It was during a recent interview that Pete Buttigieg’s same-sex ‘husband,’ Chasten ‘Buttigieg,’ told Linsey Davis of ABC ‘News’ that the time has come to restore “moral leadership” in the White House.  Buttigieg made this point after Davis played for him a clip of Rush Limbaugh saying: “They’ve got to be saying that despite all the great progress and despite all the great wokeness and despite all the great ground that has been covered America’s still not ready to elect a gay guy kissing his husband on the debate stage president.” Davis asked him, “What is your response to it?”

‘Buttigieg’ responded by saying “I’ve been dealing with this my whole life.” ‘Buttigieg’ went on to say, “I dealt with a multitude of Rush Limbaughs when I was walking through the hall ways of my high school.”  He said, “You saw that Pete is ready to go toe-to-toe with this president and Pete can take on the likes of Rush Limbaugh.”  And he continued by saying, “But I am more worried about the kids.”  Right, he’s worried about the kids.  Democrats are ALWAYS worried about the “kids” unless, of course, they happen to be one those “kids” in the womb.

He said, “I’m more worried about the people in this country who are watching how we treat this candidacy, treat this campaign, and the way we treat people who for so long have been attacked by people like Rush Limbaugh and this president.”  And he said, “And I think: It is time for moral leadership to be restored to the White House. So when you are ready to share that deepest truth about yourself, when you are ready to step out of the closet you step out into something hopeful and inclusive, and you look up to Washington and you see a president who cares about you and loves you.”

And so we have a practicing homosexual who now feels somehow qualified to lecture the American people on ‘morality.’  Seriously?  Morality for whom, exactly?  Homosexuals who practice immoral sexual relations are immoral–not moral–individuals who do so for their own pleasures and self-centered behaviors.  This country truly is upside down when it comes to right and wrong so is it any wonder that we have young children changing genders because of their misguided parents, people supporting infanticide, and confusion as to what is truly moral in this world.

Pete and Chasten have made it more than a little clear that they intend to be very “in your face” with this deviant lifestyle they have chosen for themselves and you will yield to their lifestyle and above all you WILL accept it.  How foolish they are, how far off base they are, when it comes to the American people. Most won’t openly express their disdain for this lifestyle because of the potential threat of harassment, but in the voting booth their true beliefs will be made.  And yet we continue to have these deviant individuals who insist upon trying to pull us all into their twisted world.

And Buttigieg is unwilling to even consider the point Rush was making.  Perhaps we don’t care at all what these two do behind closed doors, perhaps we simply don’t want to have to look at it every day ‘if’ they become the first couple. More to the point, perhaps we don’t want the son of a communist, who’s studied how to sound like Barry ‘O’, who was the failed mayor of some small town somewhere, with zero experience and who couldn’t lead an ant to a picnic, as the president of the United States. And the gay community isn’t going to bully us into accepting him.

I am a straight American male, I am married and I have a successful daughter.  A am also a military veteran and a Christian.  And it is as such that I am not about to lectured to by someone whose ‘lifestyle’ is anything but normal.  And while there are those who attempt to convince us that there is some huge gay population in this country who we must somehow be accepting of, it’s at the present time the actual percentage of those who profess to be gay in this country is roughly 3.5-4.5 percent of the population, not the nearly 25 percent thought to be by most Americans.

A doctor once wrote that there are openings in the body which are not designed for entry but for exit and that reversing this is physically damaging and can be devastating. To say nothing of dealing with fecal matter. Take away the question of morality, this is flat-out unhealthy. Many end up with colostomy bags. One man who was abused as a boy said that the physical damage to his digestive tract has been permanent.  So to in any way imply that what takes place here can in any way be described, or even thought of, as being ‘normal’ is a complete and utter fallacy.

What an idiot. He condemns what he assumes to be the bigotry of others based on his own over-estimation of his worth to the rest of us. He is just another human being, and not a terribly smart one at that.  He’s too busy playing the victim to bother listening to what Rush actually said.  Rush didn’t say that someone engaged in homosexual behavior cannot be president.  He simply analyzed the attitude of the overall population and questioned whether the entire country was ready for an openly homosexual president.  It wasn’t a slam against gays, it was an honest observation.

