‘COMMIE CHRIS’ ONCE AGAIN PROVES HE’S MERELY A PROPAGANDIST…

There are few on ‘Fox News’ who are more transparent, when it comes to how much they hate President Trump, than is ‘Commie Chris’ Wallass.  Another member of this anti-Trump ‘Fox Squad’ is Neil Cavuto, as is Ed Henry and Nappi Napolitano.  Wallass is a disgrace to his supposed ‘profession’ of journalism.’  He has continued to make clear his obvious bias against this president, as well as all those associated with him.  He was one of those who was quick to jump onboard the impeachment bandwagon with so many of his colleagues in the ‘fake news’ media and the corrupt Democrats.

Friday on Fox News Channel, “Fox News Sunday,” anchor ‘Commie Chris’ said he did not understand why people were “rallying” behind ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn given he lied to the FBI.  Thursday, President Trump said Flynn had been “essentially exonerated” by new documents unsealed in his criminal case.  As expected, ‘Commie Chris’ apparently took exception to that opinion.  We shouldn’t be surprised, as he is one of the many useful idiots in our ‘fake news’ media to the point where one wonders if he might be under the employ of the Democrat Party.

Anyway, it was ‘Commie Chris’ who said, “And I was kind of surprised that the President said yesterday, ‘Well, maybe I’ll bring him back to the White House.’ It was the President, before any legal case was brought, who fired Flynn because Flynn had lied about his conversation with the Russian ambassador to the Vice President, Mike Pence. Mike Pence came on ‘Fox News Sunday’ just before the inauguration in January of 2016 and said there was no discussion of that, and it turns out he was basing that on what Flynn had told him and that Flynn had lied to him.”

He continued, “So I’m not quite sure I understand why people are all rallying to Flynn’s case. Did the FBI play hardball? Yeah. Guess what? The FBI plays hardball. And guess what? If you are talking to the FBI, and a lot of lawyers would say don’t talk to them unless you have to, don’t lie.”  Did the FBI play hardball?  No, Chris, they purposely misled Flynn.  Wallass is vehemently anti-Trump.  Anything to discredit President Trump, directly or indirectly, is what he will pursue, even to the extent of telling bald-faced lies.  Is this now what’s considered to be “Fair and Balanced?”

What was the FBI playing hardball about Chris?  What crime was the FBI investigating for which they needed truthful information?  Answer: There was none.  Zero, Zip, Zilch, Nada!  There was no crime.  So if Flynn didn’t remember some detail, tough luck FBI. Same legal effect as misremembering some detail to your sister, or some hack reporter. Flynn’s misstatements weren’t “material” to any possible crime for which there was a legitimate pending investigation.  Wallass knows all this.  He’s not stupid. He’s just your basic propagandist simply trying to appear as if unbiased.

Wallass is insufferable and a pompous ass.  And while it would be easy to say that he’s simply too stupid to know the actual facts of this case, sadly I’m afraid that it goes far deeper than that.  ‘Commie Chris’ is well aware of the fact that the FBI agents who originally interviewed Flynn didn’t think that he had actually lied. The lie allegation was dreamed up later by a group of rogue FBI scumbags and evidently approved of by ‘BO’s White House.  In short, Flynn was railroaded.  ‘Commie Chris’ knows this and it makes his comments all the more sinister, even treacherous.

It’s strange how when a Democrat lies, there never seems to be enough evidence to prosecute, yet when it’s a Republican, or some Trump supporter, it’s always quite different.  It’s then that you raid their home at five in the morning and tear the place apart, and then take him to court for anything.  Wallass is a progressive so naturally he’s just fine with any abuse of power as long as the target is someone, ANYONE, on Team Trump.  Flynn’s supposed “lie” to the FBI is a totally SEPARATE issue from the abuse they employed to entrap him.  One has NOTHING to do with the other.

And what I find as being more than a little hilarious is the fact that ‘Commie Chris’ actually believes there are few people able to see right through his ridiculously loaded ‘questions’ that are rarely ever more than lowbrow accusations without any factual support.  I don’t think Wallass knows how to formulate and then ask a genuinely good question!  Which makes Wallass more of a propagandist than an actual journalist.  I assume that Wallass simply doesn’t care that most people are able to easily see through his various affectations and charades, I can’t see it any other way.

Wallass chooses to ignore completely the Gestapo type tactics that were used by these FBI agents concerning Flynn’s family, after all that’s not important.  The end always justified the means.  General Flynn was essentially a marked man by ‘BO’, obviously, and was questioned by rouge FBI agent Strokz.  A reasonable person, based on what we now know, might come to the conclusion he got twisted into knots and that was used against him.  Why did the Mueller team withhold the evidence that would’ve shed light on the real situation?  Terrible situation they put that soldier in.

Look, Flynn was intentionally entangled in a perjury-trap, something that the FBI apparently does routinely in order to convict the innocent.  In most of these cases they just unethically use the resources of the Federal government to bankrupt the defendants into declaring guilt!  Nobody can get justice when the deck is so obviously stacked against them in every conceivable way!  And the fact that ‘Commie Chris’ apparently sees absolutely nothing wrong this should tell us all we need to know about ‘Commie Chris’ and provide enough reason for never watching his program!

BRET BAIER, FOREVER THE NEVERTRUMPER…

You’ve got hand it to the ‘NeverTrumpers,’ at ‘Fox News’ as they continue to willingly pull out all the stops in their ongoing effort to sound as bat-shit crazy as their media ‘colleagues’ over at the Communist News Network (CNN) and MSDNC.  I say this because it was on Thursday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” that ‘NeverTrumper’ Bret Baier once again floated the notion that president had yet again done himself in with a comment that he had made about the former corrupt, and now deceased, congressman John Dingell.

It was during his rally in Michigan on Wednesday last night, that President Trump mentioned Debbie Dingell, and how she called to ask him for a state funeral for her husband John.  The president relayed a conversation to the audience that he had had with John’s wife, Debbie, who thanked him for honoring her husband.  According to the president, she told him that her husband was “looking down” and would be “so thrilled” at the gestures the president made to honor the life of a man who hated him.  President Trump added that perhaps Dingell was “looking up” at him.

