Jesse Jackson 1

Apparently there was a point in time when Jesse ‘The Extortionist’ Jackson had a rather positive opinion of Donald Trump.  In fact Trump was someone who Jackson once described as being a champion of minority empowerment.  In both 1998 and 1999, Trump was an honored guest at the annual Wall Street Conference hosted by the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, Jackson’s DC-based “multi-racial, multi-issue, progressive, international membership organization fighting for social change.”

And in 1998 it was even Jackson who introduced Trump ahead of his speech at the conference.  Jackson stated then that Trump was a model for “people on Wall Street to represent diversity.”  And he went on to add, “We need your building skills, your gusto.”  Jackson introduced Trump — whom he called a “friend” — at the same conference in 1999, where this time he was invited to speak on the “challenges and opportunities to embrace under-served communities.”

And it was also in speaking about Trump that Jackson said, “He is deceptive in that his social style is of such, one can miss his seriousness and commitment to success, which is beyond argument.”  And he went on to say, “When we opened this Wall Street project he gave us space at 40 Wall Street, which was to make a statement about our having a presence there.”   So one would think that since Jackson was once able to call Trump a friend he might be supporting him for president.  But nope.

And yet it was also back then that Jackson had said, “Beyond that, in terms of reaching out and being inclusive, he’s done that too,” Jackson added. “He has this sense of the curious and a will to make things better.”  And he added, “Aside from all of his style, and his pizazz, he’s a serious person who is an effective builder of people.”  But I guess, as they say, that was then and this is now.  Because Jackson seems to have a very different view of Trump today.

Because it’s these days that Jackson has a bit of a different view of the man he once called a friend.  These days Jackson is busy pointing out how it is that Donald Trump, as well as his many followers, are busy helping to create what Jackson calls a rising climate of fear in America which actually contributed to the shocking deaths of five police officers in downtown Dallas.  Jackson said there is an ‘anti-black mood’ in America which has also seen discrimination against immigrants, Muslims and women.

And in opining about what might now be causing the divisive mood in America, Jackson said, ‘Threats to deport 15 million immigrants…threats to build a wall between Mexico who we share 2,000 miles of a border, there’s a permissiveness towards black people [which] is readily apparent and we have been used as scape goats for deeper and deeper economic and cultural fears.’  Asked about Donald Trump and the rise of ultra-conservative groups, Jackson said, ‘He is a factor in that.

Jackson went on to say, ‘It’s not just Trump, it’s the followers of Trump; the blacks, the browns, the Muslims – we’ve been losing rights in the cause of globalization. There is a scapegoating of those who are suffering.’  Asked about how all of this was happening under the first black president and what Barry can do, he said: ‘My appeal to the President is let’s have a White House conference on violence, poverty, racial disparities and the plan to reconstruct – there is no plan to reconstruct.’

But let’s be honest here, shall we?  There was hardly a soul anywhere calling Trump a racist until he ran for president as a Republican.  And if Trump were a Democrat, the press would love him and he’d now likely be up by 20 points.  And am I the only one who views it a bit strange that Trump events are rather massive when compared to Hitlery’s, and yet polls always show him trailing.  In every election I can remember since 1972, the candidate drawing the bigger more enthusiastic crowds, won.

In truth, all of this talk about the ‘Far-Right’, the ‘Alt-Right’, or the ‘Racist-Right’ is complete nonsense. The millions of Americans supporting Trump haven’t suddenly all moved to the Far-Right!  Actually, it’s the political ‘Establishment’, of both parties who have shifted rather sharply to the Left.  Let’s face it, if you occupied what was considered as being the ideological center in 1965, and went to sleep for 50 years, and woke up in 2016, you’d now be accused of occupying the ideological “far right”.

And you didn’t have to budge one inch morally or ideologically to find yourself there. That whizzing sound you heard was the ideological center zooming over to the Cultural Marxist hardcore Left.  All that which was once considered to be mainstream, commonsense, logical and unquestionably moral in 1965, is now considered by our political, academic and media elites, to be bigoted, ignorant, hateful, xenophobic, racist, extremist or any number of other contrived mental abnormalities.

In other words, over the course of a pretty brief period of time, historically speaking, western culture been made to experience that which can only be described as being a polar-inversion regarding its entire moral framework.  What was once looked upon as being natural and beneficial to society, is now looked down upon as unnatural and harmful.  And what was once looked down upon as being unnatural and harmful to society, is now looked up to as being natural and beneficial to society.

Today, patriotism, Christian values, the sanctity of human life, the traditional family, motherhood, fatherhood and out national sovereignty are all now considered to be old fashioned negatives to be, at best, tolerated and at worst, outlawed.  Meanwhile it’s globalism, atheism, abortion, the single parent family, Androgyny, same-sex relationships and open borders immigration that are now all lauded as positive goals to be actively championed and tirelessly worked towards.

Calling Trump a racist isn’t really working.  Nor is calling him misogynist, working.  Nor a homophobe or an islamophobe.  Next I suspect we’ll be hearing from that fraudulent quack, Dr. Phil, about how Trump is a psychopath.  Let’s face it, that’s just how desperate the progressive left in this country has now become.   But what does work is the fact that Trump is not Hitlery.  Now that works!  And at the end of the day all that will be necessary to defeat Hitlery is for people to get out and vote.

And personally, I pay no attention to the polls, the naysayers, the racial hucksters, like Jackson, or the state-controlled media.  Because it becomes more obvious every day just how desperate they are to stop Trump, by any and all means necessary.  And I don’t care what label they place on me for voting for him.  On November 8th I will be voting for Mr. Trump, even if I am the only person in the country to do so.  Never take counsel of your fears.  I will not be dissuaded and neither should you.

And I guess what really scares me it the fact that what we are witnessing today is something that I personally view as a rather unique phenomenon. Never before in the course of human history, has an entire culture, race and/or civilization, been so willing, even eager, to choose to abandon its historical and moral foundation and decide to hand over its lands, social capital, cultural heritage and national identities to a competing alien culture – without so much as the weakest of skirmishes.

And you know, what’s even worse is the fact that there are many in the West who have been only too happy in allowing themselves to have been made to ‘evolve’ to the point where they now possess a mentality where they are able to justify, morally, and even glorify their own extinction using their own cultural beliefs as ultimate proof regarding the need for their demise.  My friends, we are witnessing nothing less than western civilization participating in its own death dance.  It’s frightening!


Hitlery 183

From watching the old girl over that last few months you’d think the current presidential contest was all over but the cryin’.  But that being said, this past week wasn’t one of the better ones for Hitlery Clinton.  And in what can only be described as being a desperate attempt to divert attention away from what has been a deluge of left-wing media outlets now calling for the closure of her corrupt foundation, Hitlery resorted to that old Democrat standby of calling supporters of Donald Trump nothing more than a bunch of racists who need a political leader who can keep them from fueling racial violence and hatred across the country.

Such is, apparently, the next phase of her pitch to become Commander-in-Chief: not that she is a trustworthy candidate, but that her opposition, candidate and voters alike, are racists who should make you fear for your safety.  Thursday’s shopworn accusations of racism on the part of Trump supporters came from a candidate whose political party went to war to preserve slavery; founded the Ku Klux Klan; passed Jim Crow Laws; is beholden to Planned Parenthood, which makes millions every year by aborting black babies; keeps poor black kids trapped in shoddy schools; and supports an amnesty agenda that will devastate the black worker.

