biden 42

So it’s according to the one who we’re constantly being told is the ‘moderate’ among the current batch of Democrat contenders for president, that “we’re all dead” if fossil fuels continue to be used as one of the world’s primary sources of energy.  And who is this supposed “moderate?”  Well, of course, it’s none other than presidential candidate, and ex-vice president, ‘Crooked Joe’ Biden.  And he made that rather bold assessment regarding our future at a campaign event just this past Sunday.

‘Crooked Joe’ made his rather apocalyptic pronouncement while discussing his take on bogus ‘climate change’ before a ‘crowd’ of supporters in Peterborough, New Hampshire.  And it came about when one of those attending this event began a question to the candidate by saying, “If we don’t stop using fossil fuels–” and ended when ‘Crooked Joe’ interrupted the questioner by saying, “We’re all dead!”  Now he didn’t expound on his rather bold claim figuring, I suppose, that it spoke for itself.

And it was earlier in this very same event that ‘Crooked Joe’ had vowed that as president he would hold energy giants liable for ‘globull warming’ going so far as to make a pledge that he would jail executives of fossil fuel corporations.  ‘Crooked Joe’ said, “We have to set sort of guide rails down now, so between the years 2021 and 2030, it’s irreversible – the path we set ourselves on. And one of which is doing away with any substance for fossil fuels – number one.”  Does that make sense to anyone?

But old ‘Crooked Joe’ wasn’t quite through, nope, not by a long shot, because it was in referencing fossil fuel executives that he then went on to say, “Number two, holding them liable for what they have done, particularly in those cases where your underserved neighborhoods and – you know the deal, okay. And by the way, when they don’t want to deliver, put them in jail. I’m not joking about this.”  So on what basis, or what charges, would ‘Crooked Joe’ move to arrest these individuals?

Now it was unclear if such rules would also apply to certain relatives of his and whether ‘Crooked Joe’ meant that he would also imprison his own son, Hunter ‘Coke Head’ Biden, who served on the board of directors of Ukrainian gas giant Burisma Holdings between 2014-2016. The younger Biden was reportedly paid up to $83,000 as a Burisma board member, despite having virtually no expertise in the energy sector.  But hey, I think we all know the answer to that one, or we at least should.

But Sunday’s remarks weren’t the first time that old ‘Crooked Joe’ advocated jailing business folks.  During June’s DNC debate, the ex-vice president called for insurance executives to be jailed as well for what he described as being “false advertising” practices.  In September, ‘Crooked Joe’ received blowback for attending a fundraiser hosted by an evil fossil fuel company co-founder — Andrew Goldman of Western LNG — after pledging not to accept contributions from the fossil fuel industry.  Hmmm.

Look, even if we went full nuclear power we would still need fossil fuels for many of our machines.  And you can’t tell me that ‘Crooked Joe,’ as well as every other ‘globull warming’ loon doesn’t understand that.  And the fact that they can continue to lie about what is a fact is more than a bit disconcerting.  These people know what they’re saying is a lie, and yet they say it anyway.  There is absolutely NO way, with our current technology that doing away with fossil fuels is in any way possible.

I think most reasonably sane people understand that ‘globull warming’ is nothing more than a hoax perpetrated by those desperate to find a more ‘efficient’ way to control even more of our everyday lives.  Because as we all know it’s everything from ‘climate change’ to ‘gun control’ that Democrats view as being their avenue to greater control over the populace.  And if the populace is ever stupid enough to go along with them then I’m afraid that ‘Crooked Joe’ is right, “we’re all dead!”

And it sounds to me like old ‘Crooked Joe’ just might be trying to ‘trump,’ no pun intended, Hitlery back when she preached to coal miners how she was going to be putting coal mines and coal companies out of business.  Since we now essentially have ‘Crooked Joe’ saying that he intends to go one better, he’s going to close all the natural gas fracking, in Pennsylvania and Ohio and elsewhere, that has provided thousands of jobs and made this nation energy independent for the first time ever.

While I would like to think that the majority of voters in those states most affected by what ‘Crooked Joe’ has promised to do, if elected, will choose not vote for him, you never really know.  There seems to be many on the left who, for whatever reason, continue to believe this tripe about supposed ‘globull warming.’  Obviously they are not someone employed in either the coal or oil business.  But how stupid must you be to believe ANYTHING that you hear coming from ANY Democrat?  It’s all craziness!

So here is a perfect solution that should make everyone happy.  All those who smugly continue to preach that mankind’s use of fossil fuels is in any way having an adverse effect on the climate should collectively stop using them.  And if it is in such urgent need of being addressed, they need to do it today, right now.  But what are the chances of that occurring?  These people are all talk and no action when it comes to making any sort of sacrifice regarding what they claim is the coming apocalypse.

Look, ‘Crooked Joe’ was pretty much of a do nothing vice president under Barry ‘O’. And I’m just not seeing how that, in any way, qualifies him to be president?  Now comparatively speaking, there are times when ‘Crooked Joe’ doesn’t sound quite as nutty as his competition, but when you’re running about claiming that you’re going to imprison folks for no other ‘crime’ than that they head up a corporation, whether it has to do with fossil fuels or perhaps health insurance, that seems a little extreme.

This ‘climate change’ nonsense has been going on for over 50 years and we’ve pretty much run the gamut from a coming ‘ice age’ to ‘globull warming’ and yet nothing ever happens.  But still we have those on the left who seem oblivious to that fact and continue to sound the alarm for a coming apocalypse that never arrives, and those who continue to believe that calamity awaits just around the corner.  Which, I might add, says much more about them than it does about those sounding the alarm.

Also I’d be curious know when ‘Crooked Joe’ thinks that America should invade both India and China for the purpose of overthrowing their governments which then allow us to shut down all of their polluting fossil fueled power plants and to get rid of all their exhaust spewing automobiles that do not comply, even remotely, with the strict measures that America has taken in the name of clean air and water. America is cleaner now than 30 years ago, 40 years ago for sure.  And yet it’s never enough.