And of course it was those all across the ‘fake news’ media complex that immediately went nuts, criticizing President Trump for his insensitive remarks about how the now deceased Dingell would have to be “looking up” at the president, obviously implying, that he had gone to Hell. Baier joined in saying the President Trump’s comment will likely hurt him politically.  Baier said, “Let me say one thing about the Michigan incident and Debbie Dingell. The president stepped in it on this. He had largely a political positive even though he was impeached, as hard as it is to believe.”

Baier went on to add, “By saying what he said about Representative Dingell, he really possibly hurt himself not only just politically in Michigan but also just with independents who said ‘do you really have to say something like that?’”  Look, this guy Dingell was far from being a saint, but apparently none of that seems to matter to the NeverTrumpers like Bret.  It’s always the same thing with these folks, anyone and everyone is free to hurl all manner of insults at the president with nary a word being said by anyone.  But let the president return fire and all Hell breaks loose.

So President Trump gave Dingell a state funeral with full honors and then his seat-usurping wife voted to impeach him.  I guess it’s true what they say, no good deed goes unpunished.  And I wonder if Baier considers those who have tried to label President Trump as being such things as a Nazi, a racist or a white supremacist, or have called for his son to be caged and raped, as having stepped in it as well?  Probably not, after all they weren’t serious, right?  But yet one joke about a dead dirt-bag, and once again it’s President Trump who is seen as the bad guy.

Personally, I’m in agreement with the president, Dingell, most definitely, would be looking up from Hell.  After all, that’s where baby-killers go when they die.  I would dare to say that it’s pretty much ALL Democrats who come to end up in Hell.  After all, I’m not sure how being responsible for allowing the death of millions of unborn babies to take place, or creating and enforcing policies that keep millions of Americans trapped poverty or refusing to take the necessary action to keep blacks from killing thousands of other blacks every year, gets you into Heaven.

And where were all of these ‘fake news’ types, now spouting this faux outrage when Dingell was regularly trashing President Trump on social media?  Like in January 2017 when Dingell mocked President Trump’s ability to work with Mexico to secure our borders.  The last laugh, was, unfortunately, on Dingell who didn’t live long enough to see the results of the president’s dogged determination to keep America safe from foreign invaders and to keep illegal aliens from stealing American jobs.  And in October 2016, Dingell tweeted that candidate Donald J. Trump can “go to hell.”

Baier has been a NeverTrumper from the very beginning, but has been getting far more vocal about it.  He’s someone who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and as such he tends to come across as less of a journalist and more a member of the resistance.  And perhaps Bret can explain why the demeaning comments directed at Washington and Jefferson are acceptable, but the comments about Dingell are not?  After all, all three are dead.  Now I’m not much in favor of wasting time commenting on those underground, but why is it ok for Democrats but not the president.

And when Democrats, as well as their many minions in ‘fake news,’ say about President Trump, “Impeach the motherfu*cker,” or when he’s called Satan, a mass murderer, a racist, a KKK Supporter, and any number of other things by loons like Bobby DeNiro and his many ‘celebrity’ friends, what do we hear from Baier?  Absolutely nothing.  Yet when the president said something that’s probably true, if Democrats even believe in Hell, that’s horrible. I hate ‘Fox News’ and all of its NeverTrumpers, like Baier.  These days he’s on par with the loon, Juan Williams.

Bret still doesn’t get it. Average Americans in fly-over country are not bothered by President Trump’s crudeness. Quite the contrary, we love it, we love the fact that he speaks his mind and takes the fight directly to the Democrats.  We’re tired of watching Republicans sit on their hands as the Democrats bully them right into a corner. We have been waiting a long time for a fighter like Donald Trump to come along and, to be honest with you, Bret, we are more than willing to lose a few “pearl clutching Granny’s” such as yourself so long as Trump is kicking ass and taking names.

Baier is a pompous ass. President Trump, who went out of his way to honor Dingell, now gets a vote FOR his impeachment from Dingell’s village-idiot-of-a-wife, think about it. And she and the ‘fake news’ commentators can’t take a joke?  How offensive is it to be impeached when nothing illegal was done.  The charges are false, the accusations are lies, there was virtually no wrong-doing.  Differences of opinion, sure, but Democrats don’t agree with Republicans on anything and their hatred for President Trump is unsurpassed in the history of Democrats hating Republicans.

‘COMMIE CHRIS’ WALLACE CONTINUES TO SHOW HIS TRUE COLORS…

Yes, this is another attempt on my part to make the case that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace is, in fact, nothing more than just another run-of-the-mill America-hating douche bag masquerading as, you guessed it, a journalist.  And the ultimate irony?  The network on which he appears continues to bill itself as being “Fair and Balanced.” It’s every time he opens his mouth that he continues to make clear how it has now gotten to the point where we should longer waste our time listening to him.  After all, life is far too short to waste even a second of it listening to assholes like ‘Commie Chris.’  And he recently once again made quite clear, just as his father did before him, his obvious lack of any true journalistic standards as well as a lack of objectivity and fairness.

‘Commie Chris’ is yet another one of those who populate the ‘fake news’ media complex who continue to make quite clear that he is less of a journalist than he is a political hit man, so to speak, currently under the employ of the Democrat Party.  Commie Chris’ is a joke, a fraud and someone who has repeatedly shown himself to be someone desperate to be taken seriously.  But it’s because of his own words, and his very obvious political biases that he continues to put out for all to see that makes taking him seriously totally impossible.  You see, ‘Commie Chris’ seems long ago to have given up on any real desire to be a bona fide ‘journalist, choosing instead to be more of a propagandist who’s thrilled with the sound of his own voice.