And so it was then, that in her recent 2,800-plus-word missive, Hitlery set about to make three pernicious points.  And to what degree she was successful in that endeavor I will leave for others to determine.  But from my own rather unique point of view it would seem that she has accomplished little more than to make herself appear, to all except her most devoted followers, more than a little desperate.  Leftists like Hitlery almost always would rather go after their opponents personally, than to spend any amount of time talking about their positions on today’s important issues.  And here’s how Hitlery went about doing just that:

  1. THE RACE CARD: Donald Trump and his supporters are racists. And if you disagree you’re a racist, too.

In her speech this past Thursday, Hitlery warned the crowd about Trump: “From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia.”  She continued by saying, “ In just the past week, under the guise of “outreach” to African Americans, Trump has stood up in front of largely white audiences and described black communities in insulting and ignorant terms:  “Poverty. Rejection. Horrible education. No housing. No homes. No ownership. Crime at levels nobody has seen… Right now, you walk down the street, you get shot.” Those are his words.”  Yes, Trump’s words describing the result of decades of Democrat policies.

Hitlery went on to say, “Donald Trump misses so much. He doesn’t see the success of black leaders in every field…The vibrancy of black-owned businesses… Or the strength of the black church… He doesn’t see the excellence of historically black colleges and universities or the pride of black parents watching their children thrive… And he certainly doesn’t have any solutions to take on the reality of systemic racism and create more equity and opportunity in communities of color.  It takes a lot of nerve to ask people he’s ignored and mistreated for decades, “What do you have to lose?” The answer is everything!”  But the truth is blacks only have everything to gain!

Hitlery said, “Trump’s lack of knowledge or experience or solutions would be bad enough. But what he’s doing here is more sinister. Trump is reinforcing harmful stereotypes and offering a dog whistle to his most hateful supporters.”  Hitlery played the race card here, because that’s what Democrats have always done. They don’t need a legitimate reason.  But truth be told, it’s Hitlery — not Donald Trump — who’s been accused by Haitians, for years, of turning the tragic earthquake that rocked the tiny Caribbean country in 2010 into a lucrative venture for their closest allies.

And let’s not forget Hitlery’s own decades-long list of instances where she’s resorted to pandering black voters and has made numerous blatantly racist remarks.  And how it is that nearly every time she gets in front of black audience she is somehow able to acquire a ‘Negro dialect’, one that seems to be reserved for those very special occasions.  And what’s always amazed me is how blacks don’t seem to view this as being in any way the least bit insulting.  And while Hitlery seems to take great pride in having broken through the “glass ceiling,” let’s not forget that she does still live in a glass house.

  1. Trump supporters are roaming the streets committing hate crimes.

If you missed it or were simply bored to sleep, Hitlery came to a point in her speech where she blamed alleged random acts of violence on Trump’s presidential campaign.  Hitlery said, “Parents and teachers are already worried about what they’re calling the “Trump Effect.”  Bullying and harassment are on the rise in our schools, especially targeting students of color, Muslims, and immigrants.”  But what acts of violence that have taken place, and continue to take place, at Trump rallies and elsewhere are ALWAYS brought about by those who fear that the election of Mr. Trump will result in their gravy train being nudged off the tracks.

  1. Republican voters are so unruly that they regularly need leaders who will shame and curb their racism.

Finding new ways to insult the American voter, Hitlery asserted that, left unchecked by their betters in Washington D.C., Republicans will always lash out at ethnic minorities.  I’ll tell you what, the day that I view those in Washington D.C., regardless of party affiliation, as being my better, is the day that I will view life as being no longer worth living.  After all, it has always be the Democrat Party that has viewed minorities as being less than their equals and, dare I say, less than human.  And sadly, blacks are either incapable or unwilling to look past the blatantly revisionist history that the Democrat Party has managed to construct for itself.

Hitlery said, “This is a moment of reckoning for every Republican dismayed that the Party of Lincoln has become the Party of Trump. It’s a moment of reckoning for all of us who love our country and believe that America is better than this.  Twenty years ago, when Bob Dole accepted the Republican nomination, he pointed to the exits and told any racists in the Party to get out.  The week after 9/11, George W. Bush went to a mosque and declared for everyone to hear that Muslims “love America just as much as I do.”  However, the world has changed much in the last 15 years, and not necessarily for the better.

She went on to say, “In 2008, John McCain told his own supporters they were wrong about the man he was trying to defeat. Senator McCain made sure they knew – Barack Obama is an American citizen and “a decent person.  We need that kind of leadership again.”  But what Hitlery so conveniently leaves out of her idiotic little diatribe is the fact that the primary reason so many Americans were opposed to Barry becoming president had nothing to do with the color of his skin.  But it had everything to do with the obvious leftward slant to his positions on the important issues.  It’s Hitlery and the Democrats who view everything though the prism of race.

I believe that it was Charles Krauthammer who put it best when he said, “This is the old Democratic playbook, where you accuse your opponent of being racist, to use ad hominems. I mean, it is slightly over-the-top.”  But over-the-top or not, it’s the playbook that the Democrats will continue to employ if for no other reason than because it continues to work.  Because if a significant percentage of blacks were ever to actually come to their senses, I have no doubt that they would likely abandon the Democrat Party in droves.  So the Democrats insist upon portraying America as if we were back in the 1950s and black continue to believe it.

I think most reasonably intelligent people will pretty much agree that the only reason Donald Trump is being called a racist is because he doesn’t want to allow millions of Illegal aliens to swarm the American economic system during a period of time where national income continues to fall, the labor force participation rate is at a record low, and the financial system has reached a point in time where the value of our money equals near zero, harming the savings of retirees.  It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with his judgement regarding the character or abilities of anyone.  But according to Hitlery it can ONLY be because he’s a racist.



For decades, the Democrat Party has inflicted upon the once great cities of this country policies that have done little more than to turn many of those same cities into little more than cesspools of impoverishment.  Neighborhoods have been shattered and families are often housed, doctored, educated, and even fed by an army of bureaucrats. There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.  Such are the policies that Democrats would love nothing more than to force upon every American citizen, no matter where it is that they may live.  There would be no escape, no safe haven and no place to hide.

What I’ve listed below are but a few of the policies that demonstrate just how it is that the Democrat Party has gone about its mission to systematically, and very purposefully, destroy America’s inner cities.  Policies that have done nothing more than to virtually guarantee that those trapped within such cities are put on the road to ruin on every level.  And all while taking the voters who live in these cities for granted.  And sadly, the gullible who are on the receiving end of these nightmarish polices are either too ignorant, too foolish, or simply too willing to go along with them, to take it upon themselves to try to change their toxic environment.

The first of those policies to emerge out of the gate is that unmitigated disaster that we know as Obamacare.  The sad truth is that middle class Americans and African-Americans in the inner cities in this country aren’t benefiting from ObamaCare when compared to other groups.  According to an extensive 65-page report by The Urban Institute, obtaining coverage has been much harder for black Americans than it has been for Hispanics and American Indians.  And in February, black business owners railed against a decision by Barry’s administration to funnel millions in Obamacare subsidies to illegal immigrants.

