It would seem that MSNBC is now the network of choice for every leftwing crackpot who might be looking for a platform from which they can spew their nonsense.  Just this past Sunday we had ‘Slow Joe’ Biden showing up to tell Al Sharpton about how Republicans don’t want blacks or working class Americans to vote, and on the same network we also had ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters going off on yet another of her psychotic rants about how President Trump continues to be the “most despicable, the most deplorable human being” that she has ever encountered in her too long of a life.

For the life of me I can’t quite figure out who in their right mind would ever take seriously any discussion between buffoons like Al ‘Bull Horn’ Sharpton and ‘Slow Joe’ Biden that has as its topic race relations and politics in this country.  But apparently someone over there at MSNBC thought there was a sufficient number of inquiring minds dying to know, since just such a discussion took place this past Sunday when these two boobs got together on Sharpton’s MSNBC program, “PoliticsNation.”  It was then that Biden told Sharpton that Republicans don’t want blacks to vote.

A partial transcript of that bizarre little discussion is as follows:

‘Bull Horn’: Let me ask you about voting rights. That was another thing the Obama-Biden administration was heavy on under attorney general well as Lynch going in with lawsuits against voter ID and doing in to deal with voter suppression. They have said that foreigners are voting.

‘Slow Joe’:  “It’s a lie. It’s a flat lie. The assertion the president made from the beginning is a flat lie. Every study, every program -every commission that looked at it said it’s simply not true. It’s part of the big lie. You realize just in past year, in 24 states, the administration’s allies have introduced 60 pieces of legislation, or maybe 70 pieces of legislation, to curtail the franchise. It’s what these guys are all about, man. These Republicans don’t want working-class people voting. They don’t want black folks voting. Look what we are doing now.”

“There’s a movement. You have George Will making the argument that felons should have their—after serving their time—their right restored to vote. What is the one thing we want people getting out of prison to do? We want them to engage in society again. What’s the most significant thing you can do to engage? Get in and vote. These guys, you’re talking about 1.5 million people who have served their time who are unable to vote. Of those there are 30% or more that are African American. We should have like other countries have, automatic registration.”

“You turn 18, you go to any government agency, Department of Motor Vehicle, get your Social Security number clarified and you are automatically registered to vote in your district. We should be be engaged. That’s the one thing that keeps people focused on what’s going on in their country. It’s totally crazy.”  Actually, what’s totally crazy is the fact that there still people who view Sharpton as being some sort of ‘civil rights’ leader, and ‘Slow Joe’ as being anything other than a creepy old pervert with a penchant for little girls.  But hey, that’s Democrats for ya!

Meanwhile, also on MSNBC, ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters said, “The president calling Comey a liar is laughable. The president is the biggest liar in the universe. The president accusing Comey of having leaked classified information — well, look what the president has done. He gave classified information to the Russian ambassador and foreign minister right in the White House, and it certainly made our ally, Israel, very upset that he had done that. So the president trying to defend himself against Comey and trying to make someone believe that he’s telling the truth really does not fly.”

She went on to say, “I think that our special counsel, Mueller, has been doing a great job. I do think that this president should be forced to testify. All of this business about him not wanting to interview, what is he hiding? If he’s not guilty of anything, why is he resisting so hard, you know, coming forward and interviewing and telling his side of the story? I believe that the president of the United States is perhaps the most despicable, the most deplorable human being that I’ve ever encountered in my life. He does not deserve to be president of the United States. I want him impeached.”

And then, essentially confirming what we already know, that should the Democrats be permitted to seize control of Congress, courtesy of this November’s midterm election, their number one priority will be the impeachment of President Trump, she said, “I don’t want to wait until 2020. I think this country deserves better. He has no respect for our democracy.”  Speaking of having no respect for our Democracy, where was this moron during the eight years we on the right were forced to contend with Barry ‘O’.  Oh wait a minute, HE was a Democrat so everything was cool then.

Regarding ‘Slow Joe’ Biden’s incendiary comments, Democrats have now so overused the playing of the race-card that it has now become pretty much meaningless.  As we all know it’s typically the first accusation that gets thrown around whenever the accuser has nothing else to offer. Yet, Democrats like old ‘Slow Joe’ continue to toss it out as if it actually means something.  By the way, I think it was plainly evident that candidate Trump worked tirelessly to lure the vote of the working class, and it was obvious that the working class responded vaulting him to President Trump.

So ‘Slow Joe’ Biden is either a blatant, and chronic, liar or more than the oblivious bumbling idiot that we all think he is.  And for this old dolt to deny that voter fraud is rampant and has been very well documented, is simply dishonest.  But then we are talking about ‘Slow Joe.’  Asking someone to produce an ID is not suppression, it’s nothing more than an attempt to make sure everyone’s vote counts.  And yet the Democrats despise ID? Very telling, don’t you think?  Shouldn’t everyone want to make sure elections are legitimate?  Why do they oppose this sovereign process?

And when it comes to ‘Mad Maxine’s’ imbecilic comments, there’s nothing that comes out her mouth anymore that surprises me in the least.  She’s what most reasonably intelligent people identify as being nothing more than a race baiting pimp who intentionally keeps the people in her district poor and uneducated.  She votes for illegals to take their jobs and against carry laws that would allow the people of your district the right to defend themselves.  She’s against school choice that would allow children a better future.  ‘Mad Maxine’ is everything that’s wrong with America.

And in the eyes of a leftist dullard like Waters, anyone attacking Barry ‘O’s legacy is a racist, just as any police officer who pulls a black driver over is a racist.  They’re so angry and full of hatred that they want to see black people basically go through their lives unencumbered by the laws and realities under which the rest of us live.  Not being afforded that elitist privilege, they will scream racism every time. Their visceral hatred of President Trump is entirely predictable, as no one has done more to un-do the damage done to America by eight years of Barry ‘O’.

‘Mad Maxine’ is nothing if not one of the most racist individuals you would ever have the misfortune of coming across.  She represents everything that’s wrong with race relations today.  And there can never be a true discussion about race relations as long as individuals such as herself have access to a microphone. And let’s be honest here, if she wasn’t black, a woman and a Democrat, she would have long ago been put behind bars instead of simply getting a slap on the wrist for all of her too many yo list here crooked deeds.  That she has the nerve to attack the president

So am I therefore to assume that if Republicans, especially those who call themselves conservatives, are nothing but a bunch of racists who want neither blacks nor working class Americans to vote and our current duly elected president has no respect for our Democracy that all hope for saving our Republic will be completely lost unless the American people come to lose their collective mind and all decide to vote for the likes of Biden or Waters?  How insane would that be?  Do Democrats really think that people are that stupid?  Granted many are, but hopefully not yet enough.


