THE CLOWN ‘NEWS’ NETWORK (CNN) SINKS TO AN ALL NEW LOW…

CNN 5

First of all let me start off by saying that despite what many of those in the Democrat Party would like everyone to believe, taking my guns will NOT prevent the next mass shooting from occurring whether it takes place at a school or in some Vegas hotel parking lot.  Second, we all need to remember that these demands for stricter gun laws have nothing to do with public safety, or even about gun control.  What it’s about, and what it’s always been about, is people control.  And if you can’t bring yourself to see that then clearly you are someone who should never ever be permitted to own a gun, of any kind.  Because that’s what drives the left’s effort at gun control.

If you’re like me you were totally unaware that last night the Clown ‘News’ Network (CNN) sponsored what they laughably billed as being a ‘town hall’, the purpose of which appeared to be nothing more than attempt to shame those of us who are proud defenders of our Second Amendment.  And I can now say that my low regard for both Jake Tapper and CNN has now officially bottomed out.  They showed themselves as being beneath the dignity of anything approaching honest journalism.  As we have long known, when the left can’t win a debate with facts they always attack the opponent, and get emotional.  And this town hall/hatefest, was no exception.

As we all know emotion solves nothing, and those people who continue using it fail to understand that fact.  They scream, and they yell thinking that it helps them make their point, but such antics demonstrate nothing but their desperation.  Let them scream at their next mass murder scene when their lack of effective ideas does nothing to solve the problem.  This ‘town hall’ was nothing more than a pathetic use of raw emotion by CNN in an attempt to undercut our Second Amendment rights. The Second Amendment distinguishes between free people and slaves, and it was enacted into our Constitution as the citizens’ check on an abusive government.

This scripted student, that loon teacher, this buffoon sheriff, and that shill crowd want to blame the gun rather than blame the monster who pulled the trigger.  And if this incompetent sheriff really believes that 18-year-olds are just “immature kids,” as he put it, and, therefore, shouldn’t be permitted to own a gun, then maybe we need to revisit the entire concept of whether 18-year-olds should be permitted to vote.  Further, where is the blame on the FBI for failing to investigate this obviously very twisted individual when it admits that in early January it was given specific and concrete information about him and his desire to shoot up a school?

And further, where is the blame on this blowhard, buffoon of a sheriff for not taking the necessary steps to have this monster committed when the police were sent to his home on at least 39 separate occasions. This monster was a ticking time bomb and Sheriff Blowhard did absolutely nothing!  And I may be in the minority here but is anybody else starting to hate these smug and snot-nosed little brats and their condescending tones?  I’m sorry for what happened to their school but I WON’T be lectured or talked down to by a 17 year old punk still living with mommy and daddy. The United States doesn’t make public policy based on the tantrums thrown by kids.

And it was during this freakshow event that we heard from Democrat Senator Bill Nelson who, in seizing the emotion of the event, indicated that he now wants to ban over 200 different rifles in response to last week’s Florida school shooting.  Nelson, for those of you who may not be aware, is up for re-election this November which might help to explain his rather overzealous, and albeit rather disgusting, approach to dealing with this most recent tragedy.  And it was also Nelson who, back on February 15 and 16, took the opportunity to claim the AR-15 is “not for hunting” but for killing.  Because of this, he says the AR-15 does not enjoy Second Amendment protections.

Nelson knows it’s not the guns, that it’s the evil people pulling the triggers that commit the murder of innocents.  But he sees an opportunity begging to be taken advantage of and he can’t bring himself to let it go by.  Does he really believe taking guns away from law-abiding citizens will in any way stop someone that is hell-bent on killing innocent people?  Of course not.  People shoot people, people stab people, people run people over with vehicles, people beat people with baseball bats and on and on.  The only way to stop a bad person with a gun is with a (trained) good person with a gun.  You know that, I know that, and even this boob, Nelson, knows that.

And you would think that any individual reasonably educated would understand that our Second Amendment was not thought to be important enough to be included in our Constitution simply for the purpose of hunting.  The Second Amendment was put in place as being our hedge against tyranny and it provides to “We the People” the ability, as well as the right, to defend ourselves.  Thank God the Founders guaranteed our right to keep and bear arms.  They wanted the citizenry to possess the same hardware as the military, back then.  And it remains to this day that the millions of gun owners in America are the very best deterrent against any wannabe dictator.

And as a result of CNN’s anti-gun town hall/hate-fest, it appears that both the event itself and its kooky left-wing moderator, Jake Tapper, are now both facing widespread criticism over what many saw as a being a “show trial,” of sorts. Tapper is being singled out for much of the criticism from those who say he remained silent as abusive personal attacks were hurled at both Sen. Marco Rubio and NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch.  At the Wednesday night spectacle, those in favor of protecting our Second Amendment civil rights were seriously outnumbered by an audience packed with hostile gun-haters and emotional questioners, including children.

