THE REAL REASON HITLERY LOST???

805

So the presidential election was held last November 8, and here we are rapidly approaching the 4th of July weekend and still we’re hearing excuses as to why she who was supposed to have won the election quite handily, actually ended up losing.  And it’s just when you thought you had heard every conceivable excuse imaginable, that one of the geniuses over at MS’LSD’ has come up with one that you would never have come up with on your own.  At least, speaking for myself, it’s never one that would have popped into my head, ever.  It was one of the ‘contributors’ at MS’LSD’, some loon by the name of Wendy Sherman, who said she believes that Hitlery may have lost the election because it was simply too hard for America to elect the first female president directly after electing the first black president.  But then being a vile, filthy, disgusting, lying, cheating, racist, rape enabling criminal married to a habitual rapist probably didn’t help her all that much either.

Sherman was on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival discussing modern political technology when she segued into the bizarre comment.  She said, “President Obama’s major mode of communication was the traditional one.”  And then she went on to say, “Big speeches, some of which were powerful and brilliant.”  She added, “And I hesitate to say, but I think it’s critical, looking out at our audience, looking out at most of us — that there is no doubt that we just had eight years of an African American president is not a factor in all that we are experiencing today.”  And she said, “When we make social change, when we make a decision to do something we have never done before, we then take two steps backward, at least. And I believe in my bones…that it was pretty hard to elect a woman after we elected the first African America president.”  Wow, that’s quite a theory she’s come up with.  Have you ever noticed how it’s the left that’s so preoccupied with gender and race?

And of course it’s those who are Hitlery’s more devoted followers who continue to make the claim that the Benghazi, email server, and Seth Rich ‘scandals’ were long ago thoroughly debunked.  And while maybe that’s the case for folks like Ms. Sherman, the truth is that none of those issues have been debunked.  They are, especially Seth Rich, still very much under investigation, including Benghazi!  Look, Hitlery lost because she had too many negatives, no positives, no solutions and no ideas.  These sad people simply refuse to admit that they had the worst possible candidate in modern electoral history.  If they had run almost anyone else they likely would have won.  It wasn’t the Russians or the deplorables, it was Hitlery.  She had no message, she is a lying crook with all the charisma of a USMC DI.  She allowed the consulate in Benghazi to be overrun and watched as four Americans, including our ambassador, died and yet she thought we still trusted her.

The Left in America simply can’t help themselves when it comes to identity politics. They refuse to look at results.  They refuse to see that Obummer oversaw a huge rise in Food Stamp participation, a doubling of our national debt, the lowest labor participation rate in over 40 years, wages that didn’t rise during his eight years, triple digit percentage increases in insurance premiums and deductibles, an open border policy that cost American lives, kow-towing to Moslem terrorists, apologizing for American exceptionalism, prioritizing non-citizens over citizens especially veterans and on and on.  The Left refuses to look at Obummer results and see failure so instead they have to blame race.  What many voters saw and understood was that Hitlery had every intention of continuing the failed policies that Obummer had put in place.  Her most important job, had she been elected, would be to put that final nail in the coffin of our Constitutional Republic.  Thankfully, she lost.

But I must admit that in one sense Ms. Sherman could be onto something.  A great many Americans did not like ex-president Obummer, but it wasn’t because of his race, it was because of his rabid ideology and the fact that he was blatantly anti-America, which he made quite clear even before he was elected by stating that if elected his intent was to “fundamentally transform” America.  And it was after watching Barry achieve some level of success in doing just that, that people chose to vote for President Trump.  And they did so not because of Hitlery’s gender or Barry’s race, what it came down to is the fact that there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between how both Hitlery and Barry viewed America.  Over the years it has become painfully obvious that neither are all that fond of America, at least as how it was conceived by ‘The Founders’.  So in a sense the electing of Barry may very well have had an adverse impact on the willingness of Americans to elect Hitlery.

And on a final note, I have long wished that those on our side, the Republican side, would play the political game a bit more like the Democrats play it.  And now that we have someone who does it’s become very apparent that the Democrats, their many minions in the state-controlled media, as well as more than a few of our wimpy RINOs, can’t quite handle it.  After all, they’re much more accustomed to watching our Republicans behave rather meekly as they simply sit there and take whatever it is that’s hurled at them with little or no response.  But now the Democrats find themselves in the position of being confronted by someone who does not just sit there and take it, he fights back.  And they don’t seem to be the least bit happy about it!  So as the president continues to fight back, we get to watch, with some level of enjoyment, as he continues to make liberal heads explode.  This is why many voted for him and why many will always support him.