Behar 2

While I cannot say, with any degree of certainty, how many of those women with whom I come into contact on a daily basis watch this particular example of leftwing lunacy, aka ABC’s ’The View’, what I can say, and very confidently so, is that very few, if any, of them would EVER actually admit it!  And it’s become increasingly difficult to distinguish which of those women who share the hosting duties of this silly show has now become the more unhinged.  But if you were to ask me as recently as yesterday the answer would have to be the esteemed Ms. Joy Behar.

And that would be because it was on Thursday’s rather nauseating episode of ‘The View,’ that Ms. Behar went so far as to actually suggest that President Trump is not as sane as North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un or Russian President Vladimir Putin.  It was while the ‘panel’ was discussing potential U.S. military action in Syria, as if any one of these losers possesses sufficient brainpower to do so, that Ms. Behar came out with her rather idiotic assessment of the president’s sanity, comparing it to two of the most cold blooded killers on the planet.

Behar said, “We have gotten to a point in the world now where we have to rely on the sanity of Kim Jong Un and Putin over the president of the United States. That’s where we’re at.”

Co-host Meghan McCain, although far from being what one could call a supporter of President Trump, came back, saying, “My issue is the moral relativism between Putin and Kim Jong Un and President Trump. I think it’s easy to sort of sit here and say that.”

Behar asked, “Why do you think Kim Jong Un is less moral than Trump? Do you?”

McCain said, “Oh my God!”

Behar asked, “On what topic?”

McCain said, “Chemical gassing of children. Last time I checked, America isn’t doing that to anyone.”  Behar replied, “Wait a second. Kim Jong Un doesn’t do that. I don’t know are you talking about?”  McCain said, “Joy, I’m trying—I’m really trying right now, and I know there is frustration about the way we’re communicating about this, and I completely understand it. But I will say it’s hard for me to sit here with moral relativism about Trump. If you think Putin and Bashar al-Assad and President Trump are the exact same thing, it’s when you lose all arguments with me in every way.”

Behar said, “Let me clarify what I said. What I’m saying is I see the two of them with backing off of war, and I see President Trump provoking war. That is what I see.”

McCain shot back, “If there is any understanding of history on this, Assad would not have the power he has right now if it weren’t for Putin amping him up, giving him military, bombing hospitals. Putin did that, and Trump didn’t do that.”

Behar is obviously suffering from one of the worst cases of Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder, aka TARD, ever to be diagnosed.  That, of course, being a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic behavior, first observed in the late hours of November 8, 2016, and increasing in severity with passing time.  Those suffering from TARD often exhibit pronounced cognitive dissonance, sudden bouts of intense rage, uncontrollable crying, suicidal ideation, and extreme sadness.  And the only treatment known to be effective is exposure intense therapy.

And the ONLY hope one has for reaching any sort of a permanent cure for this rampant psychotic condition, or to at least successfully gain some level of remission for her condition for the next six years, calls for the patient to be repeatedly exposed to politically reality over gradually longer periods of time, and to be made to wear a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat, in the color of their choice, as long as they are able to tolerate it, until they are eventually able to wear it 24/7.  Together we can beat this Scourge, and finally “Make America Great Again!”

Or, am I just way over-thinking what it is that might be affecting Ms. Behar’s mental state?  After all, there could be another much simpler explanation for her increasingly bizarre behavior and one that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump.  That being, of course, that fact that she’s simply crazy as a shithouse rat and in need of a nice comfortable padded cell somewhere safely out of sight.  Because at the end of the day she’s contributing to the confirmation that the vast majority of Democrats are truly insane and pretty far removed from reality.

And I now find myself wondering if there are any Democrats who are not raving leftwing kooks.  They were all just so certain that Hitlery was going to win, and then when she didn’t something within them seemed to snap.  Frankly, I’ve never seen anything quite like it.  Granted, over the last 30+ years there has always been some level of meltdown every time a Republican president has been elected.  Starting when Reagan won, a little more so when Bush 41 won, considerably more when Bush 43 won and then when Trump won the level of meltdown went off the charts.

One thing I suppose you could say that the Republicans have in their favor is the fact that we have loony, disgusting people like Behar continuing to say some of the most vile and outrageous things about the man who many of us voted for.  The people across America have been watching and listening and it would be nice to think that there will be some form of a price to pay.  America is largely a nation of good people who believe in fairness and there is nothing fair in what the liberals are doing or saying about anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their radically leftwing beliefs.

And ya know, I can’t help but wonder just how sad and miserable one’s life must be for someone to take however much time is needed out of every day, time which they will never get back, and waste it by watching these pathetic, know-nothing imbeciles who never have anything intelligent to say.  I can only assume that their audience is made up primarily of Democrats.  After all, who else would bother watching this kind of tripe?  Personally, I would sooner shove a sharp stick in my eye, but that’s just me.  Life is far too short to waste even a second of it on such foolishness.

Come on people, really?  The country is hanging by a thread and the fact that anyone is wasting any amount of time listening to this little cadre of such bimbos is a sin.  Sadly, far too many of us seem to have forgotten what it means to be ‘American.’  There was a time when to be ‘American’ was something truly unique.  But now not so much.  And one of the reasons for that is far too many of us spend our time listening to people like these boobs.  Boobs who see nothing special about being American.  We need to ignore those who say America is just another country, because it’s not.



Apparently what I would refer to as being the forces of darkness, aka those who comprise ‘The Resistance’, are said to be gathering.   And it is these forces that consist of hundreds of progressive candidates, most running in state and municipal elections this fall, who are all streaming into Washington this week.  These folks make up the Democrat Party’s hardcore leftwing and are coming together in an effort to formulate a plan that they hope will better enable them to ‘seize’ control of Congress, statehouses and local governments all across the country.

They are excited and as is usually the case with liberals, they are angry, very, very angry. And too, they are also literally consumed by a rather scary level of HATE, the source of which seems to be little more than their rather intense level of opposition to President Trump, one that borders on being more than just a little psychotic.  And we are told they are ready to fight any calls to moderate their liberal ‘passions.’  And make no mistake they are ready to pull out all the stops and are desperate in their attempt to make significant gains in this November’s midterm elections.

