Map 1

Ok, so it has now been 490 days since our last presidential election and yet we find Hitlery still bitterly angry, still acutely hateful, and still exceedingly vengeful as evidenced by her recently lashing out at those red-state Americans over her self-inflicted and humiliating epic election loss for the ages where America totally and completely rejected her, and chose, instead, to embrace a fed up businessman with a truckload of moxie and zero political IOU’s.  It’s all become so completely bizarre.

I’m sure most have heard by now how it was that Hitlery gave a little talk over in India this past weekend, during which she made some rather hateful accusations regarding those who dared to vote for Donald Trump.  She claimed that less sophisticated and diverse red state voters were drawn to Trump’s anti-immigrant “looking backwards” realty TV campaign. She said, “You know, if people were looking for the reality TV campaign, maybe I should have given them more entrainment.”

She went on to say, “You know, I’m the mother who says eat your spinach so you grow up strong and somebody else is saying eat all the fast food and ice cream you can possibly stick in your mouth. And all of a sudden I’m thinking wait a minute, maybe I’m running a campaign like all the other campaigns I have been a part of and he is doing something entirely different, which is this reality TV campaign. Fascinating and it’s something that will come to a democracy near you at some point.”

And it was from there that Hitlery continued with her sophomoric assault on those folks who chose Trump over her, saying, “And voters have to be prepared to say, ‘OK that was entertaining. Wow, couldn’t take my eyes off him, but what is he really going to do and what has he ever done that convinces me he could actually accomplish any of it?’ So it’s going to require a lot more—a much more sophisticated analysis by voters if this trend goes from our 2016 campaign.”

She continued, “If you remember, Trump started his campaign attacking immigrants because he knew that in many parts of the country—and let me just hasten to add, in many parts of the country where there aren’t many immigrants—he was able to scapegoat immigrants. If you have problems like you are not happy with your job, you probably don’t think you have gotten enough advancement, you working for a woman now and you don’t like it—whatever the reason was, he stirred that up.”

And she went on to say, “And anti-immigrant feeling became so virulent thanks to his rhetoric that it was a big motivator in a lot of the votes in certain parts of the country.”  She added, “If you look at the map of the United States, there is all that red in the middle where Trump won. I won in the coasts, I won in Illinois, in Minnesota, places like that. But what the map doesn’t show you is that I won the places that represent two thirds of America’s gross domestic product.”

She said, “So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward, and his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know you didn’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian American succeeding more than you are. Whatever your problem is, I’m going to solve it.”  Actually she actually won places that are increasing radically leftwing and anti-America.

I can’t help but wonder how it is that Hitlery thinks such behavior will in any way convince those who voted for President Trump that they somehow made a mistake by doing so.  If nothing else, it should convince them that they made exactly the right decision.  And yet she insists upon going out of her way to bad-mouth those American citizens whose only ‘fault’ is that they were simply too smart to fall for her shtick.  And her claims ring increasingly hollow with each new President Trump success.

And I find it rather odd that the left, including Hitlery, can constantly accuse President Trump of decreasing America’s standing in the world when it was their hero Barry ‘O’ who was exceptionally adept at doing that very thing.  And these are the very same people who are constantly saying divisive and hateful things about those who disagree with them and about our country, over and over again, day in and day out, with those in our state-controlled media only too happy to repeat them.

The lady is nuts, there’s simply no other way to put it.  The main political opposition to blacks throughout the history of America has always been the Democrat Party.  And people, especially blacks, should be ashamed to belong to such a corrupt, divisive and and blatantly dishonest political party.  Who exactly would join a resurgent Nazi Party in Germany today, even if it claimed to be reformed?  And are people in India actually naive enough to believe Hitlery’s version of events regarding the 2016 election?

I’d like to ask her exactly what rights we conservatives are seeking to take away from black Americans.  It was a Republican who initially freed the slaves and today it’s another Republican who doing his best get them off the modern day plantation by creating REAL jobs for them.  Even with the Obummer as president unemployment for blacks skyrocketed.  Republicans want to see everyone succeed, whereas Democrats seek to keep as many people as possible, especially blacks, addicted to government.

What Hitlery continues to be unable to come to grips with are the many reasons why it was that she was not elected and the fact that none of those reason had anything to do with those Americans whom she seems to have such disdain for.  Unless, of course, you consider the fact that they were much better able than she at recognizing the fact, despite the many claims from those on her side, that she was nowhere near being the most qualified candidate ever to run for president.  Because instead she:

(1) is a compulsive liar who even lied to the families of those who lost loved ones at Benghazi knowing that she did nothing to rescue them.

(2) was under threat of indictment (and should have been indicted) for serious violations of federal law involving mishandling of Top Secret classified information.

(3) essentially rigged the Democrat primaries so only she could get nominated.

(4) was responsible the most ineptly run campaign in political history, thinking all she had to do was show up and she would be elected.

(5) offered no vision for the country and no new policies promising only to continue the failed policies of Barry ‘O’.

(6) claimed to be a champion for women but her only accomplishment was to successfully defend a guilty rapist and attack the character of women who accused her pervert husband of sexual harassment.

(7) never accepts responsibility for any mistakes,

(8) insulted, and continues to insult, the voting public with baseless slurs.

(9) is a corrupt, arrogant, condescending person who is more interested in power than in helping people.

Hitlery and her fellow Democrats love to tout how she won the ‘popular vote.’  But if you were to take away the welfare vote, I’m sure we would see that candidate Trump would have easily won nearly every state.  And then, of course, there are those sanctuary areas where illegals are free to do absolutely anything, even vote.  Even her blue states are mostly red.  And let’s not forget that it’s those red areas that Hitlery seems to hate so much that are where most of the producers reside.

It’s pretty clear how Hitlery feels about those Americans who live in the red states they’re “DEPLORABLE.”  And yet despite being handed the Democrat primary, handed all manner of free press coverage by the state-controlled media, being given a pass by both the FBI and the DOJ for her mishandling of classified documents, despite being HANDED EVERYTHING she still managed to lose an election that was supposed to be but a mere formality.  And that she lost is no one’s fault but her own.


Hitlery 7

So it is then on this the first anniversary, give or take a day or two, of her second failed attempt at becoming President of the United States, I thought it would be rather fitting to review just a few of the many reasons for why she feels that it is not her who we find sitting in the Oval Office one year later, but instead we find Donald J. Trump.  Since losing the 2016 presidential election, Hitlery’s blame list for her loss has continued to grow and, to date, includes at least 27 sources responsible for her defeat.  And it is nowhere on this list that will you find her name.

Since trying to list all of her excuses here would consume the better part of my day and would likely fill up a dozen or more pages, I’ve decided to simply hit the ‘highlights’ regarding the list of people, groups, ideologies – and even those who thought she would win – that Hitlery blames for her failure to be elected president one year ago. The list that I’ll be working from was compiled by various media outlets, including the UK Daily Mail, the BBC, the Daily Wire and Breitbart News.  So what follows here is essentially a partial list of her many excuses:

James Comey – It was on the ‘Today’ show back on September 13 — her first interview since losing to Trump, that Hitlery said, “I was just dumbfounded.”  She went on to say, “I thought, what is he doing?  The investigation is closed. I knew there was no new information.  And then it became clear. This was not necessary.” And she added, “Absent that, I believe, and I think the evidence shows, I would have won.”

