Carter 04

So what is it about ex-presidents, particularly those of the Democrat persuasion, that makes them think we truly care what they think?  Which brings me to he who, until very recently, politically speaking, had the reputation of being the worst president this country has ever had and who apparently does not have a very high opinion of our current president.  Not that it matters, really, as no one other than those in the Democrat Party, I guess, actually values the opinion of this demented old fool.  And it is in dragging out his raggedy old ass that Democrats reveal just how desperate they have now become in their effort to avoid having to face President Trump in 2020.  I just don’t see how someone with his dismal legacy will be of much help.

And yet it was just this past Friday that ex-president Jimmy Carter very boldly declared that President Trump’s victory in 2016 was essentially illegitimate due to supposed Russian interference in that election.  Now mind you, he had absolutely zero proof to back up his idiotic claim, but since when does someone who is a Democrat ever required to provide proof to back up the accusations that they make.  It was during a panel discussion on, of all things, human rights issues there at the ‘Carter Center’ that this bonehead contended that a proper investigation into the extent of Russian meddling would, in fact, reveal President Trump did not win the White House.  But didn’t we pay Mr. Mueller millions of taxpayer dollars to do exactly that?

Carter was also asked by I’m not sure who, how the current administration should deal with alleged election meddling.  Carter said, “The president himself should condemn it.”  Carter went on to say, “Admit that it happened, which 16 intelligence agencies have already agreed to say.”  He said, “There’s no doubt the Russians did interfere in the election and I think the interference, although not yet quantified, if fully investigated, will show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016.”  And he added, “He lost the election and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”  If there was ever any doubt that Carter was, and is, little more than a partisan political hack that doubt has now been thoroughly debunked!

And it was all just so odd to hear coming from the very same man whose legacy as president is one that has him being responsible for installing the Terrorist Regime of Iran, seeing it as being a good idea to give up the Panama Canal before the lease was up, allowing the American Embassy in Iran to be held hostage for over a year, bringing about the misery index along with double digit interest rates and double digit unemployment, and setting into motion, by signing into law something called ‘The Community Re-Investment Act’ that which would ultimately result in he who would replace Carter as being the ‘Worst President in American History’, Barack Obama, getting elected.  Carter was a failure as president on so many different levels.

Jimmy Carter was the most ineffectual president in modern American history.  His economic and foreign policies were abysmal.  Carter was not a bad man, but he was an inept president, with a cadre of morons working for him.  Barry ‘O’, on the other hand, was, and remains to this day, nothing short of pure evil, full of malevolence toward the United States, especially towards whites.  The level of corruption and the number of scandals that occurred during his tenure was truly remarkable, to the point that our country was lucky to survive.  He was wrong about almost everything but he didn’t care as it was his mission to “fundamentally transform” America.   We have yet to find out the extent to which he may have permanently affected our country.

For those lucky enough to have missed the Carter years, and may therefore be unfamiliar with why it is that so many folks once referred to him as this nation’s worst president, here are but a few highlights: Carter gave us the Iranian hostage crisis, where STUDENTS took over our embassy and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Carter gave us an annual inflation rate of 12% in a sluggish economy. Carter gave us spiraling gas prices.  Carter routinely demonstrated how he was in over his head.  It became rather obvious, rather quickly, that being president as well as Commander in Chief was something that he simply lacked the aptitude for.  The fact that he was elected had far more to do with timing than it had to do with his political prowess.

Radical Islam was nearly extinct until Jimmy Carter came along and refused to help the Shah of Iran during initial protests by a few radicals, which eventually led to a full blown Islamic revolution.  Then there was the Camp David peace talks during which Carter insisted Israel give back the Sinai to Egypt, and hand the West Bank to Jordan, and give the temple mount security zone to Jordanian control. Golan Heights back to Syria.  In other words give back everything Israel gained during the 6 day war. The threats that we continue to face to this day from this very same region of the globe are a direct result of Carter’s actions, or inactions, in the region during his presidency.  Carter, as do most Democrats had an odd definition of diplomacy.

Think about what would have happened if it had been Jimmy Carter who had been president during World War II.  It’s very unlikely that Carter would not have retaliated against Japan, McArthur never would have returned to Philippines, U.S. would have surrendered to Japan and England would now be Germany.  Because D-Day would have never happened and he most certainly would never dropped the atomic bombs that caused Japan to finally surrender and which ultimately saved more lives than were lost because of the bombs.  Jimmy Carter’s goal was always to surrender at all costs because all wars cannot be won so simply surrender to avoid war altogether.  Jimmy Carter was then, and he remains to this very day, little more than an idiot.

And if we’re going to have a serious discussion about interference in our election process than we’re going to need to talk about the actual interference that was made possible, and even actively participated in, by the likes of Google, Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, to name just a few, who blocked conservatives in their attempt to affect the 2016 election outcome?  And make no mistake I have no doubt that they are already very busy at work formulating their plan about how best to have the greatest impact possible on the 2020 election, and to ensure their desired result.  But Democrats like Carter have no interest in doing that, because doing so might have a negative impact on the Democrats’ ability to win elections.

Carter would serve himself better by keeping his mouth shut instead of insisting upon continuing to open it leaving no doubt that he is little more than the addle-headed old fool we all know him to be. Nearly forty years ago he was essentially thrown out of office after one term. His administration stood as being the most inept until Barry ‘O’ came along, but where Carter was merely inept, Barry was corrupt to the extreme.  And it was Barry who would easily eclipse Carter as being this nation’s worst president. Time tends to heal all things and the public’s disapproval of Carter was beginning to moderate.  But it is once again that he has proven the perception we had of him in 1980 when he was thrown out of office was the correct one.

I am curious about something though.  I’m wondering if Carter somehow thinks it’s a bad thing that President Trump has made it possible for us to have achieved the lowest unemployment rate for blacks in over two decades and the lowest for women in forever.  Or that we now have over 4 million fewer Americans having to rely on food stamps?  And does Carter think it bad that, thanks to the president significantly reducing government regulations, companies are now able to expand and hire more people.  And I’m sure that Carter is none too happy that President Trump is working hard to rebuild our military, and he’s likely disappointed that we won’t be sending pallets of cash any country that is a state sponsor of terrorism.

