Gun Control 27

More often than not it’s typically a Democrat who will look you in the eye and tell you that it’s not YOUR gun that they’re wanting to take away.  But we’ve always had that little voice in the back of our mind telling us that that is all a bunch of bullshit!  And now comes a recent poll conducted by YouGov that supports what that little voice has been warning us about, well, forever.  Because it shows that Democrats largely favor taking away all guns, not just the ‘scary-looking’ ones.

In this particular survey, respondents across the political spectrum — Democrat, Republican, and Independent — were asked to show their favorability of banning semiautomatic weapons.  As was noted by HotAir in its coverage, the question was the all-inclusive “weapons,” not semiautomatic “assault rifles.”  Those answering might’ve thought this meant the latter but “weapons” would be inclusive of handguns, technically speaking.  Here are the results:


It should come as little or no surprise that is was 82 percent of Democrats who said that they favor banning “semiautomatic weapons,” with only 13 percent saying that they oppose such a move.  But what was most surprisingly is the fact that 25 percent of Republicans, or those who claimed to Republicans for the purpose of this poll, “strongly favor” banning them and 12 percent “somewhat” favor a ban.  Independents appeared to be a bit more evenly split.

The next question asked about banning all handguns, which wasn’t popular among Republicans or Independents. But Democrats seem to like the idea very much.  As you can see it was 44 percent of Democrats who said that they would be in favor of banning all handguns, proof, I guess you could say, that the party ultimately wants only the police and military to have weapons.  Now criminals will have them too, but not to worry, the police are just minutes away, right?


But even more worrisome is the question about repealing the Second Amendment, which actually sounds fantastic to 39 percent of the Democrats respondents to this poll.  All political categories strongly favored requiring mental health evaluations for gun purchases, which I too am in favor of, but what’s a stickler for me in that regard is how exactly “mental illness” might be defined.  And knowing Democrats as we all do, I worry that the definition would likely be quite broad.

A statement from YouGov said, “A majority of the public consistently has supported many gun control proposals: just over half in last week’s Economist/YouGov Polls say they want stricter gun laws in general,”  And they went on to say, “But support has not grown beyond that – until now. In the latest Economist/YouGov Poll, 61 percent say there should be stricter gun laws, up eight points in the last week.”  Likely because of the steady stream of anti-gun drivel from the media.

And when it comes to stricter gun laws and even repealing the Second Amendment, it seems that the youth of America are screaming louder than the adults who, sadly, know better.  And unfortunately, it seems to be working.  But should we really be all that surprised knowing as we do that our children stopped learning pretty much anything about our Constitution decades ago.  And these days it’s far more important to ‘teach’ them about ‘white privilege’ and how gay sex is ‘normal.’

It’s the gun control/confiscation elites who all live in gated communities/buildings with security that’s armed with GUNS.  They send their kids to private schools with resource officers who are again is armed with GUNS, and who would not be found cowering behind a car while children were dying inside.  And they work in buildings that also have guards armed with GUNS.  Meanwhile we little people must contend with in gun free zones and run the risk of being shot by some crazy.

Perhaps if schools were to start teaching history classes again, and not just American history, but the true history of Communism and Socialism as well, kids would have a greater respect for the rights they have and why it is that they have them. We fought wars to stop the spread of communism and then let it fester in our schools until they brainwashed all of our children into hating America, hating capitalism, hating freedom, and putting all their faith in an all-powerful government.

Take a good look at most of the people who vote Democrat. The Founding Fathers themselves would have banned their possession of weapons.  I strongly suspect that 80 percent of Democrats couldn’t tell you the difference between a semi-automatic rifle and a bazooka.  Liberal intolerance and demands do not require facts to be fully supported in our upside down society.  The left, which now controls the Democrat Party, demonizes ANYONE who dares to disagree with them.

And despite the denials of many anti-gun folks, banning has to mean confiscation. There’s no point in only preventing future firearm sales if there are 300 million firearms already in America.  We don’t need more gun laws.  All we need to do, just as in the case of our immigration laws, is to enforce the many laws already on the books.  It’s that regard that we need a lot less Democrats, as well as fewer RINOs, in Congress and we must keep that in mind come this November!

And finally, any doubt of the Democrat Party’s total lack of loyalty to America and its complete lack of patriotism was dispelled with this survey.  And anyone foolish enough to believe they will stop once they get done with the Second Amendment is dangerously naive.  The goal of the Democrat Party today is nothing short of complete dismantling of the Bill of Rights and trashing of the Constitution. These people have utter contempt for the Constitution and anyone who believes in it.



I keep hearing about how the Democrats are now once again poised to regain control of Congress this November, while at the same time I’m hearing Nancy Pelosi babbling on and on about how the recent tax cuts benefit only the rich and how bonuses up to $2000 are mere “crumbs”, ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters leading chants of, “Impeach 45, Impeach 45, Impeach 45”, and I wonder how is it that such a thing could be even remotely possible.  Now granted, the Republicans have done themselves few favors over the course of, especially, the last year, but to hand control of Congress back to these Democrats would be the ultimate act of stupidity by the American people.

And now we have yet another Democrat dolt, this time from the liberal cesspool of Illinois, by the name of Danny Davis who seems to think that it’s acceptable for only wealthy individuals to have access firearms if a 50 percent federal tax on all guns and ammunition were to become law.  This boob said, “So if rich people can only get firearms then only rich people would be able to pay the price and if that could prevent some people from getting them, I’d want to prevent all people from getting them.”  And he added, “But if rich people were willing and would continue to pay the high price, then I’d be happy that we kept the other group from getting them.”

This imbecile, Davis, introduced a bill Tuesday called The Gun Violence Prevention and Safe Communities Act, which would increase federal excise taxes on shells and cartridges from 11 percent to 50 percent.  Additionally, the legislation hikes taxes on pistols and revolvers from 10 percent to 20 percent.  He said, “Well I think the whole idea is to make it a little bit more difficult for individuals who are going to use these weapons if they’re going to use them then at least they could pay more to do so, and it would actually generate money that could be used for you know violence prevention efforts or some other kind of programs or even for trauma treatment.”

