Hitlery 5

Well Hitlery may not have been elected President of the United States but, by golly, she’s about to become the recipient of what I’m quite sure she views as being the next best thing.  You see it has now been announced that Planned Parenthood will bestow one of their “great honors” upon Hitlery by giving her their “Champion of the Century” award.  You see, this the largest provider of abortions in the entire country will be celebrating its 100th birthday next month, even though they’ve deprived countless thousands of babies from ever seeing even one birthday.  Nevertheless, they’ll have a ghoulish gala the in ‘The Big Apple’ at which time they’ll give Hitlery the award “for her 40 years of service to women and girls in this country.”

But this is not the first award that Planned Parenthood has sit fit to honor our esteemed former First Lady and failed Democrat nominee for President with.  It was in 2009 that this very same group gave her the Margaret Sanger Award, which is, of course, named after its eugenicist founder.  And it was in accepting this award that Hitlery said, “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision.”  And Hitlery would go on to say, “I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life.”   What lessons? Sanger was a notorious racist who even spoke to the Ku Klux Klan in May 1926.  It was Paul Kengor who wrote that her speech in New Jersey to the KKK should be a red flag to liberals eager to praise her.

He said, “That alone would place any conservative or Republican directly in liberal hell, with no chance for redemption. But a progressive icon like Margaret Sanger? Hey, no problem: Launching Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion provider, is apparently suitable penance in the liberal church…. Sanger was a passionate racial-eugenicist with a crowning vision for what she openly called “race improvement.” The Planned Parenthood founder lamented America’s “race of degenerates.” The nation’s landscape needed to be purged of its “human weeds” and “the dead weight of human waste.” This included the “feeble-minded,” the “insane,” and the just plain “idiots.””

Odd that in a day and age when universities are purging themselves of all evidence of historic racism, Planned Parenthood is doubling down on their connection to this grisly founder. Aside from the KKK speech, another item is often cited by Sanger critics as evidence of her alleged racism and is something her admirers on the left feel compelled to defend.  In a December 10, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble of the Eugenics Society, in the context of discussing the Negro Project, which she developed in concert with white birth-control reformers, Sanger wrote: “We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Mr. Kengor continues: “Sanger shared the disparaging view of humanity held by another progressive icon, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who declared that “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Like Holmes, and, for that matter, like Adolf Hitler—who was an obviously more aggressive racial-eugenicist—Sanger hoped to finesse and refine the “gene pool.” She would do so not with gas chambers and concentration camps but with birth-control pills, eliminating human life before conception rather than after birth. Thus, her Planned Parenthood, which was originally called the American Birth Control League.”  Such is another hero of the left.

In addition to the Sanger Award and the “Champion of the Century” award, Planned Parenthood endorsed Hitlery and spent over $30 million to help her presidential campaign. If I were the head of Planned Parenthood, I might be asking for a refund instead of giving her more praise.  Look, pretty much the only difference between Hitlery and Sanger is that Hitlery believes in keeping unwanted children and pimping them out to pedophiles for donations to her “charities.”  Sanger just wanted to kill them.  The only thing Hitlery is a champion of is structuring, corruption, money laundering, and genocide of people all across the planet.  Take the low-life criminal back to the woods and bury it; the stench of it is overwhelming.


Hitlery 4

Just when you think it’s over, apparently, it is anything but.  And just when you wished it was over, it’s like a bad penny that Hitlery just keeps showing up.  And to be perfectly honest, what does it say about the state of a political party when the best it is that they will again have to offer, in what will be essentially 4 years from now, a very tired looking, and even more corrupt, 73 year old white woman as their candidate to be president?  I mean, really?  But then, having said that, when you stop to consider who else is currently being touted as potential candidates, old Hitlery might actually have a chance.  I mean look at who’s being mentioned; Elizabeth Warren, Andy Cuomo, perhaps Bernie Sanders and even Marty O’Malley?  But if a 69 year old Hitlery couldn’t properly inspire voters, how will a 73 year old version of the same model be able to?  But as long as Hitlery’s the biggest name out there, damaged goods or no, she’s gonna have people continuing to spread rumors of her return.