The FBI –  It was in her book, ‘What Happened’, that Hitlery wrote, “The FBI wasn’t the Federal Bureau of Ifs or Innuendoes.  Its job was to find out the facts.”  (Sidenote: I guess it’s only the ‘Bureau of Ifs’ when it’s about President Trump or some other Republican.)

Vlad Putin – Hitlery told USA Today, “There’s no doubt in my mind that Putin wanted me to lose and wanted Trump to win.”  And it was in December that the New York Times obtained audio that revealed Hitlery had said to donors: “Putin publicly blamed me for the outpouring of outrage by his own people, and that is the direct line between what he said back then and what he did in this election.”

The Russians – Hitlery has publicly blamed the Russians on numerous occasions, including the Codecon convention in May when she said that “1,000 Russian agents” had filled Facebook with “fake news.”  Hitlery also told NPR, “My path toward November was being disrupted with Russians.”

WikiLeaks – And it was in September that Hiltery told NPR, “Unfortunately, the Comey letter, aided to great measure by the Russian WikiLeaks, raised all those doubts again.”  And in her book ‘What Happened’, Hitlery said of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: “In my view, Assange is a hypocrite who deserves to be held accountable for his actions.”

Low information voters – It was also at the CodeCon convention that Hitlery said, “You put yourself in the position of a low information voter, and all of a sudden your Facebook feed, your Twitter account is saying, ‘Oh my gosh, Hillary Clinton is running a child trafficking operation in Washington with John Podesta.’”  I must admit that this excuse was more than a bit perplexing to me, especially when you stop and consider the fact that were it not for low information voters no Democrat would win ANY election, EVER.  Democrats prey on low information voters.

The Electoral College – And it was to Vox that Hitlery said, “We have an electoral college problem,” adding that she has called for its abolishment since 2000.

The Conservative media (aka the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy?) – Hitlery said that her campaign was hampered by the “dedicated propaganda channels” on the right.  She said, “That’s what I call Fox News.”  And she said, “It has outlets like Breitbart and crazy Infowars and things like that.”  Hitlery went on to say, “They have a mission.” And added, “They use the rights given to them under the First Amendment to advocate a set of policies that are in their interests, their commercial, corporate, religious interests.”

Anti-American Forces – And it was again at CodeCon that Hitlery said, “I think it’s important that we learn the real lessons from this last campaign because the forces that we are up against are not just interested in influencing our elections and our politics, they’re going after our economy, and they’re going after our unity as a nation.”

Everyone who predicted she would win – And it was also at the CodeCon convention that Hitlery said, “I was the victim of a very broad assumption that I was going to win.’

Polls – And it was again at CodeCon that she said, “I think polling is going to have to undergo some revisions in how they actually measure people.’

Green Party candidate Jill Stein – It was in her book that Hitlery wrote, “In each state, there were more than enough Stein voters to swing the result, just like Ralph Nader did in Florida and New Hampshire in 2000.”  And she said, “The best assessments as of right now are that the polling was not that inaccurate, but it was predominantly national polling and I won nationally.”

Ex-President Barry Obummer – And it was also in her book that Hitlery wrote, “No non-incumbent Democrat had run successfully to succeed another two-termer since Vice President Martin Van Buren won in 1836.”

White Women – Hitlery told Vox, “I believe absent Comey, I might’ve picked up one or two points among white women.”

Bernie Sanders – Hitlery wrote in her book, “His attacks caused lasting damage, making it harder to unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign.”  And she said, “I don’t know if that bothered Bernie or not.”

Misogyny or Sexism – It was the Crappy News Network’s Christine Amanpour at something called the ‘Women for Women International’ event in New York back in May who asked Hitlery if misogyny was to blame.  To which Hitlery responded by saying, “Yes, I do think it played a role.”  Hitlery went on to say, “I never said I was a perfect candidate, and I certainly have never said I ran perfect campaigns, but I don’t know who is or did.”  And she added, “And at some point it sort of bleeds into misogyny.”

Campaign Finance – And again it was while at CodeCon that Hitlery said, “You had Citizens United come to its full fruition.”  And she would go on to say, “So unaccountable money flowing in against me, against other Democrats, in a way that we hadn’t seen and then attached to this weaponized information war.”  So says the candidate on whose behalf roughly $2 Billion was spent to get her elected, and who was also able to raise over twice as much money as was her opponent.

The Media – Hitlery wrote in her book, “American journalists who eagerly and uncritically repeated whatever WikiLeaks dished out during the campaign could learn from the responsible way the French press handled the hack of Macron.”

Women who didn’t vote – And it is again in her book that Hitlery recounts a moment when a mother dragged her daughter by the arm to apologize for not voting.  She wrote, “I wanted to stare right in her eyes and say, ‘You didn’t vote?  How could you not vote?! You abdicated your responsibility as a citizen at the worst possible time!  And now you want me to make you feel better?’”  And in writing in her book about the protest march against President Trump that took place after his election, Hitlery wrote, “I couldn’t help but ask where those feelings of solidarity, outrage, and passion had been during the election,”

White Voters – And Hitlery told Vox, “White voters have been fleeing the Democratic party ever since Lyndon Johnson predicted they would.”  This too is a rather odd complaint for her to make in that there has been a very dedicated campaign underway on the part of the Democrat Party to bill itself as being the party of the non-whites.  The party has, for some time now, demonstrated a less than caring attitude when it comes to white Americans, almost as if it wishes to purge itself of white voters.  So should they really be blamed for not voting for a Democrat candidate?

So there you have it, an abbreviated list regarding the many excuses used thus far by she who is the most self-obsessed, egotistical, arrogant, white-loathing, man-hating despicable candidate, man or woman, to have ever run for the high office of President of the Unite States.  But that’s not to say that she won’t keep trying to remain, to one degree or another, politically relevant, or will try to insert herself into anything that will bring her into the limelight to greatest extent possible.  But I’m quite sure there will come a time when even Democrats tire of her.

Hitlery seems to take great pleasure in continuing to harp on the fact that she got more votes in the general election and therefore wants the Electoral College to be abolished.  Of course the only places she garnered the most votes were in those areas where there is an unusually high concentration of liberal parasites.  If she were to be shown a county-by-county electoral map she would see exactly just how unpopular she was in the VAST majority of the country.  Luckily for us, the framers of the Constitution foresaw just such a need and baked it into the Constitution.

And you know, you can measure a person very well by the way they are able to handle failure or defeat.  Hitlery has proven not only that she’s not fit for public office, but that she is not even worthy to walk among the people of the United States.  She has set a very poor example for young women to follow and I’m afraid she’s done the impossible, lowered the standard of behavior for politicians.  I thought Obummer dug that ditch as deep as someone could without the whole thing collapsing.  It would seem that while Obummer used a shovel while Hitlery used a backhoe.