According to various reports, the anti-gun participants of this obviously staged event were provided with scripted questions all of which were written and provided by CNN.  Now of course the last-place network has denied this by accusing a school shooting survivor of being a liar.  His accusation, however, can be considered as very credible given CNN’s long and rather disturbing history of using plants.  Throughout the hour, the audience heckled, howled, and poured derision on Loesch and Rubio.  Other than admonishing his audience for calling Loesch a “murderer,” Tapper stood by in silent approval as abuse and personal attacks rained down on his outnumbered guests.

Tapper, who likes to present himself as male feminist, also chose to remain silent when the audience booed a rape survivor who now supports the Second Amendment. CNN and Tapper, a former Democrat operative and Salon contributor, have faced growing criticism over the climate of hate the network frequently manufactures against President Trump and his supporters, or anyone on the right — oftentimes through fake news.  Tapper frequently attacks others over their tone and rhetoric, he does so while ginning up hatred against Trump by smearing the president as “un-American,” “unhinged,” and “unmoored.”  It’s just what he does, it’s ‘fake news.’

And when it comes to what it is that Tapper and his network would have us believe, and some of the facts they would prefer that we remain unaware of, consider the following:

Myth: Gun availability is what is causing school shootings

Fact: Schoolyard shootings have been occurring since at least 1974, so it is not a new phenomenon due to increases in gun ownership.

Fact: More than 50% of these murderers started thinking about their assaults two or more weeks before the shooting, and 75% planned-out their attacks, showing that these events are not spontaneous.

Fact: In rural areas, guns are everywhere, and children are taught to shoot at young ages – yet these areas are almost devoid of schoolyard shootings. Clearly, availability is not the issue.

Myth: Gun availability leads to massacres.

Fact: In 62% of mass public shootings, the assailant had a history of having “displayed signs of mental health problems prior to the killings.”

Myth: Assault weapons are a serious problem in the U.S.

Fact: In 1994, before the Federal “assault weapons ban,” you were eleven (11) times more likely to be beaten to death than to be killed by an “assault weapon.”

Fact: In the first 7 years since the ban was lifted, murders declined 43%, violent crime 43%, rapes 27% and robberies 49%.

Fact: Nationally, “assault weapons” were used in 1.4% of crimes involving firearms and 0.25% of all violent crime before the enactment of any national or state “assault weapons” ban. In many major urban areas (San Antonio, Mobile, Nashville, etc.) and some entire states (Maryland, New Jersey, etc.) the rate is less than 0.1%.

Fact: Even weapons misclassified as “assault weapons” (common in the former Federal and California “assault weapons” confiscations) are used in less than 1% of all homicides.

Fact: Police reports show that “assault weapons” are a non-problem:

And lastly, if we are foolish enough to allow the Democrats, along with a certain number of RINO Republicans, to exploit these obviously distraught children in their effort to convince us that we need to willingly relinquish our Second Amendment rights, and that we would somehow be better off by doing so, then it truly is the beginning of the end.  Personally, if I were ever to lose a child in such a horrific way, I would be far angrier at those who missed the many warning signs as well as at those who insist upon making our schools ‘gun free zones’ which do nothing more than to turn our children into targets.  And what is it that motivates them to do so?

Advertisements

JEFF FLAKE’S TOO LONG, TOO SLOW, AND QUITE PAINFUL, DEPARTURE CONTINUES…

Flake 10

Apparently more determined than ever, in his effort to be the biggest pain in the ass imaginable as he now heads for the exit, pro-open borders, and soon to be ex- senator, Jeff Flake has committed to introducing what is his likely dead-on-arrival immigration legislation that would, if passed, result in giving amnesty to potentially millions of illegal aliens in exchange for three years of funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. What a deal, how could anyone say no to that?  Right?

Flake recently took pen to paper composing a Washington (Com)Post op-ed in which this avid supporter of wage-crushing, mass low-skilled immigration into the U.S., said his minor wall funding-for-amnesty plan is necessary because the nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled on the ex-president Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program “represent the very best of America.”  How is it that those who are the very best of America are actually here ILLEGALLY?

Anyway, it was in his little piece that Flake wrote, “But there are teachers, students and members of the military who are DACA recipients. They are friends and colleagues who represent the very best of America — hard workers and productive members of their families and communities — and they do not have the luxury of accepting defeat and moving on to the next agenda item.”

While admitting defeat regarding his effort, and that of a few of his fellow Establishment Republican’s, to work with Democrats to pass what would be nothing short of a massive, wage-cutting amnesty plan without any reduction, whatsoever, to current legal immigration levels, whereby more than one million mostly low-skilled legal immigrants are admitted to the country annually, Flake, like the true spineless RINO that he is, placed blame for that defeat squarely on President Trump.