So it was then that in speaking to Greta Van Susteren, formerly of the Communist News Network (CNN) and of FOX News, on her new MSNBC program “For the Record with Greta”, that Robby Mook, Hitlery’s former campaign manager who did such a masterful job of, quite possibly, yanking defeat from the jaws of victory, wouldn’t deny that Hitlery might attempt yet another run for the presidency against Donald Trump in 2020.  Guess she intends to test that “three strikes and you’re out” rule.  The possibility of this inevitability occurred on St. Patrick’s Day in Scranton, Pennsylvania, when Hitlery made an appearance and joked, “I am ready to come out of the woods.”  A reference to the photos captured just two days after her election loss of her walking in the woods near her Chappaqua, New York, home.  Too bad she managed to find her way out.  I would have much preferred to have her out there wandering around for the rest of her life.

It was at this gathering that Hitlery would go on to say, “I am rethinking my strategy.”  And add, “The walk in the woods stuff didn’t work as well.”  Well no shit, maybe a better time to have ‘rethought’ her strategy would have before she implemented her ‘there’s-no-way-I-can-possibly-lose’ strategy.  And perhaps next time, if there is a next time, she’ll actually have a strategy, unless, of course, she’s been placed into the home by then.  Democrats might want to reconsider running a couple of 70+ year olds in 2020, now that Bernie is also making a lot of noise about running again, since it doesn’t really do all that much to inspire voters, especially younger voters.  What sort of free stuff will they be promising then that wasn’t already promised this time around?  It just all seems so very bizarre to me.  Personally if I was her age and had her money I’d set up a homestead on some nice quite Caribbean island and live out my days in peace and quiet with my grandkids.

And in what I guess was an attempt to go a bit deeper on the subject, Van Susteren probed Mook to speak for his former boss.  She asked, “What are the odds of her running again?”  Mook responded with a laugh saying, “I’m going to let her answer for that.”  But being ever the hardnosed journalist (NOT), Greta persisted asking, “Do you want to guess?”  Mook said, “I think what happens right now, we’ve got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, then we can start worrying about the next cycle.”  And he went on to say, “But we’ve got to make sure that this cannot happen again in two years or four years to anybody else.”  Mook accused Russia of interfering with the election saying, “Putin did not want her to become president.”  And too, there were all those folks in middle-America who just didn’t want her to be the next president either.  So, there is always that.  These guys have simply run out of excuses for Hitlery’s loss.  And yet…

I thought it funny when Mook said, “we’ve got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, then we can start worrying about the next cycle.” I’m guessing we can interpret that to mean: “We need to figure out what where we went wrong, what we left out of our repertoire of dirty tricks to steal the election.”  Getting to the bottom of what happened is easy.  Hitlery ran a horrible campaign!  That and the fact that the American people had had enough of the regressive, PC, socialist, liberal lunacy for eight years, and said they didn’t want another four years of white guilt shaming, being told we make too much money and we didn’t build that, pandering to racist blacks and Moslems and illegal aliens, higher taxes and adding another $10 Trillion to our deficit, getting screwed over by “tweeking” Obamacare, and in general the anti-American sentiment from our own politicians.  And that Democrats refuse to acknowledge that says far more about them than it does about Trump.

Ya know, this goes to show you just how utterly batsh!t-wackadoodle-crazy the Democrats truly are.  They just can’t bring themselves to accept the fact that not everyone, least of all the great many of the American people who still do love this country, buys into their leftist ideology and policies, and it seems to leave them at somewhat of a loss as to where they need to go from here.  All of these poor little snowflakes cried to Trump, “I can’t believe you may not accept the election results!”  Really?  And yet, here we are five months after the fact and you’d be hard-pressed to find a Democrat anywhere who accepts that Hitlery actually lost the election.  And if there truly is a God then there should be little or no chance that the deviant treasonous criminal that is Hitlery will ever be the president of these United States.  Perhaps she needs to look into one of the many countries she took money from and see if they are looking for someone like her to be their leader.