Finally I would like to offer to Hitlery a little piece of friendly advice.  Please, for your own sake stop trying to convince us why you think you lost the election.  You’re only embarrassing yourself by reminding us of how it was that “the smartest woman in the world” was unable to defeat he who many of your supporters called an “orange-faced buffoon.”  And if you truly do need a reason for why you lost the election before finally being able to move on with your life, simply stand in front of the nearest mirror and slowly repeat, “It’s my fault, I ran a crappy campaign.”


Hitlery 19

Has there ever been anyone who, after running for president and losing, continued to harp on that fact for 11 months, and counting, especially after experiencing what many have described as being the most humiliating defeat in modern political history?  Personally, if it were me I would go into a self-imposed exile instead of spending all of my time coming up with increasing idiotic excuses for why I lost?  Nor would I persist in demonstrating my refusal to accept defeat by doing nothing more than to carryon about what a terrible president the guy who defeated me has turned out to be.  I mean, why would anyone, especially someone who has been involved in politics for over 30 years want to keep reminding people about how it is that she managed to get beat by someone who had never before run for public office?  It seems to me that you’d want people to forget.

And so here we are, nearly a full year after the last presidential election, and still Hitlery is unable to accept the fact that she was actually defeated by Donald Trump.  She remains stubbornly unable move behind the fact that she lost to someone who was a total newcomer to the world of politics, and who no one thought had a chance of winning.  And it goes beyond simply accepting defeat.  She’s now resorted to making all manner of rather absurd accusations against the man responsible for her defeat.  Just this past Monday, at the University of California-Davis, failed Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery went so far as to describe President Trump as being nothing short of being “insidious and subversive to democracy.”  And I thought, what a coincidence!  “Insidious and subversive” are exactly how I’ve described the threat posed by Hitlery, and the left, to our Republic.

Hitlery said, “There is no such thing as an alternative fact. And despite the best efforts by some to wage war on truth, reason, and evidence we cannot let that happen.”  She continued by saying , “When leaders deny things we can see with our own eyes like the size of a crowd of an inauguration it is just frustrating to us that pride ourselves on living in a fact-based universe, it is insidious and subversive to democracy. And when they refuse to accept evidence on everything from the settled science of climate change, to what is actually being proposed — because all you have to do is read it — in their so-called tax reform it has real-world consequences that will only get worse.”  How about when a known sexual predator is accused of rape or inappropriate sexual advances involving a young woman, and all Hitlery does is to trash the women involved, is that not an “alternative fact?”

Anyway, Hitlery went on to say, “Just last week the Trump administration announced a new rule that would allow any employer or insurance company to refuse to cover contraception if they have a religious or moral objection. Now that just doesn’t undermine every woman’s right to make her own health decisions it flies in the face of medicine, science, and facts. Thanks to decades of hard work and investment in prevention American is now at a thirty year low of unintended pregnancy, a forty year low for teen pregnancy and the lowest abortion rate since Roe v Wade was decided. And no matter your political party or ideology that has something to do with access to birth control.”  She acts as if all forms of contraception were have suddenly become banned in the U.S.  She’s so transparently dishonest.  We know she’s lying as soon as she opens her mouth.

Hitlery once said something about the pointlessness of living in the past, that doing so prevented one from seeing opportunities in the present yet she has done nothing but relive the election for the past 11 months.  Oh well, I suppose if it keeps her stuck in what is nothing more than what has become a perpetual pity party it’s all the better for us.  But you have to think that she comes across as looking kind of desperate to most in the general public.  Americans, whatever their political leanings, tend to dislike those engaged in self-pity.  And in so doing, Hitlery continues to hand more and more ammunition to her opposition, which is fine with me.  I’ve always thought it odd how the left continues to claim that she’s so smart and experienced when it’s every time she that opens her mouth she proves that it’s just the complete opposite that’s true.  She lost because she ran a horrible campaign.

And I gotta tell you, any woman who actually chose to believe any of the garbage that Hitlery spewed during the last campaign, or continues to buy any of the excuses she has come up with in her effort to explain her ‘unexpected’ loss, I would argue, can be lumped together as little more than a bunch of uneducated and exceptionally gullible females.  Every woman has the right to access birth control, however, people who do not believe in it, should not have to be forced into paying for it.  If birth control is truly something women want, then they can add it into their budget, and purchase it.  It’s not that expensive.  And for those who can’t afford a few dollars for birth control, then perhaps they should re-think the whole notion of recreational sex and perhaps practice a little self-control/discipline.  Why should I be forced into subsidizing anyone’s desire to have sex?

And lastly I must admit that deep down inside that I hope Hitlery keeps on with her self-destructive, albeit rather pointless, desire to run down our president.  Please Hitlery, I beg you, keep on pushing his buttons.  I know you think you’re safe and remain confident that he won’t bother coming after you, even after promising to do so if elected.  But if the truth be told, once you hit his bad side there’s going to be no turning back, regardless of what dirt you think you may have on him.  And then he’ll crush you, and ‘Slick Willy’, like the bugs you are.  Because while he may not be the richest guy on the planet, he’s got more than you do, despite all your money-making little schemes.  So please keep it up, Hitlery, because I just bought me a big ol’ case of popcorn, a case of beer, and have the DVR all set to go so I can watch, and then re-watch, the ‘Hitlery Goes to Prison’ show.



So the presidential election was held last November 8, and here we are rapidly approaching the 4th of July weekend and still we’re hearing excuses as to why she who was supposed to have won the election quite handily, actually ended up losing.  And it’s just when you thought you had heard every conceivable excuse imaginable, that one of the geniuses over at MS’LSD’ has come up with one that you would never have come up with on your own.  At least, speaking for myself, it’s never one that would have popped into my head, ever.  It was one of the ‘contributors’ at MS’LSD’, some loon by the name of Wendy Sherman, who said she believes that Hitlery may have lost the election because it was simply too hard for America to elect the first female president directly after electing the first black president.  But then being a vile, filthy, disgusting, lying, cheating, racist, rape enabling criminal married to a habitual rapist probably didn’t help her all that much either.

Sherman was on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival discussing modern political technology when she segued into the bizarre comment.  She said, “President Obama’s major mode of communication was the traditional one.”  And then she went on to say, “Big speeches, some of which were powerful and brilliant.”  She added, “And I hesitate to say, but I think it’s critical, looking out at our audience, looking out at most of us — that there is no doubt that we just had eight years of an African American president is not a factor in all that we are experiencing today.”  And she said, “When we make social change, when we make a decision to do something we have never done before, we then take two steps backward, at least. And I believe in my bones…that it was pretty hard to elect a woman after we elected the first African America president.”  Wow, that’s quite a theory she’s come up with.  Have you ever noticed how it’s the left that’s so preoccupied with gender and race?

And of course it’s those who are Hitlery’s more devoted followers who continue to make the claim that the Benghazi, email server, and Seth Rich ‘scandals’ were long ago thoroughly debunked.  And while maybe that’s the case for folks like Ms. Sherman, the truth is that none of those issues have been debunked.  They are, especially Seth Rich, still very much under investigation, including Benghazi!  Look, Hitlery lost because she had too many negatives, no positives, no solutions and no ideas.  These sad people simply refuse to admit that they had the worst possible candidate in modern electoral history.  If they had run almost anyone else they likely would have won.  It wasn’t the Russians or the deplorables, it was Hitlery.  She had no message, she is a lying crook with all the charisma of a USMC DI.  She allowed the consulate in Benghazi to be overrun and watched as four Americans, including our ambassador, died and yet she thought we still trusted her.