Climate Change 33

What are the true believers in the next great apocalypse to befall humankind to do when it’s fewer and fewer people who continue to buy into their ‘Chicken Little’ nonsense and refuse to fall in line behind the notion that in order to somehow save the planet our country, and apparently ONLY our country, MUST first be made to experience what any reasonable person should see as being economic ruin.  It has been over the course of my life that we have gone from ‘climate change’ involving a coming ice age, and after that never materialized we were again warned of ‘climate change’ only this time not involving global cooling, but ‘global warming.’

And it has been ‘global warming’ that, for decades, those on the left have been desperate to convince us, most recently by telling us that we only have 10-12 years left, that we must make the ‘necessary’ sacrifices if we are to have any hope of saving the planet for (wait for it)…‘the children.’  But still too few people are paying this nonsense the level of attention the true believers feel it deserves.  They’ve tried calling this global catastrophe ‘global warming,’ then referred by the more generic, but no less threatening, term of ‘climate change,’ and still the true believers have failed to generate the necessary hysteria needed to turn people into believers.

The cult of ‘climate change,’ and make no mistake that’s really what we’re dealing with here, seems to be experiencing yet another identity crisis, of sorts.  Some in the movement believe that the term ‘climate change’ simply is not frightening enough and that it simply doesn’t conjure up the necessary imagery regarding what the true believers appear to feel is now heading in our direction.  Therefore, they feel, the movement is in need of a rebranding, of sorts, in order to properly rouse the world’s population into action against what a great many non-believers continue to view as being nothing more than a fake calamity, and with very good reason.

It was early in the 21st century that ‘global warming’ was seen as being the term of choice for those doing their best to scare the public into believing that what we were then faced with was a coming disaster that, if we were to have any hope of surviving it, would necessitate a world government. But when the world ceased warming, a new catch-all phrase was needed, so ‘climate change,’ was created to keep the world’s populace fearful than man-made carbon dioxide was destroying our ability to survive. And it’s now that the true-believers are worrying that neither term, ‘global warming’ nor ‘climate change,’ is sufficiently horrific to keep the public properly terrified.

So, in my own little way, I thought I would offer up a few suggestions regarding a few names for this coming non-calamity-calamity we are said to be facing.  And in so doing I found myself wondering if perhaps terms like ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming,’ though scientific in nature were just a bit too neutral sounding.  Do they do enough to grab attention and stir people into action?  I mean, for one thing, what does the term ‘climate change’ really mean?  Most folks view climate on a local basis and expect it to change.  As for ‘global warming,’ if the Earth isn’t warming, as it wasn’t during the first part of this century, the use of the term is a misnomer.

So, what are those suffering from ‘climate hysteria’ supposed to do?  In my search to come up with more appropriate sounding nomenclature I managed to come across what I thought might be, at least potentially, some viable alternatives.  Terms like ‘global meltdown’ or ‘global melting’ might be a couple of possibilities.  Or perhaps terms like “climate collapse” and “climate chaos” would be seen as being sufficiently terrifying.  Now keep in mind here these suggestions were arrived at only after the briefest amount of time spent searching.  And that’s not to say that there could very likely be far more applicable metaphors out there still waiting to be discovered.

Let’s be honest, rebranding is what ad agencies do to sell inferior products that aren’t selling.  And as we all know, any product wearing the moniker of “new and improved” is one to be avoided.  If for no other reason than because such a product is rarely new or, rarer still, improved.  Let those who claim to believe in global warming/climate change lead by example. Not only should they cease flying in their private jets, they should cease traveling altogether.  Moreover, they should turn off their electricity and other utilities and only eat what they find in their yard. By doing so, they would greatly reduce their carbon footprint, and if they want to reduce it to zero, they should stop breathing.


Margolin 1

If ever there was any doubt that we are now busily raising a generation of what are little more than brainwashed little zombies that should have been officially put to rest after what was a classic exercise in ‘climate buffoonery’ which took place in the U.S. House just yesterday.  In what I can only assume was an attempt by Democrat believers to convince the rest of us that they are not talking out of their asses when it comes to their cockamamie religion of ‘man-made climate change’, they thought it appropriate to invite a couple of kids who I fear may just personify those who are the generation to whom we will be passing the baton for the safeguarding of America.

Ms.Jamie Margolin is someone described as being a teen climate activist and it was she who ‘testified,’ on Wednesday, before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, alongside fellow ‘activist’ Greta Thunberg, that the climate “crisis” is directly linked to colonialism and slavery.  Now the fact that Ms. Margolin is a native of Seattle, Washington may likely explaining her naïve willingness for buying into something as ludicrous as ‘climate change.’  And I guess I would be curious to know on just what it is that she bases her rather silly conclusions.  Perhaps they come from her very liberal wackjob parents?

Ms. Margolin was joined by Ms. Thunberg, that famed European climate activist who recently received stunning accolades from ex-president O-bummer, and proceeded to tell U.S. lawmakers that her generation lives with constant “fear and despair” due to the climate crisis and added that ‘climate change’ is directly linked to colonialism, slavery, and natural resource extraction.  She said, “I want the entirety of Congress — in fact, the whole U.S. government — to remember the fear and despair that my generation lives with every day, and I want you to hold on to it.”  Gag me with a spoon!  I’m sorry, but why are we even listening to this child?  Shades of David Hogg!

She asked, “How do I even begin to convey to you what it feels like to know that within my lifetime the destruction that we have already seen from the climate crisis will only get worse?”  What “destruction” is it that she is referring too?  And she went on to suggest that her dreams really do not matter because her generation “has been committed to a planet that is collapsing.”  Collapsing?  Really?  Wow, talk about some pretty heavy doom and gloom.  And then she actually went so far as to scold lawmakers, telling them they should be ashamed of themselves because “youth climate activists should not have to exist” in the first place.  This was such a farce.