Democrats love ‘talking’ about morality while at the very same time they push for the slaughter of children, now that’s truly delusional.  Morality is a word Democrats always love to trot out while at the same time they are working hard behind the scene on pushing their true, and rather nefarious agenda. Morality?  I would argue that our problem is that we no longer follow longstanding moral virtues.  These day we seem to have our own answers!  Moral leadership being proposed by a gay man?  Sorry but that’s just not something I’m willing to accept.  It makes no sense to me.


Trump 16

So I guess I’m one of those non-college educated folks who are, if you listen to a lot of folks on the left and the right, just not smart enough to figure out that we’re being bamboozled by Donald Trump.  Well let me tell ya something, I’ll agree that there is some bamboozling going on here, but the ones doing it are some the very folks that I’ve been voting for for decades, and some are actually the so-called leaders of my party.  You know the ones, guys like McConnell, Boehner, McCain and more recently, Ryan.  But there are plenty more.  These four are but the tip of a very large iceberg.

So anyway, let’s just say, for the sake of argument, that we are all somehow being bamboozled by Trump, what is it that makes voting for him any different than voting for those individuals I just listed, those who have been bamboozling us for years?  But I guess the question I would like to put to you is, “What if we’re not being bamboozled by Trump?”  And what if he actually intends to carry through with everything that he’s promised?  Wouldn’t that at least be worth the risk?  What have we really got to lose?  My worry is that the intent of the men I’ve mentioned is to make sure he doesn’t succeed.

So what if many us decide, as many are now threatening to do, to either vote third party or simply stay home on Election Day, allowing Hitlery to become president?  What can we expect to happen then?  Personally, I think that’s pretty much a given.  Hitlery would continue us on the march that was begun by Barry in the direction where America becomes little more than a third world country with a second rate, or worse, military.  And is that really the direction that most Americans wish this country to go?  If so, then we’re really already there, we just don’t know it yet.

The cold hard fact is that during Barry’s time in office the government has taken in nearly $20 Trillion in taxes and spent nearly $29 Trillion.  And in just EIGHT YEARS!  How many of us can run our homes or businesses that way?  And am I the only one who sees that as being nothing short of criminal?  And what does anyone think that Hitlery will do different?  She fully intends on allowing more people into this country that represent a very clear and present danger to the American people and she also plans to systematically restrict our right to protect ourselves from the threat that she herself will be forcing upon us.

Bamboozled?  No I think not, at least not by Mr. Trump.  Maybe by the Democrats, or the NeverTrumpers and most definitely by the state-controlled media.  Look, I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but I’m usually pretty good at figuring out when I’m being lied to, or played for a sap.  Yes I know Trump has said some pretty dumb things, but then he’s new to the world of politics.  Hitlery is the political veteran, and what she has done far exceeds anything that Trump has said or likely will say.  She is a despicable human being who deserves to be sitting in prison, not sitting in the Oval Office.

The point I’m trying to make here is that those on the left, assisted by those who are part of the NeverTrump crowd, are working very hard to convince us that Trump is somehow unfit to be president.  Their supposed concern comes across as bordering on hysteria.  And those in our state controlled media seem to be on the verge of coming completely unhinged.  The power that this man seems to have over these people is really quite extraordinary.  He has them all sounding like babbling idiots and not the least bit credible in their calls for him to be defeated.

The bottom line here is that we are rapidly running out of the time that we have to decide what it is that we intend to do come this November 8.  There is going to come for us to either shit or get off the pot.  So if you truly do feel that Hitlery is the better option then, by all means either vote for her, stay home, or vote third party.  But if you’re like me, someone willing to take a chance on Trump, then make sure you, and as many of your friends as you can muster up, get out and vote for him.  Personally, I’m willing to risk allowing the other side the opportunity to come back and tell me, “I told you so.”



