Waters 1

Since nearly the very second that Donald Trump was declared to be the winner of our last presidential contest, Maxine Waters, Democrat, has been in what can only be defined as being a constant attack mode and began calling for his impeachment after being in office for less than a week.  She hides behind her harsh criticism of the president by calling it “patriotic.”  But when the ridicule comes her way, she doesn’t take it too well.  Ridicule of the type she recently received after going to the House floor and declaring, “We fight against this president and we point out how dangerous he is. We’re fighting for democracy. We’re fighting for America.”

But the racist old bitty didn’t stop there.  Nope, she was on a roll by then and she was going to work it for as much as she could.  Because Waters went on to say, “We’re saying to those who say they’re patriotic, but they turn a blind eye to the destruction he is about to cause to this country.”  And then added, “You are not nearly as patriotic as we are.”  All I can say is that she must define ‘patriotism’ much differently than I do.  Because, quite frankly, after having been on this planet now for nearly 65 years I can’t say that I’ve ever actually encountered many genuinely patriotic Democrats, white or black.  Most Democrats hate this country.

So anyway, a clip of her rather imbecilic pronouncement from the House floor was recently played on Fox & Friends with Bill O’Reilly as a guest and he was asked to comment on her antics.  And he apparently started somewhat of a firestorm with his comments regarding Waters.  O’Reilly joked, saying, “I didn’t hear a word she said. I was looking at the James Brown wig.”  And it was then that resident airhead and Co-host Ainsley Earnhardt pushed back a bit, admonishing O’Reilly for attacking Waters’ appearance.  O’Reilly responded saying, “I didn’t say she wasn’t attractive.”  And then added, “I love James Brown, but it’s the same hair.”

But because everything is considered to be as offensive these days and jokes are no longer permitted, nor tolerated, O’Reilly has since faced the ire of liberals everywhere.  And as someone who professes to be a ‘tough guy’, O’Reilly demonstrated very little spine, as he quickly cowed to the political correctness and issued an apology.  He said, “As I have said many times, I respect Congresswoman Maxine Waters for being sincere in her beliefs. I said that again today on Fox & Friends calling her ‘old school.’ Unfortunately, I also made a jest about her hair which was dumb. I apologize.”  Personally, sometimes you just gotta call a spade, a spade.

But, as to be expected, Waters was not about to accept his apology, and, of course was quick to inject race into the discussion.  She Tweeted:  I am a strong black woman. I cannot be intimidated, and I’m not going anywhere.”  No, what she is is a pathetic racist.  She appeared later on MSNBC with Chris Hayes to thank Hitlery for standing up for black women.  And guess what else she did?  Ridiculed “right wingers” as “dishonorable people” and questioned O’Reilly’s credibility with a promise to “stick to the issues” — that is, right after she gets through slinging mud.  If anyone can be said to be lacking credibility it’s this boob, Waters.

Personally I don’t have a problem with criticizing her or any other scumbag Democrat.  What’s she gonna do about it?  She gonna get her ghetto minions to whoop me upside ‘da haid?   This hateful, ignorant, parasitic, racist, commie bitch of a scumbag has been haunting the halls of Congress for far too long.  She’s an embarrassment to this country.  In a better and more just world, she’d be the madam at some rural Alabama black cathouse.  Fortunately, she’s 78 years old, so we can only hope that in the not too distant future the good Lord will see fit to lock her heart up like a rusty chainsaw and then escort her to the gates of Hell.

And by the way, isn’t Maxine’s phony Caucasian hair style an example of cultural appropriation?  If she’s such a proud and strong black woman, shouldn’t she just go with the Angela Davis-style ‘Brillo Pad’ afro look?  Apparently not.  I’ve always thought it a bit curious that the blacks who tend to hold the most disdain for whites tend to spend a bigly amount of their time, effort, and money, trying to look white.  Why do you suppose that is?  I mean, why would you want to try to look like those who you profess to hate.  Because if we’re being honest here, the fact is that Blacks are some of most racist, hateful people you will ever meet.

As a side note here is my nomination for ‘Quote of the Year’: “In the midst of a national financial catastrophe, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) used her position as a senior member of Congress and member of the House Financial Services Committee to prevail upon Treasury officials to meet with OneUnited Bank. She never disclosed that her husband held stock in the bank. This outrageous conduct has led Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to include the congresswoman as one of the Most Corrupt Members of Congress.”  Now I’m criticizing the esteemed Ms. Waters, I’m simply repeating FACTUAL, and not fake, news.