And finally all I can say is, when it comes to the prospects of yet another Hitlery candidacy, is, “Yes Hitlery, PLEASE run again.  Pretty please!”  Because in a way she’s the ideal candidate because she supports forcing her twisted progressive ideology upon our society.  And yet while she may remain the best the Democrats have to offer, the American people made clear, yet again, that she is not their choice for president.  And still she doesn’t seem to be able to take a hint.  And apparently even getting smacked upside the head with an electoral 2×4 didn’t get through to her.  You know, it’s just not that hard to figure out why Hitlery lost.  Which has me wondering if the Democrats really are so stupid as to be unable to figure it out.  I mean it really had nothing to do with any involvement by the Russians, and I would also argue that it had very little to do with WikiLeaks.  The truth is, she was a horrible candidate who ran an even worse campaign.  Frankly I think anyone could have beaten her.



Only after what can be, at best, described as a rather sketchy bit of questionable police work, by he who had been described by many as being nothing less than a modern-day version of Sherlock Holmes, was FBI director James Comey able to come to the unlikely conclusion that Hitlery had done nothing whatsoever that would warrant her facing any sort of prosecution.  And it is a testament to his skill as an investigator that he was able to reach that conclusion by neither placing Hitlery under oath nor by making sure there was a transcript made of the over three hours of questioning.  It’s no wonder he is in his current position of FBI director, right.

As someone looking in from the outside, I would argue that the director more closely resembled Inspector Clouseau as he appeared before the House Oversight Committee this past Thursday, where his testimony was seen as being important enough to place ‘him’ under oath.  It was then that he was provided with an opportunity to justify an unjustifiable decision not to recommend that Hitlery be prosecuted for her blatant, and purposeful mishandling of classified information.  There seemed to be little disagreement that she had done it, but it was apparently determined that she really didn’t mean to do it.  An excuse that works only for Democrats, or a Clinton.

But having said that, here are the seven key takeaways.

  1. Hitlery to be investigated for perjury. Committee chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) told Comey that given the facts he had presented, Hillary Clinton had clearly lied under oath to the Benghazi committee and would be referred for investigation.
  2. Hitlery gave classified information to people without security clearance. Chaffetz: “Did Hillary Clinton give non-cleared people access to classified information?” Comey: “Yes.” That included her email administrators and her lawyers.
  3. Hitlery had “intent” to break the law. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) confronted Comey with the overwhelming evidence that Clinton intended to break the law, contradicting Comey’s contention that there was insufficient evidence of Clinton’s intent.
  4. The FBI did not investigate whether Hitlery had lied to them. They interviewed her on Saturday without placing her under oath or recording the meeting, and Comey admitted he did not “parse” the record of her interview to see if she lied.
  5. Hitlery’s best defense is that she is too stupid and incompetent to have known better. Comey said that Clinton might not be “sophisticated” enough to tell when documents were classified — though members of the committee showed otherwise.
  6. Hitlery is probably still being investigated for corruption regarding the Clinton Foundation. Comey said that other investigations against Hitlery’s team had ended, but would not confirm or deny an ongoing probe into the Clinton Foundation.
  7. Democrats showed no interest in holding Hitlery accountable. Instead, they attacked Donald Trump, complained that the hearings were political, praised Comey for his integrity, and made false accusations of bias against the committee.

Oh, and let’s not forget how Hitlery mishandled human and signal intelligence on an unauthorized private server.  It was Rep Will Hurd (R-TX) who came out of left field and surprised everybody.  Mr. Hurd went after the mishandling of classified human and signal intelligence on a rogue unauthorized private server and others without security clearance had access.  It was a visibly angry Hurd who said, “I spent 9 1/2 years as an undercover officer in the CIA. I was the guy in the back alleys, collecting intelligence, passing it to lawmakers. I’ve seen my friends killed. I’ve seen assets put in harms way.”  And he then asked, “Does SAP include Humint and Sigint?”

