Trump 30

When it comes to what we commonly refer to today as our ‘state-controlled media’ I think most reasonably intelligent people are able to agree that this group of various organizations who while they may all like to call themselves ‘news’ organizations are in truth nothing more that creators of fiction, or “fake news”, that is always, or nearly always, focused solely in the direction of one political party.  And it’s many of these organizations, some of which have been around for a very long time, that have over time come to much more closely resemble purveyors of what is little more than pure political propaganda.  And as such they have essentially abandoned the American people who have now been left with an ever shrinking number of reliable sources willing to provide to them accurate and useful information.  As proof of that I would only ask if anyone genuinely believes that Barack Obama, the color of his skin notwithstanding, would have ever been elected president if those in our supposed ‘mainstream media’ had actually done their job and reported accurately when it came to exactly who this man was at the time.

And in reviewing the events that took place over the course of our most recent presidential campaign, who can deny the fact that it was this very same group of ‘news’ organizations that attempted to do everything within its ‘power’ to sway voter opinion and to create the false impression that the candidate they were so obviously supporting was nothing more invincible and her election was inevitable.  It would seem that their game plan was, through the use of bogus polls and patently false ‘news’ stories, to advance the notion that there was simply no way she could possibly lose and doing so in the hope that they would be able to convince enough of those who supported her opponent that theirs was a lost cause and that they might just as well stay home on Election Day.  They were determined to let nothing stand in the way of their effort to convince voters that she was without a doubt the most qualified person to ever run for president, and certainly more qualified than was her opponent who they portrayed as a mere novice when it came to such important matters as international relations, national defense and terrorism.

But as we all saw on Election Day, all of their hard work was, thankfully, all for naught because their favored candidate, the one they had tried so very hard to get elected, the one they had tried so hard to convince the American people was the best person for the job, came up short.  And while they persist, to this day, in their claim that she did win the ‘popular vote’ it’s always that they very conveniently leave out of their argument that the ‘only’ reason she was even able to accomplish that feat was all because of one state, California.  So once the loss of their candidate was confirmed it was almost immediately after that that the search to come up with what could then be used as a plausible excuse for the loss was launched.  Because there had to some sinister, some clandestine reason, some sort of foul play involved, to explain why their perfect candidate somehow came up short.  Because there could be no other reason that could possibly explain her loss.  They honestly wondered who it was that could not bring themselves to vote for such an highlyly qualified candidate.  Yet, millions of Americans did not!

So immediately after their candidate was declared the loser it became necessary, I guess, for those who felt that they had somehow been robbed of a victory because of some sort of shenanigans, was to come up with some sort retaliatory measures, or a Plan ‘B’ so to speak, that could then be implemented against the new president in order to undermine, to the greatest extent possible, his ability to properly execute the duties of his job.  Once the plan was properly formulated, it didn’t take long for all the players to get onboard.  So there now continues what can only be described as a very coordinated effort between members of the Democrat Party and their many minions in the ‘state-controlled’ media to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump.  And it would seem to matter very little to them that despite having no facts or evidence to support any of their wild claims they continue to spew all manner of accusations the purpose of which is to destroy our president.  And it is out of some genuine concern for our country that they seek to remove our president?  No, it’s all about revenge, and nothing more.

Which brings to what I’m quite sure everyone is by now very familiar with as being the latest dustup involving the president and his decision to fire the Director of the FBI.  And as part of the ongoing campaign to unseat our duly elected president it was just this week that we had the Washington Post and the New York Times acting as partners in crime as they each published new versions of the story of how former FBI director James Comey came to be fired.  Each of the articles, published late Wednesday, seeks to explain more details about how President Trump arrived at his decision, and each aims to catch the White House in alleged contradictions between its official account of how the decision was made, and how it actually happened.  Now as is usually the case whenever dealing with any of these promotors of “fake news”, a certain degree of trepidation is always required.  One should always take anything that they may say with a significant grain of salt.  Truth is something that seems to be in very short supply whenever you’re dealing with anyone in either the Democrat Party or the ‘state-controlled. Media.

Anyway, it was the Post story that characterized Trump’s decision as a “sudden” one, driven by “anger and impatience,” and by a desire to stop the FBI’s investigation into supposed connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. The Post says that President Trump initiated a meeting with Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his deputy, Rod Rosenstein — not the other way around. It portrays them as anxious to fulfill “the boss’s orders,” and suggests that Trump felt events were “spiraling out of his control.” Perhaps the most startling claim is that Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey.” The Post relies on a single source — “a person close to the White House” for that rather sensational claim. Interestingly, the Post story also portrays the testimony of former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates on Monday as damaging to the White House — although there were no new details revealed about the Russia investigation.

Meanwhile, the Times story is a bit more circumspect, saying Trump’s decision on Comey had less to do with fear of the Russia investigation and more with irritation at Comey’s political grandstanding. The article claims, “He was particularly irked when Mr. Comey said he was ‘mildly nauseous’ to think that his handling of the email case had influenced the election, which Mr. Trump took to demean his own role in history.”  Curiously, the Times story claims that White House adviser Steve Bannon was a dissenting voice — which contradicted earlier speculation by a Times reporter. The Times does not go as far as the Post in concluding that Trump initiated the Department of Justice review that led to Comey’s firing, leaving the order of events a bit more vague and including the White House’s explanation.  The two accounts agree that there was near-unanimity in the White House about firing Comey, and that the White House was surprised by the public backlash. Neither suggests an imminent FBI breakthrough on the Russia probe.

Operating under the Watergate template, and salivating over the prospects of a similar conclusion, those in our state-controlled media will likely endeavor to suggest that “the cover-up was worse than the crime”, even though there has been no cover-up, and no evidence of any crime.  What these leftwing zealots fail to grasp is that ”We the People” now pay very little attention to them and that we now consider them as being little more than the propaganda arm if the Democrat Party.  And of course what I’m referring to is anyone once referred to as the ‘mainstream media’.  But as most of us are now aware, sadly there is very little about abut modern day media complex that can, in any way, be described as “mainstream.”  They keep trying to tell us what to think not realizing we’ve moved beyond them.  There’s no direct evidence that Trump has any ties to Russia, yet the media has a hysterical obsession.  Yet there are stacks of evidence that Hitlery committed numerous felonies with respect to her email and secret information which the media couldn’t care less about.  And yet, there isn’t any bias, and no, they aren’t ‘fake news.’