Take, for instance, a fella by the name of Greg Edwards, one of a half dozen or so Democrats running for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 7th district, who said, “We’re at a moment when we need to be unapologetic.”  So here we have a guy who was, apparently, an “ardent” supporter of old Bernie Sanders in the last presidential election, and who claims to be unapologetic for now wanting a single-payer health care system, universal preschool, “debt-free” college and a $15-per-hour minimum wage.  But then isn’t this always how those on the left go trolling for votes?

And it was also this same guy who knocked those he describes as “centrists” within his own party who may be willing to compromise their progressive “values” just to get elected.  As if in today’s Democrat Party you could find anyone who might still be anywhere near the center.  And, apparently, he’s not alone.  There is said to be roughly 450 like-minded Democrats will be gathering in Washington today for a four-day conference that offers a new window into intraparty tensions over how to capitalize on the surge in grassroots enthusiasm in this the age of Trump.

So this odd assortment of angry leftists, described as “resistance warriors” by organizers, is now convinced that their party will lose this fall unless it chooses to embrace a broad slate of uncompromising progressive candidates who deliver “an Elizabeth Warren-style economic populist message.”  At least that’s according to Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which coordinated this bizarre little shindig.  Green said, “Not only can you run on your values and win, but it is necessary to do so in some of these red districts.”

Sanders and Warren will be the headliners of this leftist get together the purpose of which is to give lesser-known Democrat candidates at all levels a crash course on winning in the Trump era.  It’s not enough to simply oppose Trump, organizers say.  Participants will learn how to look good on television, find donors, design websites and, perhaps most importantly, develop a message around progressive economic priorities.  Several of the progressive movement’s most aggressive allies will also be on hand: groups such as Indivisible, Planned Parenthood and the AFL-CIO.

Privately, some Democrats appear rather reluctant to embrace a strategy that appeals most to the party’s more ‘liberal’ side, particularly when many of the most competitive races this fall will take place in regions where President Trump won.  Jesse Ferguson, a Democrat strategist who worked for Hitlery’s campaign said, “Competitive primaries help organize and help fuel the enthusiasm that’ll help us take control.” And added, “Candidates don’t need to move all to the left or all to the center. They need to come across as running for what they genuinely believe.”

Republicans, albeit rather prematurely I think, are cheering these latest Democrat efforts to move even further to the left, certain that candidates who emulate Sanders and Warren will end up alienating the moderate voters and disaffected Trump supporters who might otherwise back Democrats this fall or sit out the midterm elections altogether.  Doug Deason, a prominent Republican donor said, “It’ll be tough to fight that winning message that Elizabeth Warren sends out to the world: socialism.”  And he went on to say, “That’s great. That’s what they should embrace.”

To be honest I am a little concerned about what November’s midterms may bring.  The Republicans seem to have purposely shot themselves in both feet, and over what? Because Trump was elected president?  How completely idiotic is that?  And because they just could not bring themselves to assist President Trump to do what the American people elected him to do we now find ourselves in a mess of their making because of what, the fact they think they know better than those of us who voted for Trump?  Hell, it’s because of them that we voted for Trump in the first place!

And what I hope to see happen come November is not some ‘blue wave’ that so many are now so confidently predicting, but with a red tide.  If we were serious about wanting to drain ‘The Swamp’ when we elected President Trump, then what we must be focused on is replacing every RINO we can, and not with leftwing kooks.  Instead, they must be replaced with bona fide conservatives, or at least with those who are far more concerned about being able move forward with the Trump agenda than were their RINO predecessors.  In a world of snowflakes, WE MUST be the heat!



I think I would be correct in saying that if the election of Donald J. Trump has shown us anything, it’s that we are abundantly aware of just how deeply entrenched ‘The Swamp” truly is.  And I have to be honest, I find it all more than just a little frightening.  And ‘The Swamp’s’ chief henchman, Robert Mueller, seems to be able to do pretty much as he pleases as long as it’s President Trump who remains his intended target.  And both the volume, and intensity, of the threats that are now being directed at the president regarding any decision to possibly fire Mr. Mueller, from both sides of the aisle, makes pretty clear the determination of those mired in ‘The Swamp’ to make sure that this attempt to railroad this president arrives at the proper conclusion.  That conclusion being, of course, his impeachment.

Personally, if I were an advisor to the president, I would be encouraging him to fire this hack, Mueller.  This supposed ‘investigation’ that was initially set in motion to ‘investigate’ any potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Vlad Putin has now come so completely off the rails as to make it appear, even to the most casual of observers, as nothing more than a political witch-hunt of the worst kind.  And a witch-hunt that were it being perpetrated against a Democrat would have ended as soon as it had left the rails.  But since it’s being carried out against a Republican it must be allowed to reach what many see as the ‘right’ conclusion.  Let’s face it, since the search for collusion came to dead end, new issues worthy of impeachment need to be found, and thus the search for such issues continues very enthusiastically.

Let’s face it, if Mueller was truly interested in getting to the bottom of any Russian involvement in our election, and not behaving as some sort of political hatchet man, he would be investigating ALL suspects of any potential collusion including the very obvious collusion that took place between the Hiterly Clinton campaign and…wait for it… the RUSSIANS.  But since that’s not the case, it just makes this entire exercise appear to be more than just a little unsavory.  And it’s behind the scenes that we know many of our spineless RINOs are working right alongside Democrats in what is nothing more than an effort to undo an election that occurred nearly 18 months ago, all the while laughing at Trump voters.  These are ‘The Swamp’ creatures that we must get rid of as they represent the greatest threat to our freedom.

To anyone with even an ounce of intelligence, it should be painfully clear what’s underway here.  And it’s something considered to be far more common in some banana republic than in the country one referred to as being the beacon of freedom.  So we now know that the draining of ‘The Swamp’ will prove to be beyond the capabilities of one man, even if that man is Donald Trump.  So what are we, the freedom loving people who still remain in this country, to do?  Well for one thing it’s not to take the opportunity that this November’s election will present to us, to elect more Democrats to Congress.  Doing that accomplishes little more than to enlarge an already too large and too deep swamp.  The focus must be on electing as many as we possibly can of those willing to assist the president in draining ‘The Swamp!’

And at the risk of sounding overly melodramatic, I would argue that this November’s election is truly one of the most pivotal and crucial elections that we the American people have ever been made to face.  And I also think that it was our three previous elections that essentially brought us to be where we now find ourselves.  In a way, it ALL comes down to this November.  And it is everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING, that hinges on what we decide to do, or not to do.  That said, the decision to be made is far from being a complicated one.  Actually, it’s very simple, do we side with ‘The Swamp’ and allow this lynch mob mentality to continue, or do we elect more anti-swamp individuals who will then go to Washington and join forces with the president in addressing what has now become more of a sewer than a swamp.