Anyone who is unable to recognize the fact that the Democrats actually WANT these Muslim terrorists to win, and are actually assisting them in their effort to do so, well then, you just go right ahead and stay home this November so Hitlery can waltz right into the Oval Office and pick up right where Barry leaves off.  Or worse, why don’t you go right ahead and vote for the lying bitch.

And for anyone who saw John Kerry-Heinz in Aspen recently, what you saw was yet another lying piece of shit doing his absolute best to convince the rest of us into believing that these murdering Muslims are somehow in their death throes.  Again, if you’re stupid enough to buy that nonsense, well then, I suppose you’re stupid enough to not vote for Trump.  Stupid is, as stupid does.

And I keep hearing from those who claim they are not voting for Trump because they believe there are better choices available.  That they believe in supporting the Constitution and are above party politics and the concept of winning at all costs.  How sanctimonious can one be?  That’s all well and good, but wake the f*ck up and smell the coffee, the rest of our lives may depend on it.

If there was a better choice available, that would be one thing, but there isn’t.  At least a better choice that can win, and that’s really what it’s all about isn’t it, winning.  So ok, we let Hitlery win, but in so doing you had better prepare yourself to start seeing our malls blowing up and our theaters blowing up especially as we start approaching the holiday season.  Because it’s gonna happen!

Because like I said, the Democrats and these Muslim fanatics are on the same side and against the rest of us.   So all of you who just can’t bring yourself to vote for Trump, just go ahead and lay down, because that’s exactly what they want you to do.  But I for one do not intend to lay down.  I will vote for Trump. And if he turns out to be as bad as you’ve said, then I’ll welcome your, “I told you sos!”


Climate Change 20

Regardless of the fact that a majority of those in this country refuse to buy into the continuing propaganda from Democrats and their many minions in the state-controlled media regarding what was once referred to, decades ago, as global cooling, then as global warming, then simply as climate change  and then, when nothing else seemed to apply, as climate disruption.  But a by any other name it’s still a scam.  And now it’s been reported, as we always knew it would, that Barry “Almighty’s” global warming scam would cost America’s poorest families Billions every year.  That’s according to a report recently published by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Barry’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 Billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 Billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Meanwhile, Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.  Perhaps here we have a reason why Democrat and wealthy liberals like George ‘Looney’ Clooney, Alec ‘The Moron’ Baldwin and of course Lenny DiCaprio seem to be so very firmly on the side of this insanity.

And oddly enough it’s the very ones who would be getting hit the hardest, if Barry and his Democrat allies are able to succeed with their plan, who insist upon voting for the very ones who agree with Barry that ‘climate change’ is to be the next great apocalypse to be face by man, and only man can do something about it.  So these people are doing nothing than to essentially make themselves poorer for no reason.  Because all of the money Barry wants to spend will accomplish nothing more than to drive energy costs up while having what will be virtually no impact on the climate. It simply makes no sense to support those who support this insanity.

What Barry wants to do is to implement the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax.  In addition, Barry has also proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.  Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming/climate change. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small that it couldn’t be detected.  So what’s really behind Barry’s plan?

Oren Cass is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and he is also the man who authored this specific study.  He said, “The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it.” The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor far more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy; while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.  And yet the Democrats portray themselves as being defenders of the poor.

The average American’s electric bill has already gone up 10 percent just since Barry took office in January, 2009, all due to federal regulations.  Granted to rich Hollywood types that a pretty trivial amount, but to many Americans it’s significant. The amount spent to meet global carbon dioxide emissions reduction goals could be as high as $16.5 Trillion between now and 2030, when energy efficiency measures are included, according to projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA). To put these numbers in perspective, the U.S. government is just over $19 Trillion in debt and only produced $17.4 Trillion in gross domestic product in 2014.

Wouldn’t it be nice for change that if what this next election resulted in was us electing a president who bases their policy on the hard facts of this issue.  Because if that were to actually occur the fact are easily available, all one has to do is want to pay attention to them.  As an example, here are but a few crucial, easily verifiable facts about human-generated carbon dioxide and its effect on global warming that he, and everyone else, needs to know and to better understand. The fact is, there has been global warming, but the contribution of human-generated carbon dioxide is necessarily so minuscule as to be nearly undetectable.

