Climate Change 32

It has been for decades that the ‘Chicken Littles’ of the world have been sounding the ‘climate change’ alarm.  First it was about a coming ice age and more recently it’s about how we need to be more concerned, worried even, about what they once described as ‘global warming’ but now describe it in far more generic terms as mere ‘climate change’ or even ‘climate disruption.’  But how it’s described by those on the left it is really unimportant for the very simply reason that it’s all nothing more than one grand work of political fiction and nothing more.  Absolutely nothing.

I can say that because it has been over the course of those many decades that those in the ‘scientific’ climate community as well as the many in the so-called environmental ‘movement’ have not gotten even one prediction correct, and they now have a perfect record of getting 41 predictions spectacularly wrong.  In other words, on at least 41 occasions, these so-called ‘experts’ have predicted some terrible environmental catastrophe was imminent, and it just never quite materialized.  Not once have these alarmists had one of their predictions come true.

Think about that, these so-called experts are now 0 for 41 in their predictions, yet those of us who are skeptical of prediction number 42, the one that says unless we immediately convert to socialism and allow Alexandria Occasional-Crazy to control and organize our lives the planet will become uninhabitable, we are commonly referred to as ‘flat-earthers.’ Why would any sane person ever listen to someone with a 0-41 record?  Why would we completely restructure our economy and sacrifice our personal freedom for “experts” who are 0-41, who have never once gotten it right?

Here is the source for numbers 1-27. As you will see, we are not talking crackpots, but scientific studies and media reports on “expert” predictions. The sources for numbers 28-41 are not listed but can be easily located online.

  1. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
  2. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
  3. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
  4. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
  5. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
  6. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
  7. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
  8. 1974: Another Ice Age?
  9. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
  10. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
  11. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
  12. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
  13. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
  14. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
  15. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
  16. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
  17. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
  18. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
  19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
  20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
  21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
  22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
  23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
  24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
  25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
  26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
  27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’

And then we have the following cockamamie predictions:

  1. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
  2. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
  3. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
  4. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
  5. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
  6. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
  7. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
  8. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
  9. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
  10. 2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
  11. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
  12. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
  13. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
  14. 1970s: Killer Bees!

So what we have here is a pretty piss-poor record for something we’ve been told is now, and has been for a very long time, “settled science” about an apocalypse that we’re told will arrive in little over a decade.  Only a fool comes running after the 42nd crying of wolf.  Everywhere I can think of weather is behaving exactly as weather always has, unpredictably.  Think about it, how often is it that your local weather guy, or gal, ever gets it right.  Being a TV weather-guesser is the only job I know of where you can be wrong 90% of the time and still keep your job.

The world in which we live is constantly changing, and climate is not one that is in anyway, static.  So why is it that those on the left are always so much in a hurry to declare that mankind is responsible for any and all changes that may occur?  It’s because mankind has absolutely nothing to do with these changes other than how those on the left are then able to exploit those changes to further what is an agenda that is very much hazardous to America by allowing those on the left to acquire even more political power and therefore more control over the ‘governed.’

Now of course those on the left will say, or do, anything they have to in their continuing quest for power.  And of course they will aggressively deny that their supposed concerns have absolutely anything to do with anything other than their concern for future generations.  And if you believe that I have some prime oceanfront property in Arizona I can let you have very cheap.  The person who thinks humans can alter the climate/weather in any measurable amount is either a nut, a moron, a scam artist or someone who has simply refused to do their homework.

The Globalists want to control the world. To accomplish this they require money and lots of it (Carbon Tax). They also require a perceived threat that is global in nature (climate control). They also require a mechanism to propagate their 24/7/365 propaganda (MSM). And they require the institutions to dumb down and indoctrinate our youth (DOE, Universities, Public Schools, Revised History, Revised science). They need to destroy the nucleus of western culture (the family).  Next they need to turn people against one another (Democrats/identity politics).

And, AND, they need to create as much social chaos as possible (illegal immigration and no borders). They need to prevent the citizens from revolting (gun confiscation). Lastly, they need to overthrow the government, the Constitution and the will of the people (Attempted coup of President Trump).  Folks, it’s all playing out right in front of our eyes. All people need to do is to open their eyes and have the courage to accept the reality.  And that is what all of these climate zealots are desperate to keep from happening.  They don’t want anyone pulling back the curtain.


Democrats 88

So riddle me this?  What role is it that Donald Trump can be said to have played in making Baltimore, Chicago, San Francisco or practically any large city in America into the Hell Hole that most of them have now become?  Frankly, the answer is easy and requires very little time to ponder.  Because the answer is…ABSOLUTEYL NOTHING! Because what has caused these once thriving communities to become little more than cesspools of violence, crime, drugs and all manner of corruption is the very obvious fact that they have been controlled by Democrats for what has been DECADES!

Which leads me to yet another rather perplexing question.  Why is it that despite there being overwhelming evidence staring them right in the face, evidence that shows, and very clearly so, the consequences of placing Democrats in charge, that among the America people there is ANYONE still willing to vote for ANY Democrat for anything other than perhaps dog catcher?  Time and time again we have witnessed how it is that everything the Democrat Party touches almost immediately turns to shit!  And yet there continues to be those people who still vote for them.

Democrats can blow their own horn all they want, about how it is that they are the party of ‘diversity’ (whatever the Hell that means), about how they are so inclusive and welcoming, about how they are the protectors of the poor and the downtrodden, or about how they simply don’t care what gender you want to call yourself or even if you want to murder your baby after it’s been born.  Because, apparently, those things are more important, much more so than is being able to have a job that allows you to be less dependent on government and better able to provide for you and your family.

I’m sure no one would be all that shocked to find out that the Top 10 worst cities in the country are all currently being run by Democrat mayors and have been dominated by Democrats for decades.  And they would be:


2.Los Angeles

3.New York

4.Washington, D.C.