I proudly served this great nation for 24 years in the U.S. Navy contributing to securing the freedoms for the American people.  I cannot, for the life of me, understand how such a horrible, moronic, anti-American, racist individual like Maxine Waters ever managed to get elected into public office.  Was it because there was no one else wanted the job?  She is a compete embarrassment and one of the most ignorant politicians I think I have ever heard.  Very shameful that someone like her is elected into a leadership position and is supposed to serve as a representative of the people.  Her district must be comprised of some very racist individuals.

And can someone, anyone, please explain something to me.  Why is it that all of these progressive leftists who want O’Reilly fired for his albeit rather silly and quite unfunny remarks had absolutely no problem when liberals like Bill Maher had some rather choice, as well as very disgusting, words for Sarah Palin?  Oh silly me, that’s right, when comments are made about conservatives, no matter how vile, despicable or hateful, and we’re told they need to be taken in the spirit in which they are given.  After all, liberals will ask, where’s your sense of humor?  To the progressive left, such remarks are considered offensive only when being directed at them.

Waters is one of those liberal Democrats, of which there are very many, who got to the top by riding the big city machine and never faced another challenge in an election.  Lucky for her she never had to demonstrate any signs of intellect, only a loyalty to the party line.  She hardly ever suffered any criticism because, of course, any criticism against her would be considered racist.  In her constant drumbeat of impeachment of Trump, she has yet to give a single solid reason why, other than she has somehow determined that he is not fit for office.  Her long tenure in Congress proves that the democratic process has some serious flaws.



Booker 1

If anyone were to still have any doubts about the weakness of the Democrat bench or the shallowness of the Democrat gene pool one need to hear no other news, fake or otherwise, that Corey Booker, the mayor who left Newark far worse off than he found it and then used the race card to finagle a seat in the U.S. Senate, easily tops the list of potential Democrat contenders for 2020.  Is that not the most hilarious thing you’ve ever heard?  Booker’s youth, as well as his popularity with the vocal progressive wing of the party, make the rumors easy to believe, but Booker himself was unwilling to address the speculation head-on until recently.

And it was in taking to the airwaves, courtesy of the Communist News Network’s “State of the Union,” that Booker refuted the rumors that he may be interested in running for president come the 2020 presidential election.  Booker said, “I think that we are doing — anybody in office is doing exactly what the American people are fed up and sick and tired of by talking about politics.”  And he went on to say, “Let’s talk about people and purpose now. I want to be authentic in who I am right now. I want to be a person of purpose not thinking about a future office.”  Anyone buying any of this bullshit?  Because if we’re being honest here, that’s really all it is!

Booker asserted that politicians who focus only on the next attainable office weren’t good politicians, before adding that such ambition usually forces someone to make compromises in their current office.  He said, “I am going to be fearless in telling the truth. I don’t care where it ends me up because I think when I go home to Newark, New Jersey, that’s what my community wants from me.”  Right, so old Corey is going to be fearless in telling the truth?  But the ‘truth’ by whose definition, I wonder?  Because this guy, like most Democrats, wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and bit him in the ass.  So it’s rather difficult, for me, to take this guy seriously.

And as if to reinforce the whole notion that the Democrat Party seems to have not only hit the bottom of the barrel, but has now proceeded to go right through the bottom of said barrel, regarding its number of suitable candidates for the office of president, we’re told that other top contenders for the Democrat nomination in 2020 include Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, and even former presidential candidate Hitlery herself.  Hitlery will be in her early 70s by then and likely even less appealing than she was in her late 60s.  Oh, and rumor also now has it that the crook from New York, Andy Cuomo, may decide to run.  Need I say more?

And it was during this same CNN interview that Booker accused President Trump of creating a “toxic environment” of “increased fear in our country.”  He said, “This is the problem, I don’t care what party you are in right now, recognize this, we are at a time of increased fear in our country.”  And why might that be, Mr. Booker?  Because any fear that I may possess has as its source you and nearly every other member of your pathetically corrupt party.  Because it’s you who want to allow into this country those who seek nothing more than to kill me or those who wish to take advantage of the generosity of the American people.  And for what, so they’ll vote for Democrats?