Our ‘fake news’ organizations have spent more time on this non-scandal scandal than they spent on all of Barry’s bona fide scandals combined.  Remember the Benghazi massacre where four Americans dead, including the US Ambassador, Obama’s War in Libya WITHOUT Congressional approval, the great “stimulus” “shovel-ready” heist, Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress, the IRS Targeting Scandal with the destruction and wiping of servers and Lois Lerner’s testimony, ‘Fast and Furious’, the GSA scandal, the lies and deceit of ObamaCare, the Iran nuclear deal and ransom payment, the EPA Cover-up of the pollution of the Colorado River, the VA death-list scandal, Barry’s “Red Line” in the sand to Syria, and refusal to back it up which helped destroy US credibility, Hitlery’s e-mail’s and her Secret, Unsecured Server, Hitlery’s RUSSIAN Uranium deal, ‘Slick’ and Hitlery’s Foundation – Pay for Play, ‘Slick’s’ meeting Loretta Lynch on the Phoenix Tarmac days before Comey reveals his findings and conclusions about the Hitlery e-mail scandal, Barry holdovers illegally leaking the names of Trump associates to the press, and the list goes on!

So here we are seven months into the Trump presidency and still ZERO evidence of any collusion with Russia.  Zip, Zero, Zilch, Nadda!  We know that Trump didn’t collude with Russia, because if any evidence had been found our supposed ‘news’ would have wasted no time in making sure that it became a big problem for the president.  And yet nothing but silence and admissions that they have nothing.  Still I can’t understand how anyone would ever think that Russia would rather have someone like Trump over someone like Hitlery, on whom they likely possess all manner of blackmail ammunition.  So I find myself wondering how many of my fellow Americans remain able to take seriously any of these politicians and ‘journalists’ who are so very obviously suffering from what is a most severe case of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’.  These people have now allowed themselves to become so consumed by such a level of hatred they come across as sounding completely insane.  And how does their bizarre behavior convince those who may disagree with them that what they’re claiming is anything other than some crazy leftwing conspiracy?



It’s getting to be where every time I see some Democrat on television it’s becoming more and more difficult to take them seriously.  Most are now sounding borderline psychotic.  And the fact that at least some of these people are in positions of power should cause every American, regardless of party affiliation, to be more than a little uneasy to say the least.  Never have I seen so many people, come so unraveled, and remain that way for so long, over losing an election.  It’s all become so very bizarre.  These Democrats have now reduced themselves to being little more than a parody of their former selves.  Every time I see Chuckie Schumer or that other nutbag, Maxine Waters, I want to laugh but can’t because the danger people like them have now come to represent is quite unnerving.

Which brings me to the most recent event to cause nearly the entire Democrat Party to move just that much closer to the edge.  That being, of course, the firing of James Comey, by President Trump, which occurred just yesterday.  So just days after testifying before Congress with news that Hitlery aide Mrs. Anthony Weiner had shared classified e-mails with her then-still-husband, Comey got that ax.  White House press secretary Sean Spicer said, “The president has accepted the recommendation of the attorney general and the deputy attorney general regarding the dismissal of the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”  End of story!  The firing will be good news for Trump voters who elected him to “drain the swamp” and they will no doubt be asking what took him so long.

And just to add a little perspective here, it was Chuck Schumer, back in November, who told Bloomberg that he no longer had confidence in the abilities of Comey following his decision to reopen an investigation into Hitlery’s emails.  It was then that he said, “I do not have confidence in him any longer.”  And he added, “To restore my faith, I am going to have to sit down and talk to him and get an explanation for why he did this.”  And it was Nancy Pelosi who told CNN, also back in November, that he was no longer suited to the position of FBI Director.  And again is was following Comey’s reopening of Hitlery’s email investigation that she said, “Maybe he’s not in the right job.”  Going on to say, “I think that we have to just get through this election and just see what the casualties are along the way.”

And then we had former Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders who told ABC’s ‘This Week’ as recently as this past January that in his opinion Comey should consider resigning having acted in an “outrageous way” during the presidential election.  Bernie said, “I think he should take a hard look at what he has done. And I think it would not be a bad thing for the American people if he did step down.”  And it was he who went on to say, “I think that Comey acted in an outrageous way during the campaign and, you know, no one can say that this was decisive and this was what elected Trump, but clearly his behavior during the campaign in terms of what he said in the week or two before the election was unacceptable.”  So the hypocrisy of those on the left becomes all too difficult to simply ignore.

I think we can all agree that the reputation of the FBI first started circling the drain back in the early 1990s when Louis Freeh decided to hand over to Hitlery and ‘The Slickmeister’ hundreds of confidential FBI files, aka ‘Filegate’.  And it has been going downhill, and pretty steadily, ever since.  And let’s get real here, shall we?  The only reason that the Democrats now have their panties in such a wad is because they have now have one less stooge working for them on the inside.  Comey has been an embarrassment to the FBI and to law enforcement in general for some time.  In truth Comey is a longtime member of the ‘Clinton Crime Syndicate’ going all the way back to when ‘Slick Willy’ was the governor.  He’s essentially the ONLY reason the Clinton’s didn’t go to prison during their White Water scandal.

And it is a fact that it was more than a few FBI agents who had come to have zero confidence in Comey.  How could they, after he essentially let Hitlery go because there was no “intent?”  And after he created what was a class of aristocracy essentially “above the law?”  And the timing could not have been more perfect.  Trump waited until Comey had discredited himself beyond any question, and then he fired him.  That’s how it’s done.  No one can call Trump a dictator running a purge, although the media and Democrats will certainly try.  We are in the middle of a minefield that took decades to lay, and it’s going to take more than 100, 200 or even 1460 days to dismantle it so future generations will not be forced to contend with it.  And the Democrats will continue to yelp like the scalded dogs that they are as we work to do just that.

And those on the left continue to spin and so fast I can no longer keep up.  I mean does the left not like Comey and he think he should be gone because he lost Hitlery the presidency or is it that the left loves Comey and firing him is wrong because of a Trump investigation that’s going nowhere?  I’m so confused. First they blamed Comey for Hitlery’s defeat in the election, but now he will become their martyr as they continue their attempts to undermine Trump.  The left is so used to keeping people on the job who do nothing but to continually fail the country.  In the real world, if you don’t do your job, you’re replaced or fired.  Sooner or later, you replace a worn out tire and put on a new one.  Plain and simple, President Trump is going to work and Comey can’t protect Democrats anymore, and especially Hitlery.