The Left in America simply can’t help themselves when it comes to identity politics. They refuse to look at results.  They refuse to see that Obummer oversaw a huge rise in Food Stamp participation, a doubling of our national debt, the lowest labor participation rate in over 40 years, wages that didn’t rise during his eight years, triple digit percentage increases in insurance premiums and deductibles, an open border policy that cost American lives, kow-towing to Moslem terrorists, apologizing for American exceptionalism, prioritizing non-citizens over citizens especially veterans and on and on.  The Left refuses to look at Obummer results and see failure so instead they have to blame race.  What many voters saw and understood was that Hitlery had every intention of continuing the failed policies that Obummer had put in place.  Her most important job, had she been elected, would be to put that final nail in the coffin of our Constitutional Republic.  Thankfully, she lost.

But I must admit that in one sense Ms. Sherman could be onto something.  A great many Americans did not like ex-president Obummer, but it wasn’t because of his race, it was because of his rabid ideology and the fact that he was blatantly anti-America, which he made quite clear even before he was elected by stating that if elected his intent was to “fundamentally transform” America.  And it was after watching Barry achieve some level of success in doing just that, that people chose to vote for President Trump.  And they did so not because of Hitlery’s gender or Barry’s race, what it came down to is the fact that there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between how both Hitlery and Barry viewed America.  Over the years it has become painfully obvious that neither are all that fond of America, at least as how it was conceived by ‘The Founders’.  So in a sense the electing of Barry may very well have had an adverse impact on the willingness of Americans to elect Hitlery.

And on a final note, I have long wished that those on our side, the Republican side, would play the political game a bit more like the Democrats play it.  And now that we have someone who does it’s become very apparent that the Democrats, their many minions in the state-controlled media, as well as more than a few of our wimpy RINOs, can’t quite handle it.  After all, they’re much more accustomed to watching our Republicans behave rather meekly as they simply sit there and take whatever it is that’s hurled at them with little or no response.  But now the Democrats find themselves in the position of being confronted by someone who does not just sit there and take it, he fights back.  And they don’t seem to be the least bit happy about it!  So as the president continues to fight back, we get to watch, with some level of enjoyment, as he continues to make liberal heads explode.  This is why many voted for him and why many will always support him.


Hitlery 12

And so it would seem that there is now a growing number of Democrats who are becoming more than a bit weary of Hitlery as their patience continues to wear a little thin when it comes to her litany of excuses for why she was unable to defeat a candidate that was supposed to be so easily dispatched.  And more than a few are becoming increasingly vocal when it comes to expressing their desire for her to step out of the limelight.  The consensus among former Hitlery aides, former Obummer aides, and Democrat strategists is that Hitlery’s remarks blaming the Democratic National Committee and others for her election loss are hurting both her image and the image of the Democrat Party.  When it comes to the image of the Democrat Party, Hitlery is far from the only one doing damage.  It was one longtime aide who recently said, “She’s apparently still really, really angry.  I mean, we all are. The election was stolen from her, and that’s how she feels.”  And this same aide went on to say, “But to go out there publicly again and again and talk about it?  And then blame the DNC? It’s not helpful to Democrats. It’s not helpful to the country, and I don’t think it’s helpful to her.”

Remember how it was back during the campaign when the Democrats and all those in the state-controlled media, were doing their damnedest to convince us all how it was that Hitlery was the greatest thing since sliced bread?  Well it would seem that the bread may have become more than just a bit moldy.  So word is that there are several Democrats who are reportedly encouraging the old girl to step out of the limelight. Which is ironic, really, since Americans representing 306 electoral votes, asked her to do just that last November.  They don’t catch on very quickly do they?  Apparently, they are only now coming to view Hitlery’s remarks blaming the DNC and others for her loss in November as damaging the image of the Democrat Party.  Actually, her excuses notwithstanding, she simply didn’t have enough loyalists able to steal it for her, like Obummer did, twice. That’s not the same thing as having the election stolen from her.  She just couldn’t get enough support to steal it from us, like her comrade. Hence, the absolute SHOCK she went through when she didn’t win. She truly thought she had it in the bag.  And that kind of confidence over something so important only comes from ‘knowing’ you’ll win, because you cheated.

Hitlery has now gone on-the-record blaming everyone from former FBI Director James Comey, to the Russians, the media, her primary and general election opponents, and even sexism for her election loss.  Some aides and strategists think the time has now come for her to retreat into the shadows and allow new ‘leaders’ in the party to step forward and into the spotlight.  In fact, it was a former Obummer aide who said, “If she is trying to come across as the leader of the angry movement of what happened in 2016, then she’s achieving it.”  And this same aide went on to say, “But part of the problem she had was she didn’t have a vision for the Democratic Party, and she needs to now take a break and let others come to the forefront.”  Despite those in the party calling on her to leave the public eye, Hitlery’s aides and advisers say she will likely remain in firmly in the public eye discussing the 2016 election as a way to promote her new book which will be released this fall.  Democrat strategist Jamal Simmons says that she should talk more about where she went wrong in the election as opposed to blaming others for her elections.  He said, “It would be nice to hear a little more about the things she did wrong, which I believe mattered more than what she has discussed.”

The time has long since passed for when both Hitlery and the Democrat Party should have been able to come to grips with the fact that the election was in no way stolen from them.  In truth I think the argument can be made that Hitlery and the party simply threw away any chance they had to win, by stubbornly choosing to allow psycho-sexual perverts into little girl’s bathrooms, the committing of numerous felonies that Hitlery was not charged with due to Lynch’s corruption, the secretly handing over of 400 Billion in cash to Iran, and enthusiastic embracing of the BLM thugs.  And all anyone had to do was to watch the rallies.  Trump would talk about defending our borders, the economy, job creating, and stopping ISIS for over an hour and 30 minutes, 3 states a day, 6 days a week.  Hitlery would have her half an hour speeches about nothing but what Trump said, how dare Trump say that, and can you believe what Trump said.  Nothing about policy, little about her plan to keep Americans safe, and no mention of ISIS or job creating.  And the only way she could come close to matching Trump’s rallies was to enlist her celebrity friends.  She was nothing but a political donor puppet.

When Obummer won the first time around, while I certainly didn’t like it, at the same time that I was neither surprised or shocked, and for any number of reasons, not the least of which was the fact that we had been stupid enough to nominate John McCain as our candidate.  But when Obummer won the second time I did feel a sickness in my stomach because after having watched him for the four years prior as he proved himself time and again to be nothing short of a disaster, I had hoped the American people would have had enough sense not to re-elect him.  But I was wrong.  Granted, once again we Republicans had managed to saddle ourselves with a less than stellar candidate in Mitt Romney, but even with that said, had Romney been a bit more aggressive, perhaps, dare I say, a bit more like Trump, I think he just might have been able to win.  And while I was less than thrilled by the outcome, I knew I had no option but to accept it.  And I certainly didn’t advocate for my favored candidate to form some sort of “resistance”, or for people to start taking to the streets calling for Obummer’s impeachment, despite the fact that it was easy to argue the point that he certainly deserved it.