And it was on Friday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “American Newsroom,” that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace once again proved all that I have said about him to be true, when he chose to refute Republican complaints that the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry was unfair to President Trump. ‘Commie Chris’ said, “Well, my feeling is that if you are having trouble with the facts, you argue process. That’s what Republicans are doing right now. The Democrats have gotten some very damaging information from people like William Taylor, the acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Fiona Hill, who used to be one of the top advisors in the National Security Council on Ukraine.”  Once again ‘Commie Chris’ reveals his difficulty to tell fact from fiction.

And yet he went on to say, “Evidence that seems to tie more of a quid pro quo, that there is some evidence from these people working in the Trump administration that the president linked aid to Ukraine, White House meeting with Ukrainian president to getting oppo research on the Democrats.”  He continued, “What Republicans are doing, they’re arguing the process is unfair. You can make that argument, but if you look back during Benghazi when that was being investigated by Trey Gowdy, they had hearings in private and depositions in private. You try to build your case, figure out who are the witnesses that can say something, and who can’t. Then you will end up holding public hearings anyway.”  You simply can’t make this shit up!!

And he added, “There is not a chance in the world they aren’t going the bring the key witnesses up to be questioned by both Republicans and Democrats. Democrats have to make the case for impeachment before they vote. I just think that in the end, after we have these must-see TV hearings with these key witnesses in public in November, I’m not sure people are going to care a lot about what the process was in October.” He concluded, “For all the talk this is being done in private, there are 45 Republicans who are members of these three committees who have access to this. It’s not like just the Democrats in a room alone with these Trump administration officials. There are 45 Republicans who can be in the room and ask them questions as well.”

So we have yet another example of ‘Commie Chris’ doing is best to offer some level of assistance to the Democrats, but not really making much sense while doing so.  Because whether or not he wants to admit it, it’s the “facts” that are on President Trump’s side, and not on the side of the Democrats.  And simply declaring that that is not the case doesn’t make it true.  In fact that is exactly why the Democrats have gone, and continue to go, to such great lengths in their many attempts to manipulate the entire process in their effort to swing public opinion.  You simply can’t be that dumb and still call yourself an objective journalist.  But you can easily choose to ignore all if the actual facts when you’re little more than a partisan political hack!

The facts ‘Commie Chris’ is likely referring to are those the Democrats have chosen to selectively leak.  But there’s one fact both the Democrats, and ‘Commie Chris’ seem to casually cast aside because it shows how this entire process is exactly what the president has called it, a “witch hunt!”  The fact that the only two people on the call, President Trump and the Ukranian president, have both stated, and pretty definitively so, that there was no quid pro quo.  We’ve even seen the transcript of the call.  And yet, ‘Commie Chris’ seems not to be bothered by how O-Bummer once enlisted the help of the Ukranian government to investigate Paul Manafort or how three Democrat senators wrote the letter to the Ukraine president demanding that the Ukraine cooperate with the Mueller investigation or forfeit U.S. aid?

To begin with ‘Commie Chris’ likes to bill himself as being a straight up news anchor.  But it’s these days that he seems far more interested in injecting his blatant leftwing ‘opinions’ into the important stories of the day, and the impeachment story in particular.  He has no business injecting his opinions into what is supposedly a factual account of the news. If he wants to do that he needs to get a job over at ‘fake news’ HQ, CNN, like his friend Shepard Smith, where even the news anchors frequently inject their opinions into everything. Every time you opine you become a little less objective and lose a little more credibility.  ‘Commie Chris’ learned well at the feet of the master deceiver, his own father. The apple fell pretty close to the tree.

I just don’t see where President Trump has done anything wrong because, quite frankly I’ve seen no any actual evidence of any wrong doing.  And that comes after his being the most investigated person in history and with nothing being found. In fact, he may be the most honest person to ever occupy the White House. Can you honestly name ONE thing that has been proven that he’s done that’s illegal or even unethical?  The vast majority of those involved in this continuing impeachment charade all have an extreme bias against President Trump. Which tends to taint whatever their contribution to the process. And if you don’t think they have a bias, just listen to the rage and irrationality in their voice whenever they talk about him.

The underlying error behind ‘Commie Chris’s’ entire argument is that he somehow knows “the facts.” So as I said earlier all he truly knows is what he, as well as the rest of us, has been told him through leaks.  If the facts were really stacking up against President Trump, we would be watching these proceedings 24/7 on every cable ‘news’ channel.  The process is criticized because we don’t get any actual facts, only rumors, innuendo and hearsay.  The adversarial system that allows for counter witnesses and cross examination is what yields any actually ‘facts’ of the case.  ‘Commie Chris’ is either a dumber-than- dirt buffoon or is knowingly misleading people.  You can take your pick.  Personally, I’m going with both!

Hey ‘Commie Chris,’ how about you stop with all of the rhetorical sarcasm!  With everything that the Democrats have done, and continue to do, in this farce together with everything that ‘Pencil Neck’ Schiff has continued to lie about and still you choose to happily support what the Democrat s are doing.  Absolutely amazing!  However, it does suit you!  You insist on mixing news reporting with editorial nonsense and opinionated drivel.  You’ve become irritating!  And your obvious disdain and contempt for President Trump is clouding what’s left of your judgment.  But then you’re far from being alone in that regard there at ‘Fox News.’  Those with names like Williams, Napolitano, Cavuto, Rivera, MacCallum and Baier to name just a few.

JUDGE ‘NAPI’ NAPOLITANO, JUST ANOTHER USEFUL IDIOT FOR THE LEFT…

Yes, there was once a time I actually thought old ‘Napi’ knew what he was talking about, but sadly that now seems like such a very long time ago.  These days, whether it has anything to do with the fact that the president turned down his request for a seat on the Supreme Court, or because he might be suffering from yet another strain of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), old ‘Napi’ seems to have seriously slipped a sizable cog.  The original strain of TDS showed up in those who opposed his running for president, this new strain seems to inflict those who don’t get from him what it is they think he should give them.  Both strains are very dangerous, and are apparently incurable.  And in Elijah Cummings’ case, apparently either can even be deadly.