HITLERY IS NOT YET READY TO LEAVE THE ‘SPOTLIGHT’…

Hitlery 12

And so it would seem that there is now a growing number of Democrats who are becoming more than a bit weary of Hitlery as their patience continues to wear a little thin when it comes to her litany of excuses for why she was unable to defeat a candidate that was supposed to be so easily dispatched.  And more than a few are becoming increasingly vocal when it comes to expressing their desire for her to step out of the limelight.  The consensus among former Hitlery aides, former Obummer aides, and Democrat strategists is that Hitlery’s remarks blaming the Democratic National Committee and others for her election loss are hurting both her image and the image of the Democrat Party.  When it comes to the image of the Democrat Party, Hitlery is far from the only one doing damage.  It was one longtime aide who recently said, “She’s apparently still really, really angry.  I mean, we all are. The election was stolen from her, and that’s how she feels.”  And this same aide went on to say, “But to go out there publicly again and again and talk about it?  And then blame the DNC? It’s not helpful to Democrats. It’s not helpful to the country, and I don’t think it’s helpful to her.”

Remember how it was back during the campaign when the Democrats and all those in the state-controlled media, were doing their damnedest to convince us all how it was that Hitlery was the greatest thing since sliced bread?  Well it would seem that the bread may have become more than just a bit moldy.  So word is that there are several Democrats who are reportedly encouraging the old girl to step out of the limelight. Which is ironic, really, since Americans representing 306 electoral votes, asked her to do just that last November.  They don’t catch on very quickly do they?  Apparently, they are only now coming to view Hitlery’s remarks blaming the DNC and others for her loss in November as damaging the image of the Democrat Party.  Actually, her excuses notwithstanding, she simply didn’t have enough loyalists able to steal it for her, like Obummer did, twice. That’s not the same thing as having the election stolen from her.  She just couldn’t get enough support to steal it from us, like her comrade. Hence, the absolute SHOCK she went through when she didn’t win. She truly thought she had it in the bag.  And that kind of confidence over something so important only comes from ‘knowing’ you’ll win, because you cheated.

Hitlery has now gone on-the-record blaming everyone from former FBI Director James Comey, to the Russians, the media, her primary and general election opponents, and even sexism for her election loss.  Some aides and strategists think the time has now come for her to retreat into the shadows and allow new ‘leaders’ in the party to step forward and into the spotlight.  In fact, it was a former Obummer aide who said, “If she is trying to come across as the leader of the angry movement of what happened in 2016, then she’s achieving it.”  And this same aide went on to say, “But part of the problem she had was she didn’t have a vision for the Democratic Party, and she needs to now take a break and let others come to the forefront.”  Despite those in the party calling on her to leave the public eye, Hitlery’s aides and advisers say she will likely remain in firmly in the public eye discussing the 2016 election as a way to promote her new book which will be released this fall.  Democrat strategist Jamal Simmons says that she should talk more about where she went wrong in the election as opposed to blaming others for her elections.  He said, “It would be nice to hear a little more about the things she did wrong, which I believe mattered more than what she has discussed.”

The time has long since passed for when both Hitlery and the Democrat Party should have been able to come to grips with the fact that the election was in no way stolen from them.  In truth I think the argument can be made that Hitlery and the party simply threw away any chance they had to win, by stubbornly choosing to allow psycho-sexual perverts into little girl’s bathrooms, the committing of numerous felonies that Hitlery was not charged with due to Lynch’s corruption, the secretly handing over of 400 Billion in cash to Iran, and enthusiastic embracing of the BLM thugs.  And all anyone had to do was to watch the rallies.  Trump would talk about defending our borders, the economy, job creating, and stopping ISIS for over an hour and 30 minutes, 3 states a day, 6 days a week.  Hitlery would have her half an hour speeches about nothing but what Trump said, how dare Trump say that, and can you believe what Trump said.  Nothing about policy, little about her plan to keep Americans safe, and no mention of ISIS or job creating.  And the only way she could come close to matching Trump’s rallies was to enlist her celebrity friends.  She was nothing but a political donor puppet.

When Obummer won the first time around, while I certainly didn’t like it, at the same time that I was neither surprised or shocked, and for any number of reasons, not the least of which was the fact that we had been stupid enough to nominate John McCain as our candidate.  But when Obummer won the second time I did feel a sickness in my stomach because after having watched him for the four years prior as he proved himself time and again to be nothing short of a disaster, I had hoped the American people would have had enough sense not to re-elect him.  But I was wrong.  Granted, once again we Republicans had managed to saddle ourselves with a less than stellar candidate in Mitt Romney, but even with that said, had Romney been a bit more aggressive, perhaps, dare I say, a bit more like Trump, I think he just might have been able to win.  And while I was less than thrilled by the outcome, I knew I had no option but to accept it.  And I certainly didn’t advocate for my favored candidate to form some sort of “resistance”, or for people to start taking to the streets calling for Obummer’s impeachment, despite the fact that it was easy to argue the point that he certainly deserved it.