5.San Francisco






The last time Chicago elected a Republican mayor was in 1927.  San Francisco last elected a Republican mayor in 1959. Detroit last elected a Republican mayor in 1958. Philadelphia last elected a Republican mayor in 1952. Cleveland last elected a Republican mayor in 1985. Denver last elected a Republican mayor in 1959.  Baltimore last elected a Republican mayor in 1963. Nancy Pelosi’s father, Thomas D’Alesandro Jr.,  served as Baltimore’s Democrat mayor from 1947 to 1959. Her brother, Thomas  D’Alesandro III, served as mayor from 1967 to 1971.

Washington, D.C. has never had an elected Republican mayor.  Both New York City and Los Angeles have been dominated by Democrats for decades, with three notable exceptions. Republican Rudy Giuliani served as mayor of New York City from 1994 to 2001, and Republican Ralph Riordan served as mayor of Los Angeles from 1993 to 2001. Michael Bloomberg was a Democrat who changed his party affiliation to Republican before he was elected mayor of New York City in 2001. He ran an independent when he was re-elected to a third term in 2009.

And if you’ve been paying even the slightest attention to what those Democrats now running for president have been proposing, i.e. open borders, Medicare for All, free healthcare for those in this country illegally, the ‘Green New Deal’, or any of the many other insane proposals that have thus far been presented, you can very plainly see, or should, what electing any of these Democrats would bring about.  And that would, of course, be the turning of our entire country into something that would end up very closely resembling places like Baltimore, Detroit or any other big city.

Socialism is what is being practiced in many of our largest cities and has been for some time.  And apparently Democrats now feel they are ready to take it on the road and bring it to your hometown.  This despite the fact that Socialism is a philosophy doomed to fail virtually from the get-go, and is guaranteed to produce nothing but poverty and abject misery for all those forced to live under it.  And if you doubt me look toward ANY of our largest cities to see just how well Socialism has worked there.   And yet, Democrats still see it as being the ideal governing/economic philosophy.

So the moral of this story should be obvious.  And it would of course be that if you’re someone who’s in favor of having your country turned into what would be the equivalent of any of these crime infested cities then, by all means, vote for a Democrat.  But if you would prefer your country to be something other than just one huge cesspool overflowing with all manner of vermin, human and otherwise, then you might not want to vote Democrat.  While the choice would seem to be pretty clear, there will always be those who refuse to accept what’s right in front of them.


Democrats 69

If there is one thing that I’ve learned in my over 66 years of life here in the good old U.S. of A. it’s that those who attempt to label you a racist are, more often than not, are the ones who are the racists.  Regarding the Democrats it’s when they have no idea how to make this country better it’s then that they ALWAYS resort to calling the opposition nothing more than a bunch racists who wish nothing more than to return this country to the glory days of slavery.  Which always strikes me as being a bit odd coming from members of the party that dreamt up slavery in the first place.

Which brings me to last Sunday’s very bizarre parade of Democrats who appeared on a number of the Sunday shows.  It was on an pathetic episode of CBS’s “Face the Nation” that anyone who happened to tune in would have been subjected to failed vice-presidential candidate Timmy ‘The Commie’ Kaine as he once again demonstrated how thoroughly bankrupt the Democrat Party has become when it comes to how best to make America better, as he did nothing more than to accuse President Trump of having made a “concerted effort” to use race to divide people.

Timmy said, “What I think I’m most concerned about with this president is his pension to divide us, to attack people because they’re immigrants, to attack people because of their religion, to attack minorities, to use vulgar language to describe countries where people come who might be Latino or African. There is a concerted effort that he is been engaged in to divide people including dividing based on race. Nowhere was that more obvious, nowhere, than in the aftermath of Charlottesville.”  Right, President Trump is the one trying to divide Americans based on race.

When asked if the president is racist, Timmy said, “I don’t know him. I have no idea about who he is as a person, whether it’s a sincere feeling or whether he thinks it gets him some political edge or gain, I don’t know the answer. But I don’t know which of those two is worse. If it’s not your view, but you do it to try to get a political edge and try to stoke division, in some ways that’s every bit as morally bad as holding views that are bigoted or race.”  Let’s face it, it’s the Democrat Party that works tirelessly to divide Americans by gender, class, sexual preference and, yes, RACE!

So anyway, despite admitting that he doesn’t really know who the president is ‘as a person’ ‘Little Timmy’ still feels quite comfortable, even justified, in calling out President Trump as a racist.  And quite frankly, it’s in so doing the ‘Little Timmy’ actually tells us much more about himself, and about his entire party, that he does about the president.  Look, this is exactly the sort of stuff that Democrats ALWAYS resort to whenever they have nothing else.  And it’s as long as the American people continue to fall for this garbage, that the Democrats will continue to do it.

‘Little Timmy’ whined, “He used vulgar language to describe certain countries. He uses unfair stereotypes.  He will suggest that everybody who comes to the border is a member of MS13, give me a break. Statistics show that is not true. When somebody perpetuates a stereotype that is false, you have to ask why are they doing that? And I think he is stoking division. And it’s against folks from third world countries, folks whose skin color are different than his, folks whose religion he doesn’t approve of.”  This is all nothing more than pure political BS, and Timmy knows it!

Meanwhile, over on MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” it was Nancy Pelosi again proving what a waste of skin she is when she said, “We’re going backward, and the president with all of his statements is the master of the dog whistle. Everything he has done, whether it’s taking babies out of the arms of their moms, whether it’s issues that relate to health care in our country, access to services and the rest is  — his whole thing is ‘Make America White Again.’ That’s his thing. He can say a nice thing today in a tweet, but the fact is his actions speak louder than his words.”

And then we had that well-known racist, Democrat Elijah Cummings who, during an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” very confidently declared that President Trump had not been a man of his word.  Cummings said, “I think it’s a low bar for the president of the United States to simply say he’s against racism. He’s got to do better than that. He’s got to address the people who are espousing racist type comments and doing racist type acts, white supremacy. Seems like he can’t say those words. But I think he can do better.”  Such comments are as ignorant as they are dangerous.

