It’s in Carl Bernstein, a guy who is now well into his 70s, that we have a guy who continues to expend a great deal of both time and energy in what is a continuing effort, on his part, to prove that, yes, he is someone whose opinion really does matter especially when what’s being discussed is the ongoing attempt to impeach President Trump.  But it is in his profession of ‘journalism,’ and I use the term loosely, that Bernstein is little more that the equivalent of a ‘one hit wonder.’  Yet he and, apparently, CNN still think that there are those who actually care about what he might have to say as it relates to our continuing impeachment circus.  But I hate to be the one to inform him, and they, but the honest truth is, no one really cares.

Anyway, it was just this past Monday, there at ‘fake news’ HQ, aka the Communist News Network (CNN), during a broadcast of the network’s “Newsroom With Brooke Baldwin,” that Bernstein, now employed by the network in the capacity of ‘political analyst,’ made the claim that he has apparently been in contact with what he described as being “quite a few” Republican Senators who are now genuinely concerned that President Trump might actually be serving the “interest of Russia and Vladimir Putin.”  Now if that is in fact the case then I’d have to say that Mr. Putin is not getting much in return after putting ‘his guy’ in the White House.  And dare I say that Vlad would have been much better served if Hitlery had been elected president.

And so it was in doing his best to sound like he actually knew what he was talking about that Mr. Bernstein said, “I don’t think there is any question, as we have seen throughout the Mueller investigation, and the idea that there is no collusion as the president claims, that is not necessarily the case. What we have seen through these impeachment investigations is what has so many Republican senators—and I talked to a few, quite a few and so have other reporters, they are deeply disturbed at what they have learned again about the president of the United States’ willingness to serve the interest of Russia and Vladimir Putin. Throughout the Ukrainian adventure, his dealings with Ukraine.”  And we’re supposed to take this boob seriously?  Fraid not!

And yet Bernstein continued, “Here is Ukraine, the only country that has been directly attacked aside from Georgia by Soviet forces or proxies, in this case, this is a real war in which 13,000 I believe? Thirteen thousand have died. The borders of Europe after World War II have been immutable until the Russian aggression. And when we have a president in the United States who not only has excused it but has sat by passively and gone along with what Putin has wanted him to do. So the larger question of Trump’s obeisance as we saw in Helsinki, the great mystery is why does he continue to do Vladimir Putin’s bidding?”  And you have to ask yourself, what planet is it that he is living on?  Because it most definitely isn’t the one the rest of are on!

Bernstein said, “As we saw most recently by the invasion of Turkey and Syria, shoving the Kurds into mortal danger and ending the role of the Kurds that have been so crucial to the security of what we were speaking to aspire in Syria.”  He added, “The question is, and senators are asking this, is this president witting, unwitting or half witting about his going along with and serving — let’s make no bones about it — he has served the interest of Vladimir Putin. Part of what this impeachment investigation is about, is we see now how he has continued to serve the interest of Putin in the most important hotspot in the world in which the Russians are involved, and we have a role to play that he seems unwilling to play.”  Has this guy not been paying attention?

Let’s be honest here, Bernstein’s ONLY moment in the sun, journalistically speaking, occurred almost 50 years ago and he has been desperate to recapture at least some of that lost glory ever since.  And far from being some masterful work of investigative ‘reporting’ back then Bernstein was simply fed the entire Watergate narrative by another FBI leaker by the name of Mark Feld.  Feld was then a FBI Deputy Director and should have been prosecuted just like the current ‘whistleblower’ who is less a ‘whistleblower’ that a disgruntled employee.  So if nothing else Mr. Bernstein would now appear to be a part of history repeating itself as the parallels between the two investigations involving government informants seem to more than a little similar.

But to be perfectly honest, I have no doubt that there are likely at least a few RINO senators who do believe that.  Folks with names like Romney, Sasse and Collins immediately come to mind.  Not because it’s the truth, but because they simply want President Trump gone, and the sooner the better.  After all, he’s seen as an outsider.  And worse, an outsider who threatens the status quo of deeply entrenched corruption which would appear to be rampant within our government and that involves those who inhabit ‘The Swamp.’  And that alone is seen as being sufficient for doing all that is seen as being necessary, including the manufacturing of all sorts of fictitious scenarios, to create the perception of wrongdoing on the part of the president.

Bernstein repeatedly made the claim that President Trump somehow “serves the interest of Putin” during his little diatribe but never says how or why.  And as expected the bimbo host of the show never challenges him to provide any proof.  Also, Bernstein makes no mention of how Barry ‘O’ did nothing when Russia annexed Crimea.  And he makes no mention of how Barry ‘O’ refused to arm the Ukrainians but sent blankets and MREs instead of even defensive weapons.  And he fails to mention that one of Barry’s first acts as president was to cancel the missile defense shield in Eastern Europe.  And he makes no mention of Barry’s “I can be more flexible after the election” hot mic comment.  And yet we’re supposed to be worried about Trump?

The Democrats and their many allies in the ‘fake news’ media, are doing their best to wear us all down by barraging the president, as well as those of us who support him, with all manner of accusations and lies, hoping to get us to the point where they hope we will simply surrender and say, “Ok, go ahead, impeach him!” just to get it over with.  But we must never give up and we must never surrender because there is simply too much at stake.  It’s all a sham!  There is simply no there, there.  This is about far more than bringing about the removal of a duly elected president.  It’s about sending a message, a very clear message to any future outsiders who might, at some point in future, dare to even consider wanting to be the next Donald Trump.