In all of my 47 years as a registered voter I have never once seen the wisdom in voting for a Democrat and I feel quite confident in saying that I never will.  But to those who chose to come across the aisle and vote in support of America, I say thank you.  But then, like they say, even a crazy person will run out of a burning building.  And to those Democrats who had the courage to vote for candidate Trump, I say thank you for having principles and convictions to see through all of the garbage.  And to be able to recognize the fact that despite all their talk of tolerance and of being accepting and inclusive, Democrats are neither tolerant nor accepting.  They preach tolerance only of those things which they seek to force upon the rest of us and accept no differing opinion.  So this attempt to now try to distance themselves from Hitlery makes clear how it is that the Democrat Party has learned nothing from the stunning loss experienced by their candidate, because their problem goes much deeper than Hitlery.  And they shouldn’t count her leaving the spotlight until she’s ready to leave the spotlight.  And the Democrats have no one to blame but themselves, they alone are responsible for creating this political Frankenstein.

HITLERY EXTENDS HER BLAME GAME…

Hitlery 10

What is it, exactly, about Democrats from Al Gore to John Kerry-Heinz to Hitlery, that has them being so completely unable to comprehend why the American people simply did not want any of them as their president?  And then when after they have lost, the reason for that loss can ONLY be because their opponent was somehow able to cheat.  Now we all know that when it comes to political chicanery no one, and I mean no one, can hold a candle to the Democrats.  From the dead showing up and being allowed to vote, to ballots being found in the trunks of voting officials’ cars, over the years we have seen just about everything.

Which brings me to an increasingly bitter Hitlery who recently added yet another culprit to her apparently endless list of people and/or groups who she views as being responsible for her rather stunning 2016 election defeat.  That being, of course, the Democratic National Committee.  The failed presidential candidate, in a discussion Wednesday at the Code Conference in California, said that when she won the Democrat nomination she “inherited nothing” from the DNC.  She said, “I mean it was bankrupt, it was on the verge of insolvency, its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong. I had to inject money into it.”

She then went on to compare it to the Republican National Committee operation, which under then-RNC Chair Reince Priebus had bumped up its tech operation and had a multi-million dollar war chest behind it.  Hitlery went on to say, “So Trump becomes the nominee and he is basically handed this tried and true, effective foundation.”  Blaming the DNC marks an extension of the blame game in which Hitlery’s team engaged since within 24 hours of losing to President Trump in November.  And after all her railing against candidate Trump’s reluctance to accept the election outcome, who is it that has stubbornly refused to

Hitlery has repeatedly blamed FBI Director James Comey’s handling of the investigation into her private email server, as well as an alleged wide-ranging Russian-led conspiracy against her.  She has also blamed misogyny for her loss, as well as “voter suppression” in Wisconsin.  It was in a recent New York Magazine interview that Hitlery said, “I would have won had I not been subjected to the unprecedented attacks by [former FBI Director James] Comey and the Russians, aided and abetted by the suppression of the vote, particularly in Wisconsin.”  To say that she continues to live in denial would apparently be a gross understatement.

At the conference Wednesday, beyond the DNC, she repeated the Comey and Russia allegations, and also took an apparent swipe at voters — implying they weren’t interested in her “specific, costed plans” that allegedly were paid for.  She said, “I had this old-fashioned idea that it really mattered what I’d do as president.”  Well, it did really matter to many people what she’d do as president, that’s the primary reason she lost.  All we would have had, had Hitlery won, would have been a third Obama term, and millions of Americans understood that the country would never survive another four years that would likely resemble the last eight.

And when asked what her biggest mistake was in the campaign, she said it was her use of a private email server. However, she also accused what she called “the mainstream media” of covering her email scandal like Pearl Harbor and said that her email scandal was “a nothingburger.”  But she said it was exploited effectively and therefore she regrets doing it.  So she doesn’t regret the fact that our nation’s secrets were exposed to has now become, thanks to her, a rather lengthy list of enemies, only because it was able to be exploited during a political campaign.  That right there tells you all you need to know about Hitlery.

