relatively constant year-by-year, whereas terrorism has demonstrated at least the potential to grow exponentially, as it has recently in Europe. 3) And then, as we saw in San Bernardino, Americans WITHOUT Guns are really nothing more than soft targets for these murdering Muslims.  Imagine if just one of those victims had actually had a gun.  How much lower would the body count have been?

And what’s scary is the fact that this imbecile is responsible for keeping New Yorkers safe.  New Yorkers should be afraid, VERY afraid!  The biggest threat to our Constitution and our way of life are people like this guy who think our ‘rights’ are the problem.  My guess is this nut believes that Mike Brown was “shot with his hands in the air”.  It’s the dumbing down of America.  It should frighten every single American that complete morons like this boob are able to get into such positions, being responsible for things that are so far beyond the capabilities or their intelligence.  We insist upon granting to these losers on the left far too much control over our lives.



I’ve never really understood why it is that so many people seem to be of the opinion that Jonny Leibowitz, aka Jon Stewart formerly of the Daily Show, is such a smart guy.  I mean really, give anyone the army of so-called “comedy” writers that was behind this boob, and it’s likely anyone would be able to sound funny and maybe even a little smart.  However, when left to his own devices old Jon sounds neither all the bright nor particularly funny.  He just sounds stupid!

But be that as it may it was this past Tuesday that Leibowitz was up to his old sophomoric tricks when he blasted Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump and Ben Carson during a fundraiser in New York for, of all things, veterans.  Funny, usually it’s those of his political persuasion who couldn’t care less about the plight of our veterans.  Kinda makes me wonder where the money might really be going.  Perhaps some rehab palace for Hollywood drugees?

So it was that Leibowitz was a featured ‘performer’ at something called the “Stand Up for Heroes” benefit at the Theater at Madison Square Garden along with fellow morons Seth Meyers, Ray Romano and ‘singer’ Bruce Springsteen.  What a cadre of leftwing nutjobs.  Supposedly they had gathered to raise funds for wounded service members and their families.  And why is it that every time Springsteen ‘sings’, he looks like he’s taking a wickedly huge dump?

Leibowitz wasted little time in picking up right where he left off when he taped his final Daily Show appearance earlier this summer.  He said, “Are we really doing this Donald Trump thing? We’re really doing that as a country?”  He added, “He’s f***ed.”  And said. “I like to put my name in giant letters on everything I own as much as the next guy, but the only other people that do that are like 8-year-olds going to camp.”  Man, is this guy clever or what?

It was then he broke into his best Trump impression: “‘Where did I put that building? Oh, there it is, Trump. Boom. Where’s my f***ing helicopter? Boom, Trump…. Where’s my wife? Boom, Trump, nice.”  He said, “People are like, ‘I like Trump; he says what he thinks.’ What he thinks is stupid.”  And he added, “That’s like if your friend is like, ‘I would like to f*** your mom.’ Why would you say that?… I don’t give a shit if you’re politically correct, just be correct, correct.”

And then, of course, it was next that Leibowitz turned his sights on Dr. Carson, calling him “the greatest juxtaposition between volume of voice and craziness of sh** he says.”  He said, “He says the softest spoken crazy shit I’ve ever heard.”  And he went on to say, “You watch him in the debates – ‘All I said was Obamacare is like slavery… When I was young I nearly killed a nun with a… hammer.’”  Man, is that funny or what? No, not really.  More high school-like humor than anything else.

And then when it was finally time for Leibowitz to exist stage left, Springsteen returned with guitar in hand to put on yet another demonstration by one who should have long ago realized that any further attempts at singing would be nothing more than a complete waste of time.  But like most of his ilk, they never really seem to grasp when it’s time to quit as they have become so addicted to the limelight.  And these days Bruce can carry a tune with a wheelbarrow.

You know, as a veteran myself I view any money raised by the likes of these pathetic scumbags as being pretty severely tainted, and as such I would want nothing to do with it.  Because I know that the only reason any of them even took part in this effort to raise money, was not because of any feeling of respect they might possess for any of those who have served.  It was only because it provided them with an opportunity to demonstrate just how pathetic they really are.


Juan Williams 1

While I’m not exactly sure what his credentials are as a journalist, he constantly demonstrates his credentials as a rabid, card-carrying, left-wing propagandist.  The most recent of what is his blind devotion to the leftist cause came on July 17, the day after which Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez, obviously a radical Muslim, opened fire on a recruiting center and then a reserve center, gunning down four US Marines and a Sailor.  It was then that Williams actually said he was “baffled” by the push to end gun free zones in military recruiting centers.  Baffled?  Really Juan?

In seeming to ignore completely that we’re talking about military members, Williams said the center which was targeted is in a “strip mall” and that changing the gun-free policy would mean people would be walking around with guns, which could lead to “workplace violence.”  He also suggested it could create a situation where a simple “dispute in the parking lot” could escalate into armed confrontation.  Fox News’ Martha MacCallum countered Williams by pointing out that this was a military recruiting center–regardless of where it was located–and that it why it was targeted.

