Climate Change 33

What are the true believers in the next great apocalypse to befall humankind to do when it’s fewer and fewer people who continue to buy into their ‘Chicken Little’ nonsense and refuse to fall in line behind the notion that in order to somehow save the planet our country, and apparently ONLY our country, MUST first be made to experience what any reasonable person should see as being economic ruin.  It has been over the course of my life that we have gone from ‘climate change’ involving a coming ice age, and after that never materialized we were again warned of ‘climate change’ only this time not involving global cooling, but ‘global warming.’

And it has been ‘global warming’ that, for decades, those on the left have been desperate to convince us, most recently by telling us that we only have 10-12 years left, that we must make the ‘necessary’ sacrifices if we are to have any hope of saving the planet for (wait for it)…‘the children.’  But still too few people are paying this nonsense the level of attention the true believers feel it deserves.  They’ve tried calling this global catastrophe ‘global warming,’ then referred by the more generic, but no less threatening, term of ‘climate change,’ and still the true believers have failed to generate the necessary hysteria needed to turn people into believers.

The cult of ‘climate change,’ and make no mistake that’s really what we’re dealing with here, seems to be experiencing yet another identity crisis, of sorts.  Some in the movement believe that the term ‘climate change’ simply is not frightening enough and that it simply doesn’t conjure up the necessary imagery regarding what the true believers appear to feel is now heading in our direction.  Therefore, they feel, the movement is in need of a rebranding, of sorts, in order to properly rouse the world’s population into action against what a great many non-believers continue to view as being nothing more than a fake calamity, and with very good reason.

It was early in the 21st century that ‘global warming’ was seen as being the term of choice for those doing their best to scare the public into believing that what we were then faced with was a coming disaster that, if we were to have any hope of surviving it, would necessitate a world government. But when the world ceased warming, a new catch-all phrase was needed, so ‘climate change,’ was created to keep the world’s populace fearful than man-made carbon dioxide was destroying our ability to survive. And it’s now that the true-believers are worrying that neither term, ‘global warming’ nor ‘climate change,’ is sufficiently horrific to keep the public properly terrified.

So, in my own little way, I thought I would offer up a few suggestions regarding a few names for this coming non-calamity-calamity we are said to be facing.  And in so doing I found myself wondering if perhaps terms like ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming,’ though scientific in nature were just a bit too neutral sounding.  Do they do enough to grab attention and stir people into action?  I mean, for one thing, what does the term ‘climate change’ really mean?  Most folks view climate on a local basis and expect it to change.  As for ‘global warming,’ if the Earth isn’t warming, as it wasn’t during the first part of this century, the use of the term is a misnomer.

So, what are those suffering from ‘climate hysteria’ supposed to do?  In my search to come up with more appropriate sounding nomenclature I managed to come across what I thought might be, at least potentially, some viable alternatives.  Terms like ‘global meltdown’ or ‘global melting’ might be a couple of possibilities.  Or perhaps terms like “climate collapse” and “climate chaos” would be seen as being sufficiently terrifying.  Now keep in mind here these suggestions were arrived at only after the briefest amount of time spent searching.  And that’s not to say that there could very likely be far more applicable metaphors out there still waiting to be discovered.

Let’s be honest, rebranding is what ad agencies do to sell inferior products that aren’t selling.  And as we all know, any product wearing the moniker of “new and improved” is one to be avoided.  If for no other reason than because such a product is rarely new or, rarer still, improved.  Let those who claim to believe in global warming/climate change lead by example. Not only should they cease flying in their private jets, they should cease traveling altogether.  Moreover, they should turn off their electricity and other utilities and only eat what they find in their yard. By doing so, they would greatly reduce their carbon footprint, and if they want to reduce it to zero, they should stop breathing.


Climate Change 32

It has been for decades that the ‘Chicken Littles’ of the world have been sounding the ‘climate change’ alarm.  First it was about a coming ice age and more recently it’s about how we need to be more concerned, worried even, about what they once described as ‘global warming’ but now describe it in far more generic terms as mere ‘climate change’ or even ‘climate disruption.’  But how it’s described by those on the left it is really unimportant for the very simply reason that it’s all nothing more than one grand work of political fiction and nothing more.  Absolutely nothing.

I can say that because it has been over the course of those many decades that those in the ‘scientific’ climate community as well as the many in the so-called environmental ‘movement’ have not gotten even one prediction correct, and they now have a perfect record of getting 41 predictions spectacularly wrong.  In other words, on at least 41 occasions, these so-called ‘experts’ have predicted some terrible environmental catastrophe was imminent, and it just never quite materialized.  Not once have these alarmists had one of their predictions come true.

