So, riddle me this, “What’s the only thing faster than a speeding bullet?”  And while I am not referring to any superhero, what I am referring to is the willingness, or dare I say eagerness, of supposed journalists to jump the ‘gun’ (no pun intended) and begin to assign blame before knowing any of the facts.  Here we have yet another instance where our state-controlled media demonstrated an affection for committing journalistic malpractice as they sought to report on what they assumed to be another mass shooting, choosing to rely on early, and what would prove to be highly inaccurate, information.  And in so doing national outlets reported that a shooter was loose on campus at Ohio State.  In reality, 18-year old Abdul Razak Ali Artan attacked and injured 11 students using both a butcher knife and his Honda Civic.

But rather than to waste time waiting for all the facts to be known before rushing to judgement, as is usually the case, members of our esteemed state-controlled media quickly jumped into action and typed up who it was that they perceived as being the obvious villain here.  And that was, of course, firearms owners and organizations like the NRA who oppose increased gun regulation.  And it was even before first responders had sounded the all clear that Vox had labeled the ambush “the Ohio State shooting.”  Yahoo News took the next step, reporting that the attack “spurs a look at Ohio gun laws.”  And pundits all across the Twittersphere blamed the American gun culture for yet another mass shooting that had never happened.  This is what my dear old Dad used to call, “Shooting from the hip.”

And then when Ohio Gov. John Kasich tweeted that “our hearts and prayers go out to the Ohio State University,” it was a rather snarky Cosmo editor, Amy Odell, who apparently thought it would be a good idea to take a completely unnecessary potshot at the Republican.  And so it was this genius that replied, “Well, now’s a good time to review your stance on gun control.”  Now as it just so happens it turns out that one person actually did have a firearm on campus on Monday, it just wasn’t the attacker.  It was Officer Alan Horujko, the guy who shot Artan bring to an ended his terrorist rampage.  Ultimately, it was the good guy with a gun who stopped the bad guy armed with a butcher knife.  In the process, he saved countless students from harm.  But that wasn’t enough to slow anti-gun hysteria.

And in what I guess was an attempt at being clever, Dan Gross, the president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, remarked, “Thank God he didn’t have a gun.”  Atta boy Dan, you’re a genuine douche bag!  And it was before that we heard from Adam Feldman of, where else but, the New York Times who actually gave thanks that eight still-recovering students had ‘only been hacked with a butcher’s cleaver’.  This moron, Feldman, tweeted, “What’s happened at Ohio State is terrible.”  And then added, “But ‘mass stabber leaves 8 people with non-life-threatening injuries’ is why gun control matters.”  Huh?  I guess that’s what must be commonly referred to as being ‘Liberal Logic?’  Because that idiotic statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  And who but a liberal thinks this way?

The actual crime data, which proves false any relationship between gun ownership and gun crime, rarely makes the nightly news.  It’s only when a story bleeds, and fits an anti-gun narrative, does it ever lead. That’s a problem because it deliberately misleads the electorate.  Of course mistakes do happen in journalism. The industry has an entire orthodoxy and doctrine on corrections and retractions.  But after Monday’s attack it’s clear that many in the media were far more interested in advancing a narrative than they were in reporting on what actually happened.  Why else would Vox have an entire section about mass shootings locked and loaded on their front page hours after the attack?  Because they let their bias overshadow the facts.  But this time they got burned, and rather badly.

And based on their reading early and inaccurate reports, two Democrat senators doubled down on their calls for more gun control.  Chris Murphy complained that after the Ohio State shooting there had been one attack per week.  Once it was clear a gun had not been used, Murphy was quick to delete his tweet.  And it was Timmy Kaine who also leapt to Twitter minutes after the attack was reported in an attempt to turn the attack into a discussion on gun control by tweeting out a message reading, “Deeply saddened by the senseless act of gun violence at Ohio State this morning. Praying for the injured and the entire Buckeye community.”   But he earned for himself a little embarrassment when, a few hours later, it was revealed that the attacker used a car and a knife, but no gun.

Both of these stellar Democrats are avid supporters of increased gun control, so therefore their knee jerk response to this tragedy should come as no surprise.  And, you know, all they really succeeded in doing was to make themselves appear as a couple of spineless political opportunists.  And Twitter users were just as quick to take failed Democrat vice presidential candidate Kaine to task for politicizing the attack before he had any of the facts at hand.  Some accused him of trying to use a crime to push his anti-gun agenda, while others pointed out how during the recent presidential campaign Timmy and Hitlery both had claimed Trump was unfit because he often spoke without knowing the facts.  But the voters let it be known who it was that THEY thought was unfit, and it appears the voters were right.

One response to Timmy’s idiotic Tweet said, “The only guns used were by the police. Try and confirm before you politicize.”  And another said, “You criticized Trump for making statements before receiving all the facts. News just confirmed killer used car and knife. No gun.”  And still another said, “Deeply saddened by your senseless statement on gun violence in response to a knife attack by a Somali suspect.”  And about two hours later, Timmy tweeted a second message reading, “Updated reports say attacker used a vehicle & knife. Horrifying & senseless. Relieved the scene is secure & praying for victims’ recovery.”  Perhaps Timmy should have waited just a bit to hear more of the facts before shooting off his big fat mouth.  In doing what he did he only came across as being someone who can’t be trusted to tell the truth.