When asked if his bill would give wealthy folks exclusive access to firearms while the financially lower classes would be shut out from such sales he replied, “Well I’d be just as pleased if neither group would be able to get them, so it doesn’t pose an issue for me because I would like to outlaw them altogether.”  He continued, “I’m saying I’d like to make it where nobody except military personnel would ever have access to these weapons. So it wouldn’t bother me that one category of people couldn’t get them even if the other one was willing to pay the high price for them. Then we use that money for services that are needed then people could make use of it.”

This same guy, Davis, introduced a similar bill in 2015 with 12 co-sponsors, all of whom were, of course, Democrats.  The group Americans for Tax Reform opposes the new bill.  And it was Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who said, “Democrats are seeking to tax guns out of existence.”  And he added, “Now that the GOP tax cut has benefited 90 percent of Americans, the one danger facing the Republican Congress is the ‘intensity gap.’ The Democrats have decided to solve this problem for Republicans by targeting gun owners and taxpayers in the same futile gesture: a threatened tax on guns.”  Something Hitlery too once favored.

This guy is nothing more than just another black ‘lawmaker’ spewing what is nothing more than Democrat Party nonsense.  So much for the falsehood regarding the Democrats being the protectors of the poor and downtrodden.  Where do they find these buffoons?  You can’t tell me that somewhere in the district that he represents there isn’t someone a little brighter. Funny isn’t it that Democrats don’t want the right to vote protected because IDs would discriminate against the poor who couldn’t afford to get them, but the right to defend oneself is now to be denied to those who cannot afford to pay the tax on guns?  What a bunch of pathetic hypocrites.

Davis is yet another example, as if we really need one, of why the state of Illinois is now so far into the toilet that it’s just one flush away from heading down into the sewer.  And this is what we’ve come to expect from Democrats; ridiculous proposals with no way of accomplishing anything sensible.  So is this boob Davis now okay with the Jim Crow-like laws that will essentially prevent blacks from owning firearms?  Where will the tax end, when a $500 firearm has a $100k tax?  And where exactly would the criminals pay this tax?  And when Davis says “only the military” should have firearms, does he not realize that he’s advocating that we live in a police state?

So once again the Democrat agenda has been put out there for all to see.  We need to keep in mind here that every concession we make on gun control is allowing them to inch closer to full disarmament and even confiscation.  We need to take a stand and show them it will not be tolerated, we are not giving them anymore of a foothold to attack our right to defend ourselves.  And it’s this guy Davis who is a perfect example of all that’s wrong with our government.  This is what we get for electing stupid people like him to Congress. If he took the time to listen to what he said, he still wouldn’t see anything wrong with it. The rising tide of color continues on.

Davis once again proves that our Congressional Black Caucus is quite the collective of intellectuals.  NOT!  The best thing any of these people could ever do is to keep their big mouths shut.  Because every time they open their mouth, and I mean EVERY single time, they only succeed in removing pretty much any and all doubt that they are nothing but a bunch of complete morons.  And they clearly demonstrate that were it not for the fact that most of them likely live in predominantly black districts there’s not a snowball’s chance in Hell that any of them would have ever been elected in the first place.  But then I suppose that’s a rant that should be saved for another day.



Anyone who believes that ANY of the many Democrats who have thus far expressed their ‘outrage’ regarding the tragedy that recently took place at a Florida high school are doing so out of their deep ‘concern’ for public safety, is, without a doubt, among the most gullible individuals to be found anywhere on the planet.  I mean the bodies weren’t even cold before we had a number of these pathetic, scum-sucking hypocritical Democrats, including ex-president Barry ‘O’, crawling out from under their collective rock and doing their best to capitalize on this tragedy.  Hell, some of these creeps were even fund raising off of it.  If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about the modern day Democrat Party, you must be a Democrat.

Following comments made by his leftist colleagues from Connecticut just the day before, it was Democrat Bill Nelson who took to the Senate floor yesterday to take his turn at trying to score points from the high school shooting in Parkland, FL that resulted in 17 deaths and multiple injuries.  After a moment of silence, Nelson said, “At some point, we’ve got to say enough is enough. At some point we, as a society, have to come together and put a stop to this.”  It was from there that this refugee from a burn unit continued by saying, “To those who say now that it’s not the time to talk about gun violence because it’s too soon, we don’t want to politicize right after a tragedy. That’s what is said over and over. Then I would ask, when is the time?”

And it was then that this leftwing crackpot went on to ask, “How many more times do we have to do this? How many more folks have to die? When is enough going to be enough? So let’s don’t hide from it. Let’s have the conversation about this right now – not just about mental illness, and that’s part of it, not just about protection at our schools, and that’s part of it – let’s get to the root cause, let’s come together and help end this violence. Let’s talk about that 19 year old carrying an AR-15. Let’s do what needs to be done. And let’s get these assault weapons off our streets.”  I can only assume that Nelson must have been pretty confident that most of those likely to hear his idiotic rant, made from the Senate floor, were likely to be pretty stupid!

Nelson added, “Let’s just not talk about it. Let’s do something about it. Let’s make what happened at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School a pivotal moment in this country’s history, not because it was one of the largest mass shootings – but, hopefully, because it was the last.”  But I guess what worries me is what, exactly, that old Bill might be in favor of doing.  I mean we’ve had an “assault weapons’ ban before and it accomplished absolutely nothing, evidenced by the fact that it was allowed to die.  So what is that old Bill might have in mind this time around?  Because it’s usually when you have a guy like Nelson telling you you don’t need a gun, you can pretty much guarantee that it’s time you best start looking to purchase one.

But you know it’s just like Democrats to take full advantage of the ignorance of those who are so totally clueless when it comes to firearms by using completely bogus nomenclature whenever describing the AR-15 rifle or weapons like it.  They simply lie to the American people by calling it an assault rifle when it’s really nothing more than a semi-automatic rifle used for hunting or target shooting.  I have come to hate politicians like this creep Nelson with a passion for what they are doing to my country courtesy of the lies.  Democrat see it as appropriate to punish millions of law abiding gun owners because of the actions of one nut.  Ow about telling someone who has lost a family member to a drunk driver that liquor should now no longer be sold?