And Flake, in what can only be described as being true RINO fashion, made clear his true colors by choosing to be one of 14 pro-amnesty and business-first RINO senators who chose to block a President Trump-endorsed immigration plan that would have given DACA illegal aliens amnesty while eventually reducing the number of legal immigrants who enter the country every year to raise the wages and quality of life of America’s working and middle class.  Flake is nothing but a disgusting liar.

Flake went on to write, “But if I’m being candid, after what we’ve experienced over these past weeks, I can’t see this Congress agreeing with this president on a package that includes a path to citizenship for DACA participants coupled with significant changes to our legal immigration structure. That comprehensive immigration reform has proved to be beyond our grasp.”

And he added, “That is why, when the Senate reconvenes next week, the first action I will take will be to introduce a bill extending DACA protections for three years and providing $7.6 billion to fully fund the first three years of the administration’s border-security proposal. I’ll be the first to admit this “three for three” approach is far from a perfect solution, but it would provide a temporary fix by beginning the process of improving border security and ensuring DACA recipients will not face potential deportation.”

And in putting forward this plan of his, Flake makes very clear exactly which side of the immigration issue he’s on.  Because you see, his plan does not include any of the illegal immigration reforms that the Trump administration has demanded, including provisions that would close legal loopholes to more swiftly and effectively stem illegal immigration at the border.  So it should come as a surprise to no one, including Flake himself, that he’s a one term wonder being encouraged to head toward the exit.

After all, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has made it abundantly clear that without closing the legal loopholes outlined by the agency in an immigration deal, a border wall would stand alone trying to deter illegal immigration without any other major reforms to keep illegal aliens from entering the country.  But such warnings always seem to fall on deaf ears when it comes to the anti-America, pro-illegal immigration crowd in the Democrat Party and to RINOs like Flake.

The entire concept of expansive amnesty is nothing short of insanity.  Because it has the potential of becoming uncontrollable and could therefore result in a stifling of recent wage increases that American workers have enjoyed due to President Trump’s “America First” immigration enforcement measures.  But such a notion seems not to bother, in the least, supporters of such a concept.  And they pretend that such a claim is nothing more than an argument made by those who are anti-immigration.

And it’s Flake’s plan that would almost immediately flood the U.S. labor market with at least an additional permanent one to 3.5 million foreign nationals who would be legalized and thus eligible to legally compete for working and middle-class jobs against Americans, as well as a flood of illegal alien workers who would likely storm the U.S.-Mexico border in the wake of an amnesty.  We must work on preventing those from entering our country illegally.  We can no longer afford not to.

And I can only assume that Flake must hate legal American citizens as much as the Democrats do.  If he views law-breaking invaders, illegal aliens, as representing the best, what other conclusion is there.  And at what point is it that these invaders no longer represent the best of America?  When they rape or murder American citizens?  Or when they get away with crimes committed in sanctuary cities and states that legal Americans would normally be sent to prison for committing?  Just sayin’.

Let’s face it, Flake and his RINO buddies are little more than traitors.  These DACA illegal aliens are nothing but a bunch of anti-American, anti-White, culturally violent, welfare dependent, spiteful and vindictive parasites who have no desire to assimilate. And why would these RINOs want millions more people who, after gaining their U.S. citizenship, would proceed to reliably vote Democrat?  I mean where’s the logic in that?  And why are they in that big of a hurry to bring about their political demise?

Why is it that so many RINOs seem so willing to take part in bringing about their own political suicide by allowing unlimited immigration?  Low labor costs can only be part of it.  Flake claims they represent the very best of America, and yet in Flake’s home state of Arizona, studies show they’re much more likely to commit crimes.  And yet we’re supposed to believe that DACA recipients are all valedictorians, soldiers or doctors.  It is much more likely that they’re high school dropouts and gang bangers.

Those of us who voted for President Trump know how exactly how this immigration problem can be, and should be, solved.  And we all remember how it was that he promised to get it solved.  It’s all quite simple, really, and we should not be willing to accept any diversions from, allowances for, or variations of, the plan regarding how we all know it needs to be implemented.  The plan is pretty basic and of course it begins with the building of a big beautiful wall.  The simple plan is as follows:

  1. Build the wall.
  2. Terminate all benefits given to illegal aliens and their family members.
  3. Enforce all immigration laws.
  4. Crack down on businesses and employers that hire illegal aliens.
  5. Deport all illegal aliens and anchor babies.
  6. Terminate all funding for sanctuary cities and states.
  7. Implement and enforce E-Verify.
  8. End chain migration.
  9. Terminate visa lottery system.
  10. Arrest all politicians and businesses that harbor illegal aliens.
  11. End the anchor baby BS. Anchor babies are not USA citizens.

