Despite the continuing Democrat fairytale currently being perpetuated by just about everyone involved in the ‘fake news’ media and EVERY Democrat, including Hitlery herself, regarding how President Trump is something of a stooge for Vlad Putin, can we please put all of the nonsense aside and agree that Russia could have achieved its objectives, far more easily and at much less cost, if it had been Hitlery who was elected president and not Donald Trump.

And let’s face it, you’d have to be a complete moron, or a hardcore Democrat hack, not to realize that autocrats, dictators, and warlords everywhere were absolutely salivating over the prospects of a Hitlery presidency. They very much favored, even preferred, the far more malleable Hitlery instead of the nationalistic and assertive Donald Trump who campaigned on, and then adopted, a far more aggressive “America first” leadership approach to defense and foreign policy.

That point is even more compelling, given President Trump’s more uncompromising U.S. policy with regard to Russia.  And it was likely during the president’s first year in office that Russia first felt the consequences of a more assertive United States.  Because, as you may remember, it was in November 2017 that the U.S. approved the $10.5-billion sale of Patriot anti-missile systems to NATO ally Poland to counter then perceived Russian aggression.

And then it was in December that the U.S. authorized the transfer of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to help that nation defend against Russian-backed separatists.  U.S. troop presence in Eastern Europe was increased over Obama-era levels to bolster European defenses, while the U.S. imposed monetary sanctions targeting individual Russian actors and companies.  Further, the Trump administration persisted in convincing U.S. NATO allies to increase their defense spending.

And so it would seem to be rather obvious, at least to me, that Russia would fondly remember Barry ‘O’s less than impressive secretary of state.  Her inane “reset button” set the tone.  Old Vlad had surveyed the Hitlery of Benghazi infamy and noted the facilitation of the transfer of large uranium assets to Russia.  The U.S. obliged the Kremlin by removing missile defense systems from Central Europe and never did more than complain about Crimea’s annexation.

And then there was Barry’s fuzzy line-in-the-sand indecisiveness over Syrian chemical weapons that made way for Russia’s effective military intervention in Syria.  And Vlad surely approved of Barry’s concessions to Iran on the nuclear ‘deal,’ and it was Barry who had once told former Russian president Medvedev that Vlad should give him more “space” because after his election he would “have more flexibility.”  Barry had given Vlad a peak at what a Hitlery presidency might be like.

And it was in Hitlery that Russia (read Putin) saw a candidate far more interested in globalists’ demands from Paris, Katowice, and Davos than on the truly tough issues like global proxy wars, Russian revanchism, nuclear proliferation, and NATO solidarity.  Given the world’s pre-election political and media consensus, a Hitlery victory was almost assuredly a given inside the Kremlin.  Just as it was here at home among those in ‘fake news’ and especially, the Democrat Party.

And so Vlad was likely just as surprised as CNN to wake up that November morning in 2016 to learn that the “impossible” had in fact happened.  Look I don’t think anyone can deny that there was some level of Russian interference in the 2016 election.  But at the same time one must admit that there was no organized scheme of coordination or dreaded “collusion” with the Trump campaign.  There was nothing to be gained by doing so as Hitlery was Russia’s preferred candidate, hands down!

So why was it that Russia would choose to interfere?  Well, I would think that obvious, to sow discord and acrimony among the political parties and voters to undermine American government, society, and leadership.  And can we all at least agree on the fact that U.S. competitors and adversaries would love nothing better than to see, above all else, America fiscally exhaust ourselves on social programs instead of on national defense and security.  Or is that obvious just to me?

After eight long years of Barry ‘O’ Vlad had every reason to think that the U.S. was far more interested in Davos, Paris, and climate change than in any Russian adventurism.  And so Vlad & Co. sought to further breakdown of societal mores and law and order and to take a certain amount of pleasure in watching Americans further divided by identity politics, bathroom protocols, and political animus.  And there are many who seem more than willing to fall for that, hook, line and sinker.

With Russian, along with interference from any number of other sinister players in the 2016 presidential election, one person was ultimately responsible for this nation’s defense and security as “Commander-in-Chief.”  And of course that was Barack Hussein Obama.  And yet with full knowledge of what was determined organized foreign interference, he ultimately failed in oath-sworn responsibilities to keep the nation’s democratic processes secure and free from that interference.

The fact is that it was in Hitlery that the Russians had someone who could very easily be bought, and they knew it.  But none of this even begins to cover Hitlery’s most despicable crimes. With her use of an unsecured email server handling highly classified State Department correspondence, she left the door wide open for Russia, China, and most likely N. Korea and Iran to infiltrate every part of the U.S. government, perhaps even our military.  She is obnoxiously corrupt!

This is treason, and espionage, and not just once or twice, but thousands of times. Every time she sent or received something from the White House, she left open the door for that system to be breached as well.  The Russians knew this. The Chinese also knew.  And given her willingness, even eagerness to accept bribes and kickbacks through her ‘Foundation’, it’s conceivable, even highly likely, that she might even have sold access to one or both.  Nothing would surprise me.

And it was Vlad who ‘invested’ $145 Million into the Clinton slush fund and $1.2M for a 60 minute speech.  So why would he have decided to do that?  Because he knew how easily the Clinton’s and any number of other top Democrats could be bought off by China, so why would he want someone who doesn’t need Russia’s or China’s money? To normal, thinking people it made no sense. Only to those who fear the jig is up and their useful idiots believed something so delusional.

And we haven’t even touched on the direction that President Trump has now taken U.S. energy production, which is another huge reason Vlad would have much rather dealt with a President Hitlery.  Because there is absolutely no doubt that Hitlery would have favored a continuation of Barry ‘O’s ongoing war on fossil fuel development in the U.S. as opposed to a President Trump who had promised to reduce regulations and to fast track pipeline approvals.

Russia’s economy is extremely dependent on gas and oil exports so the last thing Vlad would want is increased U.S. production putting downward pressure on global energy prices.  Why do you think Russia, and other oil producing adversaries, donate millions to American environmental organizations?  The notion that Vlad favored Trump over Hillary is ludicrous yet it’s generally accepted as fact even still.  Vlad couldn’t dream of any more feckless dupes than Barry and Hitlery.


Hitlery 25

If I happened to be someone in the hierarchy of the Democrat Party, or someone described as possessing a little ‘pull’, I think I’d be having a much needed conversation with Hitlery.  And it would be during that discussion that she would be provided with two options; either she go away quietly and enjoy her remaining years in quite seclusion, or become one of those unsolved mysteries.  And the reason I say that is because it was this past Monday at Georgetown University during a panel discussion on women and human rights, that failed Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery again just could not resist bringing up her humiliating defeat by Donald Trump, once again claiming that it was a combination of misogyny caused by globalization anxiety and “old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women.”

