TRUMP’S REAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY VERSUS OBAMA’S FICTIONAL ONE…

1001

If you have been paying any amount of attention to the antics of those in the Democrat Party, as well as their many minions in the ‘fake news’ state-controlled media complex, you would have to come to the conclusion that, for the most part, they have now become completely unhinged.  And it would seem that with each passing day they become a bit more so.  It’s really quite the bizarre phenomenon, even for Democrats.  So how is it that we are to take them seriously?

It was for eight long years, and nearly on a daily basis, that we heard from Barry about what a terrible economy it was that he had inherited from George Bush.  And for those same eight years the socialist policies put in place by Barry did little more than to make our economic problems worse.  We were constantly being reminded about how some great economic recovery was underway and yet during Barry’s entire eight year reign economic growth only once got to a 2 percent annual growth rate.

And it was also during those eight long years that we had more folks out of the nation’s workforce than we did since the days of Jimmy Carter and wages actually decreased.  And we were told that what we were witnessing, economically speaking, was to be viewed as being the normal for our once vibrant economy.  That what we were seeing was going to be the best we’d ever get.  So in 2016 we had a choice to make, continue with the same failed policies, or to try something different.

And that something different has resulted in a true economic boom. Last month, for instance, the American economy added 201,000 jobs and the unemployment rate held steady at 3.9 percent.  Apparently, many of our so-called economists had forecast 191,100 new jobs and that the unemployment rate would be falling to 3.8 percent.  Now I’m not sure what it takes these days to be an economist, I can only hope that it’s at least a little more than what it takes to be called a ‘professor’.

Also last month, we saw average hourly earnings increase 2.9 percent for the month on an annualized basis, according to a Department of Labor report released Friday. That also beat expectations for 2.7 percent wage growth. In dollar terms, average hourly earnings increased 10 cents from the previous month to $27.16.  Private sector payrolls rose by 204,000. Mining added 6,000 new jobs. Construction added 23,000, bringing its total to over 300,000 for the year.

Now with all that being said, it was during a speech that Barry delivered earlier today at the University of Illinois which, oddly enough, gave him an award for “ethics in government” that Barry claimed it is he and not President Trump who deserves credit for the “economic miracle” Trump and Republicans are now touting. He said, “When you hear how great the economy’s doing right now, let’s just remember when this recovery started.”  Yes, the ‘real’ recovery started with President Trump!

As for Friday’s strong employment numbers Barry claimed, “Those job numbers are the same as they were in 2015 and 2016.”  Of course, the kernel of truth inside Barry’s claim is that the pace of job creation has been the same over the past several years.  But what he leaves out is that the economy is doing much better by several other measures as well, including the pace of growth, the rise in household income, and the increase in opportunities at the lower end of the spectrum.

Moreover, when Barry takes credit for the economic recovery, he ignores the fact that it was the slowest recovery in the post-war era, largely due to HIS policies. The recovery began in earnest when Republicans took over the House in 2010, and put an end to any prospect of more massive stimulus bills, or more heavy regulations like Obamacare.  Today, Barry blamed the Republicans’ victory in 2010 for the fact that he failed “to reverse 40-year trends” of inequality.  Actually, it just took Trump.

So in the big scheme of things I can’t help but wonder if there are today enough Americans, at least of those who vote, who would actually prefer a return to the days of Obama-style economic policies rather than to ensure that we stay the course on which the economic policies of President Trump have put us.  I suppose that’s something that we will come to find out in a mere 59 days.   There is much uncertainty surrounding the coming election, with choices that could not be clearer.

Barry ‘O’ once joked about the so-called “Magic Wand” in terms of being able to bring manufacturing jobs back to America.  And it’s that magic wand that appears to have taken the form of President Trump, a president who, at least as much as he can, enforces our immigration laws and thus puts upward pressure on real Americans’ wages.  Also, the tax cut and regulation cutting plays a role. Thank God for President Trump and the real “Magic Wand” along with cutting regulations and taxes.

Apparently a booming economy, at least when a Republican is in the White House, causes an extraordinary meltdown among Democrats.  And while Democrats, as a party, have nothing to offer other than hating our president, the country is in the best shape, economically speaking, than it has been in decades.  And because of that the ‘Democrat-Hate-America’ agenda has now been exposed and with it their hatred of America, of average Americans, of God and of American exceptionalism!!