FROM WITHIN THE ASYLUM KNOWN AS HOLLYWEIRD…

Hollyweird 3

Isn’t it odd how the loudest accusations regarding the fitness of President Trump to serve as our president because of his being a racist, or mentally ill, or a sociopath most always originate from what has become a particular enclave comprised of individuals who are some of the most racist, most perverted and, dare I say, dangerously mentally ill people in the entire country.   And I can’t help but wonder if there will ever come a day when any of those on the left, especially these very same people, will come to grips with the fact that it is they who are most responsible for Donald Trump’s being elected president in the first place.  Because were it not for the fact that a socialist was elected in 2008 and 2012, and another socialist was the Democrat candidate in 2016, a Democrat would now be sitting on the Oval Office.

And yet useful idiots like everyone’s favorite ‘Meat Head’, Rob Reiner, continue their assaults on our president with Reiner having now escalated his attacks on President Trump just this past Sunday, when he took to social media to demand that Republican ‘patriots’ take a stand to “end” what he called the ‘sickness’ of his presidency. The 70-year-old filmmaker, an all too frequent critic of the president who previously launched a committee to explore possible Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race, blasted President Trump in a Twitter rant in apparent response to a school shooting in Florida this week that left 17 people dead and 15 others injured.  Perhaps he should spend a bit more of his time trying to make movies that turn out to be other than box office flops instead of continuing to harp about the president.

Anyway, it was in his recent twitter rant that old ‘Meat Head’ wrote, “How much longer do we have to put up with a mentally ill sociopath?”  And then in demonstrating his rather obvious lack of originality he went on to write, “When the f*cked up psyche of the leader of the free world comes before the horrific deaths of innocent children, it’s time for GOP patriots to stand up and end this sickness.”  Reiner repeatedly criticized President Trump on his Twitter account this week, both in response to the Florida attack and to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictments of 13 Russian nationals for some alleged interference in our 2016 presidential campaign.  Rarely in any of his idiotic Twitter rants does ‘Meat Head’ prove anything other than the fact he has become nearly completely unhinged.  It’s all so bizarre.

And it was in a Friday post that ‘Meat Head’ appeared to go so far as to actually accuse the president of treason after the Mueller’s indictments were announced.  He wrote, “It is now crystal clear that Russia had a profound impact on the 2016 election.” And then went on to write, “They have attacked US, they are continuing to attack US. If Trump is unwilling to acknowledge this and unwilling to protect US, the word TREASON is now center stage.”  I always find it more than a little hypocritical whenever I hear these leftwing loons, like old ‘Meat Head’, throwing around the T-word.  Because there is nowhere else in this country that will you find a more concentrated number of treasonous vipers than right there in Hollyweird.  After all, if Liberalism is a mental illness, which it is, then Hollyweird is the psycho ward.

And of course ‘Meat Head’ also took the opportunity to accuse President Trump of failing to act on guns due to influence from the National Rifle Associate (NRA).  He wrote, “There are 21,000,000 reasons why Donald Trump refuses to protect our children from being slaughtered by guns.”  And added, “The NRA has deep pockets. But we will show them that our hearts and our pockets are deeper than theirs.”  Reiner spoke at the anti-Trump Women’s March Los Angeles in January, where he accused the president of “tearing away at the fabric of our democracy.”  Earlier this month, the filmmaker referred to President Trump’s presidency as “the last battle of the Civil War” while accepting some silly social justice award from the even sillier African American Film Critics Association Awards in Beverly Hills.

‘Meat Head’ has worked for years toward the destruction of America.  He’s a confused soul who believes so many things that aren’t true, because reality does not comport with his particular perspective.  His life has been pampered and protected and so far removed is he from the common folk that refuses to acknowledge that stricter gun laws leave those same common folk vulnerable to hoodlums and tyrants, while the elite, like himself, are shielded by private security and are treated deferentially by public servants. President Trump didn’t cause this violence, he didn’t collude with the Russians, he didn’t sell our uranium to any hostile powers and he didn’t abandon a girlfriend to drown in a sinking car.  President Trump is the least threatening man in Washington.  I’m not so sure about anyone else there these days.

I do think it’s important to keep in mind that as far as those like ‘Meat Head’ are concerned, it’s all about being a means to an end!  Most of these devoted leftists, who now comprise the Democrat Party, are of the opinion that our Constitution needs to be shredded in order for them to achieve their goal of a global government!  They want to put an end to the ‘Bill of Rights’ included in our Constitution and the first thing they see as being in need of being removed is our Second Amendment!  All the great socialist heroes of the American left from Stalin, to Mao, to Castro, to Chavez were able to successfully disarm their populace prior to administering their forced enlightenment.  ‘Meat Head’ seems to favor disarming law-abiding citizens so his globalist pals can then force socialism and poverty upon the rest of us.