Like ex-vice president ‘Creep Joe’ Biden, ex-president Jimmy Carter should realize that his time was essentially up decades ago and that his comments are no more relevant than other relics from our political past.  He is now close to 100 and has no more insight than his penchant for spewing that which is pure leftist political drivel. Of course he still considers himself a Democrat, and he seems to care very little about how far to the left his beloved Democrat Party has been moved. Carter has come to belong to a little club of other no-longer relevant leftist losers who need to go away. Folks like John Kerry-Heinz and Hitlery while still around spreading hate just need to go away.  They are now out of office and America is all the better for it.


Democrats 88

Well after hearing about all that was said by the candidates during what was the first round of Democrat presidential debates that I must say they have certainly shown themselves to be a very scary bunch.   And for the life of me I just can’t figure out how it is that any one of them could ever be considered to be a viable candidate for the highest office in the land.  Such a prospect is truly frightening!  And should it be any of these Democrat candidates who end up being successful in their effort to defeat President Trump, then this country that I love, this country in whose service I spent 24 years of my life, will be placed squarely on the road to utter and complete destruction.  Of that I have absolutely no doubt, and neither should you!

That said, we will have to wait and see just how, and if, these debates actually succeed in moving the needle in any particular direction regarding the candidates’ standing in relation to one another.  But what these two debates have most certainly done is to clarify, and in a very significant way, a Democrat Party that is now bound and determined to confiscate our guns, our money and our health insurance. Oh, and Democrats also seem quite determined to decriminalize illegal immigration and give our health insurance to illegal aliens.  Personally, if I was to name a winner of these debates I would have to say it was President Trump, because he is the only person standing between us and what it is that any of these Democrats will inflict upon us.

The Democrat Party’s vision for America, and I say this without any amount of exaggeration, is one where floods of illegal aliens will be allowed to legally enter our country an after doing so will be provided with free healthcare and all manner of welfare benefits while American citizens are stripped of their health insurance, their ability to defend themselves, forced to pay reparations, and hit with massive tax increases to pay for all the ‘free’ stuff created.  How will our hospitals, doctors, and schools handle this influx of millions of illegals?  What I find to be more than little worrisome is the fact that not many people are yet paying attention.  This is not like the old days when one could simply sit back until the last month of a campaign.

For me, what these ‘debates’ accomplished was to remove any and all doubt about how today’s Democrats are now virtually Hell bent on destroying America. They’re talking about forgiving student loans, reparations (although it was only the Democrats who owned slaves), free education, food and medical for criminal illegal aliens.  And there’s Socialized Medicine in the form of ‘Medicare for All, except for members of Congress. The cost of which would be roughly three times our GNP, or around $23 Trillion.  Now keep in mind, the combined wealth of all rich people in America is $21 Trillion, so who is it that’s going to footing the bill for all this ‘free’ stuff when, like in every other Socialist country, there is nothing left of the middle class.

In years past while Democrats may have sought to advance much of the same types of policies, they were far more clandestine about it and showed a certain reluctance in doing so in front of television cameras.  So to hear this much hateful anti-America rhetoric, from 20+ privileged presidential candidates is something new.  So what are Democrats, really?  Well to put it in very simple terms, Democrats are a very destructive, and toxic group of extremists.  They are a corrosive amalgamate of domestic terrorists, enemies of the people as well as enemies of the estate.  Their party is an organization of individuals who are well versed in all manner of deception, corruption and fraud, and have taken part in actions that can easily be called treason.

So I’m curious, now that we have heard from those Democrats now seeking to be president who in their right mind would EVER want to have ANY of these people in charge of running the country?   And what did any of them say that actually made even a lick of sense, or was sufficient to convince anyone that their vision of America, and of the future is worthy of support?  Not a one of them seems to be living in the real world, and none of them seem above saying absolutely anything in their effort to get themselves elected.  Now I fully understand that a lot of people don’t like Donald Trump, but look back at the condition of the country under Barry ‘O’, and then look at it now.  And ask yourself are you better off today than you were then.

There’s no doubt about it. Every Democrat running for the nomination is little more than a disaster waiting to happen.  All President Trump has to do is point out that places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and New York all of which are run, and have been run for decades, wholly by Liberal Democrats.  These same cities have become little more than cesspools of violence, crime and poverty.  The American people are quite literally surrounded by examples of what the Democrats wish to inflict upon all of American.  Invite Democrats to explain how all of those places came to be such abject failures even though billions of taxpayer dollars have been, and continue to be, poured into them. Democrats only destroy, they create only misery.

Unfortunately, the number of uneducated, indoctrinated and willfully ignorant Americans is growing at an alarming rate. It’s only a matter of time before these people are the majority.  By the time they realize that Socialism is for the people and not for the Socialists, it will be too late. I am as much a hardcore patriot as anyone, but I am not a fool.  I see the writing on the wall. Once the Democrat Party gains control of all three branches of our government, it is over.  Our courts will be filled with progressive, activist judges more concerned with advancing a political agenda than protecting the Constitution which will become irrelevant. The America we know now will be gone forever.  I pray that I am wrong, that I’m overreacting.



I think we can file under, ‘sure didn’t see that coming’, the fact that 3 of the least-patriotic states in America are controlled by Democrats in political office.  Now I don’t know about anyone else, but realizing just how patriotic Democrats are known to be I was absolutely shocked to hear this news.  Actually, I wasn’t really all that surprised, primarily because it’s a pretty common knowledge that Democrats hate this country.  I often think it must be a prerequisite to be permitted to join the party.

Anyway, so how is it, you may ask, that I come by such information?  Well, apparently there was a recent survey that was done by someone, or something, called WalletHub.  This survey looked at 13 indicators of how people express patriotism— including military enrollment, voting in the 2016 presidential election, and volunteering for AmeriCorps, and it was this survey that found that the three least-patriotic states had been controlled by Democrats serving in public office.

Of the bottom three states— California, New York, and New Jersey— all of the states have Democrat-majority legislatures and a Democrat serving as governor. On a scale of 1 to 50, for example, New Jersey and New York rank toward the bottom in terms of military enrollment— with New Jersey taking 48 on the list while New York is even lower coming in at 49.  New Jersey and New York also have the lowest number of veterans per capita, which is also according to this same WalletHub survey.