Next comes Barry’s plan for executive amnesty.  And what we see here is how hardworking black Americans in America’s inner cities are being crushed under the weight of an illegal alien workforce, that has been rapidly expanding as a direct result of the policies of Barry “Almighty”.  Peter Kirsanow, an official with the U.S. Civil Rights Commission wrote to Barry and the Congressional Black Caucus in 2013.  It was at that time that he said, “Granting work authorization to millions of illegal immigrants will devastate the black community, which is already struggling in the wake of the recession that began in 2007 and the subsequent years of malaise.”

Mr. Kirsanow also argued that illegal immigration has severely depressed the labor force participation rate of low-skilled blacks.  He said, “Illegal immigration has a disparate impact on African-American men, because these men are disproportionately represented in the low-skilled labor force.”   A recent survey by the Black Alliance for Educational Options (BAEO) shows a majority of black voters in several states strongly support school choice, and many favor the option to send their children to public charter schools.  And yet they vote for those candidates who call themselves ‘pro-choice’ except when it comes to ‘school choice.’

BAEO surveyed 2,400 black voters from inner cities Alabama, Louisiana, New Jersey, and Tennessee.  The poll was conducted in August by JMC Analytics and Polling.  More than two-thirds of the black voters surveyed in Louisiana, New Jersey, and Tennessee support pubic charter schools over traditional pubic schools.  And in August, Gallup released its 46th annual PDK/Gallup Poll of the Public’s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools which showed that six in ten Americans – black, Hispanic, and, white adults – favor charter schools and support a parent’s right to choose their child’s education.  And yet Democrats continue to oppose it.

Despite the overwhelming evidence that vouchers have helped raise the quality of stagnant school systems for some the poorest American children trapped in shoddy schools, there’s no shortage of Democrats fighting against their funding.  Democrats consistently place the demands of their union supporters far above the desires of their constituents.  And in the end it’s black voters themselves who allow this trend to continue.  If black parents were truly all that interested in doing all they can to ensure their children get the best education as possible, they would be abandoning the Democrat Party in what would be record number.  But they aren’t.

Then we move onto the quest for stricter gun control laws.  It’s a fact that America’s most crime-ridden cities are run almost exclusively by Democrat mayors. In 2015, the inner cities of Oakland, Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, Philadelphia — also known as “Killadelphia,” — Atlanta and other Democratic Party monopolies are routinely plagued with violent criminality.  For decades Democrats have stopped at nothing to take away and restrict the Constitutional right of every law abiding citizen living in these unsafe communities to carry a firearm as a means to protect themselves and their families.

Nearly 300 years before racist Democrats enacted Jim Crow Laws that helped disarm blacks in the south, Chief Justice Roger Taney argued in his opinion in Dred Scott v. Sanford that blacks could not be granted citizenship because “[I]t would give them the full liberty … to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”  And while Democrats demonize it today, it was the NRA who stood up to defend blacks when Democrats robbed, murdered, and lynched them in the 1950s and 60s.  Today, it’s Democrats — from Hitlery to Barry — still working to disarm blacks who are being buried by gang violence in Democrat Party monopolies all across America.

Then comes the minimum wage myth.  A myriad of studies have shown that higher labor costs reduce employment, especially for younger or less educated workers employed at local fast food restaurants and grocery stores.  A study from labor economists William Even of Miami University in Ohio and David Macpherson of Trinity University in Texas proves how young black men are being hurt the most by the very minimum wage hikes being pushed by Democrat Party leaders in states across the U.S.  About 18,500 black young adults in the 21 states affected by the federal minimum wage increases passed in 2007 lost their jobs.

And it was also that aforementioned study which said, “Among black males in this group, each 10% increase in the minimum wage has decreased employment by 6.5%,” the study said.  The study examined the level of damage based on a $10.10 minimum wage increase.  And yet Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery Clinton stands by her promise to raise the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, should she actually win in November.  God forbid!  Meanwhile, it’s Mr. Trump who wants to raise wages across the board another way, and dare I say a better way.  That being, of course, by creating an environment that will dramatically increase job creation.

And then we have the Democrat commitment to abortion.  While pregnant-aged black women represent roughly five percent of the total U.S. population, they accounted for 35 percent of the abortions in 2010.  That’s because Planned Parenthood abortion facilities intentionally inhabit America’s inner cities and are “located within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods.”  And yet, we have those blacks in Congress as well as those in the entertainment industry and the state-controlled media, who continue to advocate for an organization that is responsible for the killing of more blacks than is the KKK.

And then we have Barry’s out of control Environmental Protection Agency enacting all manner of new regulations.  Barry’s Clean Power Plan will hurt millions of low and middle class Americans in inner cities already struggling to pay their bills in this sagging economy. It was Mr. Harry Alford, the president and CEO National Black Chamber of Commerce, who said in testimony before Congress last year, “These communities already suffer from higher unemployment and poverty rates compared to the rest of the country, yet the EPA’s regressive energy tax threatens to push minorities and low-income Americans even further into poverty.”

Barry’s Clean Power Plan, Mr. Alford argued, may cut greenhouse emissions it will also raise poverty by 23 percent among blacks and 26 percent among Hispanics and will raise the average American’s energy costs by more than 15 percent by 2035.  Mr. Alford went on to argue, “Most importantly, the loss of development and economic expansion would affect many of the blue-collar jobs that power our low-income and minority communities.”  But all seems to matter little to Barry as his lawyers continue fighting in court to make sure that his economy killing Clean Power Plan is eventually enacted.  And for what?

And what we have taking place in cities like Detroit, Baltimore, Ferguson, Watts, Memphis, Flint, and South Chicago, to name just a few, is little more than Democrat Party sanctioned killing.  And all with unilaterally unopposed rule by Progressive Democrats for over 50 years. Our cities aren’t simply dying, most are already dead but their citizens are too addled, deluded, addicted or ignorant to recognize that fact.   And it all started with the Great Society’s “War on Poverty” that made black women dependent on the state.  Ever since, single-mother families have skyrocketed.  It should have been called, the War on the Poor.

And I have also listed here a short history of the Democrat Party in respect to civil rights and minorities and the wreckage of Progressivism.  You’ll notice, and rather quickly I assume, that reality differs quite significantly from the revisionist account of historical events perpetrated by Democrats.

Democrats versus Republicans:

13th Amendment [Abolish Slavery]

GOP: 100% Support

DEM: 77% Against

14th Amendment [Citizenship and Equal Rights under the law]

GOP: 94% Support

DEM: 100% Against

15th Amendment [Right to Vote]

GOP: 100% Support

DEM: 100% Against

Democrat controlled cities where murder rates are on the rise (2011-2015):

Baltimore +37% [Democrat Mayor for the last 49 years]

Chicago + 64% [Democrat Mayor for the last 85 years] (50% increase in murders this year alone)

DC + 30% [Democrat Mayor for the last 41 years]

Milwaukee + 66% [Democrat Mayor for the last 108 years]

Newark + 10.6% [Democrat Mayor for the last 109 years]

St. Louis + 34% [Democrat Mayor for the last 67 years]

The Democrats are the party that took the lands from the Indians and put them on reservations. The Democrats are the party of the Ku Klux Klan. The Democrats are the party that blocked women’s suffrage.  The Democrats are the party of no immigration restrictions.  And the Democrats are the party “for” sterilization.  Yet their claim to fame is that they’re the party of the good guys, the little guys, the minorities, and, of course, women. If something just doesn’t work time after time, over and over, what does it tell you? Should you keep going with it?  Should you do it again?  If this doesn’t show the Democrat narrative, then I don’t know what does.