And have you ever noticed how it is that Democrats, and right down to the very last one, seem to be completely unable to differentiate between an attack by someone who identifies himself, or in some cases herself, as a soldier of Allah (terrorism) and an attack perpetrated by some generic, and usually a liberal, nutball.  It seems as if their first response is always to blame guns, as well as law abiding gun owners, for all society’s ills or to whine about how it was that the majority of Americans simply don’t buy into their propaganda that stricter gun laws would fix everything.  And maybe if Hitlery had not been the worst corrupt candidate to ever run for president, Timmy might have actually received the level of scrutiny that he deserved for being such a leftist douchebag.

And you know, with the current state of the Democrat Party being what it is, I wouldn’t be the least surprised to see this halfwit, Timmy, trying to make a run for President on his own come 2020.  And to think that this guy could very well have been our vice president, and possibly even our president had Hitlery won and then gone on to croak while still in office is a pretty scary thought.  But luckily for us God was still watching out for our country and thankfully he had not yet chosen to abandon us and therefore allowed us, recounts notwithstanding, to dodge a rather sizable bullet that was headed right between our eyes.  Our country would have never survived a Hiterly presidency and God, in his infinite wisdom, knew that.  But what this latest tragedy makes clear is that we believe the Democrats and the media at our own peril.




When it comes to the Democrat Party, while the faces may change every decade or so, over time the effort to shove down the collective throat of the American people the party’s leftist ideology changes very little except, perhaps, to intensify.  Democrats have always been very fond of lecturing us all about how more sophisticated they are, more worldly they are but especially how much smarter they are, than ‘We the People.’  And while they rarely if ever talk about how corrupt they are or how dishonest they are, they do talk a great deal about how it is that they only have the best interests of the American people at heart.

And so concerned were those on the Left about whether President-elect Donald Trump would “accept” the results of the presidential election should he have lost, and yet what is it that we are we witnessing today?  Leftists are the biggest hypocrites, and sore losers as well.  What we have now going on is really nothing more than an attempt to undermine Trump’s presidency at any and all costs.  I guess I’m a bit confused on why it is that more Americans are never able to grasp that when it comes to the Democrats it’s NEVER about the country, it’s only about them and their ability to garner for themselves as much political power as possible.

After Trump announced that he wouldn’t be moving forward with efforts to prosecute Hitlery, because of not wanting to “hurt her” and her family, it was announced that failed presidential candidate Hitlery will now join forces with that other loser, Jill Stein, for a futile recount in the States of Wisconsin, and likely Pennsylvania and Michigan, too.  The Washington Post reports that our dynamic duo are simply concerned whether there was any “outside interference” to sway the election results.  Ironic, coming from a Democrat Machine that couldn’t subsist without the help of pretty massive voter fraud.  Yes, truth is stranger than fiction.

And then enter from ‘stage left’, of course, is Hitlery’s campaign lawyer, some Soros funded hack by the name of Marc Elias, who was quoted in the blog Medium as saying they’d received “hundreds of messages, emails, and calls urging us to do something, anything, to investigate claims that the election results were hacked and altered in a way to disadvantage Secretary Clinton.”  The combined margin of victory for Trump, Elias maintains, “was merely 107,000 votes.”  Yet Elias also admits that the campaign has “not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,” adding:

…because of the degree of apparent foreign interference during the campaign — Elias said that Clinton officials had “quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibility of outside interference in the vote tally in these critical battleground states.”

He said that the Clinton campaign would participate in the Stein-initiated recount in Wisconsin by having representatives on the ground monitoring the count and having lawyers represent them in court if needed. And if Stein made good on efforts to prompt similar processes in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Elias said, the Clinton campaign would do so there, as well.

“The campaign is grateful to all those who have expended time and effort to investigate various claims of abnormalities and irregularities,” Elias said. “While that effort has not, in our view, resulted in evidence of manipulation of results, now that a recount is underway, we believe we have an obligation to the more than 64 million Americans who cast ballots for Hillary Clinton to participate in ongoing proceedings to ensure that an accurate vote count will be reported.”

Is he, like, serious?  Because as we all know, or should know by now, the Left has always been very good at accusing the Right of that which it is guilty of a thousand-fold.  What’s more, independent watchdog groups have begun circulating reports that as many as three million voters who cast their ballots in the 2016 presidential election were not actually citizens. This would mean Hitlery’s so-called popular vote victory is too, null and void.  Because let’s face it, it’s a pretty safe bet that anyone who voted illegally, in all likelihood, voted for Hitlery.  Somehow I don’t see that there would be many illegals who would have voted for Trump.

And it was with this in mind that President-elect Trump tweeted: “I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally … serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California.”   As usual, there is little intellectual consistency with the Left.  After all, when a Democrat insinuates voter fraud is at play it’s considered wholly plausible and democratic of them to call for a recount.  However, when conservatives call into question the legitimacy of certain voters due to evidence that leaves very little doubt, they are deemed “conspiracy theorists” who seek nothing more than “undermine” our democracy.