Cummings said, “It’s one thing to say things, it’s another thing when we look at the direction that you’re going and see that the very things that you say that you stand for, you undermine through your actions. For example, I believe that he is about the business of suppressing the vote. I look at the way he has dealt with health care, taking away health care for so many Americans, and I look at the way he has treated, and his administration has treated, the young immigrant children and their parents. That is horrendous. And so when I hear the words, words ring hollow with me.”

He went on to say, “I look at a person’s actions, and you can label them however you want to label them. But I do not believe that President Trump has been a man of his word. I kept going back to his inauguration speech and I ask the president right now to go back and read his inauguration speech when he talked about unity and bringing people together and how our unity will allow us to be the very best in the world. And I think he has done, through his actions, almost everything he could to take that unity and throw it away.”  Cummings is nothing more than a racist and a fraud!

So what we are now once again witnessing here are Democrats at their best, doing what it is that they feel they must in order to ensure their much heralded ‘blue wave’ continues to be a possibility.  But if President Trump is a racist wouldn’t he be like the worst racist ever?  I mean, black unemployment is now the lowest that it has been in history, wages the highest they’ve been in history and pardoning blacks wrongly accused by authorities and the legal system. President Trump’s approval rating among blacks jumps is now to 30%.  I would argue that as racists go, he kinda sucks.

At the end of the day all we really have here is nothing more than another pathetic turn in the revolving door of Liberal/’fake news’ media garbage. Don’t forget the other two fallback talking points masquerading as real news: Trump is a Russian agent and he’s mentally unstable.  The Democrats know that they can’t win a presidential election without roughly 90% of the black vote.  With more and more black Americans now believing that the president is working for their interests, the Democrats have to turn to lies about racism in an effort to get them back onto the plantation.

I think most reasonably intelligent people will agree that the ONLY people who use race in their attempt to divide us are the Democrats, and they’ve been doing it for decades. What is it that the president has done or said that divides Americans by race other than to object to over-paid thugs in the NFL who protest the National Anthem, supporting law enforcement and creating more jobs and less unemployment for black Americans? When Democrats accuse Republicans of being racists, they do so for no other reason than to encourage blacks not to vote for Republicans.

Pelosi has said President Trump wants to make America white again and it was back in 2012 that ‘Slow Joe’ Biden accused Mitt Romney of wanting to put blacks back in chains. Those statements were false and divisive and Pelosi and Biden knew that when they made them. Their intent was to cause black Americans to have negative feelings about Republicans and the long-term damage this divisive political strategy does to the nation was of no concern to them. Democrats don’t care if the nation is divided as long as it results in wins for their party on Election Day.



So, the election was almost a year ago now, and the old girl has now come up with just about every excuse imaginable for why she lost an election that she, and her many braindead followers, thought she had pretty much in the bag.  And it is in her soon to be released ‘memoir’ that she is, apparently, able to come up with even MORE excuses in her attempt to justify how it was that someone like Donald J. Trump was able to beat “the most qualified person ever to run for President of the United States.”  Because that simply was never supposed to happen!

So we’ve been told that it is in this latest recording of the trials and tribulations of Hitlery that she proceeds to unload on Democrats which, as you can well imagine, is not sitting all that well with more than a few Democrat Party officials. Excerpts from Hitlery’s 2016 campaign memoir, “What Happened”, which is set to be released next week, show Hitlery venting her frustrations about working with some of the Democrat Party’s most powerful figures leading up to her eventual defeat by President Trump.  So still she seems to be totally incapable of accepting any blame.

It’s in one passage that Hitlery even went so far as to make the claim that former president Obummer put her in a “straight-jacket” when he told her to refrain from attacking her rival, Bernie Sanders, in the Democrat primary over fears that it would divide the Democrat Party heading into the general election.  And in yet another passage that she points out that didn’t particularly like it when former vice president ‘Slow Joe’ Biden told her that she did not adequately address how the Democrat Party would help our struggling middle class.  Democrats help the middle class?  Who knew?

Hitlery also took the opportunity to mock Sanders’ many policy proposals as being “pie-in-the-sky” endeavors and called his supporters sexist.  She also complained that Sanders’ attacks on her during the primary did “lasting damage” to her shot at winning the general election.  She even went so far as to actually accuse Sanders of aiding Trump.  Sanders responded to Hitlery’s criticism this past Wednesday by simply saying that Democrats need to “look forward, not backward.”  But there are others in the party who have not been quite so forgiving of her statements.

And apparently one of those less forgiving folks was a former Hitlery fundraiser, and surrogate who played an active role, of some sort, at the Democrat convention.  And it was this particular individual who expressed the opinion held by many within the party when they said, “The best thing she could do is disappear.”  And it was this same surrogate who went on to say, “She’s doing harm to all of us because of her own selfishness. Honestly, I wish she’d just shut the f— up and go away.”  So they’re just now realizing that Hitlery thinks only about herself?

Hitlery has blamed just about everyone possible for her 2016 election loss, including former FBI Director James Comey, the Russians, the press, Obummer, and the DNC.  But what remains to be seen in this book is whether she takes any responsibility at all for losing the election.  Look, we hated Crooked Hitlery, but we ALL love ‘Sore Loser Hitlery!  She’s the worst thing to ever happen to the Democrat Party, next to Obummer.  I’m guessing that Hitlery now sees her career as being pretty much over, and has decided to take the whole damn party down with her!

I absolutely love that Hitlery continues to beat a horse that has long since been dead.  Because in the process she’s alienating people, she’s driving a wedge between the now smaller, older version of the Democrat Party and the, now growing, new version of radical leftwing Democrat Party.  And calling Bernie’s supporters sexist, that’s classic.  You go girl!  You’re doing more damage to the Democrat Party than the entire conservative movement could ever do!  Every time she opens her mouth, she reminds us of “What Happened.”  America dodged a bullet, that’s what happened!

Insisting upon embarrassing herself we see in Hitlery a woman who completely lacks any integrity or self-respect, as well as any dignity.  So embarrassing herself is the least of her many problems!  She actually thinks that people still care about her and are interested in hearing what it is she has to say.  But as we heard earlier, even her own party wants her to just go away!  She is dumber than a box of rocks!  She is nothing more than a bitter and selfish old shrew, and this book proves it.  The more she tries to explain herself, the more there is to dislike.

