Never will you be able to find a greater concentration of perverts, addicts and/or just plain freaks than you’ll find in Hollyweird.  A place chock full of crazies of every stripe who somehow feel entitled to critique the lifestyles of those who refuse to go accept the rather bizarre way they choose to go through live.  Yup, big brave moral Hollyweird!  They don’t have a problem with standing up to Trump but they have been, for nearly 30 years, rather accepting of Harvey ‘The Pervert’ Weinstein’s systematic abuse of women.  If Kim Jong-un launches a missile toward the West Coast I just hope it’s Hollywood that becomes ground zero.

And it has recently surfaced, courtesy of a former New York Times reporter who investigated allegations of sexual harassment against Weinstein going as far back as 2004, that actors including Matt Damon and Russell Crowe lobbied the Times to kill her little expose.  In a column for ‘The Wrap’, the entertainment industry trade outlet that she founded, former reporter Sharon Waxman claimed that while investigating the then-recently appointed head of Miramax Italy, Fabrizio Lombardo, sources claimed he was installed in the position solely to arrange escorts for Weinstein, and that he had no prior filmmaking experience.

And then, in what was a pathetic attempt to shield their buddy, Weinstein, from a potentially damaging story, both Damon and Crowe allegedly contacted Waxman to “vouch” for Lombardo’s credentials.  Hey, it’s what these people do, they protect one another’s preferred perversions.  Ms. Waxman wrote, “After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.”  Ms. Waxman went on to say, “I was told at the time that Weinstein had visited the newsroom in person to make his displeasure known.”

Waxman also spoke to a British woman who claimed she had been paid off by Weinstein after what she described as being an “unwanted sexual encounter” but was bound by a non-disclosure agreement.  However, the story was eventually killed by The New York Times, after Waxman said the Times’ then-culture editor Jon Landman found it ‘unimportant’.  Waxman wrote, “‘He’s not a publicly elected official,’ he told me.  I explained, to no avail, that a public company would certainly have a problem with a procurer on the payroll for hundreds of thousands of dollars.  At the time, Disney told me they had no idea Lombardo existed.”

Waxman added that she was “devastated” that her story was finally published over a decade after she corroborated the evidence.  She went on to say, “I was devastated after traveling to two countries and overcoming immense challenges to confirm at least part of the story that wound up running last week, more than a decade later.”  And she continued by saying, “Today I wonder: If this story had come to light at the time, would Weinstein have continued his behavior for another decade.”  So you have to wonder how many more women would go on to be molested by this pervert, and shouldn’t Damon and Crowe be considered as accomplices to the crimes?

And oddly enough, yet another, at least potential, accomplice in all of this weirdness should be none other than George ‘Looney’ Clooney, who has worked with Weinstein for 20 years and although he claims never to have ‘witnessed’ Weinstein’s history of sexual harassment, he admitted to taking the rumors “with a grain of salt.”  It was in an interview with the Daily Beast that Clooney said, “We’ve had dinners, we’ve been on location together, we’ve had arguments.  But I can tell you that I’ve never seen any of this behavior—ever.”  For anyone believing this drivel, I’ve got some prime ocean front property in Arizona that I can let you have really cheap.

Because while Weinstein has reportedly been sexually harassing his employees and actresses for nearly three decades, Clooney said he had heard some rumors but he simply turned the other cheek every time.  He said, “I’ve heard rumors, and the rumors in general started back in the nineties, and they were that certain actresses had slept with Harvey to get a role.”  And he went on to say, “It seemed like a way to smear the actresses and demean them by saying that they didn’t get the jobs based on their talent, so I took those rumors with a grain of salt.”  Really, George?  What that sounds like to me is nothing more than a lame response and a cop out.

Clooney admitted that there were warning signs, but never would have thought that Weinstein was going to the point where he had to pay women to keep quiet.  He said, “A lot of people are doing the ‘you had to know’ thing right now, and yes, if you’re asking if I knew that someone who was very powerful had a tendency to hit on young, beautiful women, sure.”  And added, “But I had no idea that it had gone to the level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women were threatened and victimized. I’ve been talking with a lot of people about this and I don’t know many people who knew of that.”  What a bunch of bullshit!