And it has since been reported that ‘True the Vote’ recently released a statement which said in part, “True the Vote absolutely supports President-elect Trump’s recent comment about the impact of illegal voting, as reflected in the national popular vote. We are still collecting data and will be for several months, but our intent is to publish a comprehensive study on the significant impact of illegal voting in all of its many forms and begin a national discussion on how voters, states, and the Trump Administration can best address this growing problem.”  But I think we can all agree that this would be a discussion the Democrats would prefer not to have.

So what’s really behind Hitlery’s recount effort besides pointless bloviating and clinging to relevance?  Even the Leftist Washington Post cedes that, given the wide margin by which Trump won, it is highly “unusual” and that Hitlery “has virtually no chance of altering the result.”   As The American Thinker’s Richard Baehr notes, “if the recounts are done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.”  He then went on to say, “If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270. Then this goes to Congress.”

In that end, the House would elect Trump and the Senate would do the same for Mike Pence.  Then, he posits, Democrats could say, and most likely would say, Congress selected our president and that he was not installed by the will of the American people.   As always, there is method to these Alinksyites’ madness — and that is to delegitimize Donald Trump any possible way they can.  And they make the claim that it’s really about the allaying of fears from those who somehow worry about outside interference, but that’s really nothing more than a smokescreen cast in their effort to keep prying eyes away from what’s really going on here.

Ms. Stein is doing everything she can to get that faux glass ceiling broken, most likely at the encouragement of Hitlery, albeit under the radar.  That way Hitlery is able to keep her fingerprints off all the shenanigans.  The Democrats did a recall election in Wisconsin was against Scott Walker in 2012 and failed, and they will also fail this time around.  And with Hitlery having three million noncitizens vote for her, so much for the popular vote being in her favor.  To Ms. Stein I would simply say, isn’t it time you let the election results stand, hightail it back to North Dakota, and spray paint a bulldozer or two when protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline.

And I seem to recall in 2008 when Hitlery was cackling like a mad hen when Barry shoved her aside.  I also remember all those dead Democrats who rose up from the grave to vote for Barry. And when we called out the voter fraud they said shut up!  You lost, deal with it!  Now that Trump beat Hitlery, she and that idiot Stein are crying boo hoo hoo!  And we even have Electoral College voters getting death threats if they didn’t change their vote to Hitlery.  Mighty democratic and utopian of them?  Vote how I say or I’ll kill you?  Those on the left should be told to follow their own advice, shut up, you lost!  Suck it up, buttercup!

Look, all any of this recount nonsense proves is that it’s true what we’ve always heard about Hitlery, that she would try to win the presidency at any and all costs.  You see, she’s one of those folks who actually believes she deserves to be president, that it’s somehow owed to her for all she has done for us.  Ya I know, right?  How nutty is that?  Well the true colors are once again being shown as the veneer of civility and tolerance have again been stripped away to such an extent that even the blind should now be able to see the vindictive pettiness that has come to so thoroughly permeate the modern day Democrat Party.  When will people learn?



Does anyone remember how it was, during the last presidential debate back in October, that Hitlery literally had a cow when Donald Trump would not commit to honoring the results of our then yet to be conducted presidential election.  She actually went so far as to say that by doing so he would be “undermining the pillar of our democracy.”  So I am guessing that what was at least being implied at the time was that there was to be doubt that Hitlery, or she who it was thought would be kicking Donald’s ass, would most certainly abide by the will of the people.

Because from after that last debate to right up until she was finally forced to concede, Hitlery, as well as those on her team, had thought she had this thing won.  And won by a significant margin.  So while accusing Trump of risking our democracy by choosing to leave some doubt about his willingness to accept the outcome, she was more than a little confident that she would be having little problem with accepting it because she was going to crush him. Unfortunately something totally unexpected, at least by Hitlery and her team, occurred that changed everything.  She lost.

So now that Hitlery’s campaign lawyer has announced plans to participate in vote recounts of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan if they take place, can we say that it is she who is now guilty of “undermining the pillar of our democracy?”  And they add the rather odd caveat that they have decided to take part in this circus even though they doesn’t expect to overturn the election of Donald Trump as president.  Then why bother doing it?  Why choose to put the country through this if you doubt doing so will actually alter the outcome?  How typically Hitlery!

If Green Party candidate Jill Stein initiates recounts in all of those states as she intends, we now know that Hitlery’s campaign, “will participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,” lawyer Mark Elias said Saturday in a post on the website Medium.com.  We’re told that her campaign didn’t plan to initiate recounts on its own because it hasn’t found “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.”  But one can’t help but wonder who it is that might have put the bug in Ms. Stein’s ear.

Elias has said that no one is expecting the recounts to erase what he said was a 107,000 combined vote margin separating the candidates in the three battleground states and overturning the election of Trump.  Which takes me back to my original question of, why do it?  It’s like it’s impossible for Hitlery to exit gracefully, she seems insistent upon being viewed as someone so addicted to power that there is nothing she won’t do to acquire it.  And it very clearly demonstrates how this election had nothing to do with the country, and everything to do with her.

Elias, “We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states — Michigan — well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount.“  And it was this same boob who went on to say, “But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.”  Right, this is all based on principle.  I get it.