Here’s why:

  1. Carbon dioxide, considered the main vector for human-caused global warming, is some 0.038% of the atmosphere – a trace gas.
  2. Water vapor varies from 0% to 4%, and easily averages 1% or more near the Earth’s surface, where the greenhouse effect would be most important, and is about three times more effective a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide. So water vapor is at least 25 times more prevalent and three times more effective; that makes it at least 75 times more important to the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide.
  3. The TOTAL contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect is therefore 0.013 or less. The total human contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide since the start of the industrial revolution has been estimated at about 25%.
  4. So humans’ carbon dioxide greenhouse effect is a quarter of 0.013, works out to about 0.00325. Total warming of the Earth by the greenhouse effect is widely accepted as about 33 degrees Centigrade, raising average temperature to 59 degrees Fahrenheit. So the contribution of anthropogenic carbon dioxide is less than 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit, or under 0.1 degree Centigrade. Global warming over the last century is thought by many to be 0.6 to 0.8 degrees Centigrade.

But that’s only the beginning:

  1. We’ve had global warming for more than 10,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age, and there is evidence temperatures were actually somewhat warmer 9,000 years ago and again 4,500 to 8,000 years ago than they are today.
  2. Whatever caused that, it was not human activity. It was not all those coal burning power plants and factories and SUVs being operated by Stone Age cavemen while chipping arrowheads out of bits of flint. Whatever the cause was, it melted the glaciers that in North America once extended south to Long Island and parts of New York City into virtually complete disappearance (except for a few mountain remnants). That’s one big greenhouse effect!
  3. If we are still having global warming – and I suppose we could presume we are, given this 10,000 year history – it seems highly likely that it is still the overwhelmingly primary cause of continued warming, rather than our piddling 0.00325 contribution to the greenhouse effect. Yet even that trend-continuation today needs to be proven.
  4. Evidence is that the Medieval Warm Period centered on the 1200s was somewhat warmer than we are now, and the climate was clearly colder in the Little Ice Age in the 1600s than it is now. So we are within the range of normal up-and-down fluctuations without human greenhouse contributions that could be significant, or even measurable.
  5. The principal scientists arguing for human-caused global warming have been demonstrably disingenuous, and now you can see why. They have proven that they can not, and should not, be trusted.

The idea that we should be spending hundreds of Billions of dollars and hamstringing the economy of the entire world to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is beyond ludicrous in light of the facts stated above; it’s simply insane. Furthermore, it sucks attention and resources from seeking the other sources of warming and from coping with climate change and its effects in realistic ways. The true motivation underlying the global warming movement is almost certainly ideological and political in nature, and I predict that climate change, as currently presented, will go down as the greatest fraud of all time. It makes Ponzi and Madoff look like rookies by comparison.


alec baldwin 1

Let me preface what I am about to say here by first saying that anyone who actually believes that entertainers, be they actors, singers, dancers or whatever, are in anyway knowledgeable about anything other than their chosen profession, I think can safely be said to be, at best, seriously misguided, and at worst terminally naïve.   Because when it comes to having received any kind of actual education most of these entertainment types never progressed much beyond high school and more than a few of them likely never even made it that far.  So it’s always best to take whatever they say, about almost anything, with a rather sizable grain of salt.

Now having said that, I think it reasonable to assume that most folks are quite familiar with the periodic fits of outlandish behavior frequently seen coming from that well-known Hollywood loon, Alec Baldwin.  After all, the guy has got quite a temper.  More than once over the course of the last few years his numerous bouts of what can only be described as pretty bizarre behavior have made him the subject of more than just a few news stories.  And it’s yet another example of that that now comes to us by way of a recent interview with AFP that apparently took place after Mr. Baldwin sounded off on climate change at the United Nations.

