DE NIRO ONCE AGAIN CRAWLS OUT OF THE HARVEYWOOD SEWER…

De Niro 4

Let’s face it, these Hollyweird types are, without a doubt, a hopelessly dishonest and very classless bunch.  They continue to prove, on nearly a daily basis, that just because one may have a lot money, it doesn’t necessarily equate to possessing any amount of class.  And when this band of morally bankrupt scum-buckets continues with their steady stream of increasingly outrageous attacks on our President, it makes those of us who voted for him feel all the more confident that we truly did make the right choice.

Which brings me to one of the more vocal of the Trump haters, ‘Little Bobby’ De Niro.  I’m pretty sure that most folks are well aware of the fact that old Bobby is far from being a supporter of our president.  And just in case there were those who were not aware of that fact, Bobby took a recent opportunity to remind everyone during a ‘charity’ speech this past Thursday when he again attacked President Trump, describing him as a “lowlife” and banning the president from sitting on a park bench dedicated to himself.

This time Bobby’s rant took place at the Annual Hudson River Park Gala and it was there he said, “One of my pleasures will be keeping people off my bench who don’t deserve a view of the park like Donald Trump.”  And I guess it was just for good measure that he went onto add, “F**k you, Donald Trump. It’s a horror with this motherf**ker.”  And it was from there that he went on to describe President Trump as a “low life.”  Now if one were to go looking for the perfect example of a lowlife, there is no better example than Bobby.

Bobby proves my point courtesy of his repeated attacks and threats made against President Trump, today as well as during the run-up to last year’s presidential election when he went so far as to say he would like to “punch him in the face.”  It was then in a video that Bobby said, “I mean, he’s so blatantly stupid. He’s a punk, he’s a dog, he’s a pig, he’s a con, he’s a bullsh*t artist, a mutt who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, doesn’t do his homework, doesn’t care, thinks he’s gaming society, doesn’t pay his taxes.”

And it was in that very same video that Bobby was heard to say, “He’s an embarrassment to this country.  He talks [about] how he wants to punch people in the face… I’d like to punch him in the face.”  And the fact that President Trump actually won the election over Bobby’s favored candidate of choice seems only to have driven him closer to the edge.  Because as recently as this past August, Bobby again attacked President Trump, describing him as a “blatant racist” whose days in the White House are numbered.

It was then during an interview that Bobby said, “He’s dangerous as it is.”  And then went on to say, “He’s terrible, and a flat-out blatant racist and doubling down on that, and it’s good that he does because he’s going to sink himself.”  And yet Bobby has, so far, refused to comment regarding his friend Harvey Weinstein and the escalating sexual harassment scandal surrounding the now disgraced producer.  The Daily News noted that Bobby said he hadn’t spoken to Weinstein since the scandal first broke.  Really?

I must admit that I am more than a bit confused over how it is that Bobby can have no problem whatsoever with speaking of the president in such a manner while at the same time refusing to utter so much as a word about Harvey Weinstein.  I can only assume that Bobby must care very little about Harvey’s victims, as he goes about coming up with new accusations to make against President Trump.  Keep crying Bobby.  You’re now the poster-boy for Harvey Hypocrisy!  I can’t wait to watch Bobby’s head explode after Trump’s 2020 victory.

And I love the double-standard under which people like Bobby feel entitled to operate.  They can allow 30 years to go by, knowing full well what their favorite pervert, Harvey Weinstein, is up to and never utter a word.  And yet, at the same time, they view as being acceptable their constant haranguing of our president.  And with the number of allegations that have now surfaced, and that continue to surface, I think it’s fair to ask how was it that no one within Weinstein’s circle of ‘friends’ knew nothing of his sick behavior?

And I’d be willing to bet that not only did most of these rich and powerful elites, like Bobby, know about it, but most of them also very likely followed Harvey’s perverted example by exploiting those around them, and in much the same manner that Weinstein did.  Look at the disgusting Ben Affleck video that surfaced last week.  Money and power corrupt, and in the upper echelons of Hollyweird, a man is free to become as corrupt and perverted as he may wish, knowing full well that he won’t be ‘exposed’ by his friends.

