RINOs 30

You know, if there was a button I could push that would make every single RINO in Congress go up in a burst of flame followed by a puff of smoke I would gladly push it.  I mean just how much of a piece of shit must you be to willingly take part in what is now going on in Congress, disguised as an impeachment process but what is in reality something that has never before occurred in this country, but is something quite common in most third world countries, especially those of the ‘banana republic’ variety.  It’s nothing less than a political coup?  I find it all quite disgusting.

And chief among those much in need of going up in smoke would be none other than RINOs Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney who as recently as yesterday said that he believes it’s “important” for John Bolton to testify in the Senate impeachment trial, and Susan Collins who said that she too thinks that the leaks from Bolton’s upcoming book may tie into the case that “strengthens” the argument for calling him as a witness.  Once again these two notorious back-stabbers make it abundantly clear exactly whose side it is that they are on.  And once again it is not the side of the American people.

It was sore-loser Willard who said, “I think with the story that came out yesterday, it’s increasingly apparent it would be important to hear from John Bolton.”  And this fraud then went on to say, “I, of course, will make a final decision on witnesses after we’ve heard from not only the prosecution but also the defense. But I think at this stage it’s pretty fair to say that John Bolton has a relevant testimony to provide to those of us who are sitting in impartial justice.” I really pains me to no end to admit that I once voted for this guy.  That’s one vote I would love to have back.

Meanwhile, whereas Willard at least had the guts to face reporters, it was Collins who instead simply chose to release a statement, on Monday, in which she said that she is still in favor of witnesses at the trial. She said, in her statement, “The reports about Bolton’s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a number of conversations among my colleagues.”   Her colleagues?  By that I’m quite sure she means that she had conversations with all of her fellow RINOs there in the Senate, which, these days, seems to be more than quite a few.  A bunch of turncoats!

Willard, who is a longtime hater of President Trump, has indicated for some time now that he’s onboard with the calling of additional witnesses as part of the upper chamber’s proceedings, including Bolton.  It was earlier this month that Willard said, “I support the Clinton impeachment model, which is a vote on witnesses later. But as to which witnesses I’d want to hear from, and so forth, that’s something which I’m open to until after the opening arguments.”  And he added that Bolton is someone who “I would like to hear from, and presumably, I’d get the chance to vote for that.”

And not to be left out of this unique little band of turncoats, and also deserving of going up in smoke, are fellow RINOS Lisa Murkowski and Cory Gardner who have joined forces, so to speak, with Willard and Collins in thinking that it would be a Hell of a good idea to hear from Bolton, especially after the New York Times leaked a portion of Bolton’s yet to be released new book.  And then, of course, there’s RINO Lamar Alexander, who also appears to be compelled to want to hear from Bolton, viewing himself safe, I assume, since he won’t be running for re-election.

And it was Murkowski too who took the coward’s way out by choosing to release a statement in which she said, “I stated before that I was curious as to what John Bolton might have to say. From the outset, I’ve worked to ensure this trial would be fair and that members would have the opportunity to weigh in after its initial phase to determine if we need more info.  I’ve also said there is an appropriate time for us to evaluate whether we need additional information —that time is almost here. I look forward to the White House wrapping up presentation of its case.”

Look, both Willard and Collins, hate President Trump with every fiber of their being and both are corrupt establishment hacks!  AND, both represent everything that’s rotten within the modern Republican Party, many of whose members, as do both of these hacks, like to refer to themselves as being ‘conservatives.’  But, as they say, actions speak much louder than words and that these RINOs would even entertain joining forces with those trying to overturn an election that occurred over three years ago tells us everything we need to know about of them, and every other RINO!

And perhaps someone could convince them to shift their focus back to the case presented to them by the House, and only that case, instead of trying to expand it. Bolton isn’t even mentioned in the articles of impeachment.  He’s absolutely irrelevant.  Perhaps they should focus on the meal that’s in front of them?  This is all so ludicrous.  I mean, do they really think we’re too stupid to see what they’re doing?  Apparently not, since word now comes that we have yet another RINO in the Senate, James Lankford, declaring that the Senate needs to see Bolton’s manuscript.

So what we end up with is a case where the usual suspects are working to legitimize the illegitimate sham of an impeachment process.  And either they’re too stupid to realize that this supposed ‘leak’ was designed to do exactly what it is doing, or worse are somehow complicit in bringing it about.  Bolton releasing this tell all book at this time is beyond irresponsible.  I assume that Bolton’s got a bone to pick with President Trump, and chooses to act as cowards always do, by stabbing he who ‘offended’ him in the back instead acting like a man. I actually used to like this guy.  Stupid me!

The only “new” witnesses the Senate should even consider wanting to hear from would be those called by President Trump’s team. The Democrats made their case, as poor as it was, and had witnesses to support that case. There is no justification for new witnesses on the Democrats’ behalf at this stage of the impeachment process. On the leaks, there is a long history (3 plus years now) of highly selective edited, misleading, or fraudulent leaks made against President Trump.  Why would you give ANY anonymous leak against the president ANY credibility at this point in time?

So I’ll ask again, whose side it is that these people continue to be on?  Most certainly not our side!  This entire process has been nothing other than completely insane!  It’s as if we the people no longer even exist.  The bottom line here is that we simply cannot trust those whom we send to Washington to do anything other than what THEY want to do once they get there.  And apparently they think that we should be ok with that?  Well, we’re NOT!  But I’m a little unclear how best to get that message across to them.  Sure, we could simply vote them out, but then what?  Is it a Catch-22?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s