And in trying to wrap things up I would just like to mention, although I’m sure I’m likely to be stating the obvious, that if it had been Barry who had been the one to fire Comey, not a peep would have been heard from a single Democrat, and there is not one who would have been critical of the decision.  And then you have those in the Republican Party, our cadre of ‘establishment’ RINOs who will do anything to get those in the state-controlled media to like them.  If only they would instead choose to show a little discipline, and maybe a little backbone.  The state-controlled media only loves them when they are attacking their own, and will never support them against the Democrats.  You’d have thought the McCain example would have been a valuable lesson learned, but even McCain himself seems to have learned nothing.

And all of these RINO’s now choosing to join the Democrats in taking sides against the president are really nothing more than Democrats in Republican clothing.  And as we all know, RINOs are, as RINOs do.  They’re just a pathetic bunch of backstabbing, power tripping, ankle biting, media whores.  And the biggest whore of the entire bunch, aka the Democrat’s official Republican mouth-piece, is none other than John McCain who can now be heard calling for a Special Prosecutor, which is exactly what the Democrats really want.  Maybe we should have that ‘special prosecutor’ look into what has been McCain’s way too long political career.  That might prove to be far more interesting than anything President Trump has ever done!  After all, we know he’s not exactly the war hero he’s always portrayed himself as being.

And I must say that I agree 100 percent with all those who view our Republicans in Congress, or at least the majority of them, as being the biggest bunch of gutless wonders ever elected to public office, at any level.  They fight for absolutely nothing.  Their biggest concern is doing all that they can in their effort to keep the Democrats from calling them racist and bigoted, so they cave on nearly everything.  I am predicting a lot of new faces in the Republican after 2018.  And if there are not then we the voters really are as stupid as the Democrats and RINOs think we are.  No matter what you may think of Trump the main focus come 2018 must not be to elect anymore Democrats.  The focus must be on replacing as many RINOs as we can in the House and every RINO that’s up for re-election in the Senate, with conservatives.  That’s the fix that we need.

And finally if it’s the timing of Comey’s firing that seems to have old Chuckie Schumer and so many of his fellow Democrats so wrapped around the axle, then let me help them all out.  You want timing, ok Chuckie, here’s your damn timing:

  1. Trump elected and he knew then that Comey had to go.
  2. He wanted this decision to come from Comey’s new boss, the yet-to-be approved DOJ, Jeff Sessions.
  3. Sessions is approved but under intense political pressure must recuse himself regarding the high profile ongoing case being investigated by Comey, and couldn’t fire Comey without backlash.
  4. Rosenstein is appointed and approved as Asst. DOJ.
  5. Trump asks Sessions to give Rosenstein the job of evaluating Comey and to then make recommendations.
  6. Rosenstein finishes his evaluation and recommends firing Comey.
  7. BOOM. Done deal.
  8. Hitlery and friends begin to crap in their diapers
  9. Grand jury is finally convened
  10. Indictments are issued

There’s your timing, Chuckie.  Are you and your merry band of hypocrites happy now?  Now all we need is a little follow through regarding 8, 9 and 10.  Let’s make that happen!



Now you would think that if there is one thing that the American people would have learned from their decision to elect Barack Hussein Obama, not once but twice, as their 44th president, it would be that they should never vote for someone whose background the media has worked so very hard to keep hidden from them out of fear that may cause them not to vote for that candidate.  The reason being, nothing good will come of it.  And for proof that we need look back no further than the elections of 2008 and 2012.  After all, what exactly did our state-controlled media do in an effort to make sure that the voting public was aware of who this man, Obama, really was.  So  I thought it a bit ironic that after a speech he gave, just yesteday, in Milan, Italy, that during a question-and-answer session after the speech, Barry seemed to toss a bit if a dig at people who didn’t show up to the polls last November.

And it was without mentioning President Trump by name that Barry said, “You get the politicians you deserve.”  And he added, “And if you don’t vote and you don’t participate and you don’t pay attention, then you’ll get policies that don’t reflect your interests.”  The comments came during a discussion about leadership, a trait which Barry has repeatedly demonstrated that he most definitely does not possess.  And yet, Barry said, “The mark of a good leader is somebody who is able to empower other people.”  He then went on to say, “So often we think of leadership as somebody at the top who is ordering other people around … but it turns out, for me at least, what made me understand leadership was when I could see somebody who thought they didn’t have a voice, thought they didn’t have influence or didn’t have power, and teach them how to speak up on the things that were affecting their lives.”

Barry said, “Politicians can help guide policy.”  And he then went on to say, “But change is going to come from what people do every day.”  He said, “When I was president, wherever I would go, I would meet with young people.”  And he went on to say, “And it would always give me energy and inspiration to see how much talent and sophistication and optimism and idealism existed among young people.”  Barry continued, saying, “The problem is so often young people’s voices aren’t heard, and when they want to get involved on issues, they don’t know how and they don’t have the tools.”  So it is then that the apparent goal of the forthcoming Barry “Almighty” Presidential Center is “to provide them the tools, the training, the networks, the relationships, the funding, so that they can be even more effective. That’s probably what I’m going to be spending most of the next 10 years on.”

You would think that it would be pretty difficult, for all but the most devoted of his followers, to deny that over the course of his entire time in office Barry proved himself to be anything other than a complete disgrace, as well as being not much of an actual leader.  I can’t help but wonder what other freedom loving people must have thought of us for electing this guy?  I’m sure they must have thought that we had lost of collective mind.  And then when we chose to re-elected him, I’m sure they thought we had gone completely insane.  And still, to this day, the majority of Americans don’t agree with his policies.  So he was actually telling us the truth when he said you get what you deserve by not voting because when the working men and women in America didn’t vote we got the most divisive, race baiting President in US history. It’s sad at how he is now profiting ‘bigly’ by spreading his divisive rhetoric.