Personally I’m glad that the Democrats prefer to associate themselves with all of these perverted celebrities.  Patriotic, God fearing, Americans who love this country will vote for those who support President Trump in 2018 and again for the man himself in 2020.  It’s obvious that those who don’t like President Trump also don’t really care about America.  They hate the president because all he is trying to do is make the country better for all Americans.  And no matter how are Bobby may try, he won’t keep the president from winning re-election.

Frankly I find Hollyweird to be made up of, for the most part, those who are less than intelligent and more than a little arrogant.  They are misfits whose only apparent redeeming quality is that they happen to look good on film or are unusually adept at memorization.  And while they may sound intelligent when speaking lines written for them, it’s when they become themselves and begin to speak that they very quickly reveal just how ignorant they truly are.  And it is without a doubt that Bobby is one of the most ignorant.

Actors who publicly speak out about politics only do damage to themselves.  Intelligent folks realize that these are folks get paid to pretend to be other people for a living, and just because they may play the part of an intelligent, moral person in some movie, that certainly doesn’t mean that that’s the kind of person they are.  I’m sure Bobby now fears that some of the skeletons in his own closet might now be in danger of being exposed.  I see this revelation about Weinstein as having started a chain reaction that may not end well for many.

And lastly it was long ago that I stopped worrying about what a bunch of amoral self-absorbed drug addled, alcoholic, perverts think about those issues that are most important to me and my family.  These people embrace degeneracy and herald pedophiles and rapists, while holding up murderous Communists and Marxists as idols.  They make fun of Christians and belittle those with high moral standards.  Maybe they should stick to what it is that they do best and stay the heck out of politics.  Not that that’s likely to happen any time soon.

Advertisements

ALEC BALDWIN, USEFUL IDIOT, OR JUST YOUR AVERAGE MORON???

Baldwin

I’ve always thought that when someone is involved in the selling of a product, regardless of how involved, they should go out of their way not to exhibit any sort of behavior that would make it harder for the maker of that product to convince as many customers as possible to purchase it.  And while of late there have been some football players who have taken a slightly different tack, many of those in Hollyweird have long been treating those counted on to buy their product as if they were somehow less than human.  And with the election of Donald Trump as president, they seem to have become even more unhinged.  And so now I find myself wondering why should I be willing to spend what it costs to see their movies, effectively paying the salary of those who think I’m a racist, or worse?

And really, just how many times is it that you can accuse everyone who chooses to disagree with your idiotic political points of view of being either a racist or a Nazi, or both, and our president of being another Hitler before such labels become meaningless.  Because when you accuse everyone of being a racist, no one is racist and when we’re all Nazis, can anyone be said to be a Nazi.  Which brings me, once again, to that perennial leftwing loon and longtime Hollyweird moron, Alec Baldwin.  Baldwin is the perfect example of all that Hollyweird has become.  Because long gone is the love of country by our movie stars who actually served in the military.  The majority of Hollyweirdos today would never even consider doing such a thing.  They’re not big fans of the military.

Apparently he recently sat for an interview for the October issue of British GQ.  Baldwin, as you know, often parodies the president on Saturday Night Live.  Although he said he was in no way comparing President Trump to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, he did seem to go well out of his way to imply as much when he said, “What you see with Trump is how Hitler got elected.”  Commenting on President Trump’s success, Baldwin said, “Now, I am by no means comparing Trump to Hitler, I would never do that…. What you see with Trump is how Hitler got elected. Someone who will say anything to people because of their economic interest.”  But in making such baseless and rather incendiary statements about President Trump, Baldwin too is disparaging those of us who chose to vote for him.

In his other remarks about the president, Baldwin said, “One of the real tragedies for him, on a Shakespearean level, is that his name is ruined.”  He went on to say, “His children are going to have to change their names when he gets out of the White House.”  And he added, “Everything that he wanted to achieve, the opposite has resulted.”  He said, “I think the powers that be, the money behind the Republican Party, they’ll have to get the smell out of the room so that [Mike] Pence can be the runner in 2020.”  And added, “And the sooner they get rid of him the better.”  Baldwin said, “How much more are they going to put up with?”  And in exhibiting what I assume was a little wishful thinking, he said, “I don’t think they’ll put up with much more…. I imagine he’ll resign.”