While she took on a more optimistic tone when talking about potential solutions, she then veered sharply to the left by painting a darker and more sinister picture of America.  Ms. Margolin said, “Solving the climate crisis goes against everything that our country was unfortunately built on — colonialism, slavery, and natural resource extraction.”  And she added, “This is why the youth are calling for a new era altogether.”  She said, “As Greta mentioned, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that we only have a few months left to create the massive political shift needed to transition our world to an entirely renewable energy economy.”

And it was in citing the commonly touted ten-year deadline that she said, “This needs to happen within the next ten years, which is our deadline to save life as we know it,” adding that she would like her generation to be known as “Generation GND” for the “Green New Deal” rather than Generation Z.  Margolin revisited her argument on colonialism later on and urged the U.S. to listen to “indigenous protectors” in Latin America. However, she warned America to “not perpetuate the same systems of oppression that have been pushing them down.”  You simply cannot make this shit up!  Why is she even worth listening to?  Because she’s NOT!

And then she went on to accuse America of “trying to colonize” its way out of the climate crisis.  She said, “And right now something that has been disturbing me a lot is seeing the way that we are trying to colonize and buy and sell our way out of a problem caused by colonization and buying and selling.”  I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised by the level of drivel spewed by this teenage ‘zealot’ as she represents the caliber of citizen now being churned out by our government run public education system.  And it’s with each new graduating class that America, as a whole, becomes just a bit dumber, placing the survival of our country all the more in doubt.

The lying communist propagandists have been heralding the end of the world for close to a century. I wish little Greta and her ilk would go live on a deserted island with zero resource extraction and zero combustible engines and see how much fun it is digging for roots to eat and living in a mud hut.  Unfortunately the Democrats have succeeded in turning our public education system into a liberal indoctrination system which is producing millions of American children with no judgement or critical thinking skills and no knowledge of basic science. They are easily programmed to believe almost anything their teachers or the mass media put into their heads.

Democrats are using children as human shields against criticism of their outlandish climate hope and change agenda. It’s the same strategy they used when O-Bummer was president saying, “You can’t criticize Obama’s policies, because that would be racist,” or “You can’t criticize what children say about man-made climate change, because that would prove that you hate children.”  It was during WWII that Germany indoctrinated its children and made them into perfect Hitler Youth. The left has infiltrated our schools and is doing the same thing on multiple agendas.  Sad to say, but propaganda works and now the left has its little programmed foot soldiers.

This teenager tells Congress how horrible it is to be young with so much looming uncertainty ahead.  Guess what, Chickie, when I was your age they were saying chlorofluorocarbons were going to block out the sun and we were going to have another ice age and either freeze or starve to death. If you’re that concerned, maybe instead of whining to Congress you should go to places who are the worst offenders and complain to them.  Get THEM to do something about it. What a generation of wussies. Every generation in history has grown up with uncertainties, whether it was the atom bomb or wondering if you were going to catch the plague.

But at least she can memorize the talking points her handlers provided to her. She wouldn’t know about or understand colonialism or slavery, other than the version of history her ‘teachers’ have been feeding her since kindergarten. She doesn’t have the age, the background, or the experience to have seen it in action in any of the Arab or African countries where it’s still practiced, or the various versions practiced in India and other South East Asian countries where being of a lower caste is the same as being a slave because you aren’t allowed to move up. She’s a fake and a fraud, and the Democrats will bow to her all the way to our destruction if we let them.


In listening to any of the Democrats currently embroiled in the race to become our next president, if there can be said to be one certainty in our ever changing world, it’s the manner in which any one of them now chooses to describe ‘climate change,’ that being as an existential threat.  And the Democrat presidential wannabes are just as unified in their continuing to sound the alarm for that which does not even exist.

And while she has sounded the alarm before, on any number of occasions, it was again just last week that Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren, senior Senator from Massachusetts and presidential hopeful, sent out a Tweet last Thursday evening that linked to a New York Times story about the Trump administration loosening regulations on methane and in which she again described ‘climate change’ as an “existential crisis.”

“Climate change is an existential crisis,” Pocahontas warned yet again.  And she went on to say, “We should be enforcing and strengthening our environmental regulations—not rolling them back.”  The New York Times piece for which she provided her link was entitled: “Curbs on Methane, Potent Greenhouse gas, to be Relaxed in U.S.”  And I think the title alone made it very clear the message that the piece contained.

It said, “The Trump administration laid out on Thursday a far-reaching plan to cut back on the regulation of methane emissions, a major contributor to climate change.” And went on to say, “The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule aims to eliminate federal requirements that oil and gas companies install technology to detect and fix methane leaks from wells, pipelines and storage facilities.”

And it also said, “It would also reopen the question of whether the E.P.A. had the legal authority to regulate methane as a pollutant.”  The New York Times has never been a publication that I have paid all that much attention to.  Usually about the same amount of attention that I tend to pay to most Democrats.  After all, it’s those in both the ‘fake news’ media and the Democrat Party that hate America.

I really don’t mind being the one to break it to old Liz, as well as her many leftwing compatriots such as the New York Times, and at that the same time taking a certain amount of pleasure in doing so, that it is countless thousands of American scientists disagree with all if the nonsense.  Over 33,000 of them signed a declaration stating that “manmade global warming” has no basis in science.  Imagine that.

Furthermore, it was released just last month that, courtesy of an improved system to assess surface temperatures established in 2005 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, there has been no warming in the United States at all, above the previous mean temp average since 2005. Democrats routinely suppress thousands of scientists who disagree with their myopic and political brainwashing.

Before telling we Deplorables how to run our lives, perhaps these ‘Chicken Littles’ should visit China, India, and any number of other nations that have little or no environmental regulations and tell them how to run THEIR lives.  They pollute many times over what America may still pollute.  Personally I think she is all SCAM with no PLAN, other than the Democrat plan to control every aspect of our Society.

‘Climate change’ is nothing more than a ploy, a ploy with a specific purpose, that of course being to give government more control, if not complete control, over privately owned companies/businesses, aka Socialism.  It’s an effort to distract voters from what Democrats have been doing for decades: raiding the public treasury, bankrupting the country, and allowing millions to flood into our country illegally.