And finally here’s a question for which I’d like to hear an answer from old ‘Meat Head’.  Why is it, do you suppose, that Barry ‘O’ and his corrupt band of Democrats never even made an attempt to pass ANY sort of ‘meaningful’ gun control during the entire two years that they were in complete control of Congress?  Well, ‘Meat Head’, I’ll tell ya why!  Because even your beloved Democrats saw gun control as being political suicide and something that would likely have started an insurrection.  Shootings were happening during Barry’s tenure and even though he did nothing, not a soul on the left was calling him treasonous, mentally ill, a sociopath or that he needed to be removed from office.  So as far as I’m concerned, ‘Meat Head’, you and all your friends can take your sanctimonious, hypocritical BS and shove it where the sun don’t shine.

MORE DEMOCRATS CRAWL OUT FROM UNDER THEIR ROCK…

908

Anyone who believes that ANY of the many Democrats who have thus far expressed their ‘outrage’ regarding the tragedy that recently took place at a Florida high school are doing so out of their deep ‘concern’ for public safety, is, without a doubt, among the most gullible individuals to be found anywhere on the planet.  I mean the bodies weren’t even cold before we had a number of these pathetic, scum-sucking hypocritical Democrats, including ex-president Barry ‘O’, crawling out from under their collective rock and doing their best to capitalize on this tragedy.  Hell, some of these creeps were even fund raising off of it.  If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about the modern day Democrat Party, you must be a Democrat.

Following comments made by his leftist colleagues from Connecticut just the day before, it was Democrat Bill Nelson who took to the Senate floor yesterday to take his turn at trying to score points from the high school shooting in Parkland, FL that resulted in 17 deaths and multiple injuries.  After a moment of silence, Nelson said, “At some point, we’ve got to say enough is enough. At some point we, as a society, have to come together and put a stop to this.”  It was from there that this refugee from a burn unit continued by saying, “To those who say now that it’s not the time to talk about gun violence because it’s too soon, we don’t want to politicize right after a tragedy. That’s what is said over and over. Then I would ask, when is the time?”

And it was then that this leftwing crackpot went on to ask, “How many more times do we have to do this? How many more folks have to die? When is enough going to be enough? So let’s don’t hide from it. Let’s have the conversation about this right now – not just about mental illness, and that’s part of it, not just about protection at our schools, and that’s part of it – let’s get to the root cause, let’s come together and help end this violence. Let’s talk about that 19 year old carrying an AR-15. Let’s do what needs to be done. And let’s get these assault weapons off our streets.”  I can only assume that Nelson must have been pretty confident that most of those likely to hear his idiotic rant, made from the Senate floor, were likely to be pretty stupid!

Nelson added, “Let’s just not talk about it. Let’s do something about it. Let’s make what happened at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School a pivotal moment in this country’s history, not because it was one of the largest mass shootings – but, hopefully, because it was the last.”  But I guess what worries me is what, exactly, that old Bill might be in favor of doing.  I mean we’ve had an “assault weapons’ ban before and it accomplished absolutely nothing, evidenced by the fact that it was allowed to die.  So what is that old Bill might have in mind this time around?  Because it’s usually when you have a guy like Nelson telling you you don’t need a gun, you can pretty much guarantee that it’s time you best start looking to purchase one.

But you know it’s just like Democrats to take full advantage of the ignorance of those who are so totally clueless when it comes to firearms by using completely bogus nomenclature whenever describing the AR-15 rifle or weapons like it.  They simply lie to the American people by calling it an assault rifle when it’s really nothing more than a semi-automatic rifle used for hunting or target shooting.  I have come to hate politicians like this creep Nelson with a passion for what they are doing to my country courtesy of the lies.  Democrat see it as appropriate to punish millions of law abiding gun owners because of the actions of one nut.  Ow about telling someone who has lost a family member to a drunk driver that liquor should now no longer be sold?

In truth, it’s progressive policies enacted into law by leftwing zealots like Nelson that are behind the breakdown, moral, social and even fiscal, of our society as well as of the disintegration of nuclear family. Incentivizing people who are incapable of caring for kids to have kids plus incentivizing men to not take responsibility for their kids and family are but the tip of the iceberg.  All of this culminates in some doughy kid shooting up a school.  It’s not rocket science. But to liberal Democrats looking for fake answers, I guess it is.  Once again I ask of these idiot Senators, define an ‘assault weapon.’  My definition of an assault weapon is one that can fire on full automatic and those have been banned since the 1930’s.  And that’s not what was used here.

Democrats refuse to acknowledge that guns are not the problem here.  In large part this is a mental health issue and one that the bleeding heart liberals are essentially responsible for creating.  It’s been a societal trend where we fail to first identify and then to treat people who exhibit extreme antisocial behavior.  Even in a case such as this where an individual has made overt threats, there appears to have no attempt to intervene either as a community or through some agency to make contact with the individual.  Don’t blame the police though. Now I’m not trying to be sarcastic or trite, but until a person has broken some law there’s very little that the police can do. Could the police have paid the individual a visit based on the YouTube threats, actually yes, but realistically that’s as far as that would go.