So anyway, it was just this past Wednesday that Fox News’ ‘legal analyst’ Judge ‘Napi’ Napolitano released his “Judge Napolitano’s Chambers” video, in which he said the impeachment inquiry currently underway was actually following the Constitution.  ‘Napi’ said, “Is the impeachment process fair? That is not an easy question to answer. The short answer is—the impeachment process is whatever the House of Representatives decides it should be. That is because of two clauses in the Constitution. One says the House of Representatives shall have sole power to impeach. So only the House of Representatives can conduct an impeachment. The second clause states that the House of Representatives can write its own rules.”

And he added, “So the House can write whatever rules it wants.”  He continued, “You may not like the rules. You may not agree with the people that are doing this. But under House rules, any one of the House committees—in this case, the Intelligence Committee—can begin to interview witnesses. The witness are interviewed by Democratic members of the committee and Republican members of the committee to decide if these witnesses have evidence of impeachable offenses by the president. Then they have to decide—are the witnesses credible, is the evidence believable, is this a case for impeachment, should we present this to the public? All of that takes time and is traditionally done behind closed doors.”

And old ‘Napi’ then went on to say, “If they decide to move forward on impeachment, there will be great public debates on the floor of the House and elsewhere about the meaning of the evidence and the credibly of the witnesses.”   And he then added, “If the president of the United States of America intentionally withheld military aid and financial assistance the Congress had authorized and ordered to an ally the Ukraine, which was threatened with invasion by Russia, until that ally did a personal favor for the president’s campaign that he asked for, did he commit an impeachable offense? The answer is — if the House of Representatives says it was impeachable, it was impeachable.”  Ya know, I can’t believe I ever actually liked this guy.

I have virtually no doubt that old ‘Napi’ would never have been in favor of impeachment being brought against ex-president O-Bummer, despite the fact that there was an overwhelming amount of evidence of his very real crimes.  But old ‘Napi’ appears to be all in when it comes to impeaching President Trump based on totally frivolous charges, and with the proceedings being conducted completely behind closed doors. ‘Napi’ quoted that the “House of Representatives shall have sole power to impeach”, but he seems unwilling to recognize that what’s happening is the Speaker of the House is impeaching, not the House. They haven’t voted as a body on whether to begin the process, proving this is simply a personal vendetta and a sham.

‘Napi’ is offensive in his rhetoric against the President. He is offensive in that he minces and spins his views against President Trump, and I guess he thinks the public is too dumb to know the difference. Because these are VERY politically sensitive times and I no longer have the time nor the inclination to listen to ‘Napi’s’ BS.  ‘Napi’ reminds me a bit of that scorned ex-girlfriend who sees you out with a hot new girl. There is really very little that he won’t say or do in what now appears to be his own little effort to ‘get’ President Trump and likely for no other reason than because he denied a seat on the Supreme Court. He’s is an immature buffoon and his actions make it clear he would have been a terrible choice for ANY job in this administration.

The impeachment process will always be considered a political hit job unless they follow established rules and protocols.  You can’t, as Democrats have become so famous for of doing, simply make shit up as you go along.  But since Pelosi can’t really do that because if Republicans were to be given a chance to subpoena witnesses her ‘impeachment’ charade would soon be exposed for what it is, as a political hit job aimed at hurting President Trump as we begin heading into the 2020 election.  Either way Pelosi & Co. loses, so they decided the safest thing to do would be to keep things tucked safely behind closed doors and just spread rumors and badmouth the president publicly.  And apparently ‘Napi’ views all of this as being constitutional?

‘COMMIE CHRIS’ WALLACE, TRUMP-HATING HACK!!!

Now that old light-in-the-loafers Shepard Smith is finally out at ‘Fox News’ might it be too much to hope for that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace might soon be following him out the door as well?  ‘Commie Chris’ has long possessed an over-inflated sense of importance, and still fancies himself an ‘expert’ on ALL things related to politics.  Of course it’s in Wallace’s case that the definition of ‘expert’ is simply ‘a drip under pressure.’  ‘Commie Chris’ is a know-nothing and a fraud.  Nothing more, nothing less.

It was on Friday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” “Fox News Sunday” anchor ‘Commie Chris’ once again made clear just how clueless he truly is by calling out former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for criticizing the impeachment inquiry against President Trump.  During an earlier appearance on Fox News Gingrich accused Nancy Pelosi of carrying out “an unconstitutional coup d’état, an effort to use the power of the Congress to change the outcome for the American people.”

‘Commie Chris’ said, “I’m a little surprised at Speaker Gingrich, who I greatly respect. This is the exact opposite of unconstitutional. The Constitution specifically says that impeachment is left to Congress with very little statement as to how they want to conduct it. And in fact, I think I remember that Newt Gingrich did an impeachment effort, led an impeachment effort against Bill Clinton in 1998. Was that an effort to overturn an election? No, he was investigating stuff.”

He added, “We may find out that there is some there-there — there’s no there-there, but to call it unconstitutional or an effort to overturn an election, that’s a reach particularly for somebody like Newt Gingrich who was involved in the last impeachment effort.”  ‘Commie Chris’ is a buffoon.  It’s Gingrich who knows the CORRECT process for an impeachment and ‘Commie Chris’ who does not. Until Pelosi holds a vote to convene a REAL impeachment inquiry she can go pound sand.

It’s now clear that ‘Commie Chris’ has become so blinded by his hatred of the president that he can’t see the distinction between how Gingrich carried out the impeachment process and how Pelosi is doing so. Gingrich had a vote of the House, Pelosi has not. Gingrich allowed the Democrats due process and the presumption of innocence and the right to confront and cross examine witnesses, Pelosi has not. Gingrich allowed the Democrats to subpoena witnesses and Pelosi has not.

In 1998 the majority Republicans did things by the book.  Gingrich took a vote in the full House and gave the minority Democrats representation rights on the Judiciary committee and subpoena power to call and interrogate witnesses for the defense. Pelosi has simply chosen to deny the Republicans all of those pesky constitutional rights in her clown act.  And I don’t recall hearing the Republicans announcing plans to move forward with an impeachment of ‘Slick Willy’ the day after he was elected.