She also targeted what she referred as the ‘mainstream media’ for perhaps being too supportive, saying she was “a victim of the very broad assumption that I was going to win.”  Hitlery also blamed misogyny for her election defeat, saying of criticism of her: “At some point it bleeds into misogyny.”  She called it “maddening” that she is not able to get as angry publicly as male politicians.  One of the hosts seemed to notice Hitlery’s blame game, and remarked: “You seem as mad as ever.”  But Hitlery again could not bring herself to accept responsibility in any meaningful way, despite some of her clunky answers giving an insight into why she lost.

So I ask ask you, throughout the entire history of the United States, and in the entire history of world politics, has there ever been another person to go on and on about the myriad of reasons why they lost an election?  Especially seven months after the election?   It’s just all so pathetic, so Hitlery, and so very Democrat Party.  Accepting defeat with grace and dignity sure as Hell is not something that Democrat are able to do.  With each passing day with each new excuse and new claim of being a victim of “others”, she only serve to make a bigger ass of herself and looks even more pathetic. She is quite the piece of work. Thank God she lost.

And how is it that she can claim to have inherited “nothing”?  Really?  I guess that would be nothing except, you know, a nationwide (and often times, global) network of media companies and personalities, academics, A-list Hollywood and Music industry celebrities and other cultural movers and shakers promoting her 24/7, as well as ‘journalists’ meeting with her at quiet dinners against the ethics of their profession, as well as an Obama Administration lying to FISA courts to gain access to info on political opponents for political reasons.  I guess if you don’t count all if that then, yes, Hitlery did inherit absolutely nothing.

Is she also claiming that Bernie supporters weren’t organized and enthusiastic, that they weren’t actively campaigning for him or is that disclosure about DNC incompetence her way of admitting that the DNC was working against him and now she’s playing both sides?  Also, used “her own money?”  What did she think, that all those foreign plutocrats were just giving her money because they thought she was so, darned lovely?  No, those random chunks of cash were given to try to get her into power so they could use her to get whatever they wanted from the USA.  This woman has less introspective and self-awareness than a gnat.  My apologies to gnats.

So let’s recap the many reasons why Hitlery say she lost to Donald J. Trump:

1)  The DNC was broke.

2)  She wasn’t allowed to get mad.

3)  Her use of a private email server.

4)  The media talked about her server.

5)  The media supported her too much.

6)  Wisconsin requires an ID to vote.

7)  She got paid for speeches.

8)  Comey, Comey, Comey.

9)  Hacking of her server, which is new info.

10) Hacking of DNC by Russia, who were too dumb to use the info, so they called Kushner.

11) And the Russians…

Now she’s pointing her finger at the DNC itself, saying that they were near bankrupt and offered little if any help.  But isn’t this the same DNC that brazenly colluded with Hitlery’s campaign and the press?  The press which submitted stories that were either pro-Hitlery and/or anti-everyone else for proofing prior to being sent to press?  Isn’t this the same DNC that Debbie Wizzerman Shultz worked hand in hand with Hitlery to the detriment of Bernie Sanders?  Isn’t this the same DNC that was a well-tuned, well-oiled political machine throughout the eight years of Obummer?  Yet somehow it went from being a well-tuned and well-oiled machine to near bankruptcy?

Never has one person more responsible for her own defeat, been so reluctant to accept any blame and so quick to blame others for that defeat than Hitlery.  She had folks on the ground in traditionally Red states asking why they were there, and folks in traditionally Blue states asking where’s the help that we need?  Her campaign had no message for voters other than that they were bigots, racists, sexists, a homophobes, Islamaphobic, or a deplorable and that we just need to accept men dressing as women, women dressing as men and each in the other’s bathroom.  No wonder so many didn’t vote for her, no wonder at all.

Hitlery demonstrates every time she speaks about the election, that she has continued to learn nothing.  Did she get hacked?  Sure.  But she and the DNC are only crying foul over it because it was a hack against their party, her campaign.  Had it been the GOP and/or Trump who had been hacked I’m sure they’d be singing a very different tune.  Overseas forces and influences?  Well apparently it was okay when folks in Israel and select other middle-eastern countries helped Obama with calling Americans to get the vote out.  Sexism, misogyny, bigotry and whatever else.  We’ve heard it all before Hitlery, and we still don’t believe you.

HITLERY WINS THE NEXT BEST THING???