Booker said, “There is something seriously wrong when mendacity has become the norm. There is something seriously wrong when law-abiding citizens are afraid to leave their homes. There is something seriously wrong when hate crimes are surging. There is something seriously wrong when this is a toxic environment being created right now. And I don’t care who you are, if you consider yourself a leader, you have an obligation to stand up and do something about it and lead with love and not appealing to people’s darker angels or exploiting that fear.”  Like when a president throws open the jailhouse doors or pretends our borders don’t exist?

Personally, having already gone down that road once and having it result in what was nothing less than an unmitigated disaster, I’d like to think that the American people would have it in them the wisdom to NEVER AGAIN elect a black president!!  Thank you Barry “Almighty”, because not only did you destroy your own party but you have ruined any chance of a black man ever being elected president again.  If there was some way for Booker to become president he might even be worse and more corrupt than Barry “Almighty”.  For the sake of race relations in this country the very last thing we would need again, is another black Democrat as president.

And look, as far as a “toxic environment of increased fear”, the only fear President Trump is creating is the fear within a Democrat Party that’s bleeding voters due to its failures, its lies, its arrogance its corruption and its communist tendencies.  Theirs is a dying party and their over the top hateful rhetoric is a clear reflection of their panic.  Personally I feel much safer now than I did when Mr. “Overseas Contingency Operation” was in office.  His constant bending over and spreading ‘em for his then favorite non-enemy-enemy got to be more than a little unsettling.  After all, being a Democrat means never being able to say “Radical Islam”!

Booker’s idiotic claim of a “toxic environment of fear” reminds me of Barry’s eight years of incessant race baiting and race hustling. He convinced every black person they had to fear for their lives.  It’s how he eventually put a target on every cop’s back.  It was Barry who created the ‘environment of fear’.  Whites getting punched in the head for no reason when they were walking down the street, whites getting yelled at and accused of “white privilege”, whites getting screamed at in colleges, and now white students are being murdered at colleges.  Trump didn’t cause any of this, Barry did!  It was going on long before Trump took office.

Liberals never cease to amaze me.  Democrat politicians consistently work against the best interests of those constituencies that repeatedly vote for them over and over, much like the abused wife who constantly returns to her abuser.  Basically every word from Booker’s mouth is exactly what the liberals are all doing. The only ones freaking out and trying to scare everybody, is them!  They shouldn’t really call themselves “progressives” anymore, because what they are, are ‘RE-gressives’.  Because if you look at what were once classic liberal values, like freedom of speech, freedom to practice your religion, they don’t possess those values anymore.

That sounds much like the Moslem concept that if only ‘everyone’ would simply give in to Islam then there would be no more violence and no more problems. I can see why the progressives love Moslems now, they think exactly the same way.  So Booker’s idea is that if President Trump just stopped opposing the progressive, open borders, business destroying, identity politics juggernaut of the last 8 years then the fear progressives have of losing those same things would disappear.  I have news for the many snowflakes like Booker, all that President Trump needs to do is to simply ignore the progressives/regressives among us, and just do what he was elected to do.

Those who proudly wear the moniker of ‘progressive’, or if you prefer, RE-gressive, would never vote for Trump anyway so there’s simply no point in trying to appease them in any meaningful way.  In the end Trump’s administration will act like an intervention in their twisted lives and maybe some will wake up to themselves as happened in Reagan’s first term.  But there will always be a hardened core of liberal ‘malcontents’ who will always think the toxic civilization they have created these last few years is the only a viable model for this country going forward and that anyone who views things differently should never again be allowed a place at the table.

That Cory Booker could even be considering the possibility of maybe running for President in 2020 is nothing less than the most hilarious thing I think I have ever heard.  He has zero charisma, zero debating skills, and zero ideas except racism and identity politics.  In other words he’s another Hitlery, only in a darker, male form.  And if true, that he is at or near the top of potential Democrat contenders for 2020, then perhaps the Democrat Party is in far worse shape than we thought.  But that said, it’s as long as we have Republicans like McConnell, Ryan, McCain and Graham, to name just a few, we can never truly count out the Democrats.



As long as the black community continues to be so accepting of the traitors right there in their midst, any chance they may have, as a community, to move off the plantation where the Democrat Party has placed them, will never come to fruition.  And as has been said so many times before, until blacks stop believing all of the garbage about how they are nothing more than victims of a racist society, they will never, as a group, make any significant forward progress.  And once again it was one of those who remains so determined in his efforts to re-enforce the myth of black victimization who did so yet again, just this past Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” during a ‘discussion’ about our new president.  It was talk show host and Democrat stooge Tavis Smiley who said that he was troubled by “the rush to normalize” President Donald Trump’s “racist, sexist, classist campaign” and now the attempt at normalization of the Moslem ban.