Baldwin, like most of those in that bastion of insanity called Hollywood, has a rather overinflated sense of importance.  And that was made quite apparent when he took it upon himself to describe those skeptical of ‘climate change’ as suffering from “mental illness.”  Something I think that we can all agree on is the fact that if there is a subject to which Mr. Baldwin can relate, it’s the subject of ‘mental illness’.  And so it was during his appearance at the U. N. that he said, “There can be no successful climate agreement and no future for our planet without greater protection of the world’s forests, everyone in the room understands this.”

And it was in his interview afterward with AFP that Baldwin said, “And so much of what’s coming on now is something that we have to treat as some kind of mental illness.”  He went on to say, “I believe the climate change denial is a form of mental illness.”  Actually, I think it can be said that to deny the overwhelming amount of actual science that proves beyond all doubt that it’s Baldwin and his ilk who, while they may not be suffering from mental illness, are most certainly suffering from some sort of disorder that has them being unable to deal with reality.  They insist upon living within their own little world of make believe.

The fact is that like Liberalism/progressivism, belief in ‘climate change’, can, I think, be said to be the equivalent of some sort of disorder, the symptoms of which include, but are not limited to, a total group think based on some universal doctrine that requires neither proof nor evidence of existence.  Plus, there is ALWAYS a blind and unquestioning loyalty to the Liberal high priests who control what the new narrative will be, and all must follow it regardless of the lack of any logic, evidence, or the likely destructiveness of said narrative, i.e. the new found outrage over one tenth of one percent using the opposite sexes bathroom.

The truth is that you cannot be a Liberal, plain and simple, without a belief in the existence of man-made ‘climate change’, it’s simply impossible.  Baldwin is simply another, on a very long list of many, Hollywood liberal/progressive with ZERO background in science and/or math. The climate has always been changing, it’s impossible for it not to and it’s going to continue to change regardless of what man does, or does not do.  Because man has very little to do with it. The big glowing yellow ball in the sky called the SUN is what has the number 1 influence on our climate, not the puny activities of man.

But look, like I said Baldwin does know a thing or two about mental illness. He’s one of those typical radicals who claim that people who view the “global warming by man” idea as not being probable, are denying that there is ‘climate change’ taking place. But nobody has ever said that.  Of course there is climate change taking place, where the disagreement comes in is whether or not it’s being caused by man and therefore man can do anything about it.  Which is absolutely nuts!  Does Baldwin realize that North America was once like the North Pole, covered with ice and snow and now it’s not?  That would be because of ‘climate change’.

Now you would think that especially someone like Baldwin, who so obviously views himself as being so much smarter than we the little people upon whom he relies for his livelihood, would be able to figure out for himself how it is that the world is not exactly like your house.  In that when you set your temperature at 75 your home will pretty much stay at 75 until you decide change the thermostat either warmer, or cooler.  But it would seem that that entire concept escapes him completely.  Now Mr. Baldwin is far from being the only one in his odd little clique who seems to possess zero understanding of what is actually occurring.

Because like so many of those who are so busy sounding the alarm over what they perceive as being the next great apocalypse to be faced by all of mankind, Baldwin finds it far more convenient to simply rely on that which is nothing more than the nearest endless stream of propaganda surrounding the issue than it is to actually go in search of the facts.  And it’s this propaganda that is based far more on leftwing politics than it is on any kind of provable science.  But it matters very little to those who are suffering from a psychosis that seems to inflict, for whatever reason, those in government and the entertainment business more than it does ordinary Americans.



Schumer 13

So, now we have Chuckie Schumer, aka ‘Chester the Molester’, as was his Democrat colleague over in the House, Steny Hoyer, being unable to provide a simple yes or no answer to what a very basic question, one that is far from complex.  Of course that question is, whether or not he believes that biological males should be allowed to use women’s restrooms in federal facilities and parks in the United States.  But Chuckie did say he thought that the North Carolina law requiring people to use a restroom that matches their biological sex should be repealed.