And yet none of what I have tried to point out here will likely make one iota of difference to the 95 percent of blacks who insist upon voting for Democrats time after time after time, and who will, undoubtedly, vote for the one person who means to do them the most harm, Hitlery Clinton.  Never have I seen a group of people more determined in their efforts to ensure that their station in life never improves.  It’s all so bizarre.   Much talk is always made about how the Republicans don’t work hard enough at reaching out to blacks, and yet if I was a black man in America I think I’d be able to figure out for myself that the Democrat Party is not where I belong.


Trump 21

Being a rather reluctant passenger on that which has come to be referred as being the “Trump Train” to begin with, I now find myself somewhat torn over that decision because of Mr. Trump’s recent comments regarding the “softening” of his position on illegal immigration.  Now I know there will be those who will tell me that I shouldn’t be at all surprised, and to some degree, I must admit, they’re right.  But having said that, I’m not really sure what annoys me more, Trump’s apparent shift in position, or the fact that in doing so he has needlessly provided the NeverTrumper crowd with some level of ammunition.

All of this stems from what would at least appear to be somewhat of a major shift in Trump’s immigration policy, which was revealed during a Fox News interview which aired Wednesday night and that seemed to indicate that Trump might now be open to a pathway to legalization for certain illegal immigrants.  Speaking to Sean Hannity, Trump reiterated his opposition to “amnesty” but seemed to advocate for letting ‘law-abiding illegal immigrants’ who have been in the country for a long time pay a fine so they can remain in the country.  How can one be in this country illegally and yet be considered as law-abiding?

“No citizenship,” Trump said.  And he then went on to say, “Let me go a step further — they’ll pay back-taxes, they have to pay taxes, there’s no amnesty, as such, there’s no amnesty, but we work with them.”  Ok, so I’m thinking that he’s going to need to explain a little more exactly what he means when he says we will “work with them.”  Throughout the campaign, Trump staked out what was seen as being a pretty tough position on the issue of illegal immigration.  He has vowed to build a wall along the Mexico border and enforce current immigration laws on the books as a way to decrease illegal immigration.

Trump said illegal immigrants who have committed crimes should be deported.  He said, “Now, everybody agrees we get the bad ones out.”  And he went on to say, “But when I go through and I meet thousands and thousands of people on this subject, and I’ve had very strong people come up to me, really great, great people come up to me, and they’ve said, ‘Mr. Trump, I love you, but to take a person who’s been here for 15 or 20 years and throw them and their family out, it’s so tough, Mr. Trump,’ I have it all the time! It’s a very, very hard thing.”  Regardless of how tough it is, or how hard it is, those here illegally are breaking our laws!

Aides to two of Trump’s primary opponents, who were attacked for being weak on illegal immigration, argued Wednesday that Trump was now adopting their candidate’s position.  A former Jeb Bush spokesman, Tim Miller, said on Wednesday, “This is basically Jeb’s position.”   And John Weaver, who ran Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s campaign tweeted, “Who needs a policy shop when they can just flip and take @JohnKasich positions?”   There has been much interest in Trump’s stance on what to do with the more than 11 million illegal immigrants already in the country since Trump said there could be a “softening” in his position.

And of course it took virtually no time at all for Hitlery’s campaign to react, and negatively so, to Trump’s immigration comments by saying that they simply don’t believe him. On Sunday, Hitlery’s campaign chairman John Podesta said they believe Trump’s “immigration plan remains the same as it’s always been: tear apart families and deport 16 million people from the United States.”  And I suppose such comments should be expected.  That said, I have very little sympathy for law breakers, and the fact that those in this country illegally, are breaking the law every single day that tey are in this country.

And even though Trump says he isn’t talking about amnesty, I think we can all agree that that’s exactly what he is talking about.  So the calls have already begun about how he has sold out his supporters.  This new amnesty position is bad in a few ways.  To the 90 million unemployed Americans, (black, white, and legal Latino), Trump is saying, “sorry, the illegals are keeping their jobs. And by the way, they are legal now, ha, ha”.  Trump cannot outbid the Democrats. If he offers amnesty, they offer citizenship. If he offers citizenship, the Democrats offer citizenship and a mule. But I fear that Trump will not be able to win this way.

So why don’t I want illegals to be able to stay once Trump’s wall has been built?  It’s pretty simple really: 1) They are taking jobs away from US citizens.  2) They are holding wages down.  3) They disproportionately draw on welfare and other government programs.  4) And as long as they are here the Democrats will use them as a wedge issue to make them citizens with voting privileges.  Feel free to add your own reasons not to keep them here!  And yes, I suppose that one could very easily make the argument that Trump is now doing exactly what he accuses Hitlery of doing, and that is pandering for votes.

We’re told that the polls have been saying for months now that his stance on deporting families was hurting him with Republicans and crossover Democrats. Most Republicans are not the stereotype that Democrats portray them as being. The issue polled over and over showing the majority of Republicans were more concerned with border security and crime than rounding up families, especially if it was going to take some new department to do it and it probably would have.  Now, or so we are told, his position is exactly where the majority of both Republicans and middle class working Democrats are.

And yes, this “softening” of his position is likely to tick off some of the very far right, but again many of those guys were skeptical about growing the government or giving them the new powers it would take. Now while l may not be in favor of growing the police state to get rid of families who may not be bothering anyone, at the same time I don’t like the idea of creating 11 Million brand new Democrat voters.  That would be my main reason for booting them all out of our country.  They came here illegally, hence that have no reason to be here no matter how long ago they managed to get away with it.  And I thought Mr. Trump understood that.

But still, at the end of the day, my disappointment in this sudden shift notwithstanding, after taking everything into consideration, I’m not yet to the point where I’m ready to abandon Trump.  That being said, should his position on these illegal immigrants become any “softer” I may be left with very little choice but to reconsider my decision to support Mr. Trump.  Those who made the conscious decision to first come here, and then to remain here, illegally should have virtually no pathway to citizenship.  NONE, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH, NADDA.  And if Mr. Trump comes to consider that as a viable option, then he will surely have lost a supporter.


Hitlery 181

I find myself wondering if those who so proudly call themselves ‘Democrats’ will ever wake up to the realization that today’s Democrat Party is not their Daddy’s Democrat Party.  That it has been made to morph into what their Daddy might very well have called, the Communist Party.  Now they can take that however they wish, but unfortunately it’s the truth!  And Democrats can either continue to stick their heads in the sand or they can finally come to the understanding that their candidate is a devout leftist who is out for no one but herself.

And how is it that I can make such a claim?  Well really, it’s quite simple.  Because while Hitlery may be busy pitching her leftist tripe to working class voters, telling them that she stands for them, it’s at the very same time that her campaign is increasingly being funded by the ultra-wealthy of America, and beyond.  According to the Washington Post, not exactly a bastion of conservatism, Hitlery has spent the last few weeks attending fundraisers that can cost upwards of $50,000 per person to attend.  Little chance there of running into any riff-raff.