The truth is that Barry would have lost the first time if he had been truthful about who, and what, he “really believed.”  But for those of us who were really listening, we knew what Barry really believed.  There just wasn’t enough of us, so what we ended up with was a narcissist for eight years who seemed quite determined in his effort to destroy our country.  You end up with whoever you vote, or don’t vote, for.  Because in 2008 how many folks chose to stay home instead of voting for McCain, and how many did the same in 2012 because they couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Romney?  Therefore what we ended up with was a guy who couldn’t pour piss out of a boot with the directions on the heel.  So in that way Barry is right because in both instances we got what we deserved.  And has anyone else ever noticed that the word ‘incompetent’ and Barack Obama both have the same number of letters?  Just saying.

But what the Hell did I do to deserve Barry for eight years!  I went out and I voted for both McCain and Romney.  And still I ended up with a narcissistic, self-centered, self-serving hypocrite.  And I voted for Trump because I want to see a roll-back of big government, and less coddling of those unwilling to work, or to think for themselves. And I’m in favor of reviving that antiquated notion of following the law, i.e., sanctuary cities are nonsense, and if you came to this country illegally, you don’t deserve to be here ahead of those who followed the rules and paid their fees.  And did any of us get what we deserved when we elected Barry?  Did we deserve $20 Trillion in debt?  Did we deserve healthcare that we can’t afford to use?  Did we deserve more racial division?  Did we deserve to have our jobs go overseas?  We also don’t deserve now to be scolded by you because we voted for change, Barry.

Barry is the reason Trump was elected, because had there been no Barry, I firmly believe there would have been no President Trump.  And Trump’s success is a direct result of Barry and his radically left-wing policies. It remains to be seen what kind of positive impact the new president can have, in spite of the Democrats, but working to unravel much of the social engineering by his predecessor would be a great start.  But we now know that there were many last ditch efforts by Barry which were knee jerk responses to Hitlery’s losing the election.  And we now know that much of what Barry did as he headed toward the exit was designed to keep Trump busy early on so he would be unsuccessful. Like many on his team, Barry underestimated the pace the new president has kept.  With the election of President Trump we have moved beyond the worst president in American history.  And now we need put him further behind us!


Obama 04

Apparently Barry no longer feels that he can just sit idly by and watch as much of his ‘legacy’ is now being made to go up in smoke.  I say that because it was while at the John F. Kennedy Library to accept, of all things, the annual Profile in Courage Award, that Barry implored members of Congress to have what he described as the “courage” not to repeal the Affordable Care Act Sunday night.  It was in making his first public remarks since leaving the White House that Barry choose to talk about the proposed health care legislation just days after House Republicans voted to pass the measure 217 to 213.  And if we can believe any of what we’re being told, if passed by the Senate it would come to effectively ‘repeal and replace’ at least major parts of Obamacare.  That said, it’s far less then what I hoped for.

But anyway, Barry said, “As everyone here now knows, this great debate is not settled, but continues.”  And he went on to say, “It is my fervent hope, and the hope of millions, that regardless of party, such courage is still possible. That today’s members of Congress, regardless of party, are willing to look at the facts and speak the truth, even when it contradicts party positions.”  And he continued, “I hope that current members of Congress recall that it actually doesn’t take a lot of courage to aid those that are already powerful, already comfortable, already influential, but it does require some courage to champion the vulnerable, and the sick, and the infirmed.”  Adding, “Those who often have no access to the corridors of power.”  That said, I honestly don’t remember there being much of a debate back in 2010.

And as something we all became quite accustomed to over the eight long years that we were forced to endure his pompous self, Barry can be rather long winded, especially when talking about himself, or in this case about his ‘legacy’.  And as to be expected Barry laid it on thick as he went on to say, “I hope they understand that courage means not simply doing what’s politically expedient, but doing what, deep in our hearts, we know is right.”  He said, “I have said before that I believe what Dr. King said — that the arc of the moral universe bends, but it bends towards justice. I have also said that it does not bend on its own, but it bends because we bend it, and we put our hand on the arc and we move it in the direction of justice and freedom and equality and kindness and generosity. It does not happen on its own.”

And it was during his speech that Barry lauded those Democrat members of Congress who voted in favor of Obamacare in 2010 and then lost their seats because of it.  And it was of them that he said, “These men and women did the right thing, the hard thing, and theirs was a profile in courage, and because of that vote, 20 million people got health insurance that didn’t have it before.”  But you’ll notice that he mentioned nothing about the sleazy tactics that Democrats used in their effort to get this legislation to his desk.  Nor was there any mention made of the millions who were not able to keep their doctor, even though they liked their doctor, or those who could not keep their insurance, even if they liked their insurance, unless, of course, they were somehow able to afford the massive increases in both premiums and deductibles.

It has become pretty common knowledge, at least among those of us outside of the Democrat Party, that Obamacare has been proven to be nothing more than an abject failure.  I mean, where is all the evidence to support the claims that it is working effectively for anybody not already on the government dole?  And to make the claim that those who voted for Obamacare, and were then subsequently voted out of office, “did the right thing, the hard thing, and theirs was a profile in courage”, is to be plainly ignorant and patently dishonest.  These people didn’t even know what was in the bill, how can that ever be spun to say they did the right thing for the right reasons?  They sold their vote to defraud the American people out of the market for private health insurance, that’s what Obamacare has always been about.

And as the nation’s first black president, and coming into office holding a fair amount of promise, Barry essentially ended up being little more than a political thug of rather epic proportions, and was able to set race relations back 100 years almost single handedly.  And while I never voted for him, it was after he won in 2008 that I had genuinely hoped that he would take it upon himself to put country above his leftist politics.  But call me naïve, I really should have known better.  After all he did say that he would be working to “fundamentally transform” America.  And sadly, it was in pretty short order, assisted by his majorities in the Senate and House, that he set about doing just that!  In 2012 my expectations were much lower as what took place during his first four years made it obvious what his second four years would bring.

After all, it’s the simple truth is that Democrats need massive government dependency in order to thrive and that they are also the party of slavery, of lynching, of discrimination, of segregation and of the Ku Klux Klan.  And the sad fact is that they still are the party of slavery and oppression, and just because the chains are no longer visible it doesn’t mean that they don’t still exist.  And oddly, the effective head of the Democrat plantation remains, a black man.  And while our state-controlled media will continue to get down on their knees and carry his water, he’s become irrelevant in the minds of a majority of Americans.  But I must give the Democrats credit for going down with their ship, but it’s now been left to the rest of us try to salvage whatever it is that’s left and to rebuild up from that.