Smiley said that what troubles him is that “we, too many of us, that is, rushed to normalize a racist, sexist, classist campaign that he ran to win this office. And now we seem to be rushing to normalize a Supreme Court process that trampled on the Constitution just a year ago. But now it’s just — so now we’re into this conversation about how should Democrats handle this. We’re normalizing this too fast. We’re normalizing a Muslim ban. We’re normalizing a religious test.”  He said, “And it troubles me, what this ultimately means for the future of this democracy if we continue in this town and beyond to normalize this kind of unrepentant behavior.”  Smiley continued by saying, “What I do want to say is that racism, sexism, classism, by any other definition is the consternation of someone’s humanity. And there are a whole lot of Americans who felt that during that campaign and are feeling it right now with the way we’re normalizing this kind of nonsensical behavior.”

If we can be honest here, Smiley is really nothing more than another one of those black “leaders” who do little more than whine incessantly about Trump, while at the same time saying, or doing, very little, if anything, about the black on black murder and crime in places like Chicago that takes place on a daily basis.  Smiley is as much a leader as is Al ‘Not So’ Sharpton, Jesse ‘The Extortionist’ Jackson, Van Jones, and any number of other babbling race baiters bilking the black community for everything they can get.  Smiley would rather legitimize Negro gangs, out of wedlock births, Negroes dropping out of school. Negro athletes assaulting their girlfriends than to seriously address any of the actual problems being faced by today’s black community. Blacks are twelve percent of the population and are responsible for most of the violent crimes committed in the inner city and most of the ignorance and stupidity that prevails in America.

I think most anyone who is even the least bit aware of the history of our political parties in this country is very much aware that it’s the Democrat Party that has a history of victimizing minorities, treating them as if they are less than human and lack sufficient intelligence to compete in life unassisted by government.  They are automatically labeled as victims at birth as if being stamped on their foreheads and repeatedly reminded of it throughout their lives by the left/Democrats as if that is all that life and the future holds for them.  Armed with the requisite “victim” and “racism” cards while at the same time being repeatedly told that “white privilege” is to blame for all of their troubles, they seek to move them to Democrat poverty plantations of welfare, food stamps, and disability where they will remain trapped in misery as part of the loyal Democrat base of voters.  And yet where’s the outrage from those like Mr. Smiley?

And dare I say that most people in this country have become sick and tired of a Democrat Party that consists of politicians, some of which, who have gone on to become the worst presidents we’ve ever been forced to contend with in this country.   Politicians who don’t know how to send an email and who don’t know when something is CLASSIFIED even when it’s marked classified and politicians who have gotten away with rape or even worse.  Politicians who have the habit of sympathizing with terrorists, letting criminals out of prison on a whim, and who are supported by a rather impressive propaganda machine comprised of CNN, the New York Times and a thousand other leftist media outlets, their smarmy TV comedians, washed-up has been Hollywood hags, ugly mobs of protesting demonstrators and their FAKE NEWS flooding the Internet. The Democrats have made themselves so nauseatingly obnoxious that they’re never going to win another election.

And its black individuals like Smiley who seek nothing more than to perpetuate, under President Trump, the setting back of race relations that was begun by Barry “Almighty”.  Far from caring about those blacks who are really in trouble, in places like the ghetto neighborhoods in Chicago, Smiley seems to go out of his way to exploit them for his own personal gain.  He’s a Neo-N-word, while President Trump has already reached out to fix black on black slaughter in Chicago.  The Smiley’s of the world, for hundreds of years, have been in the business of selling their own into slavery and misery, that’s simply who they are.  And no one knows that better than decent black people.  White people put Barry into office by voting for him in battle ground states, now those same people put Trump in office but all of a sudden they are being called racists and white supremacists?  The more the elites call them racists and uneducated, the more they abandon the Democratic Party.


Schumer 12

Isn’t it amazing how Democrats are rarely, if ever, confronted with their hypocrisy and how it is that our limp-wristed, politically-biased, state-controlled media continually allow them to get away with past statements.  And what I’m making particular reference to here are statements that have been made about the appointing of Supreme Court justices and how it “doesn’t matter” what Democrats may have said on this particular subject in the past.