But you know, the interesting thing here is that if we were to replace every reference Baldwin makes to President Trump with a reference to Obummer, his description of how he sees things would be far more accurate.  Because how was it that Obummer was able to get elected and then re-elected?  Who was it, if not Obummer, who was willing to say whatever he thought necessary to get himself elected?  And who was it if not Obummer, who, with the help of the state-controlled media, was able to keep the fact that he was a very devout socialist well under wraps.  And who was it, if not Obummer, who promised to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America?  And yet this imbecile, Baldwin, chooses to compare, by not comparing, President Trump to Hitler?

The thing is that I very much doubt Baldwin, like so many others of those in his so-called ‘profession’, is intellectually competent enough to backup any of the accusations he makes with actual irrefutable facts.  But maybe I’m wrong.  His Hollyweird rants, straight out of grade school, have resulted in what exactly?  Who is it that he has managed to convince to come over to his side?  More often than not he and his ilk are doing little more than preaching to the choir.  And as the rhetoric continues to intensify, I can’t help but wonder how any rational human being can take any of these Hollyweird types, like Baldwin, seriously.  They accuse those who disagree with them as being filled with hate and do this by using some of the most hate filled language imaginable.

Baldwin describes President Trump as being, “Someone who will say anything to people because of their economic interest.”  But I’d like to ask Mr. Baldwin:

Which party leader said: “You didn’t build that?”

Which party leader was responsible for the lowest labor participation since the 1970s?

Which party leader was responsible for the worst economic recovery since the 1940s?

Which party leader was responsible for the lowest home ownership rate in 50 years?

Which party offers free medical care, college race quotas, hiring quotas, $15 an hour minimum wage in exchange for votes?

What party allowed the government to essentially assume control of General Motors only to sell it to labor unions at half the stock purchase price?

What party wants to forgive college loans, provide ‘free’ education for illegal aliens, supports sanctuary cities and open borders?

Seems to me only one party is constantly telling one group of people how much free stuff they deserve if they will only vote for Democrats.

Baldwin is nothing more than your common, everyday Democrat stooge.  A useful idiot of sorts, a hack and a mediocre actor at best who somehow thinks that folks outside his little circle of jerks actually care about what he thinks.  At the end of the day Hitler owned the media and if anything negative was ever said, those who said it were never around to say it again.  It’s incredible the contrast that these Hollyweird idiots try to make and yet never get it right.  When you stop and compare just some of what Obummer got away with, it’s he who comes across looking far more like Hitler than does President Trump.  You would think that the fascist parallels would be impossible to ignore.  And yet those on the left have absolutely no trouble whatsoever when it comes to doing just that.

Baldwin’s historical comparisons indicate that he doesn’t have a clue about history.  So just to refresh Baldwin and his fellow crackpots about what Hitler was, he was a progressive-vegetarian-atheist-socialist-drug addict, who thought that all profits and businesses should be strictly controlled by an all-seeing, all-powerful centralized government.  He did not believe in redistribution of wealth, but he did believe in the control of all wealth, and the acquisition of most wealth and routing into a central treasury, for use by the government to provide things for the public, collectively.  Because banks and corporations couldn’t be trusted to work for the people’s best interests, only the government can do that.  So Alec, which party in American politics does that sound like?

HEADS ARE ONCE AGAIN EXPLODING ALL OVER HOLLYWEIRD, AND I LOVE IT!!!

826

It would now appear that President Trump has once again been the cause for many of our Hollyweird elites to move further down the road toward becoming even more unhinged than they already are.  It seems the latest Trump action to succeed in pushing them all just that much closer to the brink is his decision to rescind Obummer’s blatantly unconstitutional, and obviously illegal, action called the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.  And I am happy to report that all over Hollyweird heads are now once again exploding at an ever increasing rate.

As is usually the case with this band of mental midgets, there has been an overwhelming number of accusations of racism and hatred made by some of Hollyweird’s louder (and more privileged) wackjobs in the past two or three days.  And most, as expected, have chosen to gloss over, or simply ignore, the context of the DACA policy, the decision to overturn it, and the potential consequences (which are unknown at this point.)  Instead, these elite actors, ‘journalists’, and entertainers chose to align the DACA decision with the Charlottesville violence.