The three states ranked low in terms of civic engagement as well. California ranked near the bottom for civic engagement, coming in at 48 on the list. It also has a low-volunteer rate, making it 46th in the nation for volunteers.  Overall, the survey found that red states had higher levels of patriotism than blue states due to their high levels of civic and military engagement.  The most patriotic states on the list included New Hampshire, Vermont, Wyoming, Utah, and Idaho.  Vermont caught me by surprise.

So I think it safe to say that when it comes to the religion that is Liberalism and/or progressivism, the greatest sin that one can commit, and one that virtually guarantees one will burn in Hell, is to admit that you possess a love, no matter how minute, for your country and to exhibit ANY sort of behavior that might be construed as being patriotic.  You see, in order to be viewed as a good Democrat you MUST agree that America is responsible for every evil that takes place anywhere on the entire planet!

At the end of the day I don’t think any of us really needed some survey to tell us just how unpatriotic Democrats are.  If after seeing how the party has shifted so far to the left you still haven’t been able to figure that out then you’re either blind or just plain stupid.  But one thing Democrats do love to talk about is what they define as being “American values,” which are really something else entirely.  Because the ‘values’ these people espouse bear little or no resemblance to true ‘American’ values.

Let’s face it, it’s nearly every time one turns around that Democrats are coming out in support of some new, and even more twisted, behavior or policy issue.  And you have to ask yourself, how is it that support for such things as completely open borders, abortion at any time during pregnancy right up to, and even after, delivery, free healthcare and education for those in this country illegally or men using women’s restrooms, can in any way be described as ‘American values?’  That’s just nuts!

But don’t you dare EVER question their patriotism because, oddly enough, they seem to take great offense to that.  This despite the fact that it’s always some Democrat who’s heard proudly declaring that America was NEVER great, and lecturing us all on how America is nothing but a racist, misogynistic, homophobic, militaristic, no good kind of country that the world would have been far better off had it never existed.  So obviously, Democrats define patriotism far differently than the rest of us.


RINOs 27

I gotta tell you I am way past being fed up with our pathetic cadre of RINO ‘shitbird’ Republicans in Democrat clothing who seem all too willing to join with Democrat scum in attacking the president.  Why don’t they just become Democrats and get it over with?  Now while nothing that Mitt Romney does or says really surprises me anymore, it’s his trusty sidekick from Iowa, Joni Ernst, that keeps making pretty clear that she too is little more than a fraud who was apparently able to get herself elected under false pretenses.  Both of these gutless wonders need to be removed from office at the earliest possible convenience, as neither of them seem to be quite up to the task.

You see, it’s Romney and his fellow RINO sidekick from there in ‘The Swamp’, who now seem determined to swallow the imbecilic drivel recently spewed by an obviously demented E. Jean Carroll’s who has now apparently claimed in her new book, that Donald Trump raped her 23 years ago.  And while many of his Republican colleagues have remained silent on the issue, or come out in support of the president, Romney has now claimed that the accusation now being made by Ms. Carroll, is a “serious” allegation.  Now most people would be able to see this woman for what she is, an obviously nutcase who is doing nothing more than trying to sell her book.

And let’s not forget that it was this same RINO stooge, Ernst, who also recently played a pretty significant role in causing Stephen Moore, who was an ideal pick for the Fed just a few months back, to withdraw his nomination.  That too involved events from 20+ years ago.  So it should be fairly obvious to even the most casual of observers that she is really nothing more than another faux conservative who has no business being in the position that she currently finds herself.  She obviously conned the good voters of Iowa into believe that she was something that she most definitely is not, and once she was safely elected it would seem her true colors rushed to the surface.

And it was Romney who, in trying to justify his most recent act of treachery, said, “It’s a very serious allegation.”   And it was from there that this moron went on to say, “I hope that it is fully evaluated. The President said it didn’t happen and I certainly hope that’s the case.”  Meanwhile it was the braindead Ernst who argued that this latest accuser should be interviewed and that “additional information” is needed.  She told CNN,“I think anybody that makes an accusation like that, they should come forward.”  And then added, “But obviously there has to be some additional information. They need to interview her. They need to visit with him.”

And apparently not wanting to be left out it was their fellow RINO John Thune who referred to Ms. Carroll’s allegation against the president as “unacceptable, deplorable behavior.” Thune also said because “the President is denying them, I can’t comment on, them because I don’t know what the truth is.”  Right, so it’s in Thune that we have yet another moron who doesn’t belong in the Senate as he seems far more interested in attacking our Republican president than in taking any kind of stand against that which is so very obviously a bunch of politically motivated bull shit!  These RINOs make me sick.  There’s not a backbone to be found among them!

On Monday, during an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper regarding this most recent alleged wrong doing by Mr. Trump, the accuser, Ms. Carrol, drew criticism after she claimed that “most people think of rape as being sexy – think of the fantasies.”  Carroll also said, “The word rape carries so many sexual connotations.”  But apparently even bizarre comments such as these were not sufficient to convince folks like Romney and Ernst that she’s a bit of a nut.  Because, as always, what matters most is the fact that it is at Donald Trump that her idiotic accusations are aimed.  And nothing else is really needed by these pillars of American politics.

With Romney, I think, it’s always been little more than a case of jealousy.  He had his chance to be president and, to be honest, he blew it.  His allowed his inner wimp to take over and thus simply folded like a cheap suit.  Perhaps if he had been a bit more like Donald Trump he just might have one.  With Ernst, she managed to use her prior military service to get herself elected and has pretty much been little more than a disappointment ever since the day she arrived in the Senate.  While I would like to hope that the good folks of both Utah and Iowa would correct their errors the next time these two are up for re-election, I doubt that it will happen.

But I must say I am a little curious about where all of this new found ferocity might have been back when he was running against Barry ‘O’?  I mean if he had had just half of this fierceness back then, he might have seen fit to expose what were the endless attempts by Barry to destroy America and actually have won in a landslide.  But nope, instead he chose to simply wimp out.  Now all of a sudden he decides to prove he’s finally grown a pair by choosing to trash and slander the guy who endorsed him and had been his friend.  You lost Mitt, get over it.  Put your big boy pants on and do some good for the country. Trashing the president only makes you look petty and small.