So it was then that Chuckie was recently asked the question: “There has been a great deal of controversy lately about North Carolina’s bathroom law. Do you believe that biological males should be allowed to use the ladies’ rooms in federal facilities and parks around the country?”  And Chuckie chose to respond using typical Democrat gibberish saying, “I believe the North Carolina law is discriminatory and they ought to repeal it.”  Now personally, as a commonsense kind of guy, I’m simply not seeing any sort of justification for repealing this law.

And as it has been pointed out, numerous times, the North Carolina law, H.B. 2, states it is “an act to provide for single-sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities in schools and public agencies and to create statewide consistency in regulation of employment and public accommodations.”  And it then goes on to state that those restrooms are to be used according to one’s biological sex – “the physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person’s birth certificate.”  And for that Chuckie wants it repealed?

However, what nasty old perverts like Schumer, and Hoyer as well, continue to so conveniently leave out of the conversation is the fact that this law, which they claim to be so discriminatory, also allows for “accommodations” by allowing entities to provide single-use restrooms “upon a person’s request due to special circumstances.”  But again, I’m assuming that that just makes too much sense for creepy old perverts like Schumer.  And I’d like to know why is it that it’s always we on the right who are the ones who must relinquish our values.

Chuckie, like Steny, is a prime example of just how deviant those in the Democrat Party have now become.  And I’m sure he figures that he can gain a few votes from the pervert crowd by going against the law!  I’d be curious to know when we can expect to hear Chuckie to start calling for the boycotting of those countries that treat women worse than we allow people in this country to treat their animals?  And I would argue that by calling for a repeal of a law that seeks nothing more than to keep men out of women’s restrooms makes clear how he feels about the issue.

Now the question has been posed by more than a few asking why it is that we should be wasting our time discussing this issue when we have so many other far more important issues that are in need of being discussed.  I think we can all agree that this restroom issue is little more than a distraction.  This is how today’s ‘progressive’ scumbags work, while we’re trying to discuss the important issues, they’re busy trying to work under the radar in an effort to slide our country even further into their preferred area of operation, which would be, of course, the gutter.

The reality is that what’s underway here actually has very little, if anything at all, to do with this new law in North Carolina. That serves as being nothing more than a vehicle by which scumbag Democrats hope to clandestinely continue their effort to eat away at the moral fabric of our society.  The desire of the left has long been to somehow make behavior once seen as being completely unacceptable to at least appear as being acceptable, and then to cast those of us who object to be subjected to such behavior as being nothing more than bigots.

So I guess I would ask those who are now questioning the importance, or even the relevance, of such a conversation taking place, ‘what is more important than morality when it comes to the very survival of one’s society?’  Are we simply to allow those on the left to continue to shove all manner of perversion down our throats until behavior by today’s standards would be considered as being perverted behavior comes to be viewed as acceptable, thus successfully reducing this nation by yet another notch?  A line must be drawn and then strongly defended!

As a way of showing how that can happen I would like to point out how it once was that families tended to shy away from accepting government assistance, it tended to be frowned upon and even avoided if possible.  And when it was accepted it was done so with the understanding that it was only temporary and would come to an end as quickly as possible.  Because it was seen indicating that a man was unable to properly provide for his family.  But today no such reluctance exists.  These days there is almost an eagerness to go onto any kind of government ‘assistance.’



It’s in this the latest installment of our continuing series, ‘The Gas Bag Chronicles, starring Steny Hoyer’ that I seek the answer to an all important question: “What is it, do you think, that has caused the Democrat Party to go through such a startling metamorphosis where it has gone from the party of JFK and ‘Scoop’ Jackson to ending up where it has now as nothing more than a rather odd assortment of some of the most warped, depraved, twisted and pervert individuals that make up, today, the party of Barry “Almighty?”  Was there some specific event, or series of events, that we can point to as being the cause, or was it simply something that occurred gradually over time?

Which brings me to the primary player in this little saga of mine, none other than Steny Hoyer, who is one of our guys in the House and is someone who represents those in the People’s Republic of Maryland.  Now it was just yesterday that old Steny was heard to declare that people “ought to be able to use the restroom of the gender they identify with.”  Now don’t you have to wonder, at least a little bit, about the moral character of someone who could so casually say such a blatantly idiotic thing, and also be able to maintain a straight face while doing so?  Personally it would seem to indicate, at least to me, just how far into the gutter both he and his party have now managed to descend.