And I find it sad that, and practically since Election Day, Barry has been busily scheming to do all that he can in what has clearly been an effort to sabotage Trump’s presidency.  It seems that Barry has now assembled himself an army of agitators, said to number more than 30,000, who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency.  And Barry will command them from his not-so-hidden bunker less than two miles from the White House.  Since Donald Trump’s election, Barry’s group, ‘Organizing for Action’, has beefed up staff and ramped up recruitment of young liberal activists, declaring on its website, “We’re not backing down.”  Determined to salvage Barry’s legacy, and his legislative priorities, it’s drawing battle lines on immigration, ObamaCare, race relations and climate change.

This latest speech was really nothing but more of the same political drivel that we heard nonstop from this guy for eight long years.  Just a bunch of soaring rhetoric and very little else.  And I noticed he’s still clinging to the 20 million number as having Obamacare.  And apparently his is unaware, so doesn’t care, that few can afford the rising rates and the fact that insurance companies have abandoned state after state.  There has always been a huge disconnect between our ex-president and all us ordinary folks.  The only area in which anyone can claim that Obamacare has been a success, is in the area of killing jobs.  Small businesses are what drive our economy, and it’s because of regulations created by Obamacare that they cannot afford to hire more people.  It’s 60 percent of small businesses that now want it repealed.

Barry’s policies could not have been more soundly rejected than they have been and by a broad range of people all across the country.  The Democrat Party has been pummeled in every election since 2010 and at every level of government.  And that’s why Trump won and Hitlery went down to defeat.  Barry put his reputation on the line in campaigning for Hitlery and warned the people what would happen if she lost.  People didn’t listen to him then and they’re not listening now.  He preaches only to his choir, the state-controlled media, leftist elitists from Hollywood and New York, supporters of illegal immigration, people with their hand out for more and more ‘free’ stuff, unions, anti-religion secularists, the list goes on and on.  I think we all knew that he wouldn’t be going away quietly, people like him never really do.


Warren 3

Melting down into a puddle of toxic goo quicker than did the ‘Wicked Witch of the West’  after Dorothy doused her with a bucket water, Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren let her feelings be known about the ‘supposed’ repeal of Obamacare that was officially begun in the House yesterday.  And in offering up no evidence whatsoever to support her idiotic claims, Warren said the Republicans’ Obamacare replacement bill that passed the House on Thursday will cause millions of Americans to die.  It was via a rather bizarre series of tweets on Thursday, following passage of the bill, that she warned, “Families will go bankrupt. People will die!”  Meanwhile, it was the non-partisan Manhattan Institute that did a little fact-checking about the claims that repealing Obamacare will kill Americans, a favorite accusation made by many Democrats, and found it unsupported by any evidence.

It was Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the institute who wrote, “The best statistical estimate for the number of lives saved each year by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is zero.”  And, he added, “Certainly, there are individuals who have benefited from various of its provisions. But attempts to claim broader effects on public health or thousands of lives saved rely upon extrapolation from past studies that focus on the value of private health insurance. The ACA, however, has expanded coverage through Medicaid, a public program that, according to several studies, has failed to improve health outcomes for recipients. In fact, public health trends since the implementation of the ACA have worsened, with 80,000 more deaths in 2015 than had mortality continued declining during 2014–15 at the rate achieved during 2000–2013.”  So there you have it.  Proof that what we get from folks like Warren, is just smoke and mirrors.

And so now I eagerly await to see how those purveyors of what has now become commonly referred to as “fake news”, such as those supposed ‘journalists’ at the Communist News Network (CNN), will go about the ‘reporting’ of Warren’s unsubstantiated, as well as blatantly dishonest, statement.  Reports which, I am quite sure, will be premised with qualifiers like “falsely”, “wrongly”, and “without any evidence.”  You know, just like they always do when they’re talking about President Trump.  Like that’s gonna happen.  Sadly, folks in our state-controlled media long ago lost any interest whatsoever in being viewed as a source of accurate and unbiased information.  These days they are proud to consider themselves as being part of the Democrat Party’s propaganda squad. Especially whenever an opportunity, real or imagined, to bash President Trump may present itself.  Or even if one doesn’t.

So Ms. Warren, how many people are dead because of Obamacare and for no other reason than because they were forced to sign up and then could afford to meet neither the rising premiums nor the high deductibles, deciding to forego treatment?  And remember folks, Hitlery was supposed to win and it was then that after a couple of years having her in the White House, Obamacare would have then morphed into the single payer healthcare system that Democrats have long been seeking.  Or as it is called in Canada, Britain, Australia, and everywhere else it’s been implemented, Socialized medicine.  Obamacare was a train wreck right out of the gate.  Remember how we were told if we liked our doctor, we could keep our doctor and how if we liked our insurance, we could keep our insurance?  It was all bullshit, and the folks telling us this, including our then president, KNEW it was bullshit!

And isn’t it interesting how it’s the exact same number of Americans, 24 million, that the CBO once claimed would be covered by Obamacare, that liberals are now using as the number of those who will lose their insurance even though the report didn’t mention anything about 24 million?   As is usually the case might they simply be parroting Nancy “We must pass it before we’re able to see what’s in it” Pelosi?  And why is it that on the same day it would be Time Magazine saying that only 14 million would lose coverage?  Is it because 24 million sounds so much more dramatic than 14 million?  Does the CBO report use the word “could” or “would” in their report?  Did the same CBO score Obamacare accurately in 2010?  Unlikely.  Is it true that only half as many people signed up for Obamacare for 2017 than the CBO projected?  And when was the last time the CBO score anything accurately?

Yes, maybe there will be people who may die because they don’t have Obamacare.  He folks, news flash!  There were millions of people who lost their insurance under Obamacare.  And, sadly, many of them died.  And many more, who will never be born, were not given the chance to live.  The CBO, the Democrats, and the ‘Man in the Moon’ can throw out any number they like and there are people who will gobble it up as ‘FACT’.  The real truth, here, is that no one can predict the future and what it will bring, but one thing is for sure.  Obamacare was a disaster that did nothing but try to collect more taxes from the ones who could least afford it and picked the insurance companies that the Democrats wanted to see succeed. They failed at that too.  The “non-partisan” CBO?  The same CBO that has been wrong on just about everything else over at least the last 8 years?