Think about that, these so-called experts are now 0 for 41 in their predictions, yet those of us who are skeptical of prediction number 42, the one that says unless we immediately convert to socialism and allow Alexandria Occasional-Crazy to control and organize our lives the planet will become uninhabitable, we are commonly referred to as ‘flat-earthers.’ Why would any sane person ever listen to someone with a 0-41 record?  Why would we completely restructure our economy and sacrifice our personal freedom for “experts” who are 0-41, who have never once gotten it right?

Here is the source for numbers 1-27. As you will see, we are not talking crackpots, but scientific studies and media reports on “expert” predictions. The sources for numbers 28-41 are not listed but can be easily located online.

  1. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
  2. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
  3. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
  4. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
  5. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
  6. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
  7. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
  8. 1974: Another Ice Age?
  9. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
  10. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
  11. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
  12. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
  13. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
  14. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
  15. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
  16. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
  17. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
  18. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
  19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
  20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
  21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
  22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
  23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
  24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
  25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
  26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
  27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’

And then we have the following cockamamie predictions:

  1. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
  2. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
  3. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
  4. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
  5. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
  6. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
  7. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
  8. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
  9. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
  10. 2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
  11. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
  12. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
  13. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
  14. 1970s: Killer Bees!

So what we have here is a pretty piss-poor record for something we’ve been told is now, and has been for a very long time, “settled science” about an apocalypse that we’re told will arrive in little over a decade.  Only a fool comes running after the 42nd crying of wolf.  Everywhere I can think of weather is behaving exactly as weather always has, unpredictably.  Think about it, how often is it that your local weather guy, or gal, ever gets it right.  Being a TV weather-guesser is the only job I know of where you can be wrong 90% of the time and still keep your job.

The world in which we live is constantly changing, and climate is not one that is in anyway, static.  So why is it that those on the left are always so much in a hurry to declare that mankind is responsible for any and all changes that may occur?  It’s because mankind has absolutely nothing to do with these changes other than how those on the left are then able to exploit those changes to further what is an agenda that is very much hazardous to America by allowing those on the left to acquire even more political power and therefore more control over the ‘governed.’

Now of course those on the left will say, or do, anything they have to in their continuing quest for power.  And of course they will aggressively deny that their supposed concerns have absolutely anything to do with anything other than their concern for future generations.  And if you believe that I have some prime oceanfront property in Arizona I can let you have very cheap.  The person who thinks humans can alter the climate/weather in any measurable amount is either a nut, a moron, a scam artist or someone who has simply refused to do their homework.

The Globalists want to control the world. To accomplish this they require money and lots of it (Carbon Tax). They also require a perceived threat that is global in nature (climate control). They also require a mechanism to propagate their 24/7/365 propaganda (MSM). And they require the institutions to dumb down and indoctrinate our youth (DOE, Universities, Public Schools, Revised History, Revised science). They need to destroy the nucleus of western culture (the family).  Next they need to turn people against one another (Democrats/identity politics).

And, AND, they need to create as much social chaos as possible (illegal immigration and no borders). They need to prevent the citizens from revolting (gun confiscation). Lastly, they need to overthrow the government, the Constitution and the will of the people (Attempted coup of President Trump).  Folks, it’s all playing out right in front of our eyes. All people need to do is to open their eyes and have the courage to accept the reality.  And that is what all of these climate zealots are desperate to keep from happening.  They don’t want anyone pulling back the curtain.


Margolin 1

If ever there was any doubt that we are now busily raising a generation of what are little more than brainwashed little zombies that should have been officially put to rest after what was a classic exercise in ‘climate buffoonery’ which took place in the U.S. House just yesterday.  In what I can only assume was an attempt by Democrat believers to convince the rest of us that they are not talking out of their asses when it comes to their cockamamie religion of ‘man-made climate change’, they thought it appropriate to invite a couple of kids who I fear may just personify those who are the generation to whom we will be passing the baton for the safeguarding of America.

Ms.Jamie Margolin is someone described as being a teen climate activist and it was she who ‘testified,’ on Wednesday, before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, alongside fellow ‘activist’ Greta Thunberg, that the climate “crisis” is directly linked to colonialism and slavery.  Now the fact that Ms. Margolin is a native of Seattle, Washington may likely explaining her naïve willingness for buying into something as ludicrous as ‘climate change.’  And I guess I would be curious to know on just what it is that she bases her rather silly conclusions.  Perhaps they come from her very liberal wackjob parents?