And it was the very next day after Hitlery attended an exclusive fundraiser at the home of some billionaire, which featured singer Aretha Franklin and cost $25,000 a head, that she pitched to a crowd of working class voters: “There is too much inequality, too little upward mobility. It is just too hard to get ahead today.”  And during a major economic speech earlier this month in the blue-collar community of Warren, Michigan, Hitlery pledged that if elected, “I will have your back every single day that I serve.”  Anyone who believes that is beyond ignorant.

But even that paled in comparison to what she did after the speech.  Because on the evening of her speech, donors paid $50,000 apiece to mingle with the candidate at the Chicago Club, one of the city’s most exclusive social gathering places.  And it was Hitlery’s running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine, who dutifully did his part by appearing at another fundraiser the very same day at a Roman-style trattoria in a boutique Manhattan hotel, where admission to that gathering carried a $50,000 price tag as well.  Again, there was little chance of running into any of the unwashed masses.

And it was also according to the Post that Hitlery and her rather strange running mate have held 50 fundraisers so far this month, many of them focused on high-end donors.  Hitlery has been attacked by both the left and the right for her apparent willingness to cozy up to big money donors and claims that it leads to special access, a claim bolstered with reports that more than half the visitors to Hitlery while she headed up the State Department had all made rather sizable ‘donations’ to the Clinton Foundation/Political Slush Fund.  She is allowed to ignore such claims.

Look, the bottom line here is that if you are blue collar worker, who still has a job, and you remain stupid enough to vote for Hitlery, then the simple fact is that you are essentially doing little more than to cut your own throat.  Because the sad truth is Hitlery cares zip-point-shit for every day working class people.  But I guess if you insist upon carrying out that which has become for you the old family tradition of voting Democrat, then by all means, knock yourself out.  Far be it from me to try and talk any sense into anyone who views Hitlery as being worthy of their vote.

And it’s become pretty common knowledge that when cameras are off this woman is nothing if not absolutely horrid.  Hitlery is a vile and nasty person who swears like a sailor (no offense to my fellow sailors) at anyone she considers as being beneath her.  Which is just about everybody.  If you bother to do a little research on Hitlery it’s in pretty short order that you’ll come to the conclusion that she’s a real witch.  And frankly, when it comes to possessing the right temperament to be president I’ll take Donald Trump any day.  I want Hitlery’s finger nowhere near the ‘Nuke Button!’

And if you’re interested in finding the kind of people the Clintons really are, pick yourself up a copy of “The Residence”, a book of interviews with White House staff on how all the first families treated staff going back to the Kennedys.  Of the first families covered, the Clintons were loathed by the staff, they were rude, crude and socially unacceptable.  That said, it’s unfortunate that 95% of black Americans will still vote for her!  And it’s sad that a pack of smokes, $20, or a fifth of whiskey that can still buy votes in America.  And it’s sadder that they can come so cheaply.


Hitlery 180

Well apparently, if you are our current Democrat candidate for president, you’re allowed to do nothing more than to attend fundraisers and make nonsensical speeches.  And Hitlery will give another one of those speeches, one in which she plans to attack the “alt-right”, aka the vast right wing conspiracy, and is currently scheduled to take place this Thursday in Reno, Nevada.  And it was in a statement to those same reporters whom she has sought to avoid for over 260 days that Hitlery’s campaign promised that she would “deliver a speech to address Donald Trump and his advisers’ embrace of the disturbing ‘alt-right’ political philosophy.”

According to a statement released by Hitlery’s campaign, the campaign wrote: “This ‘alt-right’ brand is embracing extremism and presenting a divisive and dystopian view of America which should concern all Americans, regardless of party.”  So how is it that we on the right are to be considered as being the extremists?  Especially when it is those one the left who are busy advocating for men to be able to use female restrooms or that women be entitled to have an abortion right to the time of delivery or welcoming into this country all manner of illegal immigrant?  Are those not extreme positions?  And are they not ALL Democrat positions?

Also according to the statement released by her campaign Hitlery will attempt to alienate and exclude “alt-right” groups of Trump supporters as being un-American and white nationalist racists.  Her campaign suggested that Trump’s political views and temperament are “dangerous” for the country’s future.  So once again it becomes all about slandering her opponent and his supporters rather than her being able to talk about anything of substance that she has managed to accomplish in her long and rather storied career in ‘public service.’  That’s only because she’s accomplished NOTHING!  And if anyone is dangerous to the future of America, it’s Hitlery!

And this statement from her campaign then went onto say, “Clinton will contrast Donald Trump’s divisive views and dangerous temperament with her vision of an America that is stronger together and where everyone has a role to play in the future.”  I always find it rather ironic how it is that our near useless state-controlled media never has any trouble whatsoever in allowing someone as divisive, and mentally unstable, as is Hiterly to continually accuse her opponent of behaving in the manner which we typically see coming from her.  Such is one of the reasons that so very few of us any longer pay attention to the media.

Because let’s face it, this entire leftist entourage, comprised of our state-controlled media, the Democrat Party, Hollywood as well as the vast majority of Academia, that continues to surround Hitlery is so very accommodating, as well as complicit, when it comes to her blatant deceptions to the American people.  They are also complicit in Hitlery’s continual, daily lies no matter how obvious or egregious they may be.  As far as I’m concerned, there is absolutely nothing worse than someone who lies, especially for something as trivial as personal gain.  Except, perhaps, those who take an active role in supporting those lies or who provide cover for the liar.

Who knows, in making this speech Hitlery may just be making a huge mistake, which is a nice thought.  That said, there is little doubt that those in our state-controlled media will heap all manner of praise upon it, and her for making it, and will then go on to attack Trump 24/7 in the days following it.  But then, those of us in the “alt-right” have always been marginalized to one degree or another by those in the media.  Giving it more attention and fantastic opportunities to “troll” Hitlery will only help it. They say any publicity is good publicity, and enough people doubt the Hitlery media narrative that this will only help us race realists make inroads.

Hitlery’s campaign makes reference to what it calls the divisive and dystopian view of the “alt-right”.  But who is it that really possesses such a view?  I mean, whose view is it that: (1) Transgenders should use the same bathrooms as little girls, or (2) sees as appropriate parading the Orlando terrorist’s father front and center in her rally, or (3) calling 50% of Americans, or more, extremists is anything but divisive, or (4) lying repeatedly to the American people is in itself, divisive and dystopian, or (5) accepting money while secretary of state was nothing short of criminal, or finally (6) selling uranium to the Russian mob may actually bring about the final dystopian fantasy.

Hitlery’s speech may, at least, turn out to be nothing if not amusing, not that I’ll be able to actually watch it.  Her voice is reminiscent of fingernails going across a chalkboard.  And she might actually end up alienating the remainder of “fly-over country” and with just one speech.  She will try to paint Mr. Trump as “scary”, yet I think she started that angle too soon as it’s already losing its impact.  But the people have grown very tired of Washington corruption and want to throw all of the corrupt bums out.  Thus, Trump is the people’s peaceful revolution candidate.  And Hitlery with her Clinton Foundation pay-for-favors baggage is the zombie candidate.