Obamacare was supposed to help anywhere from 20 million to 60 million Americans, depending on who was rolling out the numbers.  Except that, because there was an “opt out” plan in it by paying the tax, the numbers never materialized.  And somewhere along the line 20 to 30 million Americans lost their coverage because they had “sub-par” policies.  They could only get new policies by paying higher premiums, taking higher deductibles and submitting to the “one size fits all” policies, with coverage they would never need or use.  The dirty little secret is that liberals, including old Pocahontas, don’t care if people die.  Government programs like health care are merely a means to an end for the left.  Power and wealth is all they want.  They support the murder of hundreds of thousands of babies annually, but want you to believe they care about everyone else.

After decades of liberal policies being shoved down the throats of the people, nothing is as they claimed it would be.  Democrats still pretend they are the champion of poor people, while doing everything they can to create more of them.  Imagine how many people would die if the government was in complete control of our healthcare, especially the elderly.  My mom will be 86 years old this year and she tells me all the time how she thinks that the government doesn’t want all the old people around.  And with all her complaining on the subject, Warren, along with most of her liberal colleagues, have absolutely no knowledge or understanding of Obamacare and couldn’t care less about the impact it has come to have on millions of people. They didn’t even bother to read the bill before they shoved it down the throats of unsuspecting Americans. They’ve never been on Obamacare.

Obamacare is yet another government program designed in such a way as to actually discourage its use through excessive premiums and exorbitant deductibles.  And in what has become typical government fashion it sounds really good to say that you now have more people with insurance, but what good is having insurance when you can’t afford to use it.  Unless, of course, you’re some scum-sucking parasite, aka a Democrat voter, who ends up getting their shit for ‘free’!  This is maddening, and I seriously doubt that the legislation referred to as a “repeal” of Obamacare that was passed in the House this past Thursday will accomplish very much, if anything at all, in getting us back to allowing the American people access to quality healthcare for a ‘reasonable’ price.  And by ‘reasonable’ I mean less than what it now costs under Obamacare because of premiums and deductibles.



When looking from the outside in it’s easy to make the assumption that the Republican Party, at least within the confines of the Washington beltway, is far from having its act together.  As evidenced by its inability to make good on its promise to repeal and replace Obamacare and the passage of yet another wasteful spending bill that accomplishes nothing more than to grow the government.  Our problem, which is very much in need of being corrected come the 2018 election, is the fact that currently it’s only roughly 60 out of the 238 Republicans in the House that can in any way be considered as conservative.  And things are even worse over in the Senate.  But to make the claim that the Democrat Party is anything other than a party headed in multiple directions at the same time takes naïveté to a whole new level.

And it is none other than Nancy Pelosi, who I can only assume must be suffering from what can only be described as a rather severe case denial, who refuses to acknowledge just how severely fractured her Democrat Party truly is.  And it was when she was recently asked by ABC’s Jonathan Karl to grade the Democrats during the first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s administration, Pelosi responded, “In terms of unity, 100 percent unified.”  To which Karl shot back asking her, “Two-thirds of the American people say the Democratic Party is out of touch … Isn’t the Democratic Party a bit of a mess right now?”  Pelosi responded, “No, it isn’t.”  However, there are those within her party, and even in the left leaning state-controlled media, willing to point out just how divided the Democrats are.

For instance, it was just last month recently appointed Democratic National Committee Vice Chairman Keith Ellison took it upon himself to blame former president Obummer for his party’s 2016 losses and not being a “better party leader.”  And according to The Hill, while speaking at an event at the University of Minnesota, Ellison said, “Look I’m a great fan of President Obama … But Barack Obama could have been a better party leader, and I think the fact that he wasn’t put his legacy in jeopardy.”  The devastation that took place in the Democrat Party across all levels of government is really nothing short of staggering.  I won’t bore anyone by repeating the numbers, but the Democrat Party is now a shell of its former self and it’s all because of the man who so many had once viewed as being the second coming.

And then we have she who is the left’s progressive darling, Elizabeth Warren, who has also criticized Obummer’s “giant bling spots” in his communication with “most Americans.”  And it was ‘Crazy Old’ Liz who, in a recent interview, said, “I think President Obama, like many others in both parties, talk about a set of big national statistics that look shiny and great but increasingly have giant blind spots.”  And she went on to say, “That GDP, unemployment, no longer reflect the lived experiences of most Americans.”  Liz also said she was “troubled” that Obummer received $400,000 to address a Wall Street conference on health care this fall.  This all coming from someone who has on any number of occasions revealed herself to be little more than a complete fraud.  A trait that seems to bother those in her home state very little.

And there’s the geriatric socialist, Bernie Sanders, who represents a prime example of the division between the Democrat Party’s Establishment and progressive wings.  He too has blasted Obummer about his rather “distasteful” Wall Street speech.  Speaking with the Communist News Network (CNN) just last month, Sanders said Obummer’s decision to take that opportunity was “not a good idea,” and that he was “sorry President Obama made that choice … I just think it is distasteful — not a good idea that he did that.”  Weren’t these boobs paying the least amount of attention over the course of the last eight years, or were they just turning a blind eye because at least there was a Democrat in the White House.  Obummer is simply proving himself to be the kind of guy that most of us on the right always knew him to be.

However, the party’s weakness becomes most evident when examining the tension that now seems to exist between DNC Chairman Tom Perez and Sanders.  Just this week, the DNC snubbed Sanders and his supporters, arguing that the party did not owe them a “fair” 2016 primary process. Can you imagine?  The Washington Examiner reported, “DNC lawyers argue that they don’t owe anyone a fair process, and that the rules in their charter are basically not binding in court.  In fact, if they wanted, DNC attorney Bruce Spiva argued, they could choose their nominee in a smoke-filled back room and it still wouldn’t be legally actionable.”  So why is it that any reasonably intelligent individual chooses to tolerate such arrogance?  Or are they simply willing to overlook such behavior for what has become a growing list of ‘freebies’?

DNC Chair Tom Perez has also contributed to the party’s divisiveness by making pro-life Democrats feel unwelcome in the party.  In a statement last month, Perez said, “Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” adding that “every candidate who runs as a Democrat should” share the “Democratic Party’s position on women’s fundamental rights.”  In response, the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Chair Jane Kleeb called Perez’s comments “deplorable.”  According to The Atlantic, Kleeb said, “Tom Perez put every Democrat who is leading our party at the nationwide and statewide level in a very difficult position” by issuing a statement “that is now being interpreted as him saying he does not accept pro-life Democrats in the party.”