In all of my 47 years as a registered voter I have never once seen the wisdom in voting for a Democrat and I feel quite confident in saying that I never will.  But to those who chose to come across the aisle and vote in support of America, I say thank you.  But then, like they say, even a crazy person will run out of a burning building.  And to those Democrats who had the courage to vote for candidate Trump, I say thank you for having principles and convictions to see through all of the garbage.  And to be able to recognize the fact that despite all their talk of tolerance and of being accepting and inclusive, Democrats are neither tolerant nor accepting.  They preach tolerance only of those things which they seek to force upon the rest of us and accept no differing opinion.  So this attempt to now try to distance themselves from Hitlery makes clear how it is that the Democrat Party has learned nothing from the stunning loss experienced by their candidate, because their problem goes much deeper than Hitlery.  And they shouldn’t count her leaving the spotlight until she’s ready to leave the spotlight.  And the Democrats have no one to blame but themselves, they alone are responsible for creating this political Frankenstein.


Hitlery 10

What is it, exactly, about Democrats from Al Gore to John Kerry-Heinz to Hitlery, that has them being so completely unable to comprehend why the American people simply did not want any of them as their president?  And then when after they have lost, the reason for that loss can ONLY be because their opponent was somehow able to cheat.  Now we all know that when it comes to political chicanery no one, and I mean no one, can hold a candle to the Democrats.  From the dead showing up and being allowed to vote, to ballots being found in the trunks of voting officials’ cars, over the years we have seen just about everything.

Which brings me to an increasingly bitter Hitlery who recently added yet another culprit to her apparently endless list of people and/or groups who she views as being responsible for her rather stunning 2016 election defeat.  That being, of course, the Democratic National Committee.  The failed presidential candidate, in a discussion Wednesday at the Code Conference in California, said that when she won the Democrat nomination she “inherited nothing” from the DNC.  She said, “I mean it was bankrupt, it was on the verge of insolvency, its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong. I had to inject money into it.”

She then went on to compare it to the Republican National Committee operation, which under then-RNC Chair Reince Priebus had bumped up its tech operation and had a multi-million dollar war chest behind it.  Hitlery went on to say, “So Trump becomes the nominee and he is basically handed this tried and true, effective foundation.”  Blaming the DNC marks an extension of the blame game in which Hitlery’s team engaged since within 24 hours of losing to President Trump in November.  And after all her railing against candidate Trump’s reluctance to accept the election outcome, who is it that has stubbornly refused to

Hitlery has repeatedly blamed FBI Director James Comey’s handling of the investigation into her private email server, as well as an alleged wide-ranging Russian-led conspiracy against her.  She has also blamed misogyny for her loss, as well as “voter suppression” in Wisconsin.  It was in a recent New York Magazine interview that Hitlery said, “I would have won had I not been subjected to the unprecedented attacks by [former FBI Director James] Comey and the Russians, aided and abetted by the suppression of the vote, particularly in Wisconsin.”  To say that she continues to live in denial would apparently be a gross understatement.

At the conference Wednesday, beyond the DNC, she repeated the Comey and Russia allegations, and also took an apparent swipe at voters — implying they weren’t interested in her “specific, costed plans” that allegedly were paid for.  She said, “I had this old-fashioned idea that it really mattered what I’d do as president.”  Well, it did really matter to many people what she’d do as president, that’s the primary reason she lost.  All we would have had, had Hitlery won, would have been a third Obama term, and millions of Americans understood that the country would never survive another four years that would likely resemble the last eight.

And when asked what her biggest mistake was in the campaign, she said it was her use of a private email server. However, she also accused what she called “the mainstream media” of covering her email scandal like Pearl Harbor and said that her email scandal was “a nothingburger.”  But she said it was exploited effectively and therefore she regrets doing it.  So she doesn’t regret the fact that our nation’s secrets were exposed to has now become, thanks to her, a rather lengthy list of enemies, only because it was able to be exploited during a political campaign.  That right there tells you all you need to know about Hitlery.

She also targeted what she referred as the ‘mainstream media’ for perhaps being too supportive, saying she was “a victim of the very broad assumption that I was going to win.”  Hitlery also blamed misogyny for her election defeat, saying of criticism of her: “At some point it bleeds into misogyny.”  She called it “maddening” that she is not able to get as angry publicly as male politicians.  One of the hosts seemed to notice Hitlery’s blame game, and remarked: “You seem as mad as ever.”  But Hitlery again could not bring herself to accept responsibility in any meaningful way, despite some of her clunky answers giving an insight into why she lost.

So I ask ask you, throughout the entire history of the United States, and in the entire history of world politics, has there ever been another person to go on and on about the myriad of reasons why they lost an election?  Especially seven months after the election?   It’s just all so pathetic, so Hitlery, and so very Democrat Party.  Accepting defeat with grace and dignity sure as Hell is not something that Democrat are able to do.  With each passing day with each new excuse and new claim of being a victim of “others”, she only serve to make a bigger ass of herself and looks even more pathetic. She is quite the piece of work. Thank God she lost.

And how is it that she can claim to have inherited “nothing”?  Really?  I guess that would be nothing except, you know, a nationwide (and often times, global) network of media companies and personalities, academics, A-list Hollywood and Music industry celebrities and other cultural movers and shakers promoting her 24/7, as well as ‘journalists’ meeting with her at quiet dinners against the ethics of their profession, as well as an Obama Administration lying to FISA courts to gain access to info on political opponents for political reasons.  I guess if you don’t count all if that then, yes, Hitlery did inherit absolutely nothing.

Is she also claiming that Bernie supporters weren’t organized and enthusiastic, that they weren’t actively campaigning for him or is that disclosure about DNC incompetence her way of admitting that the DNC was working against him and now she’s playing both sides?  Also, used “her own money?”  What did she think, that all those foreign plutocrats were just giving her money because they thought she was so, darned lovely?  No, those random chunks of cash were given to try to get her into power so they could use her to get whatever they wanted from the USA.  This woman has less introspective and self-awareness than a gnat.  My apologies to gnats.

So let’s recap the many reasons why Hitlery say she lost to Donald J. Trump:

1)  The DNC was broke.

2)  She wasn’t allowed to get mad.

3)  Her use of a private email server.

4)  The media talked about her server.

5)  The media supported her too much.

6)  Wisconsin requires an ID to vote.

7)  She got paid for speeches.

8)  Comey, Comey, Comey.

9)  Hacking of her server, which is new info.

10) Hacking of DNC by Russia, who were too dumb to use the info, so they called Kushner.

11) And the Russians…

Now she’s pointing her finger at the DNC itself, saying that they were near bankrupt and offered little if any help.  But isn’t this the same DNC that brazenly colluded with Hitlery’s campaign and the press?  The press which submitted stories that were either pro-Hitlery and/or anti-everyone else for proofing prior to being sent to press?  Isn’t this the same DNC that Debbie Wizzerman Shultz worked hand in hand with Hitlery to the detriment of Bernie Sanders?  Isn’t this the same DNC that was a well-tuned, well-oiled political machine throughout the eight years of Obummer?  Yet somehow it went from being a well-tuned and well-oiled machine to near bankruptcy?