From those excerpts we have thus far been treated to, it would seem that the general thesis that we can draw from her book is: “I would have won if I could control literally everything and everybody.  It would be for your own good too, and you wouldn’t have a choice.”  Then she goes on to blame everybody and everything that stood in her way of controlling everybody and everything.  A textbook model of a sociopathic narcissist with extensive insecurity issues!  She will never take responsibility for anything and the more she carries on like this, the more damage she does to her party!

And am I the only one wondering how it was that anyone on the Democrat side could have ever thought that it was in any way a good idea to push her as being their candidate in the first place?  Especially with the rather long and sleazy reputation of the Clintons going back over 25+ years.  And rather than face the fact they just might have made a mistake, they opted, instead, to try to destroy Trump by digging up all manner of dirt on him and, when that failed, to simply make up dirt.  Apparently that was preferred to actually having to admit that they had screwed up.

And by the way, the more we hear those ‘popular’ leftwing buzz words like “diversity” and “inclusive”, along with the ever popular “white supremacist”, “racist”, and, of course “Nazi”, along with all those comparisons to ‘Hitler’, the more it proves our point!  And then there’s the fact that the Democrat Party has now chosen to side with every Islamic extremist group and every black hate group because of their deep-seated hatred of and for ANYTHING American. The more violence and name calling they do, the more they show their true colors.

Come on Hitlery, do you really not know “What Happened?’  Seriously?  Well, and just for starters, how about the fact that you:

  1. Sold Russia 20% of America’s uranium deposits (used for Nuclear weapons).
  2. Used a private email server that you had put in your spare bathroom at your own home to do government business on, and also the Clinton Foundation.
  3. As Secretary of State had Gaddafi killed and Libya became a breeding ground for terrorists.
  4. Lied about sniper fire you received while in Bosnia.
  5. Lied about Benghazi and about what really happened there
  6. Had the nerve to put out the propaganda that is was all about a video.
  7. Lied to the parents of the deceased Americans and Ambassador saying it was caused by that fake video.
  8. Called half the nation deplorables.
  9. Destroyed 30,000 e-mails that were to be turned over to the FBI
  10. And your criminal friends destroyed cell phones and laptops with information that would have showed you were guilty as sin.

I can’t help but wonder if all those “I’m with Her” morons would ever vote for her again.  Especially after everything we’ve all seen and heard since the election?  They probably would, because when it comes to those who routinely vote for Democrats, rarely is it that they ever look at such things as a candidate’s honesty, character and integrity when determining who it is that they should vote for.  I mean, if that were the case would a Klansman have ever been elected, or for that matter a guy who got away with murder?  Or would a rapist have been elected president?



I’m beginning to wonder at what point does accusing someone of being a ‘racist’ cease to have the desired effect?  And oddly enough how often is it that it’s the accuser who is usually the one guilty of possessing those very traits that more closely resemble the actual definition of being a racist.  Case in point is Al Franken, Senator and former Saturday Night Live (SNL) cast member, who recently accused President Trump of being a “racist” for no other reason than because he has referred to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who claims to be part Native American, as “Pocahontas.”   Left unmentioned, of course, is Franken’s own history of using ugly and rather offensive language regarding both women and minorities.  But then he’s a Democrat so is free to use such language without fear of being called on it.

And in an effort to enlighten those who may be unaware of the racist comments that Franken is known to have made, it was while speaking at the White House Correspondents Dinner back in 1996 that Franken “ridiculed [Gingrich] with a joke about his daughter’s first menstrual period.”  The joke was so out-of-bounds that then-Vice President Al Gore personally walked over to Gingrich’s table with an apology.  And it was The Weekly Standard noted that after the dinner, “Soon after, Gingrich encountered Franken and told him that, were Gingrich not a public figure, he’d have punched the comic out.”  And it was as a writer and ‘comic’ for SNL, that Franken helped craft a blatantly racist skit advertising a fake toothpaste called “Tarbrush,” meant to darken black people’s white teeth.

But it doesn’t end there, because Franken is also on record making anti-gay comments.  You see, it was also while working on SNL that Franken told Harvard University’s student newspaper, “I just don’t like homosexuals.”  And he went on to say, “If you ask me, they’re all homosexuals in the Pudding [a Harvard social club]. Hey, I was glad when that Pudding homosexual got killed in Philadelphia.”  Despite his own offensive past, Franken still had no problem calling out President Trump for his use of the term “Pocahontas” to refer to Warren.  If he had been in the room when Trump referred to Warren as Pocahontas, Franken said he would have responded: “Mr. President, with all due respect, that’s racist.”  And if you’re wondering, Franken is a member of something called the Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL).

This boob, Franken, ascended to his current position as a U.S. Senator courtesy of were typical Democrat tactics.  You see, back when he was first running for office, the Republican in the race, Norm Coleman, was said to have more votes, although all night it was said that it was too close to call.  Magically, a forgetful little old lady brought in almost three thousand votes the next morning that ‘were in the trunk of her car, where she had left them overnight’.  Now I know it was election night and there was a lot of excitement and all, but come on.  There wasn’t a Democrat, much less a Republican, who has ever believed he actually won his Senate seat.  So it’s hard to take anything he says seriously when everyone knows he cheated to get where he is today.  He needs to go to his safe space and leave the rest of us alone.

Seriously folks, if we’re gonna be honest here, what’s racist is the fact that Elizabeth Warren lied about being part American Indian so she could gain a position that obviously wasn’t meant for her at Harvard!  Then later, when it was found out that she has NO Native American ancestors (she lied to Harvard and America), she said that her family had only ‘assumed’ that they had American Indian ancestors because of their high cheekbones!  Now you all know what happens when you ‘assume’.  Oh, and not only does she and her family have no Native American ancestry, but, her family actually killed American Indians in the ‘trail of tears’!  Well, looks like that bit her in the arse.  But other Loony-Lying-Lefty-Race Baiting-Whiny-Loser-Nutjob Democrats simply ignore all of these pesky facts.

