DNC SAYS ‘NO’ TO MONEY FROM ‘FOSSIL FUEL’ PRODUCERS…

Sen. Bernie Sanders And DNC Chair Tom Perez Hold Rally In Miami

Now suppose, just for the sake of argument, that you are the head of an organization whose sole source of revenue, or so we are constantly being told, comes from ‘donations’ from individuals as well as from certain groups and corporations.  And it’s a well-known fact that the organization which you head up is broke.  Would you then, as the responsible head of your organization, refuse to take any amount of money from anyone who is both legally able, and quite willing, to donate to you?  Of course you wouldn’t!  Because such a thing makes no sense.

And yet it has recently come to light in what is, I guess, an effort to highlight its environmental platform, that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is now no longer accepting campaign contributions from those companies involved in the production, and/or sale, of ‘fossil fuels.’  Executive members of the DNC have now voted to ban all contributions from corporate political action committees related to the oil, gas and coal industries.  The resolution was originally proposed by Christine Pelosi, a member of the DNC and daughter of Nancy Pelosi.

It was this past Sunday that Christine Pelosi said, “Today we can act — in harmony with the millions of Americans demanding that we clean up our planet and our politics and join the hundreds of individual Democratic political candidates for office across the country who have pledged not to take money from the fossil fuel industry.”  By golly, the left wing nut certainly doesn’t fall far from the tree.  And apparently the DNC is also said to be considering a second resolution to ban all contributions over $200 from any individual who works in the fossil fuel sector.

It was not immediately clear how this new rule will come to affect the Democrat Party.  Fossil fuel companies have long favored Republican candidates and already do not donate all that much to Democrat candidates, comparatively speaking.  According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the DNC received $2.6 million from mining firms and fossil fuel producers during the 2016 election. This figure pales in comparison to the $56.1 million in contributions that the real estate and finance industries gave to Democrats during the same election cycle.

Now I suppose it could be argued why is it that any company involved in the ‘fossil fuel’ industry would choose to donate to a political party whose only interest seems to be in driving them out of business?  But, I must say, stranger things have happened.  Granted, in the big scheme of things it really isn’t all that much money that’s collected in the first place from those companies in the oil and gas business.  Which makes this recent declaration from the Democrats, about refusing their money, nothing more than the BS we typically get from Democrats.

In 2016 1.1 million employees worked in traditional coal, oil, and gas. The DNC is broke yet the plan is to give up ALL contributions from those folks in a show of virtue?  I love how the Democrats remain adrift in an ocean of hypocrisy. They keep throwing all manner of crap against the wall.  What are they expecting to have happen, that people will suddenly flock to them?  And given the amount regulations the Democrats seek to pile on energy producers why would they expect donations in the first place.  That’s akin to Muslims refusing donations from pork producers.

Perhaps those companies involved in producing America’s gas, oil and coal, along with their retail outlets, should decide that it has become in their best interest to not sell ANY of their products to those who are in any way affiliated with the Democrat Party for use in their vehicles or homes.  We know Democrats will immediately seek to outlaw use of fossil fuels if they ever again regain the power to do so.  These Democrats are so courageous.   Might we expect to see the Republican Party counter by announcing a ban on donations from MS-13? (sarcasm added)

TRY AS HE MIGHT, PEREZ JUST CAN’T GET HIS TEAM TO COME TOGETHER…

Perez

I had an old English teacher back in late 60s who was fond of saying, “Profanity is just a weak mind trying to express itself.”  And when it comes to having a weak mind it’s difficult to top nearly any Democrat, and it’s these days that it would be impossible to top the new head of the DNC, Tom Perez.  You see, this continued spewing of profanity by Perez doesn’t seem to be doing the trick when it comes to his attempts to bring his party together.  The new chair of the DNC recently began cursing, “Republicans don’t give a shit about people”, in what I can only assume was an attempt on his part to fire up the base as he goes about trying to unify the party against President Trump.  But in the three months since the party chose Perez over Moslem Brotherhood supporter Keith Ellison, as DNC chair, Perez has struggled to bridge the gap between the establishment and socialist wings of his party.

And it would appear that Perez and the DNC have been especially unsuccessful in convincing their supporters to give the same kind of money the RNC has managed to bring in.  The DNC brought in just $4.7 million in April which was less than half of the RNC’s $9.6 million haul over that same period of time.  The RNC finished the month with $41.4 million cash on hand, dwarfing the DNC’s $8.8 million in cash on hand.  RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel took a victory lap after the numbers showed the RNC again dominating the DNC in the fundraising game.  She said, “These numbers are evidence of the overwhelming enthusiasm for President Trump and the tireless work by Republicans everywhere to ensure we work together to build on our majorities and elect Republicans up and down the ballot headed into 2017, 2018, and beyond.”  I’m just not sure money raised is the gauge we should be using regarding future elections.