In truth, it’s progressive policies enacted into law by leftwing zealots like Nelson that are behind the breakdown, moral, social and even fiscal, of our society as well as of the disintegration of nuclear family. Incentivizing people who are incapable of caring for kids to have kids plus incentivizing men to not take responsibility for their kids and family are but the tip of the iceberg.  All of this culminates in some doughy kid shooting up a school.  It’s not rocket science. But to liberal Democrats looking for fake answers, I guess it is.  Once again I ask of these idiot Senators, define an ‘assault weapon.’  My definition of an assault weapon is one that can fire on full automatic and those have been banned since the 1930’s.  And that’s not what was used here.

Democrats refuse to acknowledge that guns are not the problem here.  In large part this is a mental health issue and one that the bleeding heart liberals are essentially responsible for creating.  It’s been a societal trend where we fail to first identify and then to treat people who exhibit extreme antisocial behavior.  Even in a case such as this where an individual has made overt threats, there appears to have no attempt to intervene either as a community or through some agency to make contact with the individual.  Don’t blame the police though. Now I’m not trying to be sarcastic or trite, but until a person has broken some law there’s very little that the police can do. Could the police have paid the individual a visit based on the YouTube threats, actually yes, but realistically that’s as far as that would go.

Let’s face it, if politicians like Nelson were being honest they would simply come out and say what they’d really like to see happen here, which is nothing short of confiscation.  And because the only way to get those guns is to go door to door, what we’re taking about is the turning of ordinary, law abiding citizens into lawbreakers over nothing more than owning guns that were once legal.  Because there are simply way too many people with legally purchased weapons who would refuse to give them up.  And something else few on the left want to talk about is that gun laws don’t matter to criminals who are already accustomed to breaking laws.  Guns will always be available.  Anybody remember Chicago during the prohibition?

Democrats are on a mission, they have a hidden agenda the focus of which is to change the racial demographics in this country, so that they can then secure for themselves a reelection proof government.  And make no mistake, once Democrats achieve that goal, they will be in position to nationalize major corporations, repeal the Bill of Rights and force whites to pay reparations to blacks, as well as every other grieving group. Democrats also understand that once we realize that it’s going to be impossible to kick them out of office by democratic means, freedom loving people will revolt. That is why they desperate to disarm us now, so that we’ll be unable to oppose them in the future.  These school shootings are just a pretense.



I think we can all agree that there is nothing that brings slimy hypocritical Democrats crawling out of the woodwork faster than a good old fashioned tragedy.  Especially one they consider as being easily exploitable in their effort to accomplish something that has long been very near and dear to their hearts.  That being, of course, their continuing effort to bring an end to the Second Amendment.  It’s already been a number of Democrats who have nearly tripped all over themselves in their rush to be the first to get to a microphone, or television camera, to express both their outrage and their supposed frustration over what they describe as being an epidemic of gun violence such as the recent shooting which took place in Parkland, Florida.

All of which brings me to one of the more despicable, unscrupulous and hypocritical members of the Democrat Party, none other than Chris Murphy, one of the senators who represents that bastion of leftwing lunacy, Connecticut.  You see, it was during a speech he gave from there on the Senate floor, and on the very same day as this terrible shooting, that Murphy demonstrated what has become the typical reaction by members of his party as he commented on the school shooting in Florida.  He claimed that Congress’ “inaction” is “responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He said, “As we speak, there is a horrific scene playing out at a high school in south Florida.”

And it was from there that he went on to say, “Turn on your television right now, you’re going to see scenes of children running for their lives, what looks to be the 19th school shooting in this country, and we have not even hit March. I’m coming to the floor to talk about something else, but let me just note, once again for my colleagues, that this happens nowhere else, other than the United States of America. This epidemic of mass slaughter, this scourge of school shooting after school shooting. It only happens here, not because of coincidence, not because of bad luck, but as a consequence of our inaction.”  Yup, old Chris proceeded to pull out all the stops in his effort to make as much hay as possible from the death of children.  Pretty sick!

But still he went on to say, “We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He continued, “As a parent, it scares me to death that this body doesn’t take seriously the safety of my children, and it seems like a lot of parents in south Florida are going to be asking that same question later today. We pray for the families and for the victims. We hope for the best.”  What this guy is truly praying for is that this most recent tragedy can be portrayed as being horrific enough by him and his fellow Democrats, as well as their allies in the state-controlled media, that they will finally be able to make some measurable progress in removing guns from the hands of law abiding citizens.

But the true insanity in all of this has to do with the fact that we continue to insist upon maintaining our public schools as “gun free’ zones.  How absolutely ludicrous is that?  And it is the very same politicians who preach to us about gun violence and who advocate for ever-stricter gun laws who stand in the way of us being allowed to protect our children.  And why do you suppose that is?  Well only one thing comes to my mind.  They’re simply using our children as bait.  We’re already finding out there were all manner of warning signs out there about this latest shooter, and yet he was still walking around.  What other explanation can there possibly be other than that certain politicians were actually hoping that something like this would happen?

You see, it’s those who strongly favor the creation of stricter gun control laws who are also the ones who remain confident that if they can only manage to get enough of our children killed then maybe it will become all that much easier for them to apply enough pressure to those evil supporters of the Second Amendment in the hope of forcing them to give up on their silly notion of being able to protect themselves and their families.  And it’s this very same leftist cast of characters, who continually go around claiming that it’s we conservatives who are the ones with blood on our hands because of our support of the National Rifle Association (NRA), who are actually the ones most responsible for tragedies such as this shooting in Florida.

Let’s face it, there’s nothing Democrats won’t do in their quest for power and they really don’t care how many bodies pile up as a direct result of their political agenda.  Actually, the higher the body count goes the better they like it, whether we talking about gun violence, terrorism or anything else that creates an opportunity that can then be exploited to the fullest.  And we all know that their motto is, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  However, when it comes to their drive for gun control Democrats seem quite willing to never let a dead child go to waste.  And remember the words of Democrat ‘Fast Eddie’ Rendell, when speaking about the Sandy Hook school shooting.  You know, when he said the good thing about Newtown was that it was so horrific.