And so just when you thought Romney, traitor to his party, constituents and our beloved Constitutional Republic, couldn’t possibly sink any lower, he outdoes himself!  Romney is as close to the moral equivalent of Hitlery that exists anywhere in the Republican Party.  He literally begged for Trump’s endorsement back in 2012 only to turn against him four years later as one of the president’s more vocal distractors.  Yet he was able to convince President Trump into giving him an endorsement so he could then get elected to the U.S. Senate.  And it has been since being elected that he has been doing everything he can think of to bring down President Trump.  What a guy.



In going back to the very beginning of this our current 2020 presidential campaign season, just what is it that any of us have learned thus far about those on the Democrat side who are now all vying to be the one to take on President Trump in the next election.  Well, for one thing it would seem that there is pretty much nothing that they will not promise, and even less that they won’t somehow make ‘free’ to those who need only to vote Democrat.  Vote Democrat and you will be rewarded.

As a for instance, it was just this past Monday that nine of our hate America Democrat presidential hopefuls, including ‘front-runners’ ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden, along with Commies Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, all attended something called the ‘Poor People’s Moral Action Congress’, and what was witnessed by those in attendance was pandering on a near epic scale with each of these contenders desperate in their attempts to see just who it was that could promise the most ‘free’ stuff.

It really was quite the spectacle for anyone who actually chooses to work for a living. Apparently none of these candidates believe that actually having a job is the way to go when trying to come up with a way that would actually result in either ending poverty all together or at least to reduce significantly the number of people living in poverty.  For them, “work” seems nothing more than a dirty word. Their approach is to take money from those folks who work and to hand it over to those who don’t.

And please don’t anyone be fooled by this group, the ‘Moral Action Congress.’ There’s nothing moral about forcing hardworking people to support those who, for whatever reason, feel that they are somehow above having to work to support themselves.  Sadly, it is now one in every five American households that lives entirely, or mostly, off government’ benefits.’  And a shocking three-quarters of able-bodied food stamp recipients, with no children, still don’t feel the need to work, even part time.

So anyway Monday’s little gathering, the supposed focus of which was supposed to be poverty, was led by those claiming to be disciples of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., but in reality are anything but, since most of their time was spent on distorting King’s message.  Because it was the organizers of this freak show who demand that the government actually guarantee everyone an annual income, free college, free health care for all and a “decent house to live in.” They claim these are “rights.”  Seriously?

But people who works for a living knows better. These are not, in any way, rights that the government, in any way, owes you. These are things that you go out and earn for yourself.  And you know, let’s not forget that what the government giveth, the government can, just as easily, taketh away.  And what you earn, what you go and work for, is yours.  But I guess a lot of people see taking all that ‘free’ stuff as being worth the risk as long as they are not being forced to go to work every day.

And it was the event’s organizer, Rev. William Barber, who railed about how it is that nearly half the nation, 150 million people, is mired in poverty and suffering.  Now you’d have to be a complete moron, or a very committed Democrat, not to realize that that is really nothing more than a blatant lie, though none of the candidates apparently saw the need to set the record straight.  So here we have yet another supposed man of God doing little more than to spread hate and discontent.

Contrary to the good ‘reverend,’ the truth is that as of 2017 40 million people, or about 12 percent of the population, earned less than the federal poverty line, which is currently $12,490 for a single person and $25,750 for a family of four.  And also what the reverend conveniently ignores is the fact that almost no one actually lives on that.  Because all but about 3 percent collect some sort of welfare payments that lift them out of poverty. So they depend on government, instead of themselves.

Our booming economy, the same one that ‘Creepy Joe’ is now demanding credit for having created, is a chance to turn all of that around and to help the poor finally escape their continuing dependence on the government.  Employers are now dropping such requirements as college and prior experience in order to hire more people.  It’s not jobs that are scarce.  It’s workers that are scarce.  And yet, oddly enough, not one candidate at this poverty event even bothered to bring up the subject of jobs.

In fact, far from promoting work, these Democrats, every single one of them, now running for president wouldn’t hesitate in the least to throw millions of Americans out of work. The Democrats’ major policy proposals, Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, open borders for illegals and tax hikes on corporations, are all job killers.  Medicare for All alone would cause 2.5 million people, mostly hospital workers and medical administrators, to lose their jobs.

The ‘Green New Deal’, the Democrats’ latest scheme to combat ‘climate change’, threatens the jobs of millions of workers in the mining and oil business.  And yet it’s Bernie Sanders, who says there can be no middle ground on carbon emissions, also claims to be leading a “movement of working people.”  And Democrats continue to favor open borders, and have no problem with illegal immigrants are driving down wages for low-skilled American workers.  So why do you think that is?

Oddly enough it was in what was his final Sunday sermon in 1968 that Rev. King explained that a person who “doesn’t have a job” has “neither life nor liberty.”  And yet here we are heading into the next presidential election and what is the message that we are hearing from every Democrat candidate?  Democrats want fewer jobs forcing more into dependence on government. As well they also support the notion that the poorer they can make America, the better off the rest of the world will be.

I think, especially during the tenure of Barry ‘O’ and ‘Creepy Joe’, it became painfully obvious that then Democrats had little interest in doing anything other than to wreck the economy on purpose.  Barry’s books show that he believes that all the world’s problems are caused by American intervention in other nations’ affairs and he believes that all of the world’s poverty is caused by American wealth.  Therefore, he was driven to do everything that he could to make America weaker and poorer.

And besides, making America poorer has always been good politics for Democrats.  Barry ‘O’ did NOT want the economy to prosper because people who are earning money aren’t as willing to support spending increases as people who depend on government.  Unfortunately, the rest of us were little more than collateral damage in his effort to destroy to the greatest extent possible America ever being able to rebuild what had once been an economy that was the envy of the entire world.


Pelosi 29

So riddle me this, what would any sane individual label as being the most vulnerable of ALL human beings?  And then how is it that the Democrats seem to want it both ways, they want protected the children of those entering into our country illegally and yet they have virtually no problem whatsoever with the fact that over 70 Million defenseless human babies have been allowed to be butchered during the last 45 years.  Would that not be considered a bit hypocritical, and if not, why not?