Ms. Margolin was joined by Ms. Thunberg, that famed European climate activist who recently received stunning accolades from ex-president O-bummer, and proceeded to tell U.S. lawmakers that her generation lives with constant “fear and despair” due to the climate crisis and added that ‘climate change’ is directly linked to colonialism, slavery, and natural resource extraction.  She said, “I want the entirety of Congress — in fact, the whole U.S. government — to remember the fear and despair that my generation lives with every day, and I want you to hold on to it.”  Gag me with a spoon!  I’m sorry, but why are we even listening to this child?  Shades of David Hogg!

She asked, “How do I even begin to convey to you what it feels like to know that within my lifetime the destruction that we have already seen from the climate crisis will only get worse?”  What “destruction” is it that she is referring too?  And she went on to suggest that her dreams really do not matter because her generation “has been committed to a planet that is collapsing.”  Collapsing?  Really?  Wow, talk about some pretty heavy doom and gloom.  And then she actually went so far as to scold lawmakers, telling them they should be ashamed of themselves because “youth climate activists should not have to exist” in the first place.  This was such a farce.

While she took on a more optimistic tone when talking about potential solutions, she then veered sharply to the left by painting a darker and more sinister picture of America.  Ms. Margolin said, “Solving the climate crisis goes against everything that our country was unfortunately built on — colonialism, slavery, and natural resource extraction.”  And she added, “This is why the youth are calling for a new era altogether.”  She said, “As Greta mentioned, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that we only have a few months left to create the massive political shift needed to transition our world to an entirely renewable energy economy.”

And it was in citing the commonly touted ten-year deadline that she said, “This needs to happen within the next ten years, which is our deadline to save life as we know it,” adding that she would like her generation to be known as “Generation GND” for the “Green New Deal” rather than Generation Z.  Margolin revisited her argument on colonialism later on and urged the U.S. to listen to “indigenous protectors” in Latin America. However, she warned America to “not perpetuate the same systems of oppression that have been pushing them down.”  You simply cannot make this shit up!  Why is she even worth listening to?  Because she’s NOT!

And then she went on to accuse America of “trying to colonize” its way out of the climate crisis.  She said, “And right now something that has been disturbing me a lot is seeing the way that we are trying to colonize and buy and sell our way out of a problem caused by colonization and buying and selling.”  I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised by the level of drivel spewed by this teenage ‘zealot’ as she represents the caliber of citizen now being churned out by our government run public education system.  And it’s with each new graduating class that America, as a whole, becomes just a bit dumber, placing the survival of our country all the more in doubt.

The lying communist propagandists have been heralding the end of the world for close to a century. I wish little Greta and her ilk would go live on a deserted island with zero resource extraction and zero combustible engines and see how much fun it is digging for roots to eat and living in a mud hut.  Unfortunately the Democrats have succeeded in turning our public education system into a liberal indoctrination system which is producing millions of American children with no judgement or critical thinking skills and no knowledge of basic science. They are easily programmed to believe almost anything their teachers or the mass media put into their heads.

Democrats are using children as human shields against criticism of their outlandish climate hope and change agenda. It’s the same strategy they used when O-Bummer was president saying, “You can’t criticize Obama’s policies, because that would be racist,” or “You can’t criticize what children say about man-made climate change, because that would prove that you hate children.”  It was during WWII that Germany indoctrinated its children and made them into perfect Hitler Youth. The left has infiltrated our schools and is doing the same thing on multiple agendas.  Sad to say, but propaganda works and now the left has its little programmed foot soldiers.

This teenager tells Congress how horrible it is to be young with so much looming uncertainty ahead.  Guess what, Chickie, when I was your age they were saying chlorofluorocarbons were going to block out the sun and we were going to have another ice age and either freeze or starve to death. If you’re that concerned, maybe instead of whining to Congress you should go to places who are the worst offenders and complain to them.  Get THEM to do something about it. What a generation of wussies. Every generation in history has grown up with uncertainties, whether it was the atom bomb or wondering if you were going to catch the plague.

But at least she can memorize the talking points her handlers provided to her. She wouldn’t know about or understand colonialism or slavery, other than the version of history her ‘teachers’ have been feeding her since kindergarten. She doesn’t have the age, the background, or the experience to have seen it in action in any of the Arab or African countries where it’s still practiced, or the various versions practiced in India and other South East Asian countries where being of a lower caste is the same as being a slave because you aren’t allowed to move up. She’s a fake and a fraud, and the Democrats will bow to her all the way to our destruction if we let them.



