OBAMA PROFESSES TO BE CONCERNED FOR THE RULE OF LAW???

053

Has there been a president in recent history who possessed a more reckless disregard for the ‘rule of law’ than, ‘BO’?  And it is for that very reason that we need to stop giving the first black president a pass on all the seditious acts of his administration.  He was, without a doubt, nothing more than a complete and utter failure as well as a treasonous, anti-America enemy of the people.  From the fake Russian collusion to ‘Fast & Furious’ to a weaponized IRS used against conservative groups and on and on, ‘BO’ got away with such things for the very simple reason that he was black.

And so knowing ‘BO’s low opinion of the ‘rule of law’ I found it rather odd when, on just this past Friday, ‘BO’ put forward his claim that the “rule of law is at risk” because of the Department of Justice’s decision to drop its criminal charges against General Michael Flynn.  It was during a virtual discussion with members of something called the ‘Obama Alumni Association’ that ‘BO’ was heard to say, “The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn.”

‘BO’ went on to say, “The fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”  During his remarks on Flynn, ‘BO’ erroneously said the former White House national security advisor pleaded guilty to perjury.  Which wasn’t exactly true.

What Flynn was charged with was lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) about his contacts with then-Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during President Trump’s transition period. Flynn pled guilty in 2017 as part of then-special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into now-debunked collusion between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.  In January, the Justice Department changed its sentencing recommendation for Flynn from probation to six months in jail, prompting Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea because prosecutors broke their plea agreement.

‘BO’ also discussed the importance of the presidential election in November, vowing to campaign vigorously for the presumptive Democrat nominee ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden, who served as his vice president.  ‘BO’ said, “This election that’s coming up on every level is so important because what we’re going to be battling is not just a particular individual or a political party.”  And he said, “What we’re fighting against is these long-term trends in which being selfish, being tribal, being divided, and seeing others as an enemy — that has become a stronger impulse in American life.”

Now I can’t be the only one who smells something a little fishy about the timing of ‘BO’s comments regarding General Flynn in that they came shortly after newly released documents from the government’s motion to dismiss their case against Flynn show that at a January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with then-Vice President ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, after which ‘BO’ had asked Comey and Yates to “stay behind.”

‘BO’ told them he had “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with Kislyak, where they discussed sanctions his administration had levied against Russia. (A memo penned by then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice also showed that ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden stayed behind as well.)  ‘BO’ “specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”  Yup, the same guy who seems to be so concerned regarding “the rule of law.”

What else it is that we can possible expect from a corrupt, lying piece of crap like ‘BO’? There’s no doubt that he is at the very center of all of this.  It was HIS guys who set Flynn up and it was HIS guys who lied to the media and Congress about it.  And it was HIS guys who subverted “the rule of law,” that ‘BO’ professes to care so much about, and to go after the then President-elect and the incoming Trump administration. ‘BO’ and his entire administration were a vengeful political apparatus that didn’t think twice about destroying anyone that stood in its way.

So what ‘rule of law’ is it that allows a corrupt ‘presidential’ administration to open a felonious ‘investigation’ without a lick of any evidence of a crime being committed just to entrap a political opponent into a procedural crime which they then had to falsify evidence in their effort to make than ‘crime’ stick, all in order to promote the personal political gain of a sitting ‘president?’  You cannot put the words ‘rule of law’ and ‘BO’ in the same sentence.  It becomes an oxymoron.  The ‘BO’ administration was, without a doubt, the most lawless ever to occupy our White House.

Without a doubt the ‘BO’ years were the darkest years in all of American history.  The rule of law was in far greater danger when ‘BO’ was in power.  Susan Rice and Hitlery lied to congress and NO CHARGES.  ‘Fast & Furious’ gun running to the cartels and again NO CHARGES. Hitlery passing secured documents through an unsecure non-governmental email server and still again NO CHARGES.  ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden accepting payment from China and Ukraine and NO CHARGES.  ‘BO’ himself sending of pallets of cash to Iranian Mullahs to fund terrorism, and NO CHARGES.  Rule of law?

It’s doubtful, regardless how the election turns out in November that anything is really going to change, or change to the degree that it needs to.  The Democrats have been exposed beyond any reasonable doubt for what they are, they are guilty of the most treasonous of crimes and yet they continue to project their crimes onto others. Meanwhile, the ‘fake news’ media selectively reports these findings to the American public or outright fabricates a false narrative so that as of yet, not one of these miscreants has been held accountable for their malfeasance.

A large portion of the public still swallows the hooks in willful ignorance because otherwise, it would mean they would have to reflect on their own confirmation bias and evaluate their way of thinking. The DNC, their allies and the left in general could care less what truth is in their quest for absolute power and as such, do you think rule of law, the Constitution or any other barrier or opposition to their end goals will matter? No, instead they only act in a more dangerous and aggressive manner pushing us one step closer to what it is really going to take to remove this threat.

One response to “OBAMA PROFESSES TO BE CONCERNED FOR THE RULE OF LAW???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s