So the true existential threat that we in this country are made to face today is the threat that comes from those within the Democrat Party.  Democrats, as well as those who support their agenda, hate this country and want nothing less than to see it destroyed. And the Democrats seek to control whatever may be left.  Hopefully the American people will not be foolish enough to elect ANY Democrat president.

Oddly enough it’s in her own state that even Barry ‘O’ seems not to believe all of the ‘climate change’ hype as he recently purchased a $15 million mansion on Martha’s Vineyard which, or so we are told, is supposed to be underwater in just a few years.  So apparently property values in the area have not dropped, so those folks there too must recognize that all the warnings about ‘climate change’ have no basis in science.

Warren is a far leftwing radical and a liar, that’s simply a fact!  Her ideas and her ideology are not compatible with the U.S. Constitution!  In fact, her ideology is anti-America, and anti-freedom!  She stands for big government being able to control of your life, in other words, ‘tyranny.’  Which is the complete opposite of freedom! Your grandchildren will thank those of us who refuse to allow her ideology to stand!



Reid 1

Democrats have a long, and rather storied, history when it comes to sounding the alarm for what they say is the need to protect ‘Mother Earth’ from the many evils of man and to warn us the time for doing something about it is rapidly running out.  Democrats have said that we have somewhere between 10 and 12 years before the planet is reduced to what will be nothing but a lifeless rock floating through space.  And it matters not how much evidence is produced that refutes their many idiotic claims, they continue to do all that they can to advance their cause and they seem to thrive on the insanity that is required to support the lunacy of ‘climate change.’

Which brings me to ex-Senate Majority Leader ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid, Democrat, someone who has chosen to remain anything but silent since leaving the powerful post he held in the Senate, including advising several of the 2020 Democrat presidential hopefuls, writing various op-eds, and granting interviews with many of those in our ‘fake news’ media.  It was in the New York Times that he put pen to paper and wrote about getting rid of the filibuster rule in the Senate that he helped to install, claiming in today’s political climate nothing can get done.  ‘Dingy Harry’ said it was the filibuster that helped him to advance ex-president Barry ‘O’s radical leftwing agenda.

But it was during an interview on National Public Radio (NPR) that old ‘Dingy’ advanced the notion that the most pressing issue our country now faces, and that Congress needs to address, is ‘climate change.’  He said, “I think we need to take a very close look at getting rid of the filibuster, period.”  And it was NPR’s host of Weekend Edition Sunday who then followed up to ask, “Doesn’t that create a situation where one party gets to railroad the other party depending on who is in charge of that upper chamber?”  And ‘Dingy Harry’ said that without the filibuster a majority, instead of 60 votes, could actually make things happen.

‘Dingy Harry’ said, “It’s important, because let’s take some major issues the country faces.”  And he went on to say, “No issue in my mind is more important than climate change.”  He said, “It is devastating our world.  The United States must be a leader in this.”  And of course he went on to say, “But with Trump and basically Republicans saying that climate change doesn’t exist, we’re getting nothing done, I mean nothing, we don’t have a lot of time to spare.”  But President Trump and the Republicans, minus RINOS like Romney, are not saying that ‘climate change’ doesn’t exist, they’re simply saying that there is zero proof that man has anything to do with it.

For instance, when climate alarmists claim to have witnessed the effects of global warming, they must be referring to at least 14 years ago. That’s because there has been no warming in the United States since at least 2005, according to updated data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  In January 2005, NOAA began recording temperatures at its newly built U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN). USCRN includes 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states and in locations far away from urban and land-development impacts that might taint temperature readings.

Poo-poo, the Democrats will all say as they regurgitate, once again, their bogus claim of how 97-98 percent of all supposed climate ‘experts’ agree with them on the issue of ‘global warming’, ‘climate change’ or ‘climate disruption’.  You see, Democrats have many names for that which they seek to convince us of what is said to be the next grand apocalypse to be faced by man, and one that he himself is responsible for bringing about.   But it’s all nothing more than smoke and mirrors, a ploy the Democrats have been using for decades to convince the American people to grant to the government the ability to better control every aspect of their lives.

It was back in the sixties it was many of these very same con artists who were busy pushing ‘Zero Population Growth’ as being necessary to save the planet! Now that Western Civilization has nearly achieved that goal they move the goalposts and tell us they need population replacement to maintain our economy!  I hate to tell them this but flooding our economy with thirty million economic basket cases isn’t a winning strategy!  It’s beginning to look like these clueless so-called experts (aka drips under pressure) have had their collective head buried up their collective ASS all along!  But who among us would be the least surprised to find that out?

And then it was during roughly the same period that there came all manner of warnings about ‘global cooling’ and how some new ice age was looming just over the horizon.  That too never really materialized.  And then somehow we managed to transition away from ‘global cooling’ and that new ice age, to ‘global warming’ all in what I think was a matter of a decade.  So tell me again why it is that we should spend any amount of time listening to any of these supposed climate ‘experts’ who in all likelihood don’t have a clue as to what they are talking about and, as a result, are all doing little more than simply blowing smoke.  It just makes no sense.

And as much as I hate to disagree with old ‘Dingy Harry’, I would argue that the most pressing issue that our country now faces, and one that the voters must address in the coming election, and likely every election to follow, is the continuing rising tide of Socialism in America.  As we can all now very plainly see, there is a very determined effort now underway by many in the Democrat Party, to advance the heavy hand of socialism in this country.  Socialism and individual freedoms are not exactly what one could describe as being compatible, making for a rather frightening scenario at the hands of the Democrats.  Democrats are far more dangerous than is ‘climate change.’



If there is one thing I think we can all agree on it’s that a guy who was once a pretty obscure U.S Senator and who was, quite possibly, the worst secretary of state in the history of this country, would likely know very little regarding the true definition of leadership.  After all, he’s also the guy who, courtesy of a couple self-inflicted wounds, was able to spend an extraordinarily brief time, 4 months, in Vietnam, wrote his own award citations for those same self-inflicted wounds, had his military records sealed, and was so disliked by fellow Swift Boat commanders that they wrote a book about him called ‘Unfit for Command’.  And yet, he still feels justified in lecturing us all on something that we are all smart enough to see as being completely bogus.