Comey said that it was possible, but he couldn’t say in this setting.  Hurd said, “The Secretary of State had an unauthorized email server in her basement, those are your words.”  And then asked, “Who or what was protecting that server?”  To which Comey responded, “Not much.”  Hurd asked, “You don’t think this sends a message to other employees that if the former Secretary of State can have an unauthorized server in their basement that transmits top secret information… that’s not a problem?”  Comey answered saying, “There will be discipline from termination to reprimand–and everything in between–for people who mishandle classified information.”

Those unfamiliar with Comey were likely unaware, before this past week, that he’s your common household-variety political hack.  And when his testimony was over I’m sure he went back to his office and had a good laugh.  The events of this week which involved both Comey and Hitlery should come as no surprise.  After all, this isn’t the first time Comey has investigated the Clintons.  And in the past, and in each and every instance, he also found that there was never any wrong doing despite the fact that there was plenty of evidence that would have seemed to suggest otherwise.  Apparently it’s his job is to make sure nothing comes from Clinton investigations.

So, Mr. Comey can now be said to be 0 for 3 when it comes to the Clintons. Comey was part of the Whitewater Investigation, the Marc Rich investigation (Rich was a Clinton donor that was pardoned by Slick Willie), and now the Hitlery Email Investigation. Lots of investigations, but no convictions. Given his history with this pair, isn’t it a little suspicious that Hitlery’s FBI interview was neither taped nor transcribed?  Each investigation has ended with Comey’s “strong admonitions” of the Clinton’s; yet, despite allot of evidence of wrongdoing, no convictions. Is Comey so incompetent that he has let the Clinton’s evade justice for 20+ years?

And what really irritates me is hearing from so very many people about how this guy was supposed to be such an honorable man, that he would go wherever the facts lead him and not be swayed by the politics.  And it was all a bunch of bullshit.  Am I actually supposed to believe that they were all somehow completely oblivious to the rather checkered history between this ‘standup guy’ and the sleazy Clinton’s?  He’s either a shitty cop or one on the receiving end of some rather hefty payoffs.  The damage he has done to the image of the FBI may very well be irreparable.  And the sad thing is, I don’t think he even cares.  I know Hitlery and ‘Slick Willie’ don’t


Hitlery 20

Well it would seem that the still frontrunner and ‘presumed’ to be Democrat nominee for president, Hitlery, has yet another card, besides the much ballyhooed woman’s card, in her political deck, which she recently deployed while on the campaign trail.  And that card would of course be, the victim card.  Hitlery, in working to revive the dreaded and all-powerful vast right-wing conspiracy, recently reminded her supporters that the “right wing” is still very much alive and well, and is still working to destroy her, even after 25 years.

And so it was at a recent campaign event in Kentucky, Hitlery sought to blame all of her troubles on those who comprise the evil, and ever so sinister, right wing.  Much like Barry in that regard, it’s none of her problems that are ever to be considered as being of her own making.  There must always be someone to blame, because all that motivates those on the left are nothing but the purest of intentions.  After all, the only thing they are seeking is nothing more than a little fairness, and a little more acceptance for all.  And what’s wrong with that?

Hitlery said, “The right wing never gives up attacking me.”  And she went on to say, “I think they are really going to throw everything including the kitchen sink this time.”  So I guess it’s the fault of the ‘right-wing’ that Hitlery threatened to put coal companies and coalminers, who live and work in Kentucky, out of business.  Oh, and speaking of other things that are at Hitlery’s, we have the anti-Hitlery documentary film ‘Clinton Cash’ which will debut at the Cannes Film Festival on May 16.  I suppose it’s the evil right wing that’s behind that as well?

In referencing the attacks coming from the conspiratorial ‘right wing’, Hitlery was likely referring to attacks coming from Republicans surrounding her rather questionable e-mail and private server practices, as well as Trump’s decision to label her as “Crooked Hillary.”  Last week, Trump referred to Hitlery as “an unbelievably nasty, mean enabler.”  Hitlery told supporters that she was looking forward to debating Donald Trump in the presidential race.  She also criticized Trump for his comments about others.