But look, there’s nothing really new here, Hollyweird has always been like this, hiding the sexual and drug, escapades (even the criminal ones) and sexual proclivities of its big name stars, directors, producers, etc. was just routine, all part of the cost of doing bussiness.  Consider Fatty Arbuckle, Rock Hudson, Montgomery Cliff, Roman Polanski, hidden, covered up and protected.  As for the women, the ‘casting couch’ has always been around and probably most of the women considered it just what they had to do to get the good roles and their name up in lights.  Sad to say, that attitude hasn’t actually changed as much as you would have thought.

Those in our state-controlled media complex can also be said to have been accomplices.  They have long been charged with the covering up of bad behavior and have been very accommodating when it comes to those in our entertainment industry.  Thus, the media has played a critical role in destruction of our country, knowing, that if it could destroy the family, sufficiently undermine the Judeo-Christian standards of behavior and morality, then America could be made to belong to the left forever.  Acceptance of drug use, recreational sex of every sort and all manner of gender redefinition, could never succeed without the media’s very enthusiastic championing.

All our favorite media types from Walter Cronkite to Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw all the way to today’s con artist driven ‘fake news’ circus barkers makes those in the state-controlled media complex the champions of oppression and tyranny.  And isn’t it amazing how no one in leftist Hollywood, or the media, or the Democrat Party, of which Weinstein has always been a strong supporter, knew anything about this until just last week?  All they do is tell us how deplorable and stupid we are, how we need to ignore our values and belief and be more accepting of perverse behavior.  When in truth most of them are either perverts or simply enablers.  We should turn them off.

As we all know, or should know, the media in this country has had a very sinister agenda for some time.  An agenda that has them thinking we’re too stupid to understand and that they can easily con us when it comes to things like the protecting of scum like Weinstein.  Anyone with any amount of sense can tell this guy is a pervert just from looking at him.  And yet the New York Times was willing to keep hidden Weinstein’s nasty deviant criminal behavior for decades.  Believe me, the New York Times is an organization of the left and seeks to protect others of the left, and in so doing enabled this pervert to cause women to suffer for more than a decade.

You can say what you want about the so-called right-wingers, but they live much closer to what they preach than do those on the left have been doing for decades.  We on the right ask people to live within their means, not to break the law and not to kill innocent children just because they might cramp your lifestyle.  Meanwhile, Al Gore preaches from on high about how we are destroying the world with our carbon footprints while enjoying life by making one of the largest footprints the Earth has ever seen.  Hollyweird spends time condemning the way regular folks choose to live, while taking part in every perversion imaginable.  And Democrats just don’t care.



After hearing how it was that if Trump were to win on Election Day, all manner of Hollyweird ‘celebrities’ would likely head north of the border, only to find out after Trump did win that they were all simply kidding, I came to be so depressed.  But apparently not as depressed as was old Bobby De Niro upon hearing the news that Trump had beaten Hitlery like a bastard stepchild.  But Bobby felt the need to take things a step further.  You see, it was after campaigning heavily for Hitlery that Bobby now states that the election of Donald Trump as president makes him “feel like I did after 9/11.”  How pathetic is that?

Bobby lamented how the loss of Hitlery has left him with a case of post-election blues.  In an interview with ‘Agence France-Presse’ last Friday, Bobby was asked if he supported protests across the country, which has included the closing of metropolitan freeways at times.  And it was in typical fashion that this mental midget replied, “Yes, absolutely!”  And he went on to say, “Things aren’t being done right.”  Bobby then called on his ‘comrades’ to stay “vigilant” under Trump saying, “We have to just wait and see how things go and keep our eyes ever-vigilant on the new government.”  Vigilant for what, exactly?

Bobby had been virulently against the election of Trump pretty much throughout the entire campaign, even doing a stupid monologue this past October in which he called Trump “an embarrassment” to the United States and said he would like to “punch him in the face.”  He also said that a Hitlery loss would be a “tragedy.”  He did not say that the “tragedy” to which he referred would be akin to 3,000 people losing their lives to Islamic terrorists.  And now that I know what he meant, I wish I didn’t.  But look, I’m far from surprised to hear that this is how he feels, this is the caliber of people who now call themselves Democrats.