All which brings me to Nancy Pelosi, our less than stellar Speaker of the House, who earlier this week issued a statement in which she laid out her idiotic reasoning for backing a supplemental spending bill to provide humanitarian assistance to children and families at the U.S.-Mexico border, saying Congress has a “a sacred moral duty” to protect children and families.  But apparently that same “sacred moral duty” does not extend to the unborn babies of American citizens, which comes as no surprise.

And of course included in Pelosi’s statement, which was really little more than yet another rant directed at the president, was her outrage directed at President Trump and for what she described as the president’s “failed policies” for worsening the situation at the border.  She said, “The President’s failed policies have exacerbated the situation at the border, where vulnerable children endure inhumane conditions that threaten their health, well-being and sometimes, tragically, their lives.”

And it was in referencing this specific piece of legislation that Pelosi went on to say, “This legislation provides urgently-needed humanitarian assistance for families, including funding for food, shelter, clothing, medical care and legal assistance, and will relieve the horrific situation of over-crowding and help prevent additional deaths. And we are providing urgent assistance to local communities to help defray their costs of providing humanitarian assistance to asylum seekers.” And zero for border security.

Pelosi continued her rant saying, “The legislation protects families. It does not fund the Administration’s failed mass detention policy, but, instead, funds effective, humane alternatives to detention with a proven track record of success. It places strict limits on influx shelters, protects sponsors from DHS immigration enforcement based on information collected by HHS during the vetting process and creates strong oversight by Congress including to protect unaccompanied children.”

Pelosi seemed to have saved the best for last as she ended her idiotic little statement by saying, “As Members of Congress and as Americans, we have a sacred moral responsibility to protect the human rights and the lives of vulnerable children and families. To do anything less would be an outrageous and unacceptable violation of our oath and our morality.”  Which takes me back to where I started in pointing out the obvious, at least to me, irony in Pelosi’s incessant whining about the president.

The making of such ludicrous comments makes it increasingly more difficult to take any of today’s Democrats seriously.  Because say what you will about the treatment of those ‘poor children’ at the border, whatever discomfort it is that they may be made to suffer, it most certainly pales in comparison to the various methods that Democrats continue to endorse regarding how America’s unborn continue to be butchered in what is the most horrific and savage manner.   Pelosi is pathetic!


Democrats 88

It’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to understand why it would be that ANY rational, reasonably intelligent adult would see the wisdom in voting Democrat here in the 21st century.  Now of course there are any number reasons why your typical millennial or minority may see the ‘necessity’ for voting for the likes of Creepy Joe’ Biden, Liz ‘Fauxcahontas’ Warren, Bernie ‘The Socialist’ Sanders, or even ‘Con Man’ Cory Booker, but that, I suppose, is to be expected.  After all, the promises made of all that ‘free’ stuff is difficult to turn down after you’ve been brainwashed.

In a way I have always been very grateful for the fact that my dad was a proud working class Republican and raised me to be the same.  Frankly, he had very little use for Democrats, as well as for those who tended to vote for Democrats.  And were he alive today I’m sure he’d feel the same way. Because it now seems that the current contest for the Democrat nomination is less of a contest of ideas, since all two dozen candidates are offering the same policy proposals, as they fight to out-pander each other and be the last person standing in this bizarre little contest.

I mean come on folks, how is it that any RESPONSIBLE individual is able to take any of these people seriously?  And if I were a Democrat I would be appalled that ANY of these people are the best my party could come up with to be my party’s nominee for president of my country!  Reparations?  ‘Free’ healthcare for those in this country illegally?  Abolishing all usage of fossil fuels because of non-existent ‘climate change’? Seriously?  These are the kinds of ideas that serious Democrats are supposed to see as a reason to vote for any of these clowns now running?  Good luck with that!!

Take for instance the supposed frontrunner in this political circus, old ‘Creepy Joe.’   It’s in this guy that we seem to have someone who becomes a little less “with it” with each passing day.  Imagine, just for a second, this guy on the debate stage next to Donald Trump.  Now personally, since I’m a Trump supporter, I think it would be hilarious, but I’m not sure if you’re a Democrat you’d feel the same way.   But honestly, as strange as it may sound, ‘Creepy Joe’ sounds like one of the saner ones in the 20+ gaggle now running for the Democrat nomination.  Which is really nuts!

And keeping in mind that I’m on the outside looking in, I’m one of those who thinks that ‘Creepy Joe’s’ time has long since passed. He not only seems like a blast from the past, but he seems to almost yearn for it. He claims a prowess for getting along with people who have different opinions from his and has said it like it remains a virtue in the modern Democrat Party.  Which it does not!  The Democrat Party only views the ability to force people to bend to their will as a virtue these days, so ‘Creepy Joe’s’ argument wouldn’t seem to hold all that much water.  Just sayin’.

And there have been more than a few times during just this most recent contest that ‘Creepy Joe’ has proven to be his own worst enemy.  For instance when he recently referenced two long since dead racist, segregationist Democrats most of the country had never heard of.  This little faux pas not only showed his age, it also made clear just how oblivious he’d become to the current state of his own party.  Not only is saying nice things about bigots from the past not acceptable, not saying horrible things about them has, at least within the Democrat Party, now become required.

And it was by having done so that ‘Creepy Joe’ provided an opportunity that his competition had long been waiting for.  They had been waiting for an opening, any opening, to wound him and this was an opportunity to good to be true and one that one would be foolish not to take full advantage of.  ‘Con Man Cory’ Booker and ‘Hooker’ Harris, along with Commies de Blasio, Warren, Sanders, and the rest of the field jammed in what’s become known as the clown car of candidates collectively expressed their faux outrage. “He said nice things about racists,” they cried.

Well no he didn’t, not really.  At least not in any real way.  Now I’m no defender of ‘Creepy Joe’, but it doesn’t really matter what he meant, the only thing that mattered was that he had provided his competition with an opportunity to pounce, and to project on what he’d said.  And oddly enough, ‘Creepy Joe’ seemed to have been caught completely off guard.  And he really shouldn’t have been, after all, It’s been for the past few decades that the political left has come to make a sport out of taking things out of context and blowing them up into something they were not.