All Barry succeeded in doing, with his self-promoting little speech, was to remind us all of how it was that he came to preside over what was the single largest collective wipeout of Democrat Party power in modern U.S. political history.  And he also reminded us of why we chose to vote for Donald Trump and not his chosen successor, Hitlery.  The speech was crafted out nothing more than lies, half-truths, lies by omission, distortions and straw men arguments. It never changes with this guy.

Those on the receiving of our current economic boom know full well that it is President Trump who’s responsible for what is a bona fide economic recovery, not something that was essentially nothing more than a ‘recovery’ in name only, which is what we experienced during Barry’s tenure in the White House.  Barry left America no better than it was when he found it, and he offers us only excuses for why.  And it has been in a brief 18 months that President Trump has already made it better.

TRUMP ON A MISSION TO MAKE IT APPEAR AS IF OBAMA WAS NEVER PRESIDENT…

948

Hopefully, and with any luck, right about the time that President Trump is finishing up his eighth year in office it will be as if Barry ‘O’ had never been president.  And I think that’s the one thing that terrifies Democrats most of all about President Trump, and why there has been such a concerted effort by those on the left to do all that they can in their attempt to remove him from office.  But as has been mentioned more than a few times, of late, it’s in spite of ‘news’ coverage that has been over 90 percent negative practically since he took office that his approval rating continues to tick upward and is now higher than Barry’s was at the same point in his first term.

And might I say that never has there been a president who was more deserving of having his ‘legacy’ erased, and to make it appear as if his presidency never even happened, than Barry ‘O’.  The ONLY positive thing that resulted from his having been in office is that we ended up with President Trump.  Because, as I have said on any number of previous occasions, had Barry not been elected president I am very firmly convinced there would have never been a President Trump.  Barry set out to “fundamentally change America.”  And now Trump is fundamentally changing Barry’s legacy.  Barry is now being fundamentally erased, as if he was never elected.

And the decision by President Trump to withdraw from the nuclear deal with Iran is the biggest blow, but it’s only the latest. The elimination of the individual mandate and canceling the yearly bailout of insurance companies has left Obamacare in a precarious condition.  Young immigrants whose parents brought them to the United States unlawfully, the so-called dreamers, are losing their legal status.  This is historic. Presidents often vow to wipe out big chunks of their predecessor’s legacies.  President Eisenhower was going to take on the ‘New Deal’, Ronald Reagan targeted ‘The Great Society.’  Both backed down.  President Trump, so far, has not.

But Barry and Democrats made President Trump’s task a relatively easy one.  Barry, as you’ll recall, succeeded brilliantly in the first two years of his presidency when Democrats controlled Congress.  But once Republicans held the House, Senate, or both over the next six years, he ignored Capitol Hill whenever he thought he could get away with it.  He spared himself the unpleasantness of having to compromise with Republicans and instead governed by executive orders and regulations.  And as he is now finding out, actions taken by the president alone prove vulnerable to being erased by subsequent presidents. And that’s what happened to the pact with Iran.

Democrats went so far as to use the filibuster to block even a nonbinding vote on it. President Trump killed the deal with his pen. That was also all it took to quit the Paris accord on global warming.  There were two factors behind Barry’s decision to shun a treaty, which requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Winning that lopsided a vote appeared to be impossible. On the other hand, Barry had a backup, Hitlery. She was expected to win the presidency in 2016 and could then be relied upon to protect the nuclear agreement.  But a funny thing happened on the way to the inauguration, Hitlery lost the election.  And Barry’s legacy is now going up in smoke.

On immigration, Barry might well have prevailed had he sought congressional approval of legal status for young illegals, the dreamers. Again, Republican votes would have been needed.  He rejected that. And since Barry said he couldn’t legally act on his own, it looked like nothing would be done.  Then he changed his mind and simply announced the approach known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Neither a regulation nor a law, it’s simply a policy. With Barry gone, it lacks a presidential defender.  Trump abandoned it, though he’s offered a pact to keep the dreamers here: They’d be legalized and Trump would get his wall on the southwest border.