Hitlery 5

Well Hitlery may not have been elected President of the United States but, by golly, she’s about to become the recipient of what I’m quite sure she views as being the next best thing.  You see it has now been announced that Planned Parenthood will bestow one of their “great honors” upon Hitlery by giving her their “Champion of the Century” award.  You see, this the largest provider of abortions in the entire country will be celebrating its 100th birthday next month, even though they’ve deprived countless thousands of babies from ever seeing even one birthday.  Nevertheless, they’ll have a ghoulish gala the in ‘The Big Apple’ at which time they’ll give Hitlery the award “for her 40 years of service to women and girls in this country.”

But this is not the first award that Planned Parenthood has sit fit to honor our esteemed former First Lady and failed Democrat nominee for President with.  It was in 2009 that this very same group gave her the Margaret Sanger Award, which is, of course, named after its eugenicist founder.  And it was in accepting this award that Hitlery said, “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision.”  And Hitlery would go on to say, “I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life.”   What lessons? Sanger was a notorious racist who even spoke to the Ku Klux Klan in May 1926.  It was Paul Kengor who wrote that her speech in New Jersey to the KKK should be a red flag to liberals eager to praise her.

He said, “That alone would place any conservative or Republican directly in liberal hell, with no chance for redemption. But a progressive icon like Margaret Sanger? Hey, no problem: Launching Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion provider, is apparently suitable penance in the liberal church…. Sanger was a passionate racial-eugenicist with a crowning vision for what she openly called “race improvement.” The Planned Parenthood founder lamented America’s “race of degenerates.” The nation’s landscape needed to be purged of its “human weeds” and “the dead weight of human waste.” This included the “feeble-minded,” the “insane,” and the just plain “idiots.””

Odd that in a day and age when universities are purging themselves of all evidence of historic racism, Planned Parenthood is doubling down on their connection to this grisly founder. Aside from the KKK speech, another item is often cited by Sanger critics as evidence of her alleged racism and is something her admirers on the left feel compelled to defend.  In a December 10, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble of the Eugenics Society, in the context of discussing the Negro Project, which she developed in concert with white birth-control reformers, Sanger wrote: “We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Mr. Kengor continues: “Sanger shared the disparaging view of humanity held by another progressive icon, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who declared that “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Like Holmes, and, for that matter, like Adolf Hitler—who was an obviously more aggressive racial-eugenicist—Sanger hoped to finesse and refine the “gene pool.” She would do so not with gas chambers and concentration camps but with birth-control pills, eliminating human life before conception rather than after birth. Thus, her Planned Parenthood, which was originally called the American Birth Control League.”  Such is another hero of the left.

In addition to the Sanger Award and the “Champion of the Century” award, Planned Parenthood endorsed Hitlery and spent over $30 million to help her presidential campaign. If I were the head of Planned Parenthood, I might be asking for a refund instead of giving her more praise.  Look, pretty much the only difference between Hitlery and Sanger is that Hitlery believes in keeping unwanted children and pimping them out to pedophiles for donations to her “charities.”  Sanger just wanted to kill them.  The only thing Hitlery is a champion of is structuring, corruption, money laundering, and genocide of people all across the planet.  Take the low-life criminal back to the woods and bury it; the stench of it is overwhelming.

HITLERY CLINTON, IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED…

Hitlery 4

Just when you think it’s over, apparently, it is anything but.  And just when you wished it was over, it’s like a bad penny that Hitlery just keeps showing up.  And to be perfectly honest, what does it say about the state of a political party when the best it is that they will again have to offer, in what will be essentially 4 years from now, a very tired looking, and even more corrupt, 73 year old white woman as their candidate to be president?  I mean, really?  But then, having said that, when you stop to consider who else is currently being touted as potential candidates, old Hitlery might actually have a chance.  I mean look at who’s being mentioned; Elizabeth Warren, Andy Cuomo, perhaps Bernie Sanders and even Marty O’Malley?  But if a 69 year old Hitlery couldn’t properly inspire voters, how will a 73 year old version of the same model be able to?  But as long as Hitlery’s the biggest name out there, damaged goods or no, she’s gonna have people continuing to spread rumors of her return.

So it was then that in speaking to Greta Van Susteren, formerly of the Communist News Network (CNN) and of FOX News, on her new MSNBC program “For the Record with Greta”, that Robby Mook, Hitlery’s former campaign manager who did such a masterful job of, quite possibly, yanking defeat from the jaws of victory, wouldn’t deny that Hitlery might attempt yet another run for the presidency against Donald Trump in 2020.  Guess she intends to test that “three strikes and you’re out” rule.  The possibility of this inevitability occurred on St. Patrick’s Day in Scranton, Pennsylvania, when Hitlery made an appearance and joked, “I am ready to come out of the woods.”  A reference to the photos captured just two days after her election loss of her walking in the woods near her Chappaqua, New York, home.  Too bad she managed to find her way out.  I would have much preferred to have her out there wandering around for the rest of her life.