Let’s face it, if politicians like Nelson were being honest they would simply come out and say what they’d really like to see happen here, which is nothing short of confiscation.  And because the only way to get those guns is to go door to door, what we’re taking about is the turning of ordinary, law abiding citizens into lawbreakers over nothing more than owning guns that were once legal.  Because there are simply way too many people with legally purchased weapons who would refuse to give them up.  And something else few on the left want to talk about is that gun laws don’t matter to criminals who are already accustomed to breaking laws.  Guns will always be available.  Anybody remember Chicago during the prohibition?

Democrats are on a mission, they have a hidden agenda the focus of which is to change the racial demographics in this country, so that they can then secure for themselves a reelection proof government.  And make no mistake, once Democrats achieve that goal, they will be in position to nationalize major corporations, repeal the Bill of Rights and force whites to pay reparations to blacks, as well as every other grieving group. Democrats also understand that once we realize that it’s going to be impossible to kick them out of office by democratic means, freedom loving people will revolt. That is why they desperate to disarm us now, so that we’ll be unable to oppose them in the future.  These school shootings are just a pretense.

NOTHING BRINGS DEMOCRATS OUTTA THE WOODWORK FASTER THAN A TRAGEDY…

906

I think we can all agree that there is nothing that brings slimy hypocritical Democrats crawling out of the woodwork faster than a good old fashioned tragedy.  Especially one they consider as being easily exploitable in their effort to accomplish something that has long been very near and dear to their hearts.  That being, of course, their continuing effort to bring an end to the Second Amendment.  It’s already been a number of Democrats who have nearly tripped all over themselves in their rush to be the first to get to a microphone, or television camera, to express both their outrage and their supposed frustration over what they describe as being an epidemic of gun violence such as the recent shooting which took place in Parkland, Florida.

All of which brings me to one of the more despicable, unscrupulous and hypocritical members of the Democrat Party, none other than Chris Murphy, one of the senators who represents that bastion of leftwing lunacy, Connecticut.  You see, it was during a speech he gave from there on the Senate floor, and on the very same day as this terrible shooting, that Murphy demonstrated what has become the typical reaction by members of his party as he commented on the school shooting in Florida.  He claimed that Congress’ “inaction” is “responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He said, “As we speak, there is a horrific scene playing out at a high school in south Florida.”

And it was from there that he went on to say, “Turn on your television right now, you’re going to see scenes of children running for their lives, what looks to be the 19th school shooting in this country, and we have not even hit March. I’m coming to the floor to talk about something else, but let me just note, once again for my colleagues, that this happens nowhere else, other than the United States of America. This epidemic of mass slaughter, this scourge of school shooting after school shooting. It only happens here, not because of coincidence, not because of bad luck, but as a consequence of our inaction.”  Yup, old Chris proceeded to pull out all the stops in his effort to make as much hay as possible from the death of children.  Pretty sick!

But still he went on to say, “We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He continued, “As a parent, it scares me to death that this body doesn’t take seriously the safety of my children, and it seems like a lot of parents in south Florida are going to be asking that same question later today. We pray for the families and for the victims. We hope for the best.”  What this guy is truly praying for is that this most recent tragedy can be portrayed as being horrific enough by him and his fellow Democrats, as well as their allies in the state-controlled media, that they will finally be able to make some measurable progress in removing guns from the hands of law abiding citizens.

But the true insanity in all of this has to do with the fact that we continue to insist upon maintaining our public schools as “gun free’ zones.  How absolutely ludicrous is that?  And it is the very same politicians who preach to us about gun violence and who advocate for ever-stricter gun laws who stand in the way of us being allowed to protect our children.  And why do you suppose that is?  Well only one thing comes to my mind.  They’re simply using our children as bait.  We’re already finding out there were all manner of warning signs out there about this latest shooter, and yet he was still walking around.  What other explanation can there possibly be other than that certain politicians were actually hoping that something like this would happen?

You see, it’s those who strongly favor the creation of stricter gun control laws who are also the ones who remain confident that if they can only manage to get enough of our children killed then maybe it will become all that much easier for them to apply enough pressure to those evil supporters of the Second Amendment in the hope of forcing them to give up on their silly notion of being able to protect themselves and their families.  And it’s this very same leftist cast of characters, who continually go around claiming that it’s we conservatives who are the ones with blood on our hands because of our support of the National Rifle Association (NRA), who are actually the ones most responsible for tragedies such as this shooting in Florida.

Let’s face it, there’s nothing Democrats won’t do in their quest for power and they really don’t care how many bodies pile up as a direct result of their political agenda.  Actually, the higher the body count goes the better they like it, whether we talking about gun violence, terrorism or anything else that creates an opportunity that can then be exploited to the fullest.  And we all know that their motto is, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  However, when it comes to their drive for gun control Democrats seem quite willing to never let a dead child go to waste.  And remember the words of Democrat ‘Fast Eddie’ Rendell, when speaking about the Sandy Hook school shooting.  You know, when he said the good thing about Newtown was that it was so horrific.