Whatever the reality is, and you won’t see it on the tube, the media has become nothing more than a propaganda/smear machine as well as the left wing’s indoctrination tool.  Every commercial, show, movie is simply the illusion that they wish to implant in the young and the naive.  It used to be that commercials during large sporting events were anticipated and worth waiting for.  The necessity to contrive the Leftist message completely replaces creativity, with mediocre petty sermonizing, lies, and lack of originality.  Instead of high tech witty one of a kind commercial we get the same old tired communist non-sense.

This election the American people, or at least a majority of them, are going to have to decide how it is that they wish to move forward from here.  Do we allow Washington to corrupt the entire country, or do we the American people finally flex our muscles by making very clear to the elites that we are sick and tired and we’re not going to take it anymore.  Hitlery will do her best to frame those of us on the right as being the extremists in this little contest and she will try to use our support of Mr. Trump against us.  And the state-controlled media will do all within its power to assist her.  We must be able to see through the nonsense!


Trump 12

In watching all that has been going on during this crazy election season, if there is one thing that I think most sane people can come to an agreement on, it’s the fact that those voters who support Hitlery are, to a person, morons.  Let’s face it, Hitlery has more criminal investigations to her name than does an “aspiring young rapper trying to turn his life around” and who is also “a goot boy who ain’t never done nuffin’ wrong.”  We expect nothing more from liberals except for them to support Hitlery.  It’s what they do.  So if this country is going to be rescued it’s going to be left to the rest of us to man up and do what needs to done to salvage what’s left of it.

As we have progressed over the course of the last twelve months it would appear that something pretty remarkable has taken place.  That being, of course, the fact we now have a first time politician who has managed to become the candidate for president from a major party.  But something else, just as remarkable has also taken place.  That we have a lot of voters who call themselves conservatives and/or Republicans who have taken it upon themselves to trash that candidate, and have even come up with a name for themselves, NeverTrump.  And I hope that because of the position they have taken, their reputations will be forever greatly diminished.

I’ve seen many conservatives on social media who seem to take great pleasure in trashing Mr. Trump. The trashing never consists of actual proof of any wrong doing, only of vague accusations and innuendo, regarding things that Mr. Trump has supposedly said or done.  We’re told that he is a racist, a bigot, and of course, above all else, a sexist.  Oh, and I left out the fact that he’s the most narcissistic person you’ll ever see.  The most narcissistic?  Really?  What about the current boob in the Oval Office?  You know, the guy with the power to heal the seas when in fact he couldn’t quiet Milwaukee and who has set race relations back 100 years.

Whenever asked to provide that which could be called verifiable proof of what appears to be their list charges against Trump, their typical response always has them declaring that they have no actual proof.  Their problem with Trump is somehow based on some gut feeling they have and which the rest of us are expected to put our faith in.  And in typical holier-than-thou fashion those to whom they refer to as being ‘good people’ would never possibly chose to support Trump.  Apparently because of all the supposed hatred they accuse Mr. Trump of having spewed.  I’ve listened to plenty of Trump speeches and I just don’t see it.

What strikes me as being more than just a little frustrating is that when I ask folks what it is that they so dislike about Trump the thing they usually come up with is that a border wall with Mexico just won’t work.  Personally, I’ve never understood why people say a border wall won’t work.  Maybe it won’t stop 100% of illegals but commonsense tells us it will work better than an open desert or a single strand of rusted out barbed wire. Walls have worked well at prisons and jails for a millennia.  And to see just how well a wall does work one needs to look no further than Israel to find a wall that has achieved exactly what it was designed to achieve.

Here’s the deal, I am well aware of the fact that many people are tired of the Republicans and Democrats with most see them as one party. And if Jeb Bush or John Kasich had won the nomination, I’m must admit I’m not sure what I would have done. The Establishment prefers the more limp-wristed, gutless wimps who are only too eager to serve up to the Democrats. But Trump isn’t an Establishment type. That’s why all the GOP Establishment types are ALL supporting Hitlery. You heard that right. They are voting for Hitlery. Because Hitlery is a continuation of their cushy existence as they continue to ride America right into the ground.

Ok, so Trump may not be a bona fide conservative but I haven’t heard him say anything to the contrary. And at this point I really don’t care if he goes to church or is pro-choice on abortion or pro gay marriage.  Because, to be honest, those issues are the least of America’s problems in 2016 and can be haggled about AFTER the election. But he is an American and says he will put America first and I believe him. After 16 years of a government-sanctioned invasion by every Third Worlder who wanted to live in the Great Satan, I am now prepared to give Trump’s nationalism the benefit of the doubt.  After all, we know what we will get with Hitlery, a disaster.

The 800 pound gorilla in the room that our esteemed #NeverTrump types seem so willing to ignore is that WE KNOW, beyond a shadow of a doubt, what Hitlery Clinton would do to America if elected. Trump has made a lot of promises and none seem to be hateful, misogynistic, or racist.  What they appear to be, is commonsense.  Border wall, check. Putting America first, check.  Halting TPP, check.  Making our “allies” pay their share for our military protection, check.  Killing ISIS, a sort of check as I prefer ISIS be eliminated by those whom they are killing and not US soldiers. None of what Trump has to say appears to me to be the least bit extreme.

Priority one as we head into this all important, even crucial, election should be, needs to be, the preventing, at all costs, of Hitlery Clinton from becoming the 45th president of the United States.  The time has now come for us to either shit or get off    the pot.  So if you truly do feel that Hitlery is the better option then, by all means either vote for her, stay home, or vote third party.  But if you’re like me, someone willing to take a chance on Trump, then make sure you, and as many of your friends as you can muster up, get out and vote for him.  Personally, I’m willing to risk allowing the other side the opportunity to come back and tell me, “I told you so.”

We have only two viable choices for president in this critical election, the others running are only doing so in an effort to be spoilers.  So we MUST pick the better of the two, it’s just that simple.  My mission is to stop Hitlery. She is bad for America and she is bad for our children. These ridiculous NeverTrumpers need to get on board the Trump train, and now.  A no vote, or some nonsensical protest vote for anyone other than Trump, is a vote for Hitlery.  And as I have said before, you go into an election with the candidate, or candidates, that you have, not with the ones you wish you had or the ones you feel you should have.  TRUMP 2016!!


Hitlery 179

I think there are times when most of us who have come to support Mr. Trump wish that he would maybe spend just a bit less time in front of reporters.  But then, I suppose, if he was to do that he wouldn’t be Trump.  And you have to give him credit, he’s not afraid to answer the tough questions.  And he said lots (and lots) of things during his hour-long town hall with Fox News’s Sean Hannity on Wednesday night.  One thing, however, did kind of stand out.  It was something he said, in talking about Hitlery.  It was when he said, “She is so protected.  They are so protecting her.  She hasn’t had a news conference in, like, 250 days.”

And so I starting thinking, has it really been that long since Hitlery has actually talked to the press?  Now I knew it had been quite a while since the old girl had ventured out in front of reporters, at least in a venue that wasn’t pretty heavily staged and biased in her favor, because I’ve been watching various news shows where there have been the subject of conversation.  But I guess I just hadn’t realized how long it really had been.  It’s now been almost 258 days!  It’s beyond ridiculous that one of the two people who will be elected president in 80 or so days continues to refuse to engage with the press in any meaningful way.