Look, like most, if not all, Democrats, Franken is nothing more than your basic communist and he always has been.  He’s been bought and paid for. He’s a disgrace to the country, and a prime example of all this is wrong with our government.  He’s a fake politician who won thanks to fake votes, and sits in a fake chair, as a fake Democrat Soros minion. It’s why he supports fake Warren and the fake “racist” meme that is by now so tired no one listens to it anymore.  Franken supports Warren, a liar, a cheat and an anti-American, who is now, apparently, the new “voice of the Democrat Party.”  God help us. With idiots like Schumer, Pelosi, Franken, Booker and Warren allowed to take part in governing America, we many recover from the last eight years.  They’re totally corrupt and have been in their positions far too long.



Why is it, do you suppose, that leftist dipshits, like Jon Leibowitz, can never bring themselves to just fade away gracefully, but, instead, feel quite compelled to hang around for what seems like damn near forever.  And why it is that I even mention it is because of the fact that Leibowitz recently chose the most inappropriate of venues to let loose with one of his trademark juvenile rants, the focus of which was Donald Trump.  Leibowitz trashed Donald Trump during Bob Woodruff’s 10th annual Stand Up for Heroes comedy fundraiser at the Theater at Madison Square Garden Tuesday night.  He began what was billed as being a stand-up routine at the event, which is held to raise money for programs meant to benefit American service members and their families by saying, “To be here tonight with you guys, my heroes, on the eve of the last American election is so exciting,”.

He said he was sure the “election was over” after the release of a leaked tape of Trump making lewd remarks about women in a conversation in 2005 with former Access Hollywood anchor Billy Bush.  He said, “Usually that is the signifier that we don’t have to pay attention anymore.”  He was among many stars who took the stage at the annual veterans’ charity event, but according to reports, Leibowitz was the only one to get overtly political with his routine.  Which should come as no surprise.  ‘Comedians’ Jerry Seinfeld and Louis C.K., who have also been critical of Trump in the past, both delivered non-political performances. Bruce Springsteen, who has called Trump a “moron” and a “tragedy” to American democracy, performed a four-song acoustic set and reportedly never mentioned the Republican presidential candidate.  And you just gotta know that it was too difficult for him to be civil.

Even on such an occasion as this Old Leibowitz just couldn’t bring himself to behave as an adult.  He saw it as being nothing more than an opportunity to display his rather questionable comedic talents and therefore dedicated almost his entire set to doing nothing more than to slam Trump.  “Rigged?” he said referencing Trump’s refrain that the media and political elites are rigging the election to favor of Hitlery.  And then he went on to say, “You live in a tower with your name on it in gold. How much better would you be if The Man wasn’t keeping you down?”  Saving some material for the Democrat presidential nominee, Leibowitz said then there’s “poor, sweet, dearest Hillary.”  Nothing he said was particularly and I couldn’t help wondering if whomever it was who thought it was a good idea to have this boob part of the show was possibly rethinking the decision to have done so after it was over.

And it was in referring to the FBI probe into Anthony Weiner and Hitlery’s emails that this boob said, “This is in-f*cking-sane! We were a beautiful, great country and now this.”   And he added, “Honestly, the first woman running for president and she’s taken down by Bush and Weiner? That’s just bad writing.”  And in what I guess was something he thought funny, he said, “To have another guy’s d*ck keep her from being president? Hillary Clinton is literally being c*ckblocked.”   And in finishing his set, Leibowitz pulled out a piece of paper and read tweets from a 2013 Twitter war of words he had engaged in with Trump, in which he called Trump “F*ckface Von Clownstick.”  Something I’m sure this sophomoric reject from a mental ward must have thought rather cute.  He concluded, “Vote wisely this November 8.”  Ya Jon, I certainly intend to.  That, Jonny, you can take to the bank!

Isn’t it sad that that’s what is sold as humor these days.  We are now living in a time where, like most things that appear upside down, the unfunny is now purported to be what’s funny.  Whenever I see this moron Leibowitz, all I see is someone struggling to stay relevant, just like that other bearded has-been, Letterman.  Oh, and Jon, I will be voting wisely on November 8th. Trump is the only sane choice at this point.  So put that in your crack-pipe and smoke it!  As a veteran myself I can’t imagine what it must have felt like to be in that audience.  Personally I would have walked out.  But then liberals have been attacking American service men and women ever since Vietnam, so this dweeb’s sick behavior should have surprised no one.  That’s the way it with these morons.  And what does it say about a comedian who feels it necessary to resort to saying the f-word over and over again?

And as someone referred to as being a comedian, Leibowitz is a guy who does nothing more than to read those things others have written for him.  Here is a guy, your very typical leftwing douche, who has never actually created anything in his entire life and self-describes his academic experience as consisting largely of memorizing someone else’s notes.  He has never managed anything, never hired and fired anyone, never had to meet a payroll, nor has he ever had to deal with government regulations which threaten to choke off his business.  All he has ever done, in his entire adult life, is criticize others (mostly his betters) and poke fun at them.  Oh, and he doesn’t take criticism very well either.  Basically what he is is a worthless individual, and humorous only to someone with a rather simplistic sense of humor and a pathetically low IQ. I apologize to anyone I might have offended.  Actually, I don’t.

Oh. And let’s not even talk about such things as debates, shall we.  Leibowitz, like so many others on the left, thinks he is just oh-so-freaking smart.  If he were to ever find himself in the position of having to debate anyone, he too would want it tightly scripted or to be fed the questions in advance just like his heroine Hitlery.  Because, you see, he, and those like him, can only survive in a society which has corrupted itself by making the mistake of elevating its “court jesters” to a level where far too many people actually give them some level of credit for ‘knowing’ what it is that they are talking about.  But the fact this that what we’re dealing with here is, and in very large part, a group of people, most of whom, barely made it out of high school.  And yet, they still feel that their opinions are so worthy of being listened to.  And far too many Americans are foolish enough to listen to them.