Gingrich followed procedures, had actual evidence of wrongdoing, held the vote for the inquiry, and allowed due process rights for ‘Slick Willy.’  Pelosi and her comrades are doing the exact opposite, violating both standard procedures and denying President Trump his due process rights.  Without the vote for the inquiry, and the chance for the president to confront and challenge his accusers, as well as his right of presumption of innocence until proven guilty, this clown show is unconstitutional.

There was a real crime committed in Clinton’s case, perjury as defined by a court ruling. In the current case against Trump, no real crime has been committed except in the twisted imagination of the Democrats. The Democrats are choosing to ignore the real crime committed by ‘Crooked Joe’ in extorting the Ukrainian government. So we know the Democrats are not concerned with the rule of law, but with overturning an election. That’s vastly different than Gingrich’s impeachment effort.

Gingrich is absolutely correct. And either ‘Commie Chris’ is too stupid to understand what he’s saying or simply refuses to acknowledge that Gingrich is correct. There has been no House vote to impeach.  Therefore there is no valid or legal basis upon which to even call for impeachment. The Democrats are doing all of this because they are still upset that President Trump won the 2016 election and they’re trying any juvenile tactic they can come up with to try to politically hurt him. It’s not going to work.

‘Crooked Joe’ Biden admitted to using his office to blackmail Ukraine to fire it’s prosecutor who was investigating his son’s company owned by a Ukraine oligarch and was poised to interview Hunter.  As president, Trump is mandated to investigate crimes committed in a foreign country by U.S. citizens.  U.S citizens who commit crimes outside of the U.S. are not protected from prosecution, regardless of social or political status.  He did not ask for political dirt on a political opponent as Hitlery did.

In fact what the Democrats are doing is not an impeachment inquiry even though that’s what they’re calling it in an effort to fool the American people.  What it is is nothing more than Democrat controlled committees subverting their proper functions into a political opposition research squad paid for by taxpayers.  If they want to be a legitimate impeachment inquiry they have vote on it and open the process to the entire House because it is the entire House that will vote on impeachment.

Conspiring to overthrow a duly elected President of the United States is a crime, it’s called sedition, and if found guilty of said offense one becomes eligible for up to 20 years in prison.  The Democrats announced on November 9, 2016 that they would stop at nothing in their goal of impeaching President-elect Donald Trump.  And in the nearly 3 years since, the Democrats have attempted to manufacture all manner of “high crime and misdemeanor” that would then allow them to remove the president.

Democrats first paid for and then pushed completely unfounded accusations in the Steele Dossier, a Russian Collusion hoax, a couple of hooker ‘allegations’ and two biased ‘whistleblower’ allegations of what, exactly?  Nothing! The Democrats have no ideas and no plan for run against President Trump in 2020.  They see impeachment as being their only hope in bringing down the president before being made to face him in the next election.  And their desperation becomes more obvious each and every day.

It’s ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace’s hatred of President Trump that has caused him to lose what little commonsense and objectivity it is that he may have at one time possessed.  He pretends to be a ‘journalist’ but is nothing more than a cheerleader for the left, most recently proving that by flat out disagreeing with Gingrich over Constitutional interpretation.  These days he simply provides viewers with his opinion but refuses to admit that that’s what he is doing, instead he continues to claim he’s a ‘journalist.’

What’s now going on is not a constitutional exercise, it’s a temper tantrum in the extreme, an amateurish foot stamping, eye-rolling, hair-tossing, hyper dramatic valley girl tantrum by Democrats locked in teenage angst.  While all of the noise they’re making is positively grating, these people are nowhere near smart enough to strategically or tactically organize even a tentative foray out of their political hookah bar. Meanwhile President Trump simply continues to ‘Make America Great Again!’

The new normal, as begun by the Democrat Party, is if the one side elects someone the other side doesn’t like, they can impeach them. The same thing goes for judges. Our Republic cannot withstand this type of destruction and remain a Republic.  The fact that ‘Commie Chris’ refuses to acknowledge that freedom cannot survive attacks by those who are willing to do absolutely anything for power, just shows him to be the closet socialist that we have always suspected him to be.  Like father, like son.

SHEPARD SMITH AND THE METAMORPHOSIS OF ‘FOX NEWS’…

Not that one thing has anything to do with the other, I suppose, but it seems that since he came out of the closet Shepard Smith has become increasingly unraveled, becoming even more vocal regarding his dislike for the president.  If this were a few years ago I might suggest that perhaps Shep move to the Communist News Network (CNN) or even MSNBC.  But times being what they are, with there now being little difference, these days, between Fox News and the other ‘news’ networks there’s really no need for that.  Because with few exceptions, ‘Fox News’ has turned into just another Trump hating network that spews nothing but anti-Trump propaganda.

I mean Fox seems to have quite the cast of Trump-hating players now on the payroll.  Of course there’s Wallace, Williams and Rivera who have long been obvious in their contempt of the president, but since even before he was elected the list has grown considerably to include names like Baier, MacCallum, Henry, Roberts, Cavuto and Napolitano to name but a few.  I’m sure I’m leaving out someone, which is really no surprise as the only ones I tend to watch these days on a regular basis are Carlson, Hannity and Ingraham.  And yet there are those times I find myself turning the channel during Carlson and Ingraham.  But these three are all I tune in for anymore.

Which, of course, brings me back to Fox News ‘anchor’ Shep Smith who, just yesterday, made it quite clear just how totally unhinged he has become, of late, as he actually went so far as to suggest a cockamamie theory of his, regarding a possible motivation behind President Trump’s recent decision to pull troops out of Syria.  He called it the “politics of distraction,” the purpose of which, I guess, would be to get people talking about other things before eventually deciding to bring them back.  But Smith’s Monday afternoon “Shepard Smith Reporting” guest, Brookings Institution senior fellow Michael O’Hanlon, had yet a different theory behind the withdrawal.