White rapper Moby, whose rather fitting Twitter handle is “The Little Idiot,” tweeted that it was sad that those eligible for DACA were being used as “a political football” by the “racist #republican supporters.”  Apparently Mr. Moby was quite eager to prove that his handle is a perfect way for him to describe himself.  And then we had ‘actor’ John Leguizamo, also eager to prove the point of how little actual intelligence, if any, his profession requires, tweeted to President Trump, “You and the republicans are definitely becoming the enemy of Latinxs in America and Latin America.”

Then we have ‘Director’ Judd Apatow who, apparently not wanting to be left out of the conversation while feeling it necessary to demonstrate his own level of personal ignorance, accused the GOP of “not believing in democracy.” He also said, “What would Trump do to a Transgender, DACA child who wants to take down racist monuments and believes in global warming? The stockade?” I thought that statement was rather ironic, considering the fact that it’s the left who believes in violently suppressing and punishing those it disagrees with.  But I digress.

And then, of course, there was mediocre ‘talk show’ host and failed comedienne Chelsea Handler.  And in what could only have been yet another attempt on her part to add substance to the rumors that she is not known for being particularly bright, Ms. Handler declared in a rather juvenile tweet that, “Donald Trump hates brown people.”  She later posted, “Welcome to the land of Kim Jun Trump.” Ha ha! Comedy gold!  And if she lived in North Korea, the land of Kim Jong Un, Handler would never be heard of again after making such a crack about the Great Leader.

And it was that self-important activist and occasional actor Mark Ruffalo, whose only real claim to fame is his pretending to be a big, green comic book super hero in the movies, who called the decision “A cowardly act by a cruel, vindictive and heartless administration intent on tearing at the very fabric of the American dream.”  This guy is a bona fide genius, right?  I mean, come on.  Just how does this guy come up with such stuff?  And frankly, I’m not sure what it is that this guy sucks more at being, an activist or an ‘actor’.  He really doesn’t do either very well.

It was Lin Manuel Miranda of ‘Hamilton’ fame who said, “Okay. The Bad Man continues to do bad.” Presumably that was intended for his English-challenged readers.  And actress Piper Perabo asked her ‘fans’ to come and protest at the Trump Tower with her.  It’s not known how many fans she actually has or if any decided to join her.  And then it was he who has obviously never missed a meal, Michael Moore, who tweeted, “Devoid of empathy or compassion. . .end it. Now.”  This coming from a guy who routinely spews hate at white Americans on pretty much a daily basis.

Josh Gad, from the animated Frozen, fretted that the U.S. is  “barrelling down a very ugly path right now. How many people must be blocked, deported & banned before we say enough?” The answer, Josh?  When everyone here illegally, is gone.  They’re welcome to apply again legally.  Look, the list goes on and on, but why bother.  After a while they begin to sound like little more than a broken record.  That said, other famous, and some not-so-famous, virtue-signaling wealthy critics included Mia Farrow, Van Jones, Don Cheadle, Zoe Kazan, Yvette Nicole Brown and Queen Latifah.

Ya know, every time I hear stuff like this from this bunch of pathetic losers, my support for President Trump grows a little bit more, my dissatisfaction of Congress intensifies and my contempt for these lawless scumbags reaches yet another all new high.  Law and order. NOW!  And another promise kept.  The rule of law was pretty much ignored for the entire eight years we were forced to endure Obummer as “president.”  I want law and order.  I follow the law and I fully expect everyone else to follow the law as well.  After all, it’s not all that difficult, really.

Obummer skirted the legal authority of the Constitution and literally broke the law in 2012, and, courtesy of imperial edict, created this DACA scam which allows illegal immigrants to stay in the country (and hopefully, in the future, to vote Democrat).  Ten states sued the federal government because of this lawless edict that constitutional lawyers all say it was unlawful and will fail in court.  President Trump followed the law by overturning Obummer’s lawlessness, allowing the legislative process to solve the problem, as it should have in the first place, and the left goes bonkers!

President Trump is now being attacked by every mental case, liberal moron in the universe for observing the law and following The Constitution.  Conclusion: who cares about the law, the country, American workers, American culture, and the Constitution, as long as Third World brown people are allowed to stream into our country unchecked, get to stay here forever, as permanent lower-class wage slaves, as long as they vote Democrat.  That’s Democrats for ya, nothing but plantation owners and slave overseers.  It’s a shame minorities are too stupid, to see it.