And let’s also remember that the Democrat Party is the very same political party whose members very loudly support the Black Lives Matter movement as they advocate for more cops to be assassinated.  What we have here is a very purposeful Marxist attempt to disarm Americans.  When it was made a crime to spank your kids and kids were encouraged to report being yelled at at home, or other such hanging offenses, the left essentially took away those time-tested forms of building good citizens with a sense of respect and discipline.  What we have now, for the most part, is what results from letting a village raise your kids.  Hey, here’s a nutty idea.  Instead of focusing on guns, how about we put Jesus back in our schools.

Look, we all know how Democrats seek to politicize ‘everything.’  They create a climate of hate and then blame others when shit happens.  Remember when Murphy and many of his colleagues spoke on the senate floor and expressed outrage over the number of shooting deaths in Chicago?  Neither do I!  Here we have another cynical and duplicitous ploy from the Left to distract us from their hand in desensitizing our youth to violence, misogyny and general antisocial behavior via Hollyweird, social media, pornography, vulgar lyrics, obscene “art” etc.  Perhaps the Democrats would care to tell us how many mass school shootings we had in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s.  What’s been the biggest change in our society since then?  Rabid Progressivism!

And just a little something on a totally unrelated issue, the upcoming midterm elections, elections upon which so much will be riding.  I think it fair to say that the forces of darkness as now working very hard to marshal their forces, possessing what is a certain level of confidence in being able to ride a wave of dissatisfaction regarding President Trump.  Now say what you will about him, but I am very confident in saying that, economically speaking, the president very much now has this country headed in the right direction.  And if we should be foolish enough to hand control of Congress back to Schumer and Pelosi, it would prove difficult for the president to keep them from heading us right back into the ditch.  So please keep that in mind.

DEMOCRAT HYPOCRISY THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF VIDEOTAPE…

903

I think it’s pretty safe to say that were it not for the ‘miracle’ of videotape, there would be very little chance that we would ever come to know just how corrupt, dishonest and blatantly hypocritical many of our politicians truly are.  Their penchant for lying to us, and while looking us squarely in the eye, becomes all the more clear whenever it is that we can “go to the videotape!”  I’m sure we’ve all seen the many examples of their misconduct, which, obviously, would be far too numerous to try to list here.  But we certainly shouldn’t be all that surprised anymore.

And yet another, and most recent, example of this historical hypocrisy that has now come to light is one that originated back in 1993 when it was that a much less haggard looking Dianne Feinstein made the rather bold declaration that America could no longer afford to be Mexico’s welfare state, and that the U.S. should only accommodate legal immigrants.  And it was also back then that Ms. Feinstein acknowledged that Mexico does not provide its citizens the host of expensive entitlements available in the U.S.  But these days she sees things differently.

But it was back in 1993 that she said, “In Mexico, there is no welfare, there is no AFDC, there is no SSI, there is no Medicaid, there is no Social Security, there is no Medicare, and there is a 58 cent an hour minimum wage.”  And it was then that she was able to admit that the U.S. simply can’t afford to be Mexico’s welfare state.  She went on to say, “It is my view that, if we are going to have a North America Free Trade Agreement, that Mexico must do its share – because the day when America could be the welfare system for Mexico is gone. We simply can’t afford it.”

Feinstein said, “And, I think you’ve seen the figures, to state and local governments, of what the cost is. It’s over two billion dollars in California alone. And, I have those figures, if you want them, in specific, in my purse.”  America couldn’t even afford the then-two million illegal aliens in the country, Feinstein said 25 years ago, so the U.S. should solely focus on caring for people legally in the country.  She said, “And that’s why the issue is now joined with two million illegal immigrants.”  Which kind of makes one wonder what has changed since she uttered these words.

Anyway, Feinstein then went on to say, “It’s a competition for space. Whether the space is a job, the space is a home, a place in a classroom, it becomes a competition for space. This is a country that’s based on immigration. And we all know that.”  She said, “And yet, at times you become so overtaxed you have to concentrate on saying, ‘The people who should be here are those who come legally at this time.’”  And added, “And we’ve got to, for the time being, enforce our borders.”  And yet today enforcing our borders is the last thing that she wants to see happen.

Whenever a Democrat changes their position on an issue, especially an issue that can be viewed as being intensely political, we’re told that their position has somehow ‘evolved’.  Remember Barry’s views on gay marriage ‘evolved?  But when a Republican changes their position, the media always portrays them as liars.  Barry lied directly to the American people about his views on gay marriage in 2008, and then his position on the issue ‘evolved.’  Like all good Democrats their views depend upon what the various popularity polls are telling them that particular day.