Never has one person more responsible for her own defeat, been so reluctant to accept any blame and so quick to blame others for that defeat than Hitlery.  She had folks on the ground in traditionally Red states asking why they were there, and folks in traditionally Blue states asking where’s the help that we need?  Her campaign had no message for voters other than that they were bigots, racists, sexists, a homophobes, Islamaphobic, or a deplorable and that we just need to accept men dressing as women, women dressing as men and each in the other’s bathroom.  No wonder so many didn’t vote for her, no wonder at all.

Hitlery demonstrates every time she speaks about the election, that she has continued to learn nothing.  Did she get hacked?  Sure.  But she and the DNC are only crying foul over it because it was a hack against their party, her campaign.  Had it been the GOP and/or Trump who had been hacked I’m sure they’d be singing a very different tune.  Overseas forces and influences?  Well apparently it was okay when folks in Israel and select other middle-eastern countries helped Obama with calling Americans to get the vote out.  Sexism, misogyny, bigotry and whatever else.  We’ve heard it all before Hitlery, and we still don’t believe you.


Kerry 19

I gave up a long time ago thinking of our current secretary of state, John Kerry-Heinz, as being anything other than a complete moron.  And he did nothing but to confirm my opinion of him this past Monday when he made the pathetically imbecilic claim that there is “zero evidence” that refugee applicants who go through the ‘rigorous’ screening involved in the U.S. refugee admission program pose a greater security threat than members of any other group.  Does he actually believe the shit that comes out of his mouth?  If so, that makes him even more dangerous.

Of course, to whom it was that he was speaking at the time might have had some level of influence regarding his making such an outrageously false and ridiculously ignorant statement. Kerry-Heinz was speaking at the interfaith iftar (Ramadan fast-breaking meal) in Sterling, Va. Which just so happened to coincide with World Refugee Day, yes we really do have one of those.  Kerry-Heinz also warned that what he called “bigoted and hateful rhetoric” about Muslims helps those “who propagate the lie that America is at war with Islam.”  Which we know is pure bullshit!

And it was then that Kerry-Heinz appeared to swing for the fence when he said, “There is absolutely no evidence, my friends, zero evidence, that refugees who make it through this arduous process, pose any greater threat to our society than the members of any other group.”  And he went on to say, “And it is important for people to know that.”  Actually, what’s important for people to know, and to understand, is that the nonsense being spewed by Kerry-Heinz is really nothing more than pure political propaganda.  What people need to know is that he’s lying out his ass.

And in alluding to calls by some Republicans to bar Muslim refugee applicants, Kerry-Heinz continued to harp on what has become the favorite Democrat talking point, that blocking any group on the basis of religion, race or nationality went against Americans ideals.  He said, “Preventing any group from entering the United States solely because of their race, or because of their nationality, or because of a religious affiliation is directly contrary to the very ideals on which our country is based.”  What about the American ideal of self-preservation?

And then he went on to say, “We believe in individual rights, not collective guilt. And we believe in judging people based on what they do, not the circumstances of their birth or their choice of sacred texts.”  He said, “We need to remember that bigoted and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims plays right into the hands of the terrorist recruiters who propagate the lie – it plays into the hands of people who propagate the lie that America is at war with Islam, when in fact there is no country on earth where Muslims enjoy more freedom than in the United States of America.”

After Kerry-Heinz’s remarks there at the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) center, a member of the community and of the U.S. Army National Guard, Ali Khwaja, offered the Islamic call to prayer before the day’s fast was broken.  In his comments Kerry-Heinz did not address the issue, raised by some Republicans and the subject of proposed legislation, of prioritizing in refugee admissions minorities that have been specifically targeted by Islamic extremists in the Syria and Iraq conflicts – and which Kerry-Heinz himself has determined are the victims of genocide.

Also worth mentioning is the fact that as of this past Monday, the federal government had admitted 4,464 Syrian refugees so far this fiscal year, of whom just 17 (0.3 percent) were Christians, 10 (0.2 percent) were Yazidis, and one each were defined in  State Department Refugee Processing Center data as “no religion” and “other religion.”   The vast majority of the 4,464 – 4,385, or 98.2 percent – were Sunni Muslims and another 17 were Shi’ite Muslims and 33 were other Muslims.  Ok, so is this making any sense to anyone, because it makes little sense to me.

With regard to Kerry-Heinz’s idiotic comments about the relative threat posed by refugees, State Department spokesmoron John Kirby said last November that of 785,000 refugees from all countries admitted to the U.S. since 9/11, “only about a dozen have been arrested or removed from the United States due to terrorism concerns that existed prior to their resettlement in the United States.”  None of them were Syrian, he added.  This guy Kirby was joke when he was at the Pentagon and he’s still a joke. He’s the kind of guy who would lie to his own mother.  A real piece of work.

And a State Department factsheet from last December said that Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S. since the beginning of FY2011 had been able to do so “only after the most extensive level of security screening of any category of traveler to the United States. None have been arrested or removed on terrorism charges.”  But ABC News reported late last year that two Iraqi refugees resettled in Kentucky were later found to have al-Qaeda links.  So apparently this supposed ‘rigorous’ screening process has got more than a few holes in it.  Big surprise there.

And then in January, two Iraqi-born Palestinian refugees in the U.S. were indicted on terror-related charges.  Omar Faraj Saeed al-Hardan of Houston, Texas, was charged with attempting to provide material support to ISIS, procuring citizenship or naturalization unlawfully, and making false statements. He was admitted into the U.S. as a refugee in 2009.  And Aws Mohammed Younis Al-Jayab, of Sacramento, Calif.,was accused of traveling to Syria to fight alongside terrorist groups, and was also charged with lying to the government about his travels. He arrived in the U.S. as a refugee in 2012.

John Kerry-Heinz is the personification of the current idiocracy we chose to saddle ourselves with for the last seven years.  The blatant dishonesty exhibited by this group runs from the very top to the very bottom.  Of course refugees don’t pose a greater risk than other groups, because only because we don’t bother to properly vet them either. See, they are all an equal threat. Prepare for more Islamic terrorist attacks.  And don’t you just love how these leftists like Kerry-Heinz always speak in absolutes. “We are 100 percent confident.” “There is zero evidence.”

Yeah, zero evidence other than 1400 years of violence coming at the hands of those adhering to the fundamental teachings of a man, Muhammad, who there is much doubt about whether he actually existed, and his own life. Zero evidence other than the murders, rapes and riots caused in every other country that has opened their borders to these “refugees”. Zero evidence other than the fact that the Muslims themselves have stated they would put jihadists into the refugee population.  Am I missing anything here, John?

This man works for the same people who will not allow those “vetting” the refugees to even look at social media posts. We saw with many terrorists, like the “thoroughly vetted” San Bernandino terrorists (who despite Barry’s claim were not “homegrown”), that they openly state their intentions and disdain for America. The FBI has had many people they received warnings about that should have raised a red flag but they routinely ignore them or dismiss them.  They stopped looking at Mateen out of fear he was being profiled for being a Muslim.