And what all of these boobs seem to forget, or simply ignore, is the fact that during a speech announcing the new Department of Homeland Security Policy, Obummer explained that the protections for dreamers were just a “temporary relief.”  He said, “In the next few months, eligible individuals who do not present a risk to national security or public safety will be able to request temporary relief from deportation proceedings and apply for work authorization,” And he added, “Let’s be clear: this is not amnesty, this is not immunity, this is not a path to citizenship, this is not a permanent fix.”

Obummer concluded by saying, “This is a temporary stop-gap measure that helps us focus our resources wisely while giving a degree of relief and hope to talented, driven, and patriotic young people.”  And added, “It is the right thing to do.”  So now we fast-forward a few years and what we have is something that can only be described as a complete meltdown now occurring from Hollyweird to the halls of Congress, and over something that should never have been done in the first place.  Let’s face it, the Obummer presidency is something this country may never fully recover from.

YES, THERE IS A REASON THEY CALL HIM “MEATHEAD”…

reiner 2

We’ve all known for quite some time now that Rob “Meathead” Reiner has been playing with far less than a full deck.  But it would seem with the election of Donald Trump as president old Meathead’s mental state has taken a rather serious, and somewhat drastic, turn for the worse.  His mental status which has been rather questionable for decades may have finally deteriorated to the point where he has become much more than merely a danger to himself.  Because he is now calling for an “all out war” against President Donald Trump, his supporters as well as Fox News.

Meathead has frequently used Twitter as his outlet choice to promote unsubstantiated Democrat claims that President Trump has somehow committed crimes.  And he did so again this past Sunday for the purpose of accusing Trump of treasonous “colluding with the enemy” – and Fox News of covering it up.  Now keep in mind there has yet to be any proof of said collusion but that seemed to matter very little to old Meathead.  He Tweeted, “When Fox says that DT colluding with the enemy is not a crime, the fight to save Democracy is now an all out war. US-Stay strong. #Treason”

And it should come as no surprise that just a short time later old Meathead found himself on the receiving end of some rather serious blowback by other social media users, as he was slammed by several social media users suggesting that the actor’s tweet was just the latest violence-inducing screed on a very long list of many that have aimed at President Trump from those on the outer fringes of leftwing kookdom.  Meathead has long resisted President Trump.  Last May, he called then-candidate Trump “insane” and said a lot of his supporters are “racist.”

And it was just weeks after President Trump was sworn in as president that Meathead called President Trump’s White House “a cancerous presidency that we cannot allow to spread.”  And it was during an appearance on MS’LSD’ back in February that he said, “What’s interesting here is that we really have a test, and we are being tested as to whether or not our democracy is going to survive.”  And he went on to say, “We have somebody who’s mentally unstable, who is a pathological liar. There’s no getting around that, who’s running our country.”

And then on June 15th, the day after a rabid Bernie supporter attacked Republicans at a Virginia baseball field leaving Rep. Steve Scalise in critical condition, Meathead pounced on the opportunity to turn attention away from the shooting to Democrats’ investigation of Trump’s unproven ties to Russia.  It was then that he Tweeted, “The tragedy in Virginia has brought us together. Now we must come together over Russia’s attack on our democracy. POTUS, stop obstructing!”  In addition to accusing Trump of treason and obstruction, he again attacked Trump’s supporters by labeling them as racists.

Meathead needs to try a little harder to keep his over-inflated Hollyweird ego in check!  And does he really think that anyone pays any attention to his never-ending stream of mind-numbing leftist drivel?  Look, if there is one profession that contributes absolutely nothing to society, it’s that of being an entertainer of nearly any sort.  And the fact that the majority of these people are uneducated, with most having never even graduating from high school, you have to wonder what makes them feel able to tell the rest of us how it is that we must live out our lives.

Personally I’m done spending so much as a dime of my hard earned money to see a movie, in fact I can’t remember the last time I found myself inside of a movie theater.  I find that the rate of return on my investment in the form of how much I am now asked to cough up for the price of a ticket, plus munchies, makes the entire experience less than cost effective.  I made the decision a long time ago to boycott movies entirely when Hollyweird liberals started sticking their noses into my business uninvited and making all manner of idiotic political statements.