And what I find to be somewhat worrisome is the fact that there are some Republicans in Congress, who because of their hatred of President Trump are willing to “take out the President” through impeachment if he fires Mueller.  They see this as being retribution, of a sort, for what they fear will be the loss of their congressional majorities in the House and Senate come this November’s elections.  It’s a curious take on things by those Congressmen.  Because if anything is depressing Republican voters it’s the failure of the Republican Congress to enact the Trump agenda. Obamacare is still the law of the land, spending remains out of control, the wall is not funded and, in fact, Congress voted to stop Trump from building the wall or doing much of anything to secure the border and fix the immigration system.

Also Congress has failed to stop the ‘Deep State’ war on Trump and the Senate is stonewalling Trump’s appointments to the courts and his administration.  And now we hear about how some ‘bipartisan’ group of four senators, just yesterday, introduced a bill that would specifically prevent President Trump from firing Mueller.  The bill would, among other things, “ensure that the Special Counsel can only be fired for good cause by a senior Justice Department official, and the reason must be provided in writing.” RINO Chuck Grassley, according to some lawmakers, plans to advance the bill in the Judiciary Committee on Thursday.  If the measure wins the approval of a majority of the panel, which is possible since all Democrats will likely back it, RINO Mitch McConnell will decide whether to bring it to the Senate floor for a vote.

While McConnell still has to sign off on it there’s really no longer any reason to bother with the formalities, the knives are out and unfortunately for President Trump, not one Republican has his back.  So what do you call a system of government in which a man elected to the presidency by legitimate means, and who got 63 million votes, can have his election erased so easily?  It sure as Hell doesn’t fall under either a Democracy or a Republic.  So in the end it’s going to once again come down to ‘We the People’ to make things right.  And at the end of the day either we decide to simply rollover and join forces with the enemies of freedom or we decide to take matters into our own hands and embark on a mission that will result in the kicking to the curb as many of those same enemies of freedom as we possibly can.



The ‘Left’ in this country continues to execute what can only be described as a coordinated effort to portray our duly elected president as being some sort of crazed, out-of-control dictator.  And yet another attempt was recently made by Democrat Joseph Crowley claiming that President Trump’s plan to send National Guard troops to our southern border is “a very provocative move” because of the language that he has used towards immigrants.  At least that’s what he told Democrat sympathizer Chris Wallace during an appearance this past weekend on “Fox News Sunday.”

According to this boob, “Here we have a very partisan approach to this. The president talks about building a wall, but Mexico is going to pay for it. Now, he’s putting troops down at the border, a very provocative move. But at the same time, it’s not really solving the problem.”  Crowley seems to have forgotten how it was that ex-president Barry ‘O’ sent 1,800 National Guard troops to the border through Army National Guard Operation Phalanx in 2010.  And prior to that, former President George W. Bush sent National Guard troops to the border through Operation Jump Start in 2006.

Wallace reminded this genius of just that by saying, “Wait a minute. You say it’s a very provocative move. Barack Obama put 1,800 at the border.”  To which Crowley responded by saying, “It was to some degree provocative, not in the same breath that this president has done. What the verbiage, the language that our president has used towards immigrants in this nation is really — it’s abhorrent to me, quite frankly. It’s not representative of who we are as a nation. So, this president, making this move is different from any other president doing it quite frankly.”

I’m tired of hearing these dirtbags saying, “It’s not representative of who we are as a nation.”  It’s not about racism, it never has been.  It’s about citizens being fed up with there being laws for me, but not for thee.  And this creep knows it, he’s just too duplicitous to admit it.  And you have to wonder, do guys like this hear how stupid they sound when they oppose President Trump on an issue they supported under Barry ‘O’, or do they think we’re just too stupid to notice?   It’s just incredible that no one ever challenges these idiots on the left no matter how blatantly hypocritical they are.

And when asked how confident he is that Democrats will win mid-term elections and take back control of Congress, Crowley said, “We’re a long way from November. Let’s be clear about that, but I’m confident that the American people want to bring balance back to the United States government.  He added, “What they see right now is Republicans in charge of the presidency, the Senate, the House and some would argue the Supreme Court. Every branch of government seems to be controlled in some way or facet by Republicans.”  Wallace said, “Forgive me. That was what voters decided.”

Crowley said, “Well, look, they have an opportunity here to change course and correction. That’s the beauty of our democracy. The House of Representatives, every member of the House of Representatives is up for election this year and a third of the Senate. So, people have the opportunity to bring that balance back.”  And he added, “We know that the first midterm election of an incumbent president on average sees 40 seats swing in the opposite direction. It’s not going to happen on its own. Democrats are not going to win that back just simply being against President Trump.”

He went on to say, “We need to be for, as I mentioned before, our economic policies, our better deal and is a deal are become very clear to the American people.”  As far as the economy goes, we saw what those policies favored by Democrats were able to accomplish during the eight long miserable years that we had Barry ‘O’ in the White House.  The very same policies which this moron, Crowley, no doubt favors never resulted in anything more than an anemic growth rate that was constantly described as being a ‘recovery’ by both Democrats and their many minions in the media.

President Trump is by no means the out-of-control dictator that Democrats would have us all believe he is, any more than the Democrats are the folks that we should want to be turning over the task of creating economic policy.  Because, after all, higher taxes do not a stronger economy make.  And if that’s not something you learned during the Barry ‘O’ years, then I would argue that you’re too stupid to vote.  The Democrat Party has absolutely NO interest in securing our borders or in taking the measures we all know we need in order to maintain a strong and vibrant economy.

So come this November one would think that the choice between which side to vote for would be fairly obvious.  Granted, the Republicans have done precious little to demonstrate that they are worthy of maintaining control of Congress.  But that said, what’s the alternative?  Being forced to tolerate two years of impeachment hearings that would then be used by Democrats as nothing more than a means of further obstructing the president’s agenda regarding border security, protecting our Second Amendment, and the economy?  Come on people, get with the program.