Elias said there also is an obligation to the voters now that a recount is planned in Wisconsin and potentially the other two states. The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Friday said it had received Stein’s petition.  Elias said, “We believe we have an obligation to the more than 64 million Americans who cast ballots for Hillary Clinton to participate in ongoing proceedings to ensure that an accurate vote count will be reported.”  So according to this guy this is really all about those who voted for Hitlery not Hitlery’s own unquenchable thirst for power.

Look, this entire charade has the look of Hitlery con-artistry all over it.  And you’re a fool if you don’t believe that they’ve been scheming on this as a contingency plan for months.  And the fact that Hitlery seems to be acting as if it’s no big deal, sending her minions out to create the impression that they are only along for the ride with Ms. Stein’s little boondoggle of a recall is absolutely ludicrous.  Hitlery now has her army of lawyers lined up and positioning themselves to attempt to fraudulently steal the election! Trump would be wise to get his lawyers there quickly!

Personally, I see Hitlery, and her team, treading on what could turn out to be pretty dangerous ground.  And the only reason things have been able to progress as far as they have is because too few understand how it is that our electoral process actually works.  All they hear is how Hitlery ‘won’ 2 million more votes than Trump, not realizing that most of those votes came from one state, California.  So this scam that Hitlery somehow got cheated is nothing more than that, a scam.  The fact is that Trump won 3,084 out of the 3,141 counties in this country.  He won!



If one were to actually take the time to look up the word ‘loser’ in the dictionary, what one would likely find there as being the perfect definition is a picture of anthem-protesting 49er Colin Kaepernick.  And does anyone seriously think that if this pathetic dirtbag was a white guy, he would be allowed to continually get away with this kind of crap?  And it’s my personal opinion that his main purpose for behaving is such a despicable manner likely has more to do with the fact that he’s a shitty quarterback.  Or maybe I’m completely wrong about the whole thing and this really is all about some perceived racial injustice, and this boob taking it upon himself to stand up for all those he views as being persecuted.  All I know is this shitbag is lucky that I’m not the owner of the team.

Anyway, it was this past Wednesday when this dweeb spoke with those in the media in advance of San Francisco’s game against the Miami Dolphins whick will take place at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami on Sunday.  Instead of the customary media conference call, this one turned into a heated political debate. Things grew testy between Kaepernick and a particular media member of Cuban descent, in regards to Kaepernick’s past wearing of a Fidel Castro t-shirt.  According to the Palm Beach Post, “When pressed about the shirt, Kaepernick first pointed out that Malcolm X also was pictured.  Kaepernick said he supports Malcolm X and his willingness to be “open-minded” before forming his own views of the world.  Part of that open-mindedness, he said, was meeting with the Cuban leader.”

The Miami Herald reporter pressed Kaepernick about Castro which prompted him to respond by saying, “I’m not talking about Fidel Castro and his oppression. I’m talking about Malcolm X and what he’s done for people.”  I am a little curious though, when it comes to what this imbecile might actually know about Malcolm X or about the civil rights movement in general.  I mean he doesn’t really come across as being all that familiar with what went on during that period but certainly seems to feel entitled when it comes to everything that was accomplished by all those who took part in that struggle.  But when it comes to being measured by the content of one’s character Kaepernick makes it very obvious that he is an individual who possess an anemic amount of personal character.

The reporter confronted Kaepernick after the quarterback did his best to steer the conversation away from the rather “uncomfortable” topic of Castro.  Kaepernick shot back, “One thing that Fidel Castro did do is they have the highest literacy rate because they invest more in their education system than they do in their prison system, which we do not do here, even though we’re fully capable of doing that.”  So, I guess the fact that there are a rather significant number of political prisoners in Cuba is nowhere near as important to this moron as is the literacy rate?   Suppose this goof was in Cuba and speaking out against that regime, where does he think he’d be likely to end up, and in pretty short order?  That kind of stuff never even occurs to mentally challenged morons like Kaepernick.

And when a reporter chose to challenge Kaepernick on Castro’s own history of breaking up families, Kaepernick responded, “We do break up families here. That’s what mass incarceration is. That was the foundation of slavery so our country has been based on that as well as the genocide of Native Americans.”  I guess I have difficult time understanding why it is that anyone with even an ounce of commonsense bothers to gives this douche bag anymore than the time of day.  Perhaps if we simply chose to ignore him, and his blatantly sophomoric behavior, he’d grow tired of it.  And, again, if it was me who was in charge of this team, he would have gotten one warning about his behavior, and if he persisted he would have been either traded or cut and sent packing to be someone else’s problem.

And then after the South Florida media cited a Sports Illustrated study which said that many fans have stopped watching the NFL because of Kaepernick’s anthem antics, he responded by simply blaming the fans.  He said, “They’re not watching football because of my stance about fighting systematic oppression and wanting the same equality and freedom for all people.”  And he added, “I would say they probably need to look in the mirror at what they value. You know, if they’re OK with people being treated unfairly, being abused, being harassed, being terrorized, then the problem is more with what they’re doing in their lives than it is about watching football games.”  Maybe this guy has taken a few too many hits to his old noggin.  He certainly doesn’t come across as being all that bright.