Perez, recognized as being an establishment figure on the left, has been stunningly unsuccessful in his attempt to win over the party’s rapidly expanding left-wing, where many so-called ‘leaders’ actually believe that the party has drifted too far right.  If you can imagine that!  Throughout his speech at a Democrat convention in California over the past weekend, Perez was heckled and interrupted by numerous supporters of self-proclaimed Socialist, and failed presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders.  One of the group’s leading the resistance to Perez was the California Nurses Association who packed the convention hall decked out in red clothing.  The group’s leader, RoseAnn DeMoro criticized the Democrat Party for being out of touch with its base.  It was DeMoro who told the Sacramento Bee, “They are a party in absolute crisis and denial.”  And she added, “They are too comfortable.”

And it was another protester, Gilbert Feliciano, who told the San Diego Tribune, “We are booing because we feel Perez is part of the establishment that keeps co-opting the progressive movement.”  And it was also Gilbert who went on to say, “The corporatists have an ally with Tom Perez. We felt like it was important to come and voice our discontent.”  And apparently the heckling got so bad during Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg’s attempt to speak that the head of the California Democrat Party seized the microphone and told protesters to “shut the fuck up or go outside.”  The struggle for Perez isn’t new.  Perez faced stiff opposition from the Democrat base while running for DNC chair against Ellison, who was a favorite among many Bernie Sanders supporters.  That struggle continued last month when Perez was repeatedly booed during what was meant to be a national unity tour for the party.

And while I would argue that since acquiring their majorities in both houses of Congress, the Republican Party is guilty of having done little more than to encourage a growing number of voters to simply stay home come the next election, it’s the Democrat Party which seems to still be lost at sea with the waves slowly growing higher and higher.  Democrats have no message but hate and transgender bathrooms as well as how we should all love our criminal immigrants.  After all, MS 13 is really nothing more than a bunch of misguided children in need of a free education and some love.  We’re constantly being told that Islam is a peaceful religion and that drug dealers and human traffickers are really nothing more than hard working entrepreneurs trying to make a living and that white privilege, and man caused ‘climate change’ are now the biggest evils that we face in the world today.

And you’d think that with a profane Hispanic racist and a Jew-hating Moslem heading up the DNC, there wouldn’t be any problems left there in loony-liberal land.  Won’t staunchly defending Illegal aliens, damning our President, stymying ALL congressional action, while constantly spewing lies, vile hatred and profanity win over your average undecided voters?  Guess not!  Maybe we should just step aside and let the Democrat Party keep digging their hole.  Look, the party of JFK simply doesn’t exist anymore, having now morphed from being the party of the working man to the party of the elites.  The Democrat Party’s wet dream of a Soviet-style society in the U.S. is still a ways off.  The irony is that they are pushing the Russian collusion narrative when Democrats want the kind of society here in which the government, media, economic and academic elites all live like kings while the rest of us live in public housing.

And you know, it’s kind of a “tragedy”, really, when you stop and think about how it is that our ‘snowflake’ generation allows themselves to be so easily manipulated by those on the left.  It doesn’t bode well for the long time survival of freedom in this country.  After all, these ‘snowflakes’ are the future of our country.  And if that doesn’t send a chill down your spine I’m not sure anything will.  And it’s all just so sad that our little ‘snowflakes’ seem completely incapable of finding it within themselves, and unwilling to even go looking for it, that which is required to stand up to those within our political establishment, our entertainment industry and even to those in the state-controlled media complex.  And it proves that the wussification of America is real, at least as far as our younger generation is concerned, and has been more successful than the Democrats could have ever hoped for.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY: THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THINGS STAY THE SAME…

dnc-1

And so it would seem, at least to me, that what we are now hearing from the new head of the Democrat National Committee doesn’t really sound all that much different from what we heard from the guy who he defeated in what many are now claiming was a rigged election.  Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” while discussing President Trump’s temporary ban on those refugees from seven Moslem-majority countries, preventing them from entering the United States, newly elected Democrat National Committee chairman Tom Perez called it an “ill-advised and frankly racist executive action against Muslims.”  That sounds eerily similar to what we heard from Keith Ellison who is both a Moslem and a long time follower of ‘Calypso Louie’s’ ‘Nation of Islam’, as well as a supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood.