But the continuing insanity exhibited by this woman seems to know no bounds.  Because another message she seemed to think important enough to bring up, was that not only is climate change real and important, it’s also very sexist.  She said, “I would say that particularly for women, you’re absolutely right, they will bear the brunt of looking for the food, looking for the firewood, looking for the place to migrate to when all of the grass is finally gone as the desertification moves south and you have to keep moving your livestock for your crops are no longer growing, they’re burning up in the intense heat that we’re now seeing reported across North Africa, into the Middle East, and into India.”  And she added, “So yes, women once again, will be the primary…primarily burdened with the problems of climate change.”

And as I said, it was at this event that Hitlery complained of the sexism and misogyny she believed influenced Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.  When asked about a backlash against women’s rights, Hitlery said, “I see it as a reaction that is driven by lots of different motives, some of them having to do with people feeling insecure, frightened, disappointed, discouraged—name whatever emotion you want—about their lives and the ongoing globalization of the economy, which is leaving many people out. And we haven’t seen anything yet. Wait until robotics and AI, artificial intelligence really takes off. So when people are insecure and anxious, they often defend against their own feeling by rejecting others. That often happens with minorities. It happens with ethnicities, races, religion and it also happens with respect to women.”

Hitlery continued, “Any of you who have read my book about what happened know that I think misogyny and sexism was part of that campaign. It was one of the contributing factors, and some of it was old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women, and certainly the equality of women’s leadership, and some of it was an outgrowth of all this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on people and leading them in a hunt for scapegoats.”  So on and on it goes.  Hitlery refuses to accept any responsibility whatsoever for running what has to be considered as being one of the worst campaigns in recent political history.  She simply cannot bring herself to admit that she so thought she had it in the bag and could therefore simply coast on to victory.  But something funny happened on the way to inauguration day.

And with all that said, I could have sworn that MS(LSD) and the Crappy News Network (CNN) told me that the real reason Hitlery lost was because the Russians placed two nuclear submarines off each coast, one near New York the other near San Francisco, that sat just off shore on election night broadcasting mind manipulation messages to each voter: “Vote Trump. Vote Trump. Hitlery bad. Trump good” No? Oh, wait, I’m sorry, that theory is so 2017!  It was aliens!  Oh, wait, that was debunked at Christmas.  Ah, it must have been the complete disgust and distrust of Barry and Hitlery and their corrupt FBI goon squad along with the threat of four more years of open borders, amnesty, a failing economy, closing factories, jobs moving overseas, and general American decline.  That’s it, that’s why she lost to President Trump.

Hitlery will NEVER give this up, it is the lodestone of her entire existence, back to when she was a teenager.  A father who never gave her the respect she thought she deserved, a political marriage to an out-of-control womanizer, who repeatedly embarrassed her publicly, these were what set her on her way to ‘Leftist Fascism’, the only solution to her heartfelt misandry.  Even the men who obsequiously obeyed her were merely tools to assuage her megalomania.  Do not expect her to ever reflect upon herself, and the demons that would destroy her carefully constructed self-image.  The ongoing good news for America is that the hag wakes up with the reality she will never be president. This woman has lost whatever was left of her mind!  Desertification?  Women left to search for food and firewood?  Moving livestock?

But you know, if it was me who had gotten my ass handed to me by someone I was so confident in being able to defeat, I seriously doubt that I would still be talking about it 15 months later.  I guess I don’t quite understand what it is that Hitlery thinks she has to gain by continuing to harp on the fact that she lost to guy who nearly everyone on her side thought she was going to beat and pretty handily so.  But for whatever the reason she simply refuses to let it go.  If she hasn’t by this time been able to convince enough folks that she was somehow robbed of her rightful place as president, how much longer is her whining going to go on?  And at what point are more Democrats going to start telling her enough is enough and to just give it a rest, a long rest?  But as has always been the case, it’s all about her, not about the party.


Hitlery 23

So here we are more than a year after our last presidential election and still Hitlery seems to be still in search of a reason on which she can hang her humiliating defeat.  To the point where she is now pointing a rather boney finger at, where else but, the eight years of former ex-president Obummer as the reason she couldn’t campaign on an “agenda of change” and conceivably win the 2016 election.  This despite the fact that Obummer actively campaigned for her throughout the 2016 campaign.

It was during an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt earlier this week that Hitlery bemoaned being seen as an extension of the Obummer years.  Hitlery told Hewitt, “It is true that when you run to succeed a two-term president of your own party, you have a historical headwind blowing against you.”  And she went on to say, “It’s not just this campaign can be set apart from everything that’s ever happened in our politics. It is a challenge.”

And Hitlery also suggested her campaign suffered from mixed messaging.  She said, “If you are both the candidate defending a lot of the areas of agreement, but also putting forth an agenda for change, which is what I tried to do, it is often difficult to get the second part of that message through.”  Is that what she was trying to do?  Because while I must admit that I didn’t pay that much attention to her campaign, what I did see of it, there were few, if any, areas where she differed from Obummer.

Not that she really wanted to distance herself from Obummer.  Hitlery said, “I was proud to serve in the Obama administration. I did not agree with everything that President Obama decided, but on balance, I really think he did what had to be done to rescue the economy, which as we all remember, was in desperate straits.”  People heard this coming from her and looked back at eight years of anemic economic growth and an $10 Trillion increase in the national debt and said no way, no Hitlery.

Despite her misgivings about messaging, Hitlery says she continues to have a “high regard for the campaign that we put together, and all of the people who were working in it so hard.”  Hitlery continued to differentiate her campaign from that of Donald Trump, whom she described as “the first reality TV candidate,” while she insisted she was “for better or worse, the candidate of reality.”  Ok, but whose reality?  Hitlery was set to continue policies that had been proven not to work.

And it was during the same interview that Hitlery said she was “very much worried by the actions and rhetoric” of President Donald Trump.  She said, “I don’t have any personal stake in this presidency. I have a citizen’s stake. I have a concerned person’s stake. And I am, as you might guess, very much worried by the actions and rhetoric of our current president. And so I was cordial with him before we ran against each other. He supported me when I ran for the Senate in New York.”

She said, “And then he began to traffic in all kinds of conspiracies like the birther conspiracy, and you know, then making all kinds of outrageous and untrue attacks on immigrants and others, and really being an equal opportunity insulter. I really did hope, and as I said in my concession speech, which I talk about in the book, I said we all need to give him a chance. And we all need to support our president. We have one president at a time. And I’ve been very disappointed in the way that he has conducted himself.”  This coming from the woman married to ‘Slick Willy?”