And while the NFL remains perfectly unwilling to stop Kaepernick’s anthem protest, by insulting huge swaths of the its fan base and suggesting that by disagreeing with his protest that it somehow makes it appear as if they agree with the harassing and terrorizing of innocent people, Kaepernick’s conduct on this phone call crosses a line that’s not protected by free speech, or any right to protest.  The NFL has a recent precedent of cracking down on players whom they believe engage in conduct insulting or offensive to people at large, or certain groups in particular. In fact, the NFL exercised that power in Miami when they suspended and fined then-Dolphins safety Don Jones for tweeting “OMG” and “horrible” after Michael Sam kissed his boyfriend on live television during the 2014 NFL Draft.

Now if the NFL can use that kind of disciplinary action against a player for, in their opinion, offending the relatively small gay community, then it can certainly exercise that same discipline against Kaepernick for his insanely-offensive rant against far larger segments of their fan base.  Again, there’s no reason to believe the league will do that. But they could if they were so inclined.  So fans of the game are left with only one way to demonstrate their dissatisfaction.  And they do that by choosing to no longer watch.  Now I know there are plenty of folks to will put tuning in to watch their favorite team above tuning out in favor of their country.  But I’m not one of those folks.  Overpaid punks like Kaepernick can feel free to make their statement, but they shouldn’t expect me to watch.

You know, in a way it’s kinda sad that the NFL continues to tolerate this piece of trash as sees absolutely nothing wrong with not only embarrassing our country, but disrespecting our flag as well as all those who paid the ultimate price in defending this country.  As it is all he does is to come across as being nothing more than an American hater.  And in so doing the NFL essentially makes itself appear just as pathetic as he is.  And yet those in charge stubbornly refuse to chastise in any meaningful way the behavior of this clown, as well as all of the clowns that have decided to join him in his rather juvenile behavior, and continue to claim that it has nothing to do with the decrease in ratings that the NFL continues to experience for the first time in its history.

When you get right down to it, it’s difficult to see Kaepernick as anything other than just another of you basic, everyday “Cafe-Communists.”  He’s like a 20 year old college student railing against the evils of capitalism while driving around in a $100,000 BMW that his parents bought him courtesy of all the fruits of, wait for it…CAPITALISM.  In Kaepernick’s case, NFL fans are the unfortunate parents of this disturbingly ungrateful child.  NFL fans made Colin Kaepernick a multimillionaire; and yet, he proceeds to spit in the face of his benefactors?  He bites the hand that feeds him?  It’s way past time free enterprise rejected this defective product.  And you know, what I really find as being a bit ironic is the fact that as quarterback he makes a much better tackling dummy.  Because he really does suck.

And one last note, remember when the Dallas Cowboys wanted to wear a small patch on their helmets to honor slain Dallas Police Officers, and the NFL nixed it?  It was just a week or so later that Kaepernick started with his childish nonsense. The NFL has showed whose side they are on.  And while I used to watch quite a bit of football when I was younger, I really don’t watch much anymore.  The only game I watched all of last season was the Super bowl and that was only because of Manning.  The game has been changed to the point where it doesn’t really interest me anymore, and there are no longer any players like there were in the old days.  Guys like Bradshaw, Butkus, Page, Montana, Harris or Tarkenton to name just a few.  Now you have way too many punks like this jerk-off Kaepernick.



You can say what you want about Richard Nixon, but when many at the time were encouraging him to contest the election of 1960, he chose to put the country above his own political ambition and ignored those calls choosing instead to simply move on.  Fast forward 56 years and we now have the Democrat candidate in our most recent presidential contest being urged by a group of computer scientists and election lawyers to challenge the election results in three key swing states won by President-elect Donald Trump.  Because, they say, how is it that a candidate as qualified as Hitlery could have lost without there being electoral trickery being involved?

Apparently members of this group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, has already had a conversation with Hitlery’s campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias as recently as recently as Thursday of last week.  And what was supposedly discussed is the fact that they believe they have evidence that would indicate some results in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania ‘might’ have been manipulated or even hacked.  So there’s no proof that they were hacked, only speculation that they might have been.

According to the findings of these supposed ‘experts’, Hitlery received 7 percent fewer votes in Wisconsin counties that used electronic voting machines as she did in counties that used optical scanners to read paper ballots.  Now as their theory goes, if, by chance, those votes were changed to match the percentages in the rest of the state Hitlery ‘could’ have received an extra 30,000 votes – and she lost Wisconsin by only 27,000.  Now seriously, does anyone seem to recall hearing about any instances of voting machines changing Hitlery votes to Trump votes?  I know I don’t!  All I heard about were machines changing Trump votes to Hitlery votes.

And while this same group noted it has found no actual evidence of votes being manipulated in such a way, it said their analysis should be considered as cause enough for an independent review, noting that many in Barry’s administration, including Barry himself, have blamed the Russian government for the hacking of Democrat National Committee emails.  So based on some vague accusation against the Russians this group bases its nutting conclusion that there is now sufficient cause for Hitlery’s team to start demanding recounts in those states where she was narrowly defeated?  Sounds like more than a little straw grasping of you ask me.