Now of course he of whom I speak is none other than that most useless of human beings and he who is essentially nothing more than a waste of skin, John Kerry Heinz.  Now it was earlier this week that Kerry-Heinz testified before the House Oversight Committee, and it was during that ‘testimony’ that this buffoon made the rather hilarious claim that freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated more leadership on combating ‘global warming’ than President Trump “has in his lifetime.”  Frankly, I’m not sure how it was that he was able to make such an idiotic statement while at the same time being able to maintain a straight face, but I was even more amazed that those to whom he was speaking didn’t simply laugh in his face.

A partial transcript of the exchange is as follows:

REP. JAMES COMER (Republican): Secretary Kerry, my question to you is printing a lot of new money and opening a bunch of new public banks is a real way to pay for this Green New Deal project proposal?

JOHN KERRY HEINZ (Moron): Well, let me begin by saying, Congressman, there are a lot of different proposals about how to proceed. I don’t know that any of them are coming from your party or your side of the aisle. Do you have a plan to deal with climate change? I think you said you’re not sure of the science. But my focus is on how we’re going to move forward and we all have some differences about one piece of legislation or another, but in proposing in what she has proposed together with Senator Markey, Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez has, in fact, offered more leadership in one day or in one week than President Trump has in his lifetime on this subject.

So, we’re talking about it, and my question is where is your proposal? Did you have any hearings on it in the last few years? Mostly on Benghazi, if I can recall, when I was up here. So, I think what we ought to do is stop the politics and get down to really serving the people of West Virginia and Kentucky.

Morons like Ocasio-Cortez and John Kerry Heinz don’t lead, they’re merely puppets.  In fact I would go so far as to say the entire concept of leadership is something that would be completely foreign to the both of them.  They are nothing but pathetic little followers who do nothing more than to say exactly what they are told to say.  Perhaps if these hypocrites were to act in a more convincing and responsible manner, one that would reflect that they may actually believe their own hype, hype that the rest of us are expected to take a face value, they might be easier to trust.  But as long as they reside in multiple mansions and commute by private jets I’ll continue to take their predictions of doom and gloom with little more than a grain of salt.

Kerry-Heinz is without a doubt the single most delusional idiot to ever occupy the office of Secretary of State, worse even than Hitlery, and the ‘negotiator’ of the worst ‘deal’ ever to be dreamt up, aka the obvious attempt to provide Iran with nuclear weapons.  And it is now his opinion that the most delusional imbecile to ever be elected to the House of Representatives has given us this great idea, one which will require more money to be spent than exists in the entire world and which will still not change the climate one iota!  And according to Kerry-Heinz that is what can now be defined as leadership on an issue that Kerry-Heinz has long supported going all the way back to when we were being warned about a coming ‘ice age.’

The entire premise of man-made ‘climate change’, ‘global warming’, ‘climate disruption’ or whatever else the Democrats wish to call it, is really nothing more than an attempt, on a rather massive scale, by our government to limit our ‘freedoms’ and control our way of life in America.  These people believe that our rights do not come from God, but from those in power who should possess the ability to restrict those rights as a way to guarantee obedience to those ‘in charge.’  Failure to do so would then naturally result in the loss of any rights thought appropriate resulting in making citizens less like responsible individuals living in freedom and more like slaves to their government masters.  And make no mistake, control is what the end goal is here.

Faulty science, bogus computer models, and what is a leftist political agenda are the basis for what continues to be one of the greatest con jobs ever to be perpetrated against not only the American people, but people all across the planet.  And while most people will agree that, yes, so-called climate change is in fact taking place, the vast majority of them also see it as being nothing more than a naturally occurring phenomenon and as nothing that can be said to be the fault of man.   And like everything else that Democrats are attempting to foist upon the American people, it has much more to do with the devising of new and improved ways to better control the masses than it has anything to do with the solving of any ‘climate’ problem.

In the 1970s and 80s it was a new ice age that we were being warned about.  After that it was holes in the ozone layer, then acid rain then global warming now it’s the all-encompassing term of ‘climate change.’  The Democrats never stop with they’re fear-mongering.  And it was Kerry-Heinz who was right there out in front as one of those leading the charge.  And it’s these very same Democrats who are always busily thinking up new and ‘improved’ ways to spend the U.S. into oblivion such as the Green Deal, Reparations, Obamacare, allowing the of illegal immigrants into this country and on and on.  The Democrats no longer care if America is destroyed as long as it is they who get to rule over the ruins.  Absolutely nothing else matters to them.


Climate Change 29

I think few people can dispute the fact that, especially after having watched the goings on of the last 2+ years, Democrats just love taking part in all manner of hoaxes.  But if we’re being honest, the Democrat Party’s continuing claim that they are the guardians of the poor and unfortunate has long been nothing more than a hoax perpetrated upon the American people.  Although, I must say with the arrival of Barry ‘O’ onto scene, there has been a willingness on the part of Democrats to finally come out of the shadows and be much more ‘ honest’ with the American people about what it is they wish to shove down their throats courtesy of their radical socialist agenda.

And the one continuing hoax upon which the Democrat Party has spent a great deal of time, energy and money in their effort to keep it alive, is, of course, the hoax that is ‘man made climate change.’  And make no mistake it is definitely a hoax.  But being the ‘never say die’ kinda folks these people are, I’m guessing they figure if they talk about it enough the less intelligent among us will finally come around and accept as fact all of the nonsense that they’re being told.  Which, of course, brings me to that well-known supporter of ALL manner of leftwing hoaxes, no matter how crazy or false they may be, Chuckie Schumer.  No hoax is too radical for Chuckie to support.