It was at this gathering that Hitlery would go on to say, “I am rethinking my strategy.”  And add, “The walk in the woods stuff didn’t work as well.”  Well no shit, maybe a better time to have ‘rethought’ her strategy would have before she implemented her ‘there’s-no-way-I-can-possibly-lose’ strategy.  And perhaps next time, if there is a next time, she’ll actually have a strategy, unless, of course, she’s been placed into the home by then.  Democrats might want to reconsider running a couple of 70+ year olds in 2020, now that Bernie is also making a lot of noise about running again, since it doesn’t really do all that much to inspire voters, especially younger voters.  What sort of free stuff will they be promising then that wasn’t already promised this time around?  It just all seems so very bizarre to me.  Personally if I was her age and had her money I’d set up a homestead on some nice quite Caribbean island and live out my days in peace and quiet with my grandkids.

And in what I guess was an attempt to go a bit deeper on the subject, Van Susteren probed Mook to speak for his former boss.  She asked, “What are the odds of her running again?”  Mook responded with a laugh saying, “I’m going to let her answer for that.”  But being ever the hardnosed journalist (NOT), Greta persisted asking, “Do you want to guess?”  Mook said, “I think what happens right now, we’ve got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, then we can start worrying about the next cycle.”  And he went on to say, “But we’ve got to make sure that this cannot happen again in two years or four years to anybody else.”  Mook accused Russia of interfering with the election saying, “Putin did not want her to become president.”  And too, there were all those folks in middle-America who just didn’t want her to be the next president either.  So, there is always that.  These guys have simply run out of excuses for Hitlery’s loss.  And yet…

I thought it funny when Mook said, “we’ve got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, then we can start worrying about the next cycle.” I’m guessing we can interpret that to mean: “We need to figure out what where we went wrong, what we left out of our repertoire of dirty tricks to steal the election.”  Getting to the bottom of what happened is easy.  Hitlery ran a horrible campaign!  That and the fact that the American people had had enough of the regressive, PC, socialist, liberal lunacy for eight years, and said they didn’t want another four years of white guilt shaming, being told we make too much money and we didn’t build that, pandering to racist blacks and Moslems and illegal aliens, higher taxes and adding another $10 Trillion to our deficit, getting screwed over by “tweeking” Obamacare, and in general the anti-American sentiment from our own politicians.  And that Democrats refuse to acknowledge that says far more about them than it does about Trump.

Ya know, this goes to show you just how utterly batsh!t-wackadoodle-crazy the Democrats truly are.  They just can’t bring themselves to accept the fact that not everyone, least of all the great many of the American people who still do love this country, buys into their leftist ideology and policies, and it seems to leave them at somewhat of a loss as to where they need to go from here.  All of these poor little snowflakes cried to Trump, “I can’t believe you may not accept the election results!”  Really?  And yet, here we are five months after the fact and you’d be hard-pressed to find a Democrat anywhere who accepts that Hitlery actually lost the election.  And if there truly is a God then there should be little or no chance that the deviant treasonous criminal that is Hitlery will ever be the president of these United States.  Perhaps she needs to look into one of the many countries she took money from and see if they are looking for someone like her to be their leader.

And finally all I can say is, when it comes to the prospects of yet another Hitlery candidacy, is, “Yes Hitlery, PLEASE run again.  Pretty please!”  Because in a way she’s the ideal candidate because she supports forcing her twisted progressive ideology upon our society.  And yet while she may remain the best the Democrats have to offer, the American people made clear, yet again, that she is not their choice for president.  And still she doesn’t seem to be able to take a hint.  And apparently even getting smacked upside the head with an electoral 2×4 didn’t get through to her.  You know, it’s just not that hard to figure out why Hitlery lost.  Which has me wondering if the Democrats really are so stupid as to be unable to figure it out.  I mean it really had nothing to do with any involvement by the Russians, and I would also argue that it had very little to do with WikiLeaks.  The truth is, she was a horrible candidate who ran an even worse campaign.  Frankly I think anyone could have beaten her.

JAMES COMEY, DISHONEST OR SIMPLY INCOMPETENT???

601

Only after what can be, at best, described as a rather sketchy bit of questionable police work, by he who had been described by many as being nothing less than a modern-day version of Sherlock Holmes, was FBI director James Comey able to come to the unlikely conclusion that Hitlery had done nothing whatsoever that would warrant her facing any sort of prosecution.  And it is a testament to his skill as an investigator that he was able to reach that conclusion by neither placing Hitlery under oath nor by making sure there was a transcript made of the over three hours of questioning.  It’s no wonder he is in his current position of FBI director, right.