And let’s also remember that the Democrat Party is the very same political party whose members very loudly support the Black Lives Matter movement as they advocate for more cops to be assassinated.  What we have here is a very purposeful Marxist attempt to disarm Americans.  When it was made a crime to spank your kids and kids were encouraged to report being yelled at at home, or other such hanging offenses, the left essentially took away those time-tested forms of building good citizens with a sense of respect and discipline.  What we have now, for the most part, is what results from letting a village raise your kids.  Hey, here’s a nutty idea.  Instead of focusing on guns, how about we put Jesus back in our schools.

Look, we all know how Democrats seek to politicize ‘everything.’  They create a climate of hate and then blame others when shit happens.  Remember when Murphy and many of his colleagues spoke on the senate floor and expressed outrage over the number of shooting deaths in Chicago?  Neither do I!  Here we have another cynical and duplicitous ploy from the Left to distract us from their hand in desensitizing our youth to violence, misogyny and general antisocial behavior via Hollyweird, social media, pornography, vulgar lyrics, obscene “art” etc.  Perhaps the Democrats would care to tell us how many mass school shootings we had in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s.  What’s been the biggest change in our society since then?  Rabid Progressivism!

And just a little something on a totally unrelated issue, the upcoming midterm elections, elections upon which so much will be riding.  I think it fair to say that the forces of darkness as now working very hard to marshal their forces, possessing what is a certain level of confidence in being able to ride a wave of dissatisfaction regarding President Trump.  Now say what you will about him, but I am very confident in saying that, economically speaking, the president very much now has this country headed in the right direction.  And if we should be foolish enough to hand control of Congress back to Schumer and Pelosi, it would prove difficult for the president to keep them from heading us right back into the ditch.  So please keep that in mind.



The anti-gun nuts always make the claim that if only we had stricter, and what they like to refer to as ‘commonsense’, gun laws we would finally be able to bring an end to all of this senseless violence.  But what these zealots always fail to mention is the fact that stricter gun laws would do absolutely nothing to reduce the level of gun violence that takes place in this country.  And how do we know this?  That’s easy, simply look at those locales that have taken it upon themselves to create an environment that is essentially nothing more than city-sized gun-free zones where the only people who end up having guns are the bad guys.

For instance, in 2017 there were 664 homicides in Chicago, home of some of the strictest gun laws in the country.  Now in an effort to put that number into some sort of perspective, there were 37 casualties in the U.S. military in its myriad operations around the globe.  And it’s not me who came up those numbers, it’s according to data from the Chicago Tribune and from the Department of Defense’s press office.  The Chicago deaths are for the period Jan. 1, 2017 through Dec. 31, 2017; the military deaths are from Jan. 1, 2017 through Dec. 22, 2017, which is the latest update on casualties by the DoD posted so far.

From the data available, we see that Chicago suffered 17.9 times more homicides than did the U.S. military worldwide last year, and that would include both combat and non-combat related deaths.  U.S. troops have been fighting in Afghanistan since October 2001, more than 16 years ago.  U.S. troops have been in Iraq since March 2003, more than 14 years ago.  The Chicago homicides are monitored and documented by the Chicago Tribune staff 24 hours a day, according to their website, “Crime in Chicagoland.”  And yet it’s seldom that we ever hear much from the left when it comes to the big city body counts other than as an excuse for more gun laws.

But look, we’ve all heard about the murder rate in Chicago for years.  But Chicago is far from being the only Democrat run big city with a violence problem.  And while some will say that there is cause for celebration because the number of murders occurring in Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C. dropped last year (2017), look at the murder rates in places such as St. Louis, the New Orleans area, Baltimore, and Detroit.  You will find that they all have murder rates, per capita, higher than that of Chicago.  So it’s not just Chicago that has a problem.  The murder rate in other cities, also where gun laws are very strict, remains very, very high!

And while I am not trying to beat a dead horse, I think all rational thinking people are all very well aware of what this call for stricter gun laws is really all about.  And it has nothing whatsoever to do with public safety.  That’s simply how those on the left continue to try to sell it.  It’s all nothing more than another effort to circumvent the Constitution and to go about the complete, and systematic, disarming of the American people.  Because whether you think of me as being paranoid or some sort of conspiracy nut, we the people are the last line of defense against a tyrannical government that would, if it could, strip from us every freedom we possess.



Every time there is a tragedy like the one on Las Vegas, the first thing out of the mouth of liberals everywhere is gun control. They don’t particularly care about those who died or were injured, it just makes them sound like they care and is another way of trying to get more of their kind elected.  Chicago and Detroit have continually killed inner city people for years and yet Democrats simply sit on their hands and do nothing because this is not about public safety, it’s about controlling the people.  And what Democrats, and their friends in the media, seek to do is not to find a solution to the problem, but instead to use these dead bodies as the basis for their propaganda that this can all be solved if only we make ‘commonsense’ changes to our gun laws.

Question: Has the Democrat Party now gotten its kook base so worked up over the issue of gun control that one of their own would willingly take it upon themselves to commit an atrocity on the level of what we witnessed in Las Vegas, in the hopes that it could then be used to advance the cause?  Now of course the primary recipient of Democrat outrage is now, and always will be, the National rifle Association (NRA).  But I’m thinking that if there truly is an interest on the left to determine who it is that is truly at fault, they really need look no further than the nearest mirror.  And let’s face it, if stricter guns laws were truly the answer to gun violence, would not Chicago be the safest place on the planet, instead of the planet’s murder capital.

And Democrats now have every ‘fake news’ organization out there screaming the stricter gun laws are the only possible way to finally rid us of these mass shooting tragedies.  This is how they exploit a tragedy.  What they either don’t realize, or simply choose to ignore, is that there is no gun control law that would have prevented this tragedy.  The shooter was using a machine gun which is illegal to own.  All the stupid laws that the Democrats, and their allies in the media, continue to come up with only effect law abiding citizens because the simple fact is that criminals will ALWAYS be able to get any type of gun they want illegally.  And by continuing to go after our law abiding citizens they reveal what it is that they are really up to.