And while this particular tactic has generally been reserved for those who tend to be more conservative, those like ‘Creepy Joe’ had to have known that it was only a matter of time before Democrats would start firing on their own, especially when the stakes are as high as they are now.   And desperation is now at an all-time high among those seeking to be the one to take on President Trump, with potential candidates falling all over themselves to paint themselves as being the most fervent hater of Trump, while at the same time promising to give away the most ‘free’ stuff.

And what seems rather surprising to me is how a guy like ‘Creepy Joe’, who’s been in the business for decades managed to get caught so flat-footed here.  It’s as though he’s been asleep for the last 20 years.  That in itself should be a disqualifier for being president.  What sense does it make to mention a couple of racist Democrats during a time when his party is so determined to rewrite their own history?  The same party that uses race as much now as it did during segregation, albeit differently yet for the same effect. His party has now passed him by and he seems not to have noticed.

But I’m sure it’s in the big scheme of things that he has very little to worry about because it’s likely that in very short order all will soon be forgotten. Hell, at least two MSNBC hosts claimed the two Senators ‘Creepy Joe’ mentioned were Republicans, either because they’re either too stupid to know or, worse, simply too lazy to find out.  But it really doesn’t matter, because all the cover in the world won’t change the fact that ‘Creepy Joe’, while he’ll likely weather this most recent ‘controversy’, is unprepared for the change in the climate of the Democrat Party he’s clearly missed.

Let’s face it, ‘Creepy Joe’ is little more than a relic, of sorts, a throwback to those bygone days of old.  He’s been relegated to being little more than a novelty basking in the glow of name recognition. The only question is whether or not there are enough semi-sane voters left in the Democrat primary to drag him over the finish line before he says something normal they deem truly unforgivable.  And while there are no words to describe just how glad that I am I’m not a part of it, I will likely enjoy the show, if for no other reason than because I am not yet sure of how it all ends.

I can’t help being more than a little thrilled with all of the incredible stupidity that now appears rampant within the Democrat Party. One could not ask for a better set of candidates for President Trump to run against. I cannot wait for the debates where they push one another further and further toward insanity, attack ‘Creepy Joe’s’ rather well documented past and policies and stimulate him to respond with more gaffes along with old ‘Fauxcahonta’ Warren outshining even Hitlery in her irritating sense of smarmy superiority and ‘Bea-Toe’s’ truly stupid outbursts of leftist tripe.

‘Creepy Joe’ built his entire political career on being one whose stump speeches were chock-full of non sequiturs, blatant lies and just plain falsehoods that were always casually dismissed with a mere wave of the liberal limp wrist as being “oh, that’s just Joe being Joe” instead of being brought fully into the light making clear to all that he is little more than political opportunist and a panderer.  He isn’t used to people looking into the archives and doing a little fact-checking of their own. And so as with everything, there is no honor among thieves, neither is there among Democrats.


biden 34

So in his effort to win the presidential sweepstakes and be selected as the Democrat who takes on the president in 2020, ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden has decided to make a pretty bold claim.  His claim?  That this booming economy we are now experiencing has everything to do with the policies put into place by his former boss, Barry ‘O’, and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the policies that have since been put in place by President Trump.  So a guy who was part of the duo who blamed everything that went sour during their tenure on President Bush, now wants to take credit for everything good that has taken place since they left office.  Does he really think we’re that stupid?  I can only assume that that must be the case!

‘Creepy Joe’ has now gone so far as to actually demand that credit be given where no credit is due when it comes to the booming economy under President Trump.  ‘Creepy Joe’ recently took to Twitter to complain, and in so doing tweeted, “Let’s be clear: President Trump inherited a growing economy from the Obama-Biden administration.”  And then he went on to add, “And now, he’s in the process of squandering it.”  Squandering it?  Has ‘Creepy’ not been paying attention, or is he really that dishonest?  What ‘Creepy’ refers to as a “growing economy” is one that was limping along at barely 1 percent growth, since President Trump took office, and slashed thousands of burdensome regulations, it’s now growing at over 3 percent.

So, might ‘Creepy Joe’ actually be justified, in any way, in making this claim?  Well, not exactly.  But that’s only because the list of accomplishments from the era of Barry ‘O’ and ‘Creepy Joe’ includes: 1. Lowest labor participation since the 1970s, 2. Nearly 95 million Americans out of the labor force, 3. Worst economic recovery since the 1940s, 4. Lowest home ownership rate in 50 years, 5. Nearly 13 million more Americans on food stamps under Barry, 6. Over 43 million Americans living in poverty, 7. The median household income lower now than in the 1970s, 8. 1 in 5 families without someone in the workforce, 9. 1 in 6 men ages 18-24 are either incarcerated or out of the workforce and 10. More debt than all other presidents combined.

Now compare all of that against what has taken place, and in just two and a half short years, since President Trump came into the White House.  We now have millions fewer Americans on food stamps, which is likely only because unemployment for blacks, Hispanics, women, Asians and teenagers are now all at all-time lows, and the GDP is now growing at 3 percent annually.  The duo of Barry ‘O’ and ‘Creepy Joe’ was the ONLY administration NEVER to get a 3 percent annual growth, yet ‘Creepy Joe’ now wants credit for something that he’s had nothing to do with?  Again I have to ask, does he truly think we are so stupid as to believe ANYTHING he says?  And his idiotic claims about the economy makes clear that we can’t believe him!

To be honest, this is nothing more than yet another example of what Democrats do best, take credit.  Let’s be honest, Democrats don’t want to actually accomplish anything, they simply want to take credit for it.  Democrats not only can’t improve the economy, they have virtually no interest in doing so. And the reason is simple, because employed, successful and prosperous people tend not to need handouts from Democrats, so Democrats are unable to purchase their votes with taxpayer money. Democrats need poverty in order to create the ‘need’ for Democrats to run to the ‘rescue.’  Democrats don’t help people in poverty, Democrats actually are responsible, and singularly so, for people being in poverty.  It’s all by design.

Democrats like to talk as if they actually favor of a strong, robust economy.  In fact, it was Hitlery who once said, “The economy ALWAYS does better when there is a Democrat in the White House.”  But it’s while they are making such claims that at the very same time they are doing and proposing everything they can that has and/or will actually bring about the weakening of our economy.  So why would they want to do that, you might ask. Well, because these leftwing traitors-to-our-Constitutional Republic know that a weak economy, with tens of millions out of work, it becomes far easier for them to get more people addicted to any number of various government programs, which makes them far more likely to vote for Democrats.