Lewis 07

I know, I know, it’s impossible for someone who’s black to be a racist. But there is no one who proves better the falsehood of that claim than someone who, oddly enough, was laughingly once referred to as a ‘civil rights’ leader.  And yes I’m talking about John Lewis.   And in proving my point I need to go back no further than last Friday, when during Friday’s Democrat Weekly Address, Lewis remembered Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.  He stated there has been progress made in the past 50 years, “But there are new forces trying to take us back, trying to turn back the clock, trying to take us to a darker time.”  Yup, and the majority of those forces are…BLACK!

You can watch Lewis’s racist rant here, or read the transcript of the rant which follows:

“Hello. I am John Lewis, and I represent Georgia’s Fifth Congressional District.  On April 4, our nation and the world paused to remember Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Growing up as a boy in rural Alabama, I remember when Rosa Parks and Dr. King came together in December 1955 to launch the bus boycott in Montgomery.  As a young man, I wrote Dr. King a letter, and his response changed my life forever. Dr. King was my inspiration, my leader, and my mentor. He was my friend.  Back then, segregation and racial discrimination were all around us – in the voting booth, in the courtroom, and in the classroom.

In many parts of our country, people of different races could not sit together on a bus, sleep in the some hotel, or drink water from the same fountain.  Dr. King taught us the philosophy and the discipline of nonviolence and sparked a nonviolent revolution – a revolution of values, a revolution of ideas, and a revolution of action. On August 28, 1963, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial the world learned of his dream of building the beloved community.  Over the years, he convinced President Eisenhower, President Kennedy, and President Johnson to understand that civil rights was a moral issue.

He used his moral leadership to fight for equal justice for sanitation workers, for people of color, for those who had been left out and left behind.  In particular, I will never forget when Dr. King spoke in Berlin against the danger of building walls. He reminded the global family – the global community – that God’s children were on both sides of the wall.  In the past 50 years, as a nation and as a people, we have made progress. But there are new forces trying to take us back, trying to turn back the clock, trying to take us to a darker time.  Times like these can seem overwhelming, but I ask you to recommit yourself to the way of love, the way of peace, and the way of nonviolence.

I ask you to look in your heart and to trust that justice will prevail.  If Dr. King were with us today, he would continue to push our country to respect the dignity and the worth of every human being – no matter where they are born, no matter their race, age, religion, or gender identity.  He would argue that we have a right to know what is in the food we eat, the water we drink, and the air we breathe.  He would preach that we have a mission, an obligation, and a mandate to leave this country and this little planet a little cleaner, a little greener, and a little more peaceful for generations yet unborn.

Most importantly, if Dr. King were alive, he would ask each of us to speak up, to speak out in the face of injustice, and he would demand that each and every one of us to do our part and do it well.  Thank you.”

I guess, in one sense, you could say Lewis is right.  There ARE forces wanting to help blacks in America get back to the days when they worked, went to school, got married, had children, stayed away from drugs, stayed out of prison, respected the law, and didn’t spend so much time killing one another.  But those hideous days are too difficult for Lewis and his ilk to comprehend.  He much prefers how 75 percent of blacks are now born out of wedlock and 50 percent of blacks are dropping out of school, and chooses to ignore how those things hurt the Black community the most.  But Democrats always ignore the facts, it always has to be someone else’s fault.

Lewis has been in Congress for over 30 years and his district is one of the worst in all of Georgia.  And therefore I think it perfectly fair to say that Mr. Lewis, himself, can safely be described as being the member of these ‘racist forces’ of which he speaks.  As such, it’s doubtful that he’s played any part in the progress that has been made.  And when has this man ever done anything to help anyone but himself?  All that he has managed to create for himself came by using Dr. King’s name and reputation.  Lewis chose to exploit his relationship with Dr. King and, in so doing, was able to construct for himself a political career that has gone on for far too long.

All this guy has ever done throughout his entire career is to look out for himself.  He doesn’t give two squats about those folks in the black community.  He views them as being nothing more than as a source of votes.  He’s accomplished nothing, zero, except continued racial bitching and moaning.  He has elevated himself on the backs of his constituents while their plight has only further deteriorated.  Just look at the crime and poverty statistics for his district.  He should be thankful that Dr. King is not around today, because if he was he would be ashamed of all those like Lewis who cry that racism is the reason why blacks are not able to better themselves.

And then there’s the rampant drug problem, non-achievement mentality, fatherless children, welfare breeders, the dropout rate in the black community and the embracing of violence that seems to be a part of their culture.  The black community is its own worst enemy but they continue to blame everyone else for their problems.  Then there’s Lewis, a ‘supposed’ former civil rights leader, who has made a rather nice living for himself by complaining about things the ONLY solution for which is the spending of MORE money, lots more.  And after all the tax money giveaways, and eight years of having a black president, things are now worse than ever.

I am well aware that you don’t need me to tell you how it is that Democrats base everything on the color of one’s skin or how they do NOT want blacks with character.  Because possessing character means that you believe in yourself and can think for yourself.  Democrats long ago turned Dr. King’s dream into a national nightmare and for no other reason than to maintain them as a reliable voting bloc.  Democrats use it AGAINST blacks, having convinced them that they cannot succeed without them.  Whites have lost all patience and compassion for their plight.  As for myself, fool me once, shame on me, fool me for three entire generations, shame on you.

Lewis talks of how we need to commit ourselves to the way of love, the way of peace, and the way of nonviolence.  This pathetic hypocrite preaches love, peace and nonviolence while he remains a very vocal supporter of openly violent groups like ‘Black Lives Matter’.  A group you’d be hard-pressed to describe as one committed to “the way of love, the way of peace, and the way of nonviolence.”  And where was racist scumbag while this very same group was chanting, “Pigs in blanket, fry ‘em like bacon?”  Oh, that’s right, he was nowhere to be heard.  Such is the reason that it has become a waste of time to take anyone in the Democrat Party seriously.

Lewis is a racist of the very worst kind!  He followed Dr. King around for years while he preached about the races working together, judging a person by the content of their character but ever since Dr. King left us racist scum like Lewis, Cummings, Sharpton, Jackson, Barry ‘O’ and others have done nothing but work night and day to cause discord between the races, and to moan and groan about how everything is so unfair.  I doubt that Dr. King would be pleased with their behavior!  What a shame because we were turning things around and now we’re right back where we began, and it’s only because of these black racists like Lewis and others like him.



I‘ve never been a fan of Chris Wallace, and frankly I was surprised when he showed up over at Fox News.  Surprised because, at least to me, he always seemed to be much better suited for a network like CNN or MSNBC.  Seldom is he genuinely objective when he has a guest on his show who’s a conservative.  He was, and remains, a member of the NeverTrump crowd, as evidenced by the open hostility he directed at candidate Trump and has continued to direct at President Trump.