So how about we declare war on “Meathead”?  You know, spread a little unsubstantiated rumor here, a little innuendo there.  And while I don’t know if he’s a pervert, a drug addict or if he’s someone with a fondness for using the ladies’ room, what’s the harm in spreading a few rumors.  I heard it from a source that I deem reliable so that’s good enough for me.  I’ve also heard he beats women and enjoys exposing himself.  And since we haven’t seen his tax returns that might be because he’s hiding proceeds from smuggling drugs.  All’s fair in war, right “Meathead”?

Meathead and his fellow Hollyweird elitists should be banned from the public square forever.  And what exactly qualifies any of them to utter any opinion on those topics that they know absolutely nothing about?  Alas, free speech brings in this sort of nonsense.  And while we must tolerate it, we can respond to their elitist and subversive lectures by staying away from their work and avoiding their sponsors in the free marketplace.  These idiots alienate at least half of their potential “customers” when they go off script and are too stupid to understand that.

ROBERT REDFORD, A WORN OUT OLD HAS-BEEN LOOKING FOR A WAY BACK…

Redford

Rarely have I ever found that actors have any of the answers to those questions that are truly important.  After all, nothing screams intelligence more than having the ability to read those words that someone else has written while pretending to be someone other than who you really are.  And, pretending to be something you’re not, I guess, makes you an expert on that particular subject.  These ‘actors’ have a writer create the lines for them, they have a director to tell them how to act those words out and they have costume designers who pick out the clothes they wear while acting out those words written by someone else.  What exactly is it that actors do based on their own skills?  That would, of course, be absolutely NOTHING!

Which brings me to the point of this post.  You see, it was in a recent guest column for the Washington Post that ‘actor’ Robert Redford described the difficulty he had in getting Hollywood producers interested in his 1976 film ‘All the President’s Men’.  A movie, frankly I have never seen and never will, and one which revolves around the investigation into former President Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal.  And it was in Redford’s guest column that he warns us all that, once again, 45 years after that politically momentous event, “the truth is again in danger.”  While I would in fact agree with his overall assessment, where Redford and I part ways is in identifying who is it that’s the primary offender when it comes to having placed the truth in such peril.

It in writing his little piece for the Washington Post that Redford says, “This year marks the 45th anniversary of the Watergate scandal. Because of my role in the film, some have asked me about the similarities between our situations in 1972 and 2017.”  He goes on to say, “There are many. The biggest one is the importance of a free and independent media in defending our democracy.”    Bobby went on say, “When President Trump speaks of being in a “running war” with the media, calls them “among the most dishonest human beings on Earth” and tweets that they’re the “enemy of the American people,” his language takes the Nixon administration’s false accusations of “shoddy” and “shabby” journalism to new and dangerous heights.”

And it was something that he said that I found quite hilarious, although I’m not sure he intended it to be, but I’m assuming he didn’t.  It was when he said, “Sound and accurate journalism defends our democracy. It’s one of the most effective weapons we have to restrain the power-hungry. I always said that “All the President’s Men” was a violent movie. No shots were fired, but words were used as weapons.”  As much as I hate to disagree with Redford’s rather skewed perception of things, the truth is that today’s ‘journalism’ is neither sound nor accurate!  More often than not what’s we’re witnessing is journalistic malpractice on what is nothing less than an epic scale, to the point where it more closely resembles propaganda than accurate information!

Like Hillary wasn’t, and continues to be, a threat to the truth.  But then according to liberals the truth is whatever they say it is.  Which begs the question, where was Redford when Hitlery and Barry were lying through their pearly whites, and the state-controlled media, which Redford claims is both sound and accurate, was backing them up?  Barry blatantly lied about Obamacare, and Hitlery lied many times over regarding her emails and email server.  Barry lied about learning of Hitlery’s server in the news, while he had sent her emails suspiciously using an alias, emails that we’ve not yet seen.  The Russians might release all or some of those emails, because they likely got them by hacking her unsecured server, blackmailing her and Barry as a result.