As someone looking in from the outside, I would argue that the director more closely resembled Inspector Clouseau as he appeared before the House Oversight Committee this past Thursday, where his testimony was seen as being important enough to place ‘him’ under oath.  It was then that he was provided with an opportunity to justify an unjustifiable decision not to recommend that Hitlery be prosecuted for her blatant, and purposeful mishandling of classified information.  There seemed to be little disagreement that she had done it, but it was apparently determined that she really didn’t mean to do it.  An excuse that works only for Democrats, or a Clinton.

But having said that, here are the seven key takeaways.

  1. Hitlery to be investigated for perjury. Committee chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) told Comey that given the facts he had presented, Hillary Clinton had clearly lied under oath to the Benghazi committee and would be referred for investigation.
  2. Hitlery gave classified information to people without security clearance. Chaffetz: “Did Hillary Clinton give non-cleared people access to classified information?” Comey: “Yes.” That included her email administrators and her lawyers.
  3. Hitlery had “intent” to break the law. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) confronted Comey with the overwhelming evidence that Clinton intended to break the law, contradicting Comey’s contention that there was insufficient evidence of Clinton’s intent.
  4. The FBI did not investigate whether Hitlery had lied to them. They interviewed her on Saturday without placing her under oath or recording the meeting, and Comey admitted he did not “parse” the record of her interview to see if she lied.
  5. Hitlery’s best defense is that she is too stupid and incompetent to have known better. Comey said that Clinton might not be “sophisticated” enough to tell when documents were classified — though members of the committee showed otherwise.
  6. Hitlery is probably still being investigated for corruption regarding the Clinton Foundation. Comey said that other investigations against Hitlery’s team had ended, but would not confirm or deny an ongoing probe into the Clinton Foundation.
  7. Democrats showed no interest in holding Hitlery accountable. Instead, they attacked Donald Trump, complained that the hearings were political, praised Comey for his integrity, and made false accusations of bias against the committee.

Oh, and let’s not forget how Hitlery mishandled human and signal intelligence on an unauthorized private server.  It was Rep Will Hurd (R-TX) who came out of left field and surprised everybody.  Mr. Hurd went after the mishandling of classified human and signal intelligence on a rogue unauthorized private server and others without security clearance had access.  It was a visibly angry Hurd who said, “I spent 9 1/2 years as an undercover officer in the CIA. I was the guy in the back alleys, collecting intelligence, passing it to lawmakers. I’ve seen my friends killed. I’ve seen assets put in harms way.”  And he then asked, “Does SAP include Humint and Sigint?”

Comey said that it was possible, but he couldn’t say in this setting.  Hurd said, “The Secretary of State had an unauthorized email server in her basement, those are your words.”  And then asked, “Who or what was protecting that server?”  To which Comey responded, “Not much.”  Hurd asked, “You don’t think this sends a message to other employees that if the former Secretary of State can have an unauthorized server in their basement that transmits top secret information… that’s not a problem?”  Comey answered saying, “There will be discipline from termination to reprimand–and everything in between–for people who mishandle classified information.”

Those unfamiliar with Comey were likely unaware, before this past week, that he’s your common household-variety political hack.  And when his testimony was over I’m sure he went back to his office and had a good laugh.  The events of this week which involved both Comey and Hitlery should come as no surprise.  After all, this isn’t the first time Comey has investigated the Clintons.  And in the past, and in each and every instance, he also found that there was never any wrong doing despite the fact that there was plenty of evidence that would have seemed to suggest otherwise.  Apparently it’s his job is to make sure nothing comes from Clinton investigations.

So, Mr. Comey can now be said to be 0 for 3 when it comes to the Clintons. Comey was part of the Whitewater Investigation, the Marc Rich investigation (Rich was a Clinton donor that was pardoned by Slick Willie), and now the Hitlery Email Investigation. Lots of investigations, but no convictions. Given his history with this pair, isn’t it a little suspicious that Hitlery’s FBI interview was neither taped nor transcribed?  Each investigation has ended with Comey’s “strong admonitions” of the Clinton’s; yet, despite allot of evidence of wrongdoing, no convictions. Is Comey so incompetent that he has let the Clinton’s evade justice for 20+ years?