But Williams was not be deterred from the insanity of his pathetic argument. He responded by saying, “What we’re talking about Martha is, you’d be in favor of sort of the wild, wild west. Everybody has a gun on them as they’re walking around the mall? Not in my mall, I don’t want it.”  MacCallum then continued to express her concern over the fact that our military personnel and their families are increasingly targeted and that military gun free zones make them sitting ducks, a fact that seemed to have been missed entirely, or simply ignored, by Williams as it is with most leftists.

Williams said, “Martha, you can pander to fear, anxiety, anger over what happened [in Chattanooga], but it is not a substantial policy to say, where we have military police–who do have guns–where we have situations where we say, ‘We don’t want everybody carrying guns’–that somehow that’s illogical or bad policy or blame President Clinton.”  There was nothing said that would indicate that anyone is advocating everyone carrying guns.  Again, what we’re talking about here are military members, and Williams knows that, but doesn’t want to talk about it.

Williams as you know, or should know by now, has devoted much of his time over the course of the last seven years being one of the more vocal Obama-apologists.  To Juan, Barry can do absolutely no wrong.  And why do you suppose that is?  Well, there is but one reason.  It’s because like Juan, Barry is black.  Oh, and is determined in his efforts to destroy this country.  Whenever invited to discuss a topic, hopefully as an adult, Williams comes to any discussion woefully ignorant.  His arguments rarely make sense and, more often than not, consist of little more that leftwing talking points.


liberals 03

How it is, exactly, that in a nation where those on the left have absolutely no problem whatsoever in allowing the killing of millions of black babies each and every year, the method of choice being abortion, it’s at the very same time, and from many of the same people, we also continue to hear how it is that black lives matter?  Or that there can take place in this country a record number of murders every year, most of them black and in a place that has the strictest gun laws in the country, and yet we continue to hear from the gun control crowd that if only we had stricter gun laws we could finally bring an end to all of the senseless violence taking place in this country?

And it is from those who are so desperate to take guns out of the hands of law abiding Americans that we saw what was yet another example of the liberal lunacy that continues to plague this country.  It was demonstrated just this past Friday when California Attorney General and now U.S. Senate candidate Kamala Harris continued to defend sanctuary cities even after illegal alien Francisco Lopez-Sanchez confessed to murdering Kathryn Steinle in San Francisco.  She attempted to justify her idiotic stance by suggesting that the admitted crime of one illegal immigrant should not dictate immigration policy for all illegals.  Is that not just plain nuts?

Let’s face it, a better example of the left’s hypocrisy on murder would be difficult to find despite the fact that the examples of such hypocrisy are as numerous as they are dangerous.  And while I’m quite sure that it all makes sense to liberals, to rest of us, it sounds like nothing more than the liberal lunacy that it is.  I mean think about it, on one hand when one criminal commits a public crime with a gun, the left falls into line to punish all gun owners with new gun laws.  Yet on the other hand, when an illegal immigrant admits to gunning down a woman on San Francisco’s Pier 14, they say it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with their preferred policy.  DUH?

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Harris responded to news of Sanchez’s five previous deportations, seven felony charges, and ‘alleged’ murder of Steinle by saying, “What needs to be looked at is comprehensive immigration reform, that’s the bottom line. Let’s not react to one specific case, when we are looking at a national problem.”  Then this obvious escapee from a rubber-room said, “Let’s react to that specific case in prosecuting that specific murder, and making sure he faces very swift consequences and accountability.”  She went on to say, “On the issue of immigration policy, let’s be smarter.”  How about we simply enforce the law, what a novel idea!

In 2013, when Harris was pushing for a better gun confiscation plan for an outstanding list of prohibited persons who own guns, the Huffington Post reported she had no problem casting what was described as being a rather wide net and defending it by saying, “This is not about ideology or politics. It is a false choice to suggest you are either in support of the Second Amendment or in favor of reasonable gun safety rules. We can do both.”  We already have numerous gun laws, just as we already have numerous immigration laws, neither of which Barry seems to have the slightest interest in enforcing.  We don’t need MORE laws, simply enforce the ones we have.

And in August 2012 the Davis Guard reported that Harris endorsed an “assault weapons” ban that impacted any Californian who owned a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine. The bill’s sponsor, Democrat state senator Leland Yee, argued that the ban was necessary because “similarly-styled weapons were used in the Aurora, Colorado massacre.”  Harris had no problem supporting that ban, although it was a reaction to the murderous actions of a lone gunman in Colorado.  But ask her now about abolishing sanctuary cities, and she’ll tell you overarching immigration policy should not be set based on the actions of one illegal alien in San Francisco.

I suppose there’s always a chance I could become a liberal, but I’ve just never wanted to submit to the required surgery for doing so.  That would be, of course, the dreaded frontal lobotomy.  Because who is it that could ever come to think the way these people do without having first been operated on to remove what would have to be a rather substantial portion of one’s brain?  There is nothing that any of these people ever say that makes any amount of sense.  And what’s more than a little scary is the fact that we seem to have a growing number of them on our side despite the fact that they claim to be conservatives.  We’re supposed to be adults here!