Hitlery said, “We can’t be scapegoating, and finger-pointing and blaming, and demeaning and degrading and insulting our fellow Americans.”  And she added, “That is not what we are, and it’s time that we said ‘enough.’”  Yeah, right! So how about we ask some of ‘Slick Willie’s’ very many female victims about how well Hitlery practiced that line of bull!  Somehow, I think they’d disagree. Personally, I find it being nothing short of appalling that there are so women who can actually bring themselves to support such a vindictive bitch.

We the people have been the victims of the Bill and Hitlery crime syndicate; and, a formal criminal investigation by Barry’s FBI does not constitute a “right wing” attack. Travelgate, Filegate, Whitewater, Benghazigate, Servergate, Foundationgate, Uraniumgate, perjury while under oath to the Congress, and Vince Foster’s death…just the shortlist of Hillary’s crimes against the people of our nation. Voting for Hitlery is a criminal act in and of itself.  Hitlery has a long record of denigrating the women that the ‘Slickmeister’ sexually abused:

Juanita Broaddrick (AR) – rape

Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) – rape

Elizabeth Ward Gracen – rape – quid pro quo, post incident intimidation

Regina Hopper Blakely – “forced himself on her, biting, bruising her”

Kathleen Willey (WH) – sexual assault, intimidations, threats

Sandra Allen James (DC) – sexual assault

22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) – sexual assault

Kathy Bradshaw (AK) – sexual assault

Cristy Zercher – unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations

Paula Jones (AR) – unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault

Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault

1974 student at University of Arkansas – unwelcomed physical contact

1978-1980 – seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers

Monica Lewinsky – quid pro quo, post incident character assault

Gennifer Flowers – quid pro quo, post incident character assault

Dolly Kyle Browning – post incident character assault

Sally Perdue – post incident threats

All of which you would think would beg the question, why is it that so many women, regardless of political persuasion, continue to so enthusiastically support this Duplicitous old Bitch?  Does the ability to get an abortion ‘trump’ all else for them?  Is it more important than is the survival of the country?  If so, how f*cked up is that?  Apparently there are a lot of women who differ very little from most blacks when it comes to how they determine for whom to vote.  It would seem that the most important qualifier is either race or gender.  That’s just nuts!



Even before Barry “Almighty” was first elected president, his penchant for destroying all things fossil fuel-related has been obvious.  And since being elected, not once but twice, he has continued to use the bogus excuse of “manmade global warming” as a way of unleashing his rabid Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to, quite literally, go after the producers, and therefore the workers, involved in providing the energy that keeps this country moving and allows us to heat and cool our homes.  And now word comes that should Hitlery win election she fulling intends on picking up right where Barry leaves off, despite recently claiming she was taken out of context.

The fact that the United States has lost approximately 191,000 jobs in the mining industry just since September 2014, including approximately 7,000 that were lost in April, according to data published recently by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  The coal mining industry alone has lost approximately 10,900 jobs since April of last year.  That’s over 10,000 fathers and husbands who were trying to do nothing more than to provide for their families, that are no longer able to do so.  Apparently that matters very little to both Barry, who lives off the taxpayers and Hitlery, who gets paid huge speaking fees, two people who have very little trouble providing for THEIR families.

A recent statement released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics said, “Mining employment continued to decline in April (-7,000).”  “Since reaching a peak in September 2014, employment in mining has decreased by 191,000, with more than three-quarters of the loss in support activities for mining.”  In recent years, according to the BLS’s seasonally adjusted month-by-month historical employment numbers, mining employment in the United States peaked in September 2014, when there were 852,500 jobs in the industry.  In April, there were only 661,600 mining industry jobs in the United States, that’s a decline of 190,900 mining jobs in 19 months.