As for Pelosi, members of her own party have called her “out of touch” with her Democrat base.  And in a 2016 interview with CBS News’ Face the Nation, Pelosi said, “I don’t think people want a new direction.”  And just this past November Rep. Cedric Richmond criticized Pelosi, suggesting her proposals to empower junior members of Congress, by making certain positions available only to lawmakers who have served fewer than three or four terms, while she and Reps. Jim Clyburn and Steny Hoyer remain in their current posts, could decrease the Congressional Black Caucus’s power while increasing her own.  Richmond wrote, “The reality is that, from the perspective of the CBC, some changes may be beneficial while others may have severe unintended consequences that could diminish our power as a caucus within the Democratic Caucus.”

I think we can all agree that if there is one thing on which the Democrat Party stands united, it would the deep level of hatred that they have for America.  A hatred, I dare say, that is possessed by nearly every single individual who identifies as a Democrat.  There is that old adage, which I’m sure most as familiar with, which says, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”  And I only bring it up in an effort to point out how there are essentially eight levels of control which must first be successfully obtained before one is able to create a Socialist/Communist state.  And what I find to be rather striking, and more than a little frightening, is that there is a very clear similarity that exists between these eight levels of control and what has been consistently laid out in the platform of the Democrat Party, and for decades.

And if you don’t believe me, then compare for yourself:

  1. Healthcare: “Control healthcare and you control the people.”
  2. Poverty: “Increase the poverty level as high as possible.” Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
  3. Debt: “Increase the National Debt to an unsustainable level.” That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
  4. Class warfare: “Divide the people into the wealthy against the poor. Racially divide.” This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with full support of the voting poor.
  5. Welfare: “Take control of every aspect of their lives” (Food, livestock, housing and income).
  6. Education: “Take control of what people read and listen to (news media), along with control of what children learn in school.”
  7. Religion: “Remove faith in God from the government and school.”
  8. Gun Control: “Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government.” That way you are able to create a police state – total local control.

Pelosi is too narcissistic, senile or perhaps demented to look around and see that she has become irrelevant.  Perez is so far to the left he can’t stand up straight.  And then there’s Ellison, a known Moslem and a vocal supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood.  Sanders is 100% a Socialist as is Warren.  The Marxist, Socialist/Progressive Democrat Party wants nothing more than to destroy the Union.  Democrats and their judges choose which parts of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights they will obey.  Obummer the community agitator operated the very same way.  Their goal remains to get the majority of American citizens completely dependent on government. Leading to an Oligarchy destroying the sovereignty of American citizens.  And it’s RINOs like Paul Ryan who are in lockstep with these very same vile Democrats.

Now where I do agree with Pelosi is when it comes to how the Democrats, unlike Republicans, ALWAYS stick together, no matter what. The Republicans rarely work together and are just as likely to work with Democrats as they are with anyone in their own party.  Proof of that is seen in the recent spending bill just passed in the House where more Democrats voted in favor of it than did Republicans.  And it’s the Republicans who are in control of House.  Which provided us with yet another perfect example of how the Republicans were elected based almost solely on their false promises, and then almost immediately flip over to become Democrats once safely in office.  Come 2018 conservatives must band together and get rid of many of these RINOs as possible and replace them with likeminded leaders.

And where Democrats are like pit bulls, who hang together and hang onto their focus, Republicans tend to be more like squirrels trying to decide whether or not to run across the road.  And it’s even while in the minority that the Democrats have now chalked up three substantial victories: the blocking of two attempts at an immigration freeze in court and now this budget ‘deal’.  Make no mistake, they are starting to rally. Vetoing the bill and raking up the wrongly adjudicated decision in the Supreme Court, AND looking for some body shots to Democrats is now in order.  Sadly it looks to me as if the president is allowing the Democrats to appear stronger than they are, hopefully there will come a point where they will get a little overconfident reach for something he chooses not to allow them and WACK!  We can only hope.


Hitlery 7

For the longest time Hitlery simply could not bring herself to stop blaming everyone but herself for the fact that she had her rather sizable behind handed to her by Donald Trump.  Because, you see, there was simply no way that she could be to blame for her rather stunning defeat.  But at long last it would at least appear that she may now have finally come to grips with the fact that she, herself, is responsible for losing yet again in her second attempt to become the first female president of the United States.  Her admission, if you can call it that, came when she announced this past Tuesday, at something called a ‘Women For Women International’ event, that she now takes full responsibility for losing the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump, well sort of.

It’s ‘sort of’ because Hitlery is still out there trying her best to spin her loss in the 2016 presidential election.  And it was in speaking at this ‘Women for Women International’ event, on Tuesday of this week, that while Hitlery claimed to take “personal responsibility” for losing to Trump, it was almost in the same breath that she then immediately proceeded to lay that responsibility at the feet of James Comey and “Russian WikiLeaks.”  And then it was in referencing her forthcoming book about the campaign that she said, “I take absolute personal responsibility. I was the candidate. I was the person who was on the ballot and I am very aware of the challenges, the problems, the shortfalls that we had. Again I will write all this out for you.”  I can hardly wait.

And the old girl went on to say, “But I will say this: I’ve been in a lot of campaigns and I’m very proud of the campaign we ran and I’m very proud of the staff and the volunteers and the people who were out there day after day.”  She said, “And it wasn’t a perfect campaign. There is no such thing. But I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russia WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off.”  She said, “We overcame a lot in the campaign, we overcame a barrage of negativity, of false equivalency, but as Nate Silver…has concluded, if the election had been on October 27 I would be your president. But it wasn’t.”  No it wasn’t, thank God!

Hitlery said, “Did I make mistakes? Oh my gosh yes.”  She said, “But the reason why I believe we lost were the intervening events in the last 10 days.”  Yes, for sure, Hitlery made mistakes, plenty of them.  First and foremost it was her roughly 40 years of corruption.  I would say that that may have played at least some role in her loss.  Or maybe it was all those unanswered questions surrounding the death of four Americans, including our ambassador, in Benghazi.  Or how about never saying “I’m sorry” for accepting the answers to the questions during the primary debates?  She’s never once spoken to that little slip in moral judgement!  So how is it that she can still make the claim that she was on her way to winning?  Really?  How delusional can one person be?