Look, as things stand right now Mr. Trump currently has 290 Electoral College votes and Hitlery has 232.  And as we all know a total of 270 is needed to win, so an overturning of Wisconsin with 10 electoral votes and Pennsylvania with 20 would get her to 262.  Michigan’s 16 electoral votes would put her over the top. That state still has not awarded its votes as the vote counting is still too close to call.  However, if Hitlery is going to choose to challenge the election results in these states, she is rapidly running out of time as the deadline is approaching.  Wisconsin requires a recount request by Friday, Pennsylvania on Monday, and Michigan by November 30.

And no one should be surprised to hear she is contemplating such a move, an act of pure desperation.  It has been after any number of elections that we have witnessed the Democrats using all manner of con artistry and election trickery in an effort to get their way.  They are liars, thieves, and they are cheats.  They are simply not worthy of the trust placed in them by so many Americans.  After all, once again we see them doing nothing more than trying to overthrow an election using cleverly devised false accusations. They need to be recognized for what they are, anti-America zealots and as such should never again be elected in numbers large enough to allow them to!

Why is it that the Democrats so stubbornly resist the enactment of voter ID laws?  Do anyone actually believe it’s because these laws are designed to disenfranchise people from voting?  No, it’s because it would it harder for them to cheat!  Let’s face it, it’s been determined, though I’m not quite sure how, that three million illegal immigrants voted in this election.  And I think it safe to say, if that is in fact the case, that the vast majority of those votes went to Hitlery.  So if we were to remove those three million illegally cast votes, plus any other votes determined to be fraudulent, Trump would then, and very easily so, be the winner in the popular vote as well.

Getting back to the “win the popular vote/lose the Electoral College” scenario:  Thank God we have that, otherwise our president would consistently be elected by the same handful of states.  It would be California, New York, Florida and Texas who determine the outcome of every presidential election.   But the Electoral College brilliantly smooths out the variances in the voting proclivities among states and regions.  Farmers in the middle of the country and importers and exporters on the shore get roughly equal say, as do Madison Avenue bigwigs and factory workers in Tennessee.  It makes the playing field much more level than it would otherwise be.

Are there shortcomings? Sure, I suppose you can make that point. The Electoral College can make an Republican vote essentially meaningless in a very few heavily Democrat states or vice versa.  But without the Electoral College, the country’s entire population is subject to the disproportionate voting preferences of the few most populous states!  A “disproportionate voting preference by and of the few most populous states” is called (and was correctly and most appropriately considered by our founders as) a “tyranny by the majority”… (See de Tocqueville).  You have to admit, if you’re being honest, that it makes for a much fairer election outcome.

That’s what happens in “pure” democratically-based, “rule by the majority” countries. And that’s why our Founding Fathers determined that an “Electoral College” was needed.  I’m glad that I live in a “Constitutional Republic” and not in a pure democracy.  If it hadn’t been so we wouldn’t have seen a Republican President since the days of Ronald Reagan.  And while I’m quite sure my Democrat friends who nothing wrong with that should maybe think back to, or do research on, the Carter presidency, or take an honest look at what has taken place over the last eight years and imagine what America would look like if every president were as incompetent as these two.



As I have likely said before, not that it makes much difference at this point, when the process of electing a new president first began, a process that seems to have gone on for far longer than it really has, I was pretty firmly in the camp of Ted Cruz.  But as the campaign continued and it became obvious that Trump was going to be more than just a flash in the pan, the change that came about in both Cruz’s demeanor, as well as his tactics, caused to me to question by decision to support him.  That said, I did vote for him in my state’s primary while the other two members of my immediate family went with Trump.  And as time went by and 17 was reduced to 15 then to 12 and to 3 then 2 and finally to 1 candidate, I was then forced into a decision that I never thought I would be making.  And since I could not imagine myself sitting out what I still see as the most important election in my lifetime, I chose to, still somewhat reluctantly, to climb on board the ‘Trump Train.’

Now with all the being said, while I do not regret my decision to do so, my biggest issue with Trump then, remains my biggest issue still.  And that is the issue of trust.  We have had a president for the last eight year who, time after time after time, gave us reason after reason not to trust him.  And in candidate Trump I was looking for someone who I could, and without any reservation, bring myself to trust.  And I want to be able to trust Mr. Trump to do the things that he said he would do.  Now I’m not naïve enough to think that he’ll be able to do everything, but he must do all that he can.  So if Mr. Trump, chooses not to keep the promises he made to those who supported him throughout his campaign, or fails to continue to rid the country of political correctness and the liberal initiatives, then he will be a one term president because his supporters, including myself, will abandon him as just another establishment type who blew smoke to the American people.

Trust me when I say that I want nothing more than to see President Trump succeed, and to succeed in a very big way.  Actually, mere words cannot describe how much I want him to succeed.  And as word has now come that he doesn’t intend on prosecuting Hitlery, while I disagree with his decision, I can, in a way, understand it.  But he needs to understand this, that he has now gotten the only ‘freebee’ that he’s going to be getting from me, and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet.  Granted, I’m pretty sure that Mr. Trump would be unlikely to consider me as being someone who he needs to be taking advice from, but I’ve never been shy when it comes to handing out free advice.  However, it was millions like myself who made it possible for Mr. Trump to win and it is us with whom he needs to make sure to follow through.  He ran as being an outsider, and he needs to remain true to that outsider philosophy.  So it’s to our President-elect that I would just like to say:

  1. Relax. The campaign is over. And it was pretty brutal, pretty much from start to finish. But it’s over now; you won, and won against what many had said were some pretty formidable odds. The entire establishment was arrayed against you and did everything they could to vilify you.  Regarding the ‘Establishment Republicans’, you were viewed as being a direct threat to their fiefdoms, so they were compelled to try to destroy you.  When they failed, most headed for the tall grass rather than to support you, and now, of course, it’s quite the different story.  So make ’em squirm.