The BLS has month-by-month employment data in the mining industry going back to 1958. In the 58 years since then, mining employment has seen a series of peaks and troughs, hitting its all-time high in December 1981, and its most recent peak in September 2014. In December 1981, according to BLS’s seasonally adjusted number, there were 1,177,400 jobs in mining in the United States. That is 515,800 more than the 661,600 jobs in mining this April.  Employment in coal mining has been declining along with the overall mining industry. From April 2015 to April 2016, jobs in the coal mining industry declined from 67,500 to 56,600—a loss of 10,900 jobs in just one year.

BLS has seasonally adjusted month-by-month employment numbers in the coal mining industry going back to 1985.  In recent years, employment in the coal mining industry peaked in January 2012 at 89,800. Since then it has declined by 33,300 jobs to the current level of 56,600.  In the full period since 1985, employment in the coal mining industry peaked in April 1985 at 178,300 jobs. This April, there were 121,700 fewer jobs in the coal mining industry than there were in that April 31 years ago.  Like I said, Barry declared war on coal miners and since doing so he has set out to put as many of these people out of work that he possibly can.

And sadly for those in the coal business Hitlery has now promised to put even more out of work and to eventually win this war on coal that Barry started.  And for all those Democrats in all those coal producing states, I have but one question for you: How’s that Hope and Change workin’ for ya?  Oh, and by the way, maybe it’s time you start taking a long, hard look at your own Democrat members of Congress while you’re at it, and ask them just whose side they’re really on, their constituents or the Democrat Party?  And I hate to be the one to break the news here, but the Democrat Party is not now, nor has it ever been, on the side of the American worker.

Because what seems to be far more important to Democrats than keeping Americans working is the advancing of their myth of manmade ‘climate change’.  And it really matters not whether we’re talking those who work in the coal industry, the gas and oil industry, or even in the construction business as it relates to such things as the Keystone XL Pipeline.  Those jobs seen as being in any way related to fossil fuels, are automatically considered as being expendable.  So while solar and wind companies go bankrupt at record rates, America sits atop vast energy reserves in the form oil and coal, enough to last 150-250 years that Democrats just want to keep in the ground.


Hitlery 143

I think we can all agree on the fact that Hitlery has now become so desperate in her desire to re-occupy the White House that there is, quite literally, nothing the old girl won’t say to get back through the front door.  And it was very recently that we were all witness to yet another example of her doing just that when a teary-eyed West Virginia coal worker confronted the old bitch at a recent campaign event regarding the Democrat candidate’s promises to dismantle the coal industry.

And it was after apparently realizing she was in a tough spot that Hitlery very quickly offered up what she hoped would pass as being both a plausible explanation and a semi-apology to Bo Copley, a 39-year-old father who lost his job as a foreman in the struggling industry.  Hitlery made the claim that her anti-coal comments, which she had made at a town hall event back in March, had simply all been taken out totally out of context, but that was nothing more than yet another lie.

Anyone who had watched her at the time she was heard to say, “We’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business,” would know full well that there was nothing which was taken out of context.  So once again here we had Hitlery looking at this unemployed father, Mr. Copley, dead in the eye and telling him nothing but a lie.  It was all quite pathetic, really, and a little unnerving, the ease with which she was able to lie to this man.

Copley responded to Hitlery by saying, “I just want to know how you can say you’re going to put a lot of coal miners out of, out of jobs, and then come in here and tell us how you’re going to be our friend, because those people out there don’t see you as a friend.” In making his comment Mr. Copley was referring to the dozens of protesters who had gathered outside of the event and who had shouted at the candidate to “Go home!” as Hitlery arrived.

Hitlery, just like every other scumbag Democrat, has made it very clear that she intends to do all that she can, if elected, to eliminate the use of coal as an energy source, claiming that it contributes to that great leftist cause of climate change. Regulations that she and other Democrats support, as well as subsidies provided to other energy businesses, have already cut demand for coal and left the industry in shambles, leaving thousands of men like Mr. Copley unemployed.

Hitlery did her best to cover her tracks on the matter.  She said, “I don’t know how to explain it other than what I said was totally out of context for what I meant because I have been talking about helping coal country for a very long time.”  She added, “It was a misstatement because what I was saying is the way things are going now, they will continue to lose jobs. It didn’t mean that we were going to do it. What I said is that is going to happen unless we take action to help and prevent it.”