It was after asking O’Hanlon if troops were already on the move that Smith asked, “I ask because you wonder how much of this really is the politics of distraction.”  Shep went on to say, “There is a lot on the president today. There’s a second whistleblower. There is so much going on, a late-night announcement like this, and then all of the Republicans are turning on him, the leader in the Senate, Lindsey Graham – you name it – Republicans have come out against him on this. So you wonder if it is not one of those things to get people to talk about all day and then at some point and he’ll go, ‘eh, never mind.’”  Just another bit of wishful thinking, Shep?

O’Hanlon said, “There is that possibility.”  And then he went on to add, “But you know, even though I’m in favor of staying in Syria and I’m against the president’s recent decision, I think he speaks for a lot of people in his frustration with the seemingly interminable Middle East wars that are also very hard to understand.”  He said, “If you are President Trump and you’ve got a million issues on your plate, there’s probably a temptation to say, I don’t want any more to do with this conflict.”  And he continued, “I sense that is where he’s coming from more than anything else. I think it is bad way to make policy, but I have some degree of sympathy.”

Shep now essentially epitomizes all that ‘Fox News’ has now become.  And I find it rather laughable, hysterical really, that those on Fox are still able refer to themselves, and with a straight face no less, as being “Fair and Balanced,” when they have so very obviously become what is anything but.  It has become increasingly difficult to take nearly any of the network regulars seriously.  It’s like they’ve become a parody of their former selves.  I no longer have anywhere I can go, at least on television, to get anything other than an endless stream of pointless drivel telling me how corrupt the guy I voted for, and intend to vote for again, truly is.

And as much as Shep might fancy himself being a serious ‘journalist, he typically comes across as being something far less.  And it’s like so many others now at Fox that he’s seen as little more than a propagandist, a spewer of the requisite talking points like the obedient little robot that he is.  Therefore it’s become rather difficult to determine what the exact purpose of his program might be?  Is it simply a platform from which he can hurl accusations at the president?  I mean it most certainly is not a source of any usable ‘news’ or information despite the fact that that’s likely how Shep views it.  It’s a very rare occurrence when Shep even makes any sense.

And I can’t help but wonder if perhaps Shep might have taken the time to tune into his colleague Tucker Carlson’s show last night where Tucker ran a clip of ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton asking Tony Blair for assistance prior to the 2000 election.  Probably not!  But it’s once again that we were provided with yet another example of how Democrats always accuse others of doing exactly what they themselves are doing.  But then I’m quite sure that Shep would see virtually no similarity there, as he seems to have been sufficiently blinded by his Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).  I mean he’s morphed into a kind of cartoon character, to the point where he’s now little more than a joke.

And it’s rather insidious how these Trump haters have no problem whatsoever in holding President Trump to an entirely different standard than they do any other president including O-Bummer who was, without question, the single most corrupt individual to EVER hold the office of President.  And too, it was O-bummer who played a very critical role in first trying to sabotage the candidacy of Donald Trump, and when that failed has continued to play a role in undermining Trump’s presidency.  But again, I’m sure as far as Shep, and any number of others there at ‘Fox News,’ may be concerned, it’s all good.  After all, President Trump deserves to be impeached.

JUST ONE MORE REASON NOT TO WATCH FOX…

Have you ever noticed how there is nothing that squeals louder than a stuck NeverTrumper, and especially one of those NeverTrumpers seen on Fox News?  And make no mistake regardless of their claim to be “fair and balanced”, the network, over the past few years, has become considerably less of both as well as for more antagonistic toward conservatives.  Fox News, for the most past, has now become ‘Faux News,’ and because of those like Bret Baier, Shepard Smith, Judge ‘Napi’, Chris Wallace and many others, I’ve come to spend much less time watching the network.

And this past Thursday another of the network’s more vocal NeverTrumpers made it known that, by golly, he’s no stooge of this president.  It was during “Your World with Neil Cavuto,” that the show’s namesake took it upon himself to spew a bizarre monologue, aka rant, the apparent purpose of which was to slam President Trump for daring to criticize Fox News on Twitter.  Cavuto is another one at Fox who I once actually enjoyed watching, but have grown tired of mostly because I think the old Cavuto would likely despise the New Cavuto for thinking that his audience is stupid.

Cavuto said, “I think the president watches Fox. I also think he’s getting sick of Fox, which is weird because I think he gets pretty fair coverage on Fox. But the president making clear that to fact-check him is to be all but dead to him and a legion of supporters, who let me know in no uncertain terms that I am either with him totally or a never-Trumper bully.”  He continued, “First of all, Mr. President, we don’t work for you. I don’t work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just cover you — call balls and strikes.”  Sounds to me like the president hit a nerve.

Anyway, Cavuto then went on to say, “Our job is to keep score, not settle scores. In my case, to report the economic numbers when they’re good and when they’re bad, both when the markets are soaring and when they’re tumbling, when trade talks are looking like they’re coming together and when they are looking like falling apart. It’s called being fair and balanced, Mr. President.”  He added, “You’re entitled to your point of view, Mr. President. But you’re not entitled to your own set of facts.” Cavuto accomplished nothing with his idiotic rant other than to make himself look like an ass.

Cavuto is one of those there at the network who does all that he can to constantly provide a little rain on the President and does so very passively, and sort of on the sly. The manner in which he questions his guests seems to depend entirely upon their relationship to the president, with a more aggressive line of questions being reserved for those closer to the president.  He’s also not above coming out with some sort of negative hypothetical and then attempting to give it legs, I’ve noticed it for years.  Also I haven’t really considered Cavuto to be ‘fair and balanced’ for awhile.

And when it comes to the Democrats’ ongoing efforts to try to stir up fears regarding a pending recession as their latest ploy to bring about the defeat of President Trump in 2020, I have absolutely no doubt that Cavuto will more than happy to assist in that endeavor in any way that he can.  I’m sure he will gladly lend a hand by adding whatever level of authenticity that he can to the very bogus claims of an economic downturn that is supposed to be right around the corner.  He’d likely see it as just doing his part in the effort to ensure that President Trump is defeated.