Redford’s desire for “truth” seems simply partisan, that or he shows his foolish belief in the liberal media without question.  Why do you think he’s an ‘actor’?  He, like all the rest of the Hollyweird buffoons, has no clue who or what they are. That is why they are always trying to be someone else.  They are trying to find themselves in being someone else.  Fake people, living in a fake reality trying to convince other folks they are relevant and should be listened to.  What they really need to do is first figure out who they are and quit trying to tell the rest of us how much better they are than us.  Yes, Robert, the truth is in danger.  When the state-controlled media can declare war on one candidate and then the president, all the while justifying it.

But the sad fact is the truth is always in danger whenever our state-controlled media refuses to acknowledge, let alone refuses to report, that intelligence briefings and evidence is now surfacing that leaves very little room for doubt that the outgoing administration very likely not only spied on and ordered up surveillance on the in-coming administration, but then leaked classified info while unmasking American citizens, and then disseminated the findings all across the intelligence community.  And all for political gain.  But those like Redford see absolutely nothing wrong with that because such actions are seen as being somehow justified because of whom the actions were taken against.  And in so doing they miss the point entirely!

And ya know, I can’t help but wonder how many of those out there in ‘Kookville’, aka Hollyweird, actually believe what it is that they say especially when there is now an overwhelming amount of evidence that makes it so very clear that what has happened is so very obviously just the opposite of their incendiary claims.  Trump is actually the victim here, of Barry’s surveillance, yet their fanaticism has truly blinded them.  It was Barry, whose IRS went after common citizens in the Tea Party, and who created the video fall guy in Benghazi-Gate, and who went after members of the press.  And every time they wish to drive home a point, they are either animated, melodramatic, hysterical or just playing dumb or maybe not really ‘playing’ dumb at all.

Redford is an jerk.  And if you’ll remember, Nixon resigned over his attempt to cover up the break in.  The break in of the DNC.  It was one party spying on the other party. Politics in its most pure and nastiest form. What is going on now is the U.S. government spying on private citizens.  Do you see the difference?  The left only want to subjugate the rest of us.  Not working out so well in Europe is it?  Redford, like most Hollyweird actors, is a sanctimonious know-nothing blowhard. What’s going on right now is the exact inverse of Watergate. You have a president, Barry, who illegally surveilled his political opposition and instead of helping bring this powder keg story to light the state-controlled media is doing everything it can to obfuscate and bury it.

Actors, like the vast majority of lawyers, are little more than professional liars.  Add then when you add into the mix politicians and our many faux journalists and it’s no wonder that truth is on its last leg.  Lying can now be said to have become a reflex action for those on the left, like Redford, whenever it is that things don’t seem to be going their way, politically speaking.  And why is it, do you suppose, that anyone in their right mind would ever think that just because someone like Redford the actor played a certain part or role in a movie that would then make him an expert in the field in which was the character he played?  I mean, if he were to play a brain surgeon, would anyone be seeking him out to perform surgery on them?  I doubt it!

And finally, remember when we were told, “If you like your doctor…you can keep your doctor.”  Or when we were told that the attack in Benghazi was the result of a You Tube video.  Or that raising the debt ceiling doesn’t raise the debt.  Was the political genius Robert Redford concerned with any of those whoppers?  Was he at all concerned with Barry’s Trillion dollar deficits?  Or with Barry’s bombing of Libya?  Or with Barry’s spying on reporters, foreign leaders and presidential candidates?  Probably not. Why do actors think they’re experts about something just because they starred in a movie about the subject?  I mean, just because Matt Damon starred in a space movie that doesn’t qualify him to advise NASA on anything. If you get my drift.

GEORGE ‘LOONEY’ CLOONEY…OBSESSED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP…

clooney-2

Taking time out from doing that which he does best, making movies that suck and typically bomb at the box office, Hollywood elitist George Clooney recently left no doubt about just how offended he is that Donald Trump is now our president.  And he, apparently, now considers Trump as part of the same Hollywood elite that Trump condemns.  So in what was an attempt to throw some dirt on Trump, old ‘Looney’ Clooney has conjured an unoriginal idea and is now calling Trump, a Hollywood elitist.

