liberals 03

How it is, exactly, that in a nation where those on the left have absolutely no problem whatsoever in allowing the killing of millions of black babies each and every year, the method of choice being abortion, it’s at the very same time, and from many of the same people, we also continue to hear how it is that black lives matter?  Or that there can take place in this country a record number of murders every year, most of them black and in a place that has the strictest gun laws in the country, and yet we continue to hear from the gun control crowd that if only we had stricter gun laws we could finally bring an end to all of the senseless violence taking place in this country?

And it is from those who are so desperate to take guns out of the hands of law abiding Americans that we saw what was yet another example of the liberal lunacy that continues to plague this country.  It was demonstrated just this past Friday when California Attorney General and now U.S. Senate candidate Kamala Harris continued to defend sanctuary cities even after illegal alien Francisco Lopez-Sanchez confessed to murdering Kathryn Steinle in San Francisco.  She attempted to justify her idiotic stance by suggesting that the admitted crime of one illegal immigrant should not dictate immigration policy for all illegals.  Is that not just plain nuts?

Let’s face it, a better example of the left’s hypocrisy on murder would be difficult to find despite the fact that the examples of such hypocrisy are as numerous as they are dangerous.  And while I’m quite sure that it all makes sense to liberals, to rest of us, it sounds like nothing more than the liberal lunacy that it is.  I mean think about it, on one hand when one criminal commits a public crime with a gun, the left falls into line to punish all gun owners with new gun laws.  Yet on the other hand, when an illegal immigrant admits to gunning down a woman on San Francisco’s Pier 14, they say it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with their preferred policy.  DUH?

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Harris responded to news of Sanchez’s five previous deportations, seven felony charges, and ‘alleged’ murder of Steinle by saying, “What needs to be looked at is comprehensive immigration reform, that’s the bottom line. Let’s not react to one specific case, when we are looking at a national problem.”  Then this obvious escapee from a rubber-room said, “Let’s react to that specific case in prosecuting that specific murder, and making sure he faces very swift consequences and accountability.”  She went on to say, “On the issue of immigration policy, let’s be smarter.”  How about we simply enforce the law, what a novel idea!

In 2013, when Harris was pushing for a better gun confiscation plan for an outstanding list of prohibited persons who own guns, the Huffington Post reported she had no problem casting what was described as being a rather wide net and defending it by saying, “This is not about ideology or politics. It is a false choice to suggest you are either in support of the Second Amendment or in favor of reasonable gun safety rules. We can do both.”  We already have numerous gun laws, just as we already have numerous immigration laws, neither of which Barry seems to have the slightest interest in enforcing.  We don’t need MORE laws, simply enforce the ones we have.

And in August 2012 the Davis Guard reported that Harris endorsed an “assault weapons” ban that impacted any Californian who owned a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine. The bill’s sponsor, Democrat state senator Leland Yee, argued that the ban was necessary because “similarly-styled weapons were used in the Aurora, Colorado massacre.”  Harris had no problem supporting that ban, although it was a reaction to the murderous actions of a lone gunman in Colorado.  But ask her now about abolishing sanctuary cities, and she’ll tell you overarching immigration policy should not be set based on the actions of one illegal alien in San Francisco.

I suppose there’s always a chance I could become a liberal, but I’ve just never wanted to submit to the required surgery for doing so.  That would be, of course, the dreaded frontal lobotomy.  Because who is it that could ever come to think the way these people do without having first been operated on to remove what would have to be a rather substantial portion of one’s brain?  There is nothing that any of these people ever say that makes any amount of sense.  And what’s more than a little scary is the fact that we seem to have a growing number of them on our side despite the fact that they claim to be conservatives.  We’re supposed to be adults here!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s