THE SUPREME COURT…WHY I AM VOTING FOR TRUMP…

691

Just chalk this up as being my last plea for folks to simply suck it up and focus on what’s best for the country and for the future of our kids and vote for Donald Trump.  Granted he is not the candidate that many of us wish we had, but he’s the candidate that we do have and one that is a far better option than the candidate being put forth by the Democrats.  At least I am able to say, with a great deal of confidence, that Donald Trump loves this country.  Which is something I feel I can’t say about Hitlery.  While the economy is very important, as is keeping the homeland safe from those practitioners of the cult often times referred to as a “religion of peace”, the single most important issue for me is maintaining a Supreme Court that is more center right than it would be hardcore left.

When Chief Justice John Roberts promised the Senate Judiciary Committee he would serve as the U.S. Supreme Court’s umpire — dutifully calling balls and strikes — he most certainly did not anticipate Justice Sonia Sotomayor swinging for the fences from the end of the bench.  As one barely suited to serve even on some low level city ‘night court’, Sotomayor is one who so very obviously has no business whatsoever serving as a justice on the highest court in the land.  But as we all know, her selection by Barry had far less to do with her judicial prowess than it did with her willingness to legislate from the bench.  And it was Sotomayor who gave the Robert A. Stein Lecture at the University of Minnesota Law School Monday night, where she let slip the inner monologue that runs during oral argument.

It was there that ‘Justice’ Sotomayor told the assembly, in reference to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, “There are things he’d say on the bench, where if I had a baseball bat, I might have used it.”  So this is the caliber of individual that Barry “Almighty” thought suitable for nomination to the court and the Senate thought worthy of conformation?  Really?  So I’m sure you can sense the level of my fear when it comes to just who it might be that Hitlery would nominate and a Senate, likely to be controlled by the Democrats with none other than ‘Chuckie’ Schumer running the show, most assuredly would confirm. And if that little nightmare scenario doesn’t send a cold chill right down the center your spine you’re either dead, a NeverTrumper or a hardcore Hitlery supporter.

It was during this very same lecture that Sotomayor went on to acknowledge the rather significant ideological chasm between them, but said losing Scalia was the equivalent of losing a member of one’s family.  So I’m guessing she views as being acceptable behavior the beating of one’s family member with a baseball bat?  She has elsewhere said she suspects Scalia raised arguments “just to annoy” her, but that they enjoyed a warm interpersonal relationship.  She further explained it was important not to impute ill will to one’s adversaries.  She said, “If we’ve lost anything, it’s remembering that differences don’t stand, necessarily, on ill will.”  And she went on to add, “If you keep that in mind, you can resolve almost any issue, because you can find that common ground to interact with each other.”

So, are you having a difficult time telling she’s a Democrat?  Violence is always the answer when they hear something they don’t like.  Instead of trying to convince others into accepting the validity of their position, their normal course of action is one of character assassination, slander, innuendo and, of course, violence.  And it’s a vote for Hitlery that will result in getting more losers like Sotomayor onto the high court.  Sotomayor very clearly reveals herself to be little more than your typical, run of the mill, Democrat thug, no different than the “protesters” burning down Ferguson, the fire bombers in North Carolina, the spray painters in Bangor, or those who thought it was ok to dump human feces into storm drains.

According to liberals being a conservative means being opposed to everything liberal, which means despising anything associated with being a liberal. Liberalism, according to liberals, is strongly aligned with the values of science, honesty, rationale, human rights and reason.  Conservatives, again according to liberals, oppose those values in and of themselves.  Actually, Liberals, in the context of current politics, deny individual Liberty and Justice as put forth in the U.S. Constitution. Liberals hate America as well as the founding documents of this country.  By denying people of their God-given rights, liberals have no moral basis for their rather twisted line of thinking.  Conservatives, on the other hand, want to ensure those rights for everyone, regardless of religion, race or sex.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s