You see, it was just this past Wednesday that Chuckie took to the Senate floor, shortly after the chamber voted on what’s being called the ‘Green New Deal’, and made the rather bold, and patently dishonest, claim that manmade ‘climate change’ is in fact very real and that “flooding, tornadoes, and wildfires” would continue. Chuckie said, “Temperatures will still go up. The oceans will still rise.”  And he rambled on saying, “The terrible kinds of disaster–flooding, tornadoes, and wildfires–that we have had will continue.”  But in truth it’s all nothing more than pure political BS perpetrated by a group of people who really do HATE America!

What apparently prompted this bizarre display, or Chuckie’s most recent trip into ‘climate change’ fantasyland, was that earlier in the day Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell offered a motion to bring that nitwit Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘Green New Deal’ up for a vote, which would require getting 60 senators to agree to cloture. Fifty-seven members—including 54 Republicans and 3 Democrats—voted to block the vote on the Green New Deal.  And too, rather than vote in favor of having a vote on the Green New Deal, 43 members, all of them Democrats, simply chose to vote ‘present.’  Yup, nothing like having the courage to stand up for your agenda.

Chuckie then proudly stood on his soapbox, giving a ‘speech’, which was more of a rant really, during which he claimed that “McConnell’s stunt” had “boomeranged on him.” He also applauded McConnell for telling reporters later that he believed that manmade ‘climate change’ was in fact taking place.  While I didn’t hear specifically what McConnell might have said, there are a great many people who do agree that ‘climate change’ is in fact taking place, but it’s whether it can safely be declared to be ‘man made’ that continues to be the sticking point.  Because there is NO consensus and NO science, other than among Democrats, that that is in fact the case.

But anyway, be that as it may, what follows here is a little excerpt of Chuckie’s idiotic rant made from the floor of the Senate:

“McConnell’s stunt, again, boomeranged on him and his colleagues, and they finally had to discuss this issue rather than do what they have liked to do for the last 5 years and sweep it under the rug.

Yesterday, the day before, today, and continuing in the future, we ask our Republican colleagues three simple questions to which they owe an answer to their constituents. First, do you believe climate change is real? Second, do you believe climate change is caused by human activity? And third, do you believe Congress has to act immediately to deal with this problem?

We are finally getting some answers, thanks to McConnell’s trick that he eventually played on himself. No less than Leader McConnell was asked by the press yesterday afternoon at his Ohio Clock press camp if he believes in climate change, and he said he believes it is real and he believes it is caused by human activity. Well, there is one more step if you believe all that: What is your answer–not what you are against but what you are for?

I want to commend Senators Roberts, Alexander, and Murkowski. They came to the floor and stated unequivocally and clearly that climate change is real and caused by humans. Make no mistake, in this glacial atmosphere controlled by the Republicans, when it comes to climate change, this is real progress, but, of course, it is not close to enough.

As to the third question, Leader McConnell offered no solution. All we got was a sham vote that he voted against. So I ask Leader McConnell: What is your plan? Some Republicans now seem to admit the challenges of climate change. OK, that is good. Now, what is your solution?

Turning the Senate floor into a campaign ad studio is not a solution to climate change, nor is it very effective even for their own purposes. Several Senators seemed to suggest that this problem can simply be solved by funding for more research. I support funding for research. It should be part of any climate plan. Yet I say to my friends–particularly, those from coal States–that is not going to solve the problem. Dealing with coal sequestration and coal technology will, at best, solve 1 percent of the problem. So I say to my friends:

What about the other 99 percent, because 1 percent isn’t enough? Temperatures will still go up. The oceans will still rise. The terrible kinds of disaster–flooding, tornadoes, and wildfires–that we have had will continue. To simply say that you are doing some research into how to deal with coal is not close to solving the problem. …

I am glad that finally, though–this is the good news here–some of my colleagues are starting to see the light and admit that it is real and admit that it is caused by human activity. Now, they need to put their money where their mouth is and work with us to take action that matches the scale of the problem.”

It goes without saying that Democrats have a rather long history of claiming to be prophets, of a sort, like modern day Nostradamus’s making all manner of dire predictions of pending Republican inspired disasters.  And in so doing they continue to demonstrate just how stupid they think we all are!  And I don’t know if they know it’s all a lie, or if they actually believe their own propaganda while refusing to accept anything that calls it into question, and I’m not sure which is worse.  They have been spouting the same crap for decades, claiming they seek only to protect us from all those evil Republicans who they claim actually WANT dirty air and dirty water!

But this, just like every other hoax they’ve ever attempted to foist upon the American people, has nothing to do with having the best interests of the American people at heart.  What Democrats are all about, and I mean ALL about, is coming up with ever more inventive ways to control the lives of ALL Americans.  And it is this ‘climate change’ nonsense that they seem to think provides them the best opportunity to do that. And make no mistake, if the American people are ever again foolish enough to hand complete control of their government over to these climate zealots, Democrats will no longer seek to convince us of these supposed dangers, they will simply act.


Schumer 34

It was in sounding like some soon-to-be-supporter of that cockamamie boondoggle called the ‘Green New Deal’, that none other than that very well-known climate scientist, Chuckie Schumer recently took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to deliver a speech the central point of which, of course, was to criticize President Trump for his State of the Union Address.  Chuckie’s bone of contention, among other things, was that the president failed to even mention the issue of “climate change,” which we all know is an issue that is very near and dear to the heart of EVERY Democrat.

Chuckie said, “He talked about the future of America and didn’t even mention climate change.”  And added, “How could you do that? Chuckie claimed, “Every scientist who has studied it knows that in the next 10, 20, 30 or 40 years, climate change is going to evoke huge changes in our country and in our world.”  He went on to say, “If you believe in the future and you want to have a good future for our children and grandchildren, which we all do, you can’t ignore climate change.”  He said, “You may have different views on it, but you can’t ignore it,” he said.

Now let’s just say for the sake of argument that Chuckie and his fellow America-hating colleagues there in the Democrat Party are right in all of their claims about ‘Climate change’, ‘global warming’, ‘climate disruption’ or WHATEVER they wish to call it.  If both, the Arctic and Antarctic polar ice caps were to melt completely, and New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and every other large Democrat-infested coastal metropolitan area were to become inundated with tsunami waves and flooding like we’ve never seen, would that necessarily be a bad thing?