Our government constantly tells us, “See something. Say something.”  But whenever we’re witness to some murderous Muslim buying up body armor or unusual amounts of ammunition and report it, we’re constantly being ignored.  Or when a Muslim terrorist is heard openly stating that he is killing people in the name of Allah, these same people tell us that it has nothing to do with Islam and instead blame Christians, saying that we have too many rights.  Too many rights?  What, like the right to defend myself from those who wish to kill me for no other reason than my faith?

Barry “Almighty”, and his entire team of which John Kerry-Heinz is a proud member, has repeatedly demonstrated that it has zero interest whatsoever in protecting the  American people.  And should Hitlery Clinton manage to get herself elected we can expect very little to change in that regard.  Because whether one wants to admit it or not there seems to be a growing bond between the Democrat Party and the violent cult known as Islam.  And it does not bode well for the American people.  And it is but one more reason why she should never be permitted to become president.

Look, those who belong to this so-called religion, and around whom we’re supposed to walk on eggshells, are really nothing more than members of a vile cult.  One based on hate, violence and death. And as such they are nothing more than a plague for which the time has now come for us to take decisive action.  We must now work to focus all of our efforts and do all that we can to exterminate, eradicate, eliminate, annihilate and obliterate every last vestige of this threat if we are to survive.  It is a clear and present danger to the civilized world.

And what makes this threat we face all the more dangerous is the fact that the Democrat Party now appears to have chosen on which side of the battle it prefers to fight.  There is simply no other way to explain the actions taken not only by our president but by members of his party as well.  Democrats have apparently decided to team up with those whose only purpose in life would seem to be the complete and utter destruction of a free and prosperous America.  They insist upon blaming the actions of these Muslim radicals on everyone but the Muslim radicals.



Don’t get me wrong, I know everybody loves to get ‘free’ stuff, myself included, but the truth of the matter is that there is no such thing as a free lunch and eventually the gravy train is going to simply run out of track.  And the sooner we come to realize that and stop buying all of the pie in the sky nonsense we that we continue to hear from Democrats, the better off we’re all going to be.  And I realize it’s much easier to just sit back and collect our government check than it is to have to work for a living, but let’s face it, like it or not everybody needs to grow up.

And having said that, the fact is that this year those of us who are still lucky enough to remain employed, and have to pay ever-increasing taxes, will collectively give more of our hard earned money to the government in the form of taxes than we will spend on food, clothing, and housing combined, so says a new report from the Tax Foundation reveals.  Now keep in mind that it’s 49 percent of our fellow Americans who no longer need to worry about paying the tax man because it’s been determined that their fair share equates to zero being owed to the tax man.

If you’re like me when you hear that inflation-adjusted federal tax revenues have hit a record $1.48 Trillion for the first half of fiscal year 2016, which began 1 October 2015, it’s enough to make your head explode.  And what should piss everybody off is the fact that so much of that money is wasted.  Because even after having taken in such a massive amount the federal government has still managed to run a $461 Billion deficit during that same time.  And it’s that information which comes to us courtesy of the latest monthly Treasury Department statement.

In the first half of fiscal 2016, which includes the months of October, November, December, January, February, and March, the amount of taxes collected by the federal government outpaced the first half of all previous fiscal years, even after adjusting for inflation. The federal government collected $1,476,218,000,000 in the first half of fiscal year 2016.  And it was most of that $1.48 Trillion that came from individual income taxes, which comprised almost half of that total, totaling $675 Billion.  It just boggles the mind how the government rips us off.

It was one year ago that the government collected $1.42 Trillion in inflation-adjusted revenues in the first half of fiscal year 2015. The Treasury Department has been tracking this data on its website since back in 1998.  In that fiscal year, the federal government collected $1.11 Trillion in inflation-adjusted revenue in the first half of that fiscal year.  Which means that since 1998, tax revenues have increased a staggering 33 percent.  And what sort of return is it that we the taxpayers have gotten in return for all that money?  Absolutely nothin’!

And now I’m guessing that it’s in an effort to maintain Barry’s pathetically anemic rate of economic growth that we’ve experienced over the course of last seven years that Democrat presidential candidate, and frontrunner, Hitlery has now confirmed that she fully plans on raising taxes by at least $1 Trillion dollars.  She made that announcement during an interview with New York Daily News released this past Monday.  She has proposed a slew of new hikes – including a 28 percent cap on itemized deductions to raise $350 Billion for college subsides.

It’s through what she calls a “business tax reform” that Hitlery said she plans to bring in $275 Billion for infrastructure purposes and plans to raise somewhere between $400 and $500 Billion in revenue by eliminating certain deductions, raising the death tax, capital gains tax and implementing the “Buffett Rule,” meaning anyone making over $1 million a year will face at least a 30 percent tax rate.  It would appear that Hitlery feels there is no limit to how much she can take from hardworking Americans, and that we’ll be only too glad hand over to her even more of ‘our’ money!

Americans for Tax Reform said the projection will likely be much higher than Hitlery admitted in her interview as it doesn’t factor in her planned hike on capital gains, tax on stock trading or her proposal to prevent corporate inversions.  The Tax Policy Center, a Washington, D.C.-based non-partisan think tank, said Hitlery’s plan to increase marginal tax rates would reduce “incentives to work, save and invest,” and would make the tax code more complex.  Where’s the incentive to work when you’re forced to hand over nearly half of what you make to the government?

So I guess my question to Hitlery, and Bernie as well for that matter, would be, why bother to stop at just a Trillion?   I mean why not simply go straight to the end-game that all leftists really want and raise all taxes to 100%. That way the government could simply collect ALL of the money generated by our labor and then dole it out however they please.  Want to buy a car?  Nope, sorry. For that you have to work another month.  Oh, and by the way, just so you know, that won’t leave you with enough money to buy food, so make sure you choose wisely.

And why is it that the Democrats seem to be completely unable, or unwilling, to approach our growing fiscal problems from a position of reducing our insane level of spending?  One would almost think that they are purposely trying to drive this country into bankruptcy.  But that’s not possible, right?  What could anyone hope to accomplish by doing that?  Do those in the Democrat Party hate America that much, is their hunger for power that strong?  But it’s after seeing how the party has now tilted so sharply to the left that that’s the only conclusion I can come up with.



One of the very few people out there who continues to make any amount of sense regarding our current, and somewhat harried, Republican primary season is none other than former Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.  While Gingrich seems to take some level of pleasure in mocking, and even openly criticizing, those desperate Republicans demanding a brokered convention as a way to stop GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, he makes the point that if they are successful they will accomplish nothing more than to throw the election to Hitlery.

Gingrich has said, “I think it’s pretty simple. If you want to help elect Hillary Clinton, and you want to make sure that the unionized bureaucracies are totally in control, and you want to have a radical Supreme Court to finish eliminating our liberties, then play games like this. But that’s what they are: They’re games.” And he went on to say, “There are two choices in America. There’s the choice that accepts the continued decay and continued radicalization of continued Americans. That’s the Hillary Clinton road.”  And he’s exactly right!