Hewitt asked, “After this is all done, do you see becoming friendly with him again?”  And Hitlery responded by saying, “I don’t know the answer to that question, Hugh. I think that you know, his attacks on so many of the concerns that I’ve always had, I’ll give you just a quick example, I was involved in the bipartisan program called the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Ted Kennedy, Orrin Hatch, I mean real, you know, real Republican-Democratic cooperation at the end of the 90s.”

She continued by saying, “My husband signed it into law in a Republican Congress, and George W. Bush continued it. Barack Obama and a Republican Congress continued it. And it takes care of 9 million kids whose families, you know, are too well off, even though they are working families for Medicaid, and they don’t have insurance under an employer that covers the very expensive costs of caring for kids with chronic, congenital, traumatic conditions.”

And she added, “Okay, so I don’t think a word has been said by the current president, and certainly the Congress has failed to reauthorize it. So at the end of this year, right around Christmas, 9 million kids and their families are going to start being told they no longer have health insurance for cystic fibrosis, for diabetes, for cancer, whatever it might be. I don’t understand that, Hugh. I don’t get it. And so it’s not just personal with, you know, threats against me and all that stuff that goes on.”

And she concluded by saying, “It’s really a values issue for me, because you know, I do think we’re put on this Earth in large measure to try to help take care of each other. And we can do that in smart ways, and I’ve always tried to be on the smart side of that. But you know, to walk away from caring for kids, I just don’t understand it.”  I hate to be the one to break it to her, but her ‘values’ are not the ‘values’ of most Americans.  And when has she ever been on the smart side of anything?

Look, Hitlery had 90% of the state-controlled media actively promoting her despite knowing what a terrible candidate she actually was.  And at the same time they were busy promoting her they were doing all that they could to tear down her opponent.  And add to that the fact that Hitlery, quite literally, had all of Hollyweird in her corner as well.  And she also had most of academia in her corner, we now know that she literally owned the DNC, and still, even with all that she couldn’t win.

And it wasn’t because she was a woman. It was because the majority of those who actually vote in election didn’t believe her to be trustworthy and she confirmed their distrust by keeping a private email server and lying about it.  She lost because she called 50% of the voting public “deplorable.”  She lost because she’s a hypocrite, championing women’s rights and then trashing/threatening the women your husband harassed and abused. You lost because her political positions shift with the wind.

But most of all, she lost because, while Donald Trump was talking about the economy and jobs, all she was talking about was Donald Trump.  And as we saw, a “He’s worse than me” strategy wasn’t really an effective campaign strategy.  If it had been it would now be President Hitlery and not President Trump.  Anyone who happened to catch any of her campaign speeches knew long before the election, regardless of what all the polls were supposedly telling us, that Hitlery was toast.

But I suppose, to a limited extent, hers is a legitimate complaint.  The biggest part of Obummer’s legacy is the election of Donald Trump.  It was Obummer, as much as it was Hitlery, that the voters were voting against.  Future elections may see a recurring pattern of “We will Vote for: No Democrats, No Liberals, No East-Coast Snobs, No Left-Coast Marxists.”  Eight years of Obummer taught many Americans some serious lessons about Progressivism.  Hence Democrat desire to keep our borders open.

It was about her loss that Hitlery said, “Hack, hack, what difference, at this point, does it make?  I’ve been suffering from PTSD ever since the snipers were shooting at me as I disembarked the helicopter, I am not able to handle the various technological devices I have, I misplaced my server, when I found it I needed to wipe it, like with a cloth.  And I’ve had to deal with so many bimbo eruptions I could puke!  This is all part of the vast, right wing conspiracy and it’s not my fault, hack, wheeze, I lost!”

And remember it was Hitlery who did her college thesis on her hero Saul Alinsky. For those of you who have never heard of Alinsky, he wrote “Rules for Radicals”. It’s a ‘how to’ for anarchists that gives them ‘rules’ that will aid them in overthrowing the USA.  Alinsky was a socialist who wanted to undermine and overthrow America in order to fundamentally transform America’s capitalist order and change it to communism.  Hitlery’s entire ‘career’ has been based on the overthrow of America.



There were more than a few times over the course of the last years when it was difficult to determine, at least for me, just who it was that represented the greater danger to this country.  Whether it was our leftist ideologue of a president, Barry “Almighty”, and his socialist policies or our congressional Republicans who frequently seemed to be afflicted with some malady that caused their spines to have all the consistency of jello preventing them from putting up any significant road blocks in an effort to at least slow Barry’s progressivism.  Hell, it was more often than not that they seemed to be only too happy to hand over to Barry everything he wanted.

So it wasn’t really all that surprising to hear, on this past Sunday’s “Face the Nation,” on the Communist Broadcasting System (CBS) and during a discussion on President Donald Trump’s inaugural address calling for his policy to be informed by putting “America first,” Sen. Lindsey Graham say, “I don’t know what America first means.”  Graham said, “To the president, if America first is a throwback to the 20’sand 30’s isolationism when it was first used as a phrase, the world would deteriorate even quicker, if it is a new way of Ronald Reagan’s peace through strength I would like to work with him. I don’t know what America first means.”  And he’s a U.S. Senator?

While I guess I can at least can appreciate his honesty, I’m not sure what it might be that confuses him.  Let me spell it out for him since he seems to be a little slow on the up-take.  Any and all decisions, whether made by the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, or by Judicial Branch of our government, should be made for the benefit of the American people and result in the strengthening of America.  That starts with getting back to our basic Constitutional fundamentals.  You remember what the Constitution is, don’tcha Lindsey?  I was just wondering because you were not much more than a spectator as Barry did his best to shred it, for eight years.

As for trade deals, it means if it doesn’t benefit the American economy and the American worker, then it’s to be dropped in the toilet and flushed.  Which is what also needs to be done to pathetic RINOs such as yourself.  Sadly, I’ve never been able to figure out why it is that the people of South Carolina continue to send this boob back to the Senate?   The man is so absolutely CLUELESS, to the point where if you were to look ‘clueless’ up in the dictionary you’d likely see his picture.  And while we’re stuck with this moron until 2020 I hope it’s then that folks in South Carolina will see the wisdom in perhaps giving someone else a chance.  Preferably a real conservative.

So in an effort to enlighten Senator Graham as well as his many RINO colleagues, what follows here is a bit of a tutorial regarding an understanding of what America First means:

Step 1 —

  1. Begin by looking at a map of the world.
  2. Next, locate the country where you were born and raised or adopted via a legal immigration process.
  3. Note internally that since this is your country, you always put its interests first and foremost, particularly if you are elected to represent your fellow citizens in a legislative body or are elected as the leader of their country.