And in their continuing effort to never let a good tragedy go to waste, the Democrats wasted precious little time in tripping all over themselves in the effort to be the first to get to the nearest microphone in order to exploit the nation’s latest mass shooting.  And a perfect example of someone who exhibits such a warped mentality as this would be none other than Democrat Senator Chris Murphy, who called for pushing gun control immediately following a mass shooting in Las Vegas, and then went so far as to actually say that he believes any grieving period is nothing more than a “tool of the gun lobby.”  Now just how sick do you suppose one has to be to make such a brutally ignorant comment?  But then he is a Democrat, so perhaps that explains it.

And so it was that during an appearance on MS(LSD)’s ‘Morning Joe’ the esteemed Mr. Murphy said, “It’s a very convenient tool of the gun lobby to say that there’s got to be a 24-48 hour waiting period before we talk about change.” He ultimately blamed Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock for Sunday’s massacre, but also blamed federal and state laws.  He went on to say, “The reality is that much of it is rooted in the evil inside this one individual, but much of it is also rooted in our laws, which allowed him to get his hands on weapons that are illegal in almost every other civilized country.”  And he reiterated his support for banning semi-automatic rifles and bump stocks, and said he wants to start pushing for these changes “immediately.”

And it was this very same imbecile, Mr. Murphy, who went on to say, “Maybe he still would have taken a pistol and shot through the window. Killed perhaps dozens below. But it would have been difficult without the semi-automatic weapon and the modifications that are still legal to this day, in this country. So I think we’ve got to talk about change immediately.”   Mass shootings represent one percent of gun casualties in America, he claimed and said murders with 10 or more victims have doubled since an assault weapon ban expired.  Murphy continued to name the infamous “gun lobby” as Public Enemy number one, and believes the lobby purposely focuses on the most recent mass shooting to distract from past tragedies.

He said, “I think the gun lobby wants you, in the wake of a mass shooting to only talk about the policy changes that would have affected the shooting that happened the day before.”  And, of course, he went on to compare Paddock to Newtown, Conn., shooter Adam Lanza, claiming mass shooters would think twice if they were denied rifles and tactical gear.  He said, “In Newtown we ask ourselves whether Adam Lanza would ever have walked into that school if he didn’t have tactical weaponry.”  And he concluded, “There is a false bizarre kind of courage that comes with attaching yourself to these kinds of very powerful weapons, and there is a question as to whether these shooters would ever take up position if all they had was a pistol.”

So perhaps the ever-so-sophisticated Mr. Murphy might want to tell us exactly what laws could have been enacted that would have prevented this latest tragedy?  Do we need laws to force people to buy guns with a background check?  Oops, this guy did buy his guns after submitting a background check.  Maybe we need to force gun manufactures into making guns that can’t be changed over to fully automatic?  Oops again, they already do that.  So just what, exactly, is this clown’s point?  Does he even have one?  Personally, I don’t believe he has a point other than to advance the claim that if only we had stricter guns laws there would never be another of this type of tragedy.  This boob is the Poster Child for the politically demented.

Murphy is another radical leftwing socialist Democrat who hates the Constitution and individual liberty.  He’s little more than a political grandstander who, like all Democrats, is always seeking only to create some level of political advantage out of any tragedy.  Murphy is as deranged as those who decide to pick up these weapons and kill innocent people.  And what he and his fellow Democrats seek to accomplish is the complete removal of guns from law abiding citizens, which would result in nothing more than an escalating body count which would then be further exploited to put all those who manufacture guns out of business.  Which would leave the American people as being little more than sitting ducks against an increasingly tyrannical government.

And keep in mind that if Democrats are so desperate in their attempt to advance their call for complete gun control and confiscation, might they go to the extreme of orchestrating attacks like the one in Virginia on Republicans practicing baseball or even this Las Vegas massacre?  Frankly, I wouldn’t put anything past them and all you have to do is to see listen to liberals like this boob Chris Murphy who will say absolutely anything, and do anything, to be relevant just before an election years and especially when he’s up for reelection.  And personally, I’m wondering just how long it’s going to be before we find out that this Paddock guy was a registered Democrat.  Or, is that one of the facts that our media folks will manage to keep concealed?



So, riddle me this, “What’s the only thing faster than a speeding bullet?”  And while I am not referring to any superhero, what I am referring to is the willingness, or dare I say eagerness, of supposed journalists to jump the ‘gun’ (no pun intended) and begin to assign blame before knowing any of the facts.  Here we have yet another instance where our state-controlled media demonstrated an affection for committing journalistic malpractice as they sought to report on what they assumed to be another mass shooting, choosing to rely on early, and what would prove to be highly inaccurate, information.  And in so doing national outlets reported that a shooter was loose on campus at Ohio State.  In reality, 18-year old Abdul Razak Ali Artan attacked and injured 11 students using both a butcher knife and his Honda Civic.

But rather than to waste time waiting for all the facts to be known before rushing to judgement, as is usually the case, members of our esteemed state-controlled media quickly jumped into action and typed up who it was that they perceived as being the obvious villain here.  And that was, of course, firearms owners and organizations like the NRA who oppose increased gun regulation.  And it was even before first responders had sounded the all clear that Vox had labeled the ambush “the Ohio State shooting.”  Yahoo News took the next step, reporting that the attack “spurs a look at Ohio gun laws.”  And pundits all across the Twittersphere blamed the American gun culture for yet another mass shooting that had never happened.  This is what my dear old Dad used to call, “Shooting from the hip.”

And then when Ohio Gov. John Kasich tweeted that “our hearts and prayers go out to the Ohio State University,” it was a rather snarky Cosmo editor, Amy Odell, who apparently thought it would be a good idea to take a completely unnecessary potshot at the Republican.  And so it was this genius that replied, “Well, now’s a good time to review your stance on gun control.”  Now as it just so happens it turns out that one person actually did have a firearm on campus on Monday, it just wasn’t the attacker.  It was Officer Alan Horujko, the guy who shot Artan bring to an ended his terrorist rampage.  Ultimately, it was the good guy with a gun who stopped the bad guy armed with a butcher knife.  In the process, he saved countless students from harm.  But that wasn’t enough to slow anti-gun hysteria.