So on Friday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” when anchor Chris Wallace stated that President Trump’s “unprecedented” criticisms of the media bother him, in particular, the president criticizing the press during his news conference with the presidents of Baltic nations, I wasn’t surprised.  But I must admit I was surprised when Wallace finally admitted that there does exist an obvious bias that is exhibited by those in the ‘mainstream’ media toward conservatives.

Wallace said, “Well look, I think there are two things that are going on here, and I think they can both be true. I think that the president has been engaged in — and I’ve said this before — in an unprecedented attack on the media. As a member of the media, maybe not a member of the mainstream media, but a member of the media, and I’ve been doing this for almost half a century, it bothers me.”  Unprecedented?  He doesn’t remember Barry’s constant attacks on his own network?

Anyway, he went on to say, “I was particularly distressed, I have to say, when the president held that joint news conference with the three presidents of the Baltic nations, and — you know, it’s one thing when we fight amongst ourselves, it’s a different thing when it’s on the international stage — talked about the fake media. You know, I’ve never heard a president bash the media when it’s on — when he’s dealing with foreign leaders.”  I could be wrong, but I think Barry did as well.

He added, “On the other hand, do I think that there is bias among members of the mainstream media?  Absolutely.  You can see it on the front pages of some newspapers. You can see it on the lead on some of the newscasts that — or so-called newscasts of some of our competitors.  So, I think both of those things are true. And I’m not sure that it’s especially healthy for the country.”  What’s unhealthy is having a news media that seems to have forgotten what its purpose is.

Wallace claims that President Trump’s criticism of the media is unprecedented BUT the media’s attacks on the president are even more so.  And those in the media have also focused attacks on those who voted for Trump, on those few politicians who defended the president in the media, and on conservative entertainers who support President Trump.  It’s the level of hostility being directed at this president that should be considered as unprecedented, and they deserve unprecedented criticism.

And the American people see what’s going on, and we know that because we have an unprecedented level of distrust of Wallace’s beloved media where 77 percent of the American people agree that the ‘mainstream’ media reports much that is nothing more than ‘fake news.’  What’s being ‘reported’ these days, even by more than a few on Fox News’, especially if it relates to President Trump, is little more than pure propaganda the purpose of which is to instill distrust of our president.

The media has always been biased in favor of the Democrat Party although over the last decade or so they’ve become much more obvious about it.  It would seem to be that each new story about the president must be made to be more outrageous than the last. The new purpose of those in the media is to openly protect a Democrat Party that has become increasingly corrupt and further left, and to provide all manner of necessary cover to ANY Democrat running for office, not matter what.

Wallace may be upset that his ‘profession’ is being singled out, but it’s the vast majority of those in his profession, including himself, that essentially brought that about.  Many in the media now have a vendetta, of sorts, against the president, and they will never forgive President Trump for having successfully “gotten under their skin” and exposing them for the frauds that they truly are.  So the form of retaliation that they have chosen is to say absolutely anything about him, true or not.

Let’s face it the final nail in the coffin of the ‘mainstream’ media was the election of Barry ‘O’.  They provided all manner of cover for him and kept his questionable past firmly under wraps.  Many even advocated for his socialist agenda.  When Trump was elected president the media became ENRAGED and joined the Democrat Resist Movement.  The media has lost the trust of a majority of Americans and is now simply too dishonest to admit it, so instead, like Wallace, they blame Trump.

And let’s be honest, though a difficult task for those in the media, an attack on outright liars in the media, and incompetents who rush a story without properly sourcing it, is NOT an attack on the press.  No one gave any one individual or news outlet an exclusive monopoly on presenting news to the nation.  If they can’t get it right, or at least appear to be neutral in reporting, perhaps they should get into another line of work.  Many ARE reporting ‘fake news’ and they need to be called out.


Pelosi 09

Well, if there is anyone out there in need of that little extra nudge to convince them that voting Democrat this November is the right thing to do, then it was earlier this week that Nancy Pelosi went out of her way to provide you with that nudge.  You see, it was on Wednesday of this week that Pelosi “vowed” that Democrats will rework the Republican tax bill if they are successful in their endeavor to retake the House in this November’s midterm elections.  Hey, she convinced me!  NOT!!

And it came about while she was speaking at a Culver City town hall event as part of the Democrats’ “Repeal the Trump Tax” tour.  Pelosi pledged to those in attendance that Democrats would overhaul the tax bill into one that “creates growth, creates good-paying jobs, as it reduces the deficit.”  And in making it clear how she feels about the GOP tax cuts, it was in typical Democrat fashion that this shriveled up old hag said, “Over 80 percent of the benefits go to the top 1 percent.”

Now look, we all know, or should know, that Nancy favors tax hikes more so than tax cuts.  And in what was a blatant effort to mischaracterize the GOP tax cuts she said, “Eighty-six million middle-class families will see a tax increase while they advertise it as a middle-class bill.”  Despite her claim, it’s according to the non-partisan Tax Policy Center that the average household will receive a tax cut of $1,610 in 2018.  Only 5 percent of taxpayers will see increased taxes in 2018.

And then it was one of Nancy’s trusty little sidekicks, Ted Lieu, who happens to be another California Democrat, decided to throw his two cents into the argument by spewing what has become the typical brand of leftwing fearmongering by throwing around claims about how the Republican tax cuts would result in “deep cuts to Social Security, to Medicare, to all these critical programs that serve a lot of Americans.”  None of which has any real basis in fact.

Now of course Pelosi didn’t bother to offer up any specifics when asked if Democrats would re-work the bill from scratch or focus on specific portions, saying instead her party would work openly with Republicans to reach a deal.  She said, “One of our complaints about what they did with the tax bill is they did it in the dark of night with the speed of light.”  I think she must be a little confused here, because isn’t that exactly how Nancy and her fellow Democrats ‘passed’ Obamacare?

And never-mind what she actually did with Obamacare, the 2400 pages only put out to Congress the day it was ‘passed’, with something like 400 of those pages being added just a couple of hours before the vote!  If it weren’t for double standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.  But if it weren’t for disinformation, Democrats wouldn’t have any information at all, and if it weren’t for ‘fake news’, Democrats wouldn’t have any news at all.  But I digress.