Step 2 —

  1. Read your country’s Founding documents, and commit yourself to honor those principles, and not the ideals of those lands thousands of miles away.
  2. Remember: no matter how much money you, personally, may come to acquire, when the citizens of a state/country elect you, they expect you to advocate for policies that benefit their economic and security interests, not the interests of global elites or the workers/citizens of other countries, whether they reside in dictatorships or democracies, as they have their own leaders to stand up for their interests.
  3. Learn by understanding the opposite of an America First approach: an America-last politician who represents the interests of other countries, at the expense of the citizens of their own country.

So I guess what I’m hoping for here is that this may help, just a little, those who, like the good senator from South Carolina, seem more than a little confused about what ‘putting America first’ actually means.  And does Graham really not understand what it means to put America first?  Because if that’s true I find it more than just a little scary.  And the fact that he’s admitting such a thing should make painfully clear that there seems to be very little difference between people like Graham and most, if not all, of the Democrats in Congress.  Democrats never seek to put America first, America is always painted as the villain.  Graham needs to decide whose side he’s on.



I doubt that even if he had tried Barry could not have come up with a more fitting end to what has been, without a doubt, the single most disastrous presidency in the history of our country.  And of course what I’m speaking about is how as his last major act as president, Barry “Almighty” somehow saw fit to cut short the sentences of over 300 convicted drug dealers.  But you know, I can’t think of a better way to sum up the last 8 years of having this racist thug in the White House.  The move brings Barry’s bid to correct what he’s repeatedly called a systematic injustice, to a climactic close.  But on the bright side, at least we’re finally rid of him.

His final batch of commutations is the most any U.S. president has ever issued in a single day.  And it’s the culmination of a second-term effort to remedy consequences of decades of onerous sentencing requirements that according to Barry, put tens of thousands of drug offenders behind bars for too long.  Barry’s justification for doing so is his claim that he has repeatedly called on Congress to act, but lawmakers refused.  And it’s the crimes that will most assuredly be committed by those recently released that will, going forward, come to be Barry’s true legacy, and sadly it will be the one part of his legacy that President Trump will be unable to turn back.

With this his final offer of clemency, Barry brought his total number of commutations granted to 1,715, which is more than any other president in U.S. history.  During his presidency Barry “Almighty” ordered free 568 inmates who had been sentenced to life in prison.  And it was Neil Eggleston, Barry’s White House counsel, who said, “He wanted to do it. He wanted the opportunity to look at as many as he could to provide relief.”  And he added, “He saw the injustice of the sentences that were imposed in many situations, and he has a strong view that people deserve a second chance.”   No, this was all about bowing to his leftist supporters and not much else.

For Barry, it was the last time that he would have the opportunity to use his presidential powers to stick his finger in the eye of those who love this country, and who believe in law and order.  Because at noon today, President-elect Donald Trump was sworn in as President, finally bringing Barry’s dark and sinister chapter in American history to an end.  And as has typically been the case with Barry, and more times than I care to count, he chose to act unilaterally, and as he saw fit.  And I have no doubt that his bizarre penchant for releasing convicted criminals back onto our streets will likely come to leave an indelible mark upon our country.

And apparently we’re supposed to believe that Barry actually took the time to personally review the case of each and every inmate who received a commutation, often, or so we are told, poring over case files in the evenings or calling his attorneys into his office to discuss specifics.  Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates said the administration reviewed all applications that came in by an end-of-August deadline – more than 16,000 in total.  Sorry, but I’m feeling the need to throw the bullshit flag on that one.  I mean seriously?  How stupid does one need to be to actually believe that Barry took the time to sit down and pour over all those records?

Barry has long called for phasing out strict sentences for drug offenses, arguing that they lead to excessive punishment and incarceration rates unseen in other developed countries.  And it has been with Barry’s enthusiastic support that the Justice Department, in recent years, has directed prosecutors to rein in the use of harsh mandatory minimums.  Earlier in the week, Barry also commuted most of the rest of convicted leaker Bradley Manning’s sentence, arguing the Army intelligence analyst had shown remorse and already served a long sentence.  What remorse?  There was a reason that Manning was sentenced to 35 years.  But Barry saw it differently.

Let’s be honest here, in reality these final commutations was nothing more than Barry taking one last opportunity to gives the middle finger to law-abiding Americans, and law enforcement officers like nothing else could!  He seems to have an unbridled fondness towards drug pushers!  And especially if they happen to be black!!  I’d love to see the racial makeup of those whom Barry has seen fit to release, and I’d like to know how many are Moslem converts.  After all, he seems to be doing all that he can to make sure America becomes even more infested with terrorists!  I’d like to know who’s tracking these slugs as many will likely return to their criminal behavior!

Who in their right mind is able to look at anything Barry did over the course of the last eight years, and honestly say that he anything that he did was done because he loves this country?  From day one of his being in the Oval Office Barry went out of his way to do everything he possibly could to weaken and to diminish this country on every level.  And it was on each and every day of his presidency that he would prove just how much he despises America.  Oh sure, he may have claimed to love America, but, as they say, actions speak louder than words.  And Barry’s actions spoke volumes about the level of hatred he has for America.  But today is a new day!



At last count, there are over 60 Democrats who have now made it known that they intend to continue with their little tantrum by refusing to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration this Friday, simply because their candidate didn’t win.  Which, I suppose should come as no surprise.  After all, remember all those Republicans who refused to attend both of Barry’s inaugurations.  Oh wait a minute, that’s right, THERE WEREN’T ANY!  And that despite the fact that the Republican candidates were defeated, and even though the Democrats had employed their typical slash and burn tactics regarding the politics of personal destruction comprised of rumor, slander and innuendo and even though there had been well-documented, and very pervasive, voter fraud.  Republicans still put country above politics, and chose to behave like adults.  These days you’d be pretty hard-pressed to find an actual adult anywhere near the Democrat Party.

What follows here is a list of just some of the Democrat ‘snowflakes’ who are planning to skip Trump’s swearing-in ceremony: Reps. John Lewis, Steve Cohen, Jerrold Nadler, Don Beyer, Mark Takano, Yvette Clarke, Ted Liu, Raul Grijalva, John Conyers, Mark Desaulnier, Rep. Nydia Velazquez, Kurt Schrader, Pramila Jayapal, William Lacy Clay, Barbara Lee, Jos Serrano, Judy Chu, Luis Gutierrez, Jared Huffman, Katherine Clark, Earl Blumenauer, Karen Bass, Keith Ellison, Adriano Espaillat, Mark Pocan, Maxine Waters, Marcia Fudge, Al Green, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Anthony Brown, Chellie Pingree, John Yarmouth, Dwight Evans, Zoe Lofgren, Grace Napolitano, Raul Ruiz, Adam Smith, Darren Sotto, Ruben Gallego, G.K. Butterfield, Joaquin Castro, Tony Cardenas, Mike Doyle, Carol Shea-Porter, Donald M. Payne, Alma Adams, Brendan F. Boyle, Robert A. Brady, Frederica Wilson, Jerry McNerney, and last, Peter A. DeFazio and more.