Initially I wasn’t going to waste my time commenting on this because if you’re not already aware of the fact that Sheila Jackson Lee is near to being the dumbest bitch on the entire planet, then I feel it’s pretty safe to say that there’s little she can say that will convince you that she is.  I can only assume that her district must be populated with what can only be the highest percentage of retards of any district not only there in the state of Texas, but in the entire country.

As most of you have likely already seen, heard, or read, it was the esteemed Ms. Jackson Lee, sporting that which closely resembled a rather sizeable head of lettuce on her left shoulder, who in making a recent appearance on MSNBC expressed her anger and frustration over Hitlery’s campaign emails that have by leaked by – wait for it – yup, you guessed it, Wikipedia.  Now who knew the free online encyclopedia, with the leftist slant, was also in the business of hacking emails?

Anyway, it was in an effort to make her displeasure known to all that this mental midget from the state of Texas said, “You know that I’m going to first of all denounce the utilization of this intrusion by Wikipedia through the Russian intrusion. This is what it’s about. Espionage just like what was said over these last couple of days. We need to be concerned about the intrusion of Russia and Putin in these elections.”  See, what’d I tell ya!  A genius, right?

Of course, what this moron meant to refer to was Wikileaks, that would be the organization led by Julian Assange that is actually behind a series of leaked emails.  While this might have been just an understandable slip of the tongue of the sort anyone who has ever appeared in the media will experience from time to time, the fact that Ms. Jackson Lee has earned for herself quite the reputation for underwhelming intelligence, indicates that this was very clearly something else entirely.

Because in the past Ms. Jackson Lee has claimed that the Constitution was 400 years old,  that Neil Armstrong planted the American flag on Mars, that Vietnam still consists of North and South (the two countries became one in 1976), and that the World Meteorological Organization should be more “inclusive of African American names” for hurricanes, offering such suggested names as “Keisha, Jamal and Deshawn.”  All rather interesting names, to say the least.

She also once asserted that, “I stand here as a freed slave because this Congress came together. Are we going to be able to do it today to free America?”  Perhaps Ms. Jackson Lee thought for a moment she was born in 1850 instead of 1950, because she was never a slave.  For those interested, information about Jackson Lee’s inveterate race-baiting, entitlement mentality, and volcanic temper, and more can check out her profile in the Freedom Center’s Discover the Networks website here.

Sadly I’m sure we haven’t yet heard the last from her, because the only people stupider than her are those who keep electing her and I’m sure they will once again send her back to Washington in resounding fashion.  And while I wish I could say that I look forward to that, for no other reason than the amusement she provides to so many of us, our country has now been put into a situation where only those serious about the nature of our predicament should be sent to fix it.



Over the course of the last year and so many months I thought I had heard, from the right and the left, every reason there was for NOT voting for Donald Trump.  But I was wrong.  And it’s only now, thanks to Tavis Smiley, that I can finally, and very safely so, declare that I have finally heard everything.  You see, it was in the form of a recent op-ed he put together for TIME magazine, that Mr. Smiley does little more than rant like a complete imbecile about his fears that blacks in America might one day return to slavery if Donald Trump wins the election.  This moron goes on to explain how he was asked by a student during a visit to Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, “Do you believe that given the crisis of our democracy, we black folk could ever find ourselves enslaved again?”  The short answer, according to this genius was, “Yes.”

So it was in his little piece entitled, “Why I Fear America Could Enslave Black People Again,” and yes, the entire thing is as stupid as the headline would seem to indicate, that Smiley writes:

“When I hear Donald Trump suggest that he wants to “make America great again,” it always triggers the same three questions in my head. 

One: How is Trump defining “greatness?” Two: Since so many fellow citizens have yet to experience the true “greatness” of America for the first time, for whom are we making America great again? And, three: To what specific period of American greatness are you wanting us to “return?”

Smiley remarked that he didn’t see that question coming, nor did “the mostly white audience.” But as it turns out, it would at least seem that he was certainly prepared with an answer.  Smiley goes on to write:

“In my lifetime, I have never seen Congress so blatantly mock our Constitution. It’s especially striking that it comes from the political party that’s always lecturing us about the “rule of law”. What’s worse is that they’re getting away with it. Republicans have turned this Constitutional issue into a political football and suckered the White House, Democrats in Congress and the news media into playing the game by their rules. This is a travesty of justice, but it has all but disappeared as a news story.”

And he concludes by writing:

“So, could the Constitution be thwarted and black folk end up enslaved again? Legal scholars, of course, will find the question ludicrous and laughable. 

It wasn’t farfetched for the young student who pressed me at Lehigh that evening. And, honestly? With the hair-raising, bone-chilling, spine-breaking, nerve-wracking path we’re on right now, I shudder to think where this democracy could end up one sad day, if we don’t get off this low road and make our way to higher ground soon.”

By making such a blatantly idiotic assumption, Smiley accomplishes little more than to expose to all who chose to read his pathetic little diatribe, his complete and utter ignorance regarding all things related to our Constitution and how our government to supposed to run.  I found myself asking, is TIME really this hard-up for readership?  Do they REALLY have to bring in some hack to write the dumbest, most idiotic piece of drivel all in the hopes of convincing people to see for themselves what an over-the-top ridiculous left-wing circus this once-great news source has now been reduced to?  Because that’s the only reason I would have bothered to click on this stupid thing, that and the fact that it provided me with both material and opportunity to mock this loser Smiley by pointing out what a pathetic fraud and blatant hypocrite he really is.

Smiley’s nonsensical premise as presented in his silly little op-ed is based almost entirely on the rather bizarre liberal lie that Donald Trump’s slogan “Make America Great Again” somehow means that he wants to take America back to a time when black people were slaves, women couldn’t vote, and gay people were locked in the closet.  It’s typical Democrat scare tactics, just taken up a notch.  ‘Slick Willy’ has used the same slogan.  It has been for some time now that Smiley has experienced anywhere near the kind of destitution the slaves in America were accustomed to. Having long ago earned his way into the $10 million dollar club, Smiley leads a pretty great life, which in itself would seem to prove that his theory is unfounded, at least for a proud one-percenter like himself.