Nancy said, “We’ll sit down at the table and say … what would be a tax bill that creates growth, that creates good paying jobs as it reduces the deficit?”  And she added, “It’s not about chipping at this piece or that piece, it’s about a comprehensive look at what our tax policy should be for the future.”  She said, “Secondly, we would do it so it would be transparent so that people could understand the ramifications of this, that or the other.”  Transparent in the same way they ‘passed’ Obamacare?

Pelosi’s comments Wednesday come after she said in February that Democrats would have to “replace and repeal” the GOP tax bill upon retaking the House.  And it was Chuckie Schumer who offered a more specific proposal towards reworking the GOP tax plan in March.  His plan called for a number of tax hikes, including lifting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent, raising the income tax rate to 39.6 percent for high earning Americans and slashing the carried-interest tax loophole.

Chuckie said, “We want to roll back the Republicans’ tax giveaways to corporations and the wealthy and invest that money instead in jobs and infrastructure.”  All of this despite the fact that public opinion polls indicate voters are warming to the Republican tax bill, up from 37% in December to 50% in February. It kind of tells you how thoroughly screwed up things have now gotten in this country when Americans have to ‘warm up’ to the notion of getting a tax cut.  Bizarre!

But you know, this is all such a worn out and tired argument, and nothing we haven’t heard before and more times than I care to count.  Democrats knows full well that if people are encouraged to work and to build lives for themselves, and their families, they will likely become less reliant on government and therefore less likely to vote Democrat.  So it’s been in recent years that Democrats have seemed less interested in trying to disguise their platform and now profess to be proud Socialists.

Hence the reason they don’t seem to like the fact that nearly three million NEW jobs have been created in the economy and most of them are in manufacturing where wages are higher than during the eight years of Barry ‘O’.  Additionally individual wages have grown by nearly 2.5 Percent under President Trump.  And if Democrats do regain control of the House, the Senate, or, God forbid, both we can once again look forward to economic stagnation and job losses.

The Democrats seem to be returning to the same “We intend to raise your taxes. Vote for us!” campaign platform the rocketed Walter Mondale to his heartbreaking, cliffhanger of a razor thin, 49 to 1 loss to Reagan in 1984, wherein Mondale pocketed a hefty 13 electoral votes. But this time they are adding a little “furthermore, we intend to flood your neighborhoods with Mexicans!”  We can only hope that the plan works as well for the Democrats as it did for old Walter back in ’84.

Let’s face it, when was the last time anyone can remember when those in the Democrat Party honestly cared about private sector job growth and debt reduction, especially during the eight years of Barry ‘O’.  Barry was only concerned about doubling the “irresponsible, unpatriotic” national debt, debt that he had vowed to cut in half within four years.  And he was responsible for bringing about a labor participation rate that was the lowest since the days of Jimmy Carter.

Thank GOD we now have Nancy openly stating EXACTLY what it is that the Democrats have in store for the American people should they be able to return to the majority in one, or both houses of Congress.  Now we know if conservatives don’t turn out en masse to keep these Democrats from taking over the House and/or the Senate, we may never see a Republican president again.  Democrats will seek to punish us and to strip us of every single thing that we have worked so hard for.

I once heard Hitlery make the claim, I think it was during her most recent failed attempt to become the first female president of the United States, that the economy ALWAYS does better when there is a Democrat in the White House.  But when comparing the eight years of Barry ‘O’ to the first year of President Trump, the difference, economically speaking, could not be more stark.  And what do the Democrats want to do?  Nothing but to return to the same failed policies.


Hitlery 26

So here we are nearly 17 months after the last presidential election and still the Hitlery Clinton ‘Blame Express’ continues to roll on down the highway showing no signs of running out of gas any time soon.  It was just this past Tuesday that Hitlery was found speaking to an organization who just so happens to be under investigation for gender discrimination, as she continued to lay all manner of blame on any number of people who she sees as being responsible for her embarrassing loss.  And nowhere on her list does it mention the fact that she herself is the ONLY reason she lost.

‘The Wing’ is currently under investigation by the New York City Commission on Human Rights for not allowing men into their “co-working space and social club.”  Wing co-founder Audrey Gelman and podcast co-host Aminatou Sow asked Hitlery questions in front of an audience at ‘The Wing SoHo’ that was live-streamed to the group’s website. The mood was extremely supportive of Hitlery and critical of the current presidential administration, as the two hosts lobbed softball questions at Hitlery, who spent much of her time listing those she blames for her 2016 defeat.

Asked whether the #MeToo movement would have happened by now if she had been elected, Hitlery said yes and claimed that her loss accelerated the wave that was already coming.  She then lamented how hard it is to watch Donald Trump be President, but that she admires the “resistance.”  Hitlery talked about trying to keep herself aligned with what will make a difference, the midterm elections, a “political action that reigns in this administration.” She said without that, you haven’t “seen the bottom yet.”  Yet had she been elected we would have gone through the bottom.

Hitlery said, “You can march from now til doomsday, but if you don’t elect people who agree with you, and defeat people who don’t, nothing will change.”  But isn’t that exactly what we ‘Deplorables’ who voted for Trump did?  We chose to elect the guy who essentially agreed with us on most of the issues and to defeat the woman, not because she was a woman but, because she was someone with whom we agreed on virtually nothing.  And the sooner the old girl comes to grips with that little fact the better off everyone is going to be, including her own beloved Democrat Party.

Hitlery also took the opportunity to paint the Electoral College as outdated, saying that it “does an injustice to the idea of one person one vote,” pointing to it as a “part of the slavery compromise back in the day where small states with much less population than big states … would be able to have their votes counted in a much more impactful way than if it were just a popular election.”  She then suggested support for work to “change the directions that electors are given,” to vote for the person who got the most votes in the country instead of the most votes in their state.

And of course Hitlery also blamed the Access Hollywood tape news for overtaking media coverage of the CIA director and Director of National Intelligence, on October 7, stating that Russia was interfering in the 2016 election.  She blamed WikiLeaks leaking DNC emails for further dominating media coverage instead of the Russia interference and she even brought up the Pizza-gate ‘scandal’ which she used as a way of transitioning into talking about how Trump continually brought up WikiLeaks on the campaign trail, skewing the information there into “bizarre interpretations.”

She repeatedly commented that it was generally accepted that she was going to win and that that did complicate things.  She said the press didn’t know how to cover the election and reverted to criticizing her, and that people must demand that the press “check their sexism and their misogyny” in their treatment of those running for office.  Gleman asked Hitlery what her legacy will be and Hitlery pointed to her 1995 “transformational” Beijing speech on women’s rights as her public, political life legacy and being the first woman nominated by a major party for President.