And I’m also guessing that at least in her mind her loss had absolutely NOTHING to do with her e-mail scandal, or her constant lying about her e-mail scandal, or her rather deep ties to Wall Street which she preferred keeping secret, or her calling half of America “deplorables,” or the countless other scandals that she was caught up in.  Oh, and then there’s the whole being married-to-‘Slick Willy’-Clinton thing.  But go ahead Hitlery, believe whatever you want.  But on her way to winning?  At what stage of denial must one be at in order to come to the conclusion that, after factoring in all of the baggage associated with her, the fact that she lost the election has nothing whatsoever to do with her, and came about because of outside forces working against her?

In truth, Hitlery did little more than ‘stumble’ through the entire campaign!  And it didn’t help her cause that she ran one of the worst campaigns in recent memory.  She somehow felt that could simply ignore some very key states in order to spend time hobnobbing with the rich and famous in order to garner some cash and then do a sparsely attended “rally” with a handpicked crowd somewhere, only to then take off a long weekend off.  Meanwhile, Trump was out drawing SRO crowds all across the country, often several times a day, and day after day.  He campaigned, he worked for it, while she sat around waiting for the balloons to drop.  She seriously thought she had it wrapped up and could coast!  But a funny thing happened on the way to the election, she coasted right to defeat.

So anyway, Hitlery was also asked what she might have going on next?  Well, she said, “I’m now back to being an activist citizen and part of the resistance.”  Really?   What is it, I wonder, that she’s resisting?  Back to being an “activist citizen?”  When was it that she hasn’t been some sort of activist?  Here is an individual responsible for dragging her party down almost singlehandedly in the last election cycle.  Now, or so it would appear, she is seeking to be part of the cool kid’s crowd again?  I’m thinking that cool kids might want to think long and hard about whether she would be a help or a hindrance to their cause.  And I have to wonder if any of them are smart enough to see that she only seeks to use them for her own rather perverse reasons?

And you know, this is precisely what’s wrong with Hitlery, and what her husband understood: you can’t hijack a popular movement that you’ve had nothing to do with.  Bernie Sanders? Maybe. Hitlery? No way.  And who knows, perhaps Hitlery does still have 2020 ambitions. Those rumors are still floating out there, and right now, the three leading 2020 candidates for the Democrats are around her age: Elizabeth Warren (67), Joe Biden (74) and Bernie Sanders (75).  She’s a youthful 69. What’s to stop her from running again?  But what’s it say about a party that can only put forward for consideration a group of senior citizens?  And therein lies the problem for the Democrats.  All of their current first stringers are nothing but a bunch old fogeys ready to be sent off to the home.

Now whether or not Hillary plans to run in 2020, it is important for the Clintons to at least give the impression that they still hold or will again hold some manner of political power.  Because the minute that they signal that they are no longer relevant, every Clinton insider anywhere on the planet is going to start publishing books and giving interviews without fear of reprisal.  This is why they have pushed Chelsea into the spotlight – to make people think twice about dropping a dime on America’s First Family of Political Corruption.  Republicans should be excited to see Hitlery back in play, just as they should be excited that Obama is making a comeback.  Obummer and Hitlery helped raze a generation of Democrats and now they’re out to salt the earth.

And even after factoring in all of the many flaws that Hitlery possesses, there is also the issue of the progressive Democrat agenda that she enthusiastically endorses and that many Americans wanted to see, if not stopped, at least slowed to the greatest extent possible.  And it is that agenda which can be said to include, but is not limited to, the following:

  1. Amnesty for millions of illegals, millions more un-vetted Muslims, open borders, and more H-1B visas for cheap labor from 3rd world nations allowing 1 percenters to replace Americans who are forced to train them before being laid off.
  2. Higher taxes/more cuts to taxpayer funded benefits/services for Americans to pay for the support of the illegals in their states.
  3. Millions/Billions in federal tax dollars to protect illegal alien criminals in sanctuary cities/states regardless of the crimes they commit, including the rape/murder of women and children because Democrats now realize that their only remaining path to power is through the destruction of our sovereignty and the legalization of millions of illegals and so called “refugees”.
  4. The total destruction of organized religion/forced acceptance of their immoral ideological agenda including changes in laws to allow men in women’s restrooms, dressing rooms, locker rooms, showers, etc. regardless of the threat they pose to women/children. Forcing Americans to accept gay marriage as natural/normal and the destruction of the lives/livelihoods of those who believe faith/religion to be sacrosanct thus refusing to participate in said gay marriages. Simple tolerance/acceptance is not enough thus they purposely misconstrue “avoidance” with “discrimination” because only under the guise of discrimination can they destroy the lives of others via lawsuits and enrich themselves in the process.
  5. Disarming Americans/leaving them defenseless against the very criminals/terrorists they are so determined to bring into America. Democrats with their open border policies have flooded the country with dangerous criminals/drugs as well as Moslems from terrorist nations who refuse to assimilate and look to conquer/destroy peaceful nations with the terror/war they bring. Their stated goal is to force their culture, religion, and laws on other nations and it matters now how many they must kill in order to do so.  If you doubt that just take a look at what is happening in Europe.  And how many Christians have been slaughtered across the globe, denied entry to the U.S. while Obummer allowed Moslems to flood in to the U.S..
  6. Spending the country into oblivion/bankruptcy to buy votes at the expense of hardworking taxpayers to provide for the protection, transportation, and care of millions who entered the U.S. illegally and “refugees”, benefits to millions of lazy, able bodied, citizens who refuse to work, etc. while ignoring the needs of our own Vets, elderly, disabled/handicapped, and poor. Remember, it was Obummer who removed all work requirements for those on welfare/food stamps.

But look, at the end of the day whether it was because of numerous self-inflicted wounds or because she was peddling a Democrat agenda that is still opposed by a great many Americans, Hitlery lost the election.  But sadly she still doesn’t appear ready to go away any time soon.  Rumor has it that she will soon be starting up a new political action committee and will even resume giving paid speeches.  According to Axios’ Mike Allen, Hitlery’s PAC will work as a “quiet catalyst” to help grassroots political organizations, obviously of the leftwing variety.  She also plans to direct funds to congressional candidates in 2018.  But according to Allen’s sources the PAC is not a vehicle for a 2020 presidential bid.  But who really knows what this poor excuse of a former public servant is up to?