And what really irritates me is hearing from so very many people about how this guy was supposed to be such an honorable man, that he would go wherever the facts lead him and not be swayed by the politics.  And it was all a bunch of bullshit.  Am I actually supposed to believe that they were all somehow completely oblivious to the rather checkered history between this ‘standup guy’ and the sleazy Clinton’s?  He’s either a shitty cop or one on the receiving end of some rather hefty payoffs.  The damage he has done to the image of the FBI may very well be irreparable.  And the sad thing is, I don’t think he even cares.  I know Hitlery and ‘Slick Willie’ don’t

HITLERY PLAYS THE VICTIM…

Hitlery 20

Well it would seem that the still frontrunner and ‘presumed’ to be Democrat nominee for president, Hitlery, has yet another card, besides the much ballyhooed woman’s card, in her political deck, which she recently deployed while on the campaign trail.  And that card would of course be, the victim card.  Hitlery, in working to revive the dreaded and all-powerful vast right-wing conspiracy, recently reminded her supporters that the “right wing” is still very much alive and well, and is still working to destroy her, even after 25 years.

And so it was at a recent campaign event in Kentucky, Hitlery sought to blame all of her troubles on those who comprise the evil, and ever so sinister, right wing.  Much like Barry in that regard, it’s none of her problems that are ever to be considered as being of her own making.  There must always be someone to blame, because all that motivates those on the left are nothing but the purest of intentions.  After all, the only thing they are seeking is nothing more than a little fairness, and a little more acceptance for all.  And what’s wrong with that?

Hitlery said, “The right wing never gives up attacking me.”  And she went on to say, “I think they are really going to throw everything including the kitchen sink this time.”  So I guess it’s the fault of the ‘right-wing’ that Hitlery threatened to put coal companies and coalminers, who live and work in Kentucky, out of business.  Oh, and speaking of other things that are at Hitlery’s, we have the anti-Hitlery documentary film ‘Clinton Cash’ which will debut at the Cannes Film Festival on May 16.  I suppose it’s the evil right wing that’s behind that as well?

In referencing the attacks coming from the conspiratorial ‘right wing’, Hitlery was likely referring to attacks coming from Republicans surrounding her rather questionable e-mail and private server practices, as well as Trump’s decision to label her as “Crooked Hillary.”  Last week, Trump referred to Hitlery as “an unbelievably nasty, mean enabler.”  Hitlery told supporters that she was looking forward to debating Donald Trump in the presidential race.  She also criticized Trump for his comments about others.

Hitlery said, “We can’t be scapegoating, and finger-pointing and blaming, and demeaning and degrading and insulting our fellow Americans.”  And she added, “That is not what we are, and it’s time that we said ‘enough.’”  Yeah, right! So how about we ask some of ‘Slick Willie’s’ very many female victims about how well Hitlery practiced that line of bull!  Somehow, I think they’d disagree. Personally, I find it being nothing short of appalling that there are so women who can actually bring themselves to support such a vindictive bitch.

We the people have been the victims of the Bill and Hitlery crime syndicate; and, a formal criminal investigation by Barry’s FBI does not constitute a “right wing” attack. Travelgate, Filegate, Whitewater, Benghazigate, Servergate, Foundationgate, Uraniumgate, perjury while under oath to the Congress, and Vince Foster’s death…just the shortlist of Hillary’s crimes against the people of our nation. Voting for Hitlery is a criminal act in and of itself.  Hitlery has a long record of denigrating the women that the ‘Slickmeister’ sexually abused:

Juanita Broaddrick (AR) – rape

Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) – rape

Elizabeth Ward Gracen – rape – quid pro quo, post incident intimidation

Regina Hopper Blakely – “forced himself on her, biting, bruising her”

Kathleen Willey (WH) – sexual assault, intimidations, threats

Sandra Allen James (DC) – sexual assault

22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) – sexual assault

Kathy Bradshaw (AK) – sexual assault

Cristy Zercher – unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations

Paula Jones (AR) – unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault

Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault

1974 student at University of Arkansas – unwelcomed physical contact

1978-1980 – seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers

Monica Lewinsky – quid pro quo, post incident character assault

Gennifer Flowers – quid pro quo, post incident character assault

Dolly Kyle Browning – post incident character assault

Sally Perdue – post incident threats

All of which you would think would beg the question, why is it that so many women, regardless of political persuasion, continue to so enthusiastically support this Duplicitous old Bitch?  Does the ability to get an abortion ‘trump’ all else for them?  Is it more important than is the survival of the country?  If so, how f*cked up is that?  Apparently there are a lot of women who differ very little from most blacks when it comes to how they determine for whom to vote.  It would seem that the most important qualifier is either race or gender.  That’s just nuts!