Which would seem to be a pretty straightforward exchange, except for one thing. Democrats remain stubbornly opposed to the wall.  It’s more important to them than even the fate of hundreds of thousands of dreamers, so Democrats declined.  Which leads to another problem they’ve created for themselves, one that further jeopardizes Barry’s legacy while making political life less of a struggle for President Trump and Republicans.  Democrats have adopted a strategy of resisting President Trump across the board.  It’s blind resistance, all anger and ideology with absolutely no amount of commonsense thrown in.  And there haven’t been any exceptions.

As much as Barry and Democrats are to blame, Barry’s incredible shrinking legacy isn’t entirely their fault. A good bit is the result of Trump’s success and canny choice of issues. On foreign policy, does anyone want to return to the days of appeasing North Korea? Should the American embassy in Israel be moved back to Tel Aviv at the earliest opportunity?  Should we go back to insisting that concessions by Israel provide a path to peace in the Middle East?  On domestic issues, Barry’s legacy has better prospects for survival, or at least for being revived by some future Democrat majority in Congress.  That’s because the Democrat mindset on taxes is locked in place.

Finally, Barry ‘O’ set out to fundamentally degrade America, internally and externally, and he was largely successful because our cadre of RINOs in Congress simply rolled over and essentially funded him 100 percent for eight years.  And what about the social fabric of our nation?  Look where the promotion of homosexual marriage/ adoption and transgender “rights” has lead us.  Look at the black racism in the BLM movement and in racial alliance with violent black thugs that Barry openly promoted.  President Trump needs to continue the dismantling of Barry’s legacy and to root out the pernicious residue left behind by this anti-America traitor!

JANUARY 20, 2017, THE END OF AN ERROR…

trump-26

I doubt that even if he had tried Barry could not have come up with a more fitting end to what has been, without a doubt, the single most disastrous presidency in the history of our country.  And of course what I’m speaking about is how as his last major act as president, Barry “Almighty” somehow saw fit to cut short the sentences of over 300 convicted drug dealers.  But you know, I can’t think of a better way to sum up the last 8 years of having this racist thug in the White House.  The move brings Barry’s bid to correct what he’s repeatedly called a systematic injustice, to a climactic close.  But on the bright side, at least we’re finally rid of him.

His final batch of commutations is the most any U.S. president has ever issued in a single day.  And it’s the culmination of a second-term effort to remedy consequences of decades of onerous sentencing requirements that according to Barry, put tens of thousands of drug offenders behind bars for too long.  Barry’s justification for doing so is his claim that he has repeatedly called on Congress to act, but lawmakers refused.  And it’s the crimes that will most assuredly be committed by those recently released that will, going forward, come to be Barry’s true legacy, and sadly it will be the one part of his legacy that President Trump will be unable to turn back.

With this his final offer of clemency, Barry brought his total number of commutations granted to 1,715, which is more than any other president in U.S. history.  During his presidency Barry “Almighty” ordered free 568 inmates who had been sentenced to life in prison.  And it was Neil Eggleston, Barry’s White House counsel, who said, “He wanted to do it. He wanted the opportunity to look at as many as he could to provide relief.”  And he added, “He saw the injustice of the sentences that were imposed in many situations, and he has a strong view that people deserve a second chance.”   No, this was all about bowing to his leftist supporters and not much else.

For Barry, it was the last time that he would have the opportunity to use his presidential powers to stick his finger in the eye of those who love this country, and who believe in law and order.  Because at noon today, President-elect Donald Trump was sworn in as President, finally bringing Barry’s dark and sinister chapter in American history to an end.  And as has typically been the case with Barry, and more times than I care to count, he chose to act unilaterally, and as he saw fit.  And I have no doubt that his bizarre penchant for releasing convicted criminals back onto our streets will likely come to leave an indelible mark upon our country.

And apparently we’re supposed to believe that Barry actually took the time to personally review the case of each and every inmate who received a commutation, often, or so we are told, poring over case files in the evenings or calling his attorneys into his office to discuss specifics.  Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates said the administration reviewed all applications that came in by an end-of-August deadline – more than 16,000 in total.  Sorry, but I’m feeling the need to throw the bullshit flag on that one.  I mean seriously?  How stupid does one need to be to actually believe that Barry took the time to sit down and pour over all those records?