What the Democrats, and the dynamic economic duo Barry ‘O’ and ‘Creepy Joe’, do get credit for is the tanking of our economy, hampering our manufacturing sector as well as our ability to become energy independent, for essentially forcing more people onto the government dole, essentially requiring people to get two part time jobs just to make ends meet as a result of Obamacare bringing to an end millions of full time jobs, for setting race relations back decades, for taking our culture to the depths of Hell courtesy of infanticide, gender confusion, celebrating all manner of depravity and perversion, ushering in what they’re selling as the ‘joys’ of Socialism, and for doing all they could to bring America to the brink of totalitarian tyranny.

It is not too much of a stretch to say that ‘Creepy Joe’ is little more than a lifetime liar and a worthless do nothing with zero accomplishments to show for his over 50 years spent at the taxpayer’s teat as an elected official.  He possesses zero leadership skills or ability, is just another big government advocate, he has never held a private sector job, he’s lazy, he’s old, a complete moron as well as being more than just a little ‘Creepy.’  He has NOTHING to bring to the table to make America better, ‘Creepy’ represents a ‘Barry ‘O’ third term which will only take this country backwards.  I recent read somewhere that a group of economists had said that if Hitlery had been elected our economy would now be toast, not booming.

Life sure must be good when as a sleazy, corrupt politicians can spend 8 years blaming their predecessor for their own failures and then, for over 2 years, attempt to take credit for those things that have been done to improve America that they had absolutely nothing to do with. Our ‘America First’ President has done more in 21/2 years than Democrats have done in decades, Democrats never have any interest in making America better when in charge.  Now they want credit for President Trump’s successes, despite their overwhelming opposition. The Democrats are a treacherous group. They promise Socialism, and the demise of our freedoms. The Democrats have nothing to offer, and only stupid people would vote for any of them.

In looking back it was ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton who still somehow gets credit for the economic boom that was a direct result of President Reagan’s and Bush 41’s economic policies.  George W. Bush was blamed for the crash in 2008, the groundwork of which was first laid in the late 1970s when then president Carter signed into law something called the ‘Community Reinvestment Act’, something that was made even worse by ‘Slick Willy’.  Bush was also blamed for the recession that followed although it was the policies put in place by Barry ‘O’ that only made it worse.  President Trump takes over, makes massive changes and the economy booms, and it’s ‘Creepy Joe’ who then tries to take credit, and who is now running around saying, “I built that!!”



I suppose it should come as no surprise to hear that well-known leftwing Hollyweirdo, and good friend of Venezuelan Socialist dictator Nicolas Maduro, Danny Glubber, is a very enthusiastic supporter of reparations for slavery.  So much so that he recently dragged his raggedy-old-ass off to ‘testify’ before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, yes there really is such a thing, where he argued in favor of instituting a national policy on reparations for descendants of Africans enslaved in the United States, describing it as a “moral, democratic, and economic imperative.”  Personally, I think he’s nothing more than another irrelevant has-been trying his best to claw his way back into the spotlight any way that he can.

And besides the ‘esteemed’ Mr. Glubber it was the members of this particular subcommittee also ‘welcomed’ such luminaries on the subject of reparations as senator and current presidential candidate, ‘Con Man’ Cory Booker, author Ta-Nehisi Coates, and a number of others thought worthy enough to discuss the need for reparations in the wake of subcommittee member Sheila ‘Dumb As A Rock’ Jackson Lee reintroducing H.R. 40 to establish a commission to study reparations.  And it was during his prepared remarks, of which I’m quite sure that he needed more than a little help to compose, Glubber called the hearing “historic.”  What does this loser know of history, nothing!  Which makes him unworthy of being listened to.

Anyway, Glubber expressed appreciation for being given the opportunity to offer his two cents on what he called a “reckoning of a crime against humanity that is foundational to the development of democracy and material well-being” of the United States.  He said, “A national reparations policy is a moral, democratic, and economic imperative.”  And then he went on to detail his ‘supposed’ lineage as a descendant of former slaves saying, “I sit here as a great-grandson of a former slave, Mary Brown, who was freed by the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1st, 1863. I had the fortune of meeting her as a small child.”  I’m guessing that I’m supposed to care about something that I played no part in, although I’m not sure why.

Glubber continued by saying, “Despite much progress over the last centuries, this hearing is yet another important step in the long and heroic struggle of African-Americans to cure the damages inflicted by enslavement, post-emancipation and forced racial exclusionary policies.”  Exactly what damages might this racist boob be referring to?  Are we to believe that we still have blacks today who suffer from some sort of PTSD-like affliction because they had long ago ancestors who might have been slaves?  Between affirmative action and every type of government welfare program imaginable blacks continue to be provided with reparations in one form or another to the tune of TRILLIONS of wasted dollars.  I see no need to provide any more.

And so this idiotic hearing comes amid a growing discussion by those in the Democrat Party regarding the need for reparations. Several of the party’s presidential candidates have endorsed the idea, though they have stopped short of endorsing direct payouts for blacks.  In a Point Taken-Marist poll conducted in 2016, 68 percent of Americans said the country should not pay cash reparations to descendants of slaves to make up for the ‘harm’ caused by slavery and racial discrimination.  About 8 in 10 white Americans said they were opposed to reparations, while it was about 6 in 10 black Americans who said they were in favor.  You can count me in amongst those who stand opposed, it’s a stupid, pointless idea that accomplishes nothing.

But since slavery was 150 years ago how about we talk about reparations for something a little more recent.  Like the millions of middle class Americans who had our lives ruined by ex-president Barry ‘O’ during the years from 2008 to 2016.  I think it would be great if those who ran the government during those 8 years and who were purposefully negligent regarding their oath of office were finally held accountable for their actions, or should I say inaction.  Aren’t we citizens owed reparations for their dishonest behavior?  And doesn’t the liability belong to everyone involved in the corruption from Barry ‘O’ to Chuckie Schumer to Nancy Pelosi? It isn’t just restricted to the Executive Branch, the people were sold out by Congress as well.