And then we have the Democrat establishment types.  Even better.  Because when the swamp is finally drained, they’re headed down the commode with the rest of the sewage, and they know it.  Enjoy the scene.  Relish it.  It will be like something out of “Night of the Living Dead,” except in this case the zombies that have been feasting on America will be headed over a cliff.

Hollywood?  Academia?  They won’t be able to build safe spaces fast enough, or large enough for this pathetic crowd.  In fact, they’ll probably come to you for infrastructure funding.  Resist.  Suggest they work out their aggressions with therapeutic wall-building.

  1. Laugh. Because there is nothing that infuriates those on the left more than to see someone who not only is not intimidated by them but also bursts out laughing at them whenever attacked. So do it and watch your popularity soar.  It won’t be just that supposedly “angry” base that will chuckle along.  This will transcend your base.  Your political enemies in Washington will attack you viciously and personally.  Don’t take the bait.  Go Reagan and laugh at them.  You will bring millions to your side.  The enemy of my enemy is my friend, especially when my friend is ridiculing my enemy.
  2. Pick and choose your TV spots. Barry “Almighty” could safely navigate TV at will because the entertainment industry unanimously slobbered all over him, unlike any president in modern history. Trust me when I say that that ain’t gonna happen with you. The Stephen Colberts and Bill Mahers despise you and will low-blow you at every opportunity.  Refuse their invitations for appearances.  More importantly, demand that no one in your administration give these leftists the time of day.  That said, there are those in that industry who will poke fun at you without the ugly edge — Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, etc.  You’ve shown a thick skin with them.  Keep it up. Take a page from President George H. W. Bush.  No one laughed harder at Dana Carvey’s devastating impersonation of him, and that was at the White House with Carvey as his guest.
  3. And please, stop tweeting! You were right to say that tweeting is a terrific way to communicate directly with the American people. You showed your marketing brilliance by employing this weapon before anyone. It worked beautifully for you.  But enough already.  You’re the president-elect now. It’s so beneath the office!  It’s sad!  The public expects leadership and gravitas.  It could be embarrassing! You don’t need to use this medium.  It’s unnecessary!  When you need to say something formally, let your staff release a statement.  Want to personalize that statement? Conduct an interview. You’ll never disappoint.
  4. Pay attention to the experts — NOT. The editors at The New York Times and the Washington Post have serious thoughts on the direction your administration should take. There are profound ideas coming from seasoned political observers at PBS and NPR. I know it doesn’t appear this way, but the anchors (and producers and reporters and executives) at NBC, ABC and CBS do want to help. By all means, have them in for a chat.  Hear them out. Then laugh out loud while you throw them out.  Watch as they pull out their cellphones on the sidewalk to furiously tweet their feelings to the world: “@realDonaldTrump hurt our feelings! #needasafespace! #whereismygriefcounselor? Sad!”

And finally I would like to offer just one final suggestion to our President-elect:

  1. You were elected primarily on the basis of being a POLITICAL OUTSIDER, and by choosing now not to follow through with the promise to prosecute the Clinton Mob, you’re likely to end up looking like a – POLITICAL INSIDER. And like I said earlier, while I disagree with the decision, I guess I can understand it.  But there is most definitely a limit to my generosity, and the millions of those like me, and it would be wise to keep that in mind.  The ball is now in your court.  We will be watching, we have put all our faith in you, and we have some pretty high expectations.

So, for whatever it’s worth, that’s all I have to say.  Expectations are now very high for President Trump, at least from those of us who voted for him.  After eight years of Barry ‘O’, Mr. Trump now has a very long way to go and relatively short time to get there.  So it will be important for him to hit the deck running.  Because if he hasn’t made what voters will come to judge as significant progress within the next two years, or when the next midterm elections roll around, he can fully expect to see the Republicans lose control of one or perhaps both houses of Congress.  So he needs to get on the stick right out of the gate and drag, kicking and screaming if necessary, his Republican majorities in Congress right along with him.  Time is of the absolute essence and he has quite the mess to clean up.  Barry once said that it was the Republicans who had put America in the ditch, well if that’s the case, Barry has buried us up to our collective neck in quicksand.  And we’re sinking fast.



As further proof, as if we needed any, of just how upside down things have become in this country over the course of the last eight years during the reign of Barry the first, as well as something that can, I think, be considered as another pretty good indicator of why we now have a President-elect Trump instead of a President-elect Hitlery, is the fact that word now comes to us that the Denver County’s sheriff office has been slapped with a fine by Barry’s Department of Justice (DOJ) simply because it refused to hire…wait for it…non-citizens as deputies.  Now is that not the most insane thing you have ever heard?  Even when taking into consideration all that has now taken place under our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’, Barack Hussein Obama, this has to rank pretty high up on the list of the lunatic actions taken by our soon to be EX-president.  It seems nonsensical that citizenship would not be a requirement for a job in law enforcement.