Bernstein 1

Carl Bernstein is really nothing more than another of ‘journalism’s’, one trick ponies.  He’s been living off the ‘Watergate’ days for decades, desperate to revive the glory days of what is a rather dubious past.  And it was over the weekend that he made what was yet another rather weak attempt when on Sunday, on CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” Bernstein said if President Trump asked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate 2020 presidential hopeful  and ex-vice president ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden’s son Hunter Biden, it echoes the days of “Watergate.”

Bernstein said, “Well, I think the first thing is to find out exactly what has happened here. And if the reporting of Shane Harris and The Wall Street Journal is accurate and it seems to be it clearly moves toward a grievance abuse of power by the president of the United States.”

He added, “I keep getting asked are there echoes of Watergate in this? And there are in the following ways, Watergate was an attempt by Richard Nixon to undermine the democratic electoral process in the United States our basis of democracy by trying through political espionage and sabotage to nominate through political dirty tricks and misinformation its weakest candidate, George McGovern instead of its strongest candidate, Senator Edmund Muskie who Nixon didn’t want to run against.”

Bernstein continued, “And something in the same thing seems to be happening here, where Biden who Trump and his people said they fear the most in terms of being an opponent has been an object of these perhaps dirty tricks and abuses of power.” And he said, “One thing Nixon never did was engage a foreign power to investigate a candidate running for office in the United States. It is a big offense if this is what happened, and it seems to be.”

How is it that anyone with an ounce of commonsense is still able to take this boob seriously, especially whenever the subject of the conversation is President Trump?  Come on folks, that old Carl is still able to convince anyone to put his raggedy old ass on television tells you all you really need to know about the current state of our supposed ‘news’ media, but then we are talking about the Communist News Network, CNN, also known as ‘fake news’ headquarters.  And what is it that President Trump could do that this leftist dolt would not see as an echoing of Watergate.

But I do think that most intelligent people are able to recognize that there is a very sizable difference between Watergate and asking the government of the country where the crime was actually committed, to investigate the crime so the perpetrators can then be held criminally liable for what they have done.  This boob Bernstein is like a 75-year-old ex-high school football star who caught the winning touchdown pass back in the 1964 homecoming game and never went on to do much of anything else.  And today, he’s still talking about it and hoping someone, anyone, will listen.

Like I said, Bernstein is desperate for a return to his ‘glory’ days and therefore sees examples of mythical political wrongdoing everywhere that he can then uncover allowing him to regain his former stature.  Poor old Carl, still trying to be relevant. He’s never recovered from having to play second fiddle to Woodward, even in the movie they cast Robert Redford as Woodward, and Dustin Hoffman as Bernstein.  That’s how the world sees them, Woodward as Sundance, and Bernstein as Tootsie.  Must be hard on the old ego for him to be nothing more than the perennial sidekick.

Democrats always falsely accuse Republicans of doing exactly what it is that they themselves are doing, or have done.  Crooked Hitlery colluded with almost everyone except the American people in her failed presidential run.  ‘Creepy Joe’ used pressure to get Ukraine to drop a probe into activities of his son, Hunter . The only stories with ‘Echoes of Watergate’ in the last 5 years were Hitlery’s emails, which she got rid of in a Nixonian effort recollecting the 18 minutes of missing audiotape and O-Bummer heading up a spy operation on an opposing party’s presidential candidate.

How is what the president did is in any way, shape, or form like Watergate?  Did someone break into someone’s office and steal info?  Did the President then try to cover that activity up?  NO!  What actually undermines our Democratic electoral process is letting criminals like ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden, O-Bummer, both the Clintons and every other Democrat POS get away with committing actual crimes that they then try to project onto to those whose only ‘crime’ is that they happen to be your political opponents.  This is how the Democrats have operated for decades.

Russia-Gate was said to be worse than Watergate, then Comey-Gate was worse than Watergate, Trump Tower Gate was worse than Watergate, and now Ukraine Gate is said to be worse than Watergate. Bernstein is so stupid you’d think he would tout Watergate was the worst ever, since that’s his stupid, claim to fame. He is so dense, he doesn’t even get how he is diminishing his own story.  When you’re a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. When you’re Carl Bernstein, apparently everything looks like Watergate unless the players involved are, of course, Democrats.

Fine, Nixon was a Republican and was caught doing something marginally scandalous 40 some years ago. The current batch Democrat lawbreakers are guilty of doing far worse and yet there’s no outrage from boobs like Carl.  It’s because they’ve merely created systems whereby they can protect one another so that none of them are ever held to account.  Nixon’s crime was in trying to see what opposition who’d stolen an election from him, was up to.  I would argue that that pales in comparison when placed up against what we’ve seen coming from the likes of Barry, Hitlery and Joe.

The level of insanity that we now see coming from those on the left, like Carl, has gone way beyond anything that we saw during Nixon’s presidency.  And it’s all driven by their hatred of a man whose only ‘crime’ is the fact that he won an election.  Well, it isn’t only that he won, it’s that he was able defeat, and in rather humiliating fashion, she who the Democrats were doing their best to sell as being the single most qualified individual EVER to run for the office she was seeking.  And along comes this outsider, this complete political novice who succeeded in sending her packing.