Barry has long called for phasing out strict sentences for drug offenses, arguing that they lead to excessive punishment and incarceration rates unseen in other developed countries.  And it has been with Barry’s enthusiastic support that the Justice Department, in recent years, has directed prosecutors to rein in the use of harsh mandatory minimums.  Earlier in the week, Barry also commuted most of the rest of convicted leaker Bradley Manning’s sentence, arguing the Army intelligence analyst had shown remorse and already served a long sentence.  What remorse?  There was a reason that Manning was sentenced to 35 years.  But Barry saw it differently.

Let’s be honest here, in reality these final commutations was nothing more than Barry taking one last opportunity to gives the middle finger to law-abiding Americans, and law enforcement officers like nothing else could!  He seems to have an unbridled fondness towards drug pushers!  And especially if they happen to be black!!  I’d love to see the racial makeup of those whom Barry has seen fit to release, and I’d like to know how many are Moslem converts.  After all, he seems to be doing all that he can to make sure America becomes even more infested with terrorists!  I’d like to know who’s tracking these slugs as many will likely return to their criminal behavior!

Who in their right mind is able to look at anything Barry did over the course of the last eight years, and honestly say that he anything that he did was done because he loves this country?  From day one of his being in the Oval Office Barry went out of his way to do everything he possibly could to weaken and to diminish this country on every level.  And it was on each and every day of his presidency that he would prove just how much he despises America.  Oh sure, he may have claimed to love America, but, as they say, actions speak louder than words.  And Barry’s actions spoke volumes about the level of hatred he has for America.  But today is a new day!

SO, WHAT ROLE DID RUSSIA REALLY PLAY IN HITLERY’S DEFEAT, IF ANY???

714

I must say that up until quite recently I’ve never been much of a believer in conspiracy theories, whether they involved space aliens or corrupt politicians. But all this talk about Russian involvement, or alleged involvement, in the hacking of the DNC and how it affected the outcome of our recent election, really got me to thinking.  I began to wonder if perhaps there was some truth to the claims that hacking, allegedly committed by the Russians, might have had an impact on the election to the point where that involvement actually caused Hitlery to lose.

Many conservatives and Trump supporters have long been adamantly dismissive of the possibility that interference by Russian hackers, alleged or otherwise, actually changed the outcome of the 2016 election.  But they would do well to rethink things.  Because even a cursory glance back over the events of the past few years would reveal how the near constant meddling by the Russians absolutely played a role in denying Hitlery her rightful position as the first female president of these United States of America.  And such evidence should not simply be dismissed out of hand.

There are, upon closer inspection, a rather significant number of interesting examples that would seem to indicate just how it was that the Russians were able to manipulate events and to therefore successfully prevent Hitlery from winning the election.  Now I know there will be many who, no matter what proof I may offer, will chose to deny any and all involvement by the Russians.  So it’s for those deniers that I present the following rundown of events that point out how Hitlery’s seemingly invincible presidential campaign was brought down thanks Russian hacking efforts:

March 1996: Russian Spetsnaz Special Forces pepper Hitlery with sniper rifle fire as she lands in Sarajevo after the Bosnian War.  Shortly after, Russian hackers destroy all video footage of this event, replacing it with fake news accounts that Hitlery’s visit was peaceful.  Hitlery’s unbelievable bravery in Bosnia is subsequently disbelieved.

January 28, 2009: Russia-financed black hat hackers in Donetsk, Ukraine, hack Hitlery’s personal Blackberry and modify the emails she sends. An email demanding that Hitlery follow all Department of State email rules is quietly deleted, and replaced with a spoof email demanding the creation of a private email server stored at her personal home in New York.

May 2013: A Russian hack of Hitlery’s teleprompter modifies her speech to Banco Itau, altering her speech to say that her dream is “open borders” with the entire Western Hemisphere, instead of her original dream of “safe, well-regulated borders.”

February 2015: Chinese hackers in the employ of Moscow penetrate the Clinton Foundation and alter its payroll to pay men far more than women, causing the Clinton campaign embarrassment when this big imbalance is brought up, undermining their efforts to run a campaign on closing the pay gap.

May 2015: Rudolph Epstein, a minor Hitlery staffer co-opted by a Russian hacker’s girlfriend, convinces Hitlery’s campaign manager Robby Mook to outsource the campaign’s decision-making to a computer program named Ada. The program, though, is simply the work of hackers from Novosibirsk, who use it as a vehicle to sabotage Hitlery’s campaign while promoting various fake news storylines. The program steadily supplies Hitlery with terrible ideas, such as printing off literal “woman cards” and joking about wiping her email server “with a cloth.”