And while, to my knowledge, no Democrat senators have yet indicated they intend to skip the inauguration, at least thus far, the ‘Communist News Network (CNN) has suggested that Democrat Chuckie Schumer has left the door open for those deciding to do so.  Because you see, it was Chuckie who apparently said, “I think each person has to make the choice on their own, but I don’t begrudge those who have said they’re boycotting. Each person can make his or her own decision.”  Dozens of Democrat lawmakers announced they would not attend the inauguration after ‘legendary’ civil rights activist Rep. John Lewis stated that he does not believe Trump is a “legitimate president,” that he is “wrong” for the nation, and that this is the first inauguration at which he will not be present.  Lewis seems to think this “civil rights” thing of his provides him with the luxury of saying anything he wants with a certain degree of immunity.  It most assuredly does not!

And it was soon after he made this claim of his that a report surfaced which showed that Lewis had also skipped George W. Bush’s inauguration because he did not believe Bush was the true elected president, thus it would be hypocritical for him to attend.  Trump wasted little time in tweeting, “John Lewis said about my inauguration, ‘It will be the first one that I’ve missed.’ WRONG (or lie)! He boycotted Bush 43 also because he thought it would be hypocritical to attend Bush’s swearing-in….he doesn’t believe Bush is the true elected president.’ Sound familiar!”  Now I’m sure that Lewis remembered full well that he had acted just as childishly in 2001 as he is acting today, but he was likely confident that no one would be calling him on it.  And for the most part, he was pretty much correct.  However, an interesting question was posed by black journalist Crystal Wright, who asked what it is that Lewis has managed to do since his days at Selma.  Obviously not all that much.

And New Hampshire Democrat Rep. Carol Shea-Porter noted that instead of attending the inauguration she’ll go to religious services to “pray for all of our leaders and people.”  Shea-Porter represents a congressional district that Trump won.  In fact, Trump won more votes than Shea-Porter did.  Shea-Porter received 162,080 votes in her district while Trump received 179,259 in the same district.  And it was Jeanie Forrester, who is running for chair of the New Hampshire Republican Party, who sent out a tweet pointing this out:  Forrester, who is running uncontested and has received the backing of Gov. Chris Sununu, will face elections on Jan. 28.  And it was in response to the Democrats skipping the inauguration, that Rep. Sean Duffy, Republican, said, “Put your big boy pants on.”  He added, “and let’s start working together.”  But I seriously doubt any of these Democrat ‘snowflakes’ even own a pair of ‘big boy pants.’

And ya know, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to find out that at least some of these pathetic crybaby-Democrats actually plan on giving up their seat to some butthurt-snowflake-protestor who will be only too glad to stand up and scream during the reading of the oath of office and Trump’s Speech.  After all, that’s how these malcontents operate.  While we, as a nation, were successful in dodging one big bullet with the defeat of Hitlery, we need to remain vigilant because there are those, both Democrats and some Republicans, who will stop at nothing to make sure the country remains on the path that Barry put it.  And just as important, Trump will need to keep the many promises that he made to those who made his victory possible.  And as long as he does, it will come to further prove the point that the Democrat Party has no interest in “Making America Great Again”, their only interest seems to be in destroying America.



If the Democrats want to continue to bring up the question of legitimacy regarding the fact that Trump is about to be inaugurated as the 45th president, then maybe the time has come for us to focus the bright light of truth on their candidate in an effort to determine the legitimacy of her candidacy.  Because the Democrats really have no one to blame for the fact that their seriously flawed, and hopelessly corrupt, candidate lost the election.  And the sooner they are able to come to grips regarding that fact, the sooner they can, as a party, get back on the road to recovery.  But if Democrats continue to console themselves by claiming Donald Trump’s election is illegitimate, then I’m afraid they’re going to accomplish very little for themselves or the nation unless they take the time to consider some of their own faults, including the top-to-bottom corruption of their party and their willingness to continue with their outdated political strategy.  So how was Hitlery illegitimate?

  1. The Democrats’ rigged primary: Democrats should begin by accepting the obvious truth that theirs was a rigged primary process. The party’s key leaders, and not the party’s voters, picked and then promoted Hitlery, meaning she was secretly coronated before the primary process even began. Her rival Bernie Sanders never had a chance. The “nomination” contest was pure theater designed to make Sanders voters accept Hitlery.  His voters ought to be furious at Sanders for playing along with this farce, which he most certainly did.  When Party elders shriek about nefarious Russian interference in the election process, they’re simply attempting to distract attention away from what the leaked DNC emails actually said, and the fact that we now know those emails were 100 percent genuine, despite Democrat statements to the contrary.  One of those shrieking claims came from Donna Brazile, who was directly involved in doctoring a primary debate by leaking questions to Hitlery.
  2. The Democrat super-delegate system: Then there’s the openly rigged element of the Democrat primary, the super-delegate system. It’s a political instrument specifically designed to shut down insurgencies and make the interests of Democrat voters secondary to the judgment of the party elites, and the powerful lobbyists who manipulate them. Hitlery was chosen by special-interest donors who had already spent a fortune currying favor with her, as demonstrated by the instantaneous collapse of the Clinton “charities”, the very instant the Clintons had no more favors to sell.
  3. The Democrat money machine: Building up a massive campaign war chest was the paramount concern of the Democrats in 2016, because, or so they and their many media allies thought, it would give them an unbreakable headlock over the public debate. Hence ‘Slow Joe’ Biden was told he couldn’t afford to get into the race, and the same for Marty O’Malley.  Their financial kneecapping allowed Hitlery to suck up hundreds of millions in campaign cash, some in legally questionable ways, even as she railed against the influence of money in politics.
  4. The media was part of Hitlery’s campaign: It’s fun to watch Democrats wail about Russian spies using WikiLeaks to influence the election, when it’s clear the state-controlled media was able to downplay the actual contents of those emails enough to keep most voters completely in the dark. And while there were certain conservative outlets that did everything they could to report those revelations, their effort paled in comparison to the influence wielded by the state-controlled media.  The same state-controlled media that was an active participant in the rigged primary scandal.  Those leaked emails from the DNC and Hitlery campaign chief John Podesta reflected very, very poorly on the press.  That’s something Democrats could fix – there’s no reason for illegitimate behind-the-scenes coordination between their candidates and the media.   Democrat voters should now demand an end to the incestuous relationship between the media and Democrat politics because it has become such a liability.  Sure, it’s helpful to have the media in your hip pocket, but the value of that advantage is severely degraded when the public knows about it, and has lost faith in the establishment press as a result. Worse, the media enabled a weak, out-of-touch candidate like Hitlery to capture the party’s nomination.
  5. The law was bent and broken to keep Hitlery in the game: Democrat voters also should be questioning the legitimacy of Hitlery’s nomination because the rule of law was corrupted to preserve her political viability. But let’s face it, since when do Democrats actually care much about the rule of law especially when doing so could end up hindering their favored candidate from getting elected. That said, her candidacy should have ended when the email server story broke.  And oddly enough the Barry highly politicized Justice Department did Democrats no favors by staving off indictments that would have taken Hitlery out of the game, or by slow-walking the email investigation until her replacement became prohibitively difficult.  Barry perfected tactics for dragging scandal investigations out until they became “old news,” but they miscalculated and prolonged Hitlery’s email scandal until it blew up.