So let me see if I have this right, 3000 innocent people were murdered in cold blood by 19 Islamic fanatics and Bobby claims he was made to feel the exact same way as a result of his corrupt candidate losing an election?  Say that to the families of the 3000 who were murdered.  What about those of us who were sad and depressed both times Barry was elected?  Did we take to burning down our neighbors homes, destroying their businesses or calling for the rape of the first lady.  Please, Bobby, do us all a huge favor and move to some socialist country and take all of your Hollyweird buddies with you.

My parents always taught me to respect my elders, and while I’m much closer to Bobby’s age than I care to admit, yet every time I see this asshole’s face it seems to be taunting me into wanting to punch it.  I promised those people who perished on 9/11 that “I WILL NEVER FORGET”, and Bobby’s disrespect for their memories is so shameful.  I guess I could say that I will never go to see another of his movies, but I honestly can’t remember the last time I went to the movies.  The entertainment value provided simply doesn’t match the cost that I’m now expected to cheerfully pay just for admittance, never mind the cost of the munchies.

Bobby is another one of those Hollyweird imbeciles who thinks just because he can read lines written by others it somehow provides to him some special insight into the lives of others and gives him a special position on which he can influence the thinking of others.  No one cares what this leftist loony thinks nor that he supported the most corrupt candidate ever to run.  He lives in the Hollyweird bubble where reality long ago departed and was replaced by overpaid imbeciles who are nothing more than political groupies and advocates for Socialism.  That is, socialism for the great unwashed, but not for themselves.



Well it would seem that we have yet another Hollywood luminaries who is not partial to Donald Trump.  This time it’s Kevin Spacey, who plays President Frank Underwood on House of Cards, who has now offered his opinion of the 2016 presidential race.  And it’s according to Spacey that Donald Trump’s campaign reminds him of George Wallace’s independent campaign in 1968.  Apparently Spacy was interested in politics at an early age, as he was the ripe old age of 9 when Wallace represented the American Independent Party in the 1968 presidential race.  Of course Spacey fails to mention that Wallace ran for the nomination of Spacey’s own Democrat Party in 1964, 1972 and again in 1976.

In making his idiotic comments Spacey said, “I mean, Frank Underwood would look at this particular year and find it as amusing as I do. At the end of the day, the United States has time and again — despite sometimes when we think there’s some crazy shit going down — we generally get it right eventually.” He compared Trump’s campaign to Wallace’s, saying, “It’s exactly the same campaign. I mean, exactly the same.”  Now since I doubt very much that as a 9 year old Spacey was paying much attention to presidential politics I can only guess that the basis for this comparison of his comes from sources other than memory.  Sources that are, most likely, extremely left-leaning in their politics.

This is far from being the first time that Spacey has made his dislike of Trump public.  Last September, in an appearance on the Communist News Network (CNN) it was Dana Bash who then asked him how ‘Underwood’ would beat Donald Trump in the 2016 election, Spacey replied, “He would kill Donald Trump. That’s number one. Trump would never make it to Election Day. Done. Over.”  Now is that really the sort of ‘intelligent’ response that one would expect to hear from someone who wishes to have their opinions taken seriously?  And yet these imbeciles, like Spacey, demand that the American people pay attention to what it is they have to say.  They’re nuts!!

And ya know, I’m sure it goes without saying, Spacey has always been known as being a big supporter of Barry “Almighty”.  It was back in July 2013, that he gushed, “President Obama will go down as having passed some of the most historic bills in the history of this country. That despite constant knee-jerk opposition from the Republicans. A lot of people don’t realize how much he’s done in the most difficult circumstances.”  That the legislation that has been passed during Barry’s tenure can be called ‘historic’ is not in dispute here.  But how much of that legislation has proven to be a benefit to the country and how much has proven to be a benefit to the Democrat Party?