And so, the Democrat Party continues in their effort to convince the American people that something which has yet to be proven to exist, actually does exist, and is the greatest threat they currently face.  The Democrats’ continued warnings about ‘global warning’, ‘climate change’, or ‘climate disruption’ or whatever else they want to call it, flies in the face of ‘real’ science.  And we all know how Democrats are such big proponents of…’science.’  Unless, of course, it doesn’t actually support their cockamamie ‘theory’ which they have been pushing, quite literally, for decades!

Just this past Wednesday it was Chuckie Schumer who took to the floor of the Senate and once again sounded like little more than a broken record as he went off on what was yet another politically motivated rant claiming that, “no threat poses a greater danger to our planet than climate change.”  Chuckie said, “On the climate, as I have said so many times, no threat poses a greater danger to our planet than that of climate change.”  And just like so many times before all Chuckie was really doing was to attempt to perpetuate that which he knows is nothing more than a lie.

And so it was from there on the floor of the Senate that Chuckie said, “The last 5 years have been the warmest on record.”  And he went on to say, “There is more carbon dioxide in the air than any point in human history.”  Chuckie made reference to a conversation that President Trump had with Prince Charles of Great Britain earlier this week about climate change.  He said, “Just yesterday, President Trump once again–not based on fact, based on whim, as he so often acts–voiced a dangerous skepticism about climate change while meeting with Prince Charles.”

Chuckie even went so far as to suggest President Trump is “a member of the Flat Earth Society” when it comes to climate change.  And it was in so doing that Chuckie said, “The President is sort of, on climate, a member of the Flat Earth Society, just denying the facts.”  And he would go on to say, “It would be as if Columbus sailed, and the President still said the earth is flat. That is how he is acting on climate.”  Yup, all of us rubes who remain unwilling to believe what Democrats, like Chuckie, are telling us, would have been those who once claimed that the Earth was flat.

So here we have a guy, actually an entire political party, who seems to have no problem with the ‘fact’ that over 70 million babies have been butchered in the last 46 years trying to bully us into believing that which is nothing more than another Democrat suicide mission, this one being financial because of the ‘TRILLIONS’ of dollars they say it will cost to combat this supposed looming apocalypse.  And Chuckie seems to be totally oblivious to the ‘fact’ that the Democrats have been wrong on everything.  The polar caps are NOT melting, polar bears are thriving and on and on.

And it was there from there on the Senate floor that Chuckie said, “Our children and grandchildren will live with the consequences of the decisions we make today. We need all hands on deck–the Federal Government, local governments, municipalities, corporate leaders, global efforts–if we are to meet the challenges of climate change head-on, but for years our government has been too slow to act and more often than not we have done nothing or very little.” He accused the president of having voiced a “dangerous skepticism” based not on ‘fact’ but on whim.

And of course it was during his rant that Chuckie was likely compelled to bring the danger we face from those evil fossil fuel producers.  Chuckie said, “Now, one of the biggest reasons for the slow progress on climate policy has been the oppressive grip of Big Oil, Big Gas, and Big Coal, on our political system. They spent untold millions to debunk climate science and torpedo climate legislation. One of the largest perpetrators has been the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which never reveals its donors and has acted all too often as a front for Big Oil.”  There’s nothing to debunk!

And he then went on to say, “It is not enough to simply say: Oh, well, it is a problem. Inaction is not an option. They must do something concrete. This is a concrete action we are proposing that will make a difference. I read in today’s New York Times that companies are now beginning to plan for how climate change will cost them more money in the next 5 years. They don’t think it is no problem. They don’t think it is a 30-year problem.”  I think it’s all rather presumptive to think than man is able to impact the planet one way or the other, despite Democrats believing that we can.

And it was in finally getting ready to step down from his little soapbox that Chuckie said, “This is a moment when the Chamber could actually use its influence to convince the administration to reverse course. If the business community said this, it would make a big difference. So this is a moment. Let’s see if the chamber really wants to prove that they are for ‘climate change.’ Let’s see. Let’s see. If they don’t, we ask their members who say they believe in climate–and who are even planning for the problems we face–to put pressure on them to do it. Let’s hope.”