Before they began howling about Russian espionage, Democrats were busy pushing the narrative that FBI Director James Comey sabotaged Hitlery’s election hopes by speaking at length about her “extremely careless” actions when he announced no charges would be recommended, and then kneecapped her again by reviving the Hitlery investigation briefly during the final days of the campaign.  As with their narrative about WikiLeaks, Democrats are complaining that Hitlery was “sabotaged” because people revealed the truth about her.  So what they’re saying is that their presidential candidate could only win if damaging facts were concealed, false media narratives were perpetuated, and special exemptions from the law were granted to her. That sounds like the very definition of an ‘illegitimate’ candidacy.

  1. Democrats try to hack the electorate: We might also challenge the legitimacy of a political strategy that relies so heavily upon using immigration to hack the demographics of the American electorate. Before Hitlery’s defeat shocked them into silence, liberal analysts were beginning to churn out a fresh wave of “Emerging Democrat Majority” pieces about how native-born GOP voters would never win a national election again. One of the reasons Democrats subjected the Electoral College (EC) to one of their post-election tantrums is that the EC makes it harder for them to hack the presidential vote with mass immigration. That’s the true significance of the observation that Hitlery’s popular-vote “victory” came entirely from one state, California.

The Democrats’ strategy for winning seems to have been based on their decision to downplay the economic concerns of struggling Americans in favor of outreach to immigrants, racial subgroups, gays, professionals, unmarried women, and other element of the hoped-for ‘Emerging Democrat Majority.’  If Democrats didn’t believe they had a reserve army of immigrant voters for Hitlery, might they have instead nominated ‘Slow Joe’ or Sanders in an effort to win ordinary Americans to their side. Amusingly, if those immigrants didn’t exist, American voters’ incomes would be higher, and there likely would have been fewer disgruntled Americans who would have been angry enough to shift their votes to the GOP’s candidate.

So in an effort to sort of sum things up, I think it’s fair to say that everything about Hitlery’s nomination, as well as her campaign, should now be called into question by every rank and file member of the Democrat Party.  Democrats need to realize just how corrupt their party really has become and get to work in trying to reform it before they lose again in 2020.  Because short of completely ignoring the Constitution or persuading the military to install their next candidate, they likely will lose.  As Barry would say if the shoe was on the other foot, reforming the Democrat Party is the ‘legitimate’ thing to do.  As for the Republicans, they know that there are many other techniques that Democrats use to hack the electorate, including the Democrats’ control over the media and our education systems.  That’s why Republicans need to get to work hard and fast in an effort to disable all of them, permanently, because they have a sworn duty to protect the legitimacy of our election process.

And I think we can all agree that those responsible for essentially ‘installing” Barry as president in 2008 by refusing to properly vet him, are the very same ones who did all they could to rabidly defend Hitlery in 2016.  They knew who he really was then, and are still working to keep quiet who they know him to be today!  And yet they foisted him upon the rest of us, not once but twice, and continue to brag about that fact to this very day!  And they worked just as hard to foist Hitlery upon us despite being very well aware of just how corrupt she truly is.  Sadly, rank and file Democrats seem to have missed completely the fact that it has been their own Party leadership, as well as the liberal media, who have continually rigged the game against them.  The fix was in, in 2016, from the very beginning and the truth about the blatant dishonesty of their candidate was kept from the voters.  As Democrats like to claim, they are the “champion” of the little guy, yet they really DISDAIN the little guy.



Before the election of Barry “Almighty”, the American people had never before chosen a man so ill equipped to hold the office to which he had been elected.  But not only that, they had also apparently never before elected someone who possessed such a high opinion of himself, to the point where he views himself as being nearly God-like.  You see, Barry has come to view no other person as suited as he to be the leader of this once great nation.  And he has now made it quite clear that even the election of his successor will not prevent him from doing, or saying, whatever he feels is necessary when it comes to what his successor may have planned.

And Barry could not have made his position any clearer than he did in his final weekly address of 2016 as he made it clearer than ever that he won’t retire quietly once Donald Trump is sworn in as president.  Couching his address to the nation as assurance that he will remain committed to defending the “progress” achieved by his administration, Barry made it crystal clear that he intends to be a thorn in President Trump’s side after the official handover of power on January. 20.  And his rationale for doing so has very little, if anything, to with what’s actually best for the country that he was elected to lead for the last eight years.

As has so often been the case over the course of those last eight years, it’s always, and I do mean always, about him.  Offering the clearest indication yet of his plan to be active on the political scene after he is ostensibly back in private life, Barry said Saturday, “As I prepare to take on the even more important role of citizen, know that I will be there with you every step of the way to ensure that this country forever strives to live up to the incredible promise of our founding — that all of us are created equal, and all of us deserve every chance to live out our dreams.”  He speaks of the promise of our founding and yet has worked tirelessly to undermine it.

The words were an implicit rebuke of the inequality and retrograde policies that Democrats claim will be on the agenda of Trump and the Republicans when they take over what will be a unified Republican government next month.  Back when Barry expected, and most polls indicated, that Hitlery was going to win the White House, Barry had gone so far as to suggest that he was actually looking forward to a quiet retirement.  But now that the election didn’t exactly go as planned, Barry says his plans have changed considerably. The unmistakable suggestion is that Barry claims he needs to stay active to guard the nation against Trump’s predations.

Many of Barry’s main ‘accomplishments’ and priorities, such as Obamacare and a green agenda hailed by environmental activists, are on Trump’s list for demolition. Barry and the Democrats see the clear prospect that his legacy will be reduced sharply by the incoming government.  And Barry’s Saturday speech shows that he does not intend to simply stand by and let that happen.  Touting what he claims as gains made in expanding health insurance coverage, job creation, bringing troops back to the U.S. from Afghanistan and Iraq, and killing Osama bin Laden, Barry said that the country has “made extraordinary progress as a country these past eight years.”