‘Looney’s’ comment came during an interview in France where he was to receive an honorary award, since that’s the ONLY kind of an award he is able to ‘receive’ because his movies suck, at what amounts to the French Oscars.  Most folks know that Clooney was very pro-Hitlery and will likely remember, too, how it was that he claimed, “there will never be a President Trump.”  He said it’s very hypocritical for Trump to speak about the ‘Hollywood elite’ in the manner in which he does.

‘Looney’ Clooney said, “There’s a really interesting argument, this is the part that makes you a little crazy. When Meryl [Streep] spoke [at the Golden Globes], everyone on that one side was, ‘Well that’s elitist Hollywood speaking.’ Donald Trump has 22 acting credits in television… He collects $120,000 a year in his Screen Actors Guild pension fund. Uhh? He is a Hollywood elitist.  I would argue that the ‘Hollywood elite.”  But it’s not the number of ones credits that makes one an elitist.

But still ‘Looney’ went on, claiming that at least Trump was relatively successful in the industry, unlike his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, who ‘Looney’ Clooney called a ‘failed film writer and director’.  Which I thought was a big ironic, because I can’t help but wonder how much of a ‘success’ Clooney would have become if it weren’t for the fact that he owns the production company that continues to make his pathetically bad movies. It’s my guess he would have long ago been considered as box office poison.

From “One Fine Day” (1996) to “Batman & Robin” (1997) to “Solaris” (2002) to “Intolerable Cruelty” (2003) to “The Good German” (2006) to “Leatherheads” (2008) to “The Men Who Stare at Goats” (2009) to “The Ides of March” (2011) to “The Monuments Men” (2014), if Clooney was the main attraction, the movie was somewhere between a disappointment and a bomb.  Of his 25 starring movies, four made a significant amount of money — that’s a .160 batting average.

And yet Clooney said, “Steve Bannon is a failed film writer and director.”  And he went on to say, “That’s the truth, that’s what he’s done. He wrote a Shakespearean rap musical about the L.A. riots that he couldn’t get made. He made a lot of money off of Seinfeld. He’s elitist Hollywood, I mean that’s the reality.”  Look, it’s Clooney’s job, as it is everyone else’s in Hollyweird, not to deal in reality, and it’s he’s and his many friends who are doing a pretty good job of that off-screen, as well as on.

But, look, this is just the latest example of Clooney speaking out against Trump.  You see, it was back on February 22 in an interview with The Daily Beast that ‘Looney’ Clooney made the same claim that Trump is a ‘Hollywood elitist’ due to his numerous TV and film credits.  It was then that he said, ‘Donald Trump has 22 acting credits in television… He collects $120,000 a year in his Screen Actors Guild pension fund. Uhh? He is a Hollywood elitist.’   Most folks, I think, likely use a different criteria.

Anyway, it was Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo and France’s foreign minister who also pushed back at Trump for insulting the ‘City of Light’ on Friday in a speech.  You see, it was in an address at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) that Trump evoked his friend Jim, who we were told is ‘a very, very substantial guy.’  Trump said that Jim used to be a regular visitor to Paris, but that he hasn’t made the trip in four or five years because ‘Paris is no longer Paris’.

President Trump, in what was an apparent reference to last year’s Bastille Day attack in Nice and the 2015 Paris attacks, said, “Take a look at what’s happened in France. Take a look at Nice and Paris.”  He said Jim used to visit Paris each summer, “It was automatic… He wouldn’t miss it for anything.”  Trump said, “Now he doesn’t even think in terms of going there. Take a look at what’s happening to our world folks and we have to be smart. We have to be smart. We can’t let it happen to us.”

I sometimes wonder if Clooney ever feels the least bit foolish after his rather silly little prediction about how Trump would NEVER become President.  Especially now when now called on to say something because Trump IS President.  Somehow I doubt it, because it remains quite clear that ‘Looney’ Clooney is, just as he was then, simply not mentally prepared to address this situation.  Like so many of those in Hollyweird he is simply so out of touch with those who still comprise a majority of Americans.

Americans view Hollyweird as being one of the most rapacious, unpleasant, backstabbing, money obsessed industries there is on the entire planet. Their product is rarely of any worth, and is clearly focused on wringing as much money as possible out of the masses.  How can people who’ve done spectacularly well out of such a soulless uber-neoliberal ultra-capitalist industry possibly think they have the right to lecture us about what our money should be spent on.  And yet, they do.