As a counter to Chuckie’s rant about bogus ‘climate change,’ I would argue that there IS something that poses a threat to this country, and one that could have far more serious consequences, and much sooner than the 12 years that the Democrats claim we have before the climate starts killing us.  And that would, of course, be the disease and pestilence that was once thought to have been eradicated but now seems to experiencing a comeback, of sorts, all thanks to those flooding across our border and whom Democrat’s, like Chuckie, continue to eagerly welcome into this country.

And you really have to ask yourself, are the Democrats really as concerned about the climate as they claim to be?  Let’s face it when was the last time anyone can remember that Democrats supported anything that did not directly benefit them?  Not America, not the world, not the planet, not the universe, only them!  That alone should be sufficient to call into question just how far their supposed belief in ‘climate change’ really goes.  Democrats have absolutely no interest in anything that cannot be used in some way to advance an agenda that does not end well for America.



It was just recently that we heard from Democrats about how the combating of supposed ‘climate change’ is the equivalent of fighting the Nazis in World War II or putting a man on the Moon.  Both of which I thought were peculiar analogies for combating something that the vast majority of Americans doubt even exists.  While those on the left continue to tout is as being ‘settled science’, that’s far from being the case.  The most recent ‘master plan’ for combating this manufactured crisis comes to us in the form of something called, ‘The Green New Deal.’  And Democrats apparently see ‘climate change’ as their best way to defeat President Trump.

And it was Democrat Chris Murphy who recently said that despite claims to the contrary, this green new deal resolution, which calls for meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the U.S. through clean, renewable and zero emission energy sources, is “absolutely realistic.”  He was recently interviewed there at ‘fake news’ headquarters, aka CNN, and it was faux journalist Jake Tapper who mentioned that Angus King, who is an ‘Independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats, and Barry ‘O’s former Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz, have said that they don’t think Murphy’s plan is very realistic.  But realistic or not, it’s seems to be gaining support.

And it was in taking offense at such remarks, Murphy said, “I think it’s absolutely realistic, and I frankly think we need to set our sights high. I think there are a lot of people who said that it wasn’t realistic for the United States to get a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s when President Kennedy initially outlined that goal, but we did it, and I think we have to set our sights high.”  He said, “I have a 10-year-old and 7-year-old. Global warming is an existential threat to the planet, and so if we don’t command this country to think big about saving our nation and our world from destruction, then I don’t think we’re going to get close to meeting the mark.”

It was last Friday that Murphy, along with fellow Democrats ‘Lying Dick’ Blumenthal, Edward ‘Malarkey’ Markey and one of the newest members of Congress, the rather simplistic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced a bicameral resolution calling for a Green New Deal.  Murphy said in a statement on his website: “Climate change is the most pressing problem facing our generation.”  And he goes on to say, “It is already posing a security threat to our nation, and we are feeling its impacts in real time. We need bold ideas if we’re going to rise to meet this challenge.”  However, it’s obvious that one man’s “bold ideas” is another man’s silly idealistic crusade.

The Green New Deal Resolution lays out the goals and projects for a ten-year national mobilization to:

  • Build resiliency against climate change-related disasters;
  • Repair and upgrade U.S. infrastructure;
  • Meet 100 percent of our power demand through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources;
  • Build or upgrade to energy-efficient, distributed and “smart” power grids;
  • Upgrade all existing U.S. buildings and build new buildings, to achieve maximum energy efficiency;
  • Spur massive growth in clean U.S. manufacturing and remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry;
  • Work with farmers and ranchers to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector;
  • Overhaul U.S. transportation systems;
  • Remove greenhouse gases and reduce pollution, including by restoring our natural ecosystems through proven low-tech solutions;
  • Restore and protect threatened, endangered, and fragile ecosystems;
  • Clean up existing hazardous waste and abandoned sites;
  • Make the United States the international leader on climate action and help other countries achieve a Green New Deal.

But things get even more bizarre the further that we dig into this boondoggle, because this ‘Green New Deal’ also “includes the goals of guaranteeing that all members of society can have a job with a family-sustaining wage and are provided with high-quality health care; affordable, safe, and adequate housing; economic security; and access to a clean environment.”  Of all the supposed gimmicks ever devised to combat this nonexistent threat, this ‘green new deal’ has to be the nuttiest proposal ever to be conceived.  Instead of taking this political nonsense seriously, anyone who admits to supporting it should be locked up in a padded room.