And in what I guess was an attempt at being clever, Dan Gross, the president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, remarked, “Thank God he didn’t have a gun.”  Atta boy Dan, you’re a genuine douche bag!  And it was before that we heard from Adam Feldman of, where else but, the New York Times who actually gave thanks that eight still-recovering students had ‘only been hacked with a butcher’s cleaver’.  This moron, Feldman, tweeted, “What’s happened at Ohio State is terrible.”  And then added, “But ‘mass stabber leaves 8 people with non-life-threatening injuries’ is why gun control matters.”  Huh?  I guess that’s what must be commonly referred to as being ‘Liberal Logic?’  Because that idiotic statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  And who but a liberal thinks this way?

The actual crime data, which proves false any relationship between gun ownership and gun crime, rarely makes the nightly news.  It’s only when a story bleeds, and fits an anti-gun narrative, does it ever lead. That’s a problem because it deliberately misleads the electorate.  Of course mistakes do happen in journalism. The industry has an entire orthodoxy and doctrine on corrections and retractions.  But after Monday’s attack it’s clear that many in the media were far more interested in advancing a narrative than they were in reporting on what actually happened.  Why else would Vox have an entire section about mass shootings locked and loaded on their front page hours after the attack?  Because they let their bias overshadow the facts.  But this time they got burned, and rather badly.

And based on their reading early and inaccurate reports, two Democrat senators doubled down on their calls for more gun control.  Chris Murphy complained that after the Ohio State shooting there had been one attack per week.  Once it was clear a gun had not been used, Murphy was quick to delete his tweet.  And it was Timmy Kaine who also leapt to Twitter minutes after the attack was reported in an attempt to turn the attack into a discussion on gun control by tweeting out a message reading, “Deeply saddened by the senseless act of gun violence at Ohio State this morning. Praying for the injured and the entire Buckeye community.”   But he earned for himself a little embarrassment when, a few hours later, it was revealed that the attacker used a car and a knife, but no gun.

Both of these stellar Democrats are avid supporters of increased gun control, so therefore their knee jerk response to this tragedy should come as no surprise.  And, you know, all they really succeeded in doing was to make themselves appear as a couple of spineless political opportunists.  And Twitter users were just as quick to take failed Democrat vice presidential candidate Kaine to task for politicizing the attack before he had any of the facts at hand.  Some accused him of trying to use a crime to push his anti-gun agenda, while others pointed out how during the recent presidential campaign Timmy and Hitlery both had claimed Trump was unfit because he often spoke without knowing the facts.  But the voters let it be known who it was that THEY thought was unfit, and it appears the voters were right.

One response to Timmy’s idiotic Tweet said, “The only guns used were by the police. Try and confirm before you politicize.”  And another said, “You criticized Trump for making statements before receiving all the facts. News just confirmed killer used car and knife. No gun.”  And still another said, “Deeply saddened by your senseless statement on gun violence in response to a knife attack by a Somali suspect.”  And about two hours later, Timmy tweeted a second message reading, “Updated reports say attacker used a vehicle & knife. Horrifying & senseless. Relieved the scene is secure & praying for victims’ recovery.”  Perhaps Timmy should have waited just a bit to hear more of the facts before shooting off his big fat mouth.  In doing what he did he only came across as being someone who can’t be trusted to tell the truth.

And have you ever noticed how it is that Democrats, and right down to the very last one, seem to be completely unable to differentiate between an attack by someone who identifies himself, or in some cases herself, as a soldier of Allah (terrorism) and an attack perpetrated by some generic, and usually a liberal, nutball.  It seems as if their first response is always to blame guns, as well as law abiding gun owners, for all society’s ills or to whine about how it was that the majority of Americans simply don’t buy into their propaganda that stricter gun laws would fix everything.  And maybe if Hitlery had not been the worst corrupt candidate to ever run for president, Timmy might have actually received the level of scrutiny that he deserved for being such a leftist douchebag.

And you know, with the current state of the Democrat Party being what it is, I wouldn’t be the least surprised to see this halfwit, Timmy, trying to make a run for President on his own come 2020.  And to think that this guy could very well have been our vice president, and possibly even our president had Hitlery won and then gone on to croak while still in office is a pretty scary thought.  But luckily for us God was still watching out for our country and thankfully he had not yet chosen to abandon us and therefore allowed us, recounts notwithstanding, to dodge a rather sizable bullet that was headed right between our eyes.  Our country would have never survived a Hiterly presidency and God, in his infinite wisdom, knew that.  But what this latest tragedy makes clear is that we believe the Democrats and the media at our own peril.



If eroding Americans’ Second Amendment right is your thing, then I suppose your choice for president this election year is pretty simple.  That would be Hitlery, who, by the way, just received the backing of 20 groups who support stricter gun control.  I always find myself questioning what actually motivates someone to be in favor of forcing the citizens of this country to become utterly defenseless, not only within a society that has become increasingly dangerous, but also against a government that has grown increasingly powerful and intrusive.  And it would seem that there is a mountain of evidence available that would show that stricter gun laws have no effect on increasing public safety.  That’s just part of the continuing propaganda effort we see coming from the left.

According to, Hitlery, who has a ‘broad package’ of gun control initiatives to harass law-abiding gun owners and do nothing to stop violent crime — oops, I mean initiatives to curb gun violence, already had the support of the Brady Campaign, former New York Mayor ‘Nanny Mike’ Bloomberg’s ‘Everytown for Gun Safety’, and former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords’ ‘Americans for Responsible Solutions’.  A coalition of 16 more smaller groups endorsed her Tuesday as well, including the Newtown Action Alliance, States United to Prevent Gun Violence Action Fund, CeaseFire Pennsylvania, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence, and Rabbis Against Gun Violence.  I’d be more than a little curious to know from whom it is that these groups acquire their funding, from some pretty shady sources I’ll bet.

And it was someone by the name of Po Murray, described as being the head of the Newtown Action Alliance, told via an email: “The 2016 Election is one of the most consequential for the gun violence prevention movement.  For four long years since the Sandy Hook School shooting, Congress has failed to take any action to strengthen the nation’s lax gun laws. Since that tragic day, Congressional inaction has contributed to 400,000 Americans being killed or injured by guns and increasing incidents of mass shootings that have devastated more and more communities across the nation.”  The nation’s lax gun laws?  Really?  And what is someone named Po likely to know about the state of our nation’s gun laws?  Obviously, not very much if she’d advocating for even more laws.