And it was to that masterful purveyor of ‘fake news’, Chuck Todd, that Perez then went on to say, “We see no evidence, Chuck, of anything constructive from this president. Hours into his presidency he made it harder for first-time homebuyers to buy a home. A few days later he tried to make it harder for people to save for retirement. He nominates someone to head the Labor Department who wants to gut overtime pay. He is continually talking one way, but I judge people by their actions. Look at the ill-advised and frankly, racist executive action against Muslims. He has governed from the far right in everything he has done.”  Racist?  Really?  And it was this guy Perez is the one who was described as being someone who was actually a little less extreme than that flaming wackjob, Ellison.

First off, Moslems, or Islam, is not a race, and frankly, it’s not really even a religion.  What it is, if we’re being honest, is nothing more than an ideological cult built entirely on death and hate.  Also, again if we’re being honest, there are many similarities between Islam and the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and even the Nazi Party.  The Nazi Party had 6 foundational principles, one of which was “living space”, which is something Islam believes it will accomplish through territory conquest and “hijrah” which is war through immigration.  Also the Nazi’s believed they were a superior race, Islam also believes that it is a superior ideology and that all non-Moslems must die.  And much like the KKK, Moslems believe that all non-Moslems should get lynched, killed, executed, or have their civil rights taken away.

By the way, let’s not forget the fact that the guy who is now Perez’s second in command, the guy who we’re told he beat ‘fair and square’, who has the reputation of not only hating Jews, but is as well a Moslem who hates America.  And when it comes to this supposed ban that seems to have Democrats’ panties in a bunch, 95 percent of Moslems are not even covered by it.  And it was Barry, not Trump, who identified these seven nations.  But then, maybe a complete ban would be a much better way to.  I mean Moslems aren’t exactly friendly toward America.  Yeah you can say that it’s politically incorrect, but so be it.  It’s past time to ditch political correctness and stand up for America and western civilization. The Moslems never stopped fighting the Crusades.  We need to fight back in every way we can.

And again, I think it’s important that we also not forget just who it was that created the KKK in the first place, and that would be the Democrat Party.  And yet Democrats continue to behave as if they had nothing whatsoever to do with it.  It’s the Democrat Party that is the party with the history of racism, and no matter how hard they may try to rewrite that history they’ll never be able to erase that fact.  And we should never allow them to.  And yet they continue with their partisan claims that it’s the Republican Party that is racist.  Democrats are nothing more than mental midgets, and complete frauds who haven’t a clue about what they’re talking about.  Most are little more than know-it-all, greedy, whining spoiled little brats who think they are superior but who, like the freaks in Hollyweird, haven’t got a clue.

Perhaps the ‘selection’ of Mr. Perez to his new and current position will convince even more white Democrats into seeing the handwriting on the wall.  And that the progressives are now in what appears to be full control of their party.  And that the primary objective of the party has now become to do all that they can in an effort to move forward with what it was that Barry first came into office promising, the “fundamental transformation” of the United States of America.  Yes, the goal of what is today referred to as the ‘Democrat Party’ seeks nothing less than to remake America, and Western Civilization, into an egalitarian Multicultural world governed by grasping global elites who disdain Christian/European tradition and history.  Because nothing is or ever has been worse than white patriarchy.

But like President Trump said, this will likely benefit Republicans.  After all, the more flaming psychos they have out in front of the Democrat Party, the more moderate Democrats, what few that may still remain, will likely leave the party just as so many others did when it was that those in charge chose to rig the primary process to make sure that the psychopathic ‘crooked’ Hitlery was nominated.   Now that’s not to say that all that many of those disaffected Democrats will rush right out and vote for Republicans, but it may be a while before they once again see any benefit from voting for Democrats.  It was a fact that Hitlery was the most corrupt and dishonest candidate to every run for president and that she stole the nomination from Sanders. And it was all the crazy stuff Barry did that likely killed it for her.

And look, Perez is nothing if not a leftwing extremist.  He served in the Department of Justice (DOJ) during the ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton administration, was appointed by Barry to be Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, significantly expanded DOJ’s prosecution of alleged hate crimes, which he depicts as a predominantly white-on-black phenomenon, views “disparate impact”—i.e., instances where particular policies affect whites and nonwhites unequally—as prima facie evidence of discrimination, and he depicts America as a nation rife with injustice against groups such as women, nonwhite minorities, and immigrants. And according to the American Spectator, “Perez has overseen most of the unprecedentedly naked politicization of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.”