It was arguably one of the most embarrassing, yet revealing, political disclosures on the steps of the Capitol in quite some time.  Ms. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, declared by some to be a “rock star”, read from a prepared script that was badly in need of a major edit. The laundry list of goals outlined in the ‘Green New Deal’ (which she actually didn’t write) was so childish, so lacking in commonsense, it made clear to the world these new Democrats in Congress suffer from a rather shocking lack of both intelligence and perspective.   Was it really that bad?  Yes it was, and I wouldn’t be surprised to find out much of it was bought and paid for by our ‘friends’ in China.

In a nut shell, this ‘Green New Deal’ will result in nothing more than the federal government taking control of all properties; whether farms, ranches, homes, office buildings; the use of all forms of transportation; air, train, auto, walking, bus; over every industry, what industries; over every product produced.  And in its crusade to conquer “climate change”, having covered every available plot of land with windmills and solar panels with the population facing world-wide starvation, the ruling elitists will have a change of heart. They will come to tell the masses that a new study reveals oil, gas, coal and nuclear were “clean and renewable” after all.  Who knew?

Something that Murphy and his many ‘climate change’ compatriots never speak of is the fact that well over 13,000 qualified American scientists have proclaimed, repeatedly, and been suppressed by both the media and politicians, that there is absolutely no scientific proof that there is any ‘climate change’ that can be traced to human activities. Furthermore, during the last 24 months we have one of the most significant cool downs of the global ‘mean’ temperature on record.  And despite the claim made by Al Gore that the polar ice caps would be devoid of all ice by 2010, here we are on 2019 with there now being more ice at the poles than ever before.

That this ‘climate change’ nonsense continues to be what the Democrats seem to have pinned their hopes on for defeating President Trump is something that I find, quite frankly, more than a little strange.  Also now we have ‘Con Man’ Cory Booker out there declaring that “this planet simply cannot sustain people eating meat.”   I can’t help but wonder who, but the most committed Democrats, takes any of this craziness seriously. Climate change continues to be a theory in search of any actual scientific proof of its existence.  Because any science used to support its existence has been up to this point highly suspect to say the least.  It’s a manufactured crisis.

And when you stop and consider the fact that 99.9 percent of all those who profess to have some level of belief in what is really nothing more than a scam to redistribute wealth, are all on the left, shouldn’t that cause one to pause.  And the continuing insults and name-calling directed at those who remain unconvinced, or at least a bit skeptical, should also cause one to question the motivation of those behind the perpetuating of the yet to be proven theory of ‘climate change.’  And ask yourself, have you ever been as certain about anything in your life, as these people are about ‘climate change’?  I know I haven’t.   It’s a religion to some of these people.


Climate Change 26

I feel pretty confident in saying that most reasonably intelligent people have a rather difficult time buying into the nonsensical ‘theory’ of ‘global warming”, “climate change”, “climate disruption” or whatever it is that the true believers are calling it these days.  Most Americans are able to recognize what is truly going on here by simply looking at who it is that’s pushing this cockamamie theory which we’re told is based on exhaustive scientific research, when in fact there is very little actual scientific proof that supports it at all.  While supporters argue that it is now settled science that manmade “climate change” is in fact taking place, it’s roughly 80 graphs from the 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017 that would seem to take exception to that claim.

Now before anyone comes unglued, I think we can all agree that by “global warming” these papers are not making reference to the mild warming of around 0.8 degrees Celsius that the planet has experienced since the middle of the 19th century as the world crawled out of the Little Ice Age.  Pretty much everyone, alarmists and skeptics alike, is agreed on that.  Rather, they define “global warming” in the sense that it is most commonly used today by grant-troughing scientists, and huxter politicians, and scaremongering green activists, and brainwashed state-controlled media environmental correspondents.  “Global warming” as in the scary, historically unprecedented, primarily man-made phenomenon which we must address urgently before the icecaps melt and the Pacific islands disappear.

What all of these papers argue, in their different ways, is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) — is a fake artifact.  That is, all these different experts from around the world, be it from China, Russia, Canada, the U.S., Italy, or elsewhere, have been looking closely at different aspects of the global warming puzzle in various regions and on different timescales and came to the conclusion in irreproachable, peer-reviewed scientific ways that there is no evidence to support the global warming scare story.  Late 20th century and early 21st century global warming, they show, is neither dramatic, nor unusual, nor, for that matter, scary.  So I feel confident in being able to ignore such climate change alarmists as Al Gore and John Kerry-Heinz.