In addition, the Coalition to Stop Handgun Violence issued an endorsement of Hitlery on Wednesday, one that praised her platform of gun restrictions and blasted Trump in a statement also emailed to “Donald Trump has embraced the gun lobby’s irresponsible rhetoric and policies that contribute to our nation’s gun violence epidemic. The NRA has broken its campaign advertising record by spending at least $26 million to help elect Trump. At best, a Trump administration would simply accept the status quo on gun violence in America. At worst, Trump and the NRA would dismantle existing laws that keep guns out of dangerous hands and instigate violence.”  Well this group certainly has the propaganda spiel down.  Too bad they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about!

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Everytown has contributed $61,694 to Hitlery while Bloomberg’s Independence USA PAC has donated $788,926. Second Amendment groups like the NRA and their Institute for Legislative Action have spent at least $26.8 million in support of Trump. Two other large gun rights groups, Gun Owners of America and the National Association of Gun Rights, have restricted their spending this year to congressional races.  Which, I suppose, may look like a good idea paper but I question the wisdom of such a decision.  Because over the course of the last 6 years how many times have we all been lied to by those running for either the Senate or the House?  How many times have they promised to stop Barry, and done nothing?  Hence, we have now have Trump.

Look, the founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power would likely become corrupt and then seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies.  It’s not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a populace that is much easier to control.  Thus, the Second Amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution.  And it must be preserved and safeguarded at all costs.  These idiots seem to think that the Supreme Court or some executive order illegally issued will be able to do what they cannot get done in Congress, i.e., a gun ban.  The problem with that is there are 45-50 million gun owners in America with 400 million guns. What do they plan to do if we all simply refuse to comply with their mandates?

Or are the anti-gun loons really stupid enough to think that every gun owner in America will simply fall into line because that’s what they always do?  I hate to be the one to have to tell them but most of us who do own a gun will likely be telling them to go piss up a rope!  Because most, if not all, of them have no real concept of how intensely many of us view those which are deemed to be our GOD-given rights or that living in freedom is more important than anything else.  And where is it, exactly, that these clones came up with their claim of 400,000 Americans being killed or injured by guns.  As is usually the case with these people, whatever the cause, did they just pull that number out of their collective ass and assume that it would be believed?  Do they really think that most Americans are that stupid?

So anyway, we have 20 gun control groups now endorsing Hitlery. Big f*cking deal.  These groups, along with Democrat politicians at any level, want to see the Second Amendment gutted forever. We already know when it comes of strict guns laws, these laws are not working in cities and states controlled by Democrats.  I’m still waiting for a solution to the car trunk loophole by some Democrat politician.  But I know they have none when it comes to buying a gun off of the street illegally, which is how criminals get their guns.  What is needed is not MORE gun laws, but the enforcing of those gun laws that are already on the books.  But see, if we were to actually start doing that, then there would be less violence occurring and therefore less of an apparent need for MORE, and stricter, gun laws.

The more accurate claim, as long as we’re going to be throwing numbers around, is 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms in a country the population of which is 330 million, give or take a few hundred-thousand.  Now after doing the math that’s roughly 0.0000925% of the population that die from gun related actions each and every year.  Statistically speaking, that’s relative insignificant amount!  But the part of the story that is never told is what the actual breakdown of those deaths actually are.  Which is: 65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws, 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified, 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons, and 3% are accidental discharge deaths.

So technically when taking all things into account, “gun violence” is not really 30,000 annually, but is actually 5,100.  Still too many for our anti-gun friends?  Because if so, let’s just see how those deaths are dispersed across the entire nation.  And in using the most recent data available what we would find is that there were 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago, 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore, 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit and 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years).  So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.  All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.  So it’s simple really, gun control is about ‘people control’; nothing more, nothing less.  And that’s what we need to be focused on.



While we have heard much during this presidential campaign about the need for much stricter gun laws, a recent poll from Chapman University seems to show that Americans fear gun control, Obamacare, and tornadoes far more than they fear the next mass shootings occurring.  In fact, the poll shows that Americans are more fearful of reptiles and extinction than of gun crime.  The poll–released October 11–shows that “corrupt government officials” are Americans’ greatest fear. That is followed by a “terror attack, not having enough money for the future, and terrorism.”  Fifth on the list of things that scare Americans most are “government restrictions on firearms and ammunition.”  And you have to go a long way down the list–yes, past Obamacare, reptiles, tornadoes, and even the threat of extinction–before you finally get to fear of a mass shooting or other crimes committed with a gun.

Here are some of the other things people fear more than mass shootings:

  • People I love dying
  • Economic/financial collapse
  • Identity theft
  • People I love becoming seriously ill
  • Biological warfare
  • Government tracking of personal data
  • High medical bills
  • The US will be involved in another world war
  • Global warming and climate change
  • Nuclear weapons attack
  • Cyber-terrorism
  • Being hit by a drunk driver
  • Pollution of oceans, rivers and lakes
  • Pandemic or major epidemic
  • Corporate tracking of personal information
  • Pollution of drinking water

After pollution, Americans fear “break-ins”–and although break-ins do not require a gun, they represent the first thing on the list that could involve one. Following break-ins, Americans fear “widespread civil unrest” and “nuclear accident/meltdown.”  And then, finally, a “random/mass shooting.”  Think about it, “Corrupt government officials” are Americans’ number one fear, gun control is number five, and way down on the list–at number 30–is fear of a mass shooting. Such a list is encouraging, because it indicates that Americans have yet to buy into the left’s relentless talk about how unsafe America is and how desperately Americans need government to come save them.  And I would argue that this poll also provides to those who are having a difficult time deciding whom to vote for, or those thinking about just staying home, one less reason to vote for Hitlery and a little incentive to get out and vote.

And I think it would be safe to say that if we’re going to be genuinely serious about our attempt to stop gun violence, then what needs to be done is really relatively simple.  Because, you see, all we really need to do is to completely disarm all Democrats. And why is it that I say that?  Well, because:  Ft Hood Shooter – Registered Democrat. Columbine – both families were progressive liberal Democrats. Virginia Tech Shooter – Registered Democrat – Wrote hate mail to Bush. Connecticut School Shooter – Registered Democrat; hated Christians. Colorado Theater Shooter – progressive liberal Democrat; staff worker for the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street!  It all seems pretty cut and dry to me.  So there you go, disarm the Democrats and our problem is solved.  And it would also make it much easier to identify those with mental issues if were to simply check to see who it is that’s a registered Democrat.