Such is the case with, none other than, Chuckie Schumer and ‘Slow Joe’ Biden.  Schumer’s recent remarks refer to the Republican-controlled senate’s assertion that it will not, at least for now, consider Barry’s pick to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court but will, instead, wait until the next president is elected.  Several Democrats have already complained, even ‘demanded’, that the Republicans give Barry’s choice a hearing in their “advise and consent” role.

However past statements from both ‘Slow Joe’ Biden and Chuckie Schumer would seem to conflict with what we’re now hear coming from Democrats.  Statements that make it clear that these two hacks had no problem whatsoever with blocking Supreme Court nominees when the power structure was in their favor and the president making an appointment was a Republican.  But now because the shoe is now on the other foot, the whining about the injustice of it all is in full swing.

As I am quite sure you most likely have all heard by now, unless you’ve been living under a rock somewhere, how it was that back in 2007, how Chuckie was heard to say, “We should reverse the presumption of confirmation.”  And he would go on to say, “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”  But it’s ok to have Justice Scalia replaced by another Kagan?

And then we heard in 1992 how ‘Slow Joe’ Biden, then a Delaware senator and Chairman of the Judiciary Committee was heard to say, “It would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is underway — and it is — action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over.”  And ‘Slow Joe’ would go on to say, “That is what is fair to the nominee and essential to the process.”  So I guess what was fair then, isn’t fair today?

And it’s only after fast forwarding to 2016 that we now hear Schumer singing what is a different tune saying, “Look, the simple answer to this, which everyone is saying everywhere is, ‘Do your job.’ It doesn’t matter what anybody said in the past. Do your job. It’s working,” Schumer said. “We should do our job.”  So what’s he saying, that the Senate needs to do its job today, but back in 2007 it didn’t?  I’m sorry, but I’m so confused, but then I’m not an empty-headed Democrat.

As far as I’m concerned these videos, these blasts from the past, should now be placed on what is a continuous loop, playing over and over again, 24/7 from now and for at least the next 9 months.  Not that we’d be able to shame such consummate ideologues like Schumer, but simply because it’s such a wonderful opportunity to display their ultimate-hypocrisy and double-standards for all the world to see, from now all the way up to Election Day.

Of course the goal of the left, which should be obvious to all, is to put another activist on the bench to further destroy the Second Amendment and trash our God given rights. Congress and the Senate had better wait until next year or there will be Hell to pay.  And as expected ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid has begun making all manner of threats about bringing pressure to bear on the Republicans, so I suppose it’s only a matter of time before we have one more, on what is a long list of many, caves!



Now we all know, or should know, about all of the hoopla that has resulted from the Republicans putting forth their argument that it should be the next president, Democrat or Republican, who nominates a Supreme Court justice to replace Justice Scalia.  But how different things were in 1992 when, during a speech from the Senate floor, then Senator, ‘Slow Joe’ Biden said that President George H. W. Bush should wait until after the presidential election and let his successor fill any Supreme Court vacancy.  And yet, oddly enough, it’s this same rules that never seem to apply to Democrats.

It was June 25, 1992 when it was ‘Slow Joe’ who, from the floor of the Senate, was heard to say, “It is my view that if a Supreme Court Justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not – and not – name a nominee until after the November election is completed.”  So why is it then, do you suppose, that the actions of Barry’s predecessors is now considered as being nothing more than a guideline, of sorts, and has become suitable for ignoring?

‘Slow Joe’ would then go on to say, “If the president goes the way of Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until after the political campaign season is over.”  So if this was such a good idea then, why, suddenly, is it not such a good idea today?  Could it be because the most leftist president in our history, along with many members of his party, now see an opportunity to tilt the court very sharply to the left and, quite possibly, for decades?

As they say even a blind squirrel finds a nut once and awhile, and so it was in one of those very rare occasions where ‘Slow Joe’ has actually been known to make a certain amount of sense, that he said, “Others may fret that this approach would leave the court with only eight members for some time, but as I see it Mr. President, the cost of such a result – the need to reargue three or four cases that will divide the justices four-to-four are quite minor compared to the cost that a nominee, the president, the Senate and the nation would have to pay for what would assuredly be a bitter fight.”

But isn’t it amazing how it is that the rules are always made to change from when there is a Republican in the White House to when there is a Democrat occupying the Oval Office.  And I know it’s not just my imagination because I’ve seen it take place so often over the course of my life.  And granted, I know if it was currently the other way around the Republicans would be pushing for an appointment with the Democrats standing opposed.  But I think we can all agree that the Democrats could be counted upon to be much more resolute in their opposition than the Republicans are likely to be.