The crisis in our democracy is one driven by the rise of the socialist left which advocates for whatever it can claim as “promot(ing) the common good” as an excuse to nullify individual rights.  It is a centralized, authoritarian government to which Progressives are leading us that is a danger to personal liberty.  If enslaving people is “good for society”, then the individual freedom of some will have to be sacrificed “for the greater good”.  You don’t matter to government; that’s why we have a Constitution that is supposed to guarantee an individual’s rights regardless of the will of the majority and whomever they may choose to elect. The crisis is not “of our democracy”, but rather of our individual rights.  And, seriously folks, does anyone know anyone who even knows of anyone who wants black people to be slaves?

And what appears completely lost on this boob, Smiley, either on purpose or maybe he really is that stupid, is the fact that the Democrat Party, yes the very same party to which old Tavis has apparently sold his soul, is the party of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation.  So I’m not able to make the connection here, as Smiley is apparently able to, between Donald Trump being elected president and the sudden reemergence of slavery here in America, at least of the variety which resulted in the Civil War.  However, the type of slavery which Smiley seems to be quite comfortable with is the institutional type, the specific purpose of which is to enslave large amounts of Americans, primarily minorities, to the government.  And were it not for individuals like Smiley the Democrat Party would never be able to succeed in doing so.

Sadly, the truth is that Blacks like this stooge, Smiley, are nothing more than control agents and gate keepers for the white liberal establishment. They long ago paid off this backstabber in exchange for his loyalty by keeping the low information blacks on the Democrat plantation much like the black gatekeepers the slave owners of the past had during the slavery era, to make sure the slaves did not escape.  And in exchange for their loyalty, there was a promise of a life of leisure.  What this idiot Smiley and all the other so-called black ‘leaders’ do not realize is that they are all being used in the same exact way. And yet they continue to pledge their undying loyalty to the Democrat Party and criminals like Hitlery. These people are all brainwashed puppets. Man, talk about stupid and ignorant. Welcome to the new white plantation.



Sheila Jackson Lee, otherwise known as she who is perhaps the dumbest bitch on the entire planet, recently declared that American’s should not be permitted own automatic weapons.   Now when it comes to just how ignorant the esteemed Ms. Jackson Lee is, you certainly don’t need to take my word for it.  You really need to do nothing more than to simply wait for her to open her big mouth.  For example, it was during a speech this past Wednesday on the floor of the U.S. House that this genius said that we must also close gun loopholes and expand background checks and then tried to link automatic weapons to gun related crimes.  No keep in mind here this is the very same individual who thought America planted a flag on Mars.

As was recently reported in the ‘Free Beacon’, Jackson Lee attempted to use the fear-based “automatic weapons” phrase to make her point about reducing the Second Amendment rights of law abiding Americans.  Jackson Lee began in her little 5-minute diatribe by saying, “Simple legislation that could be passed. I think it is crucial in America that we do so, because the violence has many roots–housing, health care, poverty, but certainly it has the tool, and that is guns.”  And then she went on to say, “That is automatic weapons like AK-47s and others more sophisticated. America has a right to the Second Amendment, but the people of America have a right to safety and the prevention of gun violence in their community.”

It was pointed out by the Free Beacon, “that people frequently misuse the phrase “automatic weapons” when they are actually referring to “semi-automatic weapons.” Many handguns and sporting rifles are semi-automatic. The AK-47 is manufactured in both automatic and semi-automatic models. In a semi-automatic weapon you must pull the trigger each time you want to fire. An automatic weapon will fire as long as you hold the trigger, until you run out of ammunition. Rarely are fully automatic weapons used in crimes. In fact, their ownership is already highly restricted and registered nationally.”  And as we all know those who are most often prone to misuse the nomenclature of “automatic weapons” are Democrats.

In offering a critique of Jackson Lee’s comments, Charlie Hoffmann of the Free Beacon wrote: “Automatic weapons are not commonly used in gun crimes in America, however. Since 1986, the sale of newly manufactured automatic weapons to civilians have been banned. If an individual wants to purchase an automatic weapon, they have to go through a strict vetting process while also registering that weapon with the federal government. As a result, automatic weapons are also very expensive to personally own.”  Jackson Lee’s attempts to associate automatic weapons with gun violence are disingenuous, at best, and likely would have a difficult time passing even the most cavalier of fact-checks.  But that doesn’t prevent her from making them.

I would suggest that perhaps Ms. Jackson Lee spend just a bit more of her very valuable time trying to familiarize herself with the 1968 Gun Control Act which actually defines a semi-automatic weapon as being “any repeating rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.”  The key part there is the “separate pull of the trigger”, or in language simple enough that even Jackson Lee should be able to understand it, one pull equals one shot.  The law speaks clearly about what it means by the term semi-automatic. When it comes to the term “automatic,” a little inference is required.

And then there’s the 1934 National Firearms Act which defines a machine gun as being “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.”  Note that part about more than one shot fired by “a single function of the trigger.”  Or in simpler language, again for the benefit of Jackson Lee, one pull equals many shots.  That’s the legal difference between a semi-automatic and a fully automatic weapon, a concept that Jackson Lee either fails to understand or one she very purposely misstates for purely political purposes.  Which is usually the case with Democrats.  When the fact don’t support their plans, they simply ignore them.

Jackson Lee is so dumb that she actually makes Nancy Pelosi appear smart.  A Democrat who represents Texas’ 18th congressional district, Jackson Lee once suggested during an address to her congressional colleagues that the Constitution and the American system of governance has lasted about 400 years.  She said at the time, “Maybe I should offer a good thanks to the distinguished members of the majority, the Republicans, my chairman and others, for giving us an opportunity to have a deliberative constitutional discussion that reinforces the sanctity of this nation and how well it is that we have lasted some 400 years, operating under a Constitution that clearly defines what is constitutional and what is not.”

Now ordinarily I wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about anything that Jackson Lee has to say on any subject?  But I’m always concerned about the Democrats continuous quest for never ending control and power that has created the problem of gun violence in America. They want voters who only support Democrats and who willingly allow them to fundamentally change our country to serve their purpose.  Instead of doing the right thing, the Democrats want only to take away the Second Amendment to our Constitution.  Think about it, if the Democrats really gave a damn, and really cared about gun violence and gun crimes they would join with Republicans in demanding that the thousands of gun laws already on the books be enforced.