Barry’s Saturday address was little more than a dogged defense of all that HE has done for or to America since HE was first sworn into office on the fateful day back in January, 2009.  He said income is rising, poverty is falling and claimed the auto industry is “resurgent.”  And in turning to diplomacy, Barry said, “We shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons program, opened up a new chapter with the people of Cuba, and brought nearly 200 nations together around a climate agreement that could save this planet for our kids.”  And, of course, he also gave a nod to the 2015 Supreme Court ruling to grant nationwide marriage equality.

And in this his final address of 2016 Barry said, “We’ve made extraordinary progress as a country these past eight years.”  He went on to say, “And here’s the thing: none of it was inevitable. It was the result of tough choices we made, and the result of your hard work and resilience.”  Looking ahead, Barry said the task of moving forward on progress falls to people working together.  Barry thanked Americans for their support and said “almost every country on Earth sees America as stronger and more respected today than they did eight years ago.”  But such a statement bears a much closer resemblance to wishful thinking than it does to any actual facts.

It’s in looking back at what Barry describes as being extraordinary progress what we see is the lowest labor participation since the 1970s, nearly 95 million Americans out of the labor force, the worst economic recovery since the 1940s, the lowest home ownership rate in 50 years, nearly 13 million more Americans on food stamps, over 43 million Americans living in poverty, a median household income lower now than in the 1970s, 1 in 5 families without someone in the workforce, 1 in 6 men ages 18-24 are either incarcerated or out of the workforce and more debt than all other president combined.  This is what Barry sees as “extraordinary progress?”

Besides his refusal to go quietly into the night, as have other presidents before him, Barry is also very actively involved in what can only be described as an aggressive campaign of sabotage against Donald Trump.  And while he may claim that he’s only seeking to protect the country from what he claims is Trump’s dangerous policies, his true motivation is more likely something much more ominous, even sinister.  Because he knows, he has to know, that if Trump becomes successful in his effort to “make America great again” he will also succeed in revealing just how much of a colossal failure, and unmitigated disaster, Barry’s policies have truly been.

It would seem the Barry has been going out of his way, of late, to make things as difficult as he can for our new president.  Whether it’s his attempt to bring about a new cold war with Russia, his ban on oil drilling both on public lands and off shore, his blatant national-monument land grab, his choosing to eliminating the national immigration registry, his orchestrating the great Guantanamo jailbreak or doing all that he can to depict Trump’s election as being nothing more than a disaster for America and the world, Barry is proving himself to be little more than a very dedicated saboteur.  A role that you can very plainly see that he very much relishes.

Meanwhile, Barry’s crimes number, quite literally, into the thousands. The comforting thing is, anything the Barry has done via fiat can be quickly undone with a single stroke of Trump’s pen.  This is the problem with Barry ruling by executive order rather than governing by legislation, his so-called “accomplishments” are not worth the paper on which they are written. Barry’s totalitarian rule via non-representative fiat is smoke in a hurricane and will not override representative government.  I very much miss my Constitutional Republic and desperately want it back!  And I pray every day that Mr. Trump is up to the very daunting challenge that lies ahead of him.



Ever the confident malcontent, Barry “Almighty” recently asserted, and very boldly so, that he could have easily won a third term against Donald Trump if he had been permitted to run again, and by using his original mantra of “Hope and Change.”  It was during a ‘Clinton News Network’ (CNN) podcast interview with David “My Mommy is a Commie” Axelrod that Barry declared, “I am confident in this vision because I’m confident that if I had run again and articulated it, I think I could’ve mobilized a majority of the American people to rally behind it.”  Thankfully, we’ll never know for sure if that would have been the case.

And he went on to say, “I know that in conversations that I’ve had with people around the country, even some people who disagreed with me, they would say, ‘The vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one.'”  If that’s true, why is it that recent polling data tells us that it’s an overwhelming percentage of the American people who are of the opinion that their country is headed in the wrong direction?  Hence we have a President-Elect Trump.  Barry also stressed he would be working hard to develop young Democrat leaders once he left office, and didn’t discount the possibility of his speaking out on issues should he be so inclined.

He said, “At a certain point, you make room for new voices and fresh legs.”  And he added, “That doesn’t mean that if a year-and-a-half from now, or two years from now, there is an issue of such moment, such import, that isn’t just a debate about a particular tax bill or a particular policy, but goes to some foundational issues about our democracy that I might now weigh in.”  He said, “You know, I’m still a citizen and that carries with it duties and obligations.” Barry also accused the media for holding Hitlery to a double standard.  Though he did suggest that she made a mistake in focusing more on Trump than on her own economic message.

Barry said, “Understandably, I think she looked and said well, given my opponent and the things he’s saying and what he’s doing, we should focus on that.”  And of course Barry also saw fit to assign some level of blame when he called “filters” like Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and the NRA for disrupting his message of “Hope and Change”.  But what we see 7 years later is that his message was more like “hoax and chains.”  Barry said, “[I]f we’re not actually out there like we are during campaigns, then folks in a lot of these communities, what they’re hearing is Obama wants to take away my guns or Obamacare’s about transgender bathrooms and not my job.”

Barry concluded that he neglected to properly understand the significance of the conservative media.  Actually he was likely confident that the liberal media would be more successful in making the conservative media, irrelevant.  But Barry did go on to ask, “Part of what I’ve struggled with during my presidency and part of what I think I’ll be thinking a lot about after my presidency is how do we work around all these filters?”  Barry said, “And it becomes more complicated now that you’ve got social media, where people are getting news that reinforces their biases and — and separates people out instead of bringing them together.”

But while Barry professes to be so concerned about what he refers to as being filters, he seems only to be concerned only with those on the right.  And something Barry chose not to mention was how Hitlery once declared that she would essentially serve as the third-term president of Barry’s legacy.  And let’s not forget that both Barry and Moochelle campaigned pretty heavily for the perennial Democrat, and yet Trump still won the White House.  Barry still asserts that he would have won had he run for re-election, even though President-elect Donald Trump won on several key issues that directly reject Barry’s goal for America.

In choosing to elect Barry, I sincerely believe Americans voted in an impostor; not once but twice. This man’s agenda was to destroy America. He has never once recognized this great country or her people on the basis of their true accomplishments.  Hitlery’s agenda was the same as his and she had the plus of being a woman.  Yet she lost.  Intent on proving that he learned nothing in his eight years of taxpayer funded self-absorption, he reprises a version of the 2008 “bitter clinger” meme to explain the complete rejection of his “leadership” in 2016.  That darn NRA, Limbaugh and Fox! THEY are the reason my brilliance was obscured to the gullible!



One of the biggest disappointments of this entire election season, although something not totally unexpected, was how we were made to witness that which can only be described as the complete unraveling and final demise of what was once referred to as being our mainstream media.  As the days pass and the smoke continues to clear a bit after the shocking events of November 8th, it’s difficult to come to grips with the magnitude of their collapse. While it’s true that their demise has been many years in the making, it doesn’t make what we just witnessed any less stunning.