Dec. 22, 2015: A group of Moscow hackers gain access to Hitlery’s campaign website, posting an embarrassing fake news article about how “Hillary Clinton is just like your abuela.” This fake news damages Hitlery’s campaign by causing an unjustified backlash from the public who regard it as ethnic pandering by Hitlery.

March 13, 2016: A Russian spy in Hitlery’s campaign swaps out her primary debate notes with doctored copies produced by Russian intelligence. The doctored notes include a line saying Hitlery wants to put coal miners out of work, which Clinton mistakenly reads, alienating working class whites across the country.

March 15, 2016: The same Russian spy implants electrodes on an unsuspecting Hitlery’s neck as she takes a nap, causing her to later bark like a dog during a rally in Reno, Nevada.

April 10, 2016: Russian agents in New York City advance $4 million into Bill de Blasio’s bank account, bribing him to make a joke about being on “C.P time” (colored people time) in his delayed endorsement of Hitlery for president. The nefarious ploy costs Hitlery thousands of black voters in swing states.

Sept. 7, 2016: Revolutionary Russian technology allows hackers to “hack” Clinton’s memories, causing her to forget entirely about the Benghazi attack and claim no Americans have died in Libya.

Sept. 11, 2016: Biologists tied to the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, use satellites to broadcast damaging rays directly into Clinton’s brain stem, causing her to abruptly collapse at a Sept. 11 memorial service after just 90 minutes outside in mild weather.

Oct. 18, 2016: Armenian hackers tied to Moscow burrow into Hitlery’s campaign bank account, diverting $1 million meant for voter turnout operations in Michigan to the non-competitive states of Indiana and Missouri. For good measure, the hackers also cancel a $2 million ad buy in Pennsylvania and Florida, buying replacement ads in Arizona instead.

Nov. 2, 2016: A hacker collective in Smolensk diverts Hitlery’s campaign plane away from General Mitchell International Airport in Milwaukee, forcing her to instead land in Tempe, Arizona, and campaign there. Thanks to this interference, Hitlery doesn’t have a single campaign stop in Wisconsin and narrowly loses the state to Donald Trump.

So there you have it.  And as much as I hate to admit it, it seems pretty obvious that old Vlad Putin made it possible for Donald Trump to win the election and become the 45th president of the United States.  Anyone require anymore proof?  Frankly, it all looks pretty cut and dried to me!  Let’s face it, it’s hard to deny that them crafty old Russians just might have played a bigger role in Trump’s victory than even I thought.  And if that doesn’t make you want to side with all those demanding recounts or for the Electoral College to elect Hitlery, then I don’t suppose anything will.

BIG MISTAKE FOR TRUMP TO ENDORSE PAUL RYAN…

Trump and Ryan

Personally, I wasn’t one of those who was overly concerned about whether or not Trump would choose to endorse Paul Ryan.  And now that he has I’m fairly confident that there will come a day, should Trump win, when he will regret having done so.  I was a little confused by claims that Trump’s failure to do so somehow represented a split in the party.  I had to laugh whenever I heard Trump being criticized, by a mix of Democrats and the NeverTrump crowd, for not endorsing someone who was actually referred to as a “mainstream Republican.”  And I was hoping Trump would end up endorsing is Ryan’s primary opponent, Mr. Paul Nehlen.

Let’s face it, Ryan is nothing if not the “poster boy” for the Chamber of Commerce and as such he very enthusiastically supports the Chambers’ continuing desire for cheap foreign labor regardless of how it might come to impact even his own constituents.  Since practically Ryan first set foot into Congress he has never, ever, been supportive of any of the many attempts that have been made to secure our southern border, or to do anything substantial about the issue of illegal immigration into the country.  While he’s provided plenty of lip service, he has never done anything that would have resulted in a more secure border! NEVER!