Hitlery continued, “I can’t take it back, and I certainly can’t get people who, for political reasons or personal reasons, very painful reasons, are upset with me. What I want you to know is I’m going to do everything I can to help, no matter what happens politically.”  And she went on to tell Mr. Copley, “I do feel a little bit sad and sorry that I gave folks the reason, or the excuse, to be so upset with me, because that is not what I intended at all.”

Hitlery said “I didn’t mean that we were going to do it, what I said was, that is going to happen unless we take action to try to and help and prevent it.”  And I can only assume that it was as a way to try to placate Mr. Copley that she also said that she has offered numerous proposals that she says are designed to help displaced coal industry workers.  But even though we are talking about folks in Democrat West Virginia, I think most would rather work.

And oddly enough Hitlery’s little confrontation with Mr. Copley came just a day after old ‘Slick Willie’ was heckled at a campaign event in the coal mining town of Logan. Protesters disrupted that event, and earlier in the week, the town’s mayor informed the campaign that it was not welcome because of the former first couple’s opposition to coal.  You have to wonder what these two seasoned politicians actually thought was going to happen under such circumstances.

She also said that as soon as she realized her comments were coming under fire, she called on fellow Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin.  According to Hitlery, “I said Joe, ‘I’m so upset about this,’ and I wrote him a letter, and told him that I was very sorry that that was occurring because he knows, and he has known me a long time as he said, he knows that that’s not at all what I was saying or what I meant.”  Sounds like Joe has little trouble lying to his constituents.

Look, once again the hating, cold-hearted Hitlery is simply lying to a victim.  Anybody who heard her enthusiastically announce they were going to end a lot of coal jobs KNOWS when she said it she was happy she was going to act on the global warming agenda. Hitlery celebrates destroying the economy and jobs for families and then lies right to the face of a poor man crying because he lost his job.  I don’t know how anybody can vote for the liar Hillary. She’s a disgrace.

In the end, Hitlery will sell out to whoever pays the most. She is just as likely to destroy coal as she is to support coal, depending on who gives her the most “donations”. Bernie on the other hand, is a true believer in all things communist.  He will shut down the energy supply that allows free market capitalism to work. Coal for starters.  All for “the common good”, of course. And just as in every communist hellhole, he would blame the resulting catastrophe on anything and everything but his policies.


Hitlery 113

Again, let me start by saying that I have not yet been convinced to jump onboard the ‘Trump Train’, however, but I must admit that am moving slowly toward the door of the train station that would make it possible.  And yes, I’m fully aware of Mr. Trump’s past transgressions, how could I not be, since those who profess themselves to be the guardians of conservativism have been nearly relentless in their effort to convince me that above all else I need to turn around before ever getting to the platform where I could, if so inclined, jump onboard the ‘T-Train’.  I am told that I must resist such temptation at all costs.

And also the purpose of what I am about to say here is not, in any way, some attempt, covert or otherwise, on my part to come rushing to the defense of ‘The Donald’ because, as we have seen on any number of previous occasions, he has demonstrated that he is more than capable of defending himself.  Trump’s most recent ‘controversy’, as you have most likely heard about by now, has to do with the fact that he dared to declare that Hitlery has but one card to play in her political deck, and that would be, of course, the “woman card.”  And she has shown little reluctance in playing it over and over and over again.

So it was then that after racking up victories in five primaries just this past Tuesday, Trump addressed a crowd of gleeful supporters and did what he does best and that was to unapologetically mock the living daylights out of Hitlery.  Trump said to his supporters, “Frankly, if Hillary Clinton were a man, I don’t think she’d get 5 percent of the vote. The only thing she’s got going is the women’s card.” He went on to say, “And the beautiful thing is, women don’t like her.”  And for the life of me I have to figure out why is it that any self-respecting woman would ever choose to vote for someone like Hitlery?  And yet…they do.