And another thing, it’s on one hand that Chuckie claims to be just oh so concerned about our children and grandchildren and yet the other hand he seems to have absolutely no problem whatsoever with allowing women the RIGHT to murder those very same children and grandchildren, even AFTER they have been born.  That, to me, is the worst kind of hypocrisy.  To the point I can’t help but wonder how is it that anyone bothers to even listen to this guy.  There is NOTHING true or real in ANYTHING that he says.  Everything, and I mean everything, he says has it purpose in politics.

But let’s be real, I think it goes without saying that the odds are pretty good that our climate will change over the course of the next 40 years, or even the next 12 years.  It always has in the past and so we should expect it to continue to change in the future.  What should we do about it?  Well, we do what our ancestors have always done, we adapt.  Our ancestors knew enough to come in out of the rain or to wear a garment when it was cold and to take that garment off when it got hot. God gave most folks a brain, the ability to feel cold and heat and the commonsense to adapt.

It is a provable scientific fact that our climate has changed over the years, therefore it is more than reasonable to assume that it will continue to change into the future. But, anyone that actually believes that mankind has any power and/or control over this is either sadly mistaken or is purposely lying for some agenda driven reason. I remember very well when Al Gore was preaching back in the 1970’s that the next ice age was upon us if we didn’t change our ways! There are people in this world that want to control people and their resources. That is what this is really all about!

It’s just incredible to me that we still have people like Chuckie, and his brothers-in-arm there on the left, who actually seem to think that they are somehow more powerful than God Himself! They always say that scientists that study ‘climate change’ always find it alarming, but, they never reference the majority of scientists who disagree.  Fluctuations in our climate are going to occur, it’s a no brainer, and we should avoid reading too much into them. And we should also resist being convinced that there is actually something we can do to have any impact on them.

Make no mistake, the Senator from Wall Street is not in the habit of making predictions, what he does is to announce his intentions. There is a goal here, one talked about only when behind closed doors.  You see, once the left has succeeded in reducing white Christians to a small minority, completely disarmed, and replaced by the third world hoards that they are now actively encouraging to come here, they will use their archaic environmental laws to reduce their indentured servants to the same level of genteel poverty that they fled when enticed to come to this country.



Well it’s official folks, this big blue marble that we all call home is going to be coming to a rather unceremonious end somewhere around 2030, plus or minus a year or two, unless we here in America change our greedy, self-destructive ways.  Now mind you, it doesn’t matter squat what other countries do, or don’t do, but we here in America must now mend our evil ways, and apparently shoulder the entire burden in what will be the effort to avert what has been described by many on the kooky left fringe, as the next apocalypse.  And it matters not how many times we’ve heard this same story before, only to have the next much heralded apocalypse never quite materialize.  This is all nothing more than the next act in the continuing scam of ‘climate change.’

This time around it is everyone’s favorite dingbat-socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has made the rather bold prediction that the world will quite literally stop spinning in just a dozen years if “climate change” continues to go unchecked.  Ocasio-Cortez is pushing a new plan in Congress, one which she calls her “Green New Deal,” to confront climate matters.  And yes, it’s just as nutty as it sounds.  For example, her ‘Green New Deal’ proposes to “cut military spending by at least half” and calls for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from overseas.  And it also proposes eliminating nuclear, natural gas, LNG, oil and coal in the next eleven years.  And never mind that that accounts for about 88 percent of America’s current energy sources.

And it doesn’t end there, not by a long shot.  Because this exercise in leftwing lunacy referred to as the ‘Green New Deal’ also calls for a ban on all non-electric cars, and all “non-essential” cars.  But who is it that gets to decide whether your car is a “non-essential individual means of transport”?   The Green New Deal would eliminate unemployment benefits, instead turning the federal government into the “employer of last resort,” for a few hundred billion a year.  The ‘Green New Deal’ declares, “a British think tank recently put out a study saying that all fossil fuels could be eliminated in 10 years.”  Now granted, I am far from an expert on such matters, but does one really need to be to recognize the pure insanity of such a statement?

And of course it was this genius, Ocasio-Cortez, who said, “I think that the part of it that is generational is that millennials and Gen-Z and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we’re like, ‘The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change,’ and your biggest issue is–your biggest issue is, ‘How are we going to pay for it?’”  She went on to say, “And, like, this is the war; this is our World War II.”  Ocasio-Cortez was speaking during an interview with Ta-Nehisi Coutes, a leftist writer, at Riverside Church in Harlem in New York City for their Martin Luther King, Jr., Day MLKNOW event.  She was, of course, celebrated by those on the brain dead left for the stand she is taking for her “Green New Deal” plan.

But Ocasio-Cortez’s push for the idea that there is now headed straight for us some coming crisis resulting from supposed ‘climate change’ and that it MUST be averted no matter what the cost is remarkably similar to the many claims made by ex-vice president Algore over the years going all the way back to 1992.  It was from there that Algore would go on to spend the better part of the next couple of decades pushing one cockamamie theory after another in his effort to justify that there is a climate crisis, in some cases citing claims that the polar ice caps would disappear by 2014. Algore made those claims in the mid-2000s, years before 2014, but 2014 has long since passed, and the polar ice caps, in case you haven’t noticed, are still there.

Regarding Algore’s reason for continuing to peddle this nonsense, it’s all pretty simple really, it has made him very, VERY wealthy.  However, in the case of the very loony Ocasio-Cortez, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to separate her delusional side from her stupid side.  And at the risk of stating the obvious here, ‘climate change’ has never been about manmade ‘climate change.’ If manmade ‘climate change’ were real, the high priests, like Algore, of this new religion wouldn’t have a house that consumes roughly the same amount of energy as does a small village and fly around on a private jets.  The ‘climate change’ lunacy is about control. Scratch a leftist and just below the shiny surface is a dictator just waiting for his, or her, chance.