Really, President Trump’s only complaint is the very same thing that so many other viewers have been complaining about. That Fox News brings on Democrats, allows them say all manner of outrageous things, never challenges them in any meaningful way before proceeding to give more time to spew their idiocy.  And it’s those on the right who are allowed to barely get a word in edgewise and are then endlessly challenged.  And Fox polls are farmed out to anti-Trump pollsters who sample more Democrats making the polls believable. Fox News has sold out and everyone knows it.

Look, I don’t need to constantly be told how great and wonderful the president is, but if you’re not going to at least be giving him a fair shake then I’m not going to watch you.  And I if I’m going to be subjected to the very same sort of ‘fake news’ drivel coming from many of the headliners on Fox News that is being spewed by the drones there on CNN and MSNBC, then where’s my incentive to watch Fox?  So for the most part I’ve pretty much given up on the network except for those occasional times when there is nothing else to watch and I tune in to Tucker, Hannity or Ingraham.

BRET BAIER, JUST ONE OF MANY ‘NEVERTRUMPERS’ THERE AT FOX NEWS…

I think we can all agree that as much as Fox News may be routinely portrayed by those on the left as being some bastion of rabid right-wingers, it is also home to a rather significant number of pretty vocal ‘NeverTrumpers’, many of whom, I’m quite sure, would feel right at home on either the Communist News Network (CNN) or possibly even MSNBC.  Other than Hannity, who is obvious about his support for Trump, Carlson, who you never really know where he stands on Trump, and Ingraham, the rest are rather obvious regarding their dislike for the president.

Bret Baier is one who makes no bones about his dislike of the president.  It was on this past Tuesday’s episode of the Fox News Channel’s “The Daily Briefing,” that he said the president trolls the media and the left because he “wants heads to explode.”  Host Dana Perino asked him about Trump’s latest tweet on Russian meddling and Baier said, “I think in the media, we overall read a lot into these tweets. Maybe we shouldn’t read as much as we read into them. Today you heard the house Speaker Paul Ryan say that the president was trolling people with the security clearance.”

Baier continued, “I think literally that this president sometimes does troll the media and the left. I think that he wants heads to explode. And when he says that he’s really concerned that Russia’s going to interfere in the election, I mean, that’s exactly opposite of what he said in Helsinki. And that is exactly opposite of what he’s said––kind of cleaned up––all last week.”

He added, “So when he says that and tweets it and says they are going to be helping the Democrats, even though Vladimir Putin said in the press conference that he was pulling for Trump in the election, people’s heads explode. They react, they overreact, we cover the overreaction, and everyone in the middle of the country says, you know what?”

I still remember when Baier, Kelly and Wallace had those smirks on their faces during candidate Trump’s first primary debate, thinking that their clever gotcha questions would make Trump look like a novice nobody.  And Baier has yet to get over that first debate when Trump not only beat all the other candidates on stage, but the three ‘moderators’ as well!  Baier was totally in shock, even more so than on election night, he never thought it could be done! He gave Trump NO credit, Baier should never have listened to Wallace and Kelly!  He’s been back-peddling ever since!

And while I would be willing to bet that Baier fancies himself to be a bona fide journalist, I would argue that unless he is able to be a bit more objective regarding how it is that he covers our current president, he’s no better than those purveyors of  ‘fake news’ in what was once referred to as the ‘mainstream media.’  I used to think differently of him, but with the arrival onto the scene of President Trump, Baier’s bias has become much more apparent, even obvious when it comes to the president as well as his many supporters and even other folks there at Fox.

These days I watch very little Fox News, much less than I used to.  The only ones I tend to watch are Tucker, Sean and Laura.  As far as the rest of them go, it differs little from watching CNN or MSNBC.  Baier seems to always make sure his little ‘panel’ is loaded up with fellow ‘NeverTrumpers’ to the point where it’s become unbearable to watch, so I don’t.  But like I said, Baier is far from being the only guilty party, it’s gotten to where there is virtually NOTHING worth watching on Fox anywhere between 9 am in the morning to 8 pm at night.  It’s one NeverTrumper after another.

SHEPARD SMITH GOES RIGHT OFF THE DEEP END…

It was back in the very early days of Fox News, during a time which I watched those on the network far more than I watch any of them now, that I would typically make sure that I was home in time to catch Shepard Smith’s nightly program.  But it has been since then that Shep has, gradually over time, seemed to be move increasingly further to left to the point where, once he came out of the closet, he had come to more closely resemble any of the loons that we now see on MSNBC as well as CNN.

And apparently he has continued his slide into leftwing kookdom as evidenced by his very recent, and somewhat scathing, assessment of the results from the historic summit between President Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.  Smith began his rant by saying, “The United States made concessions in exchange for no hard promises.”  Adding, “Stopping joint military exercises with South Korea while North Korea makes a vague commitment to work together towards denuclearization.”

He went on to say, “The agreement the leaders signed are very short on specifics.” He continued, “The talk happened, hands shaken, photos taken, and during a private meeting, promises were apparently made.”  He said, “But who wanted what? Well, America demanded complete verifiable and irreversible denuclearization. C.V.I.D. Complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization.”  And he said, “There is no guarantee of that.”  He complained, “Not even words to that effect!”

And Smith said, “And we may not know for years whether we’re actually now on that road, or left in the potholes of paths past.”  He declared, “Kim Jong Un got it all!” He said, “But Kim Jong Un? He wanted the photos.”  He continued saying, “The seat at the table. He wanted the legitimacy that came with the event. The handshake with America’s president. And he wanted those military exercises with the Americans and the South Koreans that happen every year to stop.”

“Kim Jong Un got it all,” Smith said, “for actually doing nothing.”  And he said, “Plus he got a promise, lacking specifics, granted, of security for the North Korean regime,” he added. “A regime that has an estimated 120,000 political prisoners across the nation. A regime that tortures and murders its own citizens, imprisons children for the actions of parents and grandparents, and a leader who has committed crimes against humanity.” And he repeated, “No specifics!”  By this time he was nearly apoplectic.