The intellectually corrupt and mendacious alarmist science establishment would have us believe that climate skepticism is a minority activity, the preserve of a few cranks, championed only by people who don’t do the science.  But this is just pure propaganda.  There are dozens of reputable scientists from around the world with no axe to grind collaborating on studies which all corroborate, independently and rigorously, the increasingly respectable view that “man-made global warming” just isn’t a thing.  Not that it ever was a thing, really. This debate was always about left-wing ideology, quasi-religious hysteria, and “follow the money” corruption, never about “science.”  Still, it’s always a comfort to know that “the science” is on our side as well.  And how the Greenies must hate that.

In an attempt to point out just how dishonest those on the left can be let’s all take a brief trip down memory lane and recall some of the other great lies that those on the left have been telling for decades.  For instance, do you recall how it was that Rachel Carson, courtesy of her fictional ‘masterpiece’, Silent Spring, got DDT banned?  The result being, of course, that millions of people died worldwide but we saved the mosquito.  Or how Ralph Nader got the Corvair banned because of gas tank hysteria?   And there was Jimmy Carter, remember him, he told us back in 1978 that the world would run out of oil by 1980.  Jimmy was, and remains to this day, a complete moron.  And it was Carl Sagan who once said that Saddam’s oil well fires in Kuwait would usher in an ice age, not global warming.

Then came the global warming and ‘climate change’ hysteria after which not one major hurricane has hit the U.S. in over 10 years, the longest stretch since records began being kept.  So when it became a bit more difficult to sell the notion of ‘global warming’, the nomenclature was changed to ‘climate change’, on a planet where the climate has been changing for millions of years.  So, yeah, they’re liars, and anyone who assigns any amount of credibility to these folks (say like the idiotic Supreme Court Justice Kennedy when he deemed CO2 a pollutant) is a fool.  Trees and all other foliage LOVE CO2. They eat it and emit oxygen.  Extrapolate from there and you’ll know what the solution is!!  We already have made HUGE strides in reducing pollution.  Just look at the pollution map at the World Health Org.

‘Climate change’ has become a religion.  It’s now “cool and intelligent” to be self-righteously angry at your own country, industry, people, etc.  Just don’t ask any ONE of these climate zealots to stop using any of the 6,000 items that are petroleum based because they’d have to start with their cellphones.  Or ask them to fly with the little people where they’d be packed in like sardines and have to be subjected to the TSA perverts instead of flying on their private jets.  You see, the only people who are called upon to make the ‘necessary’ sacrifices for the benefit of all are those of us who comprise that group looked upon as being the unwashed masses.  We’re far too unsophisticated, and therefore nowhere near deserving of those privileges enjoyed by society’s elites, so the brunt of the burden falls upon us.

Look, I have no problem with valid research that follows the scientific process. I do have a problem with spending trillions of dollars on an ‘alleged’ problem based on an anomaly that no one has actually proven even exists.  I have a problem with tax hungry politicians who have zero acumen in any science getting involved with the research. I have a problem with totalitarians using fictitious world-ending scenarios to scare the masses into compliance with their agenda. I have a problem with people pretending that an alleged “consensus” has any place in the scientific method. And, I have a problem when research shows the base premise of the theory under study shows the theory itself to be completely flawed; and yet, the researchers continue on their merry way and soak up tax dollars anyway.

Totalitarians have been busy trying to scare the masses since before the dawn of history.  It’s what they do.  They only do it on a larger, faster and more efficient scale now.  And in an effort to coerce those of us who are non-believers into keeping silent that we are often times referred to as being the dreaded ‘deniers’ of ‘climate change’ and as such we are to be forever shunned.  As if that really matters to any of us who refuse to be fooled into believing such nonsense.  Personally, I wear that moniker as a badge of honor just as I do when lumped in with those who are called ‘Flat Earthers’ for no other reason than they are able to understand what is really going on here.  And I know that I am far from being the only one proud to be looked down upon by these ‘climate change’ loons.

Because it was a recent Rasmussen Poll that showed 41 percent of Americans agree with President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate change agreement, because sticking with the deal would increase energy costs.  Most Americans don’t want to pay much, if anything, to fight “global warming.”  Rasmussen wrote about its poll: “President Trump pulled the United States out of the Paris anti-global warming agreement last week in part because of his concern about its potential impact on the U.S. economy.”  And it was of the 41 percent who said the deal would increase energy costs for Americans that Rasmussen said, “Voters tend to agree the accord would have led to increased energy costs, and most remain unwilling to pay much, if anything, more to fight global warming.”