Some in the ‘press’, those who have managed to get beyond their grief, have shown a bit of introspection, after they came to the realization that their political campaign was over and they had lost.  But sadly, the soul-searching itself is just part of the script.  The “we live in a liberal bubble” explanation worked for a while, but it is wholly inadequate to explain 2016.  And while I hesitate to say it, because they still do wield a certain amount of power, it is for all intents and purposes, that which we once called the mainstream media can now be declared, and officially so, quite dead.

And I guess ‘if’ there is anything that can be described as being sad about what it that has occurred here, as it relates to media, it’s that they were essentially killed by their own hand.  In other words, they are dead because they can no longer be trusted when it comes to anything they say.  In 2016, we discovered, and beyond the shadow of any doubt, that those in the mainstream media will not hesitate in the least when it comes to colluding with the Democrat Party in an effort to advance the careers of liberal politicians.  And we now know that they colluded to elect Hitlery.

And this goes far beyond merely siding with liberal policies or demanding in your official ‘media manual’ that pro-lifers be called “anti-abortion.”  That’s plain old liberal bias, and we’re all accustomed to dealing with it.  However, this goes well beyond that.  The “liberal bubble” was Bernard Goldberg’s thesis in his best-selling book Bias, and it made a lot of sense then.  But it turns out, that explanation falls way short.  But while the bubble is real, and it helps explain many aspects of what ails newsrooms all over the country, it nowhere near tells the whole story.

The mainstream media, aka the state-controlled media, provided both cover for and ammunition to the Democrat Party, while hiding behind the misappropriated title of “journalists.”  And they were very open about it, acting as if they no longer cared whether we recognized their biases or not.  But you can’t call yourself “the press” when you give the questions for a presidential debate to one of the candidates.  And you can’t pretend impartiality when you are coordinating with the Democrat National Committee on the questions you need to ask of their opponents.

Today’s press ignores or holds on to information and chooses to release it when it feels that the time is right for maximum political impact.  And the after-election freakout continues in much the same way.  The Clinton News Network’s (CNN) coverage of the anti-Trump protests included a protestor using the “Hillary got more votes” talking point of the left that got a lot of play on social media.  And while the claim is true, there’s never any mention that all of those votes came from California.  Remove that state from the equation and the vote totals are very different.

We need to accept the fact that those in the media are not going to change.  You can forget about that.  Because nothing has really changed.  The same Democrat operatives who worked the newsrooms before the election, continue their work today.  They’ll just have to try harder next time, be subtler or simply work harder at not getting caught.  After all they did almost win.  We just have to adapt to this new “pressless” world.  Sure, there are some good reporters who try to do a good job, but it’s so hard to decipher it all. It’s fair to say most people will not go to the trouble.

Let’s face it, the media is dead.  And it’ll take a miracle to resurrect it.  And it was in a year known mostly for mayhem, misfortune, and madness, that America’s media quickly proved themselves to be unfit for narrating this first draft of history. All too often, when the news got tough, the news got weird.  And while picking 10 of the most egregious examples was no easy task, we’ve whittled thousands of examples down to the ten examples that we think represent 2016 in a nutshell. So without further ado, here are the media’s 10 most mortifying moments of 2016:

  1. After Donald Trump’s underdog victory, many in the media looked for scapegoats. But Comedy Central’s Samantha Bee went the furthest — blaming white people for “ruining” America.
  2. Hitlery notoriously avoided direct questions from the press all year. So when Lester Holt became one of the few to somehow score a sit down with her, his softballs-only interview was journalistically humiliating.
  3. Cuba’s longtime dictator expired this year, and many in America’s media actually mourned.
  4. And perhaps while not historically significant, a particularly comical case of media malpractice came when an enchanted Andrea Mitchell breathlessly recapped the “magical” evening she was having at a Hitlery rally.
  5. Over on taxpayer funded PBS, David Brooks and David Corn somehow connected the dots between Ted Cruz and Satan. Go figure!
  6. After the devastating mass slaughter in Orlando, the media embraced its unfortunate habit of speculating where things went wrong — looking everywhere, it seemed, besides Islamic terrorism.
  7. After another tragedy — this time an alligator snatching a toddler from a Disney World beachfront — CNN’s Brooke Baldwin thankfully had the presence of mind to ask a local animal expert … what the alligator was thinking.
  8. On MSNBC, the now-canceled Melissa Harris Perry worried that Flint, Mich., might become Barry “Almighty’s”… Fugitive Slave Act?
  9. After Orlando, many progressive congressmen staged a sit-in on the floor of the House of Representatives. The media, you be unsurprised to discover, went absolutely bananas with delight.
  10. If there was one thing the media was absolutely sure of in 2016, it was … Hitlery’s inevitable landslide victory. Whoops.

I think we can all agree that the ‘media’ is composed of little more than Snowflakes who believe themselves to be ‘journalists’.  They are entitled people motivated by a sense of superiority and condescension.  They were brainwashed in their colleges to think ‘progressively”, meaning, they believe whatever the professors say.  They see themselves as being born to inform and guide the masses.  And while they honestly hate ‘hate’, they are, at the same time, free to hate, because hate is deserved.  The best you can do with this people is to ignore them, or simply make fun of them.

The corrupt ‘Left’ as well as well as those in the state-controlled media remain in full denial when it comes to this election. They still can’t believe Americans didn’t want a crooked, criminal leftwing nut of a “woman” to be their President. And so it goes. The real story about this election is that people feared that Hitlery would continue with the highly destructive socialist policies of Barry.  That’s why the Democrats lost. You can say anything you like about Trump, but he is far superior to this corrupt, old school politician. It’s always good for the country when crooked loses.

So the mainstreamers will now have a choice to make, either do the job a journalist is supposed, and expected, to do, that being, tell the truth and let others decide on their own or continue to toe the Democrat Party line or, continue to lie, cheat, and obscure the real truth.  The media has a responsibility to the people and to the Republic and if they continue to ignore that responsibility, they willingly forfeit any credibility they desire in return.  And if what we have seen taking place since the election, it would appear that the choice has already been made.

Eventually they will go out of business. I never watch CNN and rarely even watch Fox. Eventually people will simply stop watching and whoever is funding them will tire of burning up money. What I worry more about, and this includes newspapers as well, is who is doing the real, and still very much needed, investigative reporting?  Wikileaks helped expose Hitlery, the media bias, Clinton money laundering, etc.  But hacking private emails is not hardnosed journalism. We badly need real investigating and reporting to keep politicians honest. We have lost that and we need it back, soon.