And it was then, early on Wednesday morning, that ‘Team Hitlery’ issued what I’m sure was something they thought was a rather pithy retort to Trump’s claim, releasing footage online of Hitlery embracing the “woman card” describing it as a fight for equal rights.  Hitlery said, “Mr. Trump accused me of playing the ‘woman card.’ Well if fighting for women’s health care and paid family leave and equal pay is playing the ‘woman card,’ then deal me in.'”  So says the ‘woman’ who did her very best to slander, in every way imaginable, those women who fell prey to her rapist husband. The ‘woman card’ in this case may be nothing but a Joker.

And true to form, Trump has not chosen to back down from his recent statements.  It was during a recent appearance on ‘Good Morning America’ that Trump was asked if he understood why some might find his statement sexist, and he made it quite clear that he had no apologies. He simply said, “It’s not sexist. It’s true. It’s just a very, very true statement. If she were a man, she’d get 5 percent. She’s a bad candidate. She’s a flawed candidate.” And he then went on to say, “She’s not going to do very well in the election, and I look forward to showing that.”  So while you could argue he was rather blunt, nothing he said was actually incorrect.

So I guess my question to all those who seem to now have their panties in a bunch would be, where exactly is it that Trump was wrong in saying what he said?  He’s quite right when he said that Hitlery is playing the “woman card”, and the fact is if she was a man she would have been long gone by now, having been easily dispatched by ‘Socialist Bernie.’  She gets a huge pass, from both women and the media, just for being a female, much like Barry got a huge pass for simply being (half) black.  With Hitlery it’s more about her BEING a woman than it is about her being FOR women, which, of course, she most certainly is not!

Hillary plays the “woman card” precisely for the reason that Trump said she does, because it makes her appear as being the “victim” of the evil white male. She wants to be the most powerful leader in the world, yet she hides behind the veil of victimization when it’s advantageous to her. “I am woman, hear me whine!  I just poormouth all the time” is her song.  Like I said, if Hitlery was a guy would she have long ago been vanquished by her competition even if that competition was no one other than Bernie because she’s just that bad of a candidate.  But because she’s a woman, she’s allowed to hang around and even be the ‘frontrunner’.

And you know, despite all of the idiotic claims being made by Democrats in general, and Hitlery specifically, the fact is that women do get paid the same as men for doing the same job. Unless of course they happen to work for Hitlery’s campaign or even in Barry’s White House.  However what Hitlery, and Bernie for that matter, conveniently leave out of the entire conversation on this particular issue is that women generally tend to choose lower paying jobs or part time employment and take longer time out of their careers for such things as having children.  Or when they do go into high paying jobs they tend to work fewer hours than men.

Women also don’t tend to go into those more dangerous, dirty, and labor intensive well-paying areas of employment. So there’s your wage gap.  Essentially, the bottom line here is that if you want to earn more than men then you’re just going to have man up a bit.  But nope, it’s just so much easier to sit around and whine about it.  That way, like all those mooches seeking a higher minimum wage, you can increase the odds of making more money without really having to work any harder or work more hours.  It’s the progressive way of doing things, more pay for less actual work. So it’s all about nothing.

If anything, Hitlery takes identity politics to, what can safely be said, a whole new level. The “woman card” is just a way for her to attempt to distract attention away from the numerous failures of her less than illustrious career.   After all, for all her years in ‘public service’ she has very little of substance to show for any of it.  And being a woman does not erase all of the scandals or having behaved like nothing more than a common crook.  It’s sad that elections are so often won because the candidates know that many voters just refuse to see beyond race or gender not beyond to “the content of one’s character.”

Lastly, and as kind of a side note, does anyone truly think that someone as unqualified as Barry “Almighty” would have ever been elected, let alone re-elected, if he had been a white guy?  And quite frankly, the ONLY thing that has prevented him for joining the ranks of Andrew Johnson and ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton, the other two impeached Democrat presidents, is the fact that he’s black.  I mean, how dare anyone even consider the possibility of impeaching the first black president whether or not he actually deserves to be?  So he’s been permitted to get away with some of the most egregious behavior ever to be committed by a U.S. president.