There is no better illustration than the one provided to us by none other than Barry ‘O’ when he said, “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes at 72° at all times..and then expect that other countries are going to say OK. That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen.”  The Left wants to control your vehicle, your diet, your home, it wants to control every aspect of your life. In reality, their vision of that ever elusive ‘utopia’ is nothing more than what’s left of humanity after being sent back to the days of cave men.  And I fail to understand how it is that any reasonably intelligent individual, regardless of gender, political affiliation or ethnic background is unable to see right through what’s being attempted here,

Because what’s being stated here defies completely all reason and logic, as well as physics. Give me some manner of actual proof, some scientific fact, and not some mindless political drivel, for why I should buy into the claim that this celestial body that we call home, and that has been spinning for God knows how long, is suddenly going to, in just 12 short years, stop spinning.  It simply makes no sense, and I find it all rather mindboggling that those making such claims are not being laughed at hysterically.  I mean, how stupid must you be to believe that which has been proven to be wrong more times than I care to count.  The entire premise on which this theory is based is nothing but a work of political fiction, and it needs to be seen as such!


tornado 2

Call me what you will, a denier or even a flat-earther, but it seems to me that the more dire the prediction about how ‘climate change’ causes everything from increasingly violent storms to rising sea levels, the rarer it is that any of these predictions ever materialize.  A case in point is how, despite dire predictions of an increase in severe weather events due to ‘climate change’, the Washington Post says 2018 is poised to become the first year on record with no violent tornadoes in the U.S.

And yet it was according to the Post’s ‘weather writer’, Ian Livingston, that while it may indeed be record-breaking, 2018 is not altogether exceptional, since “there have been downtrends in violent tornado numbers both across the entire modern period, and when looking at just the period since Doppler radar was fully implemented across the country in the mid-1990s.”  And it was that he went on to say, “A 15-year average as high as 13.7 in the mid-1970s will drop to 5.9 next year.”

And 2018 will not only set a record for zero “violent” tornadoes, or those ranked EF4 or EF5 on a 5-point scale, but will likely also set a record as well for the fewest “intense” tornadoes (F/EF3+).  With just two days to go, 2018 has seen only 12 intense tornadoes in the U.S., three fewer than the current record-holding year of 1987, which had 15.  Unsurprisingly, the number of tornado deaths in 2018 is also remarkably low at ten and could also turn out to be a record.

Now to my way of thinking, it would seem that those preaching the perils of supposed ‘climate change’ might have a bit of “splainin’ to do” when it comes to convincing the public how it was that a declining number of intense tornadoes was in fact caused by global warming.  But I’m sure they’ll come up with something.  In past years, everything from cold winters to warm summers have all been blamed on ‘climate change’ and I’m quite sure this latest phenomenon will prove to be no different.

‘Climate change’ has long been sort of a catch-all for the left. It was in 2015 that Susan Rice, you’ll remember her as being the one who busily traveled around lying about how it was that a video was solely responsible for the death of four Americans, including our ambassador, in Benghazi, suggested that ‘climate change’ was at least partially responsible for the war in Syria and Venezuelan Vice President Jorge Arreaza blamed government-imposed energy rations on ‘climate change’ as well.

And there seems to be absolutely nothing that cannot be blamed on ‘global warming’ nor the all-encompassing ‘climate change’.  It was back in 2017 that extremely cold temperatures in vineyards of western New York state were attributed to ‘climate change’, while in 2018 Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration argued that “climate change” is the driving force behind the massacre of thousands of predominantly Christian farmers at the hands of Fulani herdsmen.

I remain convinced that those denying climate ‘change’ is simply that, are creating scenarios that simply don’t exist.  You’ll remember that it was climate prophet, Al Gore, who once said there would come to be no ice at the poles, and now there is more ice than ever.  And it was just this past September that Al was telling a gathering of the faithful in San Francisco that watching the nightly news “is like a nature hike through the Book of Revelation” as severe climate events become a daily affair.

And not to be outdone, governor Jerry ‘Moonbeam’ Brown, a well-known ‘evangelist’ for climate change, recently blamed ‘climate change’ for California wildfires, adding that climate skeptics were responsible for the deaths of California residents.  He said, “Managing all the forests in everywhere we can does not stop climate change.”  And he added, “And those who deny that are definitely contributing to the tragedies that we’re now witnessing, and will continue to witness in the coming years.”

So if there are severe tornadoes, that is proof of man-made ‘climate change’. And if there is an absence of severe tornadoes, that too is proof of man-made ‘climate change’. If the Earth’s temperature rises, that is proof of man-made ‘climate change’ and if the temperature falls, that’s proof of man-made ‘climate change’. Everything is proof of man-made ‘climate change’. It has to be that way because all they have is a ‘theory’ that is highly suspect based entirely on ‘science’ that is completely bogus.

It’s for very obvious reasons, I think, that this religious orthodoxy that is the belief in ‘climate change’ will never acknowledge anything that can be seen as not fitting their accepted narrative.  In truth this movement is nothing more than an obvious scam to transfer wealth and a power grab scheme. Once again we hear nothing from this very same group about what is the worsening pollution, and on a massive scale, committed by China, India and other developing nations. Why do you suppose this is?

The Left, no matter where you find it, claims that America and, to a lesser degree, Europe owe the rest of the world for all the past environmental damage they have committed.  The Left has used moral relativism to parlay a feeling of guilt into a rather handsome profit.  Third world dictators are the recipient of a wealth transfer from which they then make massive donations to Democrats. Meanwhile the middle class is gutted while dictators and their Democrat enablers get very wealthy.

So just to be perfectly clear here, the sky is most certainly not falling.  However, I do not disagree that we have ‘climate change’ taking place.  But with that said, I would argue that the climate, by changing, is only doing that which it has been doing ever since this rock we call ‘Earth’ first came into being.  Man is far too insignificant to have any effect on the climate, one way or the other.  ‘Climate change’ is a natural occurring event that takes place in cycles.  To assume anything otherwise is to make it quite obvious just how gullible you really are.