And with what is a “creep-factor” of 10, and because the scale only goes up to 10, Perez should never have been given any political power.  He is 100 percent anti-American and anti-white.  He doesn’t believe white people should be protected by the Voting Rights Act!  After all, it was an investigation into the Civil Rights Division by the Department of Justice’s inspector general that revealed the rather extreme views held by Mr. Perez. He told investigators that white people were not entitled to protection under the Voting Rights Act.  Remember, at this moment in time, that the entire modus operandi of all these anti-Americans is to declare any institution, community, religion, race, nation, person or ideology that they have chosen to target for destruction as RACIST.

Christianity is racist. As is any church unless it is run by radical leftists or those who are in service to their revolutionary aims.   Capitalism is racist unless it means using the word capitalism to describe an effort of obtaining bribes from capitalists.  Corporations are racist, unless the corporation is being used to advance cultural poison and subversion.  And any person is deemed to be a racist unless they have submitted to the revolutionary plan.  Any community, race, nation, or ethnicity is racist unless, of course they are non-White.  The whole project comes down to ending debate by using the charge of racism. The answer is not to reason with them, the answer is to mobilize against in numbers that will serve to demoralize them and send them back into the holes from which they crawled.

And rather than circle the wagons and think about what direction the Democrats are going, they double down on their losing ways.  Let’s face it, who but an idiot would continue to do the same thing over and over again that has been a proven to be a failure.  Democrats lost 1,030 seats across the board during Barry’s reign from January 2009 to November 2016.  This includes seats in state’s houses and senates, governorships, and Congress.”  The 2016 elections became the final nail in the coffin, the loss of the White House.  Everyone needs to look beyond President Donald Trump because after the election, the Democrats now “hold the governor’s office and both legislative chambers in just five coastal states: Oregon, California, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Delaware.”

Republicans must strike while the iron is hot, and with the ‘selection’ of Perez as the new head of the Democrat National Committee, and Keith Ellison as his second in command, if there is one constant in this ever changing world, it’s that the Democrat Party will continue to move further and further to left.  And as it does so it will, hopefully, continue to shed more of those who feel left behind by their party. A party that has now become far more focused on catering to those in this country illegally and allow a growing number of those into this country who wish not to assimilate, but to do us harm.  I fear that far too many Republicans may be too squeamish to do what we all know needs to be done.  What they must be made to realize is that the future of their party depends upon doing what they promised us they would do!

WILL THE DEMOCRATS ACTUALLY ‘CHOOSE’ TO GO OVER THE CLIFF???

democrats-48

I guess I just don’t understand how it is that the Democrat mind works, because I don’t get how that they think they will ever be able to convince enough people of the validity of their position, on nearly any issue, by appearing to be nothing less than completely nuts.  Look at the insanity of their positions.  They think that men should be able to use the same restrooms as our wives and daughters, that we should allow a massive influx of ‘refugees’ into this country, with only a minimum of vetting and from countries that we know are active sponsors of terrorism and that we should offer safe haven to known criminals in ‘sanctuary’ cities simply because they are in this country illegally.  While Democrats have always had a fair share of extremists, these days it would seem to be ALL that they have.

And now it’s the Democrat lawmaker now favored to succeed interim Chairmoron Donna Brazile as head of the Democrat National Committee, who has been accused of anti-Semitism.  Rep. Keith Ellison, who was once involved with ‘Calypso Louie’ Farrakhan’s “Nation of Islam” for more than a dozen years, is now said to be leading in this contest, 105-57 over Barry “Almighty’s’ former Labor Secretary, Tom Perez.  During his first run for Congress in 2006, Ellison disavowed Farrakhan and his organization, which has been called a “baseless repudiation” by the Nation of Islam as he mounted his DNC bid.  And the Anti-Defamation League condemned comments Ellison made in 2010 regarding Israel, in which he stated that America’s Middle East policy should not be decided by “what is good [for] a country of 7 million people.”

And of course, as any chronically dishonest and corrupt progressive would, Ellison has since made the claim that those comments were taken completely out of context and “selectively-edited,” and he responded to the ADL’s statement by saying his record instead shows support for Israel as well as an opposition to “racism, sexism and homophobia.”  Ellison was also criticized for remarks he made to an atheist group in 2007 where he compared the Sept. 11 attacks to the Reichstag fire and stopped just short of accusing then-President George W. Bush of having a hand in the attacks.  Ellison said, “It’s almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that.”  And he also said he wouldn’t suggest the U.S. had a hand in the attacks because “you know, that’s how they put you in the nut-ball box — dismiss you.”