Hoyer was asked during his weekly little get together with those in the press there at the U.S. Capitol: “There has been a great deal of controversy lately about North Carolina’s bathroom law. Do you believe that biological males should be allowed to use the ladies’ room in federal facilities and parks around the country?”  And as is always the case with boobs like Hoyer, he chose not to directly answer the yes or no question, but instead stated his “position” on the issue.  Steny went on to say, “Look, I think the position we’ve taken is clear that people ought to be able to use the restroom of the gender they identify with. That’s been our position.” And added, “It’s still our position.”

And this so-called ‘controversial’ North Carolina law, H.B. 2, which seems to be the cause for the continuing uproar, simply states it is “an act to provide for single-sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities in schools and public agencies and to create statewide consistency in regulation of employment and public accommodations.”  It also states that those restrooms are to be used according to one’s biological sex – “the physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person’s birth certificate.”  WOW, sure sounds pretty offensive to me!  How dare the people of North Carolina support such an obviously discriminatory law! How bizarre, how bizarre!

However, the law also allows for “accommodations” to be made by allowing entities to provide single-use restrooms “upon a person’s request due to special circumstances.”  And Hoyer said he agreed with what North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, has said in that he might need to take another look at the legislation that he signed into law last month.  Hoyer said, “He certainly does.”  And he went on to say, “but there isn’t any doubt that this law was designed to be discriminatory.”  No doubt that the law was “designed to be discriminatory?”  On the contrary Steny, there is no need to “take another look” at this law, it was designed to protect the people of North Carolina from perverts to vote for Democrats!

But look, it’s far from being only the leftwing, half-baked scumbags like Steny who are so outraged over the fact that North Carolina would even dare to enact such a law.  It’s many of those in the entertainment industry who have made, and continue to make, a very loud and very concerted effort to shun North Carolina while at the same time seeming not to be bothered in the least when choosing to perform in those countries where both woman and those in the LGBT community are subjugated and abused.  So it would seem that their outrage is more than a little selective.  Personally, if I lived in North Carolina I’d be saying good riddance, who needs these unsavory characters just because they can sing a song.

But besides those in Show Biz, businesses have also gone off the deep end.  It was announced not all that long ago that PayPal had withdrawn its plans to put a global HQ there in North Carolina.  That despite the fact that this is not a law that was passed for the sake of hating transgendered individuals, but in an effort to keep women and girls safe from the growing Democrat ‘sicko’ voting bloc. Transgender activists claim that no transgendered individual has ever assaulted anyone in the history of ever. Media Matters also likes to claim that the idea of a transgendered bathroom predator was long ago debunked, quoting a group of morons appearing on the Daily Show.  Now there’s a questionable ‘news’ source!

The obvious purpose of this new law is to prevent perverts from freely gaining access to women at their most vulnerable, by pretending to be transgendered.  To anyone, no matter how they identify, this would seem like a commonsense idea. But I guess Steny is fine with some freak dressed as women using the can alongside his wife, daughter or granddaughter?  Or is it just us little people who must be forced into tolerating such perverted behavior?   So for all you folks who view this sort of thing as being no big deal, and you’re ok with a man being in the restroom with your wife, mother, or daughter, then make sure to vote Democrat.  All others can feel free to vote against those who are so accepting of such morally reprehensible behavior.

And what should it tell you about those who are so desperate to gain and then to maintain their political power that they will not hesitate in the least in abandoning all that is moral and welcome in with open arms those who insist upon taking part in disgusting behavior, no matter how perverted, as long as those exhibiting that behavior pledge their allegiance to those who are members of the Democrat Party.  To openly condone such behavior under the guise of inclusivity is really quite pathetic to say nothing of it being blatantly political.  But that’s where we are with today’s Democrat Party. It’s no longer about what’s best for the country, only what’s best for the party in being able to achieve its goal of destroying America.