She said sometimes the struggle gets to be too much, that “there’s still so much in society that just batters you,” and that she hopes that women will be supported in places like the Wing. She said she hoped that her “persistence” and “resilience” will “give people the courage to keep going.” She called it the “best form of revenge by making it clear you are not going to be stopped, you’re not going to be disrespected, you’re not going to be undermined, you’re gonna be who you intend to be, and if that’s some small part of my legacy, then I will be very, very happy and grateful.”

Hitlery will be remembered as the presidential candidate who everyone thought was unbeatable because she was running against a person who those in the media and in Hollyweird simply laughed at from the time he announced he was running.  Then she got trounced in the Electoral College that she now criticizes as being outdated.  And while she should be indicted for her many crimes, and breaches of our national security, she won’t be.  And she will be remembered for being nothing more than a failed power-hungry megalomaniac that people were too smart to elect as president.

Personally I’d be glad if all of the madness simply came to an end with Hitlery finally accepting the fact that there was no grand conspiracy that prevented her from obtaining that which she thought she so richly deserved.  Barry ‘O’ spent his entire eight years in office blaming Bush for all that went wrong on his watch, so is this now what we can expect from Hitlery for the next two, or possibly six, years?  Are we going to be forced to listen to how it was that she was somehow robbed of her rightful place as first female president of the Unite States?  If so, just shoot me now!

The truth is that Hitlery, just like millions of other folks, was convinced that there was absolutely no way she could possibly lose to Trump, and yet she did.  Her plan was to play it safe, to keep a low profile and to simply coast to a win, which, in looking back, was obviously the wrong strategy.  And now I can only assume that her loss was such a traumatic event for her that it must have caused something within her to simply snap.  Thus, practically since election night, we’ve been subjected to what has become nothing more than a growing laundry list of excuses for why she lost.



I say self-inflicted because it all started with a creation of Teddy Kennedy’s called The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.  The passage of which marked a fundamental change in America’s immigration policy because rather than serving the interests of Americans and national unity by setting limits on immigration, the act put “family unification” as the top priority, serving the interests of foreigners first.

And it was at the time that Teddy made the following claims about his little creation:

Teddy said, “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. 

Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset… Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think… The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

Thankfully since then old Teddy has moved on to the great beyond where, as I so fervently hope, he will spend all of eternity rotting in Hell.  But, knowing the perverted old drunkard like we all did, how have Teddy’s claims stood up to the passage of time?  Well, I’m afraid not exactly as old Teddy predicted they would, which should come as no surprise since he knew he was lying when he made them.

Because you see:

Fifty years later, the Census bureau predicts that the foreign-born population is set to increase 85 percent by 2060, where Hispanics will see their number grow by the tens of millions and native-born whites are the only group expected to decline in both absolute numbers and fertility rates.

Fifty years later, the U.S. places no numerical limit on the immediate family members of aliens admitted into the country. Despite holding only five percent of the world’s population, the U.S. is the most popular destination in the world for immigrants, attracting 20 percent of all the world’s migrants.

Fifty years later, the U.S. allows some 11 to 20 million illegal aliens to squat on its territory while allowing over one million more each year to legally enter the country.

Fifty years later, the native-born population of whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews and all the rest suffer economic loss while the foreign-born see net job growth.

Fifty years later, Central American governments are propped up by $12.2 billion in remittances taken out of the American economy by foreign workers the U.S. refuses to tax or expel.

Fifty years later, Central American migrants, thousands of whom are indigenous Mayans who can’t write or speak even Spanish, storm the border in endless waves while federal agents fly them to nearly every state in the union without so much as a photo ID — while American citizens are fondled and scanned by the very same TSA agents.

Fifty years later, we had Rep. Luis Gutierrez threatening Americans in Spanish, vowing that they will be made to suffer “electoral punishment” for resisting a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, declaring his one loyalty is the not to the United States but to foreigners breaking immigration laws, and printing “Do Not Deport Me” cards for those same individuals.

Fifty years later, Americans were led by a president, Barry ‘O’, who illegally granted deportation stays for five million illegals that allowed them to get Social Security numbers (and therefore the ability to vote in U.S. elections) along with $35,000 per head in tax benefit freebies forcibly taken from Americans who managed to hold onto their jobs, who joyfully predicted that a “President Rodriguez” will leave the borders wide open for future tsunamis of immigrants.

Fifty years later, American schools punish “racist” students who wear shirts depicting the American flag and taxpayer-funded colleges vote to ban the flag after angry illegal immigrants complain it “triggers” them.

Fifty years later, American marathon runners walk on prosthetic limbs and suffer through countless painful surgeries after Moslem Chechen immigrants Tamerlane and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were granted asylum so they could plot against the country that bent over backwards to accommodate them.

Add to all that the costs Americans pay in lower wages, strained social safety nets, their children’s blood, their declining quality of life, the chaos of sharing space with an ever-swelling criminal population aided and abetted by the nation’s elite, the berating Americans of every stripe endure when they dare ask their country merely be preserved, that’s the real legacy of Teddy ‘The Boozer’ Kennedy.

If nothing else this provides yet another example of how the Democrat Party and those who insist upon voting for Democrats, have long been the greatest threat this country has ever been made to face.  And we now find our country in a situation for which there may be no real solution.  And because this is yet another mess created primarily by Democrats, Democrats have no interest in finding a solution.

And again, what we see happening is exactly what was intended to happen.  But this is but one more example of the damage that has been done to this country by a political party that has been focused for decades on one thing, the complete destruction of the greatest experiment in human freedom ever created.  And we the people have played a very active role in essentially bringing about our own demise.

Our Constitution is neither a self-actuating nor is it a self-correcting document.  It requires the constant attention and devotion of ALL our citizens. There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention, back in 1787, Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created.  His answer was: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Well it took us a bit over 230 years but today our republic is now quite literally hanging by a thread.  And while, I suppose, it would be very easy to lay all of the blame on our politicians, the sad truth of it is that we the people had to elect those politicians.  Politicians who claimed to have the best interests of our country at heart but in fact are interested in nothing more than what remains best for them.

And then once they’re elected too many of us are too blind, too ignorant or simply too uninformed to recognize that they have no interest in us or the country, and never did.  So here we are, on the verge of having squandered something so rare and leaving behind for our children not a legacy of freedom, but of potential servitude to a government not of, by and for the people but of, by and for the political elite.