And it was very recently that this radical kook, Ellison, went so far as to actually call for an impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.  It was during a ‘debate’ with his fellow DNC chair hopefuls just this past Wednesday on the Communist News Network (CNN), that Ellison said, “I think that Donald Trump has already done a number of things which legitimately raise the question of impeachment.”  And this is a guy who, after this weekend, could very well be the head of the Democrat Party?  For a party in such desperate need of rebuilding itself, how is it that the using of such partisan rhetoric is thought to help in any meaningful way regarding the cause at hand.  I would seem to me that any rational thinking person would want to avoid the moniker of ‘Democrat’ like the proverbial plague.

In an effort to support his claim, Ellison argued that Trump was in violation of the emoluments clause, a constitutional clause which prohibits presidents from receiving payment from foreign governments.  Some Trump opponents have claimed that the Republican is in violation of the federal law because Trump hotels have received payment from foreign dignitaries.  Ellison joins a small fringe group of Democrat lawmakers who have said impeaching Trump is already on the table.  And when I say fringe group, that’s probably a bit of an understatement since this group consists of California’s Maxine Waters, Maryland’s Jamie Raskin and Texas’ Joaquin Castro.  All three have said President Trump should be impeached.  Again, how does insanity encourage people to sign on with the Democrat Party?

Let’s be serious, pursuing Trump for impeachment due to him violating the Emoluments Clause is the epitome of a stupid idea.  The fact is that standing jurisprudence demands that anyone bringing a suit must have standing, and while I am far from being an expert on the subject, there is EXACTLY ZERO CHANCE anyone can prove and/or establish that they have been made to suffer in any way!  None, Zero, Zilch, Nada!! To argue that Trump (as a family industry) gaining profits from the use of his hotels amounts to a gift is stretch unto itself.  Payment for services rendered is not a gift, nor is the use of a hotel in exchange for money.  It’s a fairly standard financial arrangement that a huge swath of the human race engages in daily.  In the end, this lunacy will fail, and you can take that to the bank.

And for some reason, that I am still not quite able to understand, supporters of Ellison seem to take a great deal of pleasure in being able to point to the fact that he was one of the few Democrats to ‘warn’ the party to take then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign seriously, as well as his advocacy for progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders.  Ellison’s candidacy now boasts the support of Sanders, as well as Senate Minority Leader Chuckie Schumer and Sen. Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas Warren, while Tom Perez is said to have former Attorney General Eric Holder and ‘Slow Joe’ Biden in his corner.  The election will be held this weekend in Atlanta, and also includes several other candidates including Sally Boynton Brown and former Chairman Gov. Howard ‘The Screamer’ Dean.  If I was a Democrat I’d be worried.

And let’s not forget how it was that Ellison once said that “black people don’t live in a democracy” and “don’t have an obligation” to obey the government.  He made the comments at a 1992 protest after white police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King.  At least 63 people died in the racially charged riots following the verdict.  Minnesota newspaper the Star Tribune quoted Ellison as telling a group of protesters in Minneapolis that “Black people do not live under a democracy.”  He said, “You don’t have an obligation to obey a government that considers you to be less than human.”  And too, Ellison once called for American blacks to have their own nation and called the U.S. Constitution the “best evidence of a white racist conspiracy to subjugate other peoples.”

But Ellison is by no means the only Democrat member of Congress to have ever belonged to a “Hate Group”.  After all, we had Robert Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, who was a proud member, as well as a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Bobby Rush, Illinois Democrat, who was a member of the New Black Panthers, Ronald Dellums, California Democrat who was also a member of the New Black Panthers and then, of course, there was Cynthia McKinney, Georgia Democrat, who aligned herself with both New Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam. The Democrat Party has a long and rather colorful history of racism.  In fact, the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and of Jim Crow, is the creator of the KKK and the perpetuators of segregation for as long as it could. The Democrat Party has a long reputation as the party of hate.

All of which, I guess, brings me back to where I started, in that I just don’t understand how sounding crazy entices anyone to join your political party.  I mean, how willing will people be, at least those people who possess even the minimal amount of sanity, to join your party if all you do is to sound completely unhinged and continually make all manner of blatant politically incendiary statements?  I mean really, calling for the impeachment of a president who has been in office for only a month?  I mean if your endeavor is to rebuild your party, shouldn’t there come a point when you begin to see the wisdom in at least sounding somewhat coherent and rational?  Apparently not, at least if you’re a Democrat.  As a conservative first, and a Republican second, I truly do hope Ellison becomes the next chair of the DNC.