But look, this has become the kind of gibberish that now passes for intelligent conversation whenever we have limousine liberals like Spacey offering up their idiotic opinions on the important issues for the day.  And it’s why most rational, patriotic Americans tend to ignore anything that these imbeciles might have to say.  Hollywood has always been home for communist sympathizers so, I suppose, it should come as no surprise that is remains, today, home for some of the most twisted, left-leaning and drugged out morons that you’ll find anywhere in the country, or anywhere on the planet for that matter.  People who, if they were to live anywhere else, would be penniless.



I have never quite been able to figure out how it is that those who so proudly wear the moniker of ‘Liberal’ can come to so vehemently hate this country and all that it stands for.  What makes someone applaud efforts to tear down, eradicate, or simply have declared as being illegal the very institutions which form the very foundation of this once great and proud nation.  They have no problem with condoning all manner of bad behavior, no matter how illegal, or perverted it may be, and then accuse those of us who choose not to, of being intolerant.

For instance, it was earlier this week during an interview that comedian, and I use the term very loosely because I’ve seen this guy’s act and he’s anything but funny, George Lopez described Donald Trump’s comments on illegal immigration as “vile”.  But I’m thinking that more than likely the reason Lopez didn’t like what Trump said had far more to do with the fact that it was a white guy who said it than with what was actually said.  Because Lopez has been saying derogatory things about Hispanics for years as part of idiotic standup routine.

And now come reports that NBC’s top brass are said to be looking for a minority to replace Trump on the popular reality television show ‘Celebrity Apprentice’, a decision that was apparently made after Trump’s comments during his campaign announcement which ignited what has now become a media firestorm.  But let’s face it, as a candidate Trump wasn’t going to be able to do the show anyway.  And who is better than Trump at being Trump?  That would be ‘No One.’  And if it’s Lopez that’s being considered as a replacement, lots of luck!

It was during the aforementioned interview done with ‘TMZ’ that Lopez said, “Listen, those (Trump’s) comments are vile in any civilized society, but there’s a freedom of speech.”  And he went on to say, “I know him, I don’t particularly like what he’s saying, but there is a right to say that.”  Well at least he got that part right, but I’m sure it was nothing more than a slip of the tongue.  Because usually freedom of speech is the first to go whenever one is taking on one for the issues most favored by those on the left.  You must agree or be called a bigot.

Lopez said that he plans on boycotting Trump’s golf course, though he conceded that it probably won’t affect Trump’s bottom line.  Ya, I bet that’ll bring a tear to ‘The Donald’s’ one good eye.  NOT!  Lopez also went on to say that he thinks Trump could get elected, and predicted what Latinos might do if that were to actually happen, and that would be for all them to just leave.  Sorry George, but I’m just not seeing a down side to that, and somehow I think this country could go on.  So in other words, don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

“Yeah, sure, [he has a chance],” Lopez told TMZ. “There’s enough racists in this country for him to get elected.”  Lopez jokingly ended the brief interview saying, “Trump in 2016.”  He added, “If he wins, he won’t have to worry about immigration, we’ll all go back.”  We should be so lucky!  But where else does Lopez think he could go and make the amount of money that he makes in America.  And yet he so disrespects this country.  And let’s be honest here, it doesn’t take much brainpower to be a standup comic.  Lopez proves that point every time he opens his mouth.

Liberals like Lopez see absolutely nothing wrong with allowing those who are in this country illegally to ignore our laws.  And they also seem not to be bothered in the least when these individuals, again who are in this country illegally, murder and rape Americans.  Perhaps if it had been this moron’s daughter who had recently been murdered by an illegal scum his opinion might be different.  Although I seriously doubt it.  Liberals just don’t look at things the way normal people do.  We are supposed to be nation of laws, but liberals don’t see it that way.

And so it would seem that those on the left, those who agree with Mr. Lopez, are winning, or may even have already won, the battle for the soul of America.  And I think we can also all safely come to agree on the fact that it has been the presidency of one Barack Hussein Obama that has provided much assistance in that endeavor. And, again, all too sadly at the expense of the rule of law.  And it has been those on the left who view such a consequence as being insignificant and as a necessary, even integral, part of the entire ‘transformation’ process.