He said, “And there’s the choice that says no, we need an alternative, and that’s the Donald Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz road.”  And added, “But there’s not a third choice.”  He warned:  “And these people who the self-important definers of America, who are telling us about this fancy third choice, they make no sense at all. They ought to at least be honest and say to people: “You know, I’d rather have Hillary Clinton than the Republican nominee.” Because that’s what they’re doing. They ought to just form “Lost Republicans for Hillary” and be honest about the effect of what they’re doing.”

He continued by saying, “Of course, if Clinton gets indicted, it could be worse. It could be Sen. Bernie Sanders. But they all have the same functional effect. They all empower the union bosses. They all empower the radical judges. So, the choice for America’s future is very straight forward, and I’ve just tried to be clear about that.”  Gingrich dismissed the idea that the Beltway Right’s anti-Trump faction had any real opposition to Trump beside purely discomfort.  And isn’t it so very ironic how it is that we who are always simply expected to hold our nose and vote for a RINO, but when the RINOs need to hold their nose, all they do is whine.

He said, “They don’t have an ideological argument. They have a comfort zone argument. Look, Ted Cruz is clearly a constitutional conservative. He is clearly deeply embedded into intellectual conservatism, and that makes people who are more traditional conservatives more comfortable,” adding, “Donald Trump isn’t.”  He went on to say, “Donald Trump is this unusual phenomenon of this extraordinarily successful businessman who has thoroughly mastered popular communication, who woke up and said to himself: ‘I’ve got children. I’ve got grandchildren. My country’s in deep trouble. I don’t need to go make any more money. What if I tried to turn the country around?’”  He said, “Does he have contradictions in his past? Of course he does.”  But he adds, “Trump would be an absolute outlier in the trajectory of American politics.”

Look, at the end of the day I think if you’re a reasonable individual you have to say that Newt is right.  These ‘NeverTrump’ people simply don’t make much sense and they are really only out for themselves. They see the possibility of losing their power as now being a very real while oblivious to the fact that if Hitlery wins everything they supposedly love comes to an end. What’s left of our Constitution will be destroyed. Liberty and freedom comes to an end. The party of slavers, Jim Crow, race baiters, and traitors finally achieves complete victory, and the rest of us are toast.



Our country, in case you haven’t noticed, is in a real pickle, and frankly I’m not sure if there’s enough time left to fix it before the whole thing goes up in smoke.  One thing I do know, though, is that if the last seven years have shown us anything, it’s that anyone from the left is totally incapable of fixing it.  The only thing the left is actually capable of doing is to make matters so very much worse.  And while it would be easy to blame those on the left alone for the growing predicament in which we now find ourselves, it would more than a little disingenuous, as well as more than a bit dishonest.  Because they had more than a little help.

There is more than enough blame to go around.  It would be easy to blame everything on Barry and the Democrats.  And as much as I would like nothing better than to do just that, he and they are not entirely to blame.  A sizeable portion of the blame can be placed squarely upon those of us who, when provided with an opportunity to step up and do what we all knew was necessary, have repeatedly demonstrated that we simply were not up to the task at hand, and did nothing more than to take the easy way out.  As we the voters seemed quite content to send back to Washington those who were nothing more than part of a continuing problem.

In short, when our country needed us, we chose to do nothing more than to turn our back on it.  The last time our country was in such dire straits we were there for it, we manned up and we elected Ronald Reagan, twice.  But these last three elections, when provided with the opportunity to step up, we stumbled.  We can blame it on the state controlled media, on ‘The Establishment’ or on any number of other things, but at the end of the day, we simply lost our way.  We were far too willing to believe what we were told instead of doing what we knew in our hearts needed to be done.  It was easier to send back to Washington those who serve no useful purpose.

Those we have elected, and often re-elected, could have done so much more to get the country headed back in the right direction, in fact they promised to do so.  But when all was said and done they told us only what we wanted to hear and we were foolish enough to take them at their word.  And once safely elected they became afflicted with some sort of political amnesia.  Because they were, sadly, far more concerned with their own careers than with the survival of our country.  And we, the generation entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding this the greatest experiment in human freedom have so badly botched things up.

We have been very badly burned over the course of the last several election cycles, falling prey to those who were, unfortunately, talking out of both sides of their mouths.  Our trust was taken advantage of and now many see an opportunity to exact some amount of retribution from the very ones whom they feel have lied to them, repeatedly, by voting for someone they see as being an outsider.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m pissed off too, but I’m more scared than I am pissed off.  But that said, we must not allow ourselves to become so blinded by our anger that we become susceptible to making even a bigger mistake.

But what if:

After the 2010 election when the voters clearly demonstrated their displeasure with Barry’s leftist agenda by handing the Republicans a 242 to 193 majority in the House, the Republicans had actually done something to begin to reel in Barry’s already out-of-control spending and to permanently begin the defunding process of Obamacare which was ‘passed’ earlier that same year?

Or if,

They had taken the hint provided to them in the 2012 election when the saw their majority in the House shrink to 234 to 201 advantage. and then began to take action against Barry drive to “fundamentally transform” America?

Or finally if,

They had kept any of the promises made throughout the 2014 election cycle that not only resulted in a Republican majority in the House of 247 to 188 but also a majority in the Senate of 54 to 44?  Which was clearly a mandate for change.

And what if Barry had not been elected back in 2008 and Hitlery or John McCain had been?  How would things be different today?  While I’m not sure that we would have still ended up being saddled with something like Obamacare, I have little doubt that our spending problem would have continued unabated regardless of who it was that had been elected.  Because too many Americans simply don’t care if we are living beyond our means, only that they continue to get their ‘free’ stuff.  And if Barry had never being elected, would the Republicans, I wonder, have ever gained a majority in Congress, not that it would have mattered much.

And when it comes to Donald Trump, the outsider I was previously making reference to, while I am nowhere near ready to start making comparisons to Hitler, as more than a few others now have, my main issue with him, after having been burned so often, is one of trust.  Can he be trusted to do any of what he has said he will do if elected?  Could anyone do what he has promised to do?  And I remain hesitant about supporting someone who is so completely outside of the political process.  Because while he may be very skillful in the business world, when it comes to the inner workings of a complex federal leviathan, he is, after all, a novice.

And with our country now teetering precariously on the edge of a near bottomless abyss, frankly, I’m not sure who to support.  While I know full well that either Hitlery or Bernie would only serve make matters so very much worse, of those still standing on my side, none can be said to instill much confidence that they would be up to the monumental task at hand.  The amount of damage that has been allowed to take place over the course of just the last seven years may well be beyond the abilities of any one man, no matter how skilled.  And, I’m afraid that much of what has taken place may well be, in large part, beyond repair.

And, sadly, so much of what we are now experiencing could have been so easily avoided.  All we, the voters, needed to do was to have been just a bit more responsible when it came to selecting those who would represent us in Washington.  But nope, our priorities when selecting our ‘leaders’ did not seem to include ensuring that our country would remain solvent for future generations.  Instead we seemed quite comfortable with making those same future generations responsible for covering the bills that we seem only too willing to generate.  How selfish, how inconsiderate, how…un-American!  So now many look to the outsider to fix things.