So, how can this be, you might ask.  Well, as has so often been said over the course of the last eight years, truth is stranger than fiction.  It seems that from the beginning of 2015 through this past March, the Denver Sheriff Department went on what was described as a major hiring binge, adding more than 200 new deputies.  But those jobs ended up only going to citizens, because the department made citizenship a stated requirement on the job application.  Imagine that!  The department admitted as much in a new settlement with the U.S. government, which now requires that it pay a $10,000 fine.  But it doesn’t stop there, the department will also have to comb through all of its job applications from the past two years, identifying illegal immigrants who were excluded from the hiring process, receive training from the DOJ and be forced to have their hiring policies reviewed by an attorney in the Civil Rights Division.

And it was some DOJ imbecile by the name of Vanita Gupta, who has the fancy title of ‘Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General’, who said in a recent statement: “Eliminating this unlawful citizenship requirement will help ensure that the Denver Sheriff Department hires the best and most qualified individuals to protect and serve.”   And it was this same moron who went on to say, “The entire community will benefit from these reforms.”  Apparently, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, employers are required to give equal treatment to non-citizens with valid work permits, unless state, local, or federal law explicitly requires certain jobs be open only to citizens. More than 40 U.S. states currently have laws that in some capacity restrict non-citizens from being police, but Colorado is not one of them.  Such is the level of insanity that has reigned supreme during the tenure of Barry “Almighty”.

And while the department says it was simply unaware that limiting employment to citizens was a violation of federal law, that excuse apparently didn’t hold much water with the DOJ.  Because it was in a report released last October that the Department of Justice blasted citizenship requirements for officers as a “barrier” to creating more racially diverse police forces.  This report said, “While Federal law allows law enforcement agencies to impose a citizenship requirement where it is authorized by state or local law, this requirement may prevent a considerable number of racial and ethnic minorities – many of whom have valuable foreign language skills – from being hired by law enforcement agencies.”  Yup, by golly, that’s what we need and what’s most important when it comes to the safety of our communities, a “more racially diverse police force.”  It’s like every morning I wake up in the damn ‘Twilight Zone.”

That the Denver Sheriff’s Department, or any police department for that matter, can be fined by our ‘all knowing and all seeing’ federal government for not allowing non-citizens to apply to be a member of law enforcement is just plain nuts.  It ranks right up there with allowing those who are citizens of this country, even if here illegally, to be able to take advantage of in-state college tuition.  Maybe I’m over simplifying things here, but who in their right mind thinks it’s a good idea that someone who is not a citizen of this country should have any business whatsoever being permitted to have any position in law enforcement?  Now I realize that in this the ‘Age of Obama” that the police, much like the military, have become something to be treated more like a Petri Dish for social experimentation than what they are intended to be.  But is that really the direction in which most Americans want us to be going?  Somehow I just don’t think so.

Governor John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, has just about destroyed the once great state of Colorado. There’s a ban on smoking cigarettes, but smoking pot is okay.  Three-year-olds can sit a room full of Marijuana smoke and even eat a pot brownie now and then.  Five year olds have to learn the difference between a penis and a vagina in their kindergarten classes, but not about number and letters.  A seven year old asthmatic can’t be around cigarette smoke, but pot smoke apparently doesn’t bother their fragile little lungs.  There are hundreds of two bedroom homes that house between two and five illegal families.  They all have the same Social Security number and many have the same name.  All of them are collecting Social Security checks under their identical numbers. Of course, attorneys continue to fight for their Social Security rights because the government pays $5,000 to the attorney whenever these individuals are granted their Social Security.

Yup, that all sounds pretty good to me, NOT!  So I guess we’re all just supposed to let lawlessness, child endangerment, and the hiring of illegals as deputies to take place and if we object we’re considered as what, racists?  So can Colorado now be considered to have been turned into a regular little Democrat utopia?  But I do have a question, will these illegal immigrant Deputies be allowed to carry a weapon?  And if so, how freaking nuts is that?  And these days I can’t help but wonder if everybody in Colorado, to one degree or another, isn’t a pothead which, I guess, would help to explain how it’s become such a pretty reliable blue state, at least in presidential politics.  Maybe more conservatives should move there and change the demographics. Though they may be hard pressed to get any decent law abiding citizens to move there. I feel sorry for the ones already living under such a horrible administration.

Ya know when Barry first came into office, he did so as a man on a mission, and he made every American aware of what that mission was.  It was to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America.  And it would be difficult to argue, as he prepares himself to finally leave office, that he hasn’t made some pretty significant progress in that endeavor.  Even with the Republicans in control of the House since 2010 and both the House and the Senate since 2014.  Much to the chagrin, with a great deal of disappointment, of those who love this country.  We’ve been made to watch our country being destroyed right before our eyes while those we elected to prevent it did little more than to watch from the sidelines while sitting on their hands.  So feeling like we were left with no alternative we voted for President-elect Donald Trump and now we wait to see if he’ll make good on the promise he made to, “Make America Great Again!”