Smith criticized the promise of “denuclearization” from the North Koreans, saying there were no guarantees in the agreement. “No specifics of how to do it,” he said. “No timeline on getting it done. No verification. No inspection. No nothing else, just generalities.”  Adding, “President Trump says he trusts Chairman Kim, and that he’s ready to start a new chapter with North Korea. What will the president’s special bond with Kim Jong Un mean for the U.S. and its allies?  No specifics.”

Smith has what can only be described as being a rather severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).  He has now joined the ranks of those who will always find a negative side to anything that President Trump accomplishes.  And yet, despite the media only reporting negatives and ignoring the positives, and a hateful bunch of congressmen aligned against him, the president continues to accomplish great things, which only serves to cause those like Smith to become even more unhinged.

And what is it, exactly, that Liberals and these NeverTrumpers seem to have in common? Pure Political Madness.  First, they all screamed, ”Trumps hard rhetoric towards Kim Jon Un, calling him Rocket Man and saying our nuclear button works, etc…, is going to get us into a Nuclear War!!!!! Trump is losing against Kim Jon Un!!!!” Now they’re screaming, ”Trump is being too nice to Kim Jon Un, he ended the military drills!!!! Oh my God!!!! Trump is losing to Kim Jon Un!”

Besides suffering from this political Madness, those who are proud to call themselves Liberals also have some sort of mental disorder that causes them to believe, and they truly do believe, that you can identify as any sex, any race, any ethnicity, Hell, that you can even identify as a hippopotamus on any given day and be something else tomorrow, but by God, don’t wear a Chinese dress to the Prom or you are a racist and a cultural appropriationist.  Can’t you Liberals see just how truly mental that is?

Smith is just one of the many reasons that I cut back on how much I watch FOX. I don’t know all the details of this deal and anyone who claims they do is a liar. If Smith said this deal needs time to come to fruition before we give Trump credit, I would agree, but he’s like the rest of the leftists, bash President Trump at all costs.  If Trump cured cancer tomorrow, he and the rest of the left would first claim he didn’t do it. Then they would say well, maybe he did, but the cure takes too long.

Then they would simply claim it was actually Barry ‘O’ who had actually cured the deadly disease and that President Trump had had nothing whatsoever to do with it. Here is what I do know about this deal. President Trump led from the front not the rear.  There were no plane load of cash used to buy his acceptance of the deal, but the left will never give credit where credit is due.  What we’ve got to remember is that the Left does not want the same things that the rest of us do.

Those on the left have openly expressed their disgust at American values and their love of, and respect for, Socialism/Communism.  They have openly wished for all kinds of hardships to befall the American public, so they can then blame it on their political opponents.  Our State-controlled media no longer employs reporters, not even pundits who express their own opinions, but pure propagandists. I doubt if Smith, or any of them in the media have the spine to be real, bona fide, journalists.

MORE CLAIMS OF NON-EXISTENT DEATH THREATS???

Have you ever noticed how it’s always those on left, in their effort to portray themselves as being the only truly civilized ones, always seek to underscore their nonsensical arguments by claiming that because of their willingness to speak out they are frequently made to be the target of death threats, and that these supposed death threats ALWAYS come from those of us on the right?  But oddly enough it’s more often than not that it’s just a short time later that word leaks out that the supposed victim is actually the perpetrator.  And rarely do such revelations make it into the headlines.  So it becomes much the same as the little boy who cried wolf.  More often than not these mythical death threats are nothing more than theatrics thrown in to make the story more ‘compelling’.  Such nonsense only serves to further reduce the credibility of those making the claims.  And it is in that department that most in the media are already sorely lacking.

Why I mention this is because ‘Fox News’ host Eboni K. Williams is now claiming to have received death threats after she criticized President Trump.  Williams harshly criticized Trump on Monday for his response to the violence in Charlottesville over the weekend, which she said was too soft on white nationalists.  Following that segment, Williams told Variety Magazine on Wednesday her inbox was inundated with death threats from people furious with her criticisms of the president.  Williams said the comments included things like: “I should meet my maker soon, I shouldn’t be allowed to walk the streets of New York.”  I’d be willing to bet that before long we’ll be finding out that either no death threats were ever actually made, or they came from Ms. Williams herself.  Either way, it’s likely nothing more than an attempt on her part to garner some sympathy for herself!  However, she is deserving of none.

My problem with Ms. Williams is that she harshly attacked Trump, when he was very clear that he did NOT support David Duke and his ilk.  However, she made no mention whatsoever of the BLM and especially the very vicious Antifa group, that showed up with ball bats and helmets.  This is the same vicious group that beat up Trump supporters who went to his rallies during the campaign.  I rarely if ever watch her, and there’s a reason for that.  And like so many on the left she typically does little more than to spew, ad nauseam, the Democrat Party talking points.  She’s becomes just one of the many reasons that I watch very little Fox News these days.  The network seems to be quite determined in its effort to become little more than a clone of the Crappy News Network (CNN) or MS’LSD’.  They’ve become nothing more than another bunch of NeverTrumpers and as such they’ve all become rather tiresome.

Maybe I’m just becoming cynical in my old age, because I’ve now gotten to the point where I take most things that I hear from those in the media with a rather sizable grain of salt.  I’ve spent the last seven months watching as President Trump has tried to make good on those things that got him elected only to see those in the state-controlled media, like Ms. Williams, as well as the many NeverTrumpers from within the president’s own party, do everything they could in their continuing effort to make that all but impossible.  The news media today has been reduced to little more than a bad SNL skit, and has become much less about presenting the ‘news’ and more about spewing pure leftwing propaganda or ‘fake news’.   Add to that how we’re now forced to contend with the many RINOs we have in Congress, those who are little more than eunuchs who would rather switch than fight, and it’s all become rather frustrating to say the least.