And what’s really disgraceful is the fact that our liberal state-controlled media goes out of its way to perpetuate the Democrat propaganda by repeating ad nauseam the data concocted by Democrats but that has absolutely no basis in any actual fact. They go out of their way to paint the most dire picture imaginable, while ignoring completely how things got to be so bad.  Take for instance the city of Chicago, the city that has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation, and yet has the nation’s highest murder rate.  This November the American people must overwhelmingly vote all these damn Democrats out of office.  They are determined to take away our Second Amendment, but even more importantly they are not serving the people!



It was just this past Tuesday, on MSNBC, that those watching were made to watch as one tired old cow worked hard to defend yet another tired old cow.  It was while discussing the recent presidential debate that Hitlery supporter, Sen. Babs Boxer, a Democrat, made the rather idiotic claim that because Donald Trump interrupted Hitlery his actions were “absolutely” a “disrespect of women.”  So, apparently, if I’m understanding old Babs correctly, Mr. Trump was to do nothing more than to stand quietly behind his podium and speak only when spoken to, while Hitlery and Lester went about having a nice conversation just between themselves.  If Trump hadn’t taken the opportunities that he did to insert himself into the debate, he likely would have ended up being little more than a target.

Now we all know that when it comes to these wackos/bimbos who populate the left in this country, if there could somehow be a world completely devoid of all men they likely wouldn’t be bothered by that in the least.   Anyway, old Babs made her appearance on something called, ‘Live with Tamron Hall’.  And just to let you know how things went down, here’s just part of the idiotic little exchange that took place between these two mentally challenged individuals:  First it was Ms. Hall who asked, “I got to quickly ask you this—about the number of times he interrupted her. Vox.com said Hillary Clinton was interrupted 25 times in 26 minutes. By the time it was over, Trump had interrupted her 51 times, where she interrupted him just 17 times. Does that read to you as a disrespect?”

To which old Babs responded by saying, “Absolutely. It’s a disrespect of women. I could tell you, I remember very well the first time I took office in a local office, I couldn’t get three words out, Tamron, before my male colleagues jumped down my throat. It’s something that they do. I don’t even think they realize it. But I think Donald Trump did realize it. He tried to take her off her game, and guess what?  She was so presidential. She didn’t let it get to her. She finished her thought. and, you know, I thought his interruptions were rude and wrong, really. Once in a while, sure but not 51 times.”  So dare I ask, just how any times might one be permitted to interrupt a women before one is considered to be disrespectful?  Is it 5 times, 10 times or perhaps 20 times?  How many is too many?

I guess I would also ask Babs if Hitlery’s hateful, rather deceitful defense of her sexual predator husband is considered reprehensible.  If you want “disrespectful” and “deplorable”, how about the little tidbit that came from one of Hitlery’s many “hit men” assigned to assassinate the credibility and reputation of the INNOCENT WOMEN Hitlery’s rapist husband assaulted.  That would be: “Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park and see what you get.”  I’m sure that that’s what Babs saw, that’s her prism.  And I’m sure African-Americans saw Trump’s challenge to Holt’s antics to be racist, and Muslims saw his defense of our National Security as Islamophobic.  And I’m sure most unhyphenated Americans saw only what they wanted to see and heard only what they wanted to hear.  It’s par for the course.

All I’ve got to say to these two imbeciles, is, “Quick ladies, run to your safe zones!”  And let’s be real, shall we.  If Trump hadn’t interrupted her he would have likely had much less opportunity to make any of his points.  Which, I suppose, some might have seen as being a good thing.  Because it seems that old Lester allowed Hitlery blather on and on well past her allotted time, on multiple occasions, while at the same time keeping Trump to the rules.  Which may help explain Trump’s eagerness to get his points out.  I haven’t seen the tally yet but I suspect she still managed to talk more than Trump by a significant amount.  And as we know, Holt was happy to spend too much time on Trump’s tax returns while staying very far away from Hitlery’s continuing email saga, and her Clinton Foundation woes.

So anyway old Babs seems to be under the impression that when a man interrupts a woman DURING A DEBATE, that that somehow shows disrespect?  If that’s the case then I guess I would I would question her understanding of what a debate actually is.  At least one that takes place here in America??  Now I’m quite sure she’s of the opinion that most men should be seen and not heard.  Unless, of course, they’re some sort of leftist wingnut Democrat for whom such a rule does not apply.   Maybe old Babs should ask Trump’s previous debate opponents about this.  Because I think it’s fair to say that he was pretty much of an equal opportunity interrupter of both men and women. But that matter little to this leftist loon, as she will obviously say anything no matter how absurd.

And ya know, I think we could argue that Trump didn’t interrupt a woman.  While the person he interrupted can be called a female, they can also be identified as being nothing more than a no-good-lying-sack-of-crap who did nothing but sit on their rather sizeable ass while an Ambassador and his security staff were being attacked, and murdered on the anniversary of this nation’s worst terrorist attack, 9/11/2012.  Four American lives were lost and all due to their inability, or unwillingness, to make a decision, as well as the need to keep from the American people potentially damaging information close to an election involving Barry “Almighty”.  This was the first time this country had had an Ambassador killed since those not so thrilling days of the Jimmy Carter.  Another scumbag Democrat!

These pseudo-intellectual, baby-boomer-bitches really piss me off.  The hippy generation, of which old Babs is a proud member, is the filthy scourge responsible for bringing this country to the brink of destruction, and very purposely I might add!  And every last one of these pathetic scumbags deserves to be barred from ever being able to serve in public office in any capacity!  And what I find so incredibly amusing is this constant playing of the woman card with respect to Hitlery.  Is she running for the highest office in the land or is she running to be the woman filling in for the leader of the Free world?  If the first option, then she stands as an equal with no favors or deference to her being a woman.  Which foreign leader is it that would ever provide her with that privilege?  None that I can think of.