Now being that it has been 25 long years since Ms. Feinstein was heard expressing her support for what can be described as commonsense immigration policy, I can’t help but wonder, now at the ripe old age of 84, if she can still remember ever uttering those words or if she has long ago forgotten that she ever did?  Because her position on the matter today is so far removed from what she was advocating for back in 1993.  But, I’m thinking the Democrat Party was in a far better place than what it finds itself in today.  Thus the need to move ever farther to the left.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that it’s all about pandering for votes, playing identity politics and choosing whichever “oppressed people” that are the cause of the week.  The Democrats (and unfortunately far too many Republicans are beginning to play the same game) have no actual core beliefs anymore, it’s only about what will get them the most votes in their drive to first gain and then to maintain political power as a party.  The need for term limits becomes more apparent with each new Congress.  While it wouldn’t solve all of our problems, it would certainly help.

Lastly, we do not owe anything to the Mexican/Latino people. They need to fix their own problems in their own country, not capitalize on how best to access our benefits by coming here illegally and instantly qualifying for all manner of ‘freebies’ the cost of which is left to the U.S. taxpayer to cover.  At the rate we’ve been going, under Barry’s “free handouts/DACA” system, America would have sunk like the Titanic in just a few years.  Hopefully, we now have a president who will follow through on the promises he made to fix the massive hole in our sinking ship.

AND NOW MORE INSANITY FROM THE LAND OF THE FRUITS, THE NUTS AND THE FLAKES…

De Niro 5

Never in my life have I witnessed a group of individuals more eager to prove just how little they know about everything, than our current batch of celebrities.  And stranger still, than the fact that they continue to present themselves as being some sort of authorities on whatever the subject may be, is the fact that they are actually accepted as such by those our state-controlled news media and even touted as being some sort of scientific experts.  This despite the fact that they have no special training, education, or insight regarding such things as so-called ‘climate change.’

Which brings me to something that I recently saw being reported on Fox News.  Apparently, actor and well-known expert on all things considered to be scientific, Bobby De Niro, already well-established as being someone who is no friend of President Donald Trump, gave a speech, for some bizarre reason, this past Sunday at the ‘World Government Summit’ in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.  And it was during this idiotic little speech that Bobby dismissed the Trump administration’s position on ‘climate change’ as “backward” and “a case of temporary insanity.”

Bobby was commenting on remarks from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Chief Scott Pruitt, who suggested last week that there may be an upside for mankind in global warming.  It was during a recent interview that Pruitt said, “We know humans have most flourished during times of warming trends. There are assumptions made that because the climate is warming that necessarily is a bad thing.”  And he added, “Do we know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100 or year 2018? It’s fairly arrogant for us to think we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

Bobby apparently found this attitude triggering.  He said, “I am talking about my own country, the United States of America. We don’t like to say we are a ‘backward’ country so let’s just say we are suffering from a case of temporary insanity.”  Bobby drew applause and laughter when he told the audience at the Summit that America “will eventually cure itself by voting our dangerous leader” out of office.  Actually, America will begin to cure itself regarding its strange affection for leftist insanity when we stop paying any amount of attention to pathetic old losers like Bobby.

I must say that I am more than a little curious as to why anyone in their right mind would ever waste their time listening to this guy who couldn’t even make it beyond his high school freshman year.  And despite that fact, because he’s ‘Bobby’ D., he thinks that sufficient for him to lecture the rest of us on all matters scientific and that we need to heed what he says.  But the massive amount of what Bobby doesn’t know is staggering. Maybe he should shut his pie hole, and stick to pretentiously method acting his way through the same movie role over and over again.

And think about it: the two loudest and most obnoxious ‘climate change’ cult celebrities in all of Hollyweird, Bobby De Niro and Lenny DiCaprio, are both high school dropouts.  Just stop for a minute and let that sink in.  Then the next thing you need to ponder is, is something that has so captivated the left, really something that the rest of us really need to be all that concerned about?  I mean, here we have two of the most clueless individuals on the planet, sounding the alarm about something that they know absolutely nothing about, and we’re supposed to take them seriously.

And how about we all agree to just call the ‘climate change’ “Paris Accord” exactly what it is.  Another method by which the globalist progressive minded elites plan to steal more dollars from hard working, tax paying American’s.  The goal here, of course, is to weaken the people while simultaneously forcing more and more of us into a greater dependence on big government.  Yes that’s correct, true motivations of epic proportions all hidden behind the facade of some ominous, albeit quite bogus, catastrophe.  And they nearly got away with it, if not for Hitlery losing the election.

Now I know Bobby, has every right to remain just as clueless as he wishes to be, however he also has the obligation to be a bit better informed.  I often wonder if any of these propaganda spewing celebrities, like Bobby, actually believe any of what they say, or if it’s all just some sort of silly charade, the motive of which I’m not quite sure.  Because I’m sure that Bobby refuses to use cars and airplanes, preferring instead to bike everywhere that he goes.  As well, I’m sure he avoids such things as central heat and air.  Just like all virtue-signaling, ‘green’, limousine liberals.  Right?