So now that it’s been confirmed that Americans fear big government more than they fear domestic terrorist attackers I think we had best be prepared for even more contrived terrorist attacks in America because that is what D.C. wants us to do so they can have justification to take away more of our freedoms in the name of “national security”.  They need crime and violence with a deafening discrimination campaign echoing through the state-controlled media in an attempt to justify even more gun control schemes!  They now have less than 30 days to try to stage something to backdrop behind Hitlery and her pledge to restrict gun rights.  Everyone needs to keep their powder dry and to be vigilant!  And take someone shooting for their first time!  We as a nation are better than the screw ups in the Democrat Party and their many willing accomplices in the state-controlled media!!  Our country needs us as it has never needed us before!


Gun Control 23

When it comes to the issue of guns in America, Democrats seem pretty sure they know what the answer is, they’re just not sure what the question is.  And it’s in the effort to solve this dilemma of theirs that the advocates for more gun control tend to recycle the same old tired talking points when arguing why it is that the federal government should curtail the peoples’ Second Amendment rights.

The anti-gun lobby deploys a wide range of straw-man arguments, like the Founding Fathers considered “arms” to mean single-loader muskets, and the “militia” to be the only legitimate custodian of these arms.  In more recent years, the no-guns crowd has even called for outright confiscation.  So what we’ve done here is to put together a list of the five most used talking points from gun control advocates.

  1. The Founding Fathers could never have imagined semi-automatic guns of today: Gun control advocates like to argue the Founders never envisioned semi-automatic weapons when they crafted the Second Amendment. Gun controllers say the founders only had muskets in mind. But William Atwater, a military technology expert, said, “The idea that firearms technology was static during the 18th/19th Century is bunk.”  And Mr. Atwater went on to say, “They had witnessed huge advances in firearms technology — i.e. matchlock giving way to the wheel lock, which, in turn gave way to the flint lock.”  And he added, “Each and every one of these developments were huge in their day.”

The Washington Post said in a June article the “typical firearms of the day were muskets and flintlock pistols.” The Post writer further argued muskets “could hold a single round at a time, and a skilled shooter could hope to get off three or possibly four rounds in a minute of firing.”

That’s just false. There were several examples of “repeating” guns that were capable of firing dozens of rounds in quick succession. The Founders were well aware of guns capable of firing many rounds in under a minute.

A man by the name of Joseph Belton even wrote a letter to the Continental Congress in 1777 — the Second Amendment wasn’t ratified until 1791 — and tried to sell them on a rifle that could fire “eight balls one after another, in eight, five or three seconds of time.”

  1. The Second Amendment was for militias, not individuals: Gun control advocates have long argued that the Second Amendment is about arming militias, not about individuals. Quotes taken directly from the Founders, however, seem to be at odds with such claims.

“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers,” George Mason wrote to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in June of 1788.

While Thomas Jefferson wrote in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, “No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

And Samuel Adams, at the Massachusetts Ratifying Convention in 1788, said, “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”

  1. We need more gun regulations: Gun control proponents often like to say, “if only there were more gun laws on the books, we could prevent more crimes.” But the opposite seems true in the real world.  Chicago, for example, has some of the nation’s toughest gun laws, but it also has a high rate of homicide. The Daily Beast found in 2015 that certain sections of Chicago actually have higher homicide rates than some of the world’s deadliest countries.

West Garfield Park had a homicide rate of 116 per 100,000 people in 2014, according to The Daily Beast. For comparison, Honduras, the world leader in homicides, had a rate of 90 per 100,000. Chicago’s West Englewood neighborhood saw a homicide rate of 73.3 per 100,000 in 2014, which puts it ahead of the country with the second highest rate of homicides, Venezuela.  The U.S. average is about five per 100,000 people.

  1. Gun confiscation worked in Australia: Anti-gun activists, such as our friend Matt Damon, often point to Australia as an example of how the U.S. could take away people’s guns. Australia enacted the National Firearms Agreement following a mass shooting in 1996. The law fully outlawed semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and enacted strict new regulations. Australia also held a massive mandatory gun buyback program, and bought back approximately 1 million guns from its citizens.

Australia did see a decline in gun deaths after the new laws and mandatory buyback program went into effect, but the National Review pointed out in 2015 that the gun death rate had been declining for 15 years before the 1996 legislation.  While gun deaths declined, other violent crimes went up in Australia.

Reason Magazine published a piece in March, arguing armed robbery went up after the confiscation. Steven Crowder, a social and political commentator, published an article in 2015 that shows sexual assault also went up following the confiscation program.

  1. More guns mean more crime: Do more guns mean more crime? That’s what gun control advocates often argue.  But once again, the data simply doesn’t back up such claims.  There were approximately 310 million guns in the U.S. in 2009, by 2013 that number had jumped to 357 million, according to a Union Leader article, which used data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

So, violent crime and murder rates must have risen accordingly, right?  Not so much. The FBI released data that shows violent crime and murder rates in America have declined since the 1990s. The murder rate nationally was 8.2 per 100,000 people in 1995. That number was nearly cut in half by 2014, to a rate of 4.5 murders per 100,000 people.

Max Ehrenfreund of The Washington Post and Wonkblog wrote in a 2015 piece: “Even as a certain type of mass shooting is apparently becoming more frequent, America has become a much less violent place.”

The Democrat Party may be in for what could be a very sizable surprise come this November because women now make up a huge block of gun buyers and gun training courses. Even some gays have finally realized that guns can definitely help them out. Every course that offered free courses to homosexuals or teachers filled up multiple classes because the need was so great.

I’m still waiting for the Democrat Party to start putting “Gun free zone” placards on their members’ properties. They should definitely practice what they preach.  Of course, there is a very simple solution for bring about any mass shootings here in America.  Really all you would have to do is to simply ban all Democrats from owning guns, they’re responsible for 97% of the mass shootings. Problem solved.