Trump’s endorsement notwithstanding, Ryan needs to display a little honesty and stand up in front of his constituents and say: ‘Look, I’m an open borders guy. The Chamber [of Commerce] believes in it, the Chamber wants cheap labor, [and] I respond to what the Chamber wants. I always have. I’m an establishment guy.’ He needs to tell his constituents who he is. I think that’s the really responsible and respectable thing to do. [Tell voters] ‘I’m for TPP even though, yeah, most of my constituents are going to get hurt by it, but the Chamber wants that.’ He should stand do that because it’s the truth, and he has a responsibility to tell people the truth.

When I hear ‘RINO Ryan’ say things like how he’s so dedicated about doing something about our border, and about how he’s meeting with people to see how we can strengthen the border, I know that it’s all nothing but pure political bullshit!  So what I wish to do here is to throw the B.S. flag.  You know, there’s a reason that people are so cynical about Congress, and about politicians.  And this is one of the reasons why.  Because how can you have a guy, who has dedicated his entire political life essentially to one set of policies, ideas and principles, and then yet come home and tell his constituents something that which is the complete opposite.

There are essentially two problems in trying to deal with the immigration issue. The first problem is, of course, the Democrat Party which views massive immigration, both legal and illegal, as being nothing more than a source of voter pool replenishment. The second problem, and just as powerful an enemy by the way, is the Republican Party which views massive immigration, both legal and illegal, as a source of cheap labor. And that philosophy was represented by the Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  And by working to achieve their goal the Republicans are doing nothing more than to reduce the life expectancy of their party, my party.

While we may have had, at one time, a viable and robust two party system, it’s been over time that the two parties have moved much closer together, regarding their political philosophy, much to detriment of the country and of the American people, who have been forced to pay a price in both the amount of their hard earned money they are forced to turn over the government and in the amount of freedom that they have lost because of individuals like Ryan.  Conservatives, if they wish to return the Republican Party to what it once was, must position themselves to seize control of it in the same way that the American left has seized control of the Democrat Party.

But I have to be honest, we are rapidly running out of time, as well as the number of chances, we have left to do what so desperately needs to be done.  And if we are to have any hope of being successful in that endeavor, despite Trump’s endorsement of Ryan, we, as voters, must still work as hard as we can to get rid of Ryan and all of those like him in this election.  The truth is, we have within our party today individuals who are really nothing more than a cancer, a cancer that is slowly, but surely, killing our party.  After the 2010, 2012 and 2014 elections we chose to support the Republicans only to find out after the election that we had been lied to.

And if Trump intends to be of any help in that process then he is going to have to remain focused on that which is the big picture.  And I think had Trump endorsed Ryan’s opponent it would have increased the odds of Ryan’s defeat, which I think would be a good thing.  And by doing so I think he would have accomplished two things, demonstrated his seriousness about immigration reform and that he does intend to push the building of wall through Congress, and he would have put the fear of God into those, like Ryan, who might then start to rethink the Ryan philosophy of putting Americans second, whereas Trump’s desire is to put Americans first.

Now I’m not here to try to convince anyone that Trump has been some life-long conservative, I’m not that naïve.  But like it or not at least this time around he is the ONLY option that we have if we are going to succeed in our mission of returning the Republican Party to being that which would truly be a conservative alternative to a Democrat Party that has now moved so far to the left as to make it nearly indiscernible from the Communist Party.  To the degree that Chuckie Schumer, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, and even Hitlery, can’t tell the difference.  So we on the right have just 94 days to come together, and begin turning back to the right.

JUDGE CURIEL NOT EXACTLY WHAT THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE???

567

You know, it seems to me that the more ‘they’ keep throwing stuff at Trump in the hopes that ‘they’ can get something to stick, the more things seem to bounce off the man.  Which proves that whatever Trump has said has been somewhat correct all along.  And so it is, yet again, regarding the comments he has made regarding Judge Gonzalo Curiel.  But let’s be perfectly frank here, what is it, exactly, that Trump could ever do or say that could rival in any way that which Hitlery has done by divulging state secrets, or by exposing the names of covert operatives to what has become, thanks to Barry, Hitlery and John Kerry-Heinz, our growing list of enemies?

While those involved in our state-controlled media, along with that group of GOP establishment types who proudly identify themselves as “#NeverTrump”, are busy dismissing claims made by Trump that the judge presiding over his current civil case on Trump University, Judge Gonzalo Curiel, is biased against him, it would seem that that is becoming more and more a very real possibility. Trump has been slammed as being a “racist” for claiming that Curiel’s Mexican heritage predisposes him to oppose Trump’s immigration policies, but it’s more than simple Mexican heritage that could be cause for alarm.  Curiel, it seems, has made some very questionable associations.