Or how about this! Since it was members of the Democrat Party who not only owned slaves, but also actually went to war to keep their slaves, and also since it was the Democrats who enacted Jim Crow laws, and since it was the Democrats who enacted the Fugitive Slaves Act, and since it was the Democrats who resisted Reconstruction, and since it was the Democrats who created the Ku Klux Klan, and since it was the Democrats who resisted desegregation, haven’t Democrats shown, time and again, that if reparations are owed, they are owed by them.  How is it that simply by virtue of my skin color it has somehow now been determined that I owe for something that I took no part in?  It’s all just another ploy to get something for nothing.

If you stop and think about it, it was reparations that began with the 600,000 lives lost in the war to end slavery.  Since then there has been civil rights legislation that granted voting rights, equal housing loans, anti-discrimination laws in education and hiring, Federal education grants, Affirmative Action, and even a Black President. And now a cash payments?  When will the debt finally be paid?  Will a cash payment bring about racial harmony, an end to Police assassinations or retirement for race pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?  No, nothing will ever change and many will simply consider whatever the amount as being too little, too late. You can’t change history.  And therefore nothing will ever cancel the debt.



Call me what you will, but I’ve always been more than a little leery when it comes to trusting ANY politician with the last name of Castro, especially when that politician is a Democrat, and even more so when that politician is a Democrat running to be the president of my country.  When it comes to the 20+ Democrats now vying to be the one to take on President Trump, we’ve heard some pretty outlandish claims being made.  And it would seem that in an effort to ensure he’s seen as nutty as the rest of the presidential wannabes, Julian Castro has made some pretty radical claims as well.

Most recently it was during a recent appearance, just this week, on MSNBC’s Velshi & Ruhle, which frankly is a program that I’ve never heard of, that Castro put forth the idiotic, and blatantly untrue, claim that the U.S.-Mexico border is “as secure as it ever has been” and re-upped his call to dismantle the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.  Now there’s an intelligent reason for voting for this loser.  NOT!  But one thing is for sure, we have yet another Democrat proving that he will say absolutely anything in an attempt to get his sorry ass elected.

Anyway, it’s a brief excerpt that bizarre exchange follows here:

RUHLE: Let’s talk about ICE. The president will have members of ICE working overtime next week, as he is calling for raids looking to deport thousands of undocumented immigrants. If elected, you are calling for the breakup of ICE. If ICE were to be broken up, how would you deal with the millions of undocumented immigrants already here and those who are crossing the border, the thousands who are crossing the border?

CASTRO: As you know, I was the first 2020 candidate to release a comprehensive immigration plan, and I have a completely different vision for how we’re going to do this than this president. I think what people on different sides of the aisle can acknowledge is that this president has failed. He came in saying that he was going to take care of this “immigration problem,” and he hasn’t. And in our name, little children have been separated from their mothers, people are in cages—

RUHLE: —So, what would you do?

CASTRO: What I would do is, number one, I would make sure that we maintain border security, and I believe that our border is as secure as it ever has been. I would ensure that we maintain it. But secondly, I would treat people with compassion and common sense and not with cruelty. I would make sure that we don’t separate families, that we don’t put people in cages, that we treat them like human beings. I would also get to the root of the problem.

Number one, we’ve got to create an immigration judiciary, immigration court system, that has enough judges and support staff to actually get through the asylum claims so that people are not waiting in limbo for years and years. And we got to get to the base challenge in countries like Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala. People are coming over to the United States because they can’t find safety and opportunity there. We need to partner with those countries and I’ve called for a 21st century Marshall Plan, so people can be safe and find opportunities at home instead of coming here.

Nearly every major civilization up until our more recent history has been notably harsh on illegal invaders.  If you were in a high position of government in such times and had the audacity to state something like this, after a few MILLION people had illegally crossed your borders, you would likely have been run out of office.  But, as they say, that was then and this is now.  And it is courtesy of political hacks like Castro that we now essentially not only ‘welcome’ in anyone able to sneak across our border, but once there here we then provide them with all manner of ‘free’ stuff!

Once upon a time people from neighboring countries honored our borders and appreciated the fact that we welcomed many in as temporary seasonal workers, allowing them to earn more here than they could earn back home, before then returning home.  This unspoken ‘agreement’ allowed all to peacefully co-exist in what was a relationship that proved beneficial for all concerned.  However when people began to take advantage of the generosity bestowed upon them and came not to earn extra money, but instead to invade and steal, that ‘agreement’ had been broken.

Just as a locked door is required on a home to keep invaders out, so also is a locked wall at the border needed to keep invaders out.  Although that seems pretty basic, it remains something that those such as Mr. Castro seem unable, or unwilling, to grasp.  I’m quite sure that he keeps the doors to his house locked and is far from welcoming to those who wish to enter uninvited.  But apparently he’s another politician who thinks the same rules should not apply to our country.  We need to welcome in only those who choose to come here legally and who wish to become American citizens.

Sadly our Border Patrol is now longer able to focus on protecting our border, because they’re being forced into having to play babysitter.  The left not only has sent people down south to tell people that if they come to the U.S. they can get welfare as well as a free education, free medical care, etc, but they are also actually financing their journey here. They are working to destroy our country while at the same time laying blame for our growing immigration problem on President.  And, anyone who does not understand this, is either in denial, or has been brainwashed by the left.

Look, there are Americans who support the Democrats for no other reason than because of promises of what’s described as being ‘free’ stuff.  Then, there are those who support them, simply because their parents and grandparents did. These people believe anything their leadership says, because they’re too lazy to actually do any research to see if they’re being told the truth.  The Democrat Party of today is nowhere near the party it was during their grandparents’ day, just as it neither the party of their parents.  That party has now been officially declared as dead.

Castro is politically irrelevant as a candidate, and in need of attention from the press, so what better way to gain a little attention than to say something idiotic that then gets distributed by the press.  This guy’s entire worldview revolves around getting as many illegal aliens across the border as possible, by any and all means. People like this guy, Castro, are all about demographic warfare.  They want to disenfranchise and consign to irrelevance every native English speaker in the land.  It sounds extreme, but seriously, look at the stuff this dude has said. It’s some pretty creepy stuff.