But still, there are those supporters of hers who will say, and very proudly so, that the fact she hasn’t done any press conferences is just not that big of a deal because what she has done is to so several sit-down type of interviews! And oh by the way, they’ll say, she has done something that was called a “press conference”, albeit with a moderator moderating the questions.  Now from my point of view, and not just because I’m a ‘NeverHitlery’ kind of guy, that’s simply not good enough.   Especially not when you are running to be president of the United States and despite the fact that your last name just happens to be Clinton.

One of the most important things, when someone is offering themselves up to represent all of us, is that we get the best sense we can about how that person thinks on his or her feet and how they deal with unwanted or adversarial types questions. Those two traits are big parts of doing the job of president in the modern world.  There’s nothing like a press conference to put a candidate for president through their paces.  If you don’t believe me, remember how badly Hitlery has bungled her many attempts at trying to put her private email server controversy behind her.  Things haven’t exactly gone all that well.

Hitlery’s struggles with the press conference format are a major part of why she hasn’t done one in so long.  She, simply put, really sucks at them, sucks bad.  So why do something that you know that you’re not very good at unless you fell you absolutely have to?   If campaigns are about downplaying your weaknesses while putting your strengths front and center, Hitlery’s avoidance of press conferences is “Campaigning 101.”  And barring anything but her taking some severe hit in the polls, I very much doubt that we will be seeing her availing herself to the media anytime soon,  regardless of the fact that they alway treat her with kid gloves.

Now I do think that on any given day Trump does tend to dominate the news coverage, if for no other reason than he’s not afraid to face reporters.  So one tends to not notice Hitlery’s unwillingness to face unscripted, unmoderated questions from reporters unless one goes looking.  And let’s face it, those in the state-controlled media would much rather blow out of proportion something that Trump has said than to spend time talking about anything substantive that relates to Hitlery.  So in an effort to put this all into perspective, think of it this way, the last time Hitlery held a press conference was Dec. 5, 2015.  And that was before:

  1. A single state had cast a vote in either a presidential primary or caucus
  2. Major terrorist attacks in Nice, Brussels and Orlando
  3. FBI Director James Comey issued his scathing report on Hitlery’s email practices while at the State Department
  4. The Bernie Sanders phenomenon
  5. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was run out of the Democrat National Committee in the wake of a massive email hack attack

Another way you can look at it is that the temperature in Washington on Dec. 5, 2015, was 44 degrees.  Today it got up to 85.  Or, a woman who conceived on Dec. 5, 2015, would be 8½ months pregnant today.  Also, on December 5, 2015, the Golden State Warriors were NBA champs.   So you get the idea.  It’s been a long time, a long time.  Now, if you can believe any of the recent polls Hitlery would at least seem to be the favorite to become the 45th president.  So the fact that she continues to avoid questions from the press is simply unacceptable given the office that she is seeking and the stakes involved in this election.

But look, Hitlery has any number of reasons for avoiding a press conference, and to do so like the plague.  She always looks rehearsed and her voice is worse than fingernails across a chalkboard, and she never really looks all that well.  I can’t help but feel that they are hiding her ill health and her inability to connect with people that isn’t robotic and rehearsed.  Besides, the state-controlled media never really holds her, or anyone on her staff or her organization, accountable so why hold a press conference.  Real unbiased reporting has long since died anyway. Thank God commonsense is still alive, albeit to a somewhat lesser degree than it once was.

And ya know, even those reporting on the fact that she hasn’t done a press conference in over 250 days have had no problem with giving her a pass on it.  Many even treat it as being nothing more than a joke.  But you can bet your bottom dollar that if it were Trump who was busying himself first running and then hiding from the press, the media would be going after him full tilt, and it would be regardless of whether he was ahead or behind in the polls.  But since it’s Hitlery, who most in the media will be voting for, it’s seen as being no big deal that she’s behaving as little more than a recluse from the American people.


Hillary Clinton Addresses Planned Parenthood Action Fund

Apparently this past Wednesday, while on a campaign swing through Cleveland, Ohio, Hilery told those gathered at a campaign event, “Donald Trump doesn’t need a tax cut. I don’t need a tax cut.”  She then went on to say, “It’s time for the wealthiest Americans, whoever you are, as well as corporations and Wall Street to pay your fair share in taxes. You have been successful in this country because of everything this country represents.”   However, Hitlery’s suggestion that people owe their success to someone other than themselves is not exactly original.

Because as you may, or may not, recall it was our ‘Dear Beloved Leader, Barry “Almighty”, who said something very similar to that just four years ago, during his re-election campaign.  It was to a group gathered at some campaign rally in Roanoke, Virginia back in July 2012 that Barry said, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”  Barry made the claim that successful people got help along the way, maybe from a teacher, or from the “American system,” with its road, bridges and inventions such as the Internet.

However, Barry had copied the line as well, from Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren.  You see, when she was running for a seat in the U.S. Senate in September 2011, Warren told her supporters, “There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody!”  She said, “You built a factory out there — good for you! But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. Your hired workers the rest of us paid to educate.  You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for.”

And old Pocahontas then went on to say, “You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did.”  And she added, “Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea—God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”  But who is this scumbag to dictate to me how large of a hunk of MY profits I need to “pay forward?”

It was also to this very same group, there in Cleveland, that Hitlery went on to say that as president she would end tax breaks for companies that outsource jobs; reward those who “invest in their employees”; and “slap an exit tax” on corporations that move their headquarters overseas.  She said, “The super-wealthy, corporations, Wall Street, they’re going to have to invest in education, in skills training, in infrastructure, because we have to grow this economy. We do need to have the resources to do that.”  Just how does she intend to GROW the economy?

But she was far from done.  Because she also said, “And I’ve laid out what I want to do and how I would do it; closing the loopholes, creating a fairer tax system. But I’ve made very clear, I’m the only candidate who ran in either of the Democratic or the Republican primary who said from the very beginning, I will not raise taxes on the middle class. The middle class has to catch up to they were before the great recession.”  Now I seem to recall seeing a video that showed Hitlery declaring, and pretty enthusiastically, that she does intend to raise taxes on the middle class.

So let me see if I have this right.  Hitlery thinks Barry has done such an excellent job that she promises more of the same.  Thanks to Barry’s out of control spending he has now effectively doubled what our debt was when he first strutted into the Oval Office.  And we continue to be warned by the experts to either reduce our spending or risk the worst depression the world has ever known.  When it’s all said and done and the money runs out, or is made valueless, we baby boomers who are unable to work, will likely be in long welfare lines waiting for crumbs.

People like Hitlery, and Barry as well, have absolutely no concept whatsoever of what it takes to build a business, to employ people and to make sure they get paid, or to produce goods or services other want to purchase. They are nothing of not completely clueless because they have never done, or produced, anything of value.  Let’s face it, if all your money has always come from grants or from government employment of one kind or another, you don’t understand the use of money nor do you understand what it takes to generate it.  It’s easy to spend other people’s money.