As has already been pointed out by a number of sources, ‘Judge’ Curiel is a card carrying member of the California La Raza Lawyer’s Association.  And it is this group’s San Diego chapter, to which Curiel belongs, that lists the pro-illegal group the National Council of La Raza, as a community member.  And it has also now been revealed that one of the founders of the La Raza Lawyer’s Association called for California to be turned into a “Hispanic State” and that whites should “go back to Europe.”  What follows here are portions of a 2010 Snopes report on La Raza Lawyer’s Association’s founder, Mario Obledo:

The lawyers’ association to which Judge Gonzalo Curiel belongs was co-founded by a man who publicly bragged about Hispanics taking over California and all of the state’s governmental institutions–and insisted that whites should go back to Europe.

The Snopes report from 2010 states:  Mario Obledo was a co-founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) and the La Raza Lawyers of California bar association, and he formerly served as California’s Secretary of Health and Welfare. We don’t know exactly when and where he first made his controversial statement about California’s becoming a “Hispanic state,” but he has confirmed he said it at least twice: during an appearance on Ray Briem’s talk radio show in May or June of 1998, and again on Tom Leykis’ talk radio show:

Obledo: “We’re going to take over all the political institutions of California. In five years the Hispanics are going to be the majority population of this state.”

Caller: “You also made the statement that California is going to become a Hispanic state, and if anyone doesn’t like it, they should leave. Did you say that?”

Obledo: “I did. They ought to go back to Europe.”

The statements were also reported by the New York Times in their 2010 obituary for Obledo.

And it should be noted that MALDEF is also listed as a community affiliate of the San Diego La Raza Lawyer’s website.  Judge Curiel’s connection to the National Council of La Raza and to Obledo could be tangential, or it could be more substantive, but either way I think we can expect there to be very little chance that any of the industrious journalists who are members of our state-controlled media will be wanting to waste any of their valuable time investigating the matter, especially if it were to prove that Trump’s concerns might actually have merit.  After all, they didn’t bother to investigate Barry’s many questionable associations back in 2008 or in 2012.

So look, to the untrained eye it would at least appear that Trump’s claims, however badly articulated they may have been, may have been substantively correct. However, it will never be corrected by the state-controlled media that Trump was right about this judge having connections to anti-white/pro-Hispanic groups.  Because, you see, this is what it means to be a “civil rights” advocator today.  White people need to go back where you belong so we can make this state all for the race we like. This guy says this with no repercussions at all.  And if you protest you are attacked as being a bigot. Remind me again how privileged I am to be a white male?

And again as a bit of a reminder, it was back in June off 1998 that this guy, Obledo, pretty clearly articulated his racialist agenda by stating, “We’re going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave. If they [whites] don’t like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe.” And it was around that same time period that he told the Los Angeles Times: “It’s inevitable that Hispanics or Mexican Americans are going to control the institutions of the state of California in the not-too-distant future. If people don’t like that, they can leave.”

So as usually the case whenever you shine the light of truth on liberals what you tend to find, right up to the highest office in the land, are people who hate America, hate Christians and hate white people.  Which is why, in all likelihood, that Barry appointed this guy to the bench in the first place.  There’s zero interest in preserving and/or abiding by our Constitution, it’s all about moving the progressive agenda forward.  This judge is nothing more than a political hack wearing a black robe and Trump has done nothing more than to shine that light of truth upon him.  And there’s nothing racist here, despite the many efforts to claim that such is the case.

I would like to remind folks of how, just last year, immigration Judge A. Ashley Tabaddor sued the DOJ after it forced her to recuse herself from “all immigration cases involving Iranians.”  Barry’s DOJ first became “concerned with the appearance of impropriety” after Tabaddor, who is of Iranian descent, attended a 2012 White House meeting with other high-profile Iranian-Americans.  Before signing off on her attending the meeting, Tabaddor’s DOJ superiors recommended she recuse herself from any future cases involving Iranian nationals, yet when she returned to Los Angeles ‘after’ the summit, that recommendation “became an official order.”