Rasmussen reported, “Just 20% believe the requirement would decrease the cost of energy, while 23% say it would have no impact,” and noted that 16 percent of poll takers were not sure.  Not sure?  In another Rasmussen poll, the majority of respondents, or 60 percent, said Congress should vote on any such agreement.  It was ex-president Barry Obummer who signed the Paris “executive agreement” in 2015 without the consent of Congress.  And those who were paying attention during the last presidential election are aware Hitlery made it quite clear that she too was a devout follower of the ‘climate change’ religion, to the point where she fully intended on putting coal mining companies and therefore coal miners out of business.   Maybe that too can be blamed on the Russians.  Ya think?


Kerry 21

When there have been 30,000 people killed by Muslim terrorists just since January of last year and an unknown number killed during the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, I’m more than a bit curious how it is that Secretary of State John Kerry-Heinz can so steadfastly insist, and as recently as last Friday, that ‘climate change’ is as dangerous as the threats posed by the Islamic State and other Muslim extremist groups.  And I’d like to know how many people have died during that same period of time whose cause of death can be listed as “climate change.”

Kerry-Heinz spoke last Friday in Vienna at an international climate change conference attended by parties to the 1987 Montreal Protocol, a global treaty to end the use of many chlorofluorocarbons from aerosols and refrigerants that deplete the ozone layer.  Kerry-Heinz said the issue might not get as much attention as terrorism but that the meeting is as important as a gathering he hosted on Thursday in Washington on combating the Islamic State.  He said, “What you are doing here right now is of equal importance, because it has the ability literally to save life on this planet.”

Treaty members continue to insist that they have been able to attain some level of success, including a healing of an ozone hole over Antarctica.  Now they are busying trying to adopt yet another amendment, one that would phase out substances that replaced chlorofluorocarbons, called hydrofluorocarbons.  We’re told that they supposedly trap more heat than carbon dioxide but are less plentiful.  Participants in the Vienna meeting hope to find consensus on an amendment that could be adopted at the next meeting of the parties in Kigali, Rwanda, this October.

But how about some actual facts, Mr. Kerry-Heinz, instead of your idiotic pabulum that’s nothing more than propaganda.  Like the fact that during 2015 alone there were 2858 Islamic attacks in 53 different countries, in which 27,588 people were murdered and 26,136 injured.  And for comparison, in 2001 there were 177 Islamic attacks in just 13 countries, in which 3,537 people were killed and 3,561 injured.  If you think that any real Muslim is your friend, you are ignorant of Islam. So I ask you again, Mr. Kerry-Heinz, how many is it that have died from climate change?

And too, Mr. Kerry-Heinz, let’s also discuss the fact of how it’s the personal behavior of 1% of the U. S. population results in their CO2 footprint being 50 times the average of the remaining 99%. While this surprises no one, and you are aware of this, what most people fail to realize is this means that this small group of wealth individuals is responsible for more than 33% of ALL U. S. CO2 emissions and were they to only emit 25 time the average of the other 99%, via their personal behavior, overall U. S. CO2 emissions would immediately (not over decades) decline by 17%.

And can you please explain to all of us rubes, Mr. Kerry-Heinz, why all the plans being implemented and proposed will allow this same small group to continue their behavior without any reductions in their CO2 emissions while financially hammering we the lower income and middle classes, just for being alive. We know you care (because you tell us) and we know this is an emergency (again because you tell us) so PLEASE explain the logic behind your plans. Hurry, because there precious little time to waste. Should we all wait for your explanation or can you finally admit it’s all just a scam.

Let’s review what else Mr. Kerry-Heinz has told us.  He told us he earned 3 Purple Hearts in Vietnam, he just left out the fact that two of them were for self-inflicted wounds.  He told us that he spent Christmas of 1972 in Cambodia, but his shipmates confirmed that they were 30 miles from Cambodia.  He told us that American soldiers in Vietnam habitually committed War Crimes.  And he told us that the 14 Point Vietnam Peace Plan he presented to Congress was his, it was the Peace Plan he got in Paris when he was “negotiating” the North Vietnamese and Vietnam Cong.

And John Kerry-Heinz told us that the agreement reached with Iran last year was the absolute best deal that we could get and Iran would adhere to every point or we would cancel the deal.  And has also told us, on a number of occasions, that Barry is the greatest American president, which is laughable.  And now he is lying to us, yet, again about “Climate Change”. But then again, he is a liberal which means he lies first, last, and always.  Get the straight jacket ready, next will be air-conditioners and refrigerators because of climate change, this man is a complete idiot, period.