Yet these people who never created anything but massive debt, and who have benefited from people who do know how to build and create value, insist upon telling the rest of us how to run our lives. They further insult and destroy by claiming that self-sacrifice and hard work plays no part in one’s ability to achieve success.  Meanwhile, it’s they themselves who are nothing but leeches, thieves, or even parasites, taking from others and passing it along, and simply have no basis for economic knowledge except as it relates to their own personal wealth and power.

They are frauds, traitors and simply despicable people. And there’s ample reason to believe that it might even go deeper than that.  Hitlery complains about unfairness and the rich when it’s the left that has been running the country into the ground!  She offers the same solutions we’ve been trying for nearly eight years and that have resulted in near ZERO growth, a reduced middle class, more poor, more on food stamps, welfare, disability, the lowest labor participation rate since Carter, a massive debt, and a massive amount of new regulations.

Liberalism is all about the killing of dreams, limiting choices and increasing what is already a widespread reliance on government handouts!  And if anyone is truly paying attention here there is no one in their right mind who would vote for Hitlery or any other Democrat.  There is an old adage that says, “Even a nut will run out of a burning building.”  It’s just too bad that the same can be said when it comes to the fact that our country is being made to collapse around us and yet not enough people seem to be able to recognize that fact, or who has brought about that collapse.


Hill 1


I think we are all able to recognize the fact that the only thing Democrats truly excel at is their ability to do nothing other than to totally fuck up pretty much everything they come in contact with.  And then after they have made a complete mess out of everything it’s somehow that they think they should never bear any of the responsibility for having made things so much worse than they were before they started.  It really is quite remarkable.  However, with that said, what seems to be even more remarkable is the fact that a near majority of the American people, and pretty consistently so, seem more than willing to give Democrats a pass.  This despite the fact that our country is being destroyed, quite literally and by Democrat policies, right before our eyes!

And there is nothing that better proves that point than taking an up-close and personal look at America’s crime-ridden, impoverished inner cities such as Chicago, Detroit, or any number of other big cities, that have been Democrat run monopolies for over a half a century.  The vast majority of our cities are experiencing what can only be described as a slow and rather agonizing death.  Enter now Marc Lamont Hill, a devoted Democrat and, hysterically speaking, a Distinguished ‘Professor’ of African American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia.  They must set the bar pretty low there at Morehouse.  You see, ‘Professor’ Hill believes Democrats should not be blamed for what has taken place, and continues to take place, in our rapidly deteriorating cities.

Appearing on the ‘Clinton News Network’ (CNN) earlier this week to discuss Donald Trump’s latest “law and order” speech which painted a pretty clear picture of how it is that Democrats do nothing more than to prostitute black communities to gin up votes, former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino butted heads with ‘Professor’ Hill over why America’s inner cities have been crippled by crime and poverty for what has been several decades.  Mr. Bongino rightly blamed the Democrats while ‘Professor’ Hill rejected the assertion.  Mr. Bongino said, “These communities have been driven into the ground.”  And he went on to say, “Liberalism correlates with poverty and high crime every single place it’s been tried…I wish I could change it. I wish the Trump campaign could as well.”

But ‘Professor’ Hill seemed to take great offense to Bongino’s statement, to the point where he is actually seen wincing at it.  He said. “They’re Democratic machines but they’re not far left. Michael Nutter was the mayor of Philadelphia. No one would call him far left. I think that’s a bit extreme. It’s not exactly Cuba there. The other piece of, this and you said you’re not a scientist and I’m glad you said that. There’s a difference between correlation and causality.”  He went on to say, “I agree, there’s a connection between these very poor places and Democratic machines, but being Democrat doesn’t cause you to be poor, being liberal doesn’t cause you to be poor. There’s a bunch of top-down policies that enable this to happen.”

‘Professor’ Hill said, “In a place like Ferguson, for example, the flight of jobs is far more important, the destruction of public housing is far more influential than who’s the city councilman or who’s the mayor. Although that’s not a black majority. Same thing in Baltimore.”  And he added, “Again, we need a new way out, but the new way out isn’t to just crack down on Democrats and bring Republicans in. We need new policies that bring in jobs, that bring in investment, and that change the relationship between police and community. That’s not a partisan issue. That’s a much bigger issue.”  But none of the policies which ‘Professor’ Hill says are so badly needed are, in any way, seen as being policies that Democrats are in favor of.

And exactly who is it that ‘Professor’ Hill thinks is making those “top-down policies” in those “Democrat machines”?  I mean by using his rather bizarre logic, the Nazis must not have been responsible for the Holocaust!  He literally MADE the argument to bring in Republicans and didn’t even know it.  That’s how deluded he is.  The policies are Democrat. The programs are Democrat. The politicians are nearly ALL Democrat.   When you have Democrats running your schools for 40 years, Democrats running your local law enforcement for 40 years, Democrats running your city government for 40 years, how is it that one can make the argument that Democrats did not do this.  But then, what else can you expect from the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow and the KKK?

The problem in our cities is that the percentage of whites dropped while that of the blacks increased. Property values dropped, businesses closed, those that could, fled, leaving towns and cities husks of once vibrant places to live and work. As businesses closed and more Section 8 housing increased, property taxes diminished, leaving many cities with serious shortfalls of cash. The dirty little secret of most of these Democrat/progressive strongholds is that they are some of the most violent cities in America.  That does not make a good environment for investment. Black mob violence is an everyday occurrence in many of these cities, driving away shoppers and then the business owners. The result is boarded up shops, dead malls and desolate tourist areas, further exacerbating dismal employment opportunities.

Detroit is the poster child of such progressive policies with Baltimore and Chicago very close behind.  Many more cities like Memphis, Indianapolis, Oakland, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Madison, Washington, D.C., Wilmington, Philadelphia are all plagued by black mob violence.  Law abiding people can only take so much crime before they are made to feel, out of fear for their safety and the safety of their families, that they have no choice but to leave.  Every city will tax them to death, yet fail to clean up the cause of the continuing problems.  Again more whites and Asians will move away, grinding the city down even more as the black population increases in physical size and percentage of the population placing further and greater strain on already limited local resources.

Causality or correlation are irrelevant when Democrats have had 50 years to at least attempt modest improvements, but have, instead, succeeded in only making matters much worse, and in almost every way.  ‘Professor’ Hill really didn’t have an argument, just words. I think he was going to say “The cities vote Democrat because they are poor; they are not poor because they vote Democrat”.  But after 50 years it doesn’t matter which angle you try and spin this, Democrat policies have failed and failed miserably. Then he goes on to say that, “Yes, we need new policies and ideas, but not Republican ones.”  In other words, there will never be new ideas because liberals only plan is always to tax and spend and increase regulations, which IS the main problem.

Here’s a concept that ‘Professor’ Hill and his leftist comrades might want to explore, how about lowering taxes and removing regulations allowing black communities to encourage more entrepreneurs who will then improve their own communities?  Or, how about we stop giving welfare to drug dealers, which then frees them from having to work, and allows them run around loose 24/7 wreaking all manner of havoc upon their neighborhoods.  These are Republican fixes, and because Democrats hate Republicans they will never try anything like this which might actually work, and actually improve the lives of blacks. So it is impossible to take partisanship out of the equation; the only way you